Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for December, 2010

Iran’s Defense Minister Denounces Israel’s Role in Asgari’s Suspected Death, IDF Warns of Iranian Revenge Attacks

Wednesday, December 29th, 2010

The Kabuki-like drama of the suicide/murder of Iranian Revolutionary Guard general Ali Reza Asgari in Ayalon Prison continues to deepen.  Today, Ynetnews reports that the IDF circulated an unprecedented warning letter to all reserve officers warning them that Iranian agents might take revenge on them inside Israel or abroad.

What’s astonishing about this is that until now Israelis could always count on being immune to retaliatory domestic terror attacks from foreign enemies like Syria, Iran, Hezbollah, etc.  Israel was impregnable from that perspective.  Palestinian terror attacks have of course happened.  But they were indiscriminate, and except in very rare instances did not kill senior IDF officers or political leaders.  But now even Israel is conceding that it is not as inviolate as it previously believed.

The rationale for the warning letter makes very little sense unless you read between the lines and know about my own reporting on Asgari’smurder .  Here’s how Ynet portrays it:

Israel Defense Forces reserve officers are urged to take extra precautions following the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists: A detailed letter was sent Wednesday to a series of reserve officers, instructing them how to conduct themselves in Israel and abroad.

The officers were asked to replace the supermarket they shop in frequently and to avoid travelling on regular routes. The procedures are aimed at thwarting an attempt by terrorist organizations to target these people, some of whom are still holding key roles in the military reserve force.

The letter, signed by Brigadier-General Kobi Barak, head of operations at the General Staff, explains that the increased fear stems from recent events, including the death of Iranian nuclear scientists in Tehran last month.

Barak also mentioned the February 2008 assassination of senior Hezbollah commander Imad Mugniyah in an explosion in Damascus, after which the Shiite group’s Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah vowed to avenge his death.

He noted that last month a pro-Palestinian organization published the personal details of some 200 officers and soldiers who took part in Operation Cast Lead, claiming that they were war criminals. Some of them even had threatening letters sent to their homes.

Brigadier-General Barak called on the officers to brief their family members on the situation and pay attention to any suspicion vehicles, unusual activity or unknown people wandering near their homes. The officers were also asked to “disrupt their routine,” which Barak defined as “our weak point”. According to the document, the officers must avoid repeating activities over time, like travelling on the same traffic routes or shopping for groceries at the same place.

The letter advises the officers to check their cars in the morning before driving them, examine their mail and avoid accepting unexpected packages. When they are abroad, the officers are urged not to stay in hotels defense officials are not familiar with and to reserve rooms which are not located next to the elevator or staircase.

Here’s where the Kabuki comes in. It makes no sense for a letter to warn IDF officers about Iranian attacks on them in retaliation for events which happened months to years ago. And in the case of the Cast Lead veterans list, it wasn’t compiled by or distributed by Iran, nor did it threaten any IDF veteran with violence.

Even in the case of the recent assassination and severe wounding of two Iranian scientists, Iran blamed Israel but never overtly threatened to take revenge.

No, for the real reason motivating this warning I believe you have to look to the suicide/murder of Asgari reported here in the past few days. While Iran certainly would be angry with killings of its nuclear scientists, the outright murder of one of its generals and senior ministers would rankle even more since Israel kidnapped him, likely tortured him and drained him of whatever useful intelligence he might offer concerning his work as liaison to Hezbollah and more, then possibly murdered him in a dark Israeli prison.  For those who understand the outpouring of emotion and trauma that accompanied the capture and eventual death in captivity of IAF pilot Ron Arad (an event Israel believed Asgari played some role in), imagine the average Iranian feeling the same sense of national outrage.

This news, Israel fears, will truly provoke a violent reaction in Teheran. Hence the warning letter.

There are a few other interesting phenomena to note regarding the letter. Assuming Asgari was murdered, what better way to deflect blame and attention both within Israel and abroad than to warn of an imminent (trumped-up) revenge terror attack planned by Iran. There is nothing like a terror warning to make Israelis scramble into their personal and ideological bunkers. When the security apparatus engages in such domestic hasbara, it diverts the average Israeli from spending any time thinking that the Mossad, Shabak or Aman may be corrupt or homicidal, or that its flagrant, bellicose actions might threaten a war with Iran.

The warning letter is thus a form of domestic psyops designed to work on the Israeli population. It is also designed to have a similar effect internationally. If the Israeli defense establishment warns of an impending attack by Iran, the Israelis will be hoping that everyone will rally round the flag to defend little David under attack by big, bad Goliath Iran.

Perhaps most importantly, it also serves to deflate any pressure on Israel to account for Asgari.  If the former can persuade the world it is in imminent danger of attack, then no one in their right mind would charge Israel with murder and demand that it explain what happened to Asgari, how he ended up in Ayalon Prison, or how he died.  Yes, this is a rather clever piece of psyops.  I hope it won’t work.  And I hope we and the world media can keep the pressure on and press for answers.

Iran’s Press TV reports that the country’s defense minister has denounced the death of Asgari and attributed it to Israel:

Iran’s defense minister says the suspected death of Iranian prisoner Ali-Reza Asgari in an Israeli prison is another test for those who internationally advocate human rights.

If the credibility of this report is proved, the dossier on Israel’s kidnappings, assassinations and murders will become thicker, Brigadier General Ahmad Vahidi said on Wednesday.

“This inhumane action is another test for the international community which advocates human rights,” he added.

Vahidi said Asgari’s abduction by Israel’s intelligence service is certain, adding that after kidnapping the Iranian national, the Israelis tried to cover up their action by spreading the rumor that he had sought asylum in a third country.

The Iranian defense minister said Iran would use all its capabilities and capacities to determine Asgari’s fate.   Vahidi said that such actions only serve to create public hatred for the US and Britain, which are the main supporters of Israel.

Unlike yesterday’s statement by a deputy foreign minister, the more senior defense minister was slightly more circumspect in allowing for the fact that my report may be wrong.  But he clearly placed enough stock in it to make the declaration he did.

It’s worth noting that Yossi Melman devotes part of today’s Haaretz column, called suggestively The Prison Service Covering for Mossad [Wrongdoing], to debunking the claim that Asgari ever came to Israel willingly as a defector or against his will.  But he goes on to scold the Mossad for being unwilling to reveal its secrets even when they do damage to Israel’s reputation.  This passage (from the English translation, which is flawed and incomplete but at least accurate in this portion) in particular struck me:

It would be better were Israel to realize that in some cases the publication of information, no matter how inconvenient and painful it might be to a government body, is preferable to concealing it and allowing an irresponsible, damaging rumor mill to grind on.

Even Melman the skeptic is claiming there is a hidden truth here the Mossad refuses to reveal because it will injure its reputation.  Reading between the lines, Melman seems to be saying that someone died at the hands of the Mossad, but that it wasn’t Asgari.  This certainly raises many more questions than it answers.  Stay tuned…

NOTE: Apparently, some international news agencies have picked up my reporting through its republication in the Eurasia Review.  Unfortunately, ER did not properly link to, or credit this blog as the original source of the story.  As a result it is not being properly credited in some media circles.

Iranian General Murdered in Israel’s Ayalon Prison?

Monday, December 27th, 2010
ynet screenshot of gagged prisoner x suicide story

Screenshot of expunged Ynet story about Prisoner X's suicide

Hold on to your hats because this post is going to be a wild ride.  New and astonishing developments in the case of Prisoner X, known to a source within Ehud Barak’s inner circle as Ali Reza Asgari, retired Iran Revolutionary Guard general and former deputy defense minister.

I exposed the name of Prisoner X here a few weeks ago.  Today, brings news from Israel that Asgari is dead in his cell.  According to the standard version, he committed suicide in his cell within the past week or so.  Ynet reported the suicide story and noted that it was under gag order.  Of course, this story was erased from the internet, but I’m posting a copy of the article which was taken down from the Ynet site.

What is so interesting about this story is that you have to combine two different articles (the second from Haaretz) to gain more insight into what really happened here.  The Haaretz article, which was not removed under gag order because it was written in a sufficiently vague form that it could slip under the gag order, noted that there are investigations of those who die while in secret detention (the case with Asgari).  One of the considerations in such an inquiry is whether a “government agency” may have caused the death:

ali reza asgari murdered in israeli prison

Ali Reza Asgari, Iranian general murdered by Mossad in Ayalon Prison?

Did such an agency have an interest in silencing the detainee?  And if so, was a death declared a “suicide,” really murder? In the case of the death of a prisoner under special treatment [held by the security services], why it was not within the power of the Prison Service to prevent the suicide or some other form of violent death.

I should also confirm at this point that my original source for this story reaffirms specifically that it is Asgari, and not some other secret security prisoner who died.  My source, I should add, only confirms the “official” government version that he committed suicide and not that he was murdered.

This raises the question: why was Asgari considered so hot a figure that someone in the security services may’ve wanted him dead?  It should be noted that it would’ve have been relatively easy for someone to kill Asgari.  An earlier Ynet article, also gagged, noted that he was held incommunicado and had no contact whatsoever with the prison guards or other authorities.  Any prisoner held under such extreme conditions of isolation could be killed at will.

It gives me very little pride as a blogger/journalist to say that the news of his incarceration exposed here may’ve made him a marked man.  No one wishes to be in the most remote way the cause of another’s death.  But the reasons I wrote what I did were honorable and intended to break the stranglehold and impunity of the Israeli security apparatus.  If I am right I regret to say that Ali Reza Asgari has been sacrificed on this altar.  He is a victim of the Israeli secret police and I only hope his death will not have been in vain. It is they, and no one else including me, who is responsible for his death.

Why kill him?  It would be incredibly difficult to explain to the world how and why Israel held a senior Iranian official in one of its prisons when it was telling the world he was enjoying his new life as a defector in Virginia.  It would enormously complicate relations with Turkey (on whose soil he was abducted) and Iran (with whom Israel is almost in a state of war).  It also seems likely that the security services, as I guessed in my earlier post, must’ve exhausted the useful information they could get from him.  And so in yet another sense he was expendable.

But expendable for whom?  It would appear that the Mossad, which originally kidnapped him would be the main culprit.  If he was murdered, the authors of this crime must’ve figured that it would be that much more difficult for anyone to pursue his trail if they murdered him than if he remained alive.  The question now becomes what they’ve done with his body.  Will they make it too disappear as they did Asgari himself when they kidnapped him in Istanbul in 2007?  This would be the ultimate insult and would render his killers virtual impunity for the crime.  His family, which protested in Teheran last month on the anniversary of his fourth year in captivity, will have no body to mourn, no one to bury.  One wonders whether, as in China, at some unspecified future date, Israel will offer the family what’s left of him plus a bill for his execution.  I apologize for the darkness of this comment, but how else is one supposed to react to this abomination?

A word about the official version of suicide: originally the Mossad put out the story that Asgari hadn’t been kidnapped and wasn’t in Israel.  Both of these stories appear to have been false.  The suicide story appears equally self-serving.  Remember too that the Mossad’s method of killing Mahmoud al-Mabouh in Dubai allowed the world to believe he has died of a heart attack.  Only a far more sophisticated toxic screen determined that he’d been drugged as part of a murder.  So the Mossad is very good at these smokescreens when it wants to cover the tracks of its murders.  And further, Amir Oren is implicitly telling his readers, under the strictures of the gag which demand Kabuki-like forms of communication, that our prisoner was murdered and didn’t commit suicide.

What is especially stupid about this murder is that it virtually destroys the a ability of any western intelligence agency to encourage any Iranian to defect.  Can you imagine an interchange between a prospective defector and his handler?  Look what you did to Asgari.  You expect me to expose myself to the possibility of such a fate?

And what will this do to future cooperation among intelligence agencies who may be running Iranian spies and potential defectors?  If rumors are correct and Asgari was lured to Istanbul by a German BND-run false flag operation, and then rendered to the Mossad after capture, why would any such agency willingly cooperate with Israel in future, unless the goal is to glean as much information as possible from such a figure and then kill him when he becomes inconvenient.

This story cries out for further exposure on the part of the western and Israeli media.  Frankly, so far I have found it impossible to place this story in a more MSM publication.  Two Israeli journalists discovered that they couldn’t get permission to interview me about the story.  And other western media have not been willing to publish my research.  Let’s hope with this alarming news that will change.

Otherwise, Asgari will be yet another almost anonymous statistic in the rapidly heating Cold War between Israel and Iran.

Writing in 972 Magazine, Dimi Reider has captured the implicit meaning of Amir Oren’s Haaretz report as well (that the Ayalon prisoner was murdered, rather than committed suicide). He did so independent of any conversation with me. To be fair, Dimi doesn’t agree with my identification of the prisoner with Ali Reza Asgari.

There is one notable caveat:the Israeli NGO, Zaka, which reports all unnatural deaths in the country, says on its website that the Ayalon prisoner was age 32 and died on December 15th. Asgari is in his 50s. So either Zaka reported incorrect information or the man who died is not him. But even if it is not, the likelihood remains that this prisoner was murdered while in detention, a grave crime.

Wikileaks: State Department Lied, Denying Dubai Asked for Assistance in Tracking Mossad Assassins

Sunday, December 26th, 2010
dubai mossad credit card dataList submitted by Dubai to State Dept. of credit cards used by Mossad killers

On February 25, 2010, State Department spokesperson Philip Crowley lied when he told a press conference that he wasn’t aware of any request from Dubai for assistance in tracking the Mossad killers of Mahmoud al-Mabouh.  To those who say that Wikileaks hasn’t told us anything we didn’t already know–think again.

Wikileaks has just released a February 24, 2010 cable in which the embassy relays the specific credit card numbers used by 14 of the 27 known Mossad suspects to State with a request for assistance from authorities investigating the killing, and confirms that the UAE foreign minister made the exact same request directly to Secretary Clinton on February 23rd:

On the margins of a meeting with visiting Secretary [of Energy] Chu, on Feb 24 MFA Minister of State Gargash made a formal request to the Ambassador for assistance in providing cardholder details and related information or credit cards reportedly issued by a U.S. bank to several suspects in last month’s killing of Hamas leader Mahmoud Al-Mabhouh in Dubai.   According to a letter Gargash gave the Ambassador (which transmitted details of the request from Dubai Security authorities to the UAE Central Bank), the credit cards were issued by MetaBank, in Iowa.

Comment: Ambassador requests expeditious handling of and reply to the UAEG request, which was also raised by UAE Foreign Minister Abdullah bin Zayed in a February 23 meeting with Secretary Clinton in Washington.

Twelve of the cards were provided by MetaBank and Payoneer, the latter a payment processing service with close ties to Israeli intelligence services.

At the time, I expressed strong doubts about the interest on the part of the U.S. in playing any constructive role in rooting out these killers.  Which of course is tremendously ironic considering that we’re the ones wagging our fingers at Muslim states for not doing enough to root out terror from their midst.  Here we have a case of Israeli intelligence committing cold-blooded murder, using the financial services of U.S. companies to do so, and we take a pass on investigating or cooperating.  How do you spell h-y-p-o-c-r-i-s-y?

Yesterday, I reported that incoming Mossad director Tamir Pardo was prepared to concede Israeli responsibility for the Dubai hit.  To any who might view this as an Israeli official seeking to take responsibility for Israeli misdeeds or some such…Wikileaks is rumored to be about to publish cables in which the lid is blown on Mossad involvement.  So it’s no skin off Pardo’s back if he admits to a crime which was about to be exposed anyway by others.

New Mossad Chief Makes Nice to Brits

Saturday, December 25th, 2010
mossad cloned british passport

Mossad cloned this British passport for use in the Dubai assassination

Israel’s new Mossad chief, Tamir Pardo (who was named here days before his official appointment, breaking an Israeli gag order) has, according to the Telegraph’s Gordon Thomas (known for spinning a few fancy fictions about the Mossad), arranged for a meeting next month with his British counterparts to apologize for the agency’s cloning of the passports of a dozen British citizens in its hit against Hamas senior operative, Mahmoud al-Mabouh, in Dubai.  According to Thomas, he will promise never to abuse British passports again in such an Israeli operation.  Of course, the problem is that in the 1980s Israel did precisely the same thing and promised the Thatcher government it would never abuse British sovereignty again.  Guess what happened?  And can you ever believe these guys?

Britain, in retaliation for the flagrant offense, expelled Mossad’s London station chief and put all intelligence coordination on hold, a major blow not  just to substantive Mossad spy activity, but also to its prestige.

The redeeming circumstance for Israel that Thomas has dug up in this case is that Pardo, then Mossad number 2, allegedly opposed use of foreign passports for the operation and was overruled by the big, bad then-agency chief, Meir Dagan.  So Dagan gets to be the bad guy, with the hope being that the new guy, Pardo, cleans up the mess his former boss made and all is well in this best of all possible spy worlds.

Pardo, according to Thomas, will bring all sorts of peace offerings and other techno-goodies in his sulha with the heads of MI5 and MI6, foreign minister Hague and home secretary May.  He will bring new face recognition software which may (or may not) help identify the killers of MI6 codebreaker, Gareth Williams.   What is of course deliciously ironic about this is that the Dubai police used their own facial recognition software to identify the Israeli agents who murdered al-Mabouh.  Maybe Pardo should be making his next trip to Dubai to check out the competition?

He will also feed his British counterparts more of that good spook stuff that Mossad peddles concerning Iran  (and hope they credit it).  Thomas notes that Mossad is one of the few western intelligence agencies with agents inside Iran.  My hunch is that what he really means is that the Israelis have cooked up a marriage of convenience with the Mujahadeen a-Khalq (MKO) and Jundallah, whereby the latter provide agents to plant bombs to kill Iranian scientists.

Similarly, the Mossad has been known to plant Iranian government forgeries with its MKO friends, who trumpet the fakes to the world as legitimate documents proving Iran is developing a nuclear trigger device, or whatever fraud of the moment Mossad is attempting to pass off as bona fide.  That’s, I think what Thomas really means when he says Mossad has agents in Iran.  It doesn’t really.  It has collaborators in the sense that the U.S. collaborated with the Afghani mujahadeen against the Soviets in the 1970-80s.  And look where that got us.

I find it interesting and suggestive that Thomas has Pardo offering to expand its surveillance of  Russia’s SVR foreign intelligence agency (remember, the Russians assassinated a turncoat agent in London several years ago and relations have never been the same with the Putin government).

A few months ago, a senior Russian spy operative was mysteriously assassinated in Syria.  He was rumored to have been deeply involved in arming Syrian and Hezbollah.  Suspicion fell, as it often does in such circumstances, on the Israelis, though many thought even Israel would not have the b&$$s to take out one of Putin’s top foreign agents.

One wonders whether Israel is trying to subtly pass along a message to the Russians that if they don’t play ball concerning Iran (stopping its involvement with the Bushehr reactor, cancelling anti-aircraft contracts, approving sanctions, etc.) that Israel will do its best to make its life miserable in whatever ways small and large it can.  And of course two can play at this game as well…

My guess is that there are other matters in bilateral British-Israeli relations that be in play as well.  Israel desperately wants its generals and political leaders to be able to spread the Good News about Israel in Britain, but they’ve been prevented from doing so by a series of nasty arrest warrants taken out by human rights activists.  They threaten to dump Israel’s representatives in a British prison in consideration of possible war crimes charges against them (remember Operation Cast Lead?).

I’m guessing that Prime Minister Cameron may be negotiating some sort of package deal of Israeli promises and British counter-promises whereby each side will be able to say it got something worthwhile out of the deal.  My hope of course is that this isn’t the case and that Parliament will not squash the provision allowing for international war crimes arrest warrants in Britain.  But it’s possible the Cameron government will do its best to do away with this excellent measure allowing for accountability for those who may be guilty of war crimes.

