Israel places a gag on reporting the names of any members of its intelligence services except the chiefs. Even former officers are proscribed from exposure. In the coming days, Bibi Netanyahu has promised to name the new Mossad chief who will assume the reins from Meir Dagan, who is retiring after eight years in the job. Of all the candidates, the names of all but one are publicly known. But one, because is a former senior Mossad officer, is not. That individual is Tamir Pardo, currently known as T. to the Israeli media.
Despite this prohibition, Channel 10’s military reporter did name Pardo in a June tweet. This only shows that the military censor isn’t paying very close attention (yet) to Twitter as a source for exposing Israel’s secrets.
It was quite easy for my Israeli source (and many other Israeli journalists) to piece together the reporting that has been done and find Pardo’s name published clear as day in a Hebrew language book about the Entebbe raid (accompanying image from Google Books), in which he participated under the command of Yoni Netanyahu, Bibi’s older brother. Pardo was communications officer for the raid and this certainly creates a potential bond between PM and candidate.
He rose rapidly through the ranks from a technical specialist in the research division founded by Uzi Arad, to trusted operative. Pardo expected to be named assistant director by Dagan. Instead, the latter promoted another candidate, N., to that position and Dagan lent Pardo to the IDF as a senior operations advisor to the chief of staff.
In 2007, N. had a falling out with Dagan (who was known for driving away subordinates) and resigned immediately. Dagan called Pardo back from his IDF position and appointed him to the number 2 job. The latter returned in the hope, once again, that he would be named to replace the current chief when he retired. But Dagan once again disappointed and accepted a job extension that offered an almost unprecedented eighth year of service. Finally, Pardo quit the Mossad entirely and went into private industry. Rumors have it that the former intelligence officer developed business interests with Israeli internet gambling entrepreneur Noam Lanir.
One development that may dim Pardo’s chances for the job is that he apparently knew beforehand about the infamous forged Galant memo which was intended to embarrass Defense Minister Ehud Barak and frustrate Yoav Galant’s candidacy to be IDF chief of staff.
As I’ve said before here, I don’t believe that as important a job as this one should be handed to someone about whom the average Israeli knows next to nothing, including his name. Let’s stand for transparency and vetting a man fully before he ascends to such a powerful position. The more you know, the less unpleasant surprises there will be. Since we know very little, the chances of this happening during a Pardo tenure of Mossad chief are quite high.
The name ‘Pardo’ is of Spanish origin (“A family deriving its name from Prado in Castile”), which means that our candidate may be Sephardic. If so, he may be the first Sephardi named to such a position.
NOTE: Rotter, which has rarely ever censored any scoop I’ve published has deleted the thread that linked to this post. Do they realize that Pardo’s name has already been published on Twitter? It’s really a shame because Rotter has a reputation for being a freewheeling forum when it comes to publishing such scoops. So much for democracy and free speech in the Only Democracy in the Middle East.
Yoni was Bibi’s older brother, not younger. Bibi tried to follow in his footsteps but Omer Bar-Lev beat him to the job.
Right you are. It’s now corrected.
The twitter page doesn’t exist anymore, but then it’s no longer relevant. It was announced earlier today (16:00 M.E. time) same name. The military reporter of channel 10 was right, Tamir Pardo is the next Mossad chief.
Interesting, Yossi Melman reported yesterday in Haaretz that the tweet existed. The reporter must’ve deleted it after that. See how frightened these so-called journalist-lemmings are of their own shadow??
I don’t have to, I know so. My point of view is that only few of our journalists are willing to let go of their direct communication connections in the so called high places and act/write with professional integrity, especially when military/security issues are the subject.