14 thoughts on “Israeli Crime Reporter Claims Police Dropped Even Rape Case – Tikun Olam תיקון עולם إصلاح العالم
Comments are published at the sole discretion of the owner.

  1. Pravada a la Silverstein..
    i doubt you will have the integrity to actually publish the post, seems to me your censorship skills are second only to the ones used by Mother Russia during the glory days

    Ben says:
    April 26, 2011 at 2:55 AM
    So let me get that straight
    you are saying that even if the state will exonerate Even, You Richard think after reading the court transcripts (i assume you didn’t read the police report) that regardless of what the state will find Even is guilty.
    did I get that straight ?
    Richard Silverstein says:
    April 26, 2011 at 12:28 PM
    You’re speaking nonsense. You don’t even begin to understand my position. I don’t take well to people who misconstrue my views because either they have no reading comprehension skills or because they willfully distort them.

    1. Follow the links buddy boy. If you had done this elementary amt of work you’d see the post displayed at Dvorit Shargel’s blog. Do I have to hold yr hand??

      did I get that straight ?

      You never get anything straight & you didn’t get this one either.

      1. Mr. Silverstein.
        the fact that so lightly you expose such a delicate matter is unbelievable to me.
        as a women i am extremely offended, you give all of us a very bad name.

    2. i doubt you will have the integrity to actually publish the post

      I have no idea what you’re talking about…are you talking about your own comment? If so pls. learn the diff. bet. a comment and a post. A post is what I write. A comment is what you write. And if you were referring to your comment & yr certainty I wouldn’t publish it, I’m delighted to prove you wrong.

      But I am sorry to say that because you earlier wrote that my intentions vis a vis Israel were “despicable” & wishing for me to be “punished” you’ve been banned. It’s been nice knowing you.

      And if you ever decide you want to actually read the comment rules & respect them, I’d reconsider your banning. But that’s up to you.

  2. Richard,
    You’re losing a lot of credibility in this game you are playing.
    This is a silly game, everybody can come up with such stories based on single cases and write hate articles. Here I want to show you how it is done.
    How about writing about a subject like that:
    “US turns sexual harassment into standard procedure”
    American woman are getting used to being sexually harassed while boarding flights. Last week, Miss USA Sexually Molested by TSA… bla…bla…bla:

    1. free man, pay attention now. Richard made it hiss gig to publicize and directly take on Israel’ silly gag order. And I, for one, along with many others , think it’ totally commendable. Just because that state i heading down a proto-fascist path doesn’t mean everyone has to buy into that dark destiny. maybe Richard care more about Israel’s future than you do, and is doing what he can to keep it in the company of civilized societies elsewhere.

      Good for Richard to bring into the light that which thrives only in the slumpes of darkness. it’ a mighty worthy cause, if one that has no friends among the humanoids that dwell in caves where the sun don’t ever shine (and no disrespect to bats intended. They are creatures with a purpose too. Just that in the human version, well, it’s a bit slimy….what can I say…)

      1. Dana,
        I think Richard is doing a great job on the subject of the gag-orders in Israel. I do appreciate his work on the subject, that is why I read his blog and respond here. sometimes, however, i think he is too one sided on the Israeli-Palestinian divide, and I respond to that.
        In the latest posts, he claims an insight to the issue of sexual harassments in Israel and I think he is way off there. This is the point I want to make. Nothing to do with all the arguments he have on other subjects.
        In short very good work on gag issues, poor job as social analyst. In addition i don’t think he can improve there, cause he comes with a specific agenda that hinders him from being rational on the subjects he want to look at.

      1. You know nothing of my political stands. Calling my position “Israeli right” only shows how little you know of Israel and how fast you jump to the wrong conclusions.
        It only shows that you automaticaly label anybody who does not bow to your “infinit wisdom and unprecedented insights”.

  3. I can do even better with the BS article and continue to say:
    “Turning sexual harassement into standard procedure calls for specific people for the job. Many sex offendered and regular peepers apply for the job and find their vocation”. For example, Safety Administration Officer —– —— of Philadelphia Airport passenger screener charged in distributing child pornography.”

    You see, it is so easy, building phony theories out of internet real stories.

  4. Understanding rightfully it’s the gag order you criticise towards the fancied right to do so.
    Seems to be hard for some.

  5. I am appalled by Schtaif’s simlistic approach. I seem to remember her defend victims whom the police disbelieved, where charges would have been dropped were it not for her reporting. After that, she apprently rejoices that a complainant’s very preliminary testimony was found baseless. Schtaif should know that it’s usually more complicated than that.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *