Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for December, 2010

Israel’s Prisoner ‘Mr. X’ is Iranian Revolutionary Guard General Abducted by Mossad

Saturday, December 11th, 2010
ali reza asgari

Ali Reza Asgari, kidnapped by the Mossad, held incommunicado as 'Prisoner X'

This blog was the first to report last year that authorities at Israel’s Ayalon prison noted the existence of a prisoner about whom even they knew nothing, who received no visitors, was held incommnicado, had no lawyer, and was a virtual mystery.  A censored Israeli news report called him “Mr. X,” a story I broke last June.  Until today, we didn’t know who he is.  But through a confidential Israeli source I have exposed his identity.  He is a former Iranian Revolutionary Guard general and government minister under former President Khatami named Ali-Reza Asgari.  Western news outlets reported in 2007 that he either defected or was kidnapped by the Mossad, with the assistance of western intelligence agencies (either the CIA or British or German intelligence depending on the source) in Istanbul.  A conservative Iranian publication first reported last year that Asgari was in an Israeli prison and this was reported by AP as well.  Israeli media reported he had defected, and an Israeli claiming connections to Israeli intelligence reported to me that he was living quite comfortably “in Virginia.”  In hindsight, this seems a rather clumsy piece of disinformation.

Though some of the reporting may have been accurate, a good deal of what was written about his “defection” appears to have been a heady concoction devised by Mossad and others for the consumption of western media.  Wikipedia reports:

The Washington Post said that Asgari was willingly cooperating with Western intelligence officials, and was providing information on Hezbollah and its Iranian connections.

Among other things, this includes information with regards to the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing. Asgari also smuggled out intelligence documents and maps that detail Iranian involvement with Muslim militia groups, including Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad in Palestine, and the Iraqi Mahdi army and Badr Organization. A US intelligence official said that his defection was “orchestrated by the Israelis”, although Israeli spokesman Mark Regev denied this [ed, this wouldn't be the first time Mark Regev lied with a straight face]. The New York Post reported that an Iranian dissident group helped plan the defection and is negotiating with Western intelligence agencies for a “permanent place of exile”.

…According to The Sunday Telegraph, Asgari’s defection was part of a CIA program called “the Brain Drain”, which began in 2005 and later netted Iranian nuclear scientist Shahram Amiri.

…Yediot Aharonot reported that Asgari told US interrogators that Iran is secretly attempting to enrich uranium with a combination of lasers and chemicals at a weapons facility in Natanz; this would act as a backup if the publicly known facilities and activities were stopped by sanctions or military strikes. Israeli journalist Ronen Bergman expanded upon this reporting in his book The Secret War with Iran, in which he stated that Asgari had not only supplied the information regarding lasers, but had also revealed that a second site for centrifuges had been built near the principal Natanz site, and that a Syrian nuclear program, developed with North Korean help, was being paid for by Iran.

Al Jareeda reported that Asgari provided information for the Israeli airstrike on September 6 in Syria, code-named Operation Orchard; this was echoed by the intelligence group Stratfor, which reported that Asgari “gave Israel the intelligence on Syria’s missile program needed for the Syrian airstrike.” In March 2009, Neue Zürcher Zeitung reported that after defecting, Asgari told the U.S. about the secret Syrian nuclear reactor, built in partnership with North Korea and with Iranian financing. This was reportedly the first time the U.S. and Israel were alerted of the project.

ayalon prison

Ayalon Prison, 'home' of Iranian Revolutionary Guard general Reza Ali Asgari

Until now we didn’t know Asgari was Prisoner X, which means we know where he is being held by Israel as well.  Until now, we also did not have confirmation from an Israeli source that that country held Asgari.  My information would seem to give the lie to the claim of defection.  A man who defects isn’t held in a maximum security prison cell.  If in fact at one time Asgari was a defector, it would appear that he is not one now.  I doubt he is being held incommunicado by the Israelis for his health.

By the way, this cell in Ayalon’s Unit 15, is the same one specially built to hold Yigal Amir, assassin of Yitzhak Rabin.  In other words, it is meant to isolate the prisoner from the outside world and the rest of the prison system.

One wonders whether Asgari has worn out his welcome, exhausted his usefulness, or somehow brooked his Israeli spy handlers.  What would cause them to throw him in a maximum security prison if he indeed “sang” so well for his supper as Israel claims?

The AP story notes a German source confirming Asgari provided a treasure trove of valuable intelligence to the Israelis:

Hans Ruehle, a former chief of the planning staff of the German Defense Ministry, wrote in a Swiss newspaper in March that Asgari told the West that Iran was financing North Korean steps to transform Syria into a nuclear weapons power, leading to an Israeli airstrike that targeted a site in Syria on Sept. 6, 2007.

…Ruehle said Asgari, who was instrumental in establishing the Hezbollah militant group in Lebanon, “changed sides” and provided information to the West on Iran’s own nuclear program.

…Iranian officials have said Asgari was not linked to Iran’s nuclear program, but Western media reports have said he has cooperated with U.S. intelligence and is considered a “high value” defector.

…Ziba Ahmadi, one of Asgari’s two wives, claimed at the time that her husband did not defect to Turkey and she believed “some evidence” showed he was abducted.

Recently, Asgari’s wife and family released a statement reported in the Iranian press:

The family of Alireza Asgari, [Iran's] former deputy defense minister who was kidnapped four years ago, presented a letter to the Turkish Ambassador [to Iran] and asked that his disappearance be investigated. Ziba Ahmadi, wife of Asgari, said that four years have passed since her husband was kidnapped, and said to IRNA that in the letter that she presented to Turkey’s ambassador she requested that her husband’s case be pursued.

Emphasizing that the Turkish government must do more about Asgari’s case, she said that “we are are certain that he was kidnapped in Istanbul, Turkey.” Ahmadi said that the intelligence agency of the Zionist Regime has been involved in Asgari’s kidnapping, and said that she has asked Turkish officials to put more pressure on the Zionist regime [regarding the case].

Most of the world believes that the souring of relations between Israel and Turkey occurred as a result of the Gaza war and the subsequent Mavi Marmara massacre.  In fact, this abduction on Turkish soil can’t have endeared Israel to the Turkish government and certainly is an added factor in Turkish disenchantment with Israel.

An Israeli human rights NGO has already demanded that Prisoner X be accorded the same rights that any security prisoner is accorded in the Israeli prison system.  So it is appropriate to renew this demand at this time, now that we know who the prisoner is.  Just because is a high-level Iranian officer does not mean he can be held forever without rights.  Israel must give some accounting of him, explain to Iran why it is holding him and what it intends to do with him.  If he is a defector then Israel should allow him to live freely.  If he is a prisoner, then Israel must either try him for whatever his crimes might be or release him.  I would remind Israel that a democracy does not hold its enemies in such fashion.  It gives due process, legal rights, fair trial, etc.

UPDATE: Another Israeli academic I know with ties to a prominent Israeli reporter who he would not name, who it turn has close ties with the Mossad, claims Asgari is not in Ayalon Prison.  While there is a possibility my source was provided with false information upon which this story is based, I strongly doubt it and stand by the story.  Not the least of the reasons for my doubt of the Israeli reporter, who claims to know who REALLY is in Ayalon Prison’s Unit 15, is that he won’t come forward with that information, while my source will.

Thanks for Farsi translation, Prof. M. Sahimi.

Carmel Fire Thaws Israeli Relations With Turkey

Friday, December 10th, 2010
mavi marmara victim

Mavi Marmara victim who couldn't be saved

Turkey’s humanitarian gesture of sending firefighting air tankers to help combat the Carmel fire seems to have melted the ice in Turkish-Israeli relations.  Haaretz is reporting that a possible resolution of the Mavi Marmara impasse may be at hand, by which Israel would pay $100,000 to each dead victim’s family and a smaller amount to those wounded.  One of the main sticking points appears to be Israel’s refusal to use the word “apology” and its insistence on the term “regret.”  Israel is also balking at apologizing to the Turkish people and prefers that its statement be addressed in humanitarian terms only to those who were killed or wounded in the incident.

Another intent of the settlement would bar Israel or its citizens from being sued for damages as a result of the attack.

At any rate, if a deal is struck it will mark a major climb-down by Netanyahu from his formerly adamant position that Israel’s actions were entirely defensive and praiseworthy.  It will also mark a major victory for the Turkish prime minister in his international campaign for Israeli accountability for the massacre.  I doubt Israelis will make Bibi pay a price for such a deal.  They will cynically view it as the cost of doing business in terms of Israel’s position on the world stage.

As is typical of Israeli politics, we have the spectacle of disgraced former prime minister and Bibi-enemy, Ehud Olmert denouncing Bibi’s possible deal while holding up to view his own government’s supposedly spotless record of maintaining an impermeable seal on Gaza.  And of course, Avigdor Lieberman considers an agreement akin to selling out Israel’s interests.  Next, we’ll hear Tzipi Livni weigh in with some mindless grandstanding of her own.

Barak in Washington Calls for UN Chapter 7 Resolution, Could Authorize Force Against Iran

Friday, December 10th, 2010

Ehud Barak was a guest on Greta Van Sustern’s FoxNews show tonight (no I don’t watch regularly, I was channel surfing) and made some surprising statements after a meeting with the UN’s Ban Ki-Moon.  First, Van Sustern asked him almost querulously: Geez, you won’t stop settlements, the Palestinians won’t come to the table unless you do, what do you expect us to do for you?  Barak’s clueless answer shows just how bereft of options he and his government are at this juncture:

I’ll be tomorrow in Washington and early next week, I’ll probably know more.  I am here to try and help to find the right formula.

When your interviewer asks you what her country can do to help you make peace and all you can do is punt–not a good sign.  To paraphrase a Paul Simon lyric: you don’t know where you’re going and my friend neither do I.

One of the neat ideas Barak has dreamed up to force the Palestinians back to the table (yes, didn’t you know it was the Palestinians’ fault the negotiations failed?) is for the UN to demand that the Palestinians resume negotiations.  That’ll go over big with a world body which basically believes that this whole mess is Bibi & Co.’s fault.

Neat idea #2 concerned Iran: as far as Barak and sanctions are concerned, you ain’t seen nothing yet.  The operative word for sanction hawks used to be “punishing sanctions.”  Now they’re ratcheted up the rhetoric and the Israeli defense minister is calling for “paralyzing sanctions.”  Perhaps he’s calling for inducing an Iranian polio epidemic?  What else could that mean?  Laying siege to Iranian ports?  Boarding ships on the high seas to enforce a blockade?  Who knows, and the skies the limit as far as those pesky Israelis are concerned.

When asked how far Iran was from getting a nuclear weapon, Barak demurred giving a substantive answer.  But he did make this revealing reference I haven’t heard an Israeli official make in a long time:

I think and I expect in the [garbled] community while considering the timeline for all these sanctions and Chapter 7 kind of resolutions in the UN Security Council, to bear in mind that time is not infinite and beyond a certain window of opportunity the Iranians will get immunity through redundancy [they will have the components of their nuclear weapons so dispersed and redundant that their program cannot be stopped].

The reference to Chapter 7 really caught my eye because it’s the category of resolution that is necessary in order to approve the use of force against a member state.  In fact, the Bush Administration attempted to invoke it in 2006.  Typically, the interviewer let the reference slip by and didn’t catch its potential significance.

Of course, there are several members of the Security Council who might frown on a Chapter 7 resolution since it clearly could be construed as a step closer to war.  Barak can’t seriously believe Israel would get such a resolution through the Council.  But since he’d just returned from a meeting with the UN secretary-general, this was clearly one of the things he was proposing.  I believe it’s likely this is a part of the game of psychological warfare waged by the Israelis against the Iranians.  But what the Israelis don’t seem to realize is that the Iranians are not stupid.  They know Israel has no hope of such a resolution.  So the entire exercise appears as a bluff, making Israel appear to be an empty suit.

I also believe the entire issue of Iran, as far as Israel is concerned, is that slight distraction that magicians count on to fool their mark.  It’s the moment that allows the magician to pull off the trick.  In this case, the trick is the Palestinian conflict and Iran is the distraction, the escape valve that lets off steam when Israel fails to meet its obligations to negotiate an end to the conflict.  What better way to turn the world’s attention away from Israel’s failure than to conjure the Iranian bogeyman who allegedly threatens not just Israel, but the entire world?

Haaretz reports that 26 former EU leaders have signed a sharp letter to the current EU leadership asking it to take strong measures to protest Israel’s violation of international law and to support Palestinian efforts to establish a state.  Among the signatories were former EU foreign affairs minister Javier Solana, former German president Richard von Weizsacker, former Irish president Mary Robinson, and former prime ministers of Spain and Italy, Felipe Gonzales and Romano Prodi:

The European leaders are backing the Palestinians’ efforts to rally international support for the recognition of an independent Palestinian state as an alternative to the negotiations that have reached an impasse. They note that the Palestinians cannot expect to be able to set up an independent state without international political and economic assistance.

…They also want it made clear that a European Union decision to upgrade relations with Israel and other bilateral agreements will be frozen unless Israel freezes settlement activities in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

They also propose that the EU announce that it will not accept any unilateral changes to the 1967 border that Israel carried out against international law, and that the Palestinian state would cover an area the same size as the area occupied in 1967. This would also include the establishment of a capital in East Jerusalem.

George Gershwin wrote: “How long has this been going on?”  Now, the question is how much longer can this go on?

Israeli Rabbis Urge Refusal to Rent to Arabs, Echoing Nuremberg Laws

Thursday, December 9th, 2010

In a move reminiscent of Nazi-era Nuremberg Race Laws, a group of radical Orthodox rabbis led by the chief rabbi of Tzfat urged fellow Israeli Jews to refuse to rent apartments to non-Jews:

Dozens of Israel’s municipal chief rabbis have signed on to a new religious ruling that would forbid the rental of homes to gentiles in a move particularly aimed against Arabs, Haaretz has learned.

The religious ruling comes just months after a group of 18 prominent rabbis, including the chief rabbi of Safed, signed a call urging Jews to refrain from renting or selling apartments to non-Jews.

…The rabbis’ letter…urges Jewish owners of apartments to reconsider renting their properties to Arabs since it would deflate the value of their homes as well as those in the neighborhood.

“Their way of life is different than that of Jews,” the letter stated. “Among [the gentiles] are those who are bitter and hateful toward us and who meddle into our lives to the point where they are a danger.”

The rabbis also urge neighbors of anyone renting or selling property to Arabs to caution that person. After delivering the warning, the neighbor is then encouraged to issue notices to the general public and inform the community.

“The neighbors and acquaintances [of a Jew who sells or rents to an Arab] must distance themselves from the Jew, refrain from doing business with him, deny him the right to read from the Torah, and similarly [ostracize] him until he goes back on this harmful deed,” the letter reads.

What is especially significant about this development is that the municipal rabbis are employees of the State, which means that the nation is, in effect, endorsing their views…unless it renounces them.  And so far it hasn’t.  The attorney general has refused to take up the matter.  Nor has the chief rabbi of Israel, who is technically the boss of the municipal rabbis.  Tzfat’s chief rabbi, Shmuel Eliyahu, is among the most extremist in his views of Palestinian Israelis and many are seeking to bring a charge of incitement against him for this and his previous remarks.

Here is the chief rabbi’s reply:
nazi era anti jewish laws

The Chief Rabbinate is responsible for matters of Jewish law and professional issues pertaining to municipal rabbis. Theoretically, the two chief rabbis can summon a municipal rabbi for a disciplinary hearing if the attorney general concludes he has exceeded his authority or acted improperly. Such action has rarely been taken.

Oded Weiner, director general of the Chief Rabbinate, told Haaretz that the institution “does a great deal for interreligious dialogue, worldwide and with the Palestinian Authority [!].” But Weiner added that “every rabbi in his city says what is in his heart.”

Weiner said that in the past, chief rabbis handled such issues quietly with the individuals involved. “I have not seen the letter the municipal rabbis signed,” he said. “When we receive a query from any quarter, I’m sure the chief rabbis and the Council of the Chief Rabbinate will consider the matter.” Weiner said Chief Rabbi Yona Metzger would not take the issue to the council on his own initiative.

Apparently, decentralization of authority works well for rabbis when they wish to permit themselves to express the overt racism that “is in their hearts.”  But were a rabbi to be overly sympathetic to Palestinians (little likelihood of that I recognize), then all of a sudden the chief rabbi would invoke the power invested in him to take swift action.

In response, a group of prominent Israelis have demanded the immediate firing of the state-funded rabbis:

A group of public figures, intellectuals and academics have asked [attorney general] Weinstein to immediately suspend any public servants among the rabbis who signed the document, those “who trample underfoot the pledges of the Declaration of Independence on which Israel was founded, turn Judaism into racism and openly break the law prohibiting incitement to racism.”

Israeli blogger Idan Landau and others have noticed the ironic historic echo of the Nazi-era race laws which severely restricted social, commercial, sexual and professional contacts between Jews and non-Jews.  Interestingly, Landau displays this 1939 document which allows non-Jews to break leases signed with Jewish tenants and generally seeks ways of constricting Jews so they will be forced to live only in Jewish-owned property.  Even here though, the Nazi authorities did not explicitly reject the notion of a non-Jew renting to a Jew.  By the time they passed Law 234 (presumably after 1939) though, even this was withdrawn:

Law #234 told landlords that they could no longer rent to Jews. This made many Jews homeless, since a Jew kicked out of his home could not find any other place to rent. These Jews were then picked up by the police and sent to murder camps.

Israeli authorities must address this issue firmly or they risk become facilitators of the kind of racism and hatred which Jews suffered in Nazi-era Germany.  And a prime minister’s rap on the knuckles delivered mainly for foreign consumption is not enough.  There must be consequences.  Isn’t it enough that the Carmel fires have made Israel a punchline for bad jokes, that the country should allow this too to add to the black eye?  Diaspora Jewish leaders too have a responsibility to staunch the blood draining from the wounds of Israeli democracy through such wounds.

Do we really want to go down that road (again)?

And lest anyone attempt to argue that these rabbis are pure crackpots not representing anyone, I remind you that the Israel Democracy Institute 2010 survey found that 46% of Israeli Jews said they would be “bothered” by having Israeli Palestinians as neighbors.  This was higher than the number which would be troubled by having gay, mentally ill, foreign workers, or ultra-Orthodox neighbors.

H/t to Sol Salbe.

Send Wikileaks Some Love (and Cash)

Wednesday, December 8th, 2010

Blogs like this one could not exist without sources like Wikileaks.  I have had my own Bradley Mannings provide invaluable information which they and I deemed to be vital for my readers to know.  Information which governments and intelligence services like Israel, the Mossad and Shabak did not anyone to know.  That is why it pains me to see the campaign of persecution conducted by the power elites in the U.S. and elsewhere who’ve forced its web host, Paypal, Amazon, Mastercard and Visa (among others) to buckle under government pressure.

Since I have been the victim of a DOS attack I don’t relish this form of counterattack, but I must say these corporate monoliths have far more resources at their disposal to fight back and also have engaged in egregious conduct.  I would rather engage in a campaign of shame and boycott against them to hurt their reputation and business plan.  Though these companies are so ubiquitous in their respective fields it’s hard for any of us to withdraw from Paypal or the credit card system.

Counterpunch published an expose (and more comprehensively here) about Julian Assange’s accusers.  The tone and substance of this piece is flippant, self-serving and borderline offensive.  And I feel ambivalent about attacking someone claiming to be a victim of sex abuse.  But some of the material uncovered does make one question the motives of at least one of the accusers.  Also, I feel queasy about charging someone with the serious charge of rape as a result of engaging in consensual sex which somewhere in the course of the act became nonconsensual.

I don’t profess to know or care about Julian Assange’s sex life, though it does seem that a man in such circumstances could behave in a manner much more circumspect than he has chosen.

Aside from all of this, Wikileaks has pierced the veil of government secrecy, especially of governments like the U.S. and Israel whose policymaking apparatus is particulary opaque.  For this reason alone, Assange and Wikileaks deserve our support.  You may still support Wikileaks by bank transfer or mail:

Skulagötu 19, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland
Landsbanki Islands Account number 0111-26-611010
BANK/SWIFT:NBIIISREXXX
ACCOUNT/IBAN:IS97 0111 2661 1010 6110 1002 80

WikiLeaks
BOX 4080
Australia Post Office – University of Melbourne Branch
Victoria 3052
Australia

What’s That Giant Sucking Sound? Peace Talks Going Down the Toilet

Tuesday, December 7th, 2010
obama netanyahu

Bibi takes the measure of the man and thinks: "Sucka!"

With a nod to Ross Perot…It’s the sound of the Obama administration pulling the plug on the Israeli settlement freeze extension and peace talks.  Pres. Obama leaves it to a big news day (another failure disguised as a victory) to announce a major foreign policy failure, that he’s given up on his vaunted 90-day settlement freeze extension.  The reasons offered are instructive.  It went down the drain because Bibi couldn’t deliver the votes in his Cabinet to get the extension and because:

…The 90-day negotiating period would not have produced the progress on core issues that the administration originally had hoped for…

If Obama, Mitchell and Clinton had just read my blog before committing to this path they could’ve saved themselves the trouble.  I wrote precisely this when they embarked.  How can you solve in 90 days, issues you haven’t been able to solve in years, if not decades?  90 days would be great if you had two sides ready to go.  But Israel is about as unready to go as any party can be.

This makes the Obama policy toward the Israeli Palestinian conflict a total shambles.  God, what a mess.

This is why there are alternative proposals out there to advance the peace process.  That is why there is BDS.  That is why there is the PA proposal to recognize unilaterally a Palestinian state, as Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay (whose recognition will be formalized sometime in 2011) did yesterday.  I would urge the Arab League to follow suit along with non-aligned nations like Turkey.  When the steamroller gathers enough momentum it will be too late for Israel and the U.S. to do anything to stop it.  All that will be left is for them to recognize a fait accompli (of course it will be more complicated than that, but at least the heavy lifting will already have been done).

If Obama wishes to retrieve his massive failure there is only one way to do so (and I’m afraid he is constitutionally incapable of doing this), and that is to energetically, boldly attack the problem and all the players who stand in his way.  There must be demands made and consequences for rejection of them.  All this can be done in a fair-minded, deliberate way that leaves the world with the clear impression the president is being firm, but fair.

But as a I say it appears that this president doesn’t have the components of the truly great presidents who were willing to, and even relished, looking an opponent in the eye and staring him down when necessary.  Obama doesn’t have the steely resolve that is necessary for greatness as a leader.  Think of Teddy Roosevelt, Lincoln, FDR.  Would they have wilted in the face of Bibi?

Others have said this, but our president would make a great professor.  He can distill the arguments of both sides brilliantly.  But he doesn’t have the moxie to bring the two sides together when butting heads is necessary.  We don’t need a professor to run this country.  We need a leader.  And we don’t have one.  And I fear we will not have one as long as Obama is president.

Now, don’t get me wrong.  I understand that the Republican alternatives are worse.  Far, far worse.  And that’s the tragedy.  We have a nation seeking a leader and instead we get a synthesizer of political ideas.  Good for the classroom, bad for the White House.

So my friends, to take a page from the leader we hoped for but will never get: make the peace you want to see.  It won’t be coming out of Washington, DC.  Again, don’t get me wrong.  I don’t see a full peace taking hold merely from disparate communities setting forth their vision of Middle East peace and taking action based on these convictions.  But at least they can set a tone and lay the groundwork for something more substantial.

This is a big victory for Bibi Netanyahu and the nationalist advocates of the status quo.  Israel feels it can maintain the status quo forever.  And it looks good to them.  They will be energized and emboldened by the Obama retreat.  It’s a very bad day for peace.  In fact, I predict a war within 12 months.  It will either be in Syria, Lebanon or Gaza (with perhaps Iran thrown in for good measure).  Palestinians will become even more radicalized realizing there is less hope than ever to realize their state.  This will mean bloodshed.  And I’ve got to say Obama has only himself to blame.  It needn’t have come to this.  He had two full years to lay out a coherent, energized vision of Middle East peace, pursue it, and realize it.  Instead, he went for bits and pieces like a settlement freeze; and when Bibi balked Barack had no Plan B.

I wonder if this is the end of the line for George Mitchell?  What more can he hope to accomplish?

Moskowitz-Kahane Prize for Settler Zionism

Tuesday, December 7th, 2010

moskowitz award spoof 2011

Dr. Irving Moskowitz, bingo king, hospital mogul and settler real estate magnate, today issued a call for nominations for the 2011 Moskowitz-Kahane Prize for Zionism. Candidates must be true believers in Jewish supremacy over all of Biblical Israel and be proficient in Krav Maga and all aspects of AK-47 maintenance. It wouldn’t hurt if they’d killed or seriously maimed a Sand Nigger. Video of candidates dousing hot oil on Israeli police during settlement evacuations is a definite plus. Attendance at a Baruch Marzel anti-Arab pogrom is a must. If you’ve called for hanging an Israeli prime minister who gives up an inch of Jerusalem, you’re our kinda guy. If you are willing to tell the world that the State of Israel can go to Hell and you support an Jewish kingdom governed by strict halacha, you’ve got a shot.

The $50,000 prize must be used to protect our brethren in the Eretz Ha-Kodesh from the filthy, disgusting scum.  Preferably you’ll purchase suitable weaponry to perform your sacred task or else use the funds to liberate formerly Jewish homes currently in the hands of the Unclean.

Past winners of the Prize have included:

Meir Kahane (may a Tzadik be remembered for good)
Baruch Goldstein
Yigal Amir
Julien Soufir
Asher Weisgan
Eden Natan-Zada
Jack Teitel

If you think you have the right stuff, see if you measure up against these Heroes of Zion.

Peaceniks, do-gooders, Arab lovers, Jew haters, need not apply.

We’ll see you at the bingo parlor in Hawaiian Gardens, the engine that drives the settlement train ($150-million worth!).

Thanks to Michael Levin for the artwork.

Israel’s Jim Crow

Monday, December 6th, 2010


I was listening a few days ago to a riveting radio documentary (hear the audio) about the 1950s era execution of Willie McGee, a Mississippi African-American accused of raping a white woman.  McGee’s niece, decades after his death, makes a deathbed promise to her mother, McGee’s sister, to get to the bottom of what happened.  This sends her on a search through archives, to meetings with the judge, prosecutor, attorneys, family members all the while seeking justice for her uncle.  One of my regrets is that Bella Abzug, who defended McGee, was not alive to include her recollections in this account.

A local white reporter remembers that during the trial, McGee was so terrified that he wet his pants at the defense table where he sat.  All the whites interviewed noted it was a foregone conclusion that he would be condemned by the all-white jury, and he was.  He was executed by a traveling electric chair that made the rounds of the rural South for just such purposes.

But was he guilty?  No, not of rape.  When the prosecutor asked him after the legal proceedings were over whether he’d had sex with the white woman, Willie replied: “Yes sir.”  But then he added: “But she wanted it just as much as me.”  So there you have it.  The American South circa 1950 could conceive of and meted out no punishment for a white man having sex with a black woman.  But it could not conceive of a black man having sex with a white woman under any condition except duress.

This was one of the most noxious manifestations of Jim Crow, a series of laws, customs and taboos which reigned for 100 years.  It prohibited African-Americans from voting, and owning land.  It sentenced them to inferior social status when using public facilities and transportation.  It offered little or no public funding for education and infrastructure.  It segregated areas in which minorities could live and enforced miscegenation.  Jim Crow, as I wrote, was codified by law, but also included numerous extralegal provisions.

Under Jim Crow, the South was a democracy for whites which offered inferior roles and rights to Blacks.  The latter’s inferiority was even codified in a founding document of the Republic, which defined a Black slave as equal for voting representation to a fraction of a white citizen.

This satisfies the definition of ethnocracy, which is how many describe Israel itself and its relations between the Jewish majority and Palestinian minority.  Since Israel has no constitution, its racism is not codified.  Many of the injustices suffered by Israeli Palestinians are not written into law.  Rather, they are enforced de facto by government practice which offer much lower funding levels for Palestinian municipalities, worse schools and infrastructure.  Communities are segregated and there is severe social stratification.  Mobility in either housing or jobs is limited.

While Israeli Palestinians can vote, their votes count less since their parties are excluded from governing coalitions, another embodiment of racism.  With Israel’s spoils-oriented parliamentary system, Israeli Palestinians hardly ever receive a cabinet ministry and so offer little in the way of patronage to their constituents.  This is a system mastered by Israeli Jewish parties like Shas, and which the non-Jewish minority will never enjoy.

National leaders of Israeli Palestinians, whether inside or outside the Knesset, are subject to constant legal persecution by the security services.  Almost every MK has been under police investigation and at least one was forced into exile while charges were pending against him which the security apparatus refused to prove at trial.  Other non-Knesset leaders are subject to even harsher treatment and long prison terms.  The charges against them are invariably trumped-up security related offenses which often the defense and always the public has no opportunity to review.

In short, Israel is the American South circa 1950.  Both the U.S. and Israel are nations birthed in injustice: for us, slavery; for Israel, the Nakba. Israel follows the South’s example in being a nation whose laws and customs perpetuate the injustice through racism and enforced inferiority.  One of the few areas in which Israel comes out ahead in comparison is that there are no traveling electric chairs for Israeli Palestinians since the country doesn’t have capital punishment (not that settlers and far-right nationalists haven’t urged an exception be made for their fellow Palestinian citizens).

While some may mistake my motives for writing what I have above, I want to make my agenda perfectly clear.

Until 1954 and even for several decades thereafter the South suffered great damage from Jim Crow.  The damage went beyond what Blacks endured.  The entire region suffered from a backwardness that was more than just moral.  Political injustice contributed to economic and social stratification.  The South had great potential which was strangled by the racism imposed on society by whites.

Look at the contemporary South, at cities like Atlanta.  They are now engines for economic, social, artistic and political progress.  The South is today a powerhouse especially compared to the 1950s.  No longer can it be called a backwater of America.

This is undoubtedly true of Israel as well.  Israel’s minorities are the weak link in the social chain.  Their communities are places where dreams go to die.  Imagine an Israel which unleashed the full potential of every member of society.  Imagine an Israel which offered educational and vocational parity to every citizen.  Israel’s apologists like to point to Israel’s economic success and say there’s nothing wrong there.  But I say success compared to what?  If you stood in downtown Atlanta (or any major Southern ctiy) in 1954 and then compared the landscape to how it appears today, you would think you were on a different planet the changes are so enormous.

Today, Willie McGee’s niece has documented the injustice committed against her uncle.  She knows he died for a crime that does not exist in contemporary America.  I long for the day when the alleged crimes of Azmi Bishara and Ameer Makhoul will be equally unimaginable.  That will be an Israel of all its citizens.  An Israel whose creative and financial muscle will be felt scores of times more strongly in the world than at present.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE