Just when you think things can’t possibly get any weirder. Not to mention, when you thought you put to bed one of the stranger Senate election campaigns in recent memory…The Washington Post reports (if you are denied access by a firewall, try this link) that during the Roy Moore Senate campaign, Breitbart News was an accessory to an attempt to bribe an Alabama lawyer representing one of Moore’s female victims. Leigh Corfman was one of the first women to come forward to recount her experiences at Moore’s hands when she was a teenage girl. She told her story to the Washington Post, which broke the original story with several women who came forward to report Moore’s abusive behavior. Corfman, who knew the attorney, Eddie Sexton, hired him to handle the media inquiries expected after her she went public.
After agreeing to take her on as a client, Sexton was approached by two local businessmen who owned a construction company. The two partners played an instrumental role in the Moore campaign and accompanied the candidate to many of his appearances. One of the businessmen had previously hired Sexton to represent him during bankruptcy proceedings and a lawsuit. The former approached the attorney and asked to meet him.
Sexton didn’t know what the subject of the meeting would be. When he arrived, he expected to see the two individuals he knew. Instead, he found them in the room along with two individuals he didn’t know. They turned out to be two journalists working for Breitbart News. One of them was Aaron Klein, Breitbart’s Jerusalem bureau chief. Klein has reported for various legitimate, semi-legitimate and illegitimate publications including the NY Daily News, the far-right crackpot site, Word News Daily (WND), and Time Magazine. His Israel-related reporting consists of lurid, heavily embellished reports of Islamist terrorism targeting Israel.
Media Matters wrote this about Klein’s work:
Klein is utterly devoid of credibility — he’s a conspiracy theorist who claims President Obama has an “eligibility problem,” says Obama may be a Muslim who “might be with” Al-Qaeda given his “Islamic background,” and previously authored books about Obama being a “Manchurian President” deserving of impeachment.
I’ve written several posts referencing Klein’s journalistic misadventures here for anyone wanting more.
It’s no surprise that when Steve Bannon announced his ambitious expansion involving opening “bureaus” in several international cities, Jerusalem was one of them. As the media outlet which specialized in trumpeting the threat Islam posed to western civilization, Jerusalem was naturally on the front lines of this crusade. And who better to lead the charge than Klein, whose reporting focused on just such yellow Islamophobic journalism. But what was Klein doing in Alabama? I’ve tweeted asking him some of these questions. Unsurprisingly, he hasn’t replied.
When Sexton arrived at the meeting, he was shown a handwritten statement which the participants asked him to sign. It said that he had dropped Corfman as a client and no longer believed she was a credible source regarding the accusations. Sexton left the meeting with the statement in his pocket and without agreeing to sign it. Over the next few weeks, the local business partners barraged him with requests and reminders to sign the statement, which he refused to do. His main reason for doing so involved the danger it would pose to his law license. Lawyers are supposed to represent their client’s best interest. Dropping one and then bad mouthing her to the media posed a potential ethical violation that might endanger Sexton’s ability to practice law. Unfortunately, his loyalty to his client didn’t appear to play a major direct role in his decision.
Breitbart, which subsequent to the campaign, fired Bannon, released a response to the Post which stretches credulity:
A spokeswoman for Breitbart said the two reporters were not aware of any offer to pay Sexton or provide him with legal work and did not know who penned a handwritten statement he says he was asked to sign.
It beggars belief that two reporters sent to secure a major scoop and save Roy Moore’s skin would believe that Sexton was going to jeopardize his career for nothing. The local Moore supporters certainly knew that a bribe was being offered:
During a 20-minute interview at a construction site in Birmingham, Davi parried questions about money, saying his partner would know details of what was offered to Sexton. “That was between Eddie and Gary,” Davi said. Asked where the money would have come from, he said, “Probably Gary.”
Sexton also recorded a call with one of the men discussing the Breitbart reporters, who were surprise guests at the meeting, and the bribe:
“That’s the first time I met them today, and we just been talking with Bannon and then with Roy Moore and then with Rand Paul. We never met those guys until today,” Lantrip said in the recorded call, a copy of which was obtained by The Post. (A spokesman for Rand Paul said the senator does not know Davi or Lantrip and had no involvement in seeking the statement.)
“I mean, have y’all — have they already paid y’all money?” Sexton asked.
“No, just what I’m about to give you,” Lantrip replied.
We got the 10,” Lantrip said, pausing briefly, “dollars. We got that, but it, it don’t matter.”
It seems highly unlikely that two key figures in the Moore campaign, which was strongly endorsed by Steve Bannon and Breitbart News, would invent contacts with both Moore and Bannon. That casts doubt on the Breitbart denial. These journalists were in Alabama to cover the Moore campaign and crown him Steve Bannon’s made-senator after his victory. When the campaign was beset by rumors of Moore’s indiscretions, Breitbart swung into action. This was no longer journalism. This had become a hybrid between being an election “fixer” and a journalistic huckster. It might be territory familiar to Citizen Kane’s hero, Charles Foster Kane. But not to much of contemporary American journalism.
It also seems suspicious that a businessman would offer to pay a $10,000 bribe out of his own pocket, unless he’d been promised his “investment” would be profitable to him in the future. The only way for that to happen is if Moore or Bannon greased his palm in return. My guess is that the original source of the funds would be either one of them, but more likely Bannon. Or that they promised them ‘in-kind’ returns on his investment in the form of construction contracts, etc.
It seems preposterous that Sexton reported the bribe offer to the U.S. attorney in Birmingham, whose response was: ““We don’t find any applicable criminal provision in federal election law.” A lawyer is offered a bribe in order to save a U.S. Senate election campaign and the Justice Department doesn’t believe this would violate federal law? One wonders what it would take for the U.S. attorney to find there was such a violation? Perhaps a videotape of money changing hands? Or maybe even that wouldn’t be enough. I suspect that given the national attention devoted to this campaign, the feds wanted to avoid Sexton and his charges like a ten foot pole. If they announced an investigation it would further erode Moore’s campaign. As Republican appointees, that would not look good in Washington.
Whatever the reasons for inaction, the decision not to pursue the matter is reprehensible, though entirely understandable given how riven the Trump administration is by charges of malfeasance and corruption.
The Washington Post investigation into the bribe is intriguing, but this seedy incident has absolutely nothing to do with the State of Israel. Right?
@ Doctor John: Nothing to do with Israel except that Aaron Klein has made a living off creepy, disgusting Islamophobia in the pages of the Murdoch tabloids like the Daily News. Islamophobia mirrored in Israeli Jewish politics & society. And that he’s made his home in Israel, where his hate is only reinforced. So no, it has nothing to do with Israel except all these matters.
Israeli Jews may hate or mistrust Arabs, but that doesn’t necessarily translate into ‘Islamophobia’, which seems to be a Western construct.
I recall watching an Arab labourer laying down his prayer rug and praying in front of the entrance to a busy Israeli mall. Dozens of Israeli Jews walked past the Arab and none gave him so much as a glance.
Now imagine the reaction if a Muslim started to kneel and pray in front of an American mall.
Recall that, Jewish scholars were among the first who attempted to present Islam to Europeans and to stress, and sometimes to romanticize, the merits and achievements of Muslim civilization in its great days.
According to Bernard Lewis, “Jewish scholars brought up in the Jewish religion and trained in the Hebrew language found Islam and Arabic far easier to understand than did their Christian colleagues…”
“Jewish scholars like Gustav Weil, Ignaz Goldziher, and others played a key role in the development of an objective, nonpolemical, and positive evaluation of Islamic civilization.”
Had any of the founders of Zionism or the State of Israel made disparaging remarks against Islam?
I don’t believe they did.
@ Doctor John:
Nonsense, I don’t care whether you call it “Arabophobia” or “Islamophobia.” It is racist and it is typically Israeli. Claiming this is a “western construct” is bullshit. Especially since Israelis are oh so eager to consider themselves “western,” as opposed to the backward “east” represented by Arabs.
I do so love the anecdotes hasbaroids offer here which they use to claim universal Israeli values, which don’t exist.
You and I both know that extremely few Muslims pray in front of Israeli malls. They pray largely in mosques, the same places American Muslims pray. But we do have a similar problem your Israeli pals have who desecrate mosques, burn them, the holy books and desecrate graves. Not to mention Israeli developers who destroy sacred Muslim graveyards. We have our Islamophobes as well who do similar things. Birds of a feather…
Why is it that you idiots always bring up Bernard Lewis as if he was God’s gift to the west in his propagation of an Orientalist version of Islam. He offers a Reader’s Digest version of Islam. Stop quoting him. It only makes you look foolish.
Why do you make a false distinction between Islam and Arabness. You know virtually all the founders of Zionism hated Arabs and saw them as competitors and enemies.
I don’t have the patience to debate you any further. You are done in this thread. Move on.
You published four comments in only a few hours time. The next time you do this I will delete any more than three comments in any 24 hour period. Or I may just ban you outright since you’ve received multiple warnings already.
“I recall watching an Arab labourer laying down his prayer rug and praying in front of the entrance to a busy Israeli mall. Dozens of Israeli Jews walked past the Arab and none gave him so much as a glance.”
Well duh: You go to their country, so you cannot really be surprised at the local customs. That would be a bit rich!
Islam and Judaism are close. Much closer than either is with Christianity. The antagonism started with the violent creation of modern Israel.
@Richard
According to an interview Klein had with the Philadelphia Inquirer, Klein is not a citizen of Israel.
So, what gives?
http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/291149646.html
@ Dr. John: He lives in Israel and his hate is amplified by similar patterns of hate throughout Israel. Not to mention that his employer is not only Islamophobic and corrupt, but supports the hell out of Israel. You don’t have to be a citizen of Israel to mirror the hatreds prevalent in Israeli Jewish society.
Richard, here you have really hurt your own credibility. A screaming headline “Israeli-American”, when Klein is no more Israeli than is the NY Times or Al Jazeera bureau reporter living in Israel. You use it as a slur, just admit it, to refer to right wing Zionist Jews, that cabal of evil corrupt and powerful people who control everything. Look how low those Zionists, orchestrated by the Zionist regime, will sink…
But come to think of it, this whole blog, and the comments, is about trolling, isn’t it?
Throw out provocative and misleading stories, then watch the nasty comments roll in from all sides
Lots of fun, isn’t it??
But not very educational.
@ Yehuda:
Says who? You? And who made you my judge & jury? If I need someone to judge my credibility I won’t be turning to you.
Not true. He has been living in Israel for years, if not decades. His views are Israeli. His ideology and prejudices are Israeli. He writes from and about Israel.
I’ve never used “Israeli” as a slur. But I did in the article associate him with Israeli ideology and political views I find objectionable. That’s not a slur. That’s a fact.
You are already moderated. Because this statement is grossly insulting, a lie, & a major comment rule violation, you are now banned.
I am a Zionist, you moron.
Rather, I think you’re the troll.
Don’t let the door hit you on the way out…
‘@Richard
According to an interview Klein had with the Philadelphia Inquirer, Klein is not a citizen of Israel.
So, what gives?’
Okay, this is a low blow, but…
I’m reminded that Hitler’s claim to German citizenship was problematical. It all required some legalistic games around 1932.