14 thoughts on “Netanyahu’s Tissue of Lies – Tikun Olam תיקון עולם إصلاح العالم
task-attention.png
Comments are published at the sole discretion of the owner.
 

  1. I tuned in. Do not desire to read your post because three fits of rage during the speech itself is enough for me. Thank you.

  2. Former US Army vice chief of staff General Jack Keane has likened Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech to the US Congress to Winston Churchill’s one during World War Two. [Source: Sky News Australia]

    ”Colonialists? What are you talking about … we have been here for 4,000 years …”

    Thankful … there is some daylight between Joe and Kamala … sliver of home in an cruel Middle East.

    First benefit of the Tory switch to Labour:

    UK won’t challenge ICC arrest warrant request for Netanyahu, Gallant
    deadline passed on 26 July

    UK appoints new attorney general critical of Israeli rights violations: Richard Hermer strongly opposed the anti-BDS bill and was among the Jewish lawyers urging Israel to respect international law in Gaza.

  3. As the death toll in Gaza for the Palestinians, mainly children and women, has reached nearly 40,000 leaving the survivors without water, food, clothing, fuel, electricity, communication systems, shelter, and medical support, I ask why, early morning on October 7 of the massacre, were Israeli sentry guards ordered to leave their posts as the security alarm system was deliberately turned off? It appears as if Netanyahu had earlier developed a plan to drive all Palestinians out of Gaza. Now, nearly all opposing Israelis who attempted to share this information have been silences as Congress acts without truth or knowledge.

    1. @ John Spring: You’re made claims that aren’t supported by credible evidence. THe claim that this was some sort of false flag event or that Netanyahu deliberately wanted the attack to succeed isn’t supported. Please do not spread disinformation here.

  4. Richard,

    any commentary on the speculation that the projectile that struck the soccer field in the occupied Golan Heights a couple of days ago was an Israeli one? Apparently some in the Syrian Druze community believe so and they weren’t too happy with Israeli politicians trying to turn their “visit” into a PR op.

    1. Mr. Frog: My Israeli security source says it was definitely Hezbollah and that the intended target was likely the Mt. Hermon IDF base. But that the missile struck the village in error.

      1. I see. I know I’ve asked you this before, but have you considered that your source is just toeing the “party line” in terms of what the IDF says and what Israel says?

        I’m not saying you don’t know what you’re talking about obviously, but I assume this guy is an ideological zionist and is pro IDF– he’s just willing to give you the inside scoop on what the government and the israeli military say/plan on doing.

        1. @ Mr. Frog: He’s an Israeli security source. So of course he has his own agenda. But I’m not, and I have my own interests as a journalist. I view what my source tells me with a skeptical eye. But also generally trust the information he provides. When I am skeptical I will couch information in a non-definitive way.

    2. Following the attack on Majdal Shams, questions arise as to why Northern Command intelligence did not issue an early warning to northern residents to take shelter
      https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-812173

      The air force won’t say it openly, but Iran and Beirut are constantly trying to study and challenge Israel’s air defense system. This includes launching hundreds of UAVs and firing at the northern Golan while exploiting the Hermon’s topography.

  5. According to Israeli sources, organizers were worried about the 140 seats that would be empty. The Israeli contingent filled 30 or 40 of them, and the rest were filled with Republican staffers. So who was actually cheering? Nadler read a book the entire time, Democrats who came didn’t stand and cheer and Rashida held the fort for all of us demonstrating outside.

  6. In reviewing three cases involving different pieces of Facebook content containing the phrase “From the River to the Sea.” the Board finds they did not break Meta’s rules on Hate Speech, Violence and Incitement or Dangerous Organizations and Individuals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share via
Copy link