4 thoughts on “2017 Israeli Democracy Poll – Tikun Olam תיקון עולם إصلاح العالم
task-attention.png
Comments are published at the sole discretion of the owner.
 

  1. “Nationality derives from nationhood, not from religion”
    Judaism is not a religion but a ‘peoplehood'{ maybe even a ‘consciousness-but still determined from whence the body issued}.
    The ‘thread’ of the law has sustained its existence thru the ages.
    In Christianity and Islam one can be excommunicated but not in Judaism even if there be a חרם etc it means the ‘excommunicated’ loses his social rights etc but he remains a Jew.
    Even one born from a Jewish mother who wasn’t aware that she was Jewish the newborn is Jewish or potentially or in actu when he/she is in informed that his/her mother is Jewish.
    The matrilineal line has been the defining factor for at least the last 2000 yrs.

    1. @ marty:

      Judaism is not a religion

      There goes your credibility on the subject of Judaism.

      but a ‘peoplehood'{ maybe even a ‘consciousness

      The concept of peoplehood is so vague as to mean virtually anything. Even more so when you attach the amorphous phrase “consciousness” to it. At any rate, peoplehood has nothing to do with nationhood. So again, Israel is a NATION and being Israeli a nationality. At least it should be. Those who equate Israeliness with Judaism and Jewishness are destroying Israel’s chance of ever being a normal, tolerant & democratic state.

      The ‘thread’ of the law has sustained its existence thru the ages.

      Nope. It sustained Jews until the Enlightenment. Since then, not so much. Halacha is an important factor in Judaism. IF Israel is a theocracy then it will be an important factor in the state’s self definition. If you’re a Kahanist-racialist-neo-Nazi, then you’re cool with that. I’m not.

      And please stop offering us definitions of who is a Jew. It puts me to sleep.

      1. The reality of Israel is that it is a rassenstaadt, a Racial State made up around the belief that Mandate Palestine was the homeland of the Jews and that they (Israelis) have the Absolute Right to run the place for their own benefit, facts on the ground be damned. Such a state cannot be run as a democratic republic as we understand the term – the racist element will always subvert the democracy. Thus it makes far more sense to run Israel as a one-party dictatorship, and Israel is now moving towards that end goal, no matter that it runs counter to the world belief in democracy. The Arab World need do nothing to Israel – it will destroy itself in a few decades and the land will be Palestinian again, though possibly radioactive.

  2. Richard says:
    ”A few comments on the findings: it’s bizarre that Israeli Jews would say the primary meaning of being a Jewish state is that it provides a national identity. You would either have to be a Jewish supremacist to believe this; or not understand the difference between a state and a religion. At any rate, this finding goes to the heart of the contradiction between religion and democracy and proves that they contradict each other. Nationality derives from nationhood, not from religion.”

    I don’t know whether it is bizarre that Israeli Jews say that the primary meaning of a Jewish state is national. After all being Jewish is not only a religious identity in Israel, in the Population Register and in ID cards, but it is a nationality. that after all was the purpose of Zionism, to transform the religion into a nation/race. Hence why there is no Israeli nationality because that would immediately erect a barrier between Israeli Jews and Diaspora Jews.

    If Israel was not a settler colonial entity then believing that being Jewish also made you, WITHIN THE ISRAELI CONTEXT, an Israeli Jewish national, would not necessarily be Jewish supremacist though in practice it would tend that way. Of course if there were one Israeli nationality then being Jewish would simply be a non-Arabic component no more. But yes to define nationality on the basis of religion is a backward indeed medieval concept. The rise of bourgeois nationalism as per the French Revolution was to define nationality on the basis of residence and language. In this respect Israel is a throwback to the Europe of 200 years ago and the fascist regimes in Europe of the 1930’s.

    Tony Greenstein http://www.azvsas.blogspot.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: