Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for January, 2010

Dershowitz Calls Goldstone ‘Evil,’ ‘Traitor to Jews;’ Shin Bet Urges NIF Investigation

Sunday, January 31st, 2010

Israeli far-right goes 'Der Shturmer' on Naomi Hazan in Jerusalem Post ad.

I’ve never felt this more than tonight.  There is deep evil afoot among elements of the IDF, Shin Bet, and in the halls of hasbara represented by Alan Dershowitz and the like.  Much of it revolves around the hysterical reaction by the Israeli military and political elite to the Goldstone Report.  We knew all this before.  But the attacks have never been so vicious as those of the past few days, bordering on incitement to violence.  The phrases being voiced remind me of the environment just before Yitzchak Rabin was assassinated by the same type of rabid Israeli nationalist as the ones calling for blood from Israeli peace activists.  I know many of us have been critical of the Israeli left and the peace movement.  I remain so.  But it is now time to pick whichever portion of the Israeli left we can most support and do so wholeheartedly.  The Israeli left is under attack as never before.

Two developments in particular have chilled me to the bone, and I thank Jerry Haber for posting about Dershowitz’s latest eruption and Didi Remez for posting about the IDF’s machinations against Prof. Naomi Hazan and New Israel Fund.  And I urge you after reading this to do everything in your power to support the forces under assault.  Make contributions to New Israel Fund.  Send messages of support to Prof. Hazan.  Call your local Israeli consulate to complain about the assaults on her and Justice Goldstone.  This must stop.

I do not have a problem with anyone whether right or left expressing their views on the issues.  It is good to criticize Goldstone or New Israel Fund if you feel they’ve got things wrong.  But it is dead wrong to call your opponent “evil” or use Der Sturmer tactics to turn your opponent into a subhuman (note the rhino horn on Prof. Hazan’s head in the graphic I’ve posted here–the Hebrew word for “Fund” is the same as “horn,” which explains the rather foolish-looking horn on her head).

We MUST turn the conversation away from this assault and back on the substance of the Goldstone Report.  We must support the UN process outlined in Goldstone which could bring the report for consideration by the Security Council and International Court of Justice if the Israelis and Hamas refuse to investigate their misdeeds.  This is where attention needs to be.  And not on accusations of treason and other McCarthyite red herrings.

Please spend time reading the articles linked here and listening to the Dershowitz radio interview and disseminate this as widely as possible with the added message that we will not take our eyes off the ball that is Goldstone.  We will stand by our allies in Israel and outside it when they are under attack.

Alan Dershowitz gave a radio interview to Israeli army radio, Galey Tzahal, in which he launched a full frontal attack on Justice Goldstone.  Keep in mind that the Israeli officials discussing whether and how to create the least effective investigative panel that would satisfy the Goldstone conditions have bandied about the name of this thug as a potential member of the panel.  Here are some of the interview’s key passages:

D: The Goldstone Report is a defamation written by an evil, evil man.  Goldstone is an evil man.  No one should mince words about it.  He allowed his Jewishness, the fact that his name is Goldstone, and that he has connections to Israel–he allowed himself to be used to give…a heksher, a certification of purity to a defamation.

It would be as if the Czar when he wrote the Protocols of the Elders of Zion he asked a prominent to Jew to edit the report and sign the Protocols in order to show that it had credibility.

Galey Tzahal: Do you hint Prof. Dershowitz that he is a moser, someone who betrays his own people?

D: Absolutely.  There is a prayer that is said every day for people like him: La-malshinim al t’hi tikvah (“there shall be no hope for the betrayers”).  He is a man who uses his language, his words against the Jewish people.  I regarded him as a friend.  I now regard his as an absolute traitor.

Eyal Nir, on my Facebook page makes a perceptive comment (Hebrew) about the Protocols: either Dershowitz is claiming that the Protocols were based on true testimony or he’s claiming that Goldstone is the same type of fraud as the Protocols.  Perhaps Dersh wants us the believe Cast Lead never happened or all those Gazan civilians didn’t die?  Can anyone doubt this man is a charlatan?

Later in the interview Dershowitz says he hasn’t been asked to serve on the committee.  With mock modesty he ventured Justice Aharon Barak as a better candidate for the panel.  Jerry Haber points out that when the Goldstone Report was first issued Defense Minister Barak approached Dershowitz and Barak to spearhead the campaign in Israel’s defense.  You can see what Dersh’s reply was.  Barak refused.  And given this performance, how likely does anyone think it will be for Aharon Barak to answer this tainted call to serve?

If you understand Hebrew, also listen to the remainder of the interview with Shulamit Aloni who savages Dershowitz, calling him a “patriot nutcase” and Ehud Barak, saying she believes he deliberately wanted to kill Gaza civilians during Cast Lead.  She also calls him “the most dangerous man in Israel” and a “Napoleon” (which is rendered even funnier by the fact that Barak is quite short).

Didi Remez translates part of the story by Maariv’s Ben Caspit which reveals that the Knesset’s foreign affairs and security committee will deliberate about New Israel Fund’s alleged role in collaborating with the Goldstone Report by passing incriminating IDF documents to it, thereby blackening Israel’s name in the process.  These documents were forwarded to the Attorney General by the Shin Bet, requesting an investigation be launched.

In an earlier story on the affair, Caspit writes this incendiary claptrap about NIF (as reported in Noam Sheizaf’s blog post):

“Israel’s image is at an all-times low. International pressure is mounting, and with it the calls for boycott. All this was fueled by the Goldstone report, which was in itself fueled by Israeli sources. The funding for these sources is provided by, amongst others, the NIF. The question is whether the New Israeli Fund is indeed for Israel.”

Caspit mentions 300 grassroots and social organizations receiving funds through the NIF, and asks: “is all this activity just intended to serve as a front for radical subversive activity, acting against the very foundations of the state?”

Other Knesset members are proposing ending cooperation between all government agencies and NIF grantees (NIF funds various social justice, human rights and anti-poverty NGOs and initiatives in Israeli Jewish and Arab communities).

Far-right Israeli nationalists protest outside Naomi Hazan's home. Placards say: "Love Naomi--Hate Tzahal" (Flash 90)

The far-right nationalist group, Im Tirtzu, is campaigning against NIF and Naomi Hazan, its Israeli chair, placing the ad displayed here in the Jerusalem Post.  The Israeli right have demonstrated outside Hazan’s home dressed in in mock Hamas kefiyes and thanking her for her support.

Here are some of the shenanigans the Israeli right and intelligence services have planned for NIF:

..The materials exposed…are familiar to the IDF authorities and the legal authorities in Israel. Some of them were given half a year ago to the Military Advocate General Brig. Gen. Avichai Mandelblit.He checked the material and gave it to the Atty. Gen., with a recommendation to open an official investigation. No such investigation has been made so far. The Shin Bet is also familiar with the material and the sensitive issue. Taking action against this is not simple because NIF is a registered association in the US. Also, it is noteworthy that a large part of the fund’s activities in Israel are devoted to social and public issues of the first order.

“It will be hard to connect this activity to political subversion,” said a security source, who is well familiar with the affair. “But on the other hand, there is clearly a worrisome pattern here that is causing Israel serious damage and helping its worst critics tie the IDF’s hands and undermine the legitimacy of the Jewish state in general and its right to defend itself in particular.”

Im Tirtzu is now planning to launch a large public campaign, both against the New Israel Fund in general and personally against its head, Prof. Naomi Hazan. Dozens of movement activists demonstrated last night in front of Hazan’s house dressed up as Hamas activists and carried signs thanking Hazan and the fund.

For the past few months and until tonight, I’d broken off contact and support for NIF over the treatment of fellow blogger, Shamai Leibowitz several years ago.  Since Ben Caspit played an instrumental role in this affair as a conduit of the Shin Bet in smearing Shamai, it’s appropriate to bring it up now.  Shamai came to the U.S. to study international human rights and receive a law degree from George Washington University.  He came with the support of an NIF fellowship.  Leibowitz taught a State Department language, culture and politics course for new U.S. diplomats being sent to Israel.  That is, he taught the course until Aipac found out about it and conveyed this information to the Israeli government, which in turn leaked the information to Caspit, who published it as a juicy piece of gossip: defender of convicted terrorist Marwan Barghouti teaching U.S. diplomats about Israeli culture.  You get the drift.  Shamai lost the job.

Later, Shamai made a speech endorsing the BDS movement in Cambridge which was also reported back to the powers that be in Israel.  Such pressure was exerted that NIF dropped Shamai from the program.  When I learned of this I was so angry I wrote to the then NIF director, Larry Garber, berating him for his betrayal of Shamai.  He never responded.  That’s when I cut my ties to NIF.

But as far as I’m concerned, the Israeli power structure is out to castrate NIF and I simply won’t allow it to happen.  It’s all hands on deck.  Do not let this ship go down.

Those of you who follow the Israeli media closely should note the role that Ben Caspit is playing in this little escapade.  Some journalists’ interests are so closely allied with the security services their salaries might as well be paid by them.  Caspit is one such.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

The Beat Goes On: Dershowitz Slanders Me in Jerusalem Post Too, Ghouls Rejoice

Sunday, January 31st, 2010

Recently, I wrote that Alan Dershowitz had published a Huffington Post blog in which he named and quoted from my blog post, The Zionization of Disaster Relief, about Israel’s PR extravaganza in Haiti.  Instead of attributing the blog post to me, the author, and linking to this blog, instead he wrote the following:

The neo-Nazi Web site ReportersNotebook.com features a blog entitled The Zionization of Disaster Relief.

The editors of Huffington Post, after saying they would address the issue, have not yet done so.  Now I discover that Dersh also published this same post on the same date, January 24th, in his Jerusalem Post blog.  I’ve also written to the Post’s editors asking them to correct the record.

Given that I’ve attacked Alan Dershowitz before here, it can be no accident why he formulated his paragraph about my blog post in the fraudulent manner he did.  And now comes circumstantial evidence that this is the case.   An anti-Semitism-obsessed, anti-jihadi, pro-Israel blogger, Adam Holland, has taken up the cudgels.  Holland is also one of Joe Weissman’s buddies, who I’ve also criticized for his jihad against Anglican cleric Stephen Sizer.

Strangely enough, Holland also actually blogs at Daily Kos.  I wonder what credentials got him that gig?  Is being a pro-Israel, Muslim hater sufficient now to get oneself a diary at DK (apologies to a few of my good blogging friends who are DK diarists)?  This is beginning to look like pro-Israel tag team wrestling.  You bad mouth one of theirs and they’ll double team you with some of their big, fat sweaty hack heavyweights.

I’m not even going to get into how badly Holland mischaracterizes my views in the Haiti post I wrote.  More interesting to me is the McCarthyite guilt by association rhetorical style of demagogue-goons like Holland (and Weissman, Horowitz, Pipes and others):

Silverstein’s column has traversed the left-right wormhole and has been published by the neo-Nazi blogger (and David Irving associate) Michael Santomauro at his Reporters Notebook website (read here). Alan Dershowitz read this reposted version of Silverstein’s column and blasted it in a column of his own…Silverstein’s column has also been reposted on Russia’s Pravda English language forum and the Arab website Uruknet.

My work is republished (without my knowledge or permission, but that’s neither here nor there) by a Holocaust revisionist, the discussion forum of a Russian newspaper, and an Arab website–and that makes me…what?  A known associate of organized revisionism, the Russians, and jihadists?

This may satisfy those of little brain among the pro-Israel-obsessed blog world.  They don’t seem to be able to debate honestly or characterize accurately what you write, so they resort to these fraudulent intellectual stunts.  The Who once sang: “We won’t be fooled again.”  Unlike their song, I don’t think anyone is fooled by this narischkeit.

To me, this indicates a deep unease about Israel’s perilous position on the world stage as the Goldstone Report begins to reoccupy headlines and Israel refuses to appoint the investigative commission demanded by the UN panel.  The government has launched a vicious counter-attack against Israeli and international human rights NGOs, Israeli and Palestinian peace activists, the Report itself, and progressive bloggers who attest to the inadequacy of Israel’s response.  The attack is also coordinated along with internet activists recruited by the Foreign Ministry.  Dershowitz and buddies of his like Weissman and Holland also play a useful role.  I call it the vast right-wing hasbara conspiracy-crusade.

Dershowitz and Holland attacked my post because it revealed that the clothes the Haiti hasbara emperor were wearing were hiding the sins of Gaza.  Interesting who they haven’t attacked though–the Israeli doctor (and IDF Lt. Col.) whose newspaper article formed the basis for my article.  My post is 85% Dr. Yoel Donchin‘s article from the Israeli press with 15% commentary written by me.  But it would be much harder to target an experienced medicine specialist from Israel’s Hadassah Hospital as being anti-Israel or loony-left than me (though it won’t succeed with me either).

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

IDF Refuses Gaza War Crimes Investigation: Time for ICC Referral

Saturday, January 30th, 2010

Ashkenazi and Barak: Investigation? We don't want your stinking investigation (Nir Kafri)

Both Israel and Hamas have essentially refused to comply with conditions laid down in the Goldstone Report, which called for a serious investigation by each party of the charges of crimes against civilians during the Gaza war.  Justice Goldstone gave each side three months to reply to this condition and that deadline came Friday.  Each party’s reply was feeble, but Israel’s more feeble since it killed considerably more.

Hamas apologized for the three Israeli civilians it killed and said their death was a “mistake.”  Were it not for an even more feeble Israeli response, Hamas’ would’ve earned the derision it deserved.  But Israel’s was classic and all over the place.  In one government leak, it’s claimed Bibi is willing to appoint an investigative panel that would be enfeebled even before it began; with no subpoena power and extremely limited mandate.  One panel member’s name suggested: Alan Dershowitz!  Now comes word that the IDF itself refuses an external investigation:

…The defense establishment appears to be steadfast in its refusal to have the IDF’s monopoly over examination of its actions challenged.

…Senior Jerusalem officials warned that Israel’s response to the UN will not satisfy the international community and that eventually an examination committee that is outside the IDF will have to be appointed to investigate last year’s military operation in the Gaza Strip.

Senior officials in the Prime Minister’s Bureau say that Netanyahu is inclined to accept the justice and foreign ministries’ call for an additional examination, by an extra-military body, into cases in which innocent civilians were harmed during Operation Cast Lead. Netanyahu is convinced that only an independent probe will convince the international community that Israel is serious in its investigation of alleged violations of the law of war.

Actually, this is laughable because the version of an “independent” probe I outlined above will satisfy no one outside the Israeli government, nor should it.

Here’s why:

“To date,” the Israeli report [to the UN defending Operation Cast Lead states, "the IDF has launched investigations into 150 separate incidents arising from the Gaza Operation. Of the 150 incidents, so far 36 have been referred for criminal investigation.

So with 1,100 Gaza civilians killed, the IDF investigated a total of 150 incidents and found only 36 even worthy of a fuller investigation.  Now, we all know the history of the IDF in investigating itself.  If there is any way it can exonerate itself (and there virtually always is unless the heat is on from international sources) it will.  So you can be sure that of the 36 perhaps one, if you're lucky, might result in any punishment at all.  In fact, the only known discipline I've heard of meted out so far to any IDF soldier for acts committed during Cast Lead was a soldier reprimanded for stealing a Gazan credit card.  1,100 civilians killed and all they could find worth punishing was theft of a crummy credit card!  Really, they must be joking.

So I propose that Ban Ki Moon refer the matter to the Security Council, part of the process Goldstone requested prior to asking the International Criminal Court to take up the case in the event the parties do not investigate their own excesses.  One thing's for sure: as soon as mentions Goldstone and ICC in the same sentence, Bibi will announce with a flourish an "independent" Israeli investigation.  It will, of course be toothless, fragmented and ineffectual.  And here is where the world community will be tested.  Will it be satisfied by yet another Israeli charade; or will it call Israel's bluff and take matters further?  Will Security Council members like the U.S. even let anything close to this happen?  Likely they will not.  But my hope is that Pres. Obama will find some way to exert pressure on Israel whether or not he ends up vetoing such a resolution.

Those of you who follow the State of the Union will note that Pres. Obama ignored the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, meaning it's likely he jettisoned it from his current political agenda (along with health care if you can believe the headlines of the NY Times).  This doesn't bode well for the Goldstone Report's future.  But I still remain hopeful that this document will have staying power and continue to rankle Israel (and to a lesser extent Hamas) until they grapple with it in a serious way.

Breaking the Silence: IDF Women Soldiers Testify to Abuse

Saturday, January 30th, 2010

IDF soldiers beat Palestinian

Breaking the Silence has regularly released eyewitness accounts by IDF soldiers of abuse they either perpetrated or witnessed in their service in the Occupied Territories.  The last round of testimonies concerned Operation Cast Lead.  The latest round concerns female soldiers who recount their own peculiar set of experiences regarding such mistreatment.  Ynetnews features a summary of key accounts.  You can hear them and read the original Hebrew article here.  Here are a few of the more shocking passages:

‘Child’s hand broken on the chair’

A female soldier in Sachlav Military Police unit, stationed in Hebron, recalled a Palestinian child that would systematically provoke the soldiers by hurling stones at them…One time he even managed to scare a soldier who fell from his post and broke his leg.

Retaliation came soon after: “I don’t know who or how, but I know that two of our soldiers put him in a jeep, and that two weeks later the kid was walking around with casts on both arms and legs…they talked about it in the unit quite a lot – about how they sat him down and put his hand on the chair and simply broke it right there on the chair.”

Even small children did not escape arbitrary acts of violence, said a Border Guard female officer serving near the separation fence: “We caught a five-year-old…can’t remember what he did…we were taking him back to the territories or something, and the officers just picked him up, slapped him around and put him in the jeep. The kid was crying and the officer next to me said ‘don’t cry’ and started laughing at him. Finally the kid cracked a smile – and suddenly the officer gave him a punch in the stomach. Why? ‘Don’t laugh in my face’ he said.”

*   *

“Crossing the checkpoint, it’s like another world… Palestinians walk with trolleys on the side of the road, with wagons, donkeys… so the Border Guards take a truck with the remains of food and start throwing it at them… cottage cheese, rotten vegetables… it was the most appalling thing I experienced in the territories.”

The soldier said she tried to protest, but was silenced by the commanding officers. When she tried to go around them to higher authorities, she found a solution. “Almost immediately I got into an officers’ course.”

*   *

Settler children harassing Palestinians

This is perhaps the most disturbing of the stories recounted. As you read it, remember that the Hebron Fund raises millions of American Jewish dollars to support precisely this type of behavior by settler children against innocent Palestinian civilians. It simply breaks my heart for the victims to face such violence perpetrated by Jews, who do so out of some perverted notion that their religion somehow justifies, nay demands such treatment. This literally makes me sick to my stomach not just as a human being, but as a Jew. In fact, I would dare even someone supporting the settlers to try to explain, defend or justify this:

Another female Sachlav soldier told the story of the time an eight-year-old settler girl in Hebron decided to bash a stone into the head of a Palestinian adult crossing her passing by her in the street. “Boom! She jumped on him, and gave it to him right here in the head… then she started screaming ‘Yuck, yuck, his blood is on me’”.

The soldier said the Palestinian then turned in the girl’s direction – a move that was interpreted as a threat by one of the soldiers in the area, who added a punch of his own: “And I stood there horrified… an innocent little girl in her Shabbat dress… the Arab covered the wound with his hand and ran.” She recalled another incident with the same child: “I remember she had her brother in the stroller, a baby. She was giving him stones and telling him: ‘Throw them at the Arab‘.”

Where does such hate come from? How can it be justified? Even by settlers themselves? And does anyone who seeks to explain this behavior believe that this hate is in the minority in this movement?

And how can any American Jew, even the most extreme, justify giving a dime to support such people. Doing so is a hillul hashem, a desecration of God’s name.  Further, how can the U.S. government allow such donations to be tax-deductible?  Not in my name.  That’s what I say.  Barack Obama: this is what your and my taxpayer dollars indirectly subsidize.  Stop this now!  Repeal the non-profit status of all U.S. funders supporting settler groups.

*   *

The account below describes how easy it is to kill Palestinian children and cover up the crime:

A female Border Guard officer in Jenin spoke of an incident in which a nine-year-old Palestinian, who tried to climb the fence, failed, and fled – was shot to death: “They fired… when he was already in the territories and posed no danger. The hit was in the abdomen area, they claimed he was on a bicycle and so they were unable to hit him in the legs.”

But the soldier was most bewildered by what happened next between the four soldiers present: “They immediately got their stories straight… An investigation was carried out, at first they said it was an unjustified killing… In the end they claimed that he was checking out escape routes for terrorists or something… and they closed the case.”

*   *

I find the following story especially intriguing because it details the complexity of the gender relationships at work for a female soldier goaded into abusing Palestinian victims by a male superior officer.  She deals with her own vulnerability as a minority female in a male bastion, the IDF, by out-doing her male counterparts for violence.  The fact that she’s abusing a Palestinian man, for whom such degradation at the hands of a woman is an especial cultural badge of shame, adds to the strangeness of the entire incident:

‘They don’t know how to accept the women’

The female soldiers repeatedly mention the particular difficulties they had as women, who had to prove that to were “fighters” in the midst of the goading male soldiers on the one hand, and the Palestinians, who have a hard time handling women in uniform on the other hand. The following story of a female Border Guard officer sums the matter up.

When the interviewer asked her if the Palestinians “suffer even more from the women in the Border Guard”, she said: “Yes. Yes. Because they don’t know how to accept the women. The moment a girl slaps a man, he is so humiliated, he is so humiliated he doesn’t know what to do with himself… I am a strong and well-built girl, and this is even harder for them to handle. So one of their ways of coping is to laugh. They really just started to laugh at me. The commander looks at me and tells me, ‘What? Are you going to let that slide? Look how he’s laughing at you’.

“And you, as someone who has to salvage your self-respect… I told them to sit down and I told him to come…I told him to come close, I really approached him, as if I was about to kiss him. I told him, ‘Come, come, what are you afraid of? Come to me!’ And I hit him in the balls. I told him, ‘Why aren’t you laughing?’ He was in shock, and then he realized that… not to laugh. It shouldn’t reach such a situation.”

You hit him with your knee?

“I hit him in the balls. I took my foot, with my military show, and hit him in the balls. I don’t know if you’ve ever been hit in the balls, but it looks like it hurts. He stopped laughing in my face because it hurt him. We then took him to a police station and I said to myself, ‘Wow, I’m really going to get in trouble now.’ He could complain about me and I could receive a complaint at the Military police’s criminal investigation division.

“He didn’t say a word…I was afraid about myself, not about him. But he didn’t say a word. ‘What should I say, that a girl hit me?’ And he could have said, but thank God, three years later I didn’t get anything and no one knows about it.”

What did it feel like that moment?

“Power, strength that I should not have achieved this way. But I didn’t brag about it. That’s why I did it that way, one on one. I told them to sit on the side, I saw that he wasn’t looking. I said to myself that it doesn’t make sense that as a girl who gives above and beyond and is worth more than some boys – they should laugh at me like that because I am a girl. Because you think I can’t do it…”

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Dershowitz Accuses Me of Publishing at Neo-Nazi Site

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

This post should be subtitled, My Smear With Alan a la My Dinner With Andre.

Many of you know I wrote a critique of  Israel’s hasbara-infused emergency relief efforts in Haiti, The Zionization of Disaster Relief.  Israel’s medical team left  11 days after they arrived, roughly at the same time the world’s TV cameras shut off their lights and went home.  The post drew a lot of attention here and elsewhere.  I was surprised a few days ago to start seeing visits to my blog from a Huffington Post blog post by Alan Dershowitz attacking those who criticized Israel’s relief effort in Haiti.  I searched diligently for a link back to my blog post but couldn’t find any.

Since I have a deep aversion to Der Dersh’s vicious rhetorical style, lies and distortions I never read what he wrote.  But a reader has now done me the favor and notes that Dershowitz has done something rather extraordinary.  He’s named and quoted my blog post and claimed it was published at a neo-Nazi website.  I kid you not.  The ballsy nerve of this guy is astounding!

The neo-Nazi website ReportersNotebook.com features a blog entitled “The Zionization of Disaster Relief.” It accuses Israel of “exploiting the suffering of poor, defenseless Haitians on behalf of Israeli Triumphalism.” It complains that Israel is rendering medical aid to Haiti only to deflect attention from its crimes against the Palestinians.

Anyone reading this will come away with the impression that I wrote a blog post for a neo-Nazi website.  Now, lest you think this was an accident: my blog post was REPUBLISHED at this site without my knowledge or permission.  The site credited me by name as author of the post and linked to the original blog post at this site.

I have a long history of critiquing Dershowitz’s garbage here so his “mistake” or whatever he’ll call it is nothing of the sort.  He’s really a sly fellow.  He doesn’t go so far as to name me as author, he merely quotes from my post and mentions the neo-Nazi connection.  This allows him and all the other pro-Israel hasbarist scoundrels to shrey about my work being loved by neo-Nazis. If someone was dull enough they might even think that I published the work at that site.

This is a common tactic by idiot wind pro-Israel bloggers and pamphleteers like David Horowitz at Frontpagemagazine and Joseph Weissman at Seismic Shock, among others.  The less degrees of separation they can find between you and Hitler supposedly defames and diminishes you.  In reality, a reasonable person understands that in the internet age anyone can quote or republish anything and there’s little you can do about it.  But it gives them a chance to infer that you hang out with neo-Nazis, ergo…

Needless to say, I jotted off a firm note to HuffPo’s editors insisting that they correct the misattribution.  One of them replied that they “will address it.”  So far so good.  But I await a full resolution of the matter.

UK Christian Zionists: Hitler ‘Hearts’ Sizer

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

CORRECTION: Joseph Weissman and his right-wing blogger choir note that I made an error in this post.  In his deceased Blogspot blog, he links to the post below under the heading “Bastions of Truth,” which I mistakenly thought was also written by him.  Apparently, this blog is independent of Weissman and yet another part of the vast UK Christian Zionist right wing pro-Israel blog conspiracy targeting Sizer and other insufficiently supportive clerics.  Please note my error of attribution as you read below.

But given that Weissman links to the post under that heading, one would presume that he endorses the sentiments.  If you don’t, Joe, tell us why you linked to it?

*   *

Thanks to reader Robin, I’ve just been noodling around at Joseph Weissman’s (aka Mordechai Ben Emet, Yeze Yezekiel) old blog, Christian Attitudes To Jews, Israel, and Zionism (which must’ve predated the Blogspot blog the police asked him to remove), where he first began cyberstalking and bullying Rev. Stephen Sizer. Unfortunately, I can’t find the latter blog in Google cache or the Wayback Machine.

Here’s a delightful nugget titled so appropriately, Rev. Stephen Sizer’s Goose-Stepping Admirers:

If Hitler had a blog, who would be included in his list of links? Alright, use your imagination. Imagine that people write blogs in hell – the hell bit being that nobody ever reads them. I suspect that this fellow might be included among Hitler’s links: Anglican vicar and Supercessionist , Revd Stephen Sizer.

And here are some other choice steaming bits of hyperventilation served up by Mr. Weissman:

Stephen Sizer’s hatred for the Jewish State has been vomited forth in the form of many books and articles.

[Neo-Nazis] feel he articulates their feelings about one particular group of people in a way they can normally only express by grunting noises, beating people up, smashing headstones and painting swastikas on synagogues.

Look, I’m not saying this guy doesn’t have a right to be an infantile jerk if he wants to and spout such utter nonsense.  But think of who’s taken up his cause: the Jewish Chronicle, the BBC, the Guardian (ferchrissakes!), Melanie Phillips, Harry’s Place, Engage.  So OK, let them explain this fellow whom they’re trying to make a poster boy for free speech.  Does Joseph Weissman have the right to such lunacy?  Sure.  But who wants to turn him into a hero for this garbage?  I always say in situations like this: if you lay down with a dog, you’ll get up with fleas.  Did any of the serious journalists who’ve taken up Weissman’s cause do the least research on what this guy really stands for and has written?  Am I the first?  I simply find it hard to believe that people have been snookered by this guy.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

FAIR Questions Bronner’s Objectivity

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

The progressive media watchdog group, FAIR, has published a statement joining Electronic Intifada and Tikun Olam in questioning the stonewalling approach the NY Times has taken to the issue of whether Ethan Bronner’s son’s induction into the IDF raises questions about his objectivity and conflict of interest:

What the Times needs to ask itself is whether it expects that its bureau chief has the normal human feelings about matters of life or death concerning one’s child.

Might he feel hostility, for example, when interviewing members of organizations who were trying to kill his son? When the IDF goes into battle, might he be rooting for the side for which his son is risking his life? Certainly such issues would be taken very seriously if a Times reporter had a child who belonged to a military force that was engaged in hostilities with the IDF; indeed, there’s little doubt that a reporter in that position would not be allowed to continue to cover the Mideast conflict.

Having a conflict of interest, it should be stressed, is not the same thing as producing slanted journalism; rather, it means that a journalist has outside motivations that are strongly at odds with his or her journalistic responsibilities. That a journalist has been “scrupulously fair” in the past does not excuse an ongoing conflict of interest; journalists should not be placed in a position where they have to ignore the well-being of their family in order to do their job, nor should readers be expected to trust that they can do so.

FAIR goes on to note that Bronner’s reporting has certainly not been known to be “scrupulously fair” in the past, which strengthens the level of concern among progressive readers of the Times.  I wrote here that Bronner’s last report on a new IDF offensive against the Goldstone Report claims that “virtually all Israelis” and even human rights NGOs agree there was no wholesale attack on civilian infrastructure in Gaza as Goldstone claims.  This is a patently false statement and has no right being in a newspaper claiming to represent a neutral perspective on this issue.

Please take FAIR’s advice and write or call Clark Hoyt, the Times’ public editor.  If he covers this at all publicly, he’ll doubtless side with Bronner and his editors, but it’s still worth trying to keep ‘em honest:

CONTACT:
New York Times
Clark Hoyt, Public Editor
[email protected]
Phone: 212-556-7652

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

English Cyberbully, Weissman, Has Multiple Blogger Personality Disorder

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

Yesterday, I wrote about the strange case of Joseph Weissman, who writes the Seismic Shock blog, whose virtually sole purpose seems to be to politically cyberstalk Anglican vicar, Stephen Sizer, for his allegedly anti-Semitic, pro-Iranian, anti-Israel views.  Wiseman developed almost a personal vendetta against Sizer, infiltrating his parish’s Facebook profile to send personal messages to members denouncing him and sending letters to groups sponsoring Sizer’s lectures demanding that they cancel his appearances.

Understandably, the cleric becamse annoyed and frustrated by this anonymous attack (Weissman took the identity of Mordechai Ben Emet as his pseudonym).  After discovering Weissman was using Leeds University computer facilities for his online escapades, Sizer complained to authorities.  He also complained to the local police who visited Weissman.  According to Weissman, the police asked him to take down one of his blogs and he reluctantly did so.

That’s when all hell broke loose among the idiot wind British blogging right.  Charges of violation of free speech, rampaging police state, “the knock at the door” phenomenon, etc. flew across the internet reaching as far as Melanie Phillips in the Spectator.  He’s become the right-wing poster boy and cause celebre of the moment (lasting about 5 minutes in media time).

Turns out thought that good master Weissman is even more strange and complicated than I gave him credit for.  Turns out that besides the two blogs he used to attack Sizer he has at least one other along with an entirely different fictional identity.  What’s more, he outed himself today in a rather feeble attempt to diminish the sting of my post attacking him yesterday.

Several months ago, someone calling himself Yeze Yezekiel, approached me with information that an Israeli settler group, Honenu, was lobbying for amnesty for settler murderers like Yigal Amir and providing legal representation to settler terrorists like Jack Teitel.  I get these kinds of messages regularly and this one was quite useful and interesting.  I followed up with research of my own and wrote a post in which I linked to this fellow’s blog, The Rosh Pina Project.

Turns out I should’ve smelled a rat when Yeze told me that he’d published about Honenu at Harry’s Place, a vociferously pro-Israel blog which takes a shine to exposes of alleged anti-Semites and anti-Israelists like yours truly, who’s been pilloried there.  I should’ve asked myself, what is this guy doing publishing there?  I considered the matter and decided he sounded like he was trustworthy enough despite his unsavory affiliation.

Now, what I’d like to know is why Harry’s Place allows contributors to blog using multiple identities.  There’s just something weird about that unless the owner of that blog himself was fooled.  I somehow doubt this, since Weissman has published multiple times there under his Seismic Shock identity.  The idea that HP wouldn’t have known Yeze’s real identity seems far-fetched.

Another catch for me was that Yeze allowed me to believe he was a Messianic Jew who was compelled to act by Jack Teitel’s bombing of the apartment of an Israeli Messianic Jew, which wounded the man’s teenage child.  Here is what his blog says about its religious affiliation:

The Rosh Pina Project is an online meeting place for Messianic Jews and all those who believe that Messianic Jews deserve fair treatment in Israel and the Diaspora, and protection as a religious minority in Israel. Yeze and Gever, both affiliated with Messianic Jewish fellowships, are currently the main contributors to this site. The Rosh Pina Project will be highlighting the persecution of Messianic Jews in Israel, unfair treatment of Messianic Jews in the mainstream media, and post cultural and political reviews.

I replied to Yeze that I had absolutely no interest in Messianic Judaism, but that he sounded like a reasonable person and as long as he kept his religious beliefs out of any interaction we might have I didn’t see any problem.

That was the end of it till Yeze outed himself today and revealed that he is none other than Joseph Weissman himself.  At this point, I’m really scratching my head and wondering what’s going on with this person.  Who is he?  Which is his real identity?  Is he Joseph Weissman, a Jew?  Is that his current name, birth name?  Is he a Messianic Jew?  Is he something else altogether that no one besides him knows?  What are his motives for doing this?  What is wrong with this person?

Clearly he craves the notoriety, as his blog is now littered with links to all the other blogs and newspapers that have featured his little imbroglio.  There’s more than a little of the youthful, confused, passionate college student testing of identities and modes of discourse here.  But there comes a time when this wears thin and it has.

Everyone who considers writing about this person from any sort of sympathetic angle–beware!  We don’t know who he is or what he stands for.  We don’t know how many identities he might have.  We don’t know his motives or his real beliefs or agenda are.  You owe it to yourself to do a lot of due diligence before you attempt to write anything definitive about this fellow.  If not, you could end up with a lot of egg on your face.  Buyer beware!

I want to add an addendum here: I do not know Stephen Sizer.  I do not necessarily agree with every position he may take regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.  To me, that is not the point.  The point is that Joseph Weissman does not have the right to engage in acts that may be illegal against anyone including Stephen Sizer.  And Joseph Wiseman does not have the right to exploit and manipulate the blogging world for whatever strange personal agenda he may have.

UPDATE: Weissman also outs himself here revealing that he was born a Jew, but is now a Messianic Jew and Christian, and comes from a family which for three generations has accepted Jesus Christ.  No wonder he has a case of multiple blogging personalities/identities.  Now that we’ve cleared all that up I think the man is perfectly transparent!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE