Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘azmi-bishara’

J14 Tent Protest Movement Israel’s Wave of Future?

Saturday, August 6th, 2011

NOTE: Thanks to readers who’ve expressed concern about not hearing from me for the past week.  No fear.  My family went away for a week to the Oregon high desert where we enjoyed a rafting trip, hiking, and swimming near Bend.  I found it too difficult to both enjoy a vacation and give the undivided attention that is necessary in writing blog posts.  Not to mention that it’s frustrating trying to use an iPad to do all the technical things you must do when you blog.  The world seems to have muddled along while I was away.  But there are important issues to talk about and so I return to the fray.

*  *

For decades I have thought (along with a number of other observers of Israeli society) that the impact of the existential threat faced by Israel in its battle with its neighbors has created an artificial sense of unity within the country.  The result is that citizens who might ordinarily have little in common politically, band together out of a sense of national solidarity.  This distracts the populace from the profound inequities and flaws that lie at the heart of the country’s identity.  As long as there is a perceived security threat, most Israelis are content to ignore the nation’s flawed democratic system, the oppression faced by Israeli Palestinians, the huge income gaps between the wealthiest and poorest, and the ethnic tension between Mizrahi and Ashkenazi Jews.

I’ve always believed (and indeed feared) that Israel could never resolve the social, economic and political problems with which it is riven until it could make peace.  It’s one of the reasons I’ve always supported the peace movement.  It’s also one of the reasons I’ve always despaired that the most basic of Israel’s problems might ever be addressed because the chance of making peace has always seemed impossibly remote.

j14 tent protest movement

Israel's J14 tent protest movement which began on Tel Aviv's chic Rothschild Blvd. (Uriel Sinai/Getty)

That’s why the J14 tent protest movement that began last month in Tel Aviv and spread to all of Israel’s major cities and towns has given me renewed hope.  Not that I believe all the issues of social justice it reflects (decline in standard of living, education and health, high housing costs, poverty, etc.) will necessarily be resolved by this protest; but rather that Israel’s young people who started this movement influenced by the Egyptian youth of Tahrir Square, understand too that their country needs justice internally for its citizens as much as it needs peace externally with its neighbors.

It has “only” taken the foreign media a month to begin to sense to importance of the J14 phenomenon.  Dimi Reider and Aziz Abu Sarah achieved a breakthrough, publishing an op-ed in the NY Times a few days ago, which was the first murmur from the Gray Lady on the issue.  This too stirred the Great Leviathan, Ethan Bronner from his slumbers, impelling him to write a story about the movement in today’s paper.  As usual, his report veers every which way and never provides a coherent narrative framework within which to understand the social movement.  But at least he’s made a foray, no matter how flawed it may be.

All of this, reinforces how critical it is that Israel proceed on a path that addresses both a domestic social agenda and one that achieves long-term peace and security.  As long as there is a threat from the outside, there can never be peace inside.  Once there is peace, there must be a profound examination of the meaning of the State: what is its purpose?  Who does it serve?  How does it operate?  If we think that the violence Israel faces in its battles with its enemies is great, this may be dwarfed by the monumental struggle that is bound to take place inside Israel over the shape of the future state after peace.

I hope against hope that this great struggle to re-define Israel will result in a democratic state which embraces all its citizens equally regardless of ethnicity, religion or class.  This is more or less what happened in the U.S. during the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 60s.  It moved a country that was mired in Jim Crow, segregation, poverty and injustice and transformed it into one that began to transcend the barriers of race.  It was Martin Luther King who helped make American a more democratic and more just society.

Unfortunately, in Israel similar leaders face even greater forces of reaction and repression.  Azmi Bishara, one of the most formidable leaders of the Israeli-Palestinian community was hounded out of the country by the Shabak on trumped-up charges which were never proven.  Whenever a leader arises who might take on a mantle close to the one worn by MLK, the security forces find ways to sabotage him or her.  In a way, this is what the FBI tried to do against King and Malcolm X.  But the Shabak seems far better at the job perhaps because it faces fewer obstacles in the form of democratic guarantees and civil rights.

One senses that Israel’s leaders like Bibi Netanyahu understand the danger they face in retaining power, which is why they would rather fight wars with Arabs than address the domestic ills which lurk just beneath the surface and threaten something like a civil war when they finally are addressed.

Conversely, the leadership of the tent protests senses perhaps unconsciously how fraught the national security issue is and so far has been content to allow it to sit on the periphery of consciousness.  The injustice of Occupation, the enormous economic burden it places on the Israeli economy, settlements, ultra-Orthodox entitlements, all these issues are present but not central to this social justice movement.  For this reason, J14 leaves some Israeli progressives a bit discomfited.  They realize that a movement that addresses only one of these issues and ignores the other, is doing a grave disservice to political reality.  But many of these same progressives also realize that a movement that blazes away at both issues simultaneously might sentence itself to political oblivion.  It’s a very fine line you walk in Israeli politics.

Israel and the Misrule of Law

Tuesday, December 14th, 2010
azmi bishara

Punitive 'Bishara law' criminalizing living-while-Arab

As far as its minority Palestinian citizens are concerned, there is no rule of law in Israeli society.  That’s why I use the term “misrule” in my post title.  There is no democracy for them.  As Rabbi Menachem Mendel of Kotsk used to say in a different context: “there is no justice and there is no law.”

Two shocking developments transpired today in the Knesset.  A new bill passed its first reading, named for that despicable traitor (though neither charged nor convicted) Azmi Bishara which would strip a member of all pension, salary and other financial benefits if suspected or convicted of supporting terrorism.  Let me single out the salient phrase: if suspected of supporting terror.  How the hell do you strip an elected Knesset member of a benefit provided to them by Israeli law based on a suspicion?  If this isn’t one of the more outrageous travesties to be discussed in that Hall of Jackals called the Knesset, I don’t know what is.

And the hate of Jewish members isn’t reserved for Bishara, who is erroneously described in this Ynet article as having “escaped” from Israel (he left with full knowledge of the Shabak).  A Likud member cast derision on a sitting member, Haneen Zoabi and warned her ominously that she would be next:

MK Miri Regev (Likud) answered Zoabi in the same manner she used after the Gaza flotilla: “Go to Gaza you traitor”

…”Bishara is travelling on the axis of evil between Iran, Syria and Hezbollah, he gives them instructions on how to attack us with missiles – and we need to pay him money. There is no country in the world that pays traitors a salary. Our work will not be done until the traitor who took part in the Gaza flotilla isn’t here.”

Far be it from a Knesset member to express thoughts that have any basis in reality.  At the time, there were vague claims in the Israeli media attributed to unnamed Shabak sources that Bishara had aided Hezbollah during the Lebanon war.  One of the really clever inanities they suggest is that Bishara actually scouted out targets and coordinates for Hezbollah gunners.  But there was never so much as an indictment brought against Bishara, let alone a conviction.  He is uncharged and yet this idiot gets to scream utter rubbish from the most august hall in the nation.  Of course, she can get away with this nonsense because she has parliamentary immunity, the very protection she wishes to strip from Bishara and Zoabi, and frankly all Palestinian legislators.

The bill’s sponsor even had the temerity to utter this outright lie in characterizing it:

Sanctions must be taken against every person, without religious racial and sexual or national discrimination who is suspected of breaking the law – and who does not present himself to law enforcement authorities.

What nonsense.  Every Israeli knows for whom this law is intended.  Indeed, Bishara’s name “graces” it.  And we all know who and what he is: Arab.

Though I often find myself disagreeing with Meretz, its leader made a statement that contained what was missing in the entire Knesset debate, common sense:

Meretz party chairman Chaim Oron stood out for saying: “A rapist, a murderer of children and thieves don’t get their pensions taken away. Of all the injustices in the world, the harshest must be the one carried out by Azmi Bishara?

Note, the reporter’s comment that Oron “stood out” for having an ounce of common sense and decency.  The Knesset, I’m afraid to say, has become a house of ill-repute, filled with hatred and racism.  A place in which a majority bays for blood.  Yes, I know a few readers will point out that this is just a first reading and the bill faces many obstacles before final passage.  All I can is thank God for that.  But why does it even have to come to this?

Sorry to say, I’m not done yet.  Anyone here remember taking those Civics or American History classes in high school in which you learned the basics of the constitution?  One of the fundamental rights was the right to an attorney, right?  Not in Israel.  If you’re a security suspect (that is, not even indicted, just jailed under suspicion), Shabak can routinely deprive you of the right to consult your attorney.  Sure, the prohibition has a time limit.  But it is routinely extended, unless lawyers make a big stink as they did in Ameer Makhoul‘s case, which led to him having the unusual privilege of actually meeting his attorney before his conviction.

Well, now there’s a new bill proposed by those wonderful inmates of the House of Misrule better known as the Knesset.  Not content with the Shabak’s ability to run roughshod over the few rights a Palestinian Israeli has, they want to prevent a suspect from being denied access to an attorney for A YEAR!  But it gets worse.  The Public [In]Security minister in this wacky government actually believes that allowing a suspect to meet with his attorney will aid and abet further crimes:

The bill, introduced by Public Security Minister Yitzhak Aharonovitch, aims to keep lawyers from helping their clients “carry out offenses that endanger the security of the public or the state from within jail.”

In other words, the purpose of lawyers isn’t to fulfill the State’s obligation to protect the rights of the accused; rather, the purpose of lawyers is to promote criminality!  I swear, sometimes I feel as if I’m looking over the railing at the inmates of an insane asylum as they throw food, chairs, whatever at each other.  And I say this will great sorrow and no sense of glee whatsoever.  Israel is a country that is near to my heart.  But look what these imbeciles are doing to it.  To paraphrase Jeremiah: how does the nation sit alone that was once welcome among the nations?   A nation of such high hopes and dreams come crashing down amidst hate, fear and authoritarianism.

Remember that quaint concept: the rule of law?  You can kiss it goodbye.  Yoni, we hardly knew ye.

Israel’s Jim Crow

Monday, December 6th, 2010


I was listening a few days ago to a riveting radio documentary (hear the audio) about the 1950s era execution of Willie McGee, a Mississippi African-American accused of raping a white woman.  McGee’s niece, decades after his death, makes a deathbed promise to her mother, McGee’s sister, to get to the bottom of what happened.  This sends her on a search through archives, to meetings with the judge, prosecutor, attorneys, family members all the while seeking justice for her uncle.  One of my regrets is that Bella Abzug, who defended McGee, was not alive to include her recollections in this account.

A local white reporter remembers that during the trial, McGee was so terrified that he wet his pants at the defense table where he sat.  All the whites interviewed noted it was a foregone conclusion that he would be condemned by the all-white jury, and he was.  He was executed by a traveling electric chair that made the rounds of the rural South for just such purposes.

But was he guilty?  No, not of rape.  When the prosecutor asked him after the legal proceedings were over whether he’d had sex with the white woman, Willie replied: “Yes sir.”  But then he added: “But she wanted it just as much as me.”  So there you have it.  The American South circa 1950 could conceive of and meted out no punishment for a white man having sex with a black woman.  But it could not conceive of a black man having sex with a white woman under any condition except duress.

This was one of the most noxious manifestations of Jim Crow, a series of laws, customs and taboos which reigned for 100 years.  It prohibited African-Americans from voting, and owning land.  It sentenced them to inferior social status when using public facilities and transportation.  It offered little or no public funding for education and infrastructure.  It segregated areas in which minorities could live and enforced miscegenation.  Jim Crow, as I wrote, was codified by law, but also included numerous extralegal provisions.

Under Jim Crow, the South was a democracy for whites which offered inferior roles and rights to Blacks.  The latter’s inferiority was even codified in a founding document of the Republic, which defined a Black slave as equal for voting representation to a fraction of a white citizen.

This satisfies the definition of ethnocracy, which is how many describe Israel itself and its relations between the Jewish majority and Palestinian minority.  Since Israel has no constitution, its racism is not codified.  Many of the injustices suffered by Israeli Palestinians are not written into law.  Rather, they are enforced de facto by government practice which offer much lower funding levels for Palestinian municipalities, worse schools and infrastructure.  Communities are segregated and there is severe social stratification.  Mobility in either housing or jobs is limited.

While Israeli Palestinians can vote, their votes count less since their parties are excluded from governing coalitions, another embodiment of racism.  With Israel’s spoils-oriented parliamentary system, Israeli Palestinians hardly ever receive a cabinet ministry and so offer little in the way of patronage to their constituents.  This is a system mastered by Israeli Jewish parties like Shas, and which the non-Jewish minority will never enjoy.

National leaders of Israeli Palestinians, whether inside or outside the Knesset, are subject to constant legal persecution by the security services.  Almost every MK has been under police investigation and at least one was forced into exile while charges were pending against him which the security apparatus refused to prove at trial.  Other non-Knesset leaders are subject to even harsher treatment and long prison terms.  The charges against them are invariably trumped-up security related offenses which often the defense and always the public has no opportunity to review.

In short, Israel is the American South circa 1950.  Both the U.S. and Israel are nations birthed in injustice: for us, slavery; for Israel, the Nakba. Israel follows the South’s example in being a nation whose laws and customs perpetuate the injustice through racism and enforced inferiority.  One of the few areas in which Israel comes out ahead in comparison is that there are no traveling electric chairs for Israeli Palestinians since the country doesn’t have capital punishment (not that settlers and far-right nationalists haven’t urged an exception be made for their fellow Palestinian citizens).

While some may mistake my motives for writing what I have above, I want to make my agenda perfectly clear.

Until 1954 and even for several decades thereafter the South suffered great damage from Jim Crow.  The damage went beyond what Blacks endured.  The entire region suffered from a backwardness that was more than just moral.  Political injustice contributed to economic and social stratification.  The South had great potential which was strangled by the racism imposed on society by whites.

Look at the contemporary South, at cities like Atlanta.  They are now engines for economic, social, artistic and political progress.  The South is today a powerhouse especially compared to the 1950s.  No longer can it be called a backwater of America.

This is undoubtedly true of Israel as well.  Israel’s minorities are the weak link in the social chain.  Their communities are places where dreams go to die.  Imagine an Israel which unleashed the full potential of every member of society.  Imagine an Israel which offered educational and vocational parity to every citizen.  Israel’s apologists like to point to Israel’s economic success and say there’s nothing wrong there.  But I say success compared to what?  If you stood in downtown Atlanta (or any major Southern ctiy) in 1954 and then compared the landscape to how it appears today, you would think you were on a different planet the changes are so enormous.

Today, Willie McGee’s niece has documented the injustice committed against her uncle.  She knows he died for a crime that does not exist in contemporary America.  I long for the day when the alleged crimes of Azmi Bishara and Ameer Makhoul will be equally unimaginable.  That will be an Israel of all its citizens.  An Israel whose creative and financial muscle will be felt scores of times more strongly in the world than at present.

Dungeons of Shabak–Version 2.0 (or 3.0?)

Wednesday, September 29th, 2010

One of the most ‘sensational’ Shabak “spy” (you’ll see why I use quotation marks shortly)  dramas of the past few months has been the “middle of the night” arrest of Israeli Palestinian community activist Ameer Makhoul–with the accompanying arrest of naturopathic pharmacist Omar Said–for allegedly spying against Israel for Hezbollah.  This incident is part of a ritual repeated every few months by Shabak both to cow Israel’s Palestinian population into submission, showing them who’s boss, and also to condition Israel’s Jewish population to suspect the loyalty and trustworthiness of their fellow non-Jewish citizens.  And it works.  Everybody seems to play their part: the Shin Bet parades the suspects and takes credit for protecting the state from treachery; while Israeli Jews (most, anyway) learn the lesson that they should never see their fellow citizens as individuals worthy of respect and equal rights.

Israeli Palestinian security suspects

Israeli equivalent of the 'Commie Bastard' perp walk of the 1950s (Max Yelinson)

Those who follow such security cases will recall that before Makhoul, we had the case of Azmi Bishara, driven out of his homeland by a secret police ‘investigation’-vendetta which accused him of serious crimes without offering any evidence.  The Shabak allowed him to leave the country rather than prosecute him, all the while trumpeting what a villain he had been.  Those with longer memories will undoubtedly remember similar cases that preceded these.  In fact, most Palestinian Knesset members at one time or another have formal police investigations opened against them based on similar, though slightly less lurid accusations.  As I said, they’re about as regular as clockwork in Israel; something akin to the old FBI perp walks of ‘Commie bastards’ in the 1950s replete with short ‘shifty’ men desperately concealing their faces with their trenchcoats and their fedora.

rosenberg arrest

The search for the bogeyman U.S.-style: the Rosenbergs arrest

A few months ago, I reported here on a new case involving Fada Sha’ar, a 27 year-old from the Golan Druze village of Magdal Shams, accused along with another resident of contact with a Syrian “intelligence agent,” who happened to be the Syrian government official responsible for the welfare of former Syrian residents of the Golan.  The man’s father and mother were also arrested and accused of being his accomplices (more likely the secret police were attempting to exert leverage over him as the FBI did by arresting Ethel Rosenberg in the famous 1950s case).

This alleged intelligence agent had offered the boy help in finding a music school at which the boy could study the traditional Arabic oud.  The funding of his studies by Syria was deemed a treasonous act causing irreparable damage to the State.  On return from a break in his studies in France he was arrested for what in reality amounts to practicing a traditional Arab folk instrument.  Of course, they gussied up the case with reports of secret meetings, threats to kidnap an Israeli soldier, etc.

As I wrote above, it’s as if the Shin Bet case officers are fans of pulpy spy thrillers.  They take a real event like the capture of soldiers along the Lebanese border, dress it up with some updated facts and names, and attempt to pass it off as the latest example of Arab perfidy.  What’s laughably ironic is that if these secret policemen were thriller writers they’d be laughed out of the room by their fellow writers: kidnapping Israeli soldiers?  Been there, done that.  Is that the best you can come up with?  But the Shin Bet knows it doesn’t have to come up with anything truly convincing, it merely has to recycle old stories and a populace conditioned to react with suspicion and horror will, like Pavlov’s Dog, do the same when the conditioned response is properly stimulated.

Now, Ynetnews reports that Sha’ar and his colleague have been indicted and accused of being Syrian agents.  As I wrote in my earlier post, read closely the language (the first example below is my translation of the opening sentence in the much fuller Hebrew version; the second from the English version) used to describe the alleged acts of these individuals and tell me whether Israeli reporters are acting as stenographers for the secret police or whether they are acquitting themselves credibly as members of the Fourth Estate:

Yet another connection between residents of the Golan Heights and Syrian intelligence uncovered.

Madhat Salah [the alleged Syrian handler]…operated both the father and the son who were arrested

What was Sha’ar’s crime?  He is alleged to have conveyed $500 each to three Israeli Druze families who have members in Israeli prisons.  For this, the boy is alleged to have received an $800 payment.  Within Israel itself, there is no doubt that there are many settlers who would consider it an honor to support convicted murderer heroes like Yigal Amir or Asher Weissgan with such funds.  In fact, the Israeli group, Honenu does precisely this.  Only when you’re a Golani Druze does such financial aid become an act of treason.

The indictment further accuses Sha’ar of receiving an e mail message from the Syrian suggesting that he kidnap an Israeli soldier.  What did the boy do?  He refused.  And again, for this he stands to lose of major chunk of his life rotting in an Israeli prison system, in which he will become undoubtedly an even more embittered opponent of Israel than he is now.

The problem with Israeli coverage of such security stories is that it acts as a mere cipher for the security services.  Reporters dutifully report what the Shabak tells them.  While they may once in a while use terms like “alleged” or “reported” or concede the story is reported to them by the government, the clear preponderance of credibility is given TO the security apparatus.  Hardly any given to the accused.  You will struggle to find any quote from a source close to the victim.  Not a family member, not a lawyer, not even a Palestinian human rights NGO.  And if they do quote a lawyer he has not even been informed of the charges by the government so he can’t speak credibly on behalf of his client.

It’s all a sad charade of due judicial process.  Even worse, it’s a charade of professional journalism.  In most western media, an editor would not let such a story run without some semblance of balance including a statement from someone representing the victim.  Only in Israel or perhaps nations like Russia, North Korea, Iran or Saudi Arabia, does journalism similarly cozy up to government power.

Only a few hours after the authorities unveiled this indictment, the Shabak trotted out a new set of Arab “traitors.” (Hebrew)  The charges against these are perhaps even more ludicrous than those of our previous victims.  Two Israeli Palestinians, residents of Shifar’am and Umm al-Fahm, stand accused of being unable to locate a weapons cache that was prepared for them near a traffic intersection.  The Ynet report doesn’t even use the term “allege” in connection with this claim.  It says: “the investigation established that…”  It states that this is what happened with no qualifier.  They were supposedly to use these weapons for a terror attack inside Israel.  After being arrested they couldn’t even lead the investigators to the buried cache.  As an aside, do you even believe that a U.S. police force would be willing to appear so foolish as to arrest criminals for possessing such a weapons haul when neither the police or the bad guys can find it??  What do you accuse them of?  Where is the evidence?  Only in Israel can such charges be made to stick in such circumstances.

The accused are also said to have been asked to recruit others to join Hamas and undergo training abroad.  Where?  Well, what nation does Israel need to smear these days?  Turkey, of course.  And did the victims agree to do this?  Even the charge sheet against them concedes that they refused.  Since when do you arrest someone for refusing to commit a crime?  Only in the Land of Oz and Israel.

Maariv claims these guys received $120,000 (Yediot bafflingly claims $200,000) in return their services ten years ago.  That’s right, some or all of this happened an eternity ago.  And yet it’s being dredged up here by the Shin Bet for the first time.  Talk about old news!

To be clear, it is entirely possible that there are Israeli Palestinians who might engage in a real crime of espionage.  I am not claiming there are no such citizens who might endanger Israel’s security.  I AM claiming that these victims are not them.  Further, Israel’s security services are a joke perpetrated on the most powerless, most discriminated against.

Why?  It’s no secret that political tension is at a boiling point both within Israel and the Middle East concerning the peace talks and the so-called “Iranian threat.”  What better way to unite Israel’s population behind its government, military and secret police than stirring up fear of the Syrian menace?  Any general or Shin Bet chief wishing to derail any chance of Syrian-Israeli peace talks need only gin up a little of this sort of mischief to make the public wary.

The only thing missing in these stories is an Iranian bogeyman.  Couldn’t the Shin Bet have dredged up a suitable Iranian mullah offering wads of cash to Israeli Palestinians in return for spilling the secrets of Dimona?  Don’t worry, that may come if things get bad enough.

Bar Ilan Uses Ideological Criteria to Fire Faculty Member

Friday, September 24th, 2010

ariella azoulay

Ariella Azoulay, Bar Ilan teacher refused tenure for political motives


Ariella Azoulay, a distinguished lecturer in visual media and cultural studies at Bar Ilan University was refused promotion or tenure for the third time by the University according to Haaretz.  According to a knowledgeable source I consulted, Azoulay had been promised each prior time promotion had been denied that the University would ensure she would succeed the next time.  My source also indicated that it was common at Bar Ilan when the administration did not wish to promote someone that it would stack the committee with members who would ensure the desired result and that this happened in her case.

Azoulay filmed a documentary, I Also Dwell Among Your Own People, about Azmi Bishara, the Israeli Palestinian political leader.  This in particular is said to have incensed Azoulay’s opponents on the faculty.

Haaretz heard from Azoulay’s supporters:

“The university has no germane reason to disqualify Ariella other than her positions. This is a political decision disguised as a professional one.”

According to people familiar with the issue, Azoulay has been passed over in the past by university committees for tenure and promotion to professor

…”Any decision can be validated by means of regulations and secret meetings,” an associate of Azoulay said. If the university was dissatisfied with Azoulay, “how is it that she has been teaching there for more than a decade? Apparently her activities were unseemly to senior university officials,” the associate said.

…”Few people dispute the fact that Ariella Azoulay is one of the most important researchers in cultural studies in Israel today,” Prof. Yehouda Shenhav of Tel Aviv University, said. Shenhav also noted several recent cases of “persecution of lecturers in a political context” at universities, saying that “this is one of the crudest instances of preferring sectorial considerations over academic excellence.”


This is not the first time Bar Ilan has used blatant political considerations in denying an academic promotion. In 2006-2007, Menachem Klein, one of Israel’s leading experts on Palestinian nationalism, was denied a promotion to assistant professor. In that case, the department chair nominated to the promotion committee those who opposed advancement. But unlike in Azoulay’s case, Klein already had tenure and could not be fired.

He’s about to publish a new book, The Shift, whose political perspective may cause some heartburn in the president’s office. And unless Bar Ilan wishes to do away with the tenure system, there’s little they can do. If they ever decide they do wish to abandon tenure, they’ll have ready-made allies in Im Tirzu to support their efforts.

New Israel Fund Will Refuse Funding Palestinian NGOs Rejecting Jewish ‘Sovereignty’

Thursday, September 16th, 2010

JTA is reporting the final version of New Israel Fund’s new funding guidelines.  When last I spoke with an NIF representative I was assured that the guidelines would not do precisely what these do:

Groups that work to “deny the right of the Jewish people to sovereign self-determination within Israel” will not be eligible for New Israel Fund moneys.

NIF director Daniel Sokatch…said the language would prohibit proposals for a binational constitution of the kind that two NIF grantees submitted several years ago.

“If we had an organization that made part of its project, part of its mission an effort to really genuinely organize on behalf of creating a constitution that denied Israel as a sovereign vehicle for self-determination for the Jewish people, a Jewish homeland, if that became the focus of one of our organizations, we would not support that organization,” he said.

adalah's democratic constitutionSokatch is referring to Adalah’s Democratic Constitution, a proposal for a new Israeli constitution that would guarantee equal rights for Israel’s Arab and Jewish citizens.  The Constitution is NOT a proposal for a binational state.  In fact, the document itself calls for a “multicultural and bilingual” state, not a binational one.  Rather, it is a proposal for a unitary state in which the rights of all ethnic groups are respected and equal.

This is the same Palestinian political activism which caused Shin Bet chief Yuval Diskin to announce that he would treat such Palestinian nationalism as akin to undermining the state.  Further he announced that whether political activity on behalf of the project was legal or not, he would treat it as criminal–and he has been true to his word.

So, in effect, NIF has been cowed and bowed to the will of the state’s security apparatus and defined Palestinian nationalism as unworthy of its financial support.

Sokatch rather lamely appends a ‘clarification’ saying that NIF wasn’t punishing Palestinians for their political views, but rather for their activism:

He added…that NIF would not deny funds to grantees that had philosophical disagreements. The difference, he suggested, was in a grantee’s activism, not in the views of its directors.

Frankly, I don’t have a clue what this means nor can Sokatch if he said what is paraphrased here.  I should add that knowing what I do about the quality of some JTA reporting, it’s entirely possible that the NIF director made a more coherent, articulate statement than this.  But if this is what he said, then it is the lamest, most halfed-assed, confusing statement I’ve read from a so-called progressive organization in ages.  Can anyone genuinely tell me what Israel “as a sovereign vehicle for self-determination for the Jewish people” means?  It’s little more than mumbo-jumbo.

Frankly, as far as NIF is concerned Azmi Bishara’s vision of Israel as a state for all its citizens is dead.  Israel wants a state for its Jewish citizens under which Palestinians citizens are suffered.  Yes, NIF claims it favors equality of all citizens, but it really supports the predominance of Jews in national life.

If Sokatch doesn’t understand that the proposed new Israeli constitution was an attempt to realize the political-ethnic aspirations of Israel’s Palestinian minority and NOT a threat to Israel as a Jewish homeland then he’s either ignorant or worse.  This is my lowest moment in an ambivlent relationship with NIF.  I cannot in good conscience support it’s work when it turns it back on its Palestinian grantees and an entire Palestinian NGO community.  I would urge these grantees to unite and protest this terrible formulation of the guidelines.  I can’t help but think if most of the Palestinian and even perhaps a few Jewish grantees refuse to apply for funding that this will send a shock through the system.

Until today, an NIF slogan graced my sidebar.  In Hebrew it said, “We will not shut out mouths.”  I was proud of NIF for standing up to the Im Tirzu bullies with that statement.  But these new guidelines essentially tell Palestinian NGOs that there are red lines and that they too better shut up about promoting too democratic an Israeli state; otherwise they’ll lose their funding, as it appears may happen to Adalah (if it currently receives any).

