NOTE: My latest article, putting Trump’s attack on Syria into context of Israel’s struggle to the death with Iran, has been published by Middle East Eye. Please give it a read and promote via social media.
Canada’s leading NGO promoting press freedom released a strong statement earlier this month demanding the Canadian government take action to protect journalists in Gaza under attack by the Israeli army, which has killed 25 protesters and independent journalist, Yasser Murtaja.
The murdered Palestinian journalist had been wearing a flak jacket with “Press” emblazoned on it. When Israel’s defense minister was challenged about why a journalist had been murdered, Avigdor Lieberman claimed he was a Hamas commander. Not only did various reports challenge this claim, noting that Murtaja had just received an $11,000 contract to work on behalf of USAID, which vets its contractors rigorously to ensure they have no blemishes which would prohibit their engagement with the U.S. government. A knowledgeable Israeli source told me point-blank that Lieberman was lying.
In response to CJFE’s statement, the Israel Lobby group, Honest Reporting, attacked it and the group for violating supposed journalistic standards demanding non-partisanship and objectivity in reporting. It claimed that CJFE was acting outside its mandate in intervening in a political dispute against Israel. The Israel advocacy group listed all the corporate sponsors of the 2017 annual fundraising event and the Gala co-chairs, some of the most prominent journalists in the nation.
The Lobby also managed to recruit some individuals, actually calling themselves journalists, to attack CJFE; “liberals” all, who of course support free speech. Just not “political speech.”
No, an organization with “Canadian journalists” in its name requesting political positions that have nothing to do with journalism does not advance journalism. That’s the entire issue here.
— Doug Saunders (@DougSaunders) April 10, 2018
Among other things they actually accused the staff member who authored the statement, Kevin Metcalf, of expressing his own personal political views. Lions and tigers and bears, oh my! Metcalf actually expressed his ‘personal’ political opinion that it’s very bad to kill journalists, and that states which do it should be condemned.
When the newly-installed CJFE communications director, Tom Henheffer was asked what was wrong with the statement, all he could muster was that it was “unfortunately interpretable.” Which I suppose means that the Israel Lobby and its supporters in the Canadian media could use the wording of the statement to attack CJFE. Which leads to the question: why be an NGO dedicated to press freedom if you can’t defend press freedom when the going gets tough, in a situation where you’re going to be attacked for doing so?
The attacks were apparently enough to get many of CJFE’s mainstream media board members to run for the hills. Journalists are supposed to be made of sterner stuff. The board chair of CJFE and four board members resigned from their leadership roles. They had no interest in fighting back in the face of the power of the Canadian Israel Lobby. They and their respective media outlets also withdrew their support for the organization. There were discussions about closing down the group. The staff member who wrote the original statement, Kevin Metcalf feared his job was on the line.
At a crisis board meeting last week, CJFE decided to retract the original statement and put Metcalf on paid leave till it could determine his fate. He published this statement about his plight on Facebook. In light of the fact that CJFE has “disappeared” the statement and even removed it from Google cache and the Wayback Machine, I offer it here in full:
CJFE is gravely concerned by the extrajudicial killings of demonstrators which occurred on March 30, 2018 in Gaza. It has been reported that the Israel Defence Force (IDF) used sniper fire, tank rounds and “less lethal” munitions like tear gas during a civil order event on the militarized border between Israel and Gaza. The United Nations reported that 15 Gazans were killed and more than 1000 were wounded. The Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms has stated that among those wounded in the massacre are many journalists.
We acknowledge the fact, as Israeli authorities have stated, that border demonstrations at the “March of Return” in commemoration of Palestinian “Land Day” were disorderly and boisterous in nature. We also recognize that the use of lethal force to respond to boisterous demonstration or civil disorder is an anathema to the principles of democracy, freedom and justice. Similar incidents have occurred in Tunisia, Syria and Ukraine. If similar incidents transpired in 2018, in any other country, the condemnation from the international community would be swift and clear.
Canada is recognized internationally as a close ally of the Israeli state. It is incongruous to profess support for democracy, human rights or press freedom while ignoring the deleterious effect that this repression by an allied state has on these values. Failure to condemn the IDF’s brutality will undermine Canada’s moral authority when condemning similar acts by any other nation-state. Targeted attacks against demonstrators and journalists must be condemned wherever they occur. Canada must speak out to defend universal principles of human rights, democracy and press freedom.
The Government of Canada must condemn the one-sided use of military force against civilian demonstrators and media in Gaza, must immediately call for a cessation of these brutal practices, and must use all available diplomatic, political and economic channels to pressure Israel to initiate a fulsome and transparent inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the massacre, which left 15 dead, and more than 1000 wounded.
A new statement was issued which maintained the criticism of Israel’s assault in Gaza, but withdrew as inappropriate the demand that the government take any action. The board’s position was that Metcalf’s statement violated the mission of the organization and should never have been published. This, despite the fact that Metcalf, who was responsible for CJFE’s communications and social media presence, submitted it to the acting executive director, who rewrote parts of it with him, and then approved its release.
Metcalf’s suspension didn’t last long. He was fired last Thursday by CJFE. It’s ironic that an NGO devoted to freedom of expression would fire its communications director for advocating on behalf of murdered journalists in Palestine; even for having the temerity to suggest that Canada’s government should do the same. Perhaps they should change their name to Canadian Journalists for Partially-Free Expression.
By the way, Israel is ranked 112th in the world in a 2013 survey of world press freedom; out of 170 countries. Not exactly a stellar record. One of the main reasons for this low ranking is Israel’s suppression of its own media (via military censorship and judicial gag orders) and Palestinian media as well.
Some of the excellent pieces published in protest of CJFE’s cowardly cave to the Lobby. Also, Independent Jewish Voices released a statement decrying Metcalf’s “politically-motivated firing.”
Aside from everything else, this is really just another example of the kind of oppressive moral corruption we wind up inflicting on ourselves as a consequence of our association with Israel.
After all, if we maintained similarly friendly relations with — say — North Korea and permitted her a similar degree of influence, exactly the same sort of thing would happen. This is what comes of consorting with evil.
The 112 ranking is from 2013?
@ Craig: 91st as of 2017. Which only means that other countries have become worse, not that Israel has improved.
‘@ Craig: 91st as of 2017. Which only means that other countries have become worse, not that Israel has improved.’
It may also reflect the sort of subtle but cumulative pressure the Israel Lobby exerts on all and sundry to pull their punches lest they be accused of ‘anti-semitism.’
I know little about how the press freedom rankings are actually formulated. At the same time, I suspect that I could go on and on about abuses of the freedom of the press in — say — Iran with considerably less fear of the consequences than I could if I went after Israel’s offences in this respect.
It’s just a thought. I keep running into instances of how one keeps having to watch precisely what one says when it comes to Israel. I can go after China — or Russia, or Burma, or Saudi Arabia — and more or less let fly. Israel? Well, let’s read over this carefully…wouldn’t want there to be anything there I’m not prepared to back up. So maybe the ratings are affected in some such way. Did Israel shut down this paper — or maybe it really did just go bankrupt? Was that reporter doing anything illegal when he was shot? Etc.
@Colin
“I can go after China — or Russia, or Burma, or Saudi Arabia — and more or less let fly.”
You can fly in Russia, fly out the window of a flat!
https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/04/16/russian-journalist-who-investigated-pro-putin-mercenaries-in-syria-dies-in-mysterious-fall
@ elena: Get your news from The Blaze, do ya? That tells us all we need to know about you.
Maxim Borodin’s suspicious death was also reported by the BBC, Radio Free Europe, the Independent and CNN who reported:
I don’t care about who Elena is, but her point remains valid.
@ pea: No it doesn’t. And it’s way off-topic. Nothing whatsoever to do with the subject at hand. I was going to delete your comment. In future, please don’t encourage others to go off-topic with further such diversions. If you do something like this again, I will delete your comment.
I only commented because you impugned the veracity of a well and widely reported story. Had you told Elena (who was responding to a point made by Craig) that her comment was off topic, I wouldn’t have left a comment. ‘Nuff said. Thanks for the explanation.
@ pea: Not at all. I impugned The Blaze as a source and noted anyone using or consulting it has told us loud & clear what her motives are. I knew about the story you both inserted into the thread. I wasn’t making any judgment about the incident. You shouldn’t read your own preconceptions into what I write.
I don’t see the issue.
The guy released a statement on behalf of an entire organization without authorization to do so. He was fired for doing so on his private Facebook page.
Fake news!
@ Jim: Don’t you bother to read? Read my post again, in full. And don’t waste all our time by acting dumb and forcing me to repeat what I wrote:
Kevin wrote a statement. Then he consulted with the executive director. Together they edited the statement. The director then approved it for publication. All according to procedure.
Kevin only posted to his Facebook profile after the statement had been withdrawn & the shit hit the fan. He was not fired for anything he posted on Facebook, nor has any media outlet alleged this.
Fake news, Jim.
Not many wish to face the wrath of the Blindly Pro-Israel groups. Now North Carolina has declared that criticism of Israel, Jews, Jewish/Israeli organizations or groups, is “Anti-Semitic”