Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for June, 2010

CENTCOM’s Blue Sky, Red Team Talks Sense About Hezbollah, Hamas

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

centcom logoMark Perry has a mini-blockbuster of a story in Foreign Policy revealing that a team of CENTCOM intelligence analysts offered a report about what U.S. military policy should be toward Hezbollah and Hamas.  The results are exceedingly pragmatic, sensible, and for that reason, controversial:

…Senior CENTCOM intelligence officers question the current U.S. policy of isolating and marginalizing the two movements. Instead, the Red Team recommends a mix of strategies that would integrate the two organizations into their respective political mainstreams.

…The…report calls for the integration of Hizballah into the Lebanese Armed Forces, and Hamas into the Palestinian security forces…The Red Team’s conclusion…is perhaps its most controversial finding: “The U.S. role of assistance to an integrated Lebanese defense force that includes Hizballah; and the continued training of Palestinian security forces in a Palestinian entity that includes Hamas in its government, would be more effective than providing assistance to entities — the government of Lebanon and Fatah — that represent only a part of the Lebanese and Palestinian populace respectively” (emphasis in the original). The report goes on to note that while Hizballah and Hamas “embrace staunch anti-Israel rejectionist policies,” the two groups are “pragmatic and opportunistic.”

I made this for use on the Hamas article of Wi...

Can U.S. policy ever come to terms with Hamas? (Wikipedia)

This is going to have the Israel lobby mavens screaming bloody murder and the Republicans crying: “You see, we told you Obama couldn’t be trusted on Israel.”  Probably in a day or two Admiral Mullen and Gen. Petraeus will be trying to get the horses back in the barn.

I think what will anger these folks is that the Red Team is only speaking common sense to anyone who knows anything about the politics of Lebanon and Palestine.  Of course, Hezbollah and Hamas, though many of their views and policies may be anathema to some living in western democracies, represent legitimate political opinion within their respective societies.  And we’ve got to stop viewing such phenomena through our own particular U.S. lens and try to understand things more in the context of the Middle East.

Here is more reason bound to give Israel apoplexy:

…The CENTCOM team directly repudiates Israel’s publicly stated view — that the two movements are incapable of change and must be confronted with force. The report says that “failing to recognize their separate grievances and objectives will result in continued failure in moderating their behavior.”

I can just see Mort Klein, Malcolm Hoenlein and Bibi foaming at the mouth and dripping with sarcasm: “Instead of fighting murderous Middle Eastern terrorists you hopeless western liberals try to “understand” them and negotiate with them.”

We should be realistic in noting that no radical shift in U.S. policy is in the offing.  But the fact that senior intelligence officers at the military HQ responsible for the Middle East region is contemplating the formerly unthinkable and has leaked such a report is significant:

“There is a lot of thinking going on in the military and particularly among intelligence officers in Tampa [the site of CENTCOM headquarters] about these groups,” acknowledged a senior CENTCOM officer familiar with the report. However, he denied that senior military leaders are actively lobbying Barack Obama’s administration to forge an opening to the two organizations. “That’s probably not in the cards just yet,” he said.

It’s that “just yet” that will have Bibi and Ehud and Gaby crapping in their shorts.

The report directly contradicted the claims of the Israeli military and intelligence regarding the nature of Hezbollah:

The Red Team downplays the argument that the Lebanese Shiite group [Hezbollah]  acts as a proxy for Iran. The report includes a quote from Hizballah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah, stating that if Lebanon and Iran’s interests ever conflicted, his organization would favor Lebanese interests. “Hizballah’s activities increasingly reflect the movement’s needs and aspirations in Lebanon, as opposed to the interests of its Iranian backers,” the report concludes. It also criticizes Israel’s August 2006 war against Hizballah as counterproductive. “Instead of exploiting Hizballah’s independent streak … Israeli actions in Lebanon may have had the reverse effect of tightening its bonds with Iran,” the authors note.

Regarding Hamas, the Red Team notes the clearest possible reasons why Israel might want to maintain the Islamist group as its national bogeyman:

…The senior intelligence experts…ignal their unease with Israel’s anti-Hamas policies, particularly the continuing Israeli siege of Gaza…[They] note that Israel’s strategy of keeping Gaza under siege also keeps “the area on the verge of a perpetual humanitarian collapse” — a policy that the intelligence report says “may be radicalizing more people, especially the young, increasing the number of potential recruits” for the organization. The report argues that an Israeli decision to lift the siege might pave the way for reconciliation between Fatah and Hamas, which would be “the best hope for mainstreaming Hamas.” The Red Team also claims that reconciliation with Fatah, when coupled with Hamas’s explicit renunciation of violence, would gain “widespread international support and deprive the Israelis of any legitimate justification to continue settlement building and delay statehood negotiations.”

This passage lays out in bright lines why Israel desperately does NOT want Palestinian reconciliation and does not want to end the siege or see Hamas moderate its positions.  It could mean the death of the settlement movement, the death of Greater Israel, and the death of the Occupation–all of which are phenomena many Israelis refuse to live without.  Not just that they believe they cannot live without them, but that if they must renounce them it would endanger the State’s existence.

There are those among Israel’s right-wing supporters who claim that Hamas is irredentist and irredeemable.  That simply isn’t true.  As a NY Times column today by two U.S. Mideast counter-terrorism experts points out:

…When we talked to Khaled Meshal, the leader of Hamas…he said that his movement could imagine a two-state “peace” (he used the term “salaam,” not just the usual “hudna”…

After reading the following passage I think I’ve discovered a few new heroes.  And who’d-a-thunk I could ever view a military intelligence officer as a hero?  But there you have it:

…The CENTCOM Red Team report has been read by outgoing CENTCOM chief Gen. David Petraeus…There’s little question the report reflects the thinking among a significant number of senior officers at CENTCOM headquarters — and among senior CENTCOM intelligence officers and analysts serving in the Middle East….A CENTCOM senior officer told me that — so far as he knows — there is, in fact, no parallel “Blue Team” report contradicting the Red Team’s conclusion. “Well, that’s not exactly right,” this senior officer added. “The Blue Team is the Obama administration.”

When it comes to the IDF I would advise a wise Israeli political leader (perhaps an extinct species) to run as far as he or she could from what the army or military intelligence advises as far as policy is concerned.  When it comes to the U.S. military I’m shocked to say I believe just the opposite.  It is the political leaders who are lost in the dark and those in CENTCOM who have the freshest and most innovative approach for resolving the conflict.

The Red Team report is also especially important in light of the groundbreaking testimony of Gen. Petraeus before Congress that the lack of resolution of the Israeli-Arab conflict drives the Muslim world away from us, foments hatred, fuels militancy, and ends up costing the lives of U.S. troops.  That’s the truth, a truth that few policymakers at the highest levels are willing to digest (yet).  Or if they are digesting it, they’re still not willing to act on the realization.  When Pres. Obama gets tough on Israel, demands an end to the Gaza siege, demands Israel accept a return to 1967 borders, that’s when the lesson will have sunk in–and not before.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tom Terrific, Fayyadist

Tuesday, June 29th, 2010
tom friedman and salam fayyad

Tom Terrific and Salam, the Real Deal

This is another installment in the amazing adventures of Tom Terrific (aka Friedman) in Palestine, wherein our hero goes slumming through the West Bank seeking economic miracles to which he can attribute the magical touch of “Prime Minister” Salam Fayyad.  Here’s one particular howler from today’s column:

…If the Palestinians can build a real economy, a professional security force and an effective, transparent government bureaucracy it will eventually become impossible for Israel to deny the Palestinians a state in the West Bank and Arab neighborhoods of East Jerusalem.

Can anyone tell me why in God’s name Israel will find it impossible to deny the Palestinians a state merely because they have built a working economy and political apparatus?

I also find it humorous when Tom describes Fayyad as if he’s a Chicago ward-heeler:

The economist-turned-politician seems more comfortable mixing with his constituents in the West Bank…

Constituents?  Forgive me, but in my high school civics course I was taught you had to be elected to have “constituents.”  Am I missing something here or is Tom perhaps missing something?  What was Fayyad ever elected to?

I swear, Tom’s tooting of Fayyad’s horn makes me swear the former’s palm is getting greased by someone.  You couldn’t pay a PR flack enough to produce such unrelenting upbeat propaganda.  And he hasn’t just done this once, he does it several times a year.  In truth, I half-wonder whether the PA is paying Tom a consulting fee of some sort.

Here’s some more Tom delusion.  He claims conditions in the West Bank are so excellent that “even some Gazans are moving there.”  Excuse me Tom, do you realize there’s a siege underway on Gaza and that no one gets in or out without Israeli approval, which is practically non-existent?  So the only people “moving” from Gaza to the West Bank are those Israel has permitted to do so.

Tom has a truly ambitious agenda for Pres. Obama’s July 6th meeting with Bibi:

The most important thing President Obama can do when he meets Israel’s prime minister, Bibi Netanyahu, on July 6 is to nudge him to begin gradually ceding control of major West Bank Palestinian cities to the Palestinian Authority…

Ever the gradualist even in the face of mounting disaster, Tom goes for the lowest common denominator.  I can think of many important things Obama should ‘nudge’ Bibi to do: end the siege, end the Occupation, enter final status talks.  But switching from Israeli to Palestinian uniforms in a few West Bank cities is not one of them.

And all of you out there who like to “dump on” Fayyad and call him “inauthentic,” Shame on You says Tom:

I am struck, though, at how much Fayyadism makes some Arabs…uncomfortable. For those Arabs who have fallen in love with the idea of Palestinians as permanent victims, forever engaged in a heroic “armed struggle” to recover Palestine and Arab dignity, Fayyad’s methodical state-building is inauthentic. Some Arabs — shamefully — dump on it…

Imagine that, Arabs actually think a guy who came to power through an aborted armed coup and was never elected by anyone to anything is inauthentic!  What will they think of next?

I swear Tom and Bibi are in cahoots on this.  The only thing Bibi is willing to concede to Palestinians is that Israel can nibble around the edges of Occupation and improve the Palestinians economy.  So what tune does Tom sing?  It’s the economy stupid.  No, in this case it’s not the economy.  It’s political power and control of land and resources.  You can’t build a state or an economy without having absolute control over such things.  And all Tom is doing is dealing in half measures.  Oh Tom, poor Tom.  You’re too little, too late.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Huge Rise in Israeli Police Wiretaps; Judges Acquiesce in 99% of Cases; 30,000 Secret Recordings of Makhoul

Tuesday, June 29th, 2010
Israel's big brother tv show

Israel's 'Big Brother' TV show

Israeli State Controller Micha Lindenstrauss released a report revealing a massive increase in the use of secret eavesdropping by police in criminal cases.  From 2004 to 2008 the number of such wiretaps increases nearly 100% from 960 to 1,800.  In 2008, police recorded 270,000 conversations (Hebrew).  In the same year, judges rejected only 16 surveillance requests and only 51 were rejected during the entire five -year period.  Walla notes that only 7% of the conversations recorded are relevant to investigations.

Ynet calls (Hebrew) Israeli judges “rubber stamps” for their overly cozy relationship with the police and prosecution.  I’ve certainly seen that in their decisions regarding national security cases which I’ve covered here over the past few months.  Not to mention the intelligence service’s slap-happy use of secret gag orders to suppress legal political activity by Israeli dissidents.

I should make clear that there are cases in which wiretaps are legitimate tools of law enforcement.  For example, I have little sympathy for powerful politicians like Avigdor Lieberman or Haim Ramon, who complain that surveillance against them is pure political harrassment.  People in high places should expect their behavior to be examined.

But Israel is a national security state, and abuses of the civil rights of the Palestinian minority and Palestinians living under Occupation seep into the texture of everyday life in Israel and the methods of policing.  Notions of privacy are quite primitive in Israel.  Ditto a sense of protections and civil rights for citizens, especially those suspected of a crime.

Among the excesses the report uncovers are requests to tap a phone line, rather than a specific individual, and applications which widen the scope of a wiretap by using the phrase “X and others;” or instead of naming a specific crime they add “and others” so that the police may go on a fishing expedition.  Many conversations were captured which dealt with personal medical issues and other extraneous matters to which the police had no right to listen.

I should note that the Lindenstrauss report deals with criminal investigations and I presume excludes wiretaps for national security purposes.  I would imagine the State would not want these studied or included in this report.

Didi Remez translated this article from Yediot which notes that the Shin Bet recorded 30,000 conversations of Ameer Makhoul in the course of its investigation.  As I wrote above, this compares with 270,000 wiretapped conversations for the entire country in 2008!

With his trial scheduled to begin on July 13th, this article reveals that the prosecution hasn’t yet shared this material with the defense.  I always thought that in a democracy a defendant was entitled to see the evidence against him before trial.  I guess that concept is either alien to Israel or honored only for defendants who aren’t Palestinians:

Some 30,000 taped recordings were made of conversations that were wiretapped in the course of the investigation of Ameer Makhoul.

…It would seem unlikely that his trial is going to [begin] shortly since the prosecutor, Attorney Hadas Rosenberg-Sheinratt, said yesterday in court that the investigation included 30,000 telephone calls that needed to be sifted through before it could be determined which were relevant to the investigation.

“At issue is an exceptionally large quantity of material,” said Attorney Rosenberg-Sheinratt. “There aren’t many cases that involve thousands of documents. The material doesn’t come from a single source.”

Judges Yosef Elron, Moshe Gilad and Avraham Elyakim asked the prosecution to turn over with the utmost haste to the defense the missing material so as to allow for the trial to move forward.

While it is highly unlikely that Micha Lindenstrauss was thinking of protecting citizens like Ameer Makhoul with his criticism of Israeli police tactics, the latter target Palestinians and Jewish activists like Ezra Nawi, Mordechai Vanunu, Tali Fahima, Anat Kamm,  and Uri Blau disproportionately, and subject them to even greater miscarriages than Israeli Jewish criminal suspects experience.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Israeli Investigation of Gaza Flotilla in Disarray, Chairman Threatens Resignation, Bibi Relents

Tuesday, June 29th, 2010
tirkel commission members

Tirkel Commission members Horev, Tirkel and Rosenne: the geriatric brigade (GPO/Getty)

After the Israeli NGO Gush Shalom filed a complaint with the Supreme Court seeking to disband the Tirkel commission investigating the Mavi Marmara disaster, the chairman, retired Supreme Court Justice Yaakov Tirkel, threatened to resign (Hebrew–and in English).  He demanded the government expand his powers and transform the commission into an official state commission with full powers to subpoena witnesses and define its own mandate.

Faced with a serious legal challenge and the potential disintegration of the investigation, the government relented and gave Tirkel what he wanted.  But it remains to be seen what this may signify in the greater scheme of things.  You remain with a commission heavily weighted toward letting the IDF off the hook for the massacre that occurred given the history of the members I’ve outlined in earlier posts here.

For proof of the expected outcome you have only to look as far as Bibi’s “mandate” to the commission when he first announced it:

The creation of this commission will confirm to the entire world that Israel acts according to law, with transparency, and full accountability.  Two central principles informed my considerations: preserving the freedom of action of the IDF and trust in the military investigation; and providing a convincing response to the responsible nations within the world community (viz. the U.S.).

Clearly, Bibi doesn’t want a true commission of inquiry like the 9/11 Commission.  He wants a convincing bit of hasbara which will give the IDF a clean bill of health and get the world off its back so it can go about its business of maintaining the siege and Occupation.

If Tirkel was a sophisticated advocate of Israel’s case he would make the case to Bibi that a commission that has full powers and exonerates the IDF will be more convincing to the world than an emasculated panel which does the same.  I still see little likelihood that the truth will come out or anyone will be held accountable for the obvious (to all but Israel) failures of this operation.

If anyone who is serious about human rights and democratic values (that leaves you out, Gerald Steinberg), you need look no further than Gush Shalom’s High Court petition to see the absolute necessity of such Israeli NGOs acting as a watchdog over the Israeli government and its machinations.

Enhanced by Zemanta

NY Times Reporter Calls Israeli Treatment of Palestinians ‘Aggression’

Monday, June 28th, 2010

In an excellent article on the rising tension between Turkey and Israel, a N.Y. Times reporter had the b(lls to call Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians “aggression.”  The entire article is very poorly edited with numerous typos and syntactic errors, including in this passage (never an editor when you need one).  But you get the drift:

However, with the twist in Turkish politics towards a religiously conservative government in 2000s and the increasing military aggression on the Palestinian community has strained this alliance, bringing two countries at the verge of major diplomatic standoffs.

Tom Friedman and Ethan Bronner–couldn’t you guys have done a better job of watchdogging Israel’s reputation in your newspaper?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Border Policeman Admits Shooting Jilani at Point Blank Range, U.S. Consulate Offers Widow Little Help

Monday, June 28th, 2010
ziad jilani

Ziad Jilani after shooting by Israel Border Police (Maan Images)

NOTE: I apologize to readers for posting such a graphic image here.  I do not normally do so.  But under the circumstances I do not want to cover this story without people seeing what really happened to Ziad Jilani.

Three weeks ago, an Israeli border police officer shot and killed Palestinian Ziad Jilani execution-style after a hit and run accident involving a squad of four police officers.  After first reporting the police version of the incident that Jilani was a terrorist attempting to kill police, the Israeli media, in the person of Amira Hass, put forward a far more credible report claiming that a border policemen approach a wounded Jilani who was lying in the street and shot him in the head from point-blank range.

The Justice Ministry has begun an internal investigation and Jilani’s body has been exhumed and an autopsy will be done.  As part of the investigation, the murder scene and entire incident were reconstructed.  During this event, the shooter admitted, according to Haaretz’s report (Hebrew), that he shot Jilani at point-blank range.  He claimed, however, that he believed Jilani was a terrorist and killed him because he feared he was wearing a suicide vest.  Further, he claimed he fired to protect the lives of innocent bystanders.

ziad and moira jilani

Ziad and Moira Jilani in happier times

There are a few problems with his account.  First, by approaching Jilani so closely he could clearly see he was NOT wearing such a vest.  Second, proper training for such an incident (and common sense) demand that an officer not approach a potential suicide bomber at close range so as not to be blown up if a detonation occurs.  In other words, only a suicidal Israeli policeman would get that close to a potential bomber (or a policeman who knew the victim was NOT a bomber).  Third, it should’ve been clear from Jilani’s two previous wounds (one in his back) that if he did have a suicide vest, these bullets would’ve detonated it.  Fourth, no border policeman would care for the lives of the Palestinians living in Wadi Joz where the killing occurred.  In fact, several residents went to Jilani’s assistance before he was killed and according to their accounts they were beaten by the police and shoved aside.

This is all a pack of lies spread like manure by the Israeli border police, one of the most brutal, homicidal of all Israel’s police and military forces.  They are always spoiling for a fight and relish them when they come their way.  It would be just like them to escalate a minor car accident into a cold-blooded murder.

The Border Police spokesperson presented a laughable response:

This incident showed all the signs of a terror attack.  We take great pains to educate our officers about the purity of arms.  It’s simply not possible that a soldier who did not sense danger would shoot someone at point-blank range.

In a far more credible statement, the lawyer representing Jilani’s surviving family told Haaretz:

This was a car accident and nothing more.  This isn’t someone who boarded a bus with a bomb and they attempted to shoot him in the head to prevent him from harming others.  Under no circumstance would it be permissible to shoot him at point-blank range.  Without any doubt, this was murder.

Jilani’s widow is an American citizen.  As such, she is entitled to the services of the U.S. consulate in East Jerusalem.  Alas, the consulate’s response has been lackadaisical and sullen at best.  After an inquiry from Jilani’s sister, a U.S. citizen living in California, Congressman Brian Bilbray wrote to the consulate.  The response by Consul Debra Towry was typical CYA bulls(&t.  She claimed falsely that a list of attorneys was offered to the family.  The truth is that the family was forced to hire its own attorney with no help whatsoever, and certainly no list proffered, from the consulate.  The consul noted in her letter to Bilbray that a consular representative attended the first legal hearing into Jilani’s death.  This is true.  But they only did so after the widow begged them to do so.  Note in the consul’s letter to Bilbray she refuses to commit to attending future hearings:

…We [will] try to attend future hearings whenever possible.

In fact, the consulate continually told the widow there was nothing they could do to help her.  This is a response that Palestinian-American U.S. citizens are used to getting from our diplomats in Israel.

After the murder, the police canvassed the neighborhood and confiscated any video footage documenting it.  That will certainly never be seen again.  However, and possibly unbeknownst to the authorities, there is footage they didn’t manage to get.  I have not seen it yet.  But I have been advised that it presents a powerful graphic and visual record of what really happened.  Rodney King anyone?  Of course, the difference between the two incidents is that in Los Angeles there was a conscience that could be troubled by the beating.  In Israel, there is no such thing.  The number of Israelis who will be shocked, scandalized or even troubled by this murder is very small.  The majority will justify it as an unfortunate necessity given the terror war Israel confronts.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Dagan Dumped, Mossad Fixer Captured in Poland, Did Israelis Mean to Capture–Rather Than Kill–Al-Mabouh?

Sunday, June 27th, 2010
meir dagan

Bibi dumps Dagan, top international spook (Nir Keidar)

Newsweek has a fascinating article about the ongoing developments in the case of the Al-Mabouh assassination.  Poland recently arrested an accused Mossad fixer when he attempted to enter the country.  His arrest was requested by Germany because of the agent’s participation in a scheme to secure a passport for one of the Mossad agents who murdered Al-Mabouh.

Israel has protested the arrest and asked Poland to return him to Israel and Germany to quash its extradition request.  It will be a test of international resolve to see whether Germany and Poland have the courage of their convictions and go forward with this process.  If they wish to honor the concept of accountability and national sovereignty which was violated by the Israeli “hit,” then they must not accede to Israeli pressure.  We’ll see if they do.

Frankly, I’m a bit surprised that the Mossad would allow agents implicated in the Dubai assassination to return to their normal hunting grounds.  Wouldn’t you think they’d keep those individuals under wraps for a time until the dust settled?  To me, this is yet another mark of the Israeli intelligence apparatus’ disconnect from reality–at least reality outside Israel.

The world doesn’t appreciate what the Mossad did in Dubai.  England expelled the agency’s station chief.  Ireland and Australia did as well.  Yet Israel somehow thinks it got a wink and a nod and that the whole thing will blow over.  I don’t think that’s the case.

I wonder whether the arrest of the agent in Poland may have something to do with Bibi Netanyahu’s decision, announced yesterday, that Meir Dagan, the Mossad’s director, will not be reappointed to his job.  I was amused by the fact that one of the candidates being bruited about is none other than Yuval Diskin, the current Shin Bet director.  It appears that beating up Israeli Palestinian citizens and criminalizing the legal political activity of Israeli Palestinian leaders stands one in good stead to become Israel’s top international spook.

The passage from this article that really pricked my ears was this:

Official and unofficial spy aficionados are still puzzled over why Israel would ruin its previously friendly relationship with authorities in a key Gulf emirate, and blow the identities of so many undercover operatives, just to eliminate an obscure Hamas operative. One theory gaining support among intelligence experts is that Mossad’s intent was to drug and kidnap Mabhouh, and then try to use him in a trade for Gilad Shalit, an Israeli soldier held hostage in Gaza by Hamas. But the Israelis, according to this theory, may have overdosed their target on knockout drops.

While a theory gaining support among anonymous intelligence experts doesn’t carry much journalistic weight, it is a suggestive one.  It does seem especially stupid for Israel to expose half its covert ops personnel and render them unusable in future in their former capacity.  Not to mention the international opprobrium that has attached to Israel for the murder, the loss of all those stations chiefs, and harm done to its relations with all the countries whose passports and citizens were abused.  Not to mention the exposure of how the agency handles financing of its international ops.

While Israel has a long and honored tradition of knocking off Hamas operatives, it also has a long tradition of kidnapping Palestinians and Lebanese to use as poker chips in negotiations for the release of Israeli prisoners.  So it’s hard to say which motivation was more likely at play in Dubai.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Seattle Conference: Gaza Humanitarian Crisis

Sunday, June 27th, 2010

Yesterday night, 200 people joined us for the conference I initiated, Gaza’s Humanitarian Crisis: the Failure of U.S. Policy. I was delighted with the turnout and the quality of the talks by Steve Niva, David Schermerhorn, and Hazim Shafi.

This event was, in a way, a sequel to an event I organized last December on the Iran nuclear crisis and the failure of U.S. and Israeli policy in that arena.

When you blog as intensively as I do about the Israeli-Arab conflict and face an especially severe crisis, you want to do something more than just write a blog post. You want to go into your community and reach people where they live; motivate them to do something on behalf of sanity, justice and human decency.

That’s why I approached Brenda Bentz of SABEEL of Puget Sound with my idea, which she graciously supported along with St. Mark’s Cathedral, which provided the venue. I am sorry to say that Seattle’s Jewish community is not yet ready to confront these issues by hosting such a panel. Though through some lobbying of my own, the JTNews sent a reporter to the event and there will be a story about it in the next issue. I understand there were four “operatives” from Stand With Us in attendance as well. Undoubtedly, they were seeking proof that we were propagating “anti-Israel” propaganda.

Below, I’m going to post my own remarks from last night. When we have video, audio, or photos available, I’ll upload that as well:

Israel Under Siege–Enforces Consensus, Jettisons Democracy

I have the unenviable task of telling you tonight about the state of the State of Israel.  In short, it’s not good.  I’ve been following Israeli politics since I was a teenager in 1967 and I don’t think I’ve ever felt more alarmed and depressed about what is happening within Israel.

We all knew when Bibi Netanyahu became prime minister that we were in for a far-right government.  But sad to say I think we were spoiled by the more centrist governments that preceded them.  We thought that since both Ariel Sharon and Ehud Olmert were former Likud political leaders that Bibi would perhaps be a slightly more conservative version.

But Bibi has been a revelation, and not a good one.  Under his rule, the Israeli peace and human rights community have come under fire as never before.  The leader of the New Israel Fund, a relatively tame advocate of Israeli civil society and democracy, was vilified in all the major Israeli newspapers in an ad displaying a caricature of her with a rhino horn sprouting from her forehead.  It was an ugly display worthy of some of the lowest propaganda of the Nazi anti-Semitic publication, Der Shturmer.

A few months ago, Uri Blau, an Israeli journalist writing for Haaretz was forced into exile because he received secret documents from an IDF soldier named Anat Kamm.  These memos documented major military violations of an Israeli Supreme Court ruling barring targeted killings of Palestinian militants who could be apprehended non-violently.  Not only did the Israeli intelligence service, Shabak, threaten to prosecute Uri Blau, Haaretz’s military correspondent now residing in London, they did prosecute Kamm, threatening her with a life sentence.  Essentially, this woman is an Israeli Daniel Ellsberg, yet she faces calls from the Israeli far-right for hanging.

An Israeli Palestinian Knesset member, Haneen Zoabi, joined the Gaza flotilla and sailed on the ill-fated Mavi Marmara.  If she’d been a regular Israeli citizen she could’ve been arrested and imprisoned for her action.  Luckily for her, she had parliamentary immunity.  When she returned to the Knesset, right-wing MKs called her a traitor and killer.  She arose to defend herself and all hell broke loose.  A Jewish female Knesset member lunged at her and would’ve taken her down if she hadn’t been restrained by Knesset security.  Everyone knows how fractious and dysfunctional the Israeli parliament can be.  Many of us have seen the shouting matches and bad behavior.  But this was a different order of magnitude.  Even an Israeli TV newscaster called it a “near-lynching.”

The Israeli security apparatus has gone to war against Israeli Palestinian political leaders.  This goes back to an announcement in 2007 by Yuval Diskin, Shin Bet chief, that he planned to wage all-out combat against Palestinian nationalists.  He viewed even legal political activities that advanced views that were detrimental to the notion that Israel was solely a Jewish state, as anathema.  He made clear as part of this crusade, he would pull out all the stops.  And he has done so.

In the past month, the Shin Bet arrested the director of an Israeli Palestinian NGO named Ameer Makhoul.  They came to his Haifa apartment in the dead of night, ransacked it, and confiscated all the electronic equipment in it, including cell phones and computers belonging to his teenage daughters.  They slapped a gag order on his arrest.  No Israeli reporter could say what had happened to Makhoul.  He essentially disappeared into the maw of the secret police.

One of my jobs as a blogger is to break such gag orders and I’m pleased to say that with the help of Israeli sources I did.  After my reporting, we knew who had been arrested.  We found out about the preposterous charges against him, that he had consorted with known Hezbollah agents and offered to spy against his country.

The identity of the alleged Hezbollah agent was also under gag order.  But I broke that too and revealed that Hassan Jaja was so dangerous that he was a landscape designer and nurseryman in Amman who ran an Arab environmental NGO.

Despite the ludicrousness of the charges, this didn’t stop the Shin Bet from torturing Makhoul during the three weeks when they held him incommunicado, preventing access to his lawyers or family.  He was deprived of sleep, tied to a chair that was bolted to the floor and forced to confirm a narrative that his interrogators dictated to him.  It reminds me of a Teheran show trial.

This is how low Israel has gone.  In an effort to combat the international campaign to hold Israel accountable for its actions its actions in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead, the nation has inflicted upon itself and the rest of the world a sort of pathological madness.

It called Judge Richard Goldstone, author of the UN report on the war, a traitor to his people.  Accused him of a blood libel against Israel.  Accused him of being a moser, a Jew who during the Holocaust ferreted out Jews in hiding and betrayed them to the Gestapo.  They tarnished Goldstone’s record as a South African anti-apartheid judge by comparing him to Josef Mengele.

Some of us attended the last SABEEL conference held here in this Cathedral and heard Israeli Professor Neve Gordon’s address.  He, several months ago, electrified observers of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by publicly expressing his support for the global BDS movement in the Los Angeles Times and The Guardian.  For this, he too was excoriated.  The president of Ben Gurion University where he teaches, claimed he had crossed a red line that no professor had a right to cross, doing damage to the State.  Israelis across the political spectrum attempted to make the case that academic freedom did not entitle someone to speak ill of Israel or Zionism.  They suggested not so subtly Gordon might be happier living elsewhere (a fate that befell Ilan Pappe and Tanya Reinhardt).

Ben Gurion’s President Carmi essentially said she would fire Gordon if she could.  But of course she couldn’t since there is such a thing as academic freedom still honored in Israel.

Add to this, the fact that a British trustee of Ben Gurion told a Jewish newspaper that Prof. David Newman, a colleague of Gordon’s should die because he criticized Israeli policy in a British TV documentary.  140 faculty members protested to the president about the trustee’s irresponsible statement and she promptly ignored them.

Speaking of dying, last week Neve Gordon received a bona fide death threat from an anonymous source, calling him a traitor and warning him that the writer would come to the campus and kill him.  While Pres. Carmi denounced the act, she also in effect blamed Gordon for bringing it on himself by his “irresponsible” behavior.

In light of the repression and paranoia I’ve outlined above, it isn’t surprising that the IDF perpetrated the debacle it did on the Mavi Marmara.  I don’t know exactly what happened.  But in the most charitable interpretation I imagine that after it faced resistance from some passengers and the belief among the assault team that some members were captured, I believe there was a general breakdown in unit discipline and chaos ensued.  While I don’t believe the IDF planned to execute anyone and engage in cold blooded murder, the stage was certainly set by spokespeople who threatened that Israel was prepared to use force to prevent the ships from reaching Gaza.

Now, a word on the Israeli investigation of this disaster.  In short, it too is a disaster.  Netanyahu has appointed three Israelis and two foreign “observers.”  The panel is chaired by Yaakov Tirkel, a 75 year old retired Supreme Court justice who has said publicly that he holds the honor of the IDF above “the enemy.”  The justice is known for siding with the government on national security cases.  Another Israeli panelist is Amos Horev, an 86 year-old retired general who, in 1943, was accused of castrating a Palestinian villager who sexually harassed a Jewish woman.  The third member is Shabtai Rosenne, a 94 year-old former diplomat who counseled the Israeli prime minister after the notorious Kibya massacre orchestrated by Ariel Sharon to lie to the world by claiming that Israeli civilians perpetrated the killings and not the army.  An Israeli newspaper photographed this poor man at his home wearing the type of summer shorty pajamas worn by elderly folks and tended by his Filipino caretaker.  I call this the geriatric commission.  They should hold the sessions in a retirement home rather than a government conference room.

One of the foreign observers, Lord David Trimble, just co-founded a European pro-Israel advocacy organization whose mission is to oppose “delegitimization” of Israel within Europe.  The second observer is a former judge in the Canadian army.

In short, the fix is in.  No one really believes this body will satisfy anyone except Israel.  Haaretz has editorialized to that effect.  Ban Ki Moon has warned the commission isn’t credible.  We need a true international investigation.  Nothing less will suffice.

Now, I’d like to turn to U.S. policy.  As an American Jew and supporter of Israeli-Palestinian peace, I had high hopes of Barack Obama.  I still do.  But I’ve become doubtful that any of those hopes will ever be realized.

When faced with the intransigence of the Israeli government, whether the settlement freeze, the Goldstone Report or the Gaza flotilla massacre, the operative mode seems to be keeping things quiet and under control.  There never seems to be backbone when it’s called for.

When the Goldstone Report was first issued, the U.S. attempted to block it and threatened a Security Council veto if it was brought up there.  When Turkey and the nations of the world demanded an international investigation of the Mavi Marmara murders, the U.S. said an Israeli investigation would do.  When things got hot and heavy in the aftermath of the killings and pressure mounted to end the Gaza siege, the Obama administration made do with merely easing the suffering rather than ending it completely.

This is an administration satisfied with half measures.  There are times when half-measures may work to quiet a crisis if it isn’t terribly severe.  But we’re way past severe when it comes to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.  The situation calls for backbone, for perseverance, for fortitude.  Instead we get waffling, and zig-zagging.

Finally, I want to note that today is the fourth anniversary of the capture of IDF soldier Gilad Shalit by Palestinian militants.  During that time, there have been negotiations between Israel and Hamas over his fate.  Essentially, the latter demanded the release of several hundred jailed Palestinians.  Israel balked.  While everything about the case is veiled in a fog, from what I’ve read the sides were close to agreement a number of times.  But negotiations foundered over which detainees would be released and how many.  Israel balked when faced with the prospect of releasing those with blood on their hands.

I want Gilad Shalit to return to the bosom of his family.   But I also want Israel to recognize Hamas and end its siege.  I want the residents of Sderot to be safe from Qassam rockets.  But I also want the residents of Gaza to be free from paralyzing fear and anticipation of the next war.

There is a way out of this mess.  The 2002 Saudi initiative proposed Arab acceptance of Israeli in return for a withdrawal to near-1967 borders.  Israel has rejected this peace plan, which is still on the table.  There is only one way to save Israel: to make peace.  Everyone knows the parameters of the future settlement.  The only question is how many will have to die before Israel comes to its senses and agrees to it.  To quote a Jewish saying: “may it happen speedily and in our day.”

Enhanced by Zemanta
Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE