Not content with dispossessing nearly 1 million Israeli Palestinians during the Nakba through exile and theft of their land, Israel is repeating this Original Sin against the Negev Bedouin, who’ve lived in their homes for decades. The State now intends to expel the Bedouin from these settlements, where they’ve lived for several generations, and to appropriate the land for itself. In many cases, there are plans hatched with the Jewish National Fund and Israel Lands Authority to Judaize the Negev by creating new Jewish settlements to replace the Bedouin.
There are indigenous tribal members who are fighting back with every means at their disposal. But the odds and long and the deck is stacked. Every legal appeal has been repelled by a judiciary that many liberal Zionists like to claim stands as a bulwark against the worst excesses of rampant Israeli nationalism. This particular issue shows the limits of such optimism.
Ben Gurion University Prof. Oren Yiftachel provides historical background to this struggle:
Since its foundation, the State of Israel refuses to recognize Bedouin ownership over ancestral lands in the Negev. Most of the Bedouins did not register their lands in 1921, as was required by one of the British laws; but neither did most other residents of Mandatory Palestine, including Jewish ones, carry out such registration. Sixty years later, the State of Israel made cynical use of this lack of registration to order to register most Bedouin lands as “State Lands”, thus making the Bedouins into “invaders” or “squatters” on their own ancestral land.
Some of the Bedouins have tried to challenge the system of dispossession. Notable among them is Nuri el-Okbi, long-time dedicated human rights activist. In recent years, Nuri and his brothers are conducting a series of law suits against the state, demanding restoration of the lands taken from them in the fifties.
A few weeks ago, a ruling rejecting the claims of the el-Okbis was made in an important case – one in which for the first time a professional support team was involved, including attorney Michael Sfard, geographer Oren Yiftachel and other experts. The proceeding lasted three years, during which dozens of witnesses testified and hundreds of documents and expert reports [were] submitted, attesting to the el-Okbis’ ownership of the land.
The judge, however, chose to render a harsh, confrontational ruling, sticking to earlier precedents and concluding that any land which had not been registered in 1921 is ipso facto the property of the state. The court relied mainly on legal precedents, hardly referring to the evidence presented. Therefore, it is very important to lodge an appeal to the Supreme Court – the only body which is empowered to overturn precedents and strike out in a new direction.
At such a hearing, the judges would not be able to ignore the rich materials submitted by the el-Okbi Tribe, and the new legal arguments presented. In addition, such an appeal would strengthen the struggle of tens of thousands of Bedouins, who at this very moment are struggling against government plans to evict them to existing townships.
The government’s plan is based on the wrong assumption that Bedouins have no land ownership rights, and a Supreme Court appeal is now the only way to stop these draconian plans. Therefore, it is highly important to lodge an appeal on the el-Okbi Land Case, and make it clear that the Bedouin community is determined to struggle for their basic human rights – specifically to change a legal ruling which causes severe and completely undeserved damage to a large section of Israel’s citizen body.
Gush Shalom adds:
After a legal struggle lasting three years, the Be’er Sheba District Court rejected the appeal of Nuri al-Okbi, veteran activist for the rights of the Negev Bedouins. El-Okbi’s plea for recognition of ownership over the Al-Araqib lands, from which he and his family were evicted in 1951, was rejected out of hand by Judge Sarah Dovrat. The ruling has wide implications for Negev Bedouins in general, implying an overall denial of their rights over ancestral lands.
Here is further information on the legal case and how to make a donation:
Nuri el-Okbi decided to appeal to the Supreme Court in Jerusalem, asking it to overturn this unfair ruling. In order to be eligible to lodge such an appeal, however, el-Okbi must pay no later than May 10 the punitive “court expenses” which had been imposed on him by the Be’er Sheba Court, as well as rendering various other legal fees – altogether amounting to the sum of 70,000 Shekels (about 20,000 US Dollars). This amount Nuri and his family – who have already spent considerable funds on ongoing legal procedures ever since 1973 – are unable to pay from their own resources.
We therefore call upon you to provide an urgent donation and give Nuri el-Okbi a chance to try redressing a blatant miscarriage of justice.
Checks should be sent to:
Yoav Haas
POB 1335
Kfar-Sava, Israel 44113And made payable to Yoav Haas or Ya’akov Manor (both are veteran activists for human and civil rights in general, and for the Negev Bedouins in particular).
I urge all my readers to dig into your pockets to offer whatever financial support you can for this righteous appeal.
For the literalists out there who may not understand my tongue in cheek photo caption, el-Okbi operates a garage near Lod. The municipality has periodically given his business an operating license, but lately it has refused. After initially accepting a compromise sentence that would’ve involved community service, the judge imposed a seven-month jail sentence on him. In his remarks, he said that the victim’s political activism on behalf of the Bedouin compelled him to include jail time in the sentence. That’s why I’ve written in my caption that he’s been jailed for “being Bedouin without a license.” This of course is a reference to the punitive nature of the Israeli State when it comes to its indigenous, non-Jewish citizens.
From what I gather there was an attempt to use Australian native title legislation and court rulings as they were seen to be providing a precedence under very similar circumstances. It seem as if the judge wouldn’t have a bar of it. This will be different in the High Court. Ironically the Australian case was not only led by a prominent pro-Israel member of the Jewish community in Ron Castan QC, many others including people closely associated with Zionist bodies provided a lot of assistance for Indigenous land rights here. This event will really test them.(Some of the experts they brought to the High Court of Australia will be appearing in front of Israel’s High Court of Justice.
Things are not going much better for the Sinai Bedouins. Have you seen this:
Sinai Bedouins kidnap 6 Egyptian soldiers
EL-ARISH, Egypt (Ma’an) — Six Egyptian soldiers were kidnapped by armed Bedouins in the Sinai peninsula on Saturday, before being released shortly afterward, Egyptian officials said.
The soldiers were abducted at gun point while on guard 5km from the Egyptian-Israeli border after masked gunmen arrived in two jeeps with unmarked number plates.
Egypt’s army deployed dozens of armored tanks in the area, forcing the Bedouin gunmen to release the soldiers.
Sinai Bedouin complain of unfair treatment and government neglect and press their demands by blocking roads and occasionally taking tourists hostage, releasing them soon afterward following negotiations with the authorities.
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=482771
So what does that have to do with the subject of this blog entry? Unless it’s the old hasbara playbook trick of changing the subject when cornered.
Many of the Sinai Bedouins were originally inhabitants of what is now Israel who were driven out and forced to relocate to Egypt.
Also remember that Sinai was occupied by Israel from 1967 until it was turned over to Egypt in 1982.
The hardships facing the Sinai Bedouins, like those facing the Negev Bedouins are inexorably linked to Israel, and their fates are linked to one another in many respects.
Egypt has done a much better job of integrating them into the fabric of their society than Israel has, that’s for sure. Israel seems keen on “urbanizing” the population at all costs for some reason.
Thanks for your comment & I agree fully. Though I’m not sure how well Egypt has done. It may’ve done better than Israel, but there is still great discontent among Sinai Bedouin.
Just as it does here, uproar about this dispossession will simply invoke the original dispossession at the root of the illegitimacy of Israel as a Jewish state. As one remains forever unconscionable, so is the other and therefore I believe that the Israeli judiciary is unfit to even hear such a case. I am reluctant to put my bet on a sympathetic hearing in a system built on the much larger dispossession of land and rights. It may be hypocritical of me to support a petition to an Israel court on an issue that it has no standing to adjudicate. Not that I won’t support such an appeal: I just want to note that doing so means dealing with a devil who will likely not incriminate himself with a favorable finding.
I would not recommend donating money to this legal struggle. Not because it is not a just struggle but because it is like trying to change the system of Apartheid from within. All of Israel’s crimes and excesses have always been rubber stamped by the Supreme Court and there is no reason to believe that it will be any different here. The entire system is corrupt to the bone, as is the Jewish State concept.
Money is certainly needed but it should be directed at dismantling the Apartheid structure altogether which enables one group of people to oppress and benefit at the expense of others.
You are welcome to your view, but I remind you & my readers that a member of an Israeli indigenous people has appealed to us for support. I’d rather be dictated by his own needs & priorities than by yours. His tribe and other Bedouin tribes stand to lose their ancestral lands if they lose this case. Of course it’s important to dismantle the system, but this is not an Either-Or proposition. One can & should do both. Doing only one while dismissing the other is a false premise.
“Checks should be sent to:
Yoav Haas
POB 1335
Kfar-Sava, Israel 44113”
I sent them $20. But at the post office, when I was buying the $1.05 International stamp, the clerk looked at the address & insisted that I cross out the number code & put it before the country. He said that 44113 was the ZIP for Cleveland, Ohio, & the automated system might mistakenly send the letter there.
Good point. Thanks for letting us know. Letters should be clearly marked as “International” and “Air Mail.” And thanks for your contribution.
Achad Haadam.
Eddie Mabo is dead so he can’t respond to you but when he started his struggle Queensland treatment of Indigenous Australians wasn’t very different to Apartheid and he fought his fights right through the entire court system. But you go ahead and be pure.