What I’d really like to see is a new NGO grantmaker without such constraining ideological blinders filling their funding guidelines.  I only wish I personally had the funding to create such a group.

I would encourage my readers who may have given to NIF in the past not to do so unless and until the guidelines are changed; and instead to contribute to individual Palestinian and Jewish NGOs.  I have lists of worthy ones here and here.  This list was compiled years ago and can’t attest whether every link will be active now.

I would especially encourage you to make a gift to Adalah (as I will) as the initiator of this important initiative to create an egalitarian Israeli constitution with a vision of two peoples living together in a single state.  If NIF is turning its back on Palestinian groups like it, let’s set a proper example and perhaps induce a bit of shame for this betrayal.

Knesset Strips Palestinian MK of Parliamentary Privileges

Tuesday, July 13th, 2010
haneen zoabi

34 Knesset members voted to strip MK Haneen Zoabi of her privileges

Every day seems to bring yet a new outrage against free speech and democratic rights in Israel.  Yesterday, the Israeli police manhandled the director of Women of the Wall, wrested a sacred Torah scroll from her hands, and hauled her off to jail–all for praying.  Today, it only took 34 of the 120 member of the Knesset who actually had the guts to strip Israeli Palestinian MK Haneen Zoabi of her parliamentary privileges–all because she represented her constituents faithfully and joined the Gaza flotilla.  The greatest shame perhaps is that only 16 Knesset members opposed this anti-democratic abortion.

What is interesting about all this is that Zoabi broke no Israeli law in doing so (she might have had the flotilla reached Gaza).  So in effect, the Knesset minority basically said you did something offensive and we will punish you for it.  This usurps the legal process by which the police and attorney general would do their job and ferret out illegality and prosecute it.  It is an entirely arbitrary and capricious act and I hope she will appeal it to the Supreme Court, a body which at times has been known to get off its duff and protect the rights of Israel’s largest ethnic minority.

It should also be noted that MK Zoabi had the honor of a Facebook group created which wished her good health in the form of demanding she be hung from the highest tree for her ‘betrayal’ of the State.  This indicates the robust good health of Israeli democracy.

Knesset speaker Reuven Rivlin is on record opposing the measure which passed, which is a tribute to his sense of the dignity of the Knesset.  However, he is wrong when he warns the right wing Knesset members that once they strip Zoabi, that their privileges and immunity too could be stripped.  He’s wrong because no Israeli Knesset would ever strip a right-wing member of immunity.  The right-wing essentially owns the Knesset and they can act with virtual impunity barring an act of Kahane-Goldstein like mass mayhem.

I have often written here that Israel, instead of a democracy, is a national security state which accords Jews superior rights and Palestinian citizens rights at its discretion.  When it is inconvenient to the State, the rights of the Arab minority are curtailed at will.

The last MK whose immunity was stripped was Azmi Bishara, who was driven into forced exile by the Shin Bet.  Who knows what the rightist MKs have in store for Zoabi next?  There is a campaign to strip her of citizenship entirely and leave her stateless like hundreds of thousands of Israeli Palestinian refugees from 1948.  Wouldn’t that be an irony worth noting?  If I were her I would dare them to do so.  It will only harm Israel’s image and burnish Zoabi’s.

I’ve got news for any advocate for Israel as a Jewish supremacist state out there: “they” have as much right to be there as you (or we Jews, if you prefer) do.  They’re not going away.  You can only deprive them of their rights so long.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Shin Bet Removes Gag, Makhoul and Said Accused of Spying

Monday, May 10th, 2010

Omar Said and Ameer Makhoul, charged by Shin Bet with spying (Itzik Ben Malchi)

Shades of Azmi Bishara!  The Shin Bet has dusted off its “Arab terror” playbook and come up with the equivalent of the failed, but tried-and-true old standard: when you have an uppity Arab who’s bugging the hell out of you but doing so in accordance with the laws of the land, arrest him under secret gag order.  Then wait for the uproar from the usual Commie-Arab suspects, and lower the boom on him with a charge of collaborating with the Arab enemy.  Since Hamas is under blockade, it’s usually easier to charge someone with spying for Hezbollah or Syria.  That’s precisely what the secret police have done regarding Ameer Makhoul and Omer Said, who were each arrested secretly and held in prison for days without benefit of counsel or charges being filed (until today):

The military censor on Monday lifted a gag order on news that two Israeli Arab political activists were arrested last week on charges of spying and contact with a foreign agent from Lebanese militant group Hezbollah.

Omar Said, a member of the Balad movement, and Ameer Makhoul, director general of the charity Ittijah (Union of Arab Community-Based Associations) were detained by the Shin Bet security service and police anti-terror squads.

Makhoul was arrested in the early hours of Thursday morning, Said on April 24.

Reports of the arrests circulated widely on unofficial websites and blogs but government censors had banned the Israeli press from reporting them until the gag order was lifted late Sunday night.

Sayid was detained and his house was also searched, police said. The activist, who also practices alternative medicine, has been questioned by police on several occasions over trips abroad in the past few years.

After a group of foreign and Israeli bloggers protested by violating the gag and naming names, the Israeli kangaroo court and Shin Bet have deigned to remove the gag.  Now they must file a charge and they’ve come up with a grave one: espionage.  This is precisely what they did with Anat Kamm and Azmi Bishara.  I wonder whether we’ll even see a charge of funding terror as they attempted to use against Bishara.

One thing the security goons did differently this time is that they prohibited Omer and Makhoul from going into involuntary exile (as Bishara did) by slapping a travel ban on them before their arrest.  So the Shin Bet means business this time.  They’re going to throw the book at these Arab troublemakers and put them away for years if they can get away with it.

But if the Bishara case is any guide, the security services have at most vague circumstantial evidence which they’ll attempt to formulate in as damaging a way as possible for media consumption.  You can already read the damning headlines in places like Jerusalem Post which have convicted the victim-suspects before trial.  You’ll read lurid claims backed up with virtually no facts.  It will sound bad till you read between the lines and understand that the claims are based on an intelligence agent saying something happened without offering any evidence.

Make no mistake, it is not an espionage case nor a case of a dangerous Palestinian enemy of the state (except as that term is defined by the security establishment).  This is a case of Israeli racial profiling.  Just as blacks are said to be guilty of driving while black, so Palestinians are guilty of being that strange construct–the non-Jewish Israeli.  It’s a concept right wing nationalists like those who dominate this government can’t stomach and would like to eradicate.  They don’t yet feel they can do so in any comprehensive way say, by forced population transfer, so they bide their time and attempt to gradually clamp down on any expression of Israeli Palestinian nationalism.

Ameer Makhoul is “guilty” of being the director of a vigorous NGO which defends the social rights of Arab communities.  Said Omer is guilty of being a pharmacist and member of the Balad political party (which also was Azmi Bishara’s home).  Just as Jews have been accused of having dual loyalties for decades if not centuries, so whenever educated, activists like Makhoul and Omer go abroad to visit another Arab country, the Shin Bet sees treason in it.  Who are they seeing?  Why are they seeking anything outside Israel?  What evil influence are they attempting to import into Israel?

The conclusion of the passage below will tell you how easy it is for the Shin Bet to slap a label of “traitor” on a Palestinian citizen:

The veteran activist is well-known among Arab charities and NGOs and is a regular participant in conference on discrimination in Israel and abroad and has been a virulent critic of government policy.

Unofficial sources say Makhoul was in contact with a number of foreign activists, some with links to groups classified by the government as terror organizations.

Hussein Abu Hasin, a lawyer who has handled several cases of spying charges, told Haaretz that espionage laws in Israel were so wide-ranging that an internet chat or telephone conversation with anyone in an ‘enemy state’ could lead to prosecution.

“The use of these laws has become draconian,” Hasin said.

In other words, Said and Makhoul MAY (emphasis on “may”) have had contacts with someone who may’ve have once had (or still has) some sort of affiliation with Hezbollah.  And the mere existence of such a phone call or e mail message is sufficient grounds to label them spies.

This is the annals of the national security state in which any activity deemed undesirable by the regime can be labelled treasonous.  And a pliant judiciary (in this case represented by the same judge with extensive prosecutorial experience working for the Shin Bet herself, who banned Anat Kamm) plays a willing role in the repression.  Yes, this is what Israel has become.  A parody of itself.  Really, a shadow of the nation many Jews used to worship for its supposed adherence to democratic values and realization of the vision of a secular Jewish state.

The Israeli far-right seems to have got itself into high dudgeon over this case.  The entire time I reported on the Anat Kamm case I hardly heard a peep from them.  But she at least was a Jew.  Now that I’m defending a Palestinian the knives are sharpened.  As I reported earlier, my web host tells me it is very possible I experienced a Denial of Service attack on this blog after Yediot gave Tikun Oalm credit for breaking the gag order regarding the Makhoul arrest.  In addition, the Facebook group dedicated to supporting Makhoul has received an influx of abusive right-wing exterminationists calling for hanging the accused/victims even before trial, even before they know of the evidence.

I don’t know what you call this, but it isn’t democracy.  It’s some sort of state (or at least a significant portion of its citizenry) poisoned by hatred and ready to betray values of democracy in order to impose order and ethnic supremacy on a balky minority.

The farther down this road the intelligence services take Israel the more divorced Diaspora Jews become.  What is this country?  Do we recognize it any longer?  It isn’t Israel as we thought we knew it?  What is it?  The State of Judea perhaps, a settler paradise?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE