Young Israeli soldier’s 1948 letter to his parents compares Palestinian suffering during Nakba to the Holocaust
חבר קיבוץ עין חרוד ששירת בצה”ל במלחמת 1948 כתב לעיתון הקיבוץ עדות מצמררת על שיירות הפליטים הפלסטינים שראה והישווה אותם לפליטי השואה
This is a letter a young Israeli soldier sent home to his family on Kibbutz Ein Harod in 1948, a month after the War began. It was published in the kibbutz newspaper. Unfortunately, there is no name attached to it:
July 30 1948
Dear Parents and sisters:
I want to write you about something I encountered for the first time in this war. Since there was resistance here after the end of hostilities, the Arab inhabitants fled from their homes. They moved on the dirt road from both sides of the village we’d just conquered. Refugees. Refugees in the full meaning of the word [the Hebrew word for “refugee” derives from the word for “flight”]. Thousands and thousands streamed out. Every one of them loaded down with bedding, sacks of flour and sugar, baby strollers with basic food necessities, and valuables: different brands of watches, ornamented tea kettles, etc.
Further on the way, underneath the sun of our country, heat beat down and they began to throw away their possessions, leaving behind pots and pans. I saw their looks as they parted with them: a funereal look, feeling like the grave. I saw children losing track of their parents. In a garden, I found a little girl, about 3 years old, and brought her back to the road. The girl had walked down one path and her mother another. It was a miracle I found the mother. I saw their reunion and got the thankful praise of the mother. I will never forget this experience.
Image 2: At the side of the road was a well. A tremendous mass of people gathered around it. It was impossible to find a place to sit, even 50 meters from the well – people stood crowded everywhere. The thirst made people lose their minds. Ten men were standing around the well pumping out water, even though there wasn’t room for more than two. I sat next to the well and ensured no Arab infiltrators could cross to our base.
A young Arab came to me and told me his brother, a boy of 4, fell into the well, and the men pumping water refused to stop pumping for even a few moments, just enough to save the kid from drowning. I was shocked. After I realized that my self-confidence alone was enough to control the mass of refugees, I fired a few shots in the air. The group was stunned. People got down on the ground and began to flee. I was able to make my way to the well and drew the boy out.
This image too: such a terrible thirst for water that they cared nothing for the death of a boy. Their fear in the face of just one single soldier, my heart will never forget. I began to understand what a caravan of refugees meant.
Image 3: We returned by way of another village. The field was strewn with abandoned belongings. Here and there, in particular next to the wells, there were corpses of Arabs stabbed by their brethren. Among them, other refugees bedded down to sleep. Every 100 meters or less, there was a body, mostly women and elderly, lying on their backs, totally spent. Some were still dying. Everwhere along the road belongings were strewn. In one place I saw a big pile of mattresses. Next to it was a big puddle with a broken jug and three bodies. Two were young boys and one a young girl. The girl and one of the boys were stabbed. The third boy, his mouth full of mud, was slowly dying from thirst.
This image made abundantly clear to me the meaning of “refugee.” The heavy bombardments, the 60 dead Jordanian Legion soldiers, our own fallen ones, the tanks and armored vehicles we captured, the assaults, a shell falling meters away from me, the imminent danger of death, a plane dropping bombs – all of these never left the impression that this refugee caravan did.
A Nakba refugee caravan
It’s hard for me even to describe these moments as they were, but they were fateful for me. Now my own [battle experience] seems pitiful [in comparison]. I will tell you the truth: I have more to write, and I have a pen and a paper, but I feel that what I write is a paltry account of the reality and I have no more energy to write. When I get home, I will tell you. In person, it will be easier. That will free me a bit from this terrible burden of the refugee caravan. I tell myself that only now can I understand the mental anguish of the Jewish immigrants from Cyprus [Holocaust survivors who came to Israel from refugee detention camps on Cyprus]. I look now with admiration on every immigrant who came from there. Thinking that he suffered the same horrors of the refugee caravan. But nevertheless arrived here and fought with us.
Fare well and goodbye for now.
It’s important to note that even in 1948, a month or so after the War began, that Israeli Jews understood the historical connection between Palestinian suffering and the suffering of Holocaust survivors. Not to mention that this soldier and his family found the letter important enough to publish, thereby establishing a historical record.
Displaced person (D)P) camp on Cyprus as Holocaust survivors waited to enmigrate to Palestine
The parallel he draws, today causes apoplexy among pro-Israel apologists and even arouses charges of anti-Semitism. But the key point is that Jewish suffering (and Israeli Jewish suffering) are neither exceptional nor unique. Regardless of that suffering, they can, did, and do inflict the same suffering on another people. Despite genocides being different in different eras and locales, they are all a form of genocide. And this is a schandeh and chilul hashem. My God does not command me to destroy another people. To steal from it, arrest and kill its children. That’s not my Judaism.
On this general subject, I recommend the film, Farha. It is a moving account of the Nakba and the eradicaton of a single Palestinian village and the forced exile of its inhabitants. Watch it on Netflix.
Similarly, I also recommend the documentaries, Born in Deir Yassin. (see video embed below).
There are two documentaries about the Tantura massacre. The Israeli one was screened at Sundance. Watch a trailer below.
Thanks to Barak Mayer, who maintains an important Twitter account and blog, Places Time Forgot, dedicated to publishing archival historical documents and images of Zionist history, including the Nakba. He revised my own translation of this letter and vastly improved it.
11 thoughts on “Nakba Memoir: Israeli Soldier Speaks of Horror – Tikun Olam תיקון עולם إصلاح العالم”
Comments are published at the sole discretion of the owner.
But of course if you mention the Nakba then according to Israeli propagandists like Tzipi Hotoveli, Ambassador to London, it is an ‘Arab lie’. And to keep it that way they keep all files in their archives locked in perpetuity.
Instead of drawing universal lessons from the Holocaust Zionism only seeks to emulate those who drove the Jews out or to death
Now let us consider that 127 Palestinian Jews were massacred and expelled from Gush Etzion in May, 1948, only weeks before the expulsions that this soldier witnessed.
The Deir Yassin murders of Palestinians had already occurred but you don’t bother to mention that or the UK policy that refused to permit representation elections during the Mandate years – because the arriving Jews were outnumbered by the indigenous Semitic population. Zionism has never accepted the democratic principle that elections of the people governed should precede formation of the government. Israel is the most antiSemitic government on earth, a fact ignored by the ADL.
.
@ Top Cat: Horses*t. The issue began when the First Aliyah began. The first Zionist immigrants were colonists. There were also Europeans who were quite familiar with colonialism. They were superior and the “natives” inferior, as in any colonial relationship.
And hey, if you don’t believe me, let’s consult a eyewitness writing all the way back in 1891, Ahad HaAm:
” ….[the Zionist pioneers believed that] the only language the Arabs understand is that of force ….. [They] behave towards the Arabs with hostility and cruelty, trespass unjustly upon their boundaries, beat them shamefully without reason and even brag about it, and nobody stands to check this contemptible and dangerous tendency.” (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 7
Despite this, at first the Palestinians accepted, and often welcomed the newcomers. A friend of mine who is an expert in issues of Zionist history, writes this:
Jerusalem in the mid 19th century was majority Jewish but there were no riots. It was not a Jewish presence they objected to but a Jewish nationalist and political presence in the form of colonisation.
It became clear that the Zionist project left no room for them and that they were to be squeezed out (either quickly or gradually). Palestinian violence didn’t spring ex nihilo. It was spurred by the fraudulent deals which stole farming lands from Palestinian farmers and similar acts of depredation.
I simply will not accept any false narrative which places all blame on the Palestinians, as you do. It’s not just wrong, but propaganda.
Yet another warning, your comment is off-topic. Confine yourself to the subject of the post and don’t stray into other subjects.
Dear Richard,
I have just finished watching “Farha” and the heart continues to weep. So I thank you for continuing to bring forth the stories that tell the truth of the Nabka and the terrible irony of those who suffered in Europe then inflicting suffering on those who simply needed to be on their land in peace.
Hello Mr. Silverstein, I read the letter you posted and your comments.
I agree that all conflict is regrettable and that human suffering is terrible.
But honestly I don’t understand the comparison you offer. During November 1947 the United Nations suggested a two state solution to the conflict. This was accepted by the Jewish participants but rejected by the Arab participants who declared their intentions to declare war and annihilate the Jews. They had no choice but to defend themselves or be wiped out.
Historically most of the Arab refugees fled their homes at the instruction of their own leaders, who ordered them to leave until after the fighting was over.
So how can you blame the Jews for what was forced upon them?
Thank you for your time.
Derek Peters
@ Derek: In short, virtually everything you write is Zionist propaganda. None of it is true. There isn’t a shred of historical evidence for a single claim in your comment. I don’t know where you dug this up, but it comes right out of a 40 year old Hasbara Handbook. It won’t wash. But alas I have niether the energy nor will to rebut you point by point. Doing so would bore me to tears. Others may want to jump in to do so. If not, we’ll just let yr comment slip into the oblivion it so richly deserves.
One cardinal rule here: if you want to make historical claims you use EVIDENCE to support them. YOu don’t spout propaganda and expect anyone here to treat them seriously. I doubt you will comment here again since you are a hasbara tourist. But if you do, garbage like this devoid of any proof or evidence will get you into hot water here.
Derek, in Nov 1947 the UN General Assembly voted narrowly, to partition Palestine. The Arab League proposed representation elections in lieu of a partition but the General Assembly committee that drafted the pro-partition resolution referred to the Arab League democracy-first, proposal as “extreme.”
In Dec 1948 the UN Security Council took up the GA pro-partition resolution and rejected it. You state, that the UN endorsed the partition of Palestine without a representation election, That is false.
See: “The Rejection of Palestinian Self-determination” Jeremy R. Hammond (2009)
Thanks for visiting Tikun Olam. It breaks exclusive stories on Israel-Palestine. It offers news often banned by the Israeli military censor or a judicial gag order. Please subscribe to new posts–and tell all your friends!
Support my unique work with a tax-deductible donation to Media Alliance, my fiscal sponsor.
Be a Mensch: Support Tikun Olam!
Thanks for visiting Tikun Olam. It breaks exclusive stories on Israel-Palestine, often not yet published anywhere, including Israel. Please subscribe to new posts–and tell all your friends!
Support my unique work with a tax-deductible donation to Media Alliance, my fiscal sponsor.
But of course if you mention the Nakba then according to Israeli propagandists like Tzipi Hotoveli, Ambassador to London, it is an ‘Arab lie’. And to keep it that way they keep all files in their archives locked in perpetuity.
Instead of drawing universal lessons from the Holocaust Zionism only seeks to emulate those who drove the Jews out or to death
Sorrowful indeed.
The soldier feels for all refugees.
Now let us consider that 127 Palestinian Jews were massacred and expelled from Gush Etzion in May, 1948, only weeks before the expulsions that this soldier witnessed.
C’est le guerre.
The Deir Yassin murders of Palestinians had already occurred but you don’t bother to mention that or the UK policy that refused to permit representation elections during the Mandate years – because the arriving Jews were outnumbered by the indigenous Semitic population. Zionism has never accepted the democratic principle that elections of the people governed should precede formation of the government. Israel is the most antiSemitic government on earth, a fact ignored by the ADL.
.
@Richard Cook
The cycle of violence did not begin with Deir Yassin, which bloodshed began in the 1920’s (and we know who spilled first blood).
@ Top Cat: Horses*t. The issue began when the First Aliyah began. The first Zionist immigrants were colonists. There were also Europeans who were quite familiar with colonialism. They were superior and the “natives” inferior, as in any colonial relationship.
And hey, if you don’t believe me, let’s consult a eyewitness writing all the way back in 1891, Ahad HaAm:
Despite this, at first the Palestinians accepted, and often welcomed the newcomers. A friend of mine who is an expert in issues of Zionist history, writes this:
It became clear that the Zionist project left no room for them and that they were to be squeezed out (either quickly or gradually). Palestinian violence didn’t spring ex nihilo. It was spurred by the fraudulent deals which stole farming lands from Palestinian farmers and similar acts of depredation.
I simply will not accept any false narrative which places all blame on the Palestinians, as you do. It’s not just wrong, but propaganda.
Yet another warning, your comment is off-topic. Confine yourself to the subject of the post and don’t stray into other subjects.
[comment deleted: I told you you may only publish a single comment in any comment thread. 2nd strike. 3rd & you’re out.]
This link goes into great detail how the Zionist colonists viewed the Arabs with disdain, and how they were able to take advantage of the unique system of land ownership in order to buy land which lead to the displacement of the peasants.
https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1537&context=aulr&sei-
Dear Richard,
I have just finished watching “Farha” and the heart continues to weep. So I thank you for continuing to bring forth the stories that tell the truth of the Nabka and the terrible irony of those who suffered in Europe then inflicting suffering on those who simply needed to be on their land in peace.
Hello Mr. Silverstein, I read the letter you posted and your comments.
I agree that all conflict is regrettable and that human suffering is terrible.
But honestly I don’t understand the comparison you offer. During November 1947 the United Nations suggested a two state solution to the conflict. This was accepted by the Jewish participants but rejected by the Arab participants who declared their intentions to declare war and annihilate the Jews. They had no choice but to defend themselves or be wiped out.
Historically most of the Arab refugees fled their homes at the instruction of their own leaders, who ordered them to leave until after the fighting was over.
So how can you blame the Jews for what was forced upon them?
Thank you for your time.
Derek Peters
@ Derek: In short, virtually everything you write is Zionist propaganda. None of it is true. There isn’t a shred of historical evidence for a single claim in your comment. I don’t know where you dug this up, but it comes right out of a 40 year old Hasbara Handbook. It won’t wash. But alas I have niether the energy nor will to rebut you point by point. Doing so would bore me to tears. Others may want to jump in to do so. If not, we’ll just let yr comment slip into the oblivion it so richly deserves.
One cardinal rule here: if you want to make historical claims you use EVIDENCE to support them. YOu don’t spout propaganda and expect anyone here to treat them seriously. I doubt you will comment here again since you are a hasbara tourist. But if you do, garbage like this devoid of any proof or evidence will get you into hot water here.
Derek, in Nov 1947 the UN General Assembly voted narrowly, to partition Palestine. The Arab League proposed representation elections in lieu of a partition but the General Assembly committee that drafted the pro-partition resolution referred to the Arab League democracy-first, proposal as “extreme.”
In Dec 1948 the UN Security Council took up the GA pro-partition resolution and rejected it. You state, that the UN endorsed the partition of Palestine without a representation election, That is false.
See: “The Rejection of Palestinian Self-determination” Jeremy R. Hammond (2009)