UPDATE: Maan reports (and 972 live-blogs the riots–can you even do such a thing?) that in ongoing clashes throughout East Jerusalem between Palestinian residents and 3,000 Israel police, a 14 month-old baby was smothered by tear gas shot into its home. Israel’s police PR flack had the chutzpah to say the following:
Israeli police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld said he had not received any reports of injuries and that police were using minimum force to respond to incidents in Al-Isawiya, Silwan and Ras Al-Amoud.
For this baby, unfortunately minimal force was lethal. Do the police care? One wonders how or if this will impact the ersatz Israel-Palestine peace talks being stage-managed by the U.S. How many dead will it take before someone recognizes that a faux settlement freeze is not enough to secure peace?
I just read a Maan headline:
Israel to PLO: Any new settlement projects will be `limited in scope`
Reassuring indeed. And the suffering continues…
David Shulman filed one of his typically profound, humane and deeply moving pieces about the suffering inflicted by Israeli Occupation on Palestinian and Jew alike. There is unfortunately no Nobel Prize for literature of peace. But when there is, Shulman deserves it hands down. Though his story has been published elsewhere I don’t have the heart to select the best bits and excerpt them for you. So let David speak in his own powerful words.
This week is Sukkot, the Festival of Booths, which marks the wandering of the Israelites in the Sinai desert after they left Egypt and on their way to Israel and freedom. The lived in makeshift huts made from natural vegetation and open to the elements. This ephemeral nature of the habitation reminds us of the fragile state of human existence. This is also a holiday that revolves around family and friends with whom we eat and even sleep in the Sukkah.
Shulman describes the wonderful project devised by a Palestinian friend of building a Sukkah in Sheikh Jarrah, a Palestinian neighborhood. Extraordinary to think that given the violence and dispossession these families have suffered at the hands of the Israeli government that they would welcome the celebration of a Jewish holiday in their midst.
I read on the Facebook Wall of an Israeli peace activist that “not since Rome has a conqueror destroyed a Sukkah.” Not a historically verifiable fact. But a powerful thought nonetheless. Imagine the hillul of a State that considers itself Jewish destroying not once, but three separate times, a halachically kosher sukkah. Are these people Jews or hooligans? This alone is proof that religion is not the heart of the problem between Israelis and Palestinians. Israel uses religion as part of its ongoing battle to justify the unjustifiable, the Occupation. If religion mattered a whit to these people they wouldn’t have desecrated that sukkah.
Ah yes, they will say that a sukkah built by leftists, even if Jewish, with the help of Palestinians–what is that? That can’t be a Jewish. It’s a monstrous hybrid deserving of destruction. The only thing that is monstrous is this Occupation regime and the mockery it makes of its own religion. The real heart of this conflict is politics, power and land. Religion is a very distant fourth, if that.
Let David tell the rest:
September 22, 2010 Sheikh Jarrah, Succot
It may sound unlikely, but we’re in ‘Uthman ibn ‘Affan Street in Sheikh Jarrah and, together with Salah and other Palestinian friends from the neighborhood, we’re building a succah. The Succot holiday, my favorite, starts tonight. Religious Jews build little booths covered with palm fronds and eat and sleep in them for seven nights, a memory of the forty years of wandering in the desert and a reminder of the precariousness of all that exists, all that we value and love. You’re supposed to be able to see the stars through the fronds that provide a make-shift roof; honored guests, beginning with the Patriarchs and ending on day seven with King David, are invited to visit each day.
But why build one in Sheikh Jarrah, in the street where the al-Ghazi and al-Kurd houses have been taken over by Israeli settlers and the Palestinian owners driven out? Mr. Al-Kurd, dignified and calm as always, is watching over the construction. New and surprising forms of Palestinian-Israeli friendship have sprung up in this neighborhood in the course of the ongoing struggle, with its weekly demonstrations—often violently suppressed by the police (over a hundred demonstrators have been arrested during the last eight or nine months). The demonstrations are usually on Friday afternoon, but last week’s was cancelled because of Yom Kippur. Two nights before the fast, however, there was a joint prayer session in Sheikh Jarrah, and the exquisite texts of the Selichot—supplications for forgiveness—were read out together, in Arabic and Hebrew, by the activists and the evicted families, standing on this same tortured street, with the settlers jeering at them. I heard that many of our people had tears in their eyes.
There’s no question that the Jews have a lot to ask forgiveness for. There’s something shocking to me, still, in the High Holiday time in Israel. I live in a mixed neighborhood that has, over the years, like most neighborhoods in Jerusalem, becoming increasingly right-wing. Many of my neighbors are religious and, of course, strident nationalists, and some of them are even what I would call soft-core racists. They find it convenient to hate Palestinians, or Arabs in general, and they feel no compunction whatsoever about the Israeli settlement project and the ongoing theft of Palestinian land, on the West Bank and in East Jerusalem, proceeding apace day by day. So how is it, I ask myself—you have to forgive my stubborn innocence—that these same neighbors can spend Yom Kippur praying for forgiveness for their sins without even noticing that we, the people of Israel, are guilty of terrible crimes against our Palestinian brothers and sisters? Why bother going to the synagogue at all if you are so blind to the suffering of others, if you are living a lie? I know I’ll never understand.
So here we are building together a succat shalom, a Succah of Peace—another resonant phrase from the prayer book—and the police are, of course, here in force together with the Jerusalem municipality’s building inspectors, and they’ve given us notice that what we are doing is illegal and they will destroy the succah as soon as it’s built. You should know that the city is absolutely filled with succot, thousands of them, many of them built (without permits, of course) on sidewalks and other public thoroughfares (in some areas, such as Nahlaot, you can barely negotiate your way along the street), and none of them, it goes without saying, is in danger of being demolished—since they are good Jewish succot, after all, respectable appurtenances of the tribe. But a Palestinian-Israel Peace Succah, that’s clearly another matter. There’s no way the police will let it stand. It’s a public menace. It might disturb for a few moments the proper order of a world in which Palestinians can be ruthlessly driven from their homes, and those who protest against this cruelty will be thrown in jail. It might even make some ordinary person stop and think when he or she reads the inscription on the cloth panel forming one of the succah‘s sides: “The Sheikh Jarrah Succah of Peace.” Who knows what unsettling thoughts this rickety structure of poles and tinsel decorations might engender? Besides, we’re building it right outside the houses the settlers have stolen, and the pious settlers might take offense.
It’s somehow comforting to engage in these doomed, purely symbolic actions; it feels right. The very futility of it all makes it all the better, all the more necessary, even fun; in fact, the more absurd the better. Credo quia absurdum est. And there is the friendship infusing this moment and giving it meaning. We were here ten days ago for a joint ‘Id al-Fitr/Rosh Hashana party, and Mr. Al-Kurd spoke with his usual gracious forbearance, thanking us for standing beside them, and a little Palestinian girl took the microphone and said, “We are tired of the settlers’ stealing our homes and our toys.” I have to confess, though, that today, as the afternoon wears on and the succah is destroyed, not once but twice, I’m also feeling very angry. This has been a tough day. In the early hours of the morning, a security guard employed by the Jewish settlers in Silwan, under the walls of the Old City, shot and killed a 32-year-old Palestinian man, Samir Sirhan, a father of five. I wasn’t there to see it, I don’t know exactly how it happened, but I can say with confidence that if there were no Israeli enclave planted by force in the heart of Palestinian Silwan, with an armed mercenary militia to “protect” it, Samir would probably still be alive. Another two, at least, were wounded (the police have clamped down a news blackout, no one knows for sure how many were hurt). Amiel got there early and was, of course, arrested. (You can be quite sure that nothing will happen to the security guard who shot and killed.) Silwan, meanwhile, has erupted in violent protest. It wouldn’t take much to spark off another Intifada, especially the way things are going, with Netanyahu refusing to renew the “freeze” on building in the settlements. If the talks collapse over this, as they may, or over some other piece of wicked foolishness, another round of violence is all too likely: that was the Chief of Staff’s assessment, as of yesterday. You have to remember, too, that every single housing unit that goes up in the territories is a crime under international law as well as a crime against ordinary human decency and against God, if there is a God.
So our succah is also planned as a Booth of Mourning for Samir, as is customary among Palestinians—another reason, no doubt, for the authorities to attack it. The Sheikh Jarrah protest, perhaps the most hopeful development in the Israeli peace movement in recent years, is closely allied with grass-roots Palestinian protest in Silwan. Three weeks ago we held a medium-size demonstration in Silwan against El’ad, the settler organization that effectively rules the village and that has been given responsibility for the archaeological site there, which they call the City of David, the most sensitive such site in the country (another unthinkable outrage, possible only in Israel). Every year El’ad runs an archaeological conference and tour in Silwan, open to the public, and we were there to protest. We managed to make ourselves heard, at considerable cost; Daniel, standing right beside me, was brutally battered, kicked, and trampled by the police, without provocation, and taken off, bleeding profusely, his glasses shattered, to jail; Ram was seriously wounded in the foot by a border policeman; several others were also hurt, and eight arrested. I found it more depressing than usual, though in our terms these days the demonstration counts as a success. I had just returned from India, and the renewed encounter with hard-core monotheists was something of a shock.
For the record, and in brief, here is how the Succah comes crashing down. It’s standing there on the sidewalk, miraculously held together by strings and poles, as a Succah should be, and gaudily decorated with paper cut-outs and bright paintings and shiny flowers which we prepared together with the Palestinian children. Looks not bad. Nissim says we should apply to the annual competition for the Most Beautiful Succah prize. It huddles under a large fig tree whose branches spill over the courtyard wall; indeed, the Succah could easily be taken as no more than a slight extension of this beautiful tree. We’re rather proud of it. We stand inside it as the police advance, and of course it’s not very sturdy so within about three minutes it’s been ripped apart, the poles strewn over the street, the palm fronds snapped, the decorations mangled and torn. At just this moment one of the settlers walks into the courtyard of his stolen house carrying a large palm frond for his succah, which, I assure you, no one will demolish; he wishes us a happy holiday. I can also assure you that ours is the only succah to be destroyed by the municipality this year.
Silan is arrested during this short altercation. As soon as it’s over, we start again. This time we forget about the poles on the sidewalk; we will hang the cloth panels down from a few wooden rods resting on the enclosure wall and reaching into the fig tree. There’s even room for a few more decorations. Salah works happily, defiantly, at making this half-succah fit the classical model, more or less, and after half an hour or so it is, indeed, a passable specimen, and even less of an Obstruction to the Public than its noble predecessor. However, it quickly shares the former’s sad fate.
Before the police move in the second time, I take my stand inside this lovable little booth; it’s where I want to be. Hillel is standing beside me; he knows Jewish law inside out, so when I say that I’m afraid that this is not quite a kosher succah—for one thing, you definitely can’t see the sky (to say nothing, in theory, of any stars)– he laughs and at once confirms this thought. Still, I decide that since I’ve helped build it, and I believe deeply in the almost hopeless idea that it embodies, I might as well say the holiday blessing. You’re supposed to utter it sitting down, but there’s nowhere to sit in the Palestinian-Israeli Succah of Peace in its final moments, so I change the formula just a little: “Blessed art Thou, Lord of the Universe, who has commanded us to stand in the Succah.” You know what, maybe He does, after all, exist. Hillel, who knows I’ve been away in India, asks me if I’m back to stay a while, and I say yes and, a little bitterly, quote the old Zionist song: “I’ve come up to the Land to build and be built.” I wave my arms at our fragile, tacky, quixotic creation. “As you can see,” I say, “so far it’s not going very well.”
“Why bother going to the synagogue at all if you are so blind to the suffering of others, if you are living a lie? I know I’ll never understand.”
David Shulman shouldn’t be surprised.
Well, it’s a long standing Jewish tradition. Jews who don’t keep shabbat, eat non-kosher, sleep around, and do various other infractions of the Jewish codes turn up in their masses every year and shout out confessing their worst sins and then carry on as usual as soon as they get home or even sooner! It’s part of a collective “no one’s perfect” philosophy that defies logic. I’m also part of it and I suspect David Shulman is too.
But I wonder how many of us notice the often repeated liturgical theme: “Ashamnu micol am, boshnu micol dor (we have sinned more than all peoples, we are ashamed more than all nations)”. I think David may have missed this, Jews are well aware of their shortcommings and are not ashamed to shout them out in public – I sometimes wish other peoples could also see their own wrongs as clearly as we do ours, but we don’t hear them so much, they prefer to see only ours.
Shmuel)
“I sometimes wish other peoples could also see their own wrongs as clearly as we do ours, but we don’t hear them much, they prefer to see only ours”.
Wow, you managed to express it all in only 2-3 lines.
1. The very ethnocentric notion of Jewish exceptionalism (‘we’re maybe not more perfect than others, but as we are more aware of our lack of perfection, in fact that makes us more perfect’).
2. The accusation of anti-semitism (‘they only see ours’);
You just missed the essential point of relating this moral superiority to Israel’s behaviour – ‘we are behaving in a very cruel way towards the Palestinians, but at least we are aware of that’ – and ‘the rest of the world’s critique is merely an expression of asking more from the Jews’.
I didn’t know the degree of morality came along with ethnic and/or religious belonging. By the way, what do you know about other “people’s” way of perceiving their own shortcomings ?? Is that a course you can take in shul on “We versus the Others” or what ?
I find both you and him ironic. Him, for the reasons you mentioned above, and you, because you criticize accusations of anti-semitism, yet attribute “the ethnocentric notion of Jewish exceptionalism” to all Jews.
# shai]
Where do you see my attribution of ‘the ethnocentric notion of Jewish exceptionalism’ to all Jews ??
I was strictly sticking to Shmuel’s comments. He talks about ‘we’ and ‘they’, and pretends there is a kind of common ethnic/religious denomminator on moral issues which I totally disagree with. At least that’s what I intended to express.
Culture, religion, socio-economic backgrounds etc of course have an influence on your world vision, but you might as well react against your social upbringing as reproduce it, and I really don’t believe in any ethnico-religious determinism . . . and yet, maybe I do. Reading some of those right-wingers coming around here recently, they might be influenced by environmental brainwashing after all.
In that case I fully agree with you, including this comment. 🙂
Besides, the prayer fragment that you cited is treated by many just the same way as the rest of the liturgy — a lip service that is paid quickly and does not interfere with doing all the bad things throughout the year.
And by the way, “boshnu mi-kol dor” is “we are ashamed more than every generation.”
LOL! So, one of the many ways Jews are superior to all other peoples is that they are aware of their shortcomings and will admit them publicly.
How can one respond when self-congratulation reaches that level?
[comment deleted for comment rule violation–consider yourself warned, the next violation will lead to termination of your commenting privileges]
Here is the latest update (as of Sunday A.M. ) in Israel about the situation there:
http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/jerusalem-police-remain-on-alert-after-holiday-rioting-1.315514
No mention of any dead baby. At least one of the the sources of information you are using (I believe it is one of the peole at “972”) has , as I recall, reported in the past an incident of an Arab being killed at Bat Ayin which purportedly took place as “vengeance” for a killing of a child resident there. The report was false.
On another vein: Here, J-Street has finally admitted that George Soros is one of their major donors. They tried to keep it secret for a long time. Why?
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/billionaire-george-soros-revealed-as-mystery-j-street-donor-1.315700
Maan reported the dead baby and named the child as well. If you have a problem, take it up w. them. And man, would you at least read the links I insert so that you know what you’re talking about. 972 didn’t report the dead baby at all. It would save us all a lot of wasted time & energy if you only speculated after actually reading the links I offer. The fact that you don’t makes you an inferior advocate for yr position & points out how lazy you are.
As for George Soros & J St. I could care less. But when you get as angry about Republican 504 groups hiding their donors lists then I’ll join you in being angry at J St.
Perhaps you don’t really mean this, but I’ve seen you condition your criticism on others’ criticism many, many times. Perhaps you only mean it figuratively so, but I still find it disturbing.
I don’t wait for the Palestinians to be angry about Hamas when Israel carries out its own share of disasters… each is worthy of condemnation regardless of the other.
Perhaps it is most disturbing for me, because I loathe relativism and to see it used to further a stance is bothering.
You think I should be outraged that George Soros has given $750K to J St. over the past 3 yrs (& only 8% of its revenues instead of the 33% which the Washington Times claimed)??? Why? I wish he’d given more. Now, when that hypocrite tells me he’s opposed to Republican 504 groups doing the same exact thing, THEN he can tallk.
Stop the whining about relativism & other such nonsense.