7 thoughts on “Museum of In-Tolerance Screens Muslim-Hating Film, Third Jihad – Tikun Olam תיקון עולם إصلاح العالم
task-attention.png
Comments are published at the sole discretion of the owner.
 

  1. Just this week it was announced that Wilders will definitely be prosecuted in Holland for the sowing of hatred, for instigating discrimination and for insulting a minority (inter alia by calling the Koran the Moslem ‘Mein Kampf’).

    Attempts by his high profile Amsterdam lawyer, Abraham Moszkowicz, to get the prosecution called off by the Dutch High Court since, allegedly, Wilders statements fell under the freedom of expression guaranteed by the European Agreement on Human Rights came to nothing.

  2. Job Cohen, Mayor of Amsterdam, is one of Wilders’ special targets because he is doing too much to his liking for the integration of Moslems in Dutch society. He pleaded at one stage for a judicial investigation into the Mayor’s affairs because Amsterdam had allegedly paid too much for land destined for a new mosque.

    When Cohen visited New York, Mayor Bloomberg openly took up the cudgels for Wilders because allegedly ‘free speech’ had to be protected. I don’t know whether Bloomberg knew about Wilders’ anti-Cohen stance. An Op-Ed in the New York Times remarked that it was a bit rich for a fellow who wants the Koran to be banned to pose as a defender of free speech.

  3. This is slightly off topic but I think it will be of GREAT interest to readers of this web site. Could be a matter of life and death at some point.

    JINSA advocates censorship, military strikes on “partisan” media outlets

    JINSA is the hard-line, Likudnik Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs. They boast a pretty powerful line-up of present and former advisors including Dick Cheney, John Bolton, Douglas Feith and Richard Perle. If you’re looking for groups to blame for helping to get us into the endless war and now occupation of Iraq, JINSA is certainly a great place to start.

    The new edition of their house organ includes this remarkable gem, Wishful Thinking and Indecisive Wars, from retired US army officer Ralph Peters who says openly what we all suspect to be true every time an Al Jazeera office accidentally gets blown up in a war with the US, or the Israeli Defense Forces accidentally shoot a reporter. Revealing both constitutional contempt and the creepy linkages between right-wing Jews and fundamentalist Christian Zionists, Peters actually calls the media godless “neo-pagans” and advocates not only censorship but military strikes. The media, he insists, are a “hostile third party” in war, and must be treated as such.

    Of course, the media have shaped the outcome of conflicts for centuries, from the European wars of religion through Vietnam. More recently, though, the media have determined the outcomes of conflicts. While journalists and editors ultimately failed to defeat the U.S. government in Iraq, video cameras and biased reporting guaranteed that Hezbollah would survive the 2006 war with Israel and, as of this writing, they appear to have saved Hamas from destruction in Gaza.

    What????? It gets worse…

    Pretending to be impartial, the self-segregating personalities drawn to media careers overwhelmingly take a side, and that side is rarely ours. [Ed. emphasis] Although it seems unthinkable now, future wars may require censorship, news blackouts and, ultimately, military attacks on the partisan media. Perceiving themselves as superior beings, journalists have positioned themselves as protected-species combatants. But freedom of the press stops when its abuse kills our soldiers and strengthens our enemies. Such a view arouses disdain today, but a media establishment that has forgotten any sense of sober patriotism may find that it has become tomorrow’s conventional wisdom.

    As I pointed out, this already looks to, to varying degrees, like today’s conventional wisdom in Israel and the United States, two countries who never miss an opportunity to boast that they’re special precisely because they don‘t do such things. This all makes sense within Peters’ larger frame of understanding the role of the media, not as seekers of the truth but rather as a self-hating army all unto itself:

    Today, the United States and its allies will never face a lone enemy on the battlefield. There will always be a hostile third party in the fight, but one which we not only refrain from attacking but are hesitant to annoy: the media.

    While this brief essay cannot undertake to analyze the psychological dysfunctions that lead many among the most privileged Westerners to attack their own civilization and those who defend it, we can acknowledge the overwhelming evidence that, to most media practitioners, our troops are always guilty (even if proven innocent), while our barbaric enemies are innocent (even if proven guilty). The phenomenon of Western and world journalists championing the “rights” and causes of blood-drenched butchers who, given the opportunity, would torture and slaughter them, disproves the notion—were any additional proof required—that human beings are rational creatures. Indeed, the passionate belief of so much of the intelligentsia that our civilization is evil and only the savage is noble looks rather like an anemic version of the self-delusions of the terrorists themselves. And, of course, there is a penalty for the intellectual’s dismissal of religion: humans need to believe in something greater than themselves, even if they have a degree from Harvard. Rejecting the god of their fathers, the neo-pagans who dominate the media serve as lackeys at the terrorists’ bloody altar.

    Apostates! All of them!

    Back in 2002, the Nation’s Jason Vest wrote of JINSA and their friends, the Center for Security Policy(CSP):

    On no issue is the JINSA/CSP hard line more evident than in its relentless campaign for war–not just with Iraq, but “total war,” as Michael Ledeen, one of the most influential JINSAns in Washington, put it last year. For this crew, “regime change” by any means necessary in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia and the Palestinian Authority is an urgent imperative. Anyone who dissents–be it Colin Powell’s State Department, the CIA or career military officers–is committing heresy against articles of faith that effectively hold there is no difference between US and Israeli national security interests, and that the only way to assure continued safety and prosperity for both countries is through hegemony in the Middle East–a hegemony achieved with the traditional cold war recipe of feints, force, clientism and covert action.

    Just switch out the q with an n, and here we are all over again. Iran.

  4. HA! Oh where do I even begin, wanting to say succinctly what COULD as you know take up page after page of documentation.

    So the LA MOT has brought this “documentary” out of moth balls after, um, how long since it was first released? Seven months? The “Clarion Fund” has poked it’s head back up from under the rock it has been hiding under? Aren’t they so “yesterday” ala Valley girl speak?

    HELLO, it didn’t work last October with the mass mailing of “Obsession” nor with the timely release in “private showings” of this piece of garbage then, and it’s NOT going to work now either. Just goes to show how desperate they are Richard.

    Moving on now………….(not you Richard, THEM!)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share via
Copy link