Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for November, 2010

Oklahoma, Goddam!

Monday, November 15th, 2010


During the 1960s, the State of Mississippi had race relations so strained, so violent, so primitive that it often appeared the place was a holdover from an earlier era of human brutality perhaps before civilization took hold.  There were ambush killings, church bombings, rapes, lynchings, snarling police dogs, poll taxes, Jim Crow laws, Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, all designed to enforce a regime of white supremacy so strident, that it might’ve even made a few southerners blanche (not that states like Alabama weren’t far beyond).  This notion of Mississippi inspired Nina Simone’s angry, bitter and seminal, Mississippi, God-Damn.  To this day, I don’t think the state has fully lived down this legacy, at least not in the minds of outsiders.

Apparently wishing to repeat this sordid history, Oklahoma has put forward its own name for latest state to be bathed in the muck of racism, hate and ignorance.  In this case, Oklahoma’s special enemy isn’t blacks, but Muslims.  There’s no indication there are huge ‘glut’ of Muslims in Oklahoma, let alone that they’ve brought any sort of Muslim contagion with them that might engulf the state.  But the Knights of the Anti-Jihad aren’t taking any chances.  They want to be prepared when the “cancer” finally comes to them:

[Corey] Williams was one of 10 Democrats who voted against putting a state constitutional amendment on the ballot that would forbid state judges from considering international or Islamic law in deciding cases…His Republican challenger sent out mailers showing him next to a shadowy figure in an Arab headdress. On the other side, the flier said Mr. Williams wanted to allow “Islamic ‘Shariah’ law to be used by Oklahoma courts” and suggested that he was part of “an international movement, supported by militant Muslims and liberals,” to establish Islamic law throughout the world.

…The amendment passed with 70 percent of the vote and helped drive record turnout in Republican strongholds. For the first time in the state, Republicans will now control the governor’s office and have veto-proof majorities in both houses of the Legislature…Voters overwhelmingly approved measures making English the state’s official language and requiring picture identification at the polls. Democrats maintain that both measures make it harder for Hispanic immigrants to vote or go to school.

…Supporters of the [anti-Sharia] amendment acknowledge that there is no evidence Islamic law had ever been brought up as a defense in the state courts….“This is a pre-emptive strike,” said the bill’s main author, State Representative Rex Duncan, a Republican from Sand Springs.

Before the vote, Mr. Duncan described…Shariah tribunals in England as “a cancer” and predicted that Muslims would come to America to take away “liberties and freedom from our children.” In an interview on MSNBC, he said: “This is a war for the survival of America. It’s a cultural war.” (In 2007, Mr. Duncan rejected a gift of a Koran from a council Mr. Henry created, saying, “Most Oklahomans do not endorse the idea of killing innocent women and children in the name of ideology.”)

I don’t mind that much if Neanderthals like Duncan are honest and straightforward about their hatreds.  But most of these lunatics attempt to persuade themselves and their constituents that they’re not racists, oh no not them, Heaven forbid.  So when CAIR won an injunction to stop enforcement of the amendment under state law, its sponsor was in high dudgeon about the offense such an injunction offered the good people of Oklahoma:

Mr. Duncan said the restraining order “thwarts the will of the people.” He said the amendment was never intended as an attack on Muslims, but as an effort to prevent what he called “activist judges” from using Islamic law in deciding cases.

Well, of course it wasn’t an attack on Muslims.  They were just the handiest nearby whipping boy when they devised this cuckoo strategy to win a lock on state politics.  In that sense, Muslims were interchangeable with any number of historic bugaboos exploited throughout American history to maintain power: Know Nothings, anti-immigrant parties, anti-Papists, Ku Klux Klan.

What this moron doesn’t realize though is that his amendment will outlaw not just application of Sharia to state law, but the use of Jewish or Roman Catholic canon law in adjudicating legal decisions.  That may mean that, for example, an Orthodox Jew may not be allowed to have a religious marriage or divorce.  Didn’t think of that, did ya dunderhead?

If Oklahoma doesn’t watch out, there will those of us lobbying for a constitutional amendment to outlaw the wonderful Rodgers and Hammerstein musical, Oklahoma, as being far too good for what Oklahoma really deserves.  Instead, we’ll lobby that its new state song become: Mississippi, God-Damn.  We’ll rename it, Oklahoma, God-Damn.

Hey, MSM: What Are We, Chopped Liver?

Monday, November 15th, 2010

chopped liverThis post is a meditation on the relationship between blogs and the mainstream media in this narrow niche of the blogosphere related to the Arab-Israeli conflict.    What are we to them?  What are they to us?  Do we want to join ‘em?  Can we even if we wanted to?  Do we want them to join us?  Would they even if they could?  Do we want to write for ‘em?  Is it worth the trouble?  Will they come to us anyway if our reporting is vital and exclusive enough?

I’m like most ambitious political bloggers…I have a strong point of view and I not only want my readers to know it, but I want to reach the broadest possible audience.  And in my case I want to do this not only here, but in Israel and really anywhere in the world that the conflict is major political currency.  I relish my opportunities to commune with a larger audience.  Until a year ago or so, I had a semi-regular gig doing that at Comment is Free.  When that ended, I had a short-lived gig at Al Jazeera English until Firas Atrachi left his editor’s job there.  For some time after those outlets stopped being interested in my work, I was not only frustrated and upset, I aggressively sought out other opportunities.  I even got as far as a kill fee (but only after I asked for it upon rejection) for a piece commissioned by the London Review of Books!

And don’t get me wrong, I would go a long way for such gigs.  But I’ve developed a grudging acceptance that my place may not be in the more MSM (and within this I unfortunately include the progressive media outlets which also uniformly have rejected my work).  At least not as a bylined author.  There may be many reasons for this.  Maybe they’re important and worth cogitating about and maybe not.

In at least two recent instances, editors asked me to write pieces on spec for them without making any commitment that it would be published.  I turned them down.  I think those days are over.  Gee, it would be nice to be published in a certain progressive national Jewish journal, but not if it first requires a crapshoot, not knowing if what I slave over will end up in print or in someone’s Deleted Items folder.  Either it’s because I’m somehow beyond that or now I have the bully pulpit of this blog in a way I didn’t have until recently (more on this in the following paragraph).

Just because something I want like publication in the mainstream doesn’t happen doesn’t leave me by the wayside.  In some sense, since the Anat Kamm story, I have found a focus for my work that I did not have previously.  Now I understand that one of my most important contributions (thanks to an important collaborator) will be in tracking the vicissitudes of Israeli democracy through the particular lens of national security and its intelligence services.  Who watches the spooks?  In Israel, not terribly many.

But let’s return to how this post originated: I spend more time promoting this blog on Facebook than on Twitter since it seems to generate more traffic and more readers appear to be on Facebook and interact with the blog from it.  So last night, I did something I do very rarely.  I reviewed those 475 Twitter followers I have.  And I was struck by something interesting.  Quite a number of them were journalists.  Yes, some were NGO staffers, one even a retired CEO of a major medical technology company, another a Jewish federation executive, and pretty dubiously the SecyClintonBlog (NOTE: sincere apologies to Stacy Beam, who created this blog, which has no affiliation with the State Dept., and who does not approve of Clinton’s approach to the I-P conflict).

But the journalists were what interested me since I’d already noticed a number of journalists who subscribed to this blog.  One of most unlikely ones would appear to be the Israel correspondent for a certain American cable news company that is extremely fair and balanced.  Not sure what she expects to find here unless perhaps stories that she can tell her New York bosses she would never cover.

Well, perhaps that subscriber is a bit more likely than the assistant coach for a certain NBA team that recently deserted Seattle (no fault of his, I might add) for greener pastures.  I was also tickled that during my coverage of the Uri Blau-Anat Kamm story, Haaretz editor Dov Alfon started following my Tweets.  I have no way of knowing whether this is true (though someone I respect who is quite cautious about these matters affirmed his conviction that it is true), but Alfon may possibly also have posted a critical comment on my coverage here using the rather elegant nom de plume of Schockentchick (as in “apparatchik”), which I at first glance misread as “Schocken chick,” leading me to wonder why a female Haaretz reporter would refer to herself in such an odd way.

Others that are more standard and follow this blog in some fashion include reporters for the BBC, The Independent, Haaretz, Jerusalem Post (and even a very senior editor, sha-shtill!), Time Magazine, Maan News, 7th Eye, PRI’s The World, and Think Progress.

While I was looking over this list I thought to myself: instead of following me, why don’t you actually incorporate more of my point of view into your reporting?  When you look at some of the most prominent correspondents for the more reputable publications and look at who their informants are it makes one’s eyes glaze over.  Yesterday, I linked to a piece by Josh Rogin at Foreign Policy on the settlement freeze extension negotiation.  Who was his main informant?  Robert Wexler.  I kid you not.  Wexler was Obama’s Florida’s Jewish errand boy for the last election campaign and left Congress nearly two years ago and for some reason is still a valued commentator.  Not that I would begrudge Wexler if he had anything in the least illuminating to say.  But it was the same standard, boring, soft-core drivel that you hear over and over from Administration hacks (or was that “flacks?”) who are spinning for one master or another.

Ethan Bronner too has been a pet peeve of mine in these pages as someone who drones on and often producing neither heat nor light.  Why are these people afraid of introducing into the mix viewpoints less often heard?  Of course, part of the reason is that the reporters themselves have a very limited range of vision for their subject and therefore naturally wouldn’t even think that a more challenging voice should be incorporated into the mix.

I should take a modest step back here to acknowledge that since I’ve begun reporting more intensively on Israeli intelligence matters my blog has been picked up more widely in sources like the N.Y. Times and all the major Israeli publications with the exception of the erstwhile liberal one, Haaretz (go figure).  I’ve been interviewed and/or profiled by media in Switzerland, Turkey, Russia, and Israel.  In a sense I even owe that hated emblem of Iraq-era reporting, Judith Miller, a major shout out.  She discovered my reporting on Anat Kamm and featured it in The Daily Beast.  Yes, I’m sorry to say that at times in this day and age it requires a celebrity journalist to really break a story.  And sometimes you even learn to trust a reporter whose politics you may disagree with to do the right thing on this particular story.  Had she not taken this up, the Israeli press wouldn’t have reached a critical mass of publicly-expressed ridicule that led to the Shabak relenting on Kamm’s gag order.  Had they not done so, who knows whether Kamm might still be under secret detention facing a life sentence.

Another post that spurred some of my thinking on this was Phil Weiss’ report of a talk given by the estimable Israeli blogger and freelance journalist, Noam Sheizaf of Promised Land.  Noam seems to really be feeling to power of his own blog to impact the public political and media discourse, which led him to say (I’m including some of Phil’s set-up):

He [Noam] told us of his own success. Reporters at the New York Times and Politico follow him on twitter; this would have been incomprehensible to him as a young journalist, that he would ever have that type of influence inside the Beltway:

“And this is what I wanted, to have a political impact. Blogging is not just reporting, it is engaged reporting. We are engaged in an internal battle in Israel. I’m using these tools of facebook and twitter to push something…

“I live-blogged [the flotilla] for four days from the Hebrew media. Traffic to my site went up ten times. [It took the IDF five hours to get out its version of the story.] And those five  hours framed much of how the story was handled and Israel has done damage control since then. And I understand why Hamas has said, the flotilla is better than 10,000 rockets.”

Sheizaf’s pieces have been linked by the The Washington Post and The New York Times, but those links are chopped liver next to Glenn Greenwald. “When Glenn Greenwald said, go to this guy on Twitter– Glenn Greenwald is like a mega important person on the net, who is hardly known in the mainstream… Social media changes everything in the game.”

I should make clear that while I’m very sympathetic to Noam’s narrative and believed it at one time myself (and in fact, wrote a chapter, The Blogging Wars, for the Independent Jewish Voices book, A Time to Speak Out, on precisely this subject making almost precisely this claim), I’m no longer so sure he’s right.  Or at least, not so sure he’s right in the way he thinks he is.

Yes, as bloggers we are earning a larger share of the “pie” of public attention for our reporting.  This is happening, in my estimation, because of the desperation of current political circumstances which are turning both the MSM and their normal readers to new and different alternative sources.  It’s also happening because more and more the mainstream reporters don’t have the goods and we do.  We’re breaking stories that either they used to break, or that they can’t break, or that their editors have no interest in letting them break.

But I’m not sure that we’re really impacting the MSM in any real or serious way.  That we’re impacting the overall discourse, of that I am sure.  But really how much does having a NY Times or Politico reporter follow you on Twitter indicate in terms of whether you’re penetrating the Beltway political haze?  And yes, Glenn Greenwald, when he does report on the conflict does excellent work, but he hardly seems engaged in any serious way with the work of those of us who are on the firing line doing this sort of original reporting.  That Greenwald plugged Noam’s Twitter feed is terrific.  But how much does it all mean?

So, my main question to all of you is what do we as bloggers with distinctive, important political voices  rarely heard in the mainstream want from them?  What do we have the right to expect?  And how should we go about getting it?  My conviction is that there is now a critical mass of progressive blog reporting on the Israeli-Arab conflict that deserves wider circulation and prominence.  Some of us like Ali Abunimah seem to make their own breaks and turn their operations into spectacularly successful platforms to disseminate their perspective.  Others of us seem to fight and struggle for every scrap of recognition that comes our way.  My question is how do we do more of the former and less of the latter?  How do we make those breaks for ourselves? Or will those breaks come to those of us who, to parapharse Milton, serve by standing and waiting, all the while doing the hard slog of reporting those stories that no one else can, or knows how to report?

Going Rate for Settlement Freeze: $33.33-Million a Day

Sunday, November 14th, 2010
hillary and bibi

Hillary and Bibi look a little the worse for wear after 7 hours negotiating which candy Israel would get for agreeing to freeze extension (Mary Altaffer/AP)

America is used to buying its way to quasi-peace in Iraq and Afghanistan and appears to be doing something similar by buying Israel’s acquiescence in a 90-day, partial settlement freeze.  The going price: $33.33-million a day for the entire 90 day process [thanks readers, for correcting my math!].  Now, we know what Hillary and Bibi were doing in that New York hotel suite for seven hours earlier this week.  It wasn’t canoodling!  But she was virtually giving away the store.

As a way of computing the comparative value of Palestinian obeisance.  Clinton earlier this week held a press conference announcing a new U.S. contribution to the PA.  Pricetag?  $150-million (or about $1.5-million per day).  The first thing the Palestinians need to learn how to do is drive a harder bargain.  They bought ‘em cheap.

I say ‘partial’ because Israel will be free to continue “Judaizing” East Jerusalem by unlimited building there, which includes 1,300 units announced earlier this month.  Such “Judaizing” settlement building doesn’t include the additional quasi-legal expropriation and pilfering of existing Palestinian homes in East Jerusalem coördinated by settler land-theft groups like Elad and Irving Moskowitz’s syndicate.  The building freeze will also not apply to public buildings like hospitals, schools, police stations anywhere in the West Bank or Jerusalem.

f-35 jet fighter

Bibi's candy store gift

I remain mystified why this freeze extension was so important it was worth paying so dearly for in security guarantees and weapons sales.  After all, this is practically a year’s worth of U.S. military aid to Israel in three months!  The $3-billion amounts to the cost of 20 new U.S. F-35 fighter jets (one wonders to what mischief Israel could put them regarding a few military adventures it is angling to take on…).

Not to mention, the U.S. has also agreed to veto any Arab/Palestinian effort to bring its proposal for recognition of statehood before the Security Council (at least for the next three months).  Further, this statement from Obama’s in-house version of Dennis Ross, Dan Shapiro, indicates the U.S. will combat world-wide “de-legitimization” (a new pro-Israel hasbarist buzzword) efforts against Israel as part of this bargain:

They included increased U.S. diplomatic opposition to efforts to delegitimize Israel in international fora, continuing to block efforts to revive the Goldstone Report at the United Nations, promising to block condemnation of Israel at the United Nations for its raid on the Gaza-bound Mavi Marmara, and defeating resolutions aimed to expose Israel’s nuclear program at the IAEA, and increasing pressure on Iran and Syria to stop their nuclear and proliferation activities.

Not only do we give these guys a jet fighter armada, we destroy any moral credibility we might have on the world stage on their behalf.  Now, I’m really starting to get mad!

What can Obama have in his mind that he can achieve with this?  Certainly, he can now get Abbas to come back to the negotiating table.  So we resume a semblance of negotiating process without any substance.  The Times article says the U.S. believes in the coming three months it can get both sides to agree on what land will be retained by the PA and what land will be retained by Israel.  After that, Israel may resume building in only the areas which both sides have confirmed will remain Israeli.  Frankly, I don’t see it.  Neither side has come anywhere near such an agreement previously and not for lack of trying.  Most recently, Olmert presented such formal border proposals to Abbas who sniffed at them and replied: “Not good enough.”  What’s changed?  Has Israel’s offer sweetened (puh-leeze)?  Has Palestinian desperation increased?  Not really.  So what gives?  I say nothin’.

Is this what was so important to the president to achieve?  To save face before the American people so he can tell them for the next three months there IS a peace process…until it breaks down once again as it invariably will.  I know he’s had a hard Asia trip and took a shellacking in the mid-terms.  But was this worth it?

You see, there is one major ingredient missing: commitment.  Not just Israel’s commitment, which is the major missing factor.  But surprising as it may seem, Obama’s commitment as well.  Like most other American presidents before him with the exception of Jimmy Carter and George Bush pere, they come in with blizzards of words and precious little in the way of real gumption.  In Middle East peace negotiation, you can’t get there without it.  And Obama definitely ain’t got it.  He’s got the razzle-dazzle.  He’s sort of a political version of the Shyne character I wrote about yesterday, with his [Shyne's] elegant fedora and shades.  But you need more than a glib tongue [Obama's] in this region.  You need deeds, you need heart, you need guts.  Obama’s got brain, but no brawn.

I was also concerned that Hillary Clinton’s statement after her latest love fest with Bibi in New York indicated that the U.S. had already negotiated away an issue key to the Palestinian interlocutors:

In the second, she spoke of an agreement that “reconciles the Palestinian goal of an independent and viable state, based on the 1967 lines, with agreed swaps, and the Israeli goal of a Jewish state…

So all Bibi needs to say now is: the Yanks agreed we’re a Jewish state, why not the Palestinians?  I think the U.S. just gave Bibi an enormous hunk of halva with that $3-billion.

Tikun Olam Nominated for Brass Crescent Award

Saturday, November 13th, 2010

I’m grateful once again for being nominated for a Brass Crescent award for best non-Muslim blog, which respects Islam and encourages dialogue with it.

I never win these things and have no hope this time.  But I’d encourage you to visit the site not only to vote for me but to broaden your experience of Islam online.  There are many captivating blog titles and topics covered by blogs that are nominated, which I look forward to delving into as soon as I get over this virus that’s still stalking me.

After Deportation, Shyne Turns to Black-Hats for Redemption, to Score Points for Immigration Appeal

Saturday, November 13th, 2010
shyne in haredi black hat

Shyne dons ultra-Orthodox threads lookin' for redemption & U.S. visa (Ricki Rosen)

Since the latter days of Meyer Lansky till now, Israel seems to embody in the minds of sinners, charlatans and other hypsters a place of redemption and moral repentance.  Most of us if we sin, find ways of repenting quietly, in private.  But there are others in this world, largely gangsters, celebrities and others of that ilk who need to do everything writ large.  And for some reason, they’re drawn to the Land of Israel as a special place, a land of last chances and lost causes, a land that embraces misfits and turns them into something pure and worthy.

Now add to the list the rapper Shyne, ne Jamaal Barrow.  Not content merely to serve his ten years in prison for wounding club patrons in a gunfight, he’s got to tell the world that he’s taken his repentance to a whole other level.  In fact, he’s taken his case directly to the man Upstairs: he’s converted to Judaism.  And not just any Judaism, but black-hat ultra-Orthodox Judaism.  And I’ve got to say that I’ve never seen anyone look more elegant in Haredi black hat than Shyne.  He’s really stylin’!

But there are a few holdovers from his former life that Shyne can’t seem to shake:

“There’s nothing in the Chumash that says I can’t drive a Lamborghini,” and “nothing in the Halacha about driving the cars I like, about the lifestyle I live.”

A bit of explication is in order.  Of course, his Haredi guides love his Lamborghinis and would tell him Judaism has nothing against them, because they know that one of theirs who drives a Lamborghini will have lots of money left over the fund their various Haredi yeshivas and other charities.  Both sides here are exploiting the other: Shyne is using Judaism to wipe his slate clean of some nasty behavior; and Shyne’s ultra-Orthodox teachers are exploiting his fame to advance their own agenda.  They’re hoping he’ll drop a big check in their lap one of these days.

I do so love the comment about the Chumash not prohibiting him driving a Lamborghini since the first one wasn’t built until 1963, while the Chumash is at least a few years older.  I don’t even think the Model T was a gleam in Moses eye, myself.  But maybe Shyne knows better.  And as for halacha and Jewish ethics, they do have quite a bit to say about the ways in which one should present oneself in society and truly observant Jews are never ostentatious in the way Shyne is.  Nor do they brandish pistols and shoot people in clubs.  That’s a definite no-no in our halacha.

But I do have a suggestion: if he wants to become a truly good shot he might consider enlisting in the IDF (which would also love to exploit his fame as much as haredim).  The army could turn him into not just a gangsta and a killa, but a cold-blooded assassin.  It might even be conducive to a future rap career.  Imagine the Palestinian “kills” he could brag about to his audience.

I wondered why Shyne came to Israel after exiting prison till I read in the article that the U.S. deported him, as he was not a citizen.  He is appealing his deportation.  In other words, his conversion is a shameless publicity stunt meant to aid in his regaining his U.S. residency while also keeping his career in the news.  When he was deported where else could he go?  Belize, where he was born and where his father is prime minister?  Guess daddy didn’t want his son the gunman making things hot for him there.  So he turns to Israel as that pure and holy place which will purge his sin in the eyes of U.S. immigration authorities.

We’ll see.  But even if the U.S. doesn’t budge, there is a flourishing hip hop scene in Israel, even among Orthodox Jews.  So maybe he can find a home for himself.  But if you ask me, Israel is a waystation, a way to get where he really wants to go, and that ain’t Jerusalem.

Israel Warns Citizens to Return Home from Sinai Immediately Due to High Level Terror Alert

Saturday, November 13th, 2010
sinai terror threat

Israeli National Security Council terror threat

Israel’s National Security Council issued its highest-level terror threat (“red-very high-concrete threat based on reliable intelligence”) for the Sinai and urged all Israelis to leave immediately and return to Israel.  It urged Israelis with family members visiting Sinai to contact loved ones and tell them to cut short their visits.  According to the Israel terror threat, it is related to the Gaza-based Army of Islam, which Israel claims is influenced by “global jihad” (whatever that means) and a terror cell affiliated with it is operating in Sinai and seeking to kidnap Israeli tourists.

In its background to the alert, Israel merely says that it “attacked” Army of Islam “activist” Muhammad Nimnim in Gaza, when in actuality it murdered him.  The warning claims that Nimnim was involved in the “development” of the attack.  Time Magazine further credits Egyptian intelligence with capturing some of Nimnim’s cell in Sinai and says the Egyptians tipped off Shabak about his involvement leading to the hit.  It should be noted that though Time does not acknowledge a source, it clearly is an Israeli intelligence source and therefore not reliable (but interesting nevertheless).

Time further states that the target in Sinai was a military-intelligence base, El Gorah, which houses the Multi-National Force and Observers.  Interestingly, the commander of Forces’ Cairo office told the magazine he knew of no threat to the base.  How would the senior staff member of the Force not know of a threat yet both Egyptian and Israeli intelligence would?

In earlier Shabak-IDF claims after his killing, it made the grandiose statement that Army of Islam also intended to hit American targets, which led a Haaretz reporter to ask whether Israel had consulted the U.S. before killing Nimnim.  When the IDF spokesperson did not deny the reporter’s question outright, it led many to believe Israel wanted to create the impression that the U.S. approved of the hit.  Later, the IDF denied it had received American approval.  And the U.S. government never issued any statement, which I found slightly odd.

The current Israeli NSC terror warning mentions no American target at all.  One wonders why they’ve changed their tune when the American component in the earlier reports was quite prominent.

When Israeli Police Become Criminals, Who Protects Citizens?

Wednesday, November 10th, 2010
Israeli suspect assaulted by police

Israeli Palestinian suspect publicly assaulted by police

In this blog, I focus less on purely internal Israeli politics and more on the bigger picture of Israeli democracy and relations with its Palestinian minority and the Occupation.  But Eyal Clyne has written a riveting, tremendously comprehensive report on a massive pattern of corruption and violence by the police against the entire Israeli public.  The culture of brutality exhibited by the Israeli police can only flourish in a nation obsessed, as Israel is, by security.  It can only flourish in a nation which had made a Faustian bargain with the police and security forces: protect us and we will allow you anything.

Israeli peace activists often argue quite persuasively that the incredibly high level of corruption and violence within Israeli society is due in large part to the corrupting influence of the Occupation.  In the cases you’ll read below, you’ll find that the violence exhibited by the police against its own fellow citizens appears to be learned in large part from the brutality officers see and practice during their own IDF service.  The toxic apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.

I am not making the claim, nor does Eyal, that there are not police forces in virtually any and every country which commit grievous acts that remind us of what we’ll read here.  In fact, in the 1970s and 80s a number of U.S. cities in which I lived, including New York and Los Angeles had police forces which tended to run roughshod over any member of the public that was in its path.  The records of police brutality are long and legion in such places.   But thankfully, this systemic pattern of behavior has been largely rooted out leaving only individual examples that make headlines at regular intervals.

Israeli policing seems stuck somewhere back in the 1970s in U.S. terms.  Here are some of Eyal’s most egregious examples.  There are more links in this post than I’ve ever seen in any other and unfortunately for most of you, they are in Hebrew.  I admire that Eyal has offered evidence in the form of links for every claim he makes.  It makes his post even more powerful and damning.

He begins with the story of an Israeli man wanted by police in a domestic violence dispute.  His encounter with the police didn’t end well for him.  Israeli news coverage says that when the man tried to speed away in his vehicle a police officer, cowboy-like, jumped on the hood of his car and proceeded to shoot him numerous times all over his body:

Yesterday, a policeman shot and killed a suspect. The suspect was very suspicious. He was suspected of being obsessive, of harassment, and of resisting arrest. There are those who also say he was suspected of an attempted vehicular assault [on the police officer].  These turned out to be capital crimes. The late suspect was “lucky” not to be an Arab, because as a Jew, the circumstances of his death are at the very least questioned. It also turns out that the suspect may have been obsessive, but the policeman also demonstrated some obsessiveness of his own. Rather than moving aside he clung to the engine hood, and shot the driver to death, both in the upper and lower parts of his body several times.  Once was not enough.

The Ynet news portal apparently saw this shooting as being justified, or at least understandable, as their headlines stated unequivocally that the event was “an attempted vehicular killing”, which contradicted both on-the-scene testimony and the assaulting policeman’s own history – and well before any investigation had occurred.

Israel’s police often does not live up to the directives of the law and tend to be rude, violent, flawed in terms of conduct, and characterized by a masterful resolve to show the citizenry just who is boss.

Israeli police violence

Israeli police violence: 'Get on the bus before I break your bones."

…In the Israel police there is a norm of violence and a lordly attitude; policemen take it upon themselves to act in a rude and criminal manner; and they enjoy nearly automatic backing from their commanders, who are also afflicted by this dysfunctional approach.

…The famous slogan “To Serve and Protect” is okay for television drama series – it has nothing to do with life in Israel. You might want to ask just who serves whom and admit that what gets protected is first and foremost the honor of the policeman, not the rights of the citizens. No, the word “honor” does not mean fairness, integrity, and professionalism. It refers, instead, to the questionable “honor” that we meet in the phrase “honor killing.” It is the honor demanded by thugs in the ‘hood, except that it wears a uniform and badge. If you “offend” them (and they get offended easily; they’re quite sensitive) they could bite your lip right off your facebeat, humiliate, and sexually harass youfine you for NIS 1,000, have you kicked out of the Civil Guardarrest you, and spray you with gas. It’s as if you work for the policemen rather than the other way around.

That’s what it’s like with bullies. Just give them power, a weapon, or a certificate and they’ll harass everyone, just because they can. They’ll pour your beer out on the beach, harass passers-by on the street (herehere, and here), break your nosebeat the **** out of you and mock youthrow stonesopen fire for no reason, and harass women (while threatening them with arrests). On the road you must never tell them when they drive wildlypark illegally, and even when a 70-year old man dares challenge anything – he’ll catch flackOn soccer fields they bust your faces (see also herehereherehere, and in all items linked from there), and at home they’ll fine you for groaning too loudlyattack you with bare fistswrestle with you, and commit perjury when testifying about it, to cover up. On personal time they will be “role models of crime”: they’ll call prostitutes to the stationsteal money from suspectsplace explosive chargesgive false testimony, and drop by in the middle of the night without a warrant, just to scare someone whom they see as calling for the oversight of police forces. One of the senior staffers in the Violence Prevention Department went so far in his quest to be a role model that he actually attacked a woman subordinate employee, working in his department.

Abuse of authority shows up at every stage of criminal proceedings, from the use of violence on the scene through illegal and false arrests, interrogations, and trial…The policemen abuse the laxness in the justice system to do anything they want to citizens, arresting people at their whimfalse arrests,unlawfully, including the arrest of children, as well as threatening arrest, which is all done violently and in contravention of the law (see also: herehere,hereherehereherehere, and here). While they’re at it they can also humiliate people: right-wing activists, a motorcycle thiefPalestinians, etc. Sometimes they also arrest and humiliate run-of-the-mill people due to a simple mistaken identity. Yet, some of these cases end up in death, like the policeman who killed a suspect, and another policeman who fatally shot a suspect, the policeman who cursed and fired his weapon, thus causing of death of a detainee, and the policeman who threw a metal bar at a moving motorcyclist.

…Israeli Judges are pretty easy to co-opt, and for that reason innocent people (and that could be any of us) spend months in custody, for no reason. Startin’ to get the picture? Well, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

While under arrest the police are supposed to protect us, our property and our bodies. In practice, they act in violation of the law: they handcuff minors for hours, and handcuffed people are attacked while cuffed, inside the police station, and are sprayed with mace. Policemen have also hit a suspect to the point of rendering him paralyzed, and police officers take part, as well, and slam the heads of bound detainees against the wall. In one of the false arrests, which was accompanied by a warrantless search, a young detainee was beaten for hours and raped.

…The ‘romantic’ notion of investigation is entirely detached from true reality, where the police has spent years covering up justified complaintsfalsifying evidence, and adopting untrue testimonies when it felt easier. In other cases evidence “disappeared” (CDs herehard disks there, the end of the tape went missing here, and the entire tape was gone here). In the course of the investigation they also violate the right to counsel, the right to make a phone call, they steal money from suspects and violate the rights of detainees (many of whom are innocent) – and all these are stories just from the last few months.

…Judges have had to rule several times that policemen were lying, and that rather than demonstrators attacking policemen, policemen had actually attacked demonstrators. In fact, in this interview, the video showing in the background demonstrates a policeman kicking a detainee. Of course, even in those cases the policemen were not charged. In general, courts naïvely ascribe good faith to the people charged with upholding the law. The astonishing fact that 99%(!) of wiretaps requests are approved by the courts is indicative of this, as are the many cases when the court simply ignores clear evidence at the request of the police. So if you think that after the investigation you will have a fair trial, you are wrong again. Despite the fact that policemen regularly lie to the courts, unless you can prove that the policemen are lying…you will be in dire straits and the judges will prefer to believe their lies. And sometimes, even proving that they’re lying is not enough. Finally, if you are actually charged with a crime, you have veritably no chance of being exonerated, since in Israel more than 98%(!) of defendants are convicted.

…Legally speaking, the police are supposed to ensure your right to protest – but…more than anything else they want “quiet”, and they try and achieve it in several stages. First they try to prevent the demonstrations, which is illegal (this happened in demonstrations against the disengagementagainst the siege of Gaza, of Hasidophobics in Bnei Brak, in extreme right-wing rallies in Umm Al-Fahm, in front of the offices of the Islamic Movement, and in Silwan, and of the left in Sheikh Jarrah, and in the Occupied Territories). If the demonstrators have the resources to appeal to the Supreme Court, the demonstration will take place, and the next stage involves dispersing the demonstrators (to smithereens). The policemen arrive on the scene all fired up, and only the identity of the people suffering their rage changes: sometimes these are ultra-orthodox Jews (see: herehereand here), then they are settlers and right-wing activists (herehereherehereherehere, and here), or students (hereherehere). Or it could be motorcyclists protesting, or those evicted from their homes by the rich, and of course, left-wing activists and Arabs (herehere,hereherehereherehereherehereherehere). And there is still more! Here it is on Google Video, and here it is on YouTube. And when the bullies are above the law, it is hardly surprising that consequences are devastating: tear gas killed a toddler, police fire killed a little girl (and yet, the investigation was closed).

In demonstrations and on soccer fields, say the numerous testimonies and evidence, there is a police norm of hiding name-tags and faces, to prevent identification. This extends to officers, as well. People do not hide their identity unless they have something to fear and, like robbers, policemen know that they do, in fact, have something to hide. It is only the unlawful anonymity which protects them from accountability, and they prepare for it because they know that this way they can beat people up when they like. The problem of police violence is especially acute in the Border Patrol and the Special Patrol Units, which are sent out, again and again, to demonstrations and soccer games to “do the job” (i.e. beat up innocent civilians, and while they’re at it, conduct unlawful arrests with great violence, and never be held accountable). Israeli cops forget that they are not here to create the law but rather to enforce it, and they persistently make up rules on the spot (such as prohibiting the flying of one flag or another, stating that there is no permit for a demonstration which does not actually require a permit, and so forth). This is how it happens that – although the right to demonstrate is a basic right in a democracy, and although the policemen are supposed to protect those rights – in practice they do everything they can to prevent them, and on the scene they become a source of unbridled violence that no-one can handle.

…Something is rotten in the kingdom of handcuffs. The stench is unbearable. The Israel police has become one of the greatest problems in the State of Israel. More and more of its personnel, who are supposed to be in charge of law enforcement, have become terrifying bullies, and instead of protecting and serving the citizens, they are becoming the largest criminal organization in the country. This is especially true when it comes to the courtesy they show, and most of all during arrests, interrogations, and demonstrations. They act with great violence and a sense of being the masters of the citizenry, and abuse their authority to lie to the courts. This will hit all of us, although we do not know when, because as far as they are concerned, the police are not here to serve the citizens but rather, for the citizens to serve them and for their mission, with no accountability. They attack with no second thoughts, they assume we are all criminals, while they themselves ignore the law. Rights? Due process? Freedom of expression? Serving the citizens? Not in Israel, apparently.

We, the people, have only to wonder: when the police are the criminals, who will protect our rights?

Obama’s Cluelessness on Israel in Indonesia Speech

Tuesday, November 9th, 2010
obama indonesia speech

Obama speaks at University of Indonesia (Reuters)

I’ve just been reading coverage and an excerpted video of Obama’s Indonesia speech (full text).  I’m reminded of how brilliant he is as a strategist, theorist, and speechmaker (when before have you ever heard a U.S. president with the moxie to end a speech with the words “Asalaam Aleikum?”) and how woeful he is as a tactician.  He knows where we need to go, he has a vision of what the future should look like in the Middle East, but he hasn’t a clue how to get there.  And that will be the death of U.S. policy for the region.

Pres. Obama is actually delivering a speech to Indonesia’s Muslims in which he is attempting to sell them on the fact that he is confident that the U.S. can make headway and bring peace to the region.  This flies in the face of Israel’s announcement that it will build 800 new housing units in East Jerusalem along with 200 more on the West Bank.  Further, Bibi Netanyahu, speaking defiantly at the annual GA conference told off the Administration, saying Israel has never and would never agree to a settlement freeze in Jerusalem.  In other words, he told Obama you can take your pretty words about our building efforts as “not being helpful” and shove it.  That’s really what he said when you come right down to it.

So if you’re Barack Obama, what do you do?  Do you keep making pretty speeches in Muslim capitals or do get down in the trenches and fight for what you believe in.  Here’s what you shouldn’t say because it makes you look feeble:

“This kind of activity [settlement building] is never helpful when it comes to peace negotiations, and I’m concerned that we’re not seeing each side make the extra effort involved to get a breakthrough,” Mr. Obama said during a joint news conference here with the Indonesian president, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono. He added, “Each of these incremental steps end up breaking trust.”

Nor this:

In the Middle East, we have faced false starts and setbacks, but we have been persistent in our pursuit of peace. Israelis and Palestinians restarted direct talks, but enormous obstacles remain. There should be no illusions that peace and security will come easy. But let there be no doubt: we will spare no effort in working for the outcome that is just, and that is in the interest of all the parties involved: two states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security.

Note his language: he talks of “setbacks” and “obstacles” and “effort.”  These are the polite words of diplomacy-speak.  Not the hard-headed words of getting things done.  Bibi, in contrast, knows how to fight in the trenches.  Every Israeli prime minister does.  That’s what Israel does best.  It has no overarching vision of how to get from Point A to Point B.  In fact, it doesn’t want to get to Point B.  It wants to stay safe and warm (or so it thinks) at Point A.  It only knows how to fight to maintain the status quo and it does this brilliantly (if that’s the appropriate word).

It will take someone with a lot more moxie than Barack Obama to get a peace agreement out of the Israelis. I recall with something less than fondness the bracing enthusiasm expressed by J Street’s founder, Daniel Levy, when he told a group of us that Obama had a brilliant strategy for getting to Point B using settlements as the lever to open the door.  How naive all that looks now.  Either that, or no one in the Administration listened to Levy.

And if anyone wants to see a further symptom of the cluelessness of the current U.S. policy,  just read Bill Clinton’s time capsule tribute to Yitzhak Rabin in the NY Times.  It’s so 1993.  It reads like a love letter to an old girl friend felled by some terrible disease and you just can’t quite get her out of your mind.  If only she’d lived, you think, imagine how perfect your life would be.  Bill Clinton was, in his day a smart tactician regarding the Israel-Palestine conflict, though not smart enough.  But his day long passed.  And this op-ed reads like a blast from the past.  It’s not that what he says about Rabin is wrong.  On the contrary, he captures the man and his many contradictions quite aptly.  The problem is that the age of Rabin is long gone.  We are in a different age.  An even more deadly one than Rabin lived through.

There are no “hard-headed idealists” (as Clinton calls Rabin), only opportunists of the most shallow kind.  They don’t want peace.  They’re not willing to give up anything for peace.  They couldn’t give a s(^t about any of that.  As far as they’re concerned Obama is a wild-eyed Arab-lover and nuisance.  They waited out and exhausted every previous American president and they figure they can do the same this time as well.

Here is the money quote which makes you realize Clinton is fluttering somewhere over the rainbow in terms of seeing what is really before him:

There is a real chance to finish the work he started. The parties are talking. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has the necessary support from his people to reach an agreement. Many Israelis say they trust him to make a peace that will protect and enhance their security. Because of the terms accepted in late 2000 by Prime Minister Ehud Barak, supported in greater detail by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, and approved by President Mahmoud Abbas and other Palestinians, everyone knows what a final agreement would look like.

Clueless.  Absolutely clueless.  It makes you realize that this is the same playbook Hillary is using.  It didn’t bring a peace deal in 2000 an it won’t bring a peace deal ten years later in 2010.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE