If you want a lesson in the ways of the Israeli security apparatus–how it manipulates law and media in service to its interests–take a lesson from the case of Golani Druze Sedki al-Maket. As I reported a few days ago, the security apparatus arrested him (in secret, of course) and slapped a gag order on the case. No Israeli reporter could report the name of the detainee or the charges against him. Thanks to a report in Syrian state media, I was able to expose his identity. My own reporting added the reason why he irked the security apparatus to the extent that it arrested him and likely will bring charges that will send him to prison for years.
UPDATE: Israel’s secret police are so freaked out by Israeli media even noting in their reporting that foreign media outlets (like this blog and two Arab media sources) have reported information about this scandal, that they today issued a sweeping new version of the gag order. By the way, this is the handiwork of Judge Hanna Sabbagh of the Nazareth Magistrate Court, one of the apparently infinitely pliable Israeli jurists (he is Israeli-Palestinian, by the way) when it comes to security matters:
As an extension of the gag order of 2/25/15 in the matter of the security case investigated by the Northern District police and the Shin Bet, today a new gag order was published by Judge Chana Sabag, vice-president of the Nazareth District Court. According to it, the earlier gag order is widened to prohibit publication of any details of the investigation; any detail that might identify the suspects, publication about the reporting of any other media outlets including full or partial quotations from foreign media or publications on the internet, including any direct or indirect hint concerning the information prohibited [in Israel] from publication in this case.
I would urge Reporters Without Borders and the Committee to Protect Journalists and any other NGO which ranks press freedom internationally to take this ludicrous ruling into account when you determine Israel’s ranking.
Now, Syria’s state media outlet reveals two other Golani Druze were arrested along with al-Maket. They are Sheikh Atef Darwish from Baka’ata and Fidaa Majed al-Shaer from Majdal Shams.
A confidential Israeli Druze source informs me that yet another Druze has been arrested. His detention is still secret inside Israel, as is his identity. I can report that he is an IDF soldier, Hilal Halabi, from Daliyat Al-Carmel (near Haifa). My guess is that Halabi serves in the Golan. He knew about the meeting between IDF and Syrian rebel commanders. He conveyed the information to al-Maket, who used it to film his video.
In the coming days, you’re likely to see lurid headlines spoon-fed to the Israeli media by the intelligence services about a Syrian spy cell within the IDF; about Druze who passed secret intelligence to the enemy. And it will all (or mostly) be crap. Don’t believe any (or much) of it.
This is an extraordinary development, but not for the reasons the Shabak would have you believe. The only major non-Jewish ethnic groups who serve in the IDF are Druze and Bedouin. The Druze are especially known for their fierce devotion both to the State and the army. Their history of service goes back to the founding of the State. In recent years, there have been no Shabak arrests of Druze soldiers, while there have been such arrests of Jewish soldiers.
Only recently have young Druze begun to question the legacy of older generations. Several who reached the age of military service have become refusers and gone to jail for their principles. Carmel Druze recently protested Israeli medical treatment offered to al Nusra fighters who’ve killed Syrian Druze.
The arrest of Halabi indicates the gradual deterioration of relations between this minority and the State. The fact that an IDF soldier has collaborated with Golani Druze signifies a growing solidarity between Carmel and Golani Druze. Many of the Golani Druze maintain support or allegiance to Syria. Until now, Israel never had to doubt the loyalty of the Carmel Druze. Until now.
The hawkish Israeli security site 0404 reported this incident revealed a “major security breach.” It said further that the particulars of the case will cause re-evaluation of basic security assumptions. I’m sure that one of them will be the growing suspicion of the loyalty of the Israeli Druze.
Turning to Syria, Israel would like you to believe it’s neutral in the civil war. But it isn’t. Israel has serially bombed Syrian targets and assassinated Syrian and Iranian generals (two) supporting the regime. Several media outlets and I have also reported Israel established a military encampment for Syrian rebels in Israeli-occupied Golan. Israeli media reports:
UN observers stated that tents were set up about 300 meters from the Israeli position for some 70 families of Syrian deserters. The Syrian army sent a letter of complaint to UNDOF in September, claiming this tent camp was a base for “armed terrorists” crossing the border into Israel. The Syrians also warned that if the UN would not evacuate the tent camp, the Syrian army would view it as a legitimate target.
UN peacekeepers have also written reports confirming this. Israel also shared intelligence and transferred weapons to al-Nusra Islamist rebels on the Golan border, and shot down a Syrian fighter jet which spent less than one second over airspace of Israel-occupied Golan (which itself is internationally recognized as Syrian territory.
That’s what al-Maket further exposed. He followed a group of four Syrian rebel commanders as they crossed into Israel-occupied Golan and made their way to a rendezvous with Israeli intelligence officers. They met near border known in Hebrew as Ramat HaMagshimim (UN outpost 85). He videotaped a report some yards from the meeting and described it in detail. Al-Maket then offered the video to the Syrian regime and it was aired on Syrian national TV.
You can imagine how happy the Shabak and IDF AMAN were with this development. Besides noting how poor Israeli security was in ensuring the meeting was held covertly, it further blows out of the water Israel’s claim of neutrality. This couldn’t be countenanced. That’s why he was arrested and the security apparatus is going to such great lengths to try and find him guilty in the media without revealing anything specific about the charges. This is standard operation procedure: to bruit about the claim of a “grave security violation.”
Israeli media coverage of national security issues is of the lowest quality. Reporters routinely publish stories derived from intelligence sources who are anonymous. When arrests are made, reporters very rarely quote defense lawyers or interview family members or colleagues to learn about the suspect (something I try to do whenever I can). They present one side, the side of state power. This makes the detainee guilty before the public even knows his name. It’s a benighted form of journalism, one in which the intelligence apparatus co-opts the Fourth Estate, turning it into an accomplice in victimizing those who resist or dissent.
The truth of the matter is that any real reporter would give their eye-teeth to cover the story Al-Maket had. Israeli journalists, however, would know there wasn’t a chance in hell they could get such a report on the air. The IDF censor would stop it in a heartbeat. But of course, no Israeli Jewish journalist would be arrested for practicing such journalism. That only happens to minority (non-Jewish) journalists. Can you imagine what it must be like for an Israeli reporter knowing he or she can’t do their job? Such is the sorry state of Israel’s “free press.”
Here is Walla’s strange coverage of the story, which amounts to: this is big, but I can’t tell you a thing about it:
Shabak and Police Investigate Grave Security Case in the North
A sweeping gag order has shrouded every detail of the investigation, and any detail likely to identify the suspects in the case. Therefore, we can’t report any additional information at this point. The police released a statement about the existence of the case in light of revelations by journalists of several nations who published about it.
Even this vague non-coverage is incomplete. I was the first journalist who reported both the identity of the detainee and the reason for his arrest (yesterday an Arab-language outlet reported the story and was the first to break the gag order, since its reporter is stationed in Jerusalem and subject to it). As a result, Israeli secret police felt compelled to partially lift the veil on their activities. That’s why it’s so important that foreign journalists not subject to Israeli jurisdiction be able to blow the lid off cases like this.
Foreign media aren’t as constrained: Vice has already reported on similar liaison meetings between Israeli intelligence and rebels. FoxNews aired a TV news segment showing footage of Israeli commandos returning home after liaising with Golani Druze inside Syria. Everyone but the Shabak seems to know this is going on. But the fact that a Golani Druze proved it with video footage rises to a criminal offense.
You and I and any reasonable person (including many Israelis) would want to know if their government was making common-cause with radical Islamists (al Nusra) allied with Al Qaeda. You might, as a citizen, have a good many questions about whether this is a sound policy. You might compare it to the U.S. alliance with the mujahadeen against the Soviets in Afghanistan. You might compare it to the Israeli alliance with the Lebanese Phalangists. Most observers now concede that little long-term good came from these temporary alliances of convenience. But if the Israeli security police have their way, no Israeli will be hearing or talking about any of this.
The way they do this is by using the tools of the national security state (secret arrests, censorship, gag orders, a compliant judicial system) to compel obedience and consensus, and to suppress dissent.
Thank you!
Fine article. I’m confused by the number of players in Syria these days, who’s who, who are allies, who are enemies, and this in a way adds to it. Is Israel allied (per this article) with america’s allies or with America’s enemies? Is Iran an American ally (here, and these days)? So is Israel’s killnig of Iran generals (two) the act of America’s ally or enemy? Just askin’.
Linguistics: you write “to try and find him guilty in the media without revealing anything specific about the charges” and this is the VERY FIRST time I’ve approved of the “try and [verb]” formation (instead of “try to [verb]” formation — and the reason is that, here, you (apparently) wish to use “try” in the legal-procedural sense. GOOD WORK!
@ pabelmont: I’m not the best English grammarian, but I always use “to try to” rather than “to try and.” I guess that lesson did sink in in elementary school!
This strengthens your argument about why a Druze soldier would do this, and the pressure the Druze in Syria are under.
“Agreement Between Walid Jumblatt and Al-Nusra Front” And they are worried those nuts are going to ask for druze wives.
http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/agreement-between-walid-jumblatt-and-al-nusra-front
These Israeli Druzim should have exposed any al Nusra-Israel links without running afoul of the State of Israel. Taking the story straight to Syria national TV was a poor choice of venue since Israel and Syria are, technically speaking, still at war. Do you know of any Israeli media outlet that would’ve run this report? If so, I might agree that they should’ve interested Israeli media in it. But you & I both know that not only would they not find an outlet, they’d get arrested via a trusty editor who’d report them to the Shin Bet.
@ Hefe: They are NOT “Israeli Druzim.” Only one of the suspects, the one from Haifa, is “Israeli.” The others are Syrian Golani Druze who live unwilling under Israeli Occupation. They consider themselves Syrian, so taking the story to Syrian TV is a natural (not a “poor”) choice. Do you know any Israeli media outlet that would air that video? If so, I’d agree that they should’ve approached Israeli media. But the truth is that taking it to an Israeli media outlet would not only have resulted in rejection, it would’ve ended them up in jail, informed on by a compliant, ‘patriotic’ editor.
Southern Front from the Jordanian border, a corridor is created towards Damascus (Ghouta) for arms and rebel transport. This is the US/UK allied with al-Nusra and with direct support from IDF, Israel. Near Aleppo, the last rebel forces with direct support from the US and Western allies have evaporated with hundreds killed and the lucky ones joining extremist groups like al-Nusra and IS. The weapons and munitions have been transfered to these same forces.
○ US-backed Harakat Hazm no longer exists after defeat to Jabhat al-Nusra
○ Turkey, Saudi Arabia agree to boost support to Syria opposition
MEMRI spreading the usual lies, picked up by other media (AP).
○ King Salman wants Pan-Arab armed forces to fight Iran and Daesh | Gulf News |
Iraq’s assault on IS sparks fears of new atrocities in the Sunni triangle | The Guardian |
According to Iraqi and Iranian media, Qassem Suleimani, commander of the al-Quds force covert operations branch of Tehran’s Revolutionary Guards, is currently in Salahuddin to help coordinate the new offensive.
○ Iranian commanders lead 30,000 strong combined Sunni/Shia forces in attack on Tikrit
As someone who is not up to speed on I/P, but who knows a bit about Syria, I would have thought it obvious that Israel is engaging with Jabhat al-Nusra as their ally. JaN are the major power south of Damascus, and particularly in the Golan.
It is unfortunate that JaN are closely with al-Qa’ida. No doubt it will be possible to erase that connection with a bit of cleansing.
as requested …
○ Syria’s Nusra Front may leave Qaeda to form new entity
h/t MoA
‘Moderates’, Clapper used gestural scare-quotes, is anyone who is not part of the Islamic State. That Clapper thought of Jabhat and similar Jihadi groups like Ahrar al-Sham, is obvious from his reference to international law. The United Nations Security Council classified Jabhat as an international terrorist organization. Supporting it, like Israel does in south Syria, is a violation of UNSC resolutions. As a veto wielding member the U.S. would not like to be caught doing that.
[comment deleted: you have violated a major comment rule. You are now moderated and will be banned if you break any further rules. Use the term “self-hating Jew” here again & I’ll ban you faster than you can blink an eye. Go ahead, make my day!
“Self-Hating Jew” haha can’t even go a single sentence without putting forth an ad hominem, the most elementary of logical fallacies!
Can’t discuss on principle so have to resort to lowbrow tactics. Typical.
Israel sure is good at creating them. They should try to stop doing that.
This is for you. https://twitter.com/AtefehNaeemi/status/573258483442720768
○ Blast in Syria kills top al Qaeda commander also reported in Newsweek
General Military Commander Abu Humam al-Shami, a veteran of Islamist militant fighting in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria, was the senior-most member of the group to die in the Syria war.
Well done. This is a very important story that is being shirked in all mainstream media — Robert Fisk, however, just ran a piece predicting that the U.S. will soon be arming al-Nusra, and as usual the evidence he cites is persuasive. It’s not surprising that the U.S. position should dovetail with Israel’s.
Incidentally, this piece is linked in APN’s News Nosh, so people who have the good sense to get their mainstream Israeli news from uncensored sites can read all about it, notwithstanding Israel’s efforts to suppress the story. Don’t hold your breath for New York Times coverage, though.