The question is whether Thomas’ report has merit and such a meeting will happen; and whether the Brits will be lulled by the fairy dust Pardo will sprinkle on them.

Related articles

Horowitz’s Seattle Bus Ad: Taking Leave of His Senses

Friday, December 24th, 2010
horowitz bus ad

David Horowitz's proposed Seattle bus ad: lies and the lying liars who tell them

One of my readers has provided the graphic for the ad David Horowitz proposed displaying on Seattle Metro buses.  And I think finally the man has truly taken leave of his senses.  Let’s leave aside the fact that there have been no bus bombings in Israel for years.  But who in their right mind claims that Palestinian terror is financed by the U.S. taxpayer?

While I’ve disagreed with the over the top rhetoric of the Mideast Awareness Campaign in claiming outright Gaza war crimes (before they’ve been proven in a court like the ICC), it is an incontrovertible fact that Israel uses its $3 billion yearly military aid package to purchase sophisticated weaponry routinely used in wars like Lebanon and Gaza.  So American taxpayers do, in that sense, participate directly or indirectly in the oppression of the Occupation.

But to claim that we also support or finance Palestinian terror is simply way out there in some sort of Islamophobic nether world.  This is precisely the point I made in yesterday’s post about why we need more, not less speech.  Horowitz’s add SHOULD be displayed on Seattle buses.  I want everyone to see what an idiot he is.  I want him to make a fool of himself.  This is the marketplace of ideas and the way you determine what ideas are useful and what ideas are worthless.

And to make one point clear, I have no problem with the notion that there have been acts committed by Palestinians which may constitute war crimes.  So let’s let the ICC determine this issue.  Let’s bring both parties to the Hague and determine their guilt or innocence.

Seattle Metro Bus Ad Controversy: King County Suspends Free Speech

Thursday, December 23rd, 2010
seattle israel bus ad

Seattle's anti-war bus ads

Like a good general, I have a rule I try to follow about blogging: I try to choose the terrain on which I will fight.  I like the terrain to favor me.  If my opponent chooses to fight on their terrain, I prefer not to engage unless I think it’s favorable to me.  That’s why I’ve declined to enter into the local fracas-become international cause celebre involving a series of Seattle Metro Bus ads which decry U.S. military aid to Israel and accuse it of committing war crimes during Operation Cast Lead.

Before entering this political swamp, let me make something clear: I have no problem with any of the issues raised in the ads, which is why I strongly attack King County executive Dow Constantine’s decision to pull the plug on them after an outcry from a local Israel lobby coalition.  I strongly support the right of the group which organized them to display them.  The issue of U.S. military aid to Israel is an important one as is the even more important issue of possible war crimes committed by the IDF in Gaza during the last war.

But I do have problem with both sides of this debate: both the advertisers and the pro-Israel baying chorus trying to take them down.  First, my problem with the ad.  If you want to make a political point AND influence people you make your argument coherent and plausible.  You don’t flaunt rhetoric.  You don’t score points.  You don’t shout when a calm voice will do.  There are thousands of different iterations of this ad which would’ve worked as effectively and made it harder for the pro-Israel crowd to get the ads taken down.

But the ad organizers went for the jugular.  They made their choice and undoubtedly are happy their ads were banned since it will play well to their constituency.  The other side will think it has won a victory and feel pleased with itself.  What it won’t realize is that any time you have to win a victory at the expense of fundamental constitutional principles of free speech and fairness, you’ve lost in the long run.  Meaning Israel has lost too.  And if your cause is Israel, then you’ve done your cause a disservice.

Now my much more serious problems with the smear campaign run by the local pro-Israel advocates including the Jewish federation, Aipac, American Jewish Committee and Stand With Us.  Here’s some of their rhetoric as mouthed by local King County Councilmember Jane Sprague, who’s dutifully repeating the Israel lobby talking points as all obedient U.S. politicians tend to do:

The ad reads “Israeli War Crimes Your tax dollars at work,” and has an image of a group of children staring at a destroyed building.  . Like many of you, I find the ad disturbing. Yesterday I sent a letter to the Executive and Metro officials demanding that they put a halt the ads…

We need to be mindful that inflammatory speech like this can affect many groups including our Jewish Community. I strongly believe in freedom of speech and our first amendment rights…Messages like these, that lack basic civility, can incite violence against minorities and various religious communities. We need to be able to protect those who can be hurt as a result.

What is “inflammatory” about this speech? That it accuses Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza? Major Israeli newspapers run stories virtually every day recounting stories of Israeli atrocities during the war and using terms like “war crimes” to describe them. Yes, I’d prefer to use terms like “alleged” or “possible” since the war crimes haven’t been proven in a court of law yet. But I find absolutely nothing wrong with putting forward a political argument in such ads claiming that Israel committed war crimes.

Now, as to whether U.S. taxpayers financed those atrocities with U.S. military aid: that seems incontrovertible. Israel’s military has used American weaponry liberally and even flagrantly in situations such as the mass firing of U.S. cluster bombs during the concluding hours of the 2006 Lebanon war, leaving Lebanese civilians to suffer the tragic consequences after the war ended as they unintentionally exploded the ordinance on their property and roads.

As to the ads “lacking basic civility,” well, excuse me but a cluster bomb in your backyard or an F-16 levelling your Gaza apartment building is a pretty uncivil message sent from the American people to Palestinians courtesy of the Israeli Air Force. Do the American people deserve the right to know about such things in bus ads? You bet.

But there is another deeply disturbing notion put forward by pro-Israel advocates in this message: that Israel=American Jews. That Americans somehow blame their fellow Jewish citizens for the acts of Israel. This is not only an offensive concept, it simply isn’t true.  America is not a place in which Jews will be blamed for Israel’s alleged crimes.  I reject this notion.

The anti-ad coalition views Israel and world Jewry as being inseparable, as being joined at the hip. But the vast majority of Jews in the world don’t accept this equation. I am a Jew, not an Israeli. Israel doesn’t speak for me, nor I for Israel. When Israel acts badly, I am not at fault nor do my fellow Americans see as such.

But it is convenient for Stand With Us and the rest of the Israel advocates to claim there is “no daylight” between Israel and us because then they can argue that hostility to Israeli policy=anti-Israelism and even anti=Semitism. Let me point out as clearly as I can: this notion is noxious. It is offensive. I utterly reject it as should all Americans and American Jews who care about Israel.

Israel doesn’t need all Jews to identify with it unconditionally. Israel need to become a normal nation in the Middle East. To do so, it needs to come to terms with its Arab neighbors. Having world Jewry’s identity confused with Israel’s will not help this process. It will indeed poison it. If you want to be a friend to Israel tell it to make peace with its neighbors and not presume all the Jews in the world think everything it does is honky dory.

King County’s executive has done a grave disservice to free speech in suspending these ads. Not only this, he has handed a victory to those sponsoring the ads.  He has given them the high ground. I hope they sue the county and get a judge to rule on this situation. It is really a contract dispute. The County signed a contract and then violated it. Grounds for reneging are specious. Metro approved those ads then took the Mideast Awareness Campaign’s $3,000.  After signing on the dotted line, they want to back out.  I’d love to see this tested in court.

Dow Constantine is a craven political coward.  Read the bullshit that he’s published under the name of the King County government:

“I have consulted with federal and local law enforcement authorities who have expressed concern, in the context of this international debate, that our public transportation system could be vulnerable to disruption.”

…Given the dramatic escalation of debate in the past few days over these proposed ads, and the submission of inflammatory response ads, there is now an unacceptable risk of harm to or disruption of service to our customers should these ads run.”

Yes, ads that are political speech and counter-speech will cause terrorism.  That’s what he’s essentially claiming.  Thank God, this is a view fully rejected by our nation’s Founders.  Speech is speech.  It is not an act and certainly not an illegal act.  What utter nonsense.  To retreat behind the skirts of a nameless federal bureaucrat who supposeldy told him to can an ad.  I want to know: which federal official did he consult and what did he say?  In fact, I’d like to file a Freedom of Information Act petition with Country government for every piece of internal information regarding this ad.  So, Dow Constantine, I’d be careful what you say and make sure it’s the truth.  You wouldn’t want to look awfully stupid if you mouthed nonsense like this, and were caught afterward doing so.

In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if David Horowitz’s counter ads were deliberately formulated in the most vitriolic terms possible, knowing that by doing so they would virtually force Metro to cancel the original ad, which was their real purpose.  Really, who cares what the counter ads would say as long as they didn’t explicitly advocate illegality or violence?  I’d like to see fools like Horowitz and his ilk voice anti-Muslim views on Seattle buses so the entire city can laugh them out of town.  What’s the cure to bad speech?  More speech.  Not no speech.  What Metro is doing is saying Seattleites are delicate flowers who can’t withstand the furor of political debate.  Somehow they must be protected from opinions that are too hot.  Otherwise, what?  What would happen?  Would the Seattle explode in WTO type riots merely because of a few bus ads?  C’mon.  Who’re they kidding.

You’ve heard conservatives deride the “Nanny State.”  Well, here in Seattle we have the “Nanny County” protecting residents from the bad, bad man saying bad, bad things.  I say let 1,000 flowers bloom.  So what if some are weeds?  A weed here or there won’t kill us.  It’s the garden of debate that is important.

U.S. Military Attache in Israel: Ahmadinejad Like ‘Little German Guy With Moustache’

Wednesday, December 22nd, 2010
lt col rick burgess

Lt. Col. Rick Burgess has drunk the Israeli Kool-Aid

From the looks of it, the job of the U.S. military attache in Tel Aviv is to echo the views of Israel’s leaders, generals and spymasters.  Otherwise, how does one account for the fact that in his farewell interview with the IDF magazine, BaMachaneh, Lt. Col. Rick Burgess likened Iran’s president to Adolph Hitler and claimed that Israel and the world were now facing a time like the 1930s when the Nazis came to power?

Ahmadinejad returns us to a scenario of the little guy with the moustache of the 1930s.

Interestingly, Burgess reassures the reporter that the strained relations between the Obama administration and Israel’s government are like those of “husband and wife,” which would mean, I suppose, that Israel and the U.S. are married.  I would think that there would be either a U.S. law or at least State Department memorandum prohibiting countries from marrying each other.  It seems a highly dubious way of conducting foreign relations, let alone marital relations.

Regarding Wikileaks and its impact on Israel-U.S. relations, Burgess marvels that Israel has turned it into a positive.  Those documents that were leaked concerning Iran:

Confirmed what the U.S. and Israel have been saying [about Iran] for a long time: that there are other nations [in the region] as concerned about it as we are.

According to his appraisal, Iran was the most important subject he faced during his 18-month tenure as military attaché.  He dealt with it from his first day on the job until the day of his interview.  Nothing was more important.  Gee, it makes you wonder what this guy’s priorities were and it also indicates why U.S. policy is so screwed up.  Israel and the U.S. are, in Burgess’ view, in the same boat regarding Iran’s nuclear threat and it’s only natural that they collaborate the danger it poses, as they have in other military matters.  It’s the reason we share intelligence as well, he says, though he won’t go into which material or how much is shared.  To the interviewer’s question whether “our friends in the U.S.” would decide to assist us if we attack Iran or prefer not to open a second front against her, Burgess demurred with the conventional “all options remain open.”  This would include, according to the attaché:

…Active defensive measures on the part of Israel and the U.S.  Israel has the right to defend itself.  And if Israel and the U.S. decide that this is the best way to protect Israel or the region in general, it [Israel] will do so [attack Iran]…It’s a frightening thought that Iran wants to be a world power and leader of the Islamic world and everything it does points in those directions.

Interesting that a discussion of attacking Iran invokes the notion that this somehow contains an element of self-defense  on Israel’s and America’s part.  The notion that Iran seeks to be a world power is laughable though of course it legitimately seeks to play a role in the Islamic world.  But the notion that this is an urge on Iran’s part that must be checked by an assault on that country is passing strange.

Burgess also discusses his conversations with senior Israeli leaders who told him:

Remember the 30s and the little guy with the moustache who said all those things about the Jews?  People said he didn’t mean what he said.  That he wouldn’t do anything,  and look what happened.  At the end of the day, if you take a leader like Ahmadinejad and give his maximal power you will get a return of the 1930s era with the little guy with the moustache.  This is a danger that Israel cannot afford.

To which I reply, the world cannot afford to entertain Israel’s delusions that events from history are repeating themselves.  This is a problem of Israeli psychopathology for which it needs treatment, not the enabling of friends (or “wives”) like the United States and its military attaches.  I for one abhor Israel’s misuse of Jewish history in this fashion.  One tenet of Jewish philosophy I learned in my college Judaica courses was that the Holocaust was sui generis, in other words it was a unique historical event having no parallel.  While subsequent contemporary historical events in Rwanda, Cambodia and elsewhere have proven this claim wrong; what IS true is that there is no historical parallel in modern Jewish life for the Holocaust.  Iran is not Nazi Germany, today in not the 1930s, Ahmadinejad is not Hitler.  And anyone who makes such spurious claims does so for purely partisan political interests and does a grievous injustice to the real suffering of Jewish victims of that era.

Burgess also uses a strange analogy to describe broadening U.S. relations with Lebanon.  Speaking in the metaphor of the telenovela, it’s as if Israel is the lover the U.S. knows but Lebanon is the “hot new babe.”  He is speaking of the $400 million in military armaments the U.S. provided to strengthen the Lebanese army.  Naturally, the IDF worries that this materiel will end up strengthening Hezbollah in its fight against Israel.

When asked about how the disagreement over Israel’s refusal to lengthen its settlement freeze affected U.S. relations he turns to another analogy:

There may be decisions that are made on the political level that diminish military coöperation, but it’s like relations between a husband and wife: relations remain stable, but this doesn’t mean that we agree on everything.  Like, for example the issue of how to raise the children…

And to top all this nonsense off he adds an impossibly trite comparison between Israelis and Americans:

Israelis truly are sabras [cactuses], inside they are warm and open.  That’s what I love about Israel.  It’s truthful and real.  In America there is a tendency to be quite superficial [keep in mind this dude lives in Nevada!].  In Israel someone might call you an idiot and cut you off on the road, but here there is more depth, more truthfulness.

What can only wonder what this guy’s been smokin,’ or given that he’s a military officer, drinking.

To prove that Burgess does have some ability to understand the inadequacies of Israeli policy, after a conversation in which he railed about Israeli driving and poor parking habits he liken Israel’s government to a bad driver:

Israel too parks its car in the middle of the roadway at times, but not because it understands [that this is wrong], but rather because it feels that this is the right thing to do.  Israel  has an attitude: “I will do whatever is necessary to protect myself.”  As for consequences, it will worry about those later.

Wikileaks: Mossad Sells U.S. on Iran Regime Change Plan

Tuesday, December 21st, 2010

Consider this reverse scenario: four separate planes carrying hundreds of IDF soldiers crash in a single year all due to mysterious circumstances not traceable to mechanical or human failure.  Israeli nuclear scientists die in bombings and under other violent circumstances.  Retired Israeli generals and a deputy defense minister are  kidnapped and spirited to Teheran.  Mysterious explosions at Israeli missile bases leave scores dead.  And a mysterious computer worm leaves the Dimona nuclear reactor virtually incapacitated.  Whenever asked about any of these incidents Iranian politicians and military officers smile knowingly while Iranian media are filled with stories trumpeting the derring-do of its intelligence services.  Finally, various Iranian generals, intelligence directors and political leaders publicly call for regime change in Israel, a full-fledged assault on Israel to force it to renounce its nuclear program, end the Occupation and topple the current government.

Put the shoe on the other foot and think how Israel would react if it came under the type of attack to which Israel is subjecting Iran.  Of course, Israel would react with full scale war.  It would warn Iran that the next such incident would invoke full-fledged hostilities.  And it would be true to its word.  Now compare this with how Iran has reacted to the same types of provocations.  Iran has not declared war on Israel.  It hasn’t demanded a Security Council session to denounce Israeli aggression.  Iran is keeping its cool relatively well considering what it’s facing.  Much better than Israel would under similar circumstances.

newsweek iran cover

Just about everything Mossad 'thinks it knows about Iran is wrong'

On a similar subject, a recently released Wikileaks cable reveals that Mossad chief Meir Dagan met with Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns in August, 2007.  The unbelievably self-serving nonsense that emerged from Israel’s chief intelligence official is astounding.  Among other things, he urged the U.S. to join together with Israel on a plan for regime change:

Turning to Iran, Dagan observed that it is in a transition period. There is debate among the leadership between Rafsanjani and Ahmadinejad and their respective supporters. Instability in Iran is driven by inflation and tension among ethnic minorities. This, Dagan said, presents unique opportunities, and Israelis and Americans might see a change in Iran in their lifetimes. As for Iraq, it may end up a weak, federal state…

Dagan said that more should be done to foment regime change in Iran, possibly with the support of student democracy movements, and ethnic groups (e.g., Azeris, Kurds, Baluchs) opposed to the ruling regime…Iran’s minorities are “raising their heads, and are
tempted to resort to violence.”

Dagan urged more attention on regime change, asserting that more could be done to develop the identities of ethnic minorities in Iran. He said he was sure that Israel and the U.S. could “change the ruling regime in Iran, and its attitude towards backing terror regimes.” He added, “We could also get them to delay their nuclear project. Iran could become a normal state.”

By which Dagan clearly means a state that is obedient to Israeli and U.S. interests.

Clearly, there is coöperation and coördination between the U.S. and Israel regarding covert ops/destabilization efforts against Iran as this passage of the cable indicates:

Covert Measures: Dagan and the Under Secretary agreed not to discuss this approach in the larger group setting.

Given all of the information quoted above it seems entirely credible, even certain that the Mossad, with the collaboration of internal dissident forces like Jundallah and Mujuhadeen e-Khalq, have been responsible for the series of bombings, assassinations and attempts against the lives of political leaders and nuclear scientists within Iran.  The grand plan of the Mossad seems to be to combine paralyzing economic sanctions which provoke instability and unrest, with sabotage and political fragmentation to weaken the regime and eventually topple it.

The language of the cable seems to indicate that the U.S. isn’t quite on board with the regime change aspect of Israel’s plan.  But certainly Dagan is quite content that existing policy and a few energetic shoves of the right direction will bring an end to the Ayatollah regime and replace it with one that is “normal” (whatever that means).  One wonders what might have to be done to create an Israel that its neighbors and the rest of the world might view as “normal.”

The unfortunate truth for Dagan is that at least so far, his grand scheme has come up short.  While Iran is under increasing economic distress as evidenced by yesterday’s quadrupling of the price of gasoline and announcement that other critical subsidies for bread and other necessities would be lessened or phased out, Iran remains a coherent, though troubled state.  While the message doesn’t seem to have been heard in Tel Aviv, the ability of the regime to withstand the discontent following the June election fiasco indicated to any reasonable observer that this was not a political system that would go easily or willingly.  It will take a lot more to topple the mullahs than a couple of bombings and a sabotaged nuclear program.

To put it even more directly, Israeli policy regarding Iran is founded on completely unrealistic, even deluded premises.  As I recently heard former CIA officer Ray McGovern say about U.S. views on Iran’s nuclear program, Israel’s approach to Iran is faith-based rather than evidence-based.  And faith-based policy or intelligence is the absolute worst kind.  You can convince yourself of virtually anything if your analysis is not based on rock-solid evidence and reality, as Israel has done.  Faith-based analysis got us into Iraq and to an extent fueled Obama’s foray into Afghanistan.  Faith-based intelligence policy is hunting down Taliban militants in Pakistan with CIA drones.  None of this will bring the types of changes the U.S. would like to see in the region.  Just as none of the principles Dagan enunciates above will bring the type of result he wishes (a new Iranian regime).