Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for January, 2009

Settlement is Theft, Secret IDF Report Confirms

Saturday, January 31st, 2009
Israeli settlements (dark brown indicates private Palestinian land--source: Peace Now)

Israeli settlements (dark brown indicates private Palestinian land--source: Peace Now)

There’s an old anarchist slogan: “property is theft.” In Israel this is true of the settlements.

Haaretz once again proves why it’s Israel’s newspaper of record by reporting a blockbuster story of a secret Defense ministry report documenting that the settlements are based on a tissue of lies and theft:

Just four years ago, the defense establishment decided to carry out a seemingly elementary task: establish a comprehensive database on the settlements. Brigadier General (res.) Baruch Spiegel, aide to then defense minister Shaul Mofaz, was put in charge of the project. For over two years, Spiegel and his staff, who all signed a special confidentiality agreement, went about systematically collecting data, primarily from the Civil Administration.

One of the main reasons for this effort was the need to have credible and accessible information at the ready to contend with legal actions brought by Palestinian residents, human rights organizations and leftist movements challenging the legality of construction in the settlements and the use of private lands to establish or expand them. The painstakingly amassed data was labeled political dynamite…

…In the vast majority of the settlements – about 75 percent – construction, sometimes on a large scale, has been carried out without the appropriate permits or contrary to the permits that were issued. The database also shows that, in more than 30 settlements, extensive construction of buildings and infrastructure (roads, schools, synagogues, yeshivas and even police stations) has been carried out on private lands belonging to Palestinian West Bank residents.

A 2006 Peace Now report documents that a large percentage of Israeli settlements are built on such Palestinian land (the total acreage was something like 33% or more if I recall correctly). In the same sense that the United States was built and based upon the theft of Native American land, we similarly see that settlements could not exist without the theft of Palestinian land. And just as the U.S. has had to negotiate agreements with various tribes to compensate them for such theft, Israel will have to do the same. It will eventually either have to return the land or compensate the rightful owners if any semblance of justice is to be done. There certainly can be no legitimate resolution of the conflict that doesn’t address this deep injustice.

The carefully assembled journalistic indictment clarifies that the report not only documents the shady dealings of the illegal outposts, which one might expect–but refers as well to the most well-established settlements:

The data, it should be stressed…refers [to those at]…the very heart of the settlement enterprise. Among them are veteran ideological settlements like Alon Shvut (established in 1970)…Ofra (established in 1975)…and Beit El (established in 1977, population 5,308, including Hagai Ben-Artzi, brother of Sara Netanyahu). Also included are large settlements founded primarily for economic motives, such as the city of Modi’in Illit (established in 1990 and now home to 36,282 people), or Givat Ze’ev outside Jerusalem (founded in 1983, population 11,139), and smaller settlements such as Nokdim near Herodion (established in 1982, population 851, including MK Avigdor Lieberman).

The report puts the lie to claims by the Israeli foreign ministry that settlements conform fully to international law and it also confirms the government’s willing collusion in the charade:

…The Foreign Ministry Web site…states: “Israel’s actions relating to the use and allocation of land under its administration are all taken with strict regard to the rules and norms of international law – Israel does not requisition private land for the establishment of settlements.” Since in many of the settlements, it was the government itself, primarily through the Ministry of Construction and Housing, that was responsible for construction, and since many of the building violations involve infrastructure, roads, public buildings and so on, the official data also demonstrate government responsibility for the unrestrained planning and lack of enforcement of regulations in the territories.

I fear that despite the damning nature of this report and others like it, little will change within Israel with regard to the settlements. Israelis do not choose to know or understand the facts. Reports like this are distant from the average Israeli’s daily concerns.

The settlements are like those blood sucking vampire bats which remove just enough blood from their victims so as not to kill them, but too much to do much good for their health. Or to put it another way, settlements are the Count Dracula of Israeli society. They suck up the lifeblood and nothing can kill them except a stake through the heart. And which Israeli leader has the courage to face the deadly Count and plunge the dagger?

Thanks to Kung Fu Jew for making me aware of the significance of this report.  He’s written about it as well at Jewschool.

Duking it Out in Davos: Erdogan v. Peres

Friday, January 30th, 2009
Turkish prime minister Erdogan walks out of Davos forum after Peres tongue-lashing

Turkish prime minister Erdogan walks out of Davos forum after Peres tongue-lashing

Shimon Peres put on a display of fireworks, venom and histrionics–in his talk at Davos (60 minute video) about the Gaza war–that was startling. He shouted, wagged his finger, hectored, berated. It was astonishing. His antagonist was primarily the Turkish prime minister Erdogan, who took Israel’s prime minister Olmert to task for wasting an opportunity to make peace with Syria under Turkish auspices during a meeting only four days before the Gaza attack.  In fact one wonders why Olermt would go forward with such a meeting when he knew what the IDF had in store for Gaza.  It really was the ultimate insult for his Turkish hosts.  Of course, if you read the Israeli rightist press like the Jerusalem Post you’ll find nothing but vitriol for Turkey, which is viewed as the one which betrayed Israel.  But the right never wanted negotiations with Syria anyway.


Erdogan rather eloquently called for Israel to embrace negotiation rather than violence to achieve its aims. While he admitted that some find Hamas distasteful, he reminded his listeners that they were elected fair and square by Palestinians to represent them. Clearly, the Turkish leader felt burned by the investment of time and capital in attempting to bridge the differences between Israel and Syria and achieve a peace agreement. He saw the Gaza operation as a personal affront to these diplomatic efforts. It is for this reason that Turkey’s reaction to Gaza has been so harsh and unyielding. You can’t really blame him.

From his point of view, Turkey held out an opportunity for Israel to achieve peace with Syria through negotiations rather than the gun. And what was Israel’s response? To spurn it by letting loose the dogs of war in Gaza.

When it came time to Peres to speak he was given 25 minutes to meander (while the previous speakers had been given 10 minutes each). The Israeli president unleashed a harsh, unyielding rant that was full of strange statements, truncated arguments and meandering rhetoric. Clearly, he is feeling the effects of his age as his remarks bordered on the incoherent at times. But what was most evident was the choleric tone.

Here are a few of the stranger statements: he claimed that Israel could not accept the Saudi 2002 initiative because “there was a small problem of Iran” which wishes to rule the Middle East. Peres also claimed that Hamas did not win a democratic election. Rather Mahmoud Abbas DID win an election as president of the Palestinians. Peres also claimed there is no humanitarian crisis in Gaza; that Israel supplies all the water, fuel and electricity that Gaza needs; and that if there is a problem he would personally intervene to correct it.

Israel’s president touted the work of his Peres Center, for bringing 5,500 Palestinian children to Israeli hospitals to be “cured” of their illnesses. He bragged that every Israeli hospital has Arab doctors who can communicate with these patients.  The level of cultural condesenscion and nobless oblige in these remarks was rather astonishing.

Peres weirdly asked why Hamas wouldn’t turn to the path of negotiation, and then promptly said that Israel could never negotiate with a Palestinian government that included terrorist thugs like Hamas.

He claimed that Israel never broke a ceasefire, never fired unless fired upon.  After Erdogan complained that his car had been delayed 30 minutes at the Israeli border crossing into the West Bank, Peres had the temerity to claim it happened because such cars have been known to be packed with dynamite.  Can you imagine Israel’s president justifying such a severe diplomatic breach by claiming that the car of a sovereign head of state (AND Israeli ally) might’ve been packed with dynamite?  I’m scratching my head over that one.  Is this nuttery supposed to be doing Israel a favor?

It’s like he’s been living in an cocoon and not been reading the world’s newspaper or television news programs to see what his own troops have inflicted on the Gazans.  In fact, he reminds me a bit of an embalmed figure the Israelis release from his state of suspended animation every few weeks so he can go before the world community and convey his truculent message, after which they put him back in his cocoon where he can return to hibernation.  This was a sad day for Israel.

If I was a bit less charitable I might say that Peres’ extraordinary performance is emblematic of Israel’s own lagging performance on the world stage. Just as Israel sputters with rage and does such a poor job of pursuing its interets and persuading the world of its good intentions–so Shimon Peres today represented Israel in the most shabby and loud-mouthed fashion. While I have disliked and disagreed with Peres’ political views for almost ten years now, this was truly his nadir, and along with it, Israel’s.

After Peres completed his tirade, Erdogan asked for time to rebut him.  Washington Post journalist and moderator, David Ignatius cut him off after 2 minutes or so and brought the proceedings to an end.  Erdogan arose angrily and announced that it would be his last visit to Davos.  Personally, I think the Davos organizers have only themselves to blame.  They created a panel of talking heads without allowing any interaction with the audience.  There wasn’t even an opportunity for the speakers to directly address each other through questions and give and take.  It was a recipe for pontification and confrontation.

By the way, I found the remarks of Amr Moussa, the Arab League secrary to be the most cogent, thoughtful and eloquent.  I urge you to listen to them.  If there were only people of good will and sharp thinking like him on both sides, the conflict could easily be resolved.

Erdogan’s talk begins at about the 7 minute mark.  Peres begins at about the 31 minute mark.  Erdogan’s walkout occurs at about the 1:00 mark.  Though it’s a long video, it’s quite interesting and worth watching if nothing else for the rare opportunity to see powerful Middle East leaders exploding in rage and fireworks.

UPDATE: Did Peres apologize with his tail between his legs or not?

Peres: Such things happen between friends. I am very sorry for today’s incident. Firstly, my respect towards the Turkish republic and you as prime minister has never changed.

Erdogan: Firstly, of course. There is no doubt that such arguments can happen between friends. But nobody can even speak to a tribe leader so loudly and in front of the international community, and not to the leader of the Republic of Turkey.

Peres: I raised my voice. In fact my friends tell me that I have a quite voice. This has nothing to do with my relationship with the prime minister of the Republic of Turkey. I am very sorry for what happened today.

Erdogan: I heard that you are going to hold a press conference.

Peres: …Tomorrow.

Erdogan: If you express these sincere feelings, which I believe you will, in tomorrow’s press conference, I assume this problem will be mostly overcome.

Peres: Of course I will publicly express these remarks.

Needless to say, Israeli leaders don’t feel any compunction about being true to their word.  There was no press conference and further, Peres now denies apologizing.  In addition, he now claims the only purpose of the call was to ensure the “situation doesn’t deteriorate further.”  Does he think that denying he apologized after insulting Turkey’s prime minister will IMPROVE the situation?

All this proves that Israeli machismo is more important than salvaging a relationship with the only Muslim nation which recognizes Israel and facilitates peace negotiations with one of its major Arab adversaries.  Peace is less important than saving face before the Israeli public.  Which is why Turkey felt compelled to distribute a transcript of the phone call via its government news service.

Noa Calls for Israel to Rid Gaza of Hamas ‘Cancer’

Tuesday, January 27th, 2009

I don’t know what demon possessed Ahinoam Nini’s brain when she wrote a long passionate letter to Palestinians during the Gaza war in which she railed against Hamas and called, in the most vehement terms, for the IDF to uproot it.

First a word of background: Noa is one of Israel’s premiere performers with a voice of honey.  She is known for her pro-peace views and performs regularly with Israeli Arab performers and singers like Cheb  Khaled (with whom she sang a breathtaking cover of Imagine featured here).  She is to perform along with Mira Awad (also previously profiled here), one of Israel’s most prominent female vocalists, in the Eurovision Song Contest, as Israel’s entry.

But a strange thing happened to Noa on the way to Eurovision.  While sunk in a funk during the Gaza invasion, she decided to pen her plaint for peace and to tell the world what was wrong with Hamas and its Palestinian supporters.  While there is much in her blog entry that is laudable and true, the entire balance is skewed heavily against Hamas and shows such a fundamental misunderstanding about what really happened in Gaza and why that I’m left dumbfounded that she could’ve gotten things so utterly wrong:

I have often spoken out against fanaticism in my country, for I find it repulsive and unbearable. In government, in settlements, in synagogues, I am passionately against it. I have risked my career and my well-being for this belief.

Now I see the ugly head of fanaticism, I see it large and horrid, I see its black eyes and spine-chilling smile, I see blood on its hands and I know one of its many names: Hamas.

You know this too, my brothers. You know this ugly monster. You know it is raping your women and raping the minds of your children. You know it is educating to hatred and death.  You know it is chauvinistic and violent, greedy and selfish, it feeds on your blood and screams out Allah’s name on vain, it hides like a thief, uses the innocent as human shields, uses your mosques as arsenals, lies and cheats, uses YOU, tortures you, holds you hostage!!

I know this is true my brothers!! I know YOU know the truth!! And I know you cannot say it for fear of life so I will say it for you!! I fear nothing!! I am privileged to live in a democracy where women are not objects but presidents, where a singer can say and do as she pleases! I know you do not have this privilege (yet…but you will, inshallah, you will…)

I know you are SICK of being held hostage by this demon, this ugly beast, not in Gaza, not in Iran or Iraq or Afghanistan, not anywhere!!! You are a people destined to flourish in peace! Your majestic history is overflowing with creativity, literature science and music, endless contributions to humanity, not crippling, torturing fanaticism, yelling Jihad and Shahid!

I see you sometimes, out in the streets, demonstrating with the monsters, yelling ‘death to the Jews, death to Israel!! But I don’t believe you! I know where your heart is! It is just where mine is, with my children, with the earth, with the heavens, with music, with HOPE!! You want nothing of this but you have no choice! I see through your veil of fear my brothers, through your burka! I embrace your hopes for they are mine!

My country has made many many mistakes over the years, I have watched it miss so many opportunities, and as a citizen of this country I am the first to admit it and criticize its foolery. I demonstrate, I vote, I speak out, I sing loud and clear.

But, now, today, I know that deep in your hearts YOU WISH for the demise of this beast called Hamas who has terrorized and murdered you, who has turned Gaza into a trash heap of poverty, disease and misery. Who in the name of “allah” has sacrificed you on the bloody alter of pride and greed.

My brothers, I cry for you. I cry for us too, yes, I cry for my fellow countrymen suffering the bombs in the south and north and everywhere, I cry for the kidnapped soldiers and the murdered ones, for their bereft families, for the innocence lost forever, but I cry especially painfully for you for I know your suffering, I feel you, I feel you!!

I can only wish for you that Israel will do the job we all know needs to be done, and finally RID YOU of this cancer, this virus, this monster called fanaticism, today, called Hamas. And that these killers will find what little compassion may still exist in their hearts and STOP using you and your children as human shields for their cowardice and crimes.

And then… then, maybe, Inshallah, we will again have an opportunity… we will again pick up our broken bodies and souls and walk slowly towards each other, reach out a tired hand, look into eyes filled with tears and with a choked voice say: “Shalom. Salam. Enough. Enough my brother ….

The level of sheer condescension and cultural superiority represented by this statement is mind-boggling.  It shows that even those who speak out of heart-felt passion and concern can sometimes make fools of themselves.  Passion must be informed by judgment and analysis.  This Noa lacks.  She blames Hamas for all the evils of Palestinian society.  She claims she is critical of her own goverment and society, but whispers snot a word about WHY there is poverty, suffering and misery in Gaza.  What about the siege?  Does she think that Hamas prefers Gaza to not have food, water, power, medicine or commerce?  Where is the moral intelligence that we so often hear in her music?  How did her judgment entirely desert her?

I am not claiming that Hamas are angels.  I would not vote for Hamas if I were a Palestinian.  But how can Noa deign to tell the Palestinians what they are thinking in their hearts about Hamas?  Is this the ultimate chutzpah or what?

Noa and Awad were scheduled to perform together at a Tel Aviv concert to benefit Gaza civilians but Israeli Arab and Jewish intellectuals excoriated Noa for her diatribe and she withdrew from the concert (here is Israeli director, Udi Aloni’s eloquent rejoinder).  And rightly so.  What right does she have to attempt to ease the suffering of those civilians through the concert, when she defended the very military operation by her own army which caused it?

This is one of those times when you scratch your head and say of someone you know to be more intelligent than that: what were they thinking?  And by the way, Noa, your cover with Awad of We Can Work It Out is second-rate.  The song doesn’t begin to delve into the depths of the suffering of this conflict as Imagine does.

There is some kind of moral disconnect that happens with Israeli liberals.  They feel opposing their own government’s policies places them on such a high moral plane that they can start telling Palestinians how they should live their lives.  It’s offensive and distasteful.  Whatever happened to a bit of humility and introspection?

Thanks to reader Peter Drubetskoy for the original tip and finding the following subsequent post that Noa wrote after she was drubbed by her fans for her original comments:

about a week ago i posted a letter to my palestinian brothers everywhere.

in my original letter, i was very harsh in my words regarding Hamas. I was pointing a finger at them clearly, this came from my gut, from the deepest, most hurting place in my heart. The reason i did that, is that the horrible stories i have heard about Hamas from my Palestinian friends who used to live in Gaza (and escaped, barely, from death by Hamas), plus the videos on youtube of hamas using children as a human shield, or throwing fatach personnel blindfolded and cuffed from the roof of a building, plus endless testimonies from Palestinians…

All of this lead me to a very harsh reaction, praying the Palestinian people would finally be released from the clutches of this horror. I have not changed my mind about atrocities, cruelty and killing, but i know that pointing fingers at names and symbols is not the solution.

…I am willing to change my mind at any moment about anyone who is willing to stand up for co-existence, freedom and mutual respect and recognition. I am willing to apologize to anyone who feels unjustly offended. I can even push aside past atrocities…

…When we in Israel sum up the evidence including the rhetoric, the 8 years of rockets, the Iran and Hezbollah threats we react in proportion to a nightmare, not just to this or that incident. I believe the same thing is true for the subjective feeling of the Palestinians and the whole Muslim world. Therefore it is their responsibility to communicate through dialog their fears to us, Israelis, so that we can take it upon ourselves to melt this iceberg of suspicion just as we want them to reassure us of their peaceful and positive intensions and melt down our fears too.

My opinion is and was always the same: i am against violence in all it forms. I am against fanaticism in all its forms. I am against finger pointing and blaming as there is no end to it and i am totally against a unilateral black and white approach to anything. I think we all have the responsibility to look the truth in the face: we all brought this catastrophe upon ourselves and now it is our responsibility to do what we can to change it! That means…exchanging negative, violent rhetoric…with a rhetoric of peace, acceptance, dialogue and joint recognition (like the Geneva initiative which i totally support). This is our only hope.

The decision i made together with Mira Awad to go to the Eurovision contest with a message of peace is part of this theory: build, give a personal example of dialogue and co-existence, not the opposite

This is better. But why did it take her three attempts (there is a revised version of her first post which I’ve omitted) to get here? Call me a disappointed fan.  And I feel badly for Awad, who is not only a stunning woman, but a talented actress and singer who has achieved much despite the racism that would hinder any Israeli Arab performer’s career.  She has been placed in an untenable situation by Noa’s outburst.

IDF Chief Rabbi Teaches Torah to Terrorists, Advises Soldiers to Show Palestinian Civilians ‘No Mercy’

Tuesday, January 27th, 2009

Haaretz brings word of two chilling stories concerning the IDF’s chief rabbi and his sympathies for the extreme nationalist views of the settler movement.  The first recounts the religious fervor which the army’s religious cadre attempted to instill in the troops:

…The army rabbinate’s publications [offered to soldiers] during the fighting reflects the tone of nationalist propaganda that steps blatantly into politics, sounds racist and can be interpreted as a call to challenge international law when it comes to dealing with enemy civilians.

Haaretz has received some of the publications through Breaking the Silence…Other material was provided by officers and men who received it during Operation Cast Lead. Following are quotations from this material:

“[There is] a biblical ban on surrendering a single millimeter of it [the Land of Israel] to gentiles, though all sorts of impure distortions and foolishness of autonomy, enclaves and other national weaknesses. We will not abandon it to the hands of another nation, not a finger, not a nail of it.”…The text is from “Books of Rabbi Shlomo Aviner,” who heads the Ateret Cohanim yeshiva in the Muslim quarter of the Old City in Jerusalem.

The following questions are posed in one publication: “Is it possible to compare today’s Palestinians to the Philistines of the past? And if so, is it possible to apply lessons today from the military tactics of Samson and David?” Rabbi Aviner…says…: “A comparison is possible because the Philistines of the past were not natives and had invaded from a foreign land … They invaded the Land of Israel, a land that did not belong to them and claimed political ownership over our country … Today the problem is the same. The Palestinians claim they deserve a state here, when in reality there was never a Palestinian or Arab state within the borders of our country. Moreover, most of them are new and came here close to the time of the War of Independence.”

The IDF rabbinate…describes the appropriate code of conduct in the field: “When you show mercy to a cruel enemy, you are being cruel to pure and honest soldiers. This is terribly immoral. These are not games at the amusement park where sportsmanship teaches one to make concessions. This is a war on murderers. ‘A la guerre comme a la guerre.’”

This view is eaches also echoed in publications signed by Rabbis Chen Halamish and Yuval Freund on Jewish consciousness. Freund argues that “our enemies took advantage of the broad and merciful Israeli heart” and warns that “we will show no mercy on the cruel.”

Given the IDF’s behavior in Lebanon and Gaza, I no longer believe we can call the IDF the people’s army. It is the settler’s army, inspired largely by settler ideas. With children of the secular increasingly seeking ways to avoid the army, this leaves the ranks populated much more prevalently by the Orthodox, which tends to be a far more nationalist cohort.

This to an extent explains the increasing willingness to resort to cruel tactics that might never have been approved by an army run by Yizhak Rabin during the 1967 War when he was chief of staff.

Haaretz also reports that the rabbinate has permitted other literature on army bases which espouses views of the extreme settler movement:

One such flyer is attributed to [students of a rabbi who praised] Baruch Goldstein, who massacred unarmed Palestinians in Hebron. It calls on “soldiers of Israel to spare your lives and the lives of your friends and not to show concern for a population that surrounds us and harms us. We call on you … to function according to the law ‘kill the one who comes to kill you.’ As for the population, it is not innocent … We call on you to ignore any strange doctrines and orders that confuse the logical way of fighting the enemy.”

In other words, the above document calls on the IDF to deliberately treat Palestinians civilians as if they were the same as combatants. This is a deliberate violation of the laws of war. One wonders why the IDF would countenance such material being offered to its soldiers.

The second article describes religious counseling that the chief rabbi provided for settler extremists convicted of plotting bomb attacks against Palestinian civilians, including a girl’s school:

The chief rabbi of the Israel Defense Forces has in the past year been visiting prisoners associated with extreme right-wing groups, some of whom are serving jail sentences for planning or helping to carry out terrorist attacks against Arabs…

Brig. Gen. Rabbi Avichai Ronski…has met with the prisoners to teach them about Judaism. The IDF Spokesman’s Office responded to a query about the visits by saying that the encounters were a private initiative of Ronski.

“The initiative did not involve a formal IDF visit and was not instigated by the IDF,” the spokesperson said.

The Israel Prisons Service, when queried, responded: “We have received requests by the chief IDF rabbi to meet with prisoners, which we vetted and approved, in part.”  

Interesting that the IDF attempts to dissociate itself from the meetings by claiming they were arranged at the rabbi’s initiative. Yet the IDF approved the visits which, in effect, gives the army’s heksher for them. This is a case of wanting to have your cake and eat it too. The army doesn’t want to appear to be favoring terrorists, yet it allows its own chief rabbi to shower them with special attention. If this isn’t the height of hypocrisy…

Here’s what a few of those nice Jewish boys were convicted of attempting:

The Bat Ayin group was exposed in April 2002, when police arrested two of its members, Shlomo Dvir and Yarden Morag, as they were laying a large explosive device near a Palestinian school for girls in A-Tur in East Jerusalem.

As far as I’m concerned, the chief rabbi and army that employs him are hopelessly morally compromised by such horrific behavior. While they’re at it, why doesn’t Ronski schedule regular counseling sessions with Yigal Amir in which he can teach him the proper Jewish way of shooting a sitting prime minister. Maybe he can find suitable verses in the Tanach or Talmud to comfort Amir as he serves his life sentence.

Finally, this passage didn’t surprise me very much. I’m never surprised that a group supported by Lev Leviev and doing the settler’s bidding plays such an integral part of the chief rabbi’s propaganda efforts:

The programs – run in close coordination with the Elad right-wing…organization, dedicated to expanding Jewish settlement in East Jerusalem – have expanded greatly under Ronski’s command.

Is this the type of Judaism we as Jews support?  How can Israel or the IDF expect Diaspora Jews to fall into line with such repugnant, racist views?  I’m not even asking how Israelis themselves can countenance this since for some reason they don’t raise a hue and cry over it.  But such noxious attitudes will drive an ever deepening wedge between Israel and Diaspora.  Surveys suggest a growing sense of alienation of young Jews toward Israel.  Apparently, this doesn’t concern Israel’s political leaders a whit.  When there is a split between perceived national interest and good relations with the Diaspora, the former always trumps the latter.

I worry that there may come a time when support for Israel from us will be essential for its survival.  Then, there may not be enough support to secure for Israel what it needs.  And this will be the fault of decades of Israel thumbing its nose at the concerns and interests of Diaspora Jews, not to mention debasing its own moral values.

Israel’s War Against the Palestinians Hurts Jews Too

Monday, January 26th, 2009

We’re not really conditioned to think about how Israel’s actions impact the world’s perceptions of not just Israel, but Diaspora Jews as well. But we should. Aziz Poonawalla, a Pakistani-American Muslim, has written an interesting blog post on the impact that Gaza has had on his Muslim friends. It’s worth considering:

I am frustrated, because in the past few weeks I’ve received various email forwards from many people I respect that are laden with anger and frustration at Israel’s campaign of collective punishment in Gaza. These are intelligent, tolerant people – mostly muslim, but also christian, hindu and atheist – who have never been tainted by anti-Semitism in the past. But the emails are vicious and invoke Hitler and draw the usual Nazi comparisons. One of the most upsetting is an email which pairs images from Nazi occupation of Poland with images from Gaza and the West Bank, which makes a visceral equivalence that is virtually impossible to reason against.

Gaza has been radicalizing public opinion against Israel worldwide. It’s sad to see how anti-Semitism flourishes and takes root in the space created by the anger and helplessness. Israel may claim to have won the tactical battle but it has suffered a massive, self-inflicted, strategic defeat. And so too have the Jewish people as a whole.

It bears repeating in black and white – the actions of Israel, despite the Isaeli government’s own propaganda to the contrary, are NOT representative of Judaism or Jews as a collective whole, any more than the actions of Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda are of Islam and muslims as a whole, or even the actions of the Bush Administration were of America or Americans as a whole.

I am not naive enough to believe that Israel cares about the impact of its actions on Diaspora Jewry.  After all, a chief tenet of Zionism is that the Diaspora will wither and die either through assimilation or overt anti-Semitism, which will in turn drive all Jews to return to their homeland, Israel.  But if Israel doesn’t care how its behavior impacts us then we sure should.  And we should be telling the Israeli government that we care even if they don’t.

Some Jews will argue that Muslims hate us anyway and would no matter what Israel did.  Their view is that claiming that Gaza exacerbated Muslim anti-Semitism is a red herring because Muslims are already anti-Semitic.  As Aziz says above about the Muslim friends he’s heard from–it’s hard to argue with such nonsense since it’s a self-fulfilling prophecy.  Most of the rest of us know better.  We know that what goes around comes around–that Israel’s actions have a direct impact on how the rest of the world views it and Jews.  It’s one of the reasons we want a peaceful settlement of the conflict.

In a related development–I regularly get Jewish hate mail especially during times of crisis like the Gaza assault.  Whenever Israel is viewed by Jews as being under siege (ironic phrase isn’t it considering what it’s doing to Gaza), the Jewish hate brigade rears its ugly head.  I’m going to save some of the choicest bits for another post.  All this by way of saying that today I received a precise mirror image from someone who purports to be a Palestinian.  I preface this by saying I have no way of knowing who this person is and whether they are really Palestinian or an impostor attempting to make Palestinians look bad.

At any rate, I think it’s instructive both to read the type of hate that the Gaza massacre engenders.  At the same time, I’d like you to read a reply sent to this person by one of my Muslim friends, which warmed the cockles of my heart.  Naturally, the original commenter refused to stand behind their hate and used a fake e mail address:

Haytham is Palestinian
the_autumn_mist@homail.com
78.101.198.157

You know its very “ironically” funny when most of you sick minded cunts talk. you must at this moment realize that you are worthless, & are nothing but a waste of natural resources on this planet.. alright this is my prediction over the span of the next century; and bear in mind this is actually quite possible, time shall rewind and play itself as you will be thrown off of earth like you were thrown off Europe, you would know this if you know your history. This is a fact, pre-1917 Israel did not exist, Jewish people lived mostly in Europe mostly on the edges of cities, why? because they were considered trash, yes =) , at some point the trash got piled up and needed to be incinerated, thats when good old hitler burned most of it, but left us some to know why he did it, unfortunately he left the trash that smelled the worse, and as destiny played on, this trash got into power, ofcourse this was achieved by using the “jewish holocaust” as leverage to capture the pity of the world and bear in mind this is true to this day. Now that the garbage demanded rights it demaded a country, thats were the man with mustache comes in , James arthur Balfour, and makes his declaration, puts the garbage on boats and ships it off to Palestine. Europe & the Americas were very thrilled and happy because they had cleaned their nations and were very supportive of Balfour.

By the way, this link is a video that shows Palestine before 1948.. a beautiful country.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGBoGKPZlQE

The trash doesnt arrive in mass scales until 1948, thats when they start destroying villages setting up colonies and clearing the area to make it a landfill =D and take away the right of return from the people living on and off the land.

ofcourse I can write for endless days about the shameful inhumane acts theyve done, but thats pointless because they are inhuman, they are trash. My point is,

1- Its not Israel its, Palestine.
2- We dont want peace, we want the trash out.
3- They are not suicide bombers, they are Patriots.
4- This war in Gaza is a falwless victory for its people and a war crime to note in your ever growing list.

Now to address the Gaza incident specifically, I will say, What gives you the right to kill 1300 people more than half of which are women and children, what gives you the right to bomb and destroy 25 Mosques, what gives you the right to use white phosphorus that inflicted more than 3000 injuries, what gives the right to bomb 7 schools, what gives you the right to bomb the medical & food storages warehouses with the UNROA flag on it, what gives you the right to bomb two hospitals when you know they are full of injuries from your weapons, what gives you the right to randomly bomb more than 10,000 Residential housings, what gives you the right to bomb the research facilities of al-quds university, what gives you the right to cut off electricy and water, what gives you the right to shoot down ambulances, what gives you the right prohibit people from burying their dead, what gives you the right to bomb a grave yard, what gives you the right to prohibit people from praying In al-Aqsa, dome of the rock.. tell me what? the American “Vito” ..

for all of you who say that palestinians started it with the rocket bombings, this is a little piece of information for you, Gaza was under siege for more than two years, with a very limited food and water supply, an hour of electricity each day, the people were not allowed to exit or enter the gaza strip, in other words they were dying slowly, and you dont expect them to fight! hahaha, No they will fight, & before they fight with their weapons they will fight with their hearts and faith and thats very far away from what your f-16’s, dime’s, & phosphorus can reach, you cant hurt what we are made from, and thats determination, we will battle your f-16 with home made rockets, and we will watch you shiver behinde your bunkers, wearing your armour carrying your guns affraid of the rock in our hands. these zionist acts will be punished one day, and history does not forget, one day, and that day will come & Palestine will be FREE.

Of course, there is no point responding to this. The writer didn’t even both to do the least research in publishing his or her comment to discover what my views were about Gaza. The fact that I agree about the facts of the Gaza attack as they’re laid out here would have no significance for someone like this. (Of course, the anti-Semitism and historic judgments about the Jewish people and Israel are nothing for which I have the least sympathy.)

The truth is that no matter how odious this comment is–it is a response, no matter how illegitimate–to the hate and violence levelled by the IDF against the people of Gaza. Israelis tend to see their every action as motivated by defense. They tend to see themselves as victims. They refuse to see how their actions can engender a mirroring hate among Palestinians. They refuse to understand that what goes around comes around.

I was so shocked by this comment that I circulated it to some Muslims with whom I’ve developed friendships in the course of writing this blog. One of them, Jeff Siddiqui, was so kind as to write a wonderful reply to “Haytham”:

Assalam alaikum (I presume you are an Arab and Muslim),

I was pained and shocked by the hate and crudity you displayed in your letter to Tikun Olam.

I am disgusted (as is TO’s owner, Richard Silverstein) by what Israel did to Gaza and what it has done to Palestinians over the past decades, but NONE of it deserves the shower of profanity and hate you threw.
I cannot believe that a Muslim who wishes only the best for Palestinians, would be satisfied to wish the worst for Jews…by doing so you dive into the same sewer as those who wish to hate us.

Your letter shamed me.

Jafar Siddiqui
American Muslims of Puget Sound

Solve the problem yourself or accept a fate you may not like…from this perspective, the ethic of personal responsibility gains appeal.

Do you know what is better than charity and fasting and prayer? It is keeping peace and good relations between people, as quarrels and bad feelings destroy mankind. (Bukhari and Muslim)

Do you know who is a poor person? A poor person in my community is someone who will come on the Day of Resurrection backed with prayers, fasting, regular charity, and pilgrimage, but also with a number of injustices to others, such as abusing this one, taking the property of that one, slandering someone, hitting another, or shedding the blood of someone else. Thereafter, [that person's] good deeds will be taken one after one and will be given to (those) who were wronged by him. (Sahih Muslim, Hadith 1179)

“Those in whose hearts is no mercy for others will not attain the mercy of Allah.” (Bukhari and Muslim)

I am deeply grateful to Jeff for speaking up not only on my behalf but on behalf of Islam.  It is important to realize that the worst among us do not necessarily reflect who the rest of us are whether we are Muslims or Jews.

And lest anyone think my purpose is to single out Muslims for criticism, there are huge levels of racism in Israel against Islam and Palestinians. Shortly, I will be writing about one such horrible instance as related in Haaretz. So if you’re ready to jump to any conclusions about the nature of Islam being intrinsically anti-Semitic, hold your fire until you’ve read what Israeli Jews are capable of.

My general conclusion is that there is more than enough hate already in the Middle East. What we need is a little more love. Or at least a little less hate.

Israel, Hamas Negotiating Over Long-Term Truce

Monday, January 26th, 2009

Haaretz brings news that Israel and Hamas are in the midst of serious negotiations under Egyptian auspices over a long-term truce.  According to the report, Israel has proposed up to a 10 year truce while Hamas has countered with a one-year offer.  As part of its offer, Israel would be willing to lift its 18-month blockade of Gaza:

Hamas spokesman Ayman Taha has said recently that Israel has offered his Palestinian Islamist group a 10-year cease-fire in the Gaza Strip.

Egypt is also demanding a truce of a number of years’ duration. But Taha, Hamas’ spokesman in the Gaza Strip, said the group would agree to a cease-fire of no more than between one year and 18 months. Another Hamas spokesman, Ismail Radwan, said a long-term cease-fire “kills” the right to resistance by the Palestinians.

The London-based newspaper Al-Hayat, meanwhile, reported on Monday that Israel has offered Hamas a cease-fire for an unlimited amount of time and the opening of Gaza’s borders in return for abducted Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit.

According to the report, Hamas rejected the offer on the grounds that it linked the opening of the border crossings to Shalit’s release.

Part of the negotiation involves how to monitor the borders in a way that is acceptable to both Israel and Hamas.  The presence of Israeli or Fatah monitors at the crossings is a sensitive one for Hamas as Israel in the past has used its presence to force the closing of the border for reasons that were less than transparent.

It appears that Hamas is balking at including the freeing of Gilad Shalit as part of the package that would include lifting the siege.  I hope and presume that the freedom of Shalit is something that is included in the final agreement.  Relations between Israel and Hamas should be as normalized as possible under current conditions.  They cannot be so if Shalit is not free.

If true (and its important to note that hopeful reports like this often turn out to be empty ones), this is a most welcome development as it provides hope of a more stable relationship between Hamas and Israel.  This also indicates that Israel IS negotiating with Hamas (albeit indirectly), something which Israel and the U.S. have taken great pains to claim they would never do.

Nowhere in this report is there any mention of Hamas recognizing Israel, which was another one of the supposedly “non-negotiable” principles that Israel and the U.S. demanded before it would negotiate with or recognize Hamas. One might even see the Israeli proposal for an unlimited or even 10 year truce as creeping toward Hamas’ own position, which publicly offered a long term hudna to Israel, a proposal that has been on the table for some time and rejected previously by Israel.

If the story is correct, it also proves that Israel’s vaunted claim that it invaded in order to silence Hamas rockets was for naught.  Just as the Jewish peace camp has claimed all along, the only thing that will silence the rockets is negotiations–each side compromising and giving up on something it considers important in order to get from the other side something it considers even more important.

I also take personal satisfaction from this development, as it puts the lie to Israel’s more noxious right-wing supporters who comment here (most of whose comments haven’t been published–though many more-civil ones opposing my views were), who’ve levelled disgusting insults and threats over the past four weeks at me for my alleged anti-Israel views and my alleged slavish support for Hamas.  I plan soon on mounting an “exhibition” here of some of the foulest ones to allow everyone to see just what these creeps are made out of.

All this will give George Mitchell something substantive to talk about with Olmert, Barak and Livni when he arrives on Wednesday.

Bibi Netanyahu: Lies, and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them

Sunday, January 25th, 2009

Netanyahu: Likud-led government wouldn’t build new settlements

A Likud-led government would not build new settlements in the West Bank but would allow for natural growth, Likud chairman Benjamin Netanyahu told Quartet envoy Tony Blair Sunday, in an apparent attempt to calm the international community before this week’s arrival of George Mitchell, the newly appointed U.S. envoy to the Middle East.

“I have no intention of building new settlements in the West Bank,” Netanyahu told Blair in a meeting Sunday. “But like all the governments there have been until now, I will have to meet the needs of natural growth in the population. I will not be able to choke the settlements.”

Netanyahu also said he plans to work to advance negotiations with the Palestinians quickly and to focus on economic development.

“Every moment of stagnation isn’t good, and I plan to deal with the Palestinian issue very intensively,” he said.

How does he lie? Let me count the ways. If anyone reading this truly believes he will not permit the building of new settlements they really should have their head examined. And even if we take him at his word he certainly will not stand in the way of settlers creating their own “facts on the ground.” That is, illegal settlements which somehow over time become legal ones as they’re absorbed into the Occupation regime.

I’ve talked here about the charade of “economic development” being the Bibi-style solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Only in the mind of an Israeli right-winger can there be a purely economic solution to the conflict. When all the world, and especially the Palestinians will tell anyone who cares to listen that the essence of this conflict is not economic (though there are terrible economic consequences as a result), and its not even primarily religious (though again their are religious elements). It IS primarily political and only a political settlement involving political compromise and creation of a political entity called Palestine on Israeli land occupied since 1967 (with minor adjustments) will resolve it.

As far as I’m concerned, Netanyahu thinks he’s still playing the games that all Israeli prime minister’s play with foreign diplomats and negotiators.  We tell you one thing with a wink and nudge, then go about doing precisely what we want.  It reminds me a bit of a cancer patient who’s just been given his diagnosis and told he needs to cut out cigarettes.  He swears to the doctor he will and as soon as the latter leaves the room he invites all his friends to join him as he lights up, saying to them: “Another one isn’t going to kill me.”  Well, guess what–it will.

I hope to God when George Mitchell meets with Netayahu later this week he will splash some cold water on the otherwise delusional Netanyahu and tell him that the U.S. view of his “economics” pitch is that it is decidedly a non-starter.  If Netanyahu wants Israel to die of cancer let’s tell him he’s not going to do it under our care.  We’ve got to tell Israel to go cold turkey.  It’s the only way.

Dershowitz ‘I Didn’t Have Particularly Good Brain’

Sunday, January 25th, 2009


In this interview, Alan Dershowitz reveals that his failure as a sausage maker and his lack of brains led him to the law. I swear the guy’s his own worst enemy. I call him a clown and buffoon and his pals who read this blog get offended. But you listen to the video and tell me how you can see it any differently. To me, he’s the pro-Israel version of Ann Coulter. All mouth and as A.A. Milne would’ve said: “A Jew of very little brain.”

By the way, the ingredients in those sausages he rolled was probably of higher quality than the substance of his arguments defending Israel’s egregious sins:

When I was  young everybody told me I had a good mouth, but I didn’t have a particularly good brain.  And so my principal called me in one day and said: “Find a profession that you use your mouth but not your head.  You could either be,”  he said, “a lawyer or a Conservative rabbi.”  I wasn’t smart enough to be a rabbi so I had to become a lawyer.

To reveal this in a public interview either signifies a supreme egomaniac or someone who is a supreme ironist.  We know which it is in Der Dersh’s case.

Among other subtle pieces of wisdom in this interview:

“Today, Israel is a source of embarrassment for French Jews and many British Jews. They want to disassociate themselves because otherwise they won’t be invited to dinner parties. It’s very important for people to restore a sense of pride in the accomplishments of the Jewish state.”

“I support Israel because I am a civil libertarian and a human rights activist,” says Dershowitz.

What he means to say is that he supports Israel because he wants to world to support Israeli JEWISH civil liberties and human rights. He certainly does not support Israel because he wishes the world to support the civil liberties of Israeli Arabs (though they too are citizens of Israel)–al ahat kama v’kama the rights of Palestinians. The latter are somewhere down in the lowest circle of Hell in terms of Dershowitz’s valuation of their claim to human rights.

Keep in mind, this is the same genius who defended Israel’s assaults on Lebanese civilians. I can only imagine how horrible his views would be about the recent butchery in Gaza.

It never ceases to amaze me that Jewish media outlets actually value the opinions of this buffoon.  Why would Haaretz feature him as it does in this interview?  Does anyone really care what he has to say about anything?  One thing I do have to hand it to him though: he has the market cornered on self-regard.