The video is my latest interview, tonight, on PressTV speaking of western intervention in the Middle East against ISIS in the aftermath of the Paris terror attack.
In times like these I trot out those wonderful lyrics from The Who’s Won’t Get Fooled Again: “Meet the new boss, just like the old boss.” In tonight’s case we’re talking about the new war against ISIS that western leaders from King Abdullah to Pres. Obama to Francois Hollande have blithely declared. One hardline Israeli commentator went so far as to declare “World War III.” Law professor Thane Rosenbaum blogged this nonsense at the Times of Israel: We are All Israelis Now. Yossi Melman, a veteran Israeli security correspondent, even offered this Dogs of War headline for his article on the terror attacks: To defeat ISIS West must pay the price soldiers returning in coffins. It was later softened to: To defeat ISIS, West must be willing to pay the price with soldiers’ lives.
It’s especially painful when, as George Santayana noted long ago, people who should know better refuse to learn the lessons of history. The west has offered the Middle East no end of pain, blood and sorrow over nearly two centuries of colonial conquest. Throughout this period, countries have regularly decided that they have an obligation to remake the region in their image, to bring civilization or democracy, to modernize. There are no end of motivations, all of which sounded good enough to undertake one disastrous project or another in furtherance of some laudable goal or other.
But I especially want to focus on 9/11. Those attacks by al-Qaeda determined George Bush to launch a never-ending “crusade” (as he once called it in an unfortunate choice of words) against “radical Islam.” He called it, infamously, the “war on terror.” That was the war that Barack Obama told us only a few years ago, was being retired from his political lexicon.
Trillions of dollars, thousands of American lives (and hundreds of thousands of Arab lives) later; and after invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, the region remains much as we found it. Yes, we rid it of some thoroughly nasty individuals like Saddam and Osama bin Laden, but we inspired the rise of others just as capable as them, who weren’t even a gleam in our eye when we first started this campaign. We’ve also offered to the region two states which are arguably less stable than they were before we toppled their former leaders.
ISIS: a Golem of Our Making
We are now beginning to hear about the origins of the recent Paris terror attacks. Claims are made that it commenced with ISIS’ top commander Ali Bakr al-Baghdadi, who directed his operatives in the west to launch multiple “operations” against western nations who had joined in an alliance to attack him. Who was he in 2001? Nothing and no one. But some genius in Saudi Arabia or Turkey who was desperate to counter Bashar al Assad’s massacre of his people in 2011, came up with the brilliant idea of throwing their support behind this Sunni killing machine. Al-Baghdadi was the result. Not to mention, where do we think the fundamentalist theology underpinning ISIS originated? In the mosques and madrassas of Saudi Arabia, the home of Wahabi Islam.
What the west finds is that those who it creates to serve short-term interests can become uncontrollable monsters who take on a life of their own. Like the medieval Golem, the master creates them in an hour of need. But then the servant becomes more powerful than his creator, who loses control. The servant becomes a monster with a will and mind of his own.
That was the Afghan mujahadeen, among them Osama bin Laden, in 1979. It was Saddam Hussein, whom Don Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney armed during the 1980s Iran-Iraq War. For Ariel Sharon, it was the Lebanese Phalange who in 1983 murdered 3,000 Lebanese Muslims in Sabra and Chatilla. Now, it is ISIS.
We create the monster. Then we try to kill it when it goes on a rampage and turns against us. Even if we succeed, new monsters arise from the clay we used to create the first one.
There is no doubt that there are good, or at least understandable intentions behind these original projects. Countries naturally need local allies. But when you create an ally whose sole goal is to be your hired killer, then it can’t end well for anyone, including yourself.
A word now about Israel’s especially pernicious hijacking of the Paris attack. After 9/11, Bibi secretly rejoiced because he knew this was exactly what was needed to draw the U.S. into Israel’s orbit around questions of radical Islam and counter-terror. Haaretz capsulated one of his speeches about the attack as “good for Israel.” And Bibi has milked it for all it’s worth since.
Now, we have Israel’s “brilliant” counter-terror strategists like Defense Minister Bogie Yaalon advising the French to abandon individual rights for the sake of “security.” Just as Israel has long done of course. Not to be left out of the radical Islam propaganda sweepstakes, Bibi says that the killers in Paris are no different from “Arab” killers who stalk the West Bank seeking to spill Jewish blood.
My advice: be careful what you wish for. If you take Israel’s advice you become Israel. You sacrifice the very values which make you distinct as a nation. In America, you throw away the Constitution. In France, you throw away egalite, fraternite and most of all, liberte. I say, if Israel wants to go down this road, we can’t stop it. But if it wants to drag the rest of the western world with it–we don’t have to go along.
The vicious Arutz Sheva cartoon I’ve featured here is emblematic of some of this noxious thinking. In it, an innocent young Israeli chap knocks at the EU’s door offering all manner of beneficial products from Israel for the European market. But the nasty EU border official waves him off. While walking towards Europe is the Muslim, whose sole offering to Europe is blood and carnage, who proceeds shiftily toward his target in the distance, Paris. It’s too bad they neglected to picture the Israeli in uniform, piloting an F-16, and offering Israeli advanced weaponry to the EU cop. That would’ve been far more realistic in terms of the level of damage and lethality of Israel’s export industry compared to that of Islam.
Many messages here, all disgusting. One among many is that BDS is a handmaiden of radical Islam. If you reject Israel you open the door to terror.
I’ve posted this cartoon, despite its deeply offensive imagery, because it’s critical to point out where the overheated rhetoric of Obama and Hollande takes us: it causes massacres and endless bloodshed. No amount of caveats, explaining that we don’t mean to target all of Islam; or we respect Muslims in general, except for the radicals among them; none of this escapes the fact that this nuance easily becomes lost in the heat of battle. Commandos are trained to kill, not parse religious beliefs. If you tell him to attack Islamist radicals, he will make a mistake. You hope he won’t kill the innocent with the guilty. But once you unleash the Dogs of War, they may fail to make the distinction. That’s precisely how you start this vicious cycle all over again.
[comment deleted–off topic. Comments must be directly related to the post. Read & respect the comment rules.]
@ Richard
“For Ariel Sharon, it was the Lebanese Phalange who in 1983 murdered 3,000 Lebanese Muslims in Sabra and Chatilla. ”
Sabra and Chatila were (are) Palestinian refugees camps, and though some Lebanese were killed (mostly Shia, but also some Christians, married to Palestinians), the immense majority of the victims were Palestinians, and they were the ones the Phalanges aimed to kill.
I forgot: the Sabra and Shatila massacres were in september 1982.
@Deir Yassin: Thanks for those corrections.
Thank you again Mr. Silverstein … one of the most insightful essays of someone who understands the machinations how the West duped its citizens and rolled into another deadly conflict. Arrogance of power intil the empire crumbles.
Now it’s possible – White House: Obama and Putin Huddle @G20 On Syria. Even exchanged some niceties.
just as i wrote a few days ago america is in hiding it refuses to authenticate itself with the power.
with great power come great responsibilities. america seems to voluntarily forget the second part.
for obama to say sending troops to take head on isis would not change the underlying cause. this is hiding .
does he not think that syrians want nothing but a a strong shoulder next to them.
until the day the president will lead fearlessly from the chicken coop called congress the world will keep throttling towards undoing.
sad but true and this not only for israel
○ Suspected Mastermind a Belgian National
Involved with the Verviers group, Jewish Museum attack and the foiled attack on the Thalys high speed train in France. Epic intelligence failure …
Allah blinded their vision and I was able to leave and come to Shām despite being chased after by so many intelligence agencies.
Allah blinded my ass … did Turkey intelligence turn a blind eye?
Great read, thank you. I think you are overplaying Saudi involvement and underplaying the effect of camp Bucca prison on the morphing of Daesh from ‘just another small jihadists group’ to the evil incarnate we see today but all in all I like your thinking.
Camp Bucca was the ‘nice’ prison; modeled to be the opposite of Abu Ghraib.
Respect for Islam and civility towards the detainees was the order of the day.
http://articles.latimes.com/2005/jan/19/world/fg-bucca19
Before hastily blaming the United States, lets also remember that Osama bin Laden had never been in prison and had always been treated well by Americans when he came here seeking medical care.
○ Camp Bucca and the Radicalization of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
○ American- run jail, Camp Bucca, a sprawling complex of barracks in the southern desert near Kuwait – a model US regime
On 18 May 2003, U.S. military forces mistakenly released Mohammed Jawad An-Neifus from the Camp Bucca. An-Neifus is suspected of being involved in the mass murder of thousands of Iraqi Shias whose remains were later found at a mass gravesite in the southern city of al-Mahawil.
U.S. Marines took An-Neifus into custody on April 26. At that time they had to rescue him from local authorities who wanted to put him on trial and execute him.
US anti-ISIS Coalition Falling Apart in Syria
With attacks, ISIS now a global worry Interview with Nicholas R. Burns | Harvard Belfer Institute |
I think the United States has to lead this international coalition. It means that we have to intensify our airstrikes against the Islamic State in northern Syria, number one. Number two, we need much greater support than we are getting from the Arab world. Most of the Arab countries that were part of the air coalition beginning in the summer of 2014 are now not very active. The United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia are doing relatively little against the Islamic State because they’ve been focusing on the civil war in Yemen. We need much greater support from the Arabs. They’re the ones, ultimately, who ought to have the self-interest to defeat this organization.
Oui, I agree with you here. The Arab/Muslim world needs to “own” the problem and take greater responsibility for dealing with its own radicalism and ending the carnage in Iraq and Syria.
One can draw an interesting parallel to the civil war in Lebanon in the 80s and 90s. Like the present civil wars, the conflict was a proxy war for various other regional powers, who fed into the fighting by supporting the various factions. Ironically, it was Hafez Assad’s Syria that actually took responsibility by helping negotiate and enforcing an end to the conflict.
@ Yehuda:
The day the Arab/Muslim world actually needs or cares about your advice is the day the Moshiach will arrive…that is, never!
Richard, I think we can confidently make that observation about everything said by everyone here, including yourself. That is the luxury of bantering on a blog, with no real responsibility for making actual decisions.
@ Yehuda: On the contrary, what I say and write here has very real consequences for me, my sources, and those I write about. If you don’t believe me ask Anat Kamm; or Shamai Leibowitz, who served 2 years in federal prison for leaking secret documents to me. Not to mention the prisoners disappeared who’ve reappeared after I exposed their predicament & the Israeli secret police relented (Kamm was one of these). I have very real responsibilities here which I take very seriously, unlike you apparently.
One of your weaknesses is assuming confidence when your views instill anything but…
○ Press Conference by President Obama – G20 Summit In Antalya, Turkey
○ Sweden willing to supply IKEA furniture to solve I-P conflict 😉
Foreign Minister of Sweden, Margot Wallstrom, later replied and said she would be “happy” to send Israel’s FM Avigdor Liberman some IKEA furniture “and he will also see that what you need to put that together is, first of all, a partner.”
Getting back to the topic of the article – (I’m a newcomer here, so please be gentle.)
I just want to say that Netanyahu – in a twist on an old cliche’ – never misses an opportunity to bring up Israel’s ‘victimization’ at the hands of the Palestinians whenever an an act of terror is committed by Muslims anywhere in the world: 9/11 (‘this is good for the Jews’), the Charlie Hebdo case (‘Jews of France, come home to Israel’), and now the Paris attack. According to him, they are all related to the Palestinian hatred of Israel and their covenant to push the Jews into the sea.
I am reminded anew of Bibi’s spectacle in Paris last January, when, uninvited, he elbowed his way into the march of heads of state and at the vigil in the Grand Synagogue. Now, once again, he’s drawing a parallel between an indiscriminate act of terror in France and the uprising of the Palestinians against a brutal occupying military power. “Look, world, and see what we are dealing with, day in and day out. So stop condemning us!”