Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for November, 2011

Israeli Intelligence All But Takes Credit for Isfahan Blast, Black Ops as Route to War

Tuesday, November 29th, 2011

Sheera Frenkel, reporting in the Times of London has gotten several high-level Israeli intelligence officials to go on record confirming yesterday’s explosion at Isfahan’s uranium enrichment facility was sabotage, and not an accident as Iran initially reported (later it withdrew this claim and said no accident had occurred at all). Iran’s outright denial that any accident occurred is reminiscent of Hezbollah’s denial that it’s arms cache in south Lebanon exploded recently, despite the fact that local villagers, the Daily Star, and an Israeli source here in this blog reported the sabotage.

Among the more colorful and typically Israeli macho statements was by Maj. Gen. Giora Eiland who said coyly that he didn’t know if the Mossad did it, and that it could very well be “the hand of God:”

 ”There aren’t many coincidences, and when there are so many events there is probably some sort of guiding hand, though perhaps it’s the hand of God,” he said.

How many nations in today’s world do you know whose citizens would refer, even obliquely, to their spy agency unironically as the hand of God??

The tragedy of this black ops program is that it will not rattle or deter Iran, as Israeli intelligence believes. It will have the opposite effect. It will make them redouble their efforts. It will make them less, rather than more willing to compromise in any meaningful way with western efforts to rein in their nuclear program. And once Iran has a nuclear weapon it will make it more, rather than less likely it will use such weapons as North Korea does–as a cudgel over the heads of their enemies.

One false argument neocon hawks and the Obama administration make is that a nuclear Iran will use WMD to force hegemony on its neighbors.  The truth is that the only thing that will do that is driving Iran to the wall, attacking it, and trying to wipe out its nuclear program.  If you turn Iran into a martyr regime, it will become our worst nightmare.  This is what makes Israeli and U.S. policy a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Contrary to what Israeli generals believe, the Iranians are not pushovers, they can’t be intimidated.  They’re willing to die for their country even more than Israelis.  They’ve fought defensive wars going back decades and lost millions in conflict.  A few explosions, assassinations, and computer viruses will not spook them.  In fact, I believe Iran would be far more willing to absorb casualties in any ongoing conflict than the Israeli public would.  That’s why I think alas, Israel’s policy is one devised by fools.

I’ve come to the reluctant conclusion that Israel knows that black ops will turn Iran more intransigent.  It welcomes such Iranian rigidity because it means the day is closer when it will be set loose on the Iranians. Israel’s policy toward Iran is scorched earth. It has decided the Ayatollahs are willing to die for their nukes and Israel wants to make their dreams come true. But it wants the world to go along, at least tacitly, which is the only reason it hasn’t attacked already.

Israel, like Dick Cheney circa 2003, has a complex agenda that involves reinforcing Israeli hegemony over its regional interests.  In truth, Iranian nukes are not an existential threat to Israel.  Rather, the true existential threat (as viewed by the Bibites) is Palestinian sovereignty.  Spooking the world with the specter of Iranian nukes is a convenient diversion from the far more important and intractable problem of Israel-Palestine.  There would be nothing like a little regional war to take Israel’s and the world’s mind off the rights of the Palestinian people.  It should be good for at least a two year respite I should say.  Meanwhile, teaching the Iranians a lesson would go a long way toward intimidating any other regional powers like Turkey, Syria or Egypt who give any thoughts toward competing with Israeli interests.

Further, Israeli wars go a long way to puncturing any social justice movements seeking to point to economic and political inequities inside the country.  No Israeli activist or political party with a reform agenda can make any headway against a far right government pursuing a war policy.  Just as they will in Iran, the common folk will rally round the flag and the nation under threat.  All other competing tensions or interests will be thrown aside in a bid for national unity.  This is yet another tragedy of war (cf. 1982, 2006, 2009, 201?).

Returning to Iran, contrary to the war hawk view of its policymakers as intent on mystical national suicide, probably understands Israel’s intent.  This may be why Iran has reacted in a tightly controlled manner to the attacks.  It understands that much is at stake and that it is being goaded into overreacting so the west can use this as a pretext to strike.

Annals of Israeli Blacks Ops: Lebanon, Iran Continued

Monday, November 28th, 2011

Lots of explosions big and small today in different parts of the region.  In Isfahan, there was a major blast at a facility that stores uranium gas which centrifuges use in the enrichment process for Iran’s nuclear program.  Damage to this plant could cause heavy delays in its ability to further refine the nuclear fuel necessary to produce a nuclear weapon (if it is producing one).

Unlike in past similar instances, my Israeli sources could not confirm Mossad involvement in today’s mishap (which doesn’t mean there wasn’t, it only means he didn’t receive any information about it).  But the explosion sounds exceedingly similar to past such events at Iranian bases (it would be the third such one in the past year).

Iran missile base explosion

Nov. 12th Iran missile base blast damage

Ronen Bergman, writing about today’s Isfahan incident and the recent missile base explosion, added extensive detail about how Mossad might’ve caused such sabotage in the latter case:

The Iranians believe the hand of the Mossad was involved with the help of Iranian opposition forces [the MEK].  The Iranians believe the target was not the actual facility but Gen. Hassan Moghaddam, who supervised IRG missile research and development.  In their evaluation, the operation succeeded beyond what the Mossad had anticipated.  This occurred because the attackers used an enormous quantity of explosive material in order to destroy the entire office building in which Moghaddam was located.  This caused damage to the fuel tanks and other explosives located there which caused an even greater explosion.

Lots of odd bits to parse here.  First, I don’t find it credible that Ronen Bergman knows what the Iranians believe about any of this, unless the Mossad is telling him what they’re hearing from official Iranian sources via covert surveillance.  Rather, I believe the above is what the Mossad itself is likely to have told him happened.  Of course, Bergman can’t expose his source so he couches the passage in terms related to what Iranians believe, rather than what Israeli intelligence believes.

Second, as to the claim that the MEK managed to infiltrate the complex with a massive amount of explosive material, it simply beggars belief.  How could they have penetrated one of the most closely guarded facilities in the Iranian military?  I suppose the MEK could’ve rigged a vehicle in the manner of a car bomb and brought it into the base and exploded it next to the office building in question.  If so, what an amazing lapse on the part of the IRG!  At any rate, we either have a massive security breach exploited by the Mossad and MEK or we have a story that raises more questions than it answers.

The Institute for Science and International Security proposes a different scenario, which may be equally plausible:

ISIS learned that the blast occurred as Iran had achieved a major milestone in the development of a new missile.  Iran was apparently performing a volatile procedure involving a missile engine at the site when the blast occurred.

This would tend to imply that the explosion was an accident resulting from a highly dangerous procedure involved in development of a new Iranian missile prototype.  Though it might still be possible to sabotage such a missile engine test.

Returning to Bergman, he doesn’t say that the Mossad was responsible for the Isfahan explosion (as he does for the blast that killed Moghaddam two weeks ago), but he implies that it was.

Moving to Lebanon, yesterday Lebanese militants fired at least four rockets into northern Israel.  Haaretz says the IDF doesn’t believe Hezbollah was responsible but that a Palestinian-affiliated “global jihad” splinter group was responsible.  This description is so vague as to be almost meaningless.  But this is par for the course for Israeli intelligence and I don’t necessarily believe anything they say about who’s responsible.

This was the first such fire in a very long while.  There must’ve been a significant motivation for the group to have violated the ceasefire in place since the 2006 war.  I can think of only two possible reasons: one, the militants may be flexing their muscle, perhaps at the behest of Iran as a warning to Israel of what it has in store if it attacks Iran; two, my report last week that IDF military intelligence tricked Hezbollah into taking a booby-trapped Israeli drone into a south Lebanon arms depot of theirs, where the Israelis promptly detonated it setting off an explosion reported by the Daily Star.

If this is indeed something like what did happen, Hezbollah would be exceedingly pissed off and a response of firing a volley or two of missiles into northern Israel wouldn’t be at all surprising.  And in response to that, if the IDF wished to soothe relations with the group it could release a statement that its own aerial surveillance found no evidence of any explosion at any Hezbollah arms depot in the south.  This would in effect be telling the Lebanese militia that Israel didn’t cause any explosion.  And this indeed is what happened with Alon Ben David at Channel 10 (Hebrew) and Jerusalem Post reporting that IDF drones could find no evidence of any damage to the Hezbollah base in question.  Of course, Ben David makes an allowance for the fact that the drone may not have examined the correct location of the explosion and only photographed where the IDF THOUGHT it occurred.

Though a few troubling thoughts about this story remain: if there was no explosion, then Israel and Hezbollah would know this and there would be no need to fire missiles or deny that there was an explosion.  If there was an explosion, then Hezbollah would know this and an Israeli denial would ring hollow.

I really don’t know what to make of it all.  But one thing is for sure, my well-connected source was told by likely Israeli intelligence operatives that Israel caused this explosion.  Then a few days later after Lebanese militants rained down missiles on Israel, other intelligence sources told Israeli media a different story.  It’s a strange, dark and dangerous world Israelis have made for themselves.

Exclusive: Peace Now Price Tag Suspect, Parents Identified

Sunday, November 27th, 2011

Today, Israeli police released the suspect in the price tag attacks on Jerusalem’s Peace Now office to house arrest. As soon as he got home, he fired up his computer and began sending e mail blast death threats to every Peace Now activist he knew.  What’s even more astonishing is that he sent these emails in his own name using his personal e mail address, which allowed every recipient to identify him.  This despite the fact that his father, who works for the Shin Bet, managed to get a gag order restricing publication of his name.  More on Mom and Dad below.

Though I’ve been desperately seeking to expose this person’s identity for weeks to no avail (the court placed under gag any information about the suspect in order to protect his father, a Shin Bet officer), once he reoffended it seems everyone who knew his name lost patience and a number of victims exposed him. He is Dor Oved, age 18, whose mother is a policewoman. The family lives in Mevasseret Tzion.

Here is the email threat he sent to a Peace Now activist with my translation appended:

From: : דור עובד <[email protected]>
Date: 27 נובמבר 2011 15:45:59 GMT+02:00
To:
Subject: א ז”ל

אני יהרוג אותך הסוף קרב

“Subject: E. RIP

I will kill you the end is near”

Dor oved facebook profile

Is this Dor Oved pointing a gun at the camera, our culprit?

UPDATE: With the help of some good old-fashioned Israeli gum-shoeing, a source has helped me identify the parents names as well.  They are Shachar and Aliza Oved.  As I mentioned above, he works as a mid-level Shin Bet official and she as a police officer.  It is illegal to identify by name an Israeli intelligence agent inside Israel.  Thank God we follow different laws here.  Because Shachar Oved threatened the assembled press and photographers in court if they did so, and because his son is a menace to society and democratic values, I think it’s appropriate to identify the parents in this case.  I should mention that my source discovered their names through public documents which I’m not disclosing since they will reveal the family’s home address.

UPDATE I: I’ve been going back and forth regarding online footprints for Oved since there are a number of possible suspects sharing the same name possessing right wing views.  One of my Twitter followers suggested this Dor Oved as a possibility.  The fact that it seems the Facebook profile for this D.O. was removed, plus in the blurry image the guy is pointing a gun at the camera, with a possible IDF tatoo on his arm, and some stridently right-wing material in his Info page, lead me to rank him as our man.  The blurred images of Oved in this Nana video seem to offer a distinct resemblance to this individual, who appears short and stocky.  Another Israeli I consulted notes that in this FB profile says he attended Harel High School in Mevasseret.

A Rotter member has identified another Facebook profile which Dor Oved is explicitly using now (though not in his name).  But it appears to be one he created in the past few hours or day at most.  I believe he deleted the one above because it had his picture and lots of personally identifying information and is now using the one linked in this paragraph.

The family’s defenders say the parents were distraught at his arrest and the acts he confessed to. If so, they did an awfully lousy job of monitoring him on his return home. Not to mention, where did the boy’s hate come from originally? Most children don’t develop their hatreds on their own. They’re usually nurtured in the bosom of family. And with a police-intelligence officer parents there would be plenty of it swirling around that household.

I should warn the police, the suspect and his family that if he reoffends and threatens anyone else I’ll publish his home address and phone number here.  There may be some victims who would like to respond to him in kind.  I have a very firm rule against such personal invasion of privacy.  But in this case, his second round of criminality and invasion of the personal lives and privacy of Peace Now activists more than merits such a possible response. As an Israeli journalist responded to me when I called Oved “an idiot,” saying: “you’re insulting the idiots of the world.”  That about sizes it up right.

I am seeking a photograph of Oved and any further definitive information about him and his parents.

The suspect, who allegedly confessed to the bomb threat attacks while in custody, was naturally rearrested for his new offenses. The only person I feel sorry for here beyond the victims is the defense lawyer who has a fool for a client. But I suppose the dumber one’s client the more trouble he’ll get in, which keeps you fully employed.

Besides this miscreant’s evil deeds. an independent settler activist has stalked Peace Now’s primary settlement researcher, Hagit Ofran, by vandalizing her home and spray painting price tag death threats on her apartment hallway walls.  All of this comes on the heels of one of the gravest legislative onslaughts against Israeli democracy in decades.  Knesset political extremists have enacted legislation criminalizing public references to BDS, passed first reading of a bill that would levy fines up to $500,000 for libel or defamation and remove the need for a plaintiff to prove damages, proposed a bill that would virtually prohibit foreign government support for human rights NGOs, proposed a bill to explicitly declare Israel a Jewish state and presumably penalize those who hold different views.

Not to mention an entirely credible series of reports that Israel has been on the verge of launching a full scale assault on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

All in all, I’d say Israeli democracy is at the lowest ebb I’ve seen in all the years I’ve been following the Israel-Arab conflict (going back to 1967).  Lest anyone make the mistake of believing that Israeli democracy is somehow independent of Israel itself, if Israel’s values of freedom, justice and human rights die, then Israel will be dead in all but name.  It will remain as a corpse into which the far right can breathe its noxious fumes of hate, land theft and racism, thereby creating a new Golem.  We shall call this Golem, this Jewish monster, not Israel, but rather Judea, as in “in blood and fire Judea fell, and in blood and fire it shall arise.”

A final word of thanks to everyone in Israel and other places who contributed to the research that connected all the dots of this story.  Between peace activists in Israel, Twitter and Facebook followers from Israel to Chicago, I could never have put this story together without you.  It’s a tribute to our interconnectedness via social networking sites that this happened.  Consider yourself good citizens of the world, making it a better place, raising hell, comforting the afficted and afflicting the comfortable.

Don’t forget to click on that Paypal button in the sidebar if these stories are important to you.

Danny Ayalon Warns of PA Being Terror Authority, Urges Israel to Cut Off Gaza Water, Power

Sunday, November 27th, 2011

In a move that surely would bring charges of severe violations of international law, Israel’s deputy Führer, er foreign minister, Danny Ayalon, suggested (Hebrew) that if Mahmoud Abbas continues his unity talks with Hamas, that the Palestinian Authority would become the “Terror Authority.”  He also argued that since Hamas, in conducting these talks, was seeking to strengthen the “infrastructure of terror,” Israel may have to severe its own ties to Gaza’s infrastructure, including its water and power.  On top of the siege Israel has imposed since 2006, this would create a humanitarian crisis of immense proportions.  Human beings simply cannot live without water, nor is life much above primitive standards without power.  One would also anticipate it might further reinforce charges that Israel has engaged in war crimes against Gaza during the 2006 war and continues violating international law by imposing immense suffering on the enclave’s 1.5 million inhabitants.

Among Ayalon’s other ‘acute’ observations is that Mahmoud Abbas’ refusal to schedule peace negotiations with Israel at the Quartet’s request marks the PA as the party rejecting peace (he called them “peace refusers”).  He spoke also about relations with Egypt and made the bold–and foolish–claim that peace with Israel would be a national priority no matter which party ruled Egypt.  Apparently, he didn’t hear about the cries during a Muslim Brotherhood rally in an Egyptian mosque last Friday, which weren’t terribly polite (putting it mildly) to Israelis or Jews in general.  But Ayalon did inform us about the unnerving claim, certainly based on compelling evidence which he for some reason couldn’t provide, that Iran’s Ayatollahs are spreading radical Islam inside Egypt and seeking to establish an Islamist regime there.  Given the fierce Sunni-Shiite divide between Egypt and Iran, it’s hard, nay impossible to believe that the Muslim Brotherhood is welcoming Iranian interference in Egypt’s internal affairs.  I tell you, that Ayalon is one smart cookie and so learned in the ways of Islam.  His brilliance never ceases to amaze me.

On a slightly different subject, I just read that in a meeting with Abbas, the Norwegian foreign minister said that Israel’s refusal to transfer $100-million in Palestinian tax payments held by Israel amounted to “waterboarding” Palestine.  A vivid turn of phrase.

 

Amos Schocken: Israel ‘Apartheid Regime,’ ‘Jewish Lobby Addicted’ to Settlement Ideology

Saturday, November 26th, 2011
amos schocken

Haaretz publisher, Amos Schocken

Amos Schocken published an eye-opening, remarkably candid op-ed  (and Hebrew) in Haaretz about the extent of the catastrophe that Israel currently faces, which includes a raft of repressive bills and laws threatening everything from freedom of speech to freedom of the press to academic freedom to minority Arab rights.  We’re used to the agonizing of liberal Zionists who decry the obvious but always seem to stop short of acknowledging just how bad things are, and how radical the solution needs to be.  Schocken, to his credit, faces things I’ve never heard a liberal Zionist face, and calls a spade a spade in his article.  The “Jewish lobby” and even the Supreme Court come in for their share of criticism.

He begins with a 1993 speech by Yitzhak Rabin to the Knesset, in which he warns of the dangers of Iran seeking a nuclear weapon.  But unlike Netanyahu, who uses this possibility to spook the nation into submission to authoritarianism, in much the same way Bush-Cheney did in the aftermath of 9/11, Rabin tells Israel that we must seize on Iran’s pursuit in order to pursue peace:

The possibility that someday Iran might have nuclear weapons must worry us, and is one of the reasons why we must exploit this window of opportunity and progress toward peace.

What a difference a day and a prime minister make, don’t they?  Bibi the manipulator, the exploiter of national insecurity in order to bring a nationalist settler state; Rabin a wise warrior who knew the horrors of war well enough to know that peace was preferable to a nuclear arms race.  But, Schocken continues, Rabin’s way as represented by the Oslo accord was overwhelmed by the settler enterprise, one of whose acolytes assassinated him.

Though liberal Zionists like Gershom Gorenberg and many other Haaretz columnists have decried the settler enterprise for decades, few have been willing to acknowledge the rot it has caused inside Israel.  Few have been willing to go so far as to acknowledge it is likely to destroy nation.  For the conventional liberal Zionist, Israel can be saved by degrees, by small improvements, by nibbling around the edges of injustice.  Schocken seems beyond this.

To his credit, Schocken doesn’t flinch from seeing that mess Israel is in and calling it what it is.  Here are some memorable passages:

According to the Gush Emunim ideology, Israel is for Jews.  Not just the Palestinians of the Territories are irrelevant, but Palestinian citizens of Israel too are subject to the same oppression and denial of their citizenship.  This is a strategy involving seizure of territory and apartheid.

…This ideology sees in the creation of an Israeli apartheid regime something that is necessary to realizing its goals.  It has no problem with using illegal, even criminal acts because its sacred mission is seen as above the law and having no real relation to the laws of Israel.  Rather, it depends on a perverted interpretation of Judaism.

…This ideology has achieved some of its greatest successes in the U.S…Whether this is due to the enormous numbers of Christian evangelicals, or the problematic relationship between Islam and the west, or the Jewish lobby’s addiction to Gush Emunim, the results are clear: it may no longer even be possible for a U.S. president to pursue an activist agenda against Israeli apartheid.

Paragraphs like the last one will make Bill Daroff howl, as well they should.  Because Daroff is not Israel’s friend.  He is the settlers’ friend.  And we, like this wise newspaperman, must make a distinction.  We must tell the world, Jewish and non-Jewish, that there are Jews who have Israel’s long-term interest at heart, and those who will hasten its demise.  The “Jewish lobby” is in the latter category.  Everyone must know this.  We must not allow them to represent us or speak for us.  We must stop StandWithUs and The Israel Project (and sometimes even J Street) and their like to suck the oxygen out of the Israel debate.  We must tell them that they have no monopoly on either power or (self-) righteousness.

Schocken proceeds to link the lawlessness of “Israeli apartheid” to an upsurge in authoritarianism:

It cannot permit opposition or criticism.  It must eliminate the latter and frustrate any effort to restrain its actions…Any actions which are illegal must be made legal by rewriting the law or by reinterpreting existing law so that what was illegal is now redefined as legal.  Similar things happened before in other times and places [a distinct reference to Nazi Germany].

In such a historical context, we see bills against human rights NGOs, against the press and free speech, and an anti-boycott law which seeks to prevent anyone from dealing with Israeli apartheid in the same way the world dealt with South African apartheid.

Even the Israeli Supreme Court, the crown jewel in the apparatus of liberal Zionism comes in for harsh criticism:

It permitted the settler enterprise and essentially served as a partner to it.

But now, Haaretz’s publisher says, the Court has proven an impediment and must be eliminated as an obstacle to the triumph of this authoritarian regime.  Because the Court has refused to permit settlements on privately owned Palestinian land (i.e. land theft), the Court must be ‘packed’ with judges who themselves live on such land and who will recognize that there can be no such concept as privately owned Palestinian land, because this is Jewish land given to this people by divine decree.  Schocken notes the similarity in this theological approach between Gush Emunim and radical Islamists like Hamas (though I believe Hamas has shown far more flexibility in adapting its ideology than settlerism has).

Schocken closes by raising some deeply troubling questions:

Can there be any future for such an Israel?  Even beyond the question of whether Jewish morality and experience permits such a situation, it puts Israel into an inherently unstable, dangerous position.  It puts Israel into the predicament of living with, by, and under the sword.  Whether the sword is a third Intifada, overthrow of the Egyptian peace accord, or an Iranian nuclear weapon.  This Yitzhak Rabin understood [and Bibi does not].

I think we have to begin to use the F-word though the Israeli publisher doesn’t: we are seeing an incipient Israeli fascism.  Perhaps not yet full-blown fascism.  But like a cancer it begins with one cell and spreads to an entire organ and eventually infects the entire organism.  I don’t know whether this illness is terminal.  But it could very well be.  Temporizing no longer works.  Only a radical transformation can.  One that stamps out setttlerism as a viable political force.  One that embraces whole-heartedly democracy over Jewish triumphalism.  Note I did not say “Judaism,” as religion will play an important role in any future role.  But it will never, if Israel is to survive, give members of one religion the right to deprive members of another of their legitimate rights as citizens.

Knesset Bill Would Criminalize Speech

Friday, November 25th, 2011
20111125-210829.jpg

Hebrew summary of provisions of draconian new libel bill which passed first reading in Knesset (Ynet)

Among a raft of new authoritarian bills and legislation proposed or passed by the current Knesset is one that will essentially criminalize speech. Under a proposed new libel law, plaintiffs would no long even have to prove damages to win tens of thousands from defendants. Penalties in some categories will be increased six times and the highest damage award will rise to $500,000.

The bill, which handily passed it’s first reading, would harm all Israeli, but hit bloggers especially hard (Hebrew). I know this from my own personal experience since Rachel Neuwirth did sue me unsuccessfully and Aussie Dave and David Yerushalmi threatened to do so, but never followed through with their threats. There are few NGOs prepared to defend bloggers in such circumstances and how many of us have personal means to do so? A Los Angeles law firm took my case pro bono and spent four years defending me, and the plaintiff is still appealing her loss! If you don’t have a friend who’s a senior partner in a major law firm where do you stand?

There are even fewer such resources for Israeli bloggers. Plus the obstacles in the path of their reporting are even higher than those facing me. They have gag orders and censorship. They have powerful oligarchs with deep pockets and lawyers willing to use the law for the purpose of harassment. They have a draconian security establishment which is a law unto itself. They face a quiescent judicial system designed to favor corporate and state interests at the expense of the individual.

Bloggers in Israel are the canaries in the coal mine of Israeli democracy. The first blogger thrown in prison or bankrupted by such court action under this law will close down a curtain of freedom of the press in the country.

Itzik Sporta of HaOketz said it well when he derided the Knesset for wasting it’s time addressing “problems” that don’t exist rather than ones raised by the social justice movement which cry out for resolution. Israel has the fifth greatest income disparity between rich and poor among OCED nations. One quarter of Israelis live in poverty. Among children, the number is closer to half. There are huge reservoirs of hate and injustice among ethnic groups. Not to mention serious conflicts with its neighbors to be resolved. Instead they’re fixated on helping celebrities, politicians, and oligarchs getting their pound of flesh from the hard working journalists of their country, who labor on behalf of the common person, giving them enough information to make sense out of the mess their country is in.

We might want to start things off after this monstrosity is passed by bringing the first prosecution against the law itself for libeling free speech and press in Israel. One wag quoted in The Marker article says he’s going to exploit the new racist law declaring Israel a Jewish state by suing every Israeli Palestinian who denies it. Then he plans to take the $75,000 he wins from Israeli Palestinian social satitist Sayed Kashua (no doubt a personal friend, I hope) and hire the highest priced psychiatrist he can find to tell the world, he and his country are not insane.

Whether this schandeh of a bill ever passes or not, the damage is done. Merely proposing it has set loose the jackals who circle round Israeli democracy seeking to pick off the weak and vulnerable. First the bloggers, then the journalists, then the NGOs. By the time they come for the average citizen it will already be too late, as Pastor Niemoller so famously wrote. Even Bibi’s own mouthpiece, Yisrael HaYom, warns of the dangers of the law; which is quite ironic since the competition, once it can no longer report anything interesting, will fold and leave the field to Bibiton. The triumph of authoritarianism in Israeli life will only benefit Bibi’s media properties, which will not be challenged under these new measures.

If I were more selfish I’d see this development as a boon to someone like me not subject to Israeli law. After all, when Israel’s democracy dies there only be greater need for blogs like mine. But I’d much rather see Israeli democracy and free speech triumph. Until it does, I will continue doing what I do. And if things turn worse, Israelis who value a free press and who deride secrecy and government impunity may see this blog as their resource and in a way, their insurance policy. I will do whatever I can to protect Israeli sources and bloggers from their work being criminalized. I hope it doesn’t come to Israeli bloggers turning their websites into samizdat, underground knowledge whose sources and web servers must be hidden from the prying eyes of the intelligence agents and wrongdoers who seek to root out the good guys.

Call to Close Ben Gurion University Department for Alleged ‘Leftist’ Bias

Friday, November 25th, 2011

The assault on academic freedom on Israeli campuses continues apace with a slimy report in Yediot Achronot which brays about a review of the department of politics and government at Ben Gurion University.  The committee appointed by the Israeli Council for Higher Education recommended closing the department for its so-called “extreme leftist tendency” if it didn’t mend the errors its ways.

The report, as portrayed in the article, seems astonishing in a number of ways (Dahlia Scheindlin has written about it here).  First, its contents seem heavily influenced by student evaluations of the program.  While student opinion should perhaps be a factor in such an evaluation, it should be a minor one at best since there are far more important factors in determining the quality of program.  But one thing the large amount of student input tells us is that the committee collaborated in ways large or small with Im Tirzu and other pro-Zionist academic advocacy groups which have been on the warpath regarding Ben Gurion in general and this program in particular.

I’ve written here about the University president’s invitation to faculty member Neve Gordon, to quit the school after he wrote a Los Angeles Times calling supporting the BDS movement.  Shortly after this controversy, the department responded to her high-handed tactics by appointing him its chair.  Now, it appears some in the University, Im Tirtzu and the Israeli far-right are taking the battle to a new venue.

Here are some of the real doozies in the Yediot article:

The department is known to have no small number of researchers with extreme leftist tendencies, who have expressed controversial views.

Among the views they featured were Neve Gordon’s supposed comments (and “radical ones” at that) during a class, that Gilad Shalit’s capture was not an act of terror, but rather a military attack.  Another faculty member, Danny Filk, organized official University meetings at which Im Tirzu claims only those from the “left camp” were permitted to address the gathering.

Another issue that bothered the committee was the faculty’s lack of care in making clear to students what their personal political views were in the course of classroom teaching.  Apparently, it believes that students aren’t able to distinguish between a professor’s politics and the course subject matter.  Nor did the reviewers like at all the supposed emphasis faculty made on political activism, which would distract from the serious pursuit of scholarly research.  They also claim that teachers do not represent a diverse set of views in their classrooms, but rather tend to present their own views and omit those conflicting with them.

Prof. Galia Golan, a member of the committee, disputed its findings, saying that the claim that the professors inserted their own views too prominently into the curriculum violated the fundamental value of academic freedom.

Scheindlin, in her 972Magazine post asked how could they know what ideas or values were espoused by professors in class when all of them, except for Golan, neither spoke nor read Hebrew.  Did they have classroom presentations translated for them into their native languages so they could evaluate?

She points out another coincidence: Education minister Gideon Saar is the chair of the Israeli Council on Higher Education and a devout supporter of Im Tirzu.  Could it be possible that the appointment of the committee was done at the behest of the minister and his friends in the far-right Israeli group?

The current department chair, Prof. Filk, dismissed the committee’s findings as a political witch hunt and noted that it was the most popular of its kind in any Israeli university.  He also noted that the evidence offered in the report was often faulty and simply wrong.  A senior member of the faculty went event farther:

This was an outside committee a portion of whose members have pronounced extreme right-wing views that created a reported fundamentally flawed.  Theirs is a political report whose agenda was to damage the department through exploitation of outside extremist groups [like Im Tirzu].

Prof. Carmi defended the department from charges that it wasn’t focussed enough on the traditional elements of the political science discipline by saying that this was precisely the mission of its program: to see the academic field from non-conventional, non-traditional viewpoints. This is why the faculty includes a medical doctor and architect among its members.

The truth is that for years now Im Tirzu and rightist Israeli academics have had it in for both the University and this department claiming it isn’t sufficiently “Zionist.”  That because it entertains views critical of Zionism or, God forbid, even anti-Zionist, that it departs from the national consensus.  Therefore a call for shutting down the program is music to their ears.  But as Galia Golan noted in her demurral, there is an even more important issue here: the critical need to support free inquiry and academic freedom.  In presenting their subjects to students and the wider world, they must do so in ways that are true to their own sense of themselves as academics and researchers.  They must not be pressured to present a certain point of view to the exclusion of others.

On a Collision Course: Israel, Iran and the U.S.

Wednesday, November 23rd, 2011

UPDATE: This event has been postponed till February. I apologize for any inconvenience.

on a collision course: iran, israel, and the U.s.Is a military strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities possible as a result of the dramatically increasing and unstable relationship among Iran, Israel and the U.S.? What does this mean for them, for us, for the rest of the world? Two outstanding speakers will address this complex issue at Seattle’s St. Mark’s Episcopal Cathedral on Friday, December 2nd at 7:30PM.

USC Chemical Engineering Prof. Muhammad Sahimi, who has written extensively on Iranian politics and that country’s nuclear program will join Richard Silverstein, writer of the progressive political blog, Tikun Olam for this discussion of these critical and complex issues. These will include the current program of covert black ops like the Iranian missile base explosion last week, cyberwarfare in the form of Stuxnet, economic sanctions and whether they can work, and whether Iran is pursuing a nuclear weapon. If so, what can/should the world do about it, if anything?

The evening will also include film clips from PBS and KUOW travel guru Rick Steves’ program,“Iran: Yesterday and Today.”

Sahimi is an active journalist having written for Payvand, Antiwar.com and the Huffington Post. He has been a regular columnist for PBS Frontline’s Tehran Bureau since 2008, and has written also for the Los Angeles Times, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Harvard International Review and The Progressive.

Silverstein was recently featured in a front page NY Times story about his involvement with FBI whistleblower Shamai Leibowitz, who leaked secret U.S. transcripts documenting the aggressive intervention of Israeli diplomats into U.S. politics in order to create a hostile, anti-Iran climate. Silverstein is currently a regular contributor to Truthout and has also contributed to Comment is Free and Al Jazeera English.

The event is sponsored by Sabeel Puget Sound, the Cathedral’s Mideast Focus Ministry and American Friends Service Committee. Admission to the event is by donation. If you cannot attend but would like to help defray costs, please click the Paypal button in the sidebar. Tax-deductible donations may be made by special arrangement with SABEEL. Contact me for further information. Join the Facebook event page or invite others in the Pacific NW who might attend.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE