3 thoughts on “Bill Kristol’s First Times Column…And It’s Pure Gold

  1. Kristol is a walking intellectual black hole, really nothing to say there.

    I have to admit that I find Huckabee entertaining and somewhat likable, not that this is important or relevant Presidential criteria. I could never vote for Huckabee, or any Republican for that matter (except a Ron Paul/HRC contest would be a difficult call and I can imagine my hand floating fleetingly over to the Republican ( ) circle–in the end I’d probably pick a third-party candidate over Hillary), but it’s hard for me to despise Huckabee the way I do Romney, Guiliani and the other neocon crypto-fascists and Wall Street Barons. I’ll take a dose of conservative populism over the Weltanschaung of the George Will’s and Norman Podhoretz’s. Huckabee’s hee-haw religious conservatism and (sometimes) demagoguing is disturbing and a bit scary, but frankly there are scarier things out there. I would even venture that Hillary Clinton’s sober and quite secular acceptance of belligerent American militarism and empire scares me a little more.

  2. Malkin is definitely a writer – remember her infamous book defending the WWII Japanese internment camps? – but I’m hard-pressed to think of anything that she’s actually “conserving”.

    More generally, however, most (not all) bloggers do qualify as writers. They may not be professional (salary-earning) writers, and they may not be well-known writers, and yes, they might not be good writers, but they are writers nonetheless.

    BTW, it’s “Ann”, not “Anne”, Coulter. If Kristol does mention Coulter, please let us know – as I recall, Coulter once publicly mused that Timothy McVeigh should have blown up the New York Times!

  3. I wish you had kept this quiet Richard. I’ve heard Rudi’s people (Pipes and Co. aka Count Aipacula) are trying to line up Steven Seagal in case they ever win anything.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

557 views 0 Shares
Share via
Copy link