Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for February, 2009

Felon Advises Merkin on Fund Management—While in Federal Prison!

Monday, February 16th, 2009

The Bernie Madoff scandal is starting to resemble the gang that couldn’t shoot straight.  One of his chief recruiters and enablers was Ezra Merkin, scion of a leading Manhattan Orthodox family (his father founded Fifth Avenue Synagogue).  Merkin was a board member of Yeshiva University, which unwisely and unethically invested $110 million (8% of its endowment) with Merkin and lost its shirt.  Merkin not only took a management fee from an organization on whose board he served as a volunteer and to whom he owed a special fiduciary responsibility; he turned around and gave the money to Madoff to invest without informing YU that he was doing so.

Things turn even stranger as the N.Y. Times revealed yesterday that Merkin allowed a convicted felon to mange one of his funds WHILE HE WAS IN FEDERAL PRISON.  Not to mention that the felon was barred from involvement with the securities industry as part of his sentence:

But what is truly and hilariously stunning about all this is that Merkin asked the felon, Victor Teicher, whether he should invest with Madoff.  After reviewing the performance of Madoff’s funds, Teicher, the convicted fraudster, told Merkin no one could earn the returns that Madoff was claiming.  In other words, a con artist advised a fellow con artist not to invest with yet a third con artist.  After all, it takes a con to know a con, right?  But Merkin ignored Teicher’s advice, which was probably he only piece of advice from the felon that he SHOULD HAVE heeded.  This reveals more about Teicher’s criminal background.

I don’t get it.  These guys aren’t stupid.  Merkin’s taking calls from Teicher while he’s serving time in the federal pen.  He knows Teicher is barred from doing business in the securities industry.  So why would he endanger his reputation, his business, his career, his livelihood in such a way?  Did he believe the rules didn’t apply to him?  That he wouldn’t get caught?  Did he somehow rationalize that he wasn’t doing anything wrong?

Teicher too is hard to follow.  He files twice with the SEC to re-engage with the securities industry and is twice rejected.  In his applications, he swears on a stack of Bibles that he’s upheld his sentencing provisions religiously.  All the while he’s violating them behind the SEC’s back.  Does he think he won’t get caught even though he’s been caught once before?  Or does someone like this who finds all sorts of rationalizations for breaking the rules, never accept that the rules apply to him as well?

I realize it’s a cliche to talk about flaming ego in this type of case, but these guys seem to think that they’re god and the rest of us are rubes.  They believe that they’re doing their clients a favor in allowing them into their charmed world and sharing their expertise with them.

Teicher is apparently a serious collector of African tribal art.  Given his rather slipshod attention to ethical details and the glut of plundered art gaining media attention these days, one wonders whether Teicher’s collection was acquired professionally and transparently.

In this interview in a magazine called Tribal Art, the interviewer asks whether he displays his art work in his office.  The answer is illuminating in light of the current plight facing Teicher and his cronies Merkin and Madoff:

No. My office is the place I go to make money.  The nature of my business is that I can lose some money over an extended period of time.  Sometimes the losses are a function of the business and sometimes they are a function of making mistakes.  When I’m losing money, looking at an expensive art object which undoubtedly is worth less than what I paid for it seems like another mistake; I don’t need that.

My hunch is that Teicher is going to want to sell off his collection to pay his legal bills and in order not to be reminded of the fortune he lost with his good buddies.  Why the feds haven’t announced any investigation of Teicher’s violation of his sentencing terms is beyond me.

The whole Madoff mess has enveloped the Jewish world in grief.  That one of our own could have fleeced so many fellow Jews and Jewish charities as well.  For those of us who lacked the connections and capital to gain access to the world of the Teichers, Merkins and Madoffs, we are all scratching our heads and not quite enjoying the schadenfreude, or downfall of others, as we otherwise might since so many innocents have suffered as well.

American Jewish Statement Against Gaza War Published in Jewish Week

Sunday, February 15th, 2009

gaza-ad-600pxJerry Haber and I published our American Jewish statement criticizing the Gaza war in this week’s Jewish Week.  As reported previously here, there are nearly 350 signatures including such prominent rabbis and intellectuals as Leonard Beerman, Arthur Waskow, Howard Zinn, Noam Chomsky, Tony Judt, Brian Leiter, Shaul Magid, Chana Bloch and Irena Klepficz.  The statement was the first one by American Jews criticizing Israel’s savage attack on Gaza from  a specifically Jewish context that included references to religious texts and tradition.

Today’s N.Y. Times brings news that Hamas is announcing word of an imminent long-term ceasefire that would significantly open the border crossings and end attacks by Hamas and the IDF against Israel and Gaza respectively.  The ceasefire would not free Gilad Shalit, at least not immediately.  Though one can presume that if it works that this might be the next stage of negotiations.  Israel labels the announcement premature.

It’s unclear how a new rightist Israeli government might impact these developments.  Certainly, a Netanyahu government will have little interest in having good relations with Hamas or Gaza and might feel free to tinker with things in such a way that hostilities could easily be renewed.  That is why our statement continues to be important.

We intend to promote the statement via an ad in the Hebrew edition of Haaretz and are soliciting donations to do so.  It will cost at least $1,500.  We hope that you will renew your commitment to the sentiments expressed by the ad by sending a donation via Paypal.  We still seek signatories who may sign up via this e mail account.

Lieberman May Be Denied U.S. Visa as Former Kach Member

Sunday, February 15th, 2009

Haaretz’s Akiva Eldar brings the bracing news that the Obama administration is contemplating denying U.S. visas to any Israeli politicians who were members of Kahane Chai.  The party is designated by both the U.S. and Israel as a terrorist organization.  The most prominent individual affected would be Avigdor Lieberman who, Haaretz claims, was a party member briefly after he arrived from his native Moldova:

…The State Department is evaluating…reports that MK Avigdor Lieberman, head of Yisrael Beiteinu, was a member of the extreme right group Kach. It appears on a State Department list of terrorist organizations.

If the Obama administration confirms the report that appeared last week in Haaretz, and which was not denied by Lieberman, the Yisrael Beiteinu leader may not be granted a visa to enter the U.S. The close cooperation between Israel and the U.S. on matters of strategy, defense, economics, commerce, tourism and transportation means that ministers charged with relevant portfolios often visit the United States.

A new MK, Michael Ben-Ari of the National Union, confirmed that he had been a member of Kach while it was headed by Meir Kahane and may face similar restrictions.

Clearly, no Israeli government would be willing to include such a person as a senior minister since not only would Lieberman be persona non grata with the U.S. government, he would embarrass the hell out of the government in its relations with others in the international community.

I would like every progressive who doubted whether Obama would make a difference when it comes to his Israel-Palestine policy compared to Bush, to reflect on whether this sort of report could possibly be imagined coming from our former president’s administration.

All of this may explain the Maariv story reported by the Jerusalem Post that Bibi is negotiating with Barak and Livni to form an “exclude Lieberman” coalition.  Though other reports indicate that Bibi is talking with Tzipi, but not Barak, who, at any rate, is likely to sit this coalition out in Opposition.  If Bibi-Tzipi talks proceed, it will be interesting to see what guarantees if any the Likud leader will provide that he is willing to follow the Olmert line in pursuing Syrian peace neogtitionas and talks with the Palestinians as well.   If the guarantees are not ironclad, what use would sitting in a coalition with him be to Kadima?  That smacks of Peresism, a panting after power for the sake of power rather than of advancing any particular political agenda.

My personal hope is that Livni lets Netanyahu stew in his own juice and refuses to join.  This would set up an extreme rightist government beholden to Lieberman and those even farther to his right (if that is indeed possible).  Such an ideologically extreme coalition will have a shorter reign than a more politically balanced one (consider the extremism of Bush-Cheney and how relatively quickly the bloom was off the rose).

To the Lieberman Go the Spoils

Saturday, February 14th, 2009

But which spoils?  It seems highly likely that Bibi Netanyahu will form a rightist governing coailtion with Avigdor Lieberman as his junior partner.  That should entitle him to a post as deputy prime minister along with either the foreign, defense or interior ministry portfolios.  However, there are a few problems that raise their ugly heads: Lieberman has no military expertise to speak of and so cannot realistically become defense minister (note: try to avoid Amir Peretz fiasco).  Since he and his family are under investigation for money-laundering he can’t reasonably oversee the ministries that would be investigating him.  Giving him the foreign ministry would prove a slap in the face to the world community which wants to have nothing to do with his racist, proto-fascist views.

That leaves Finance as a reasonably senior post and he has expressed interest in it (though what experience or special knowledge he brings to it is news to me–unless you count possible corruption charges as evidence of finance experience).  Haaretz reveals that the money-laundering charges involve claims of tax fraud:

M.L.-1 [is] a business consulting firm set up by Michal Lieberman in 2004, when she was 21 years old. She was listed as the sole shareholder, but one of the company’s two official addresses was her father’s house in the West Bank settlement of Nokdim.

…The company received NIS 11 million from anonymous overseas sources in exchange for “business consulting.” Avigdor Lieberman received a salary of over NIS 2.5 million from M.L.-1 during 2004-06, when he was not serving in the cabinet or Knesset, and was thus legally entitled to do so. But the company itself remained active even after Lieberman rejoined the Knesset in March 2006.

The police suspect Lieberman of money laundering, fraud and breach of trust. However, the investigation was delayed for over a year…because of lawsuits filed by Lieberman…claiming that various documents the police wanted to examine were protected by attorney-client privilege. Only after the courts finally rejected these suits were police able to begin studying the documents.

Once again, Lieberman would be excluded since Finance for the same reason he’s excluded from the Interior post.  That doesn’t leave much to offer him that wouldn’t look like an insult to the major electoral victory he won.

I’m so delighted to have Netanyahu face such dilemmas.  When you sleep with rats, you will wake up with fleas.  So to all Lieberman’s other ideological peccadilloes listed above, we may soon be able to add corrupt politician with hand in till.  Israel has quite a bit of experience with this considering the current prime minister resigned after three separate corruption investigations hounded him from office.

In U.S. politics, we usually elect politicians we believe are clean only to find they’re dirty or become dirty AFTER they take office.  In Israel, they elect politicians suspected of being dirty even before they take office.  Nice work if you can get it.  Lieberman looks like he will.

Barak Takes His Marbles and Goes Home

Friday, February 13th, 2009
(Eran Wolkowski/Haaretz)

(Eran Wolkowski/Haaretz)

You’ve heard the saying: “He took his marbles and went home?” Well this is the Israeli equivalent. Ehud Barak dejectedly takes his toy tank home as the other kids (Bibi, Tzipi, Lieberman and Yishai) play with their building blocks trying to form a new Israeli governing coalition.

Love the kids in short pants.  It’s a nice satiric touch.

Ehud won’t be with them because his plan to wage war on Hamas and win an election failed miserably. As a result, his fellow Laborites are telling him that he can’t play in that sandbox anymore. They want to go into Opposition and attempt to rebuild their tarnished brand. Good luck to ‘em. Given how feeble Labor has become it will be a hard sell to revive it.

Dershowitz Calls for IDF Siege of Hampshire College

Friday, February 13th, 2009

Let’s back up a bit. The Hampshire College board of trustees responded to a petition from a pro-Palestinian student group by divesting from one of its investment funds containing stocks of companies benefiting from the Israeli Occupation.

You can imagine how this news will be distorted by right-wing pro-Israel forces. Hampshire College becomes the first U.S. institution to endorse the Israel boycott. Hampshire College hotbed of anti-Israel activism. Anti-Semitism reigns at Hampshire, the pro-terror college. You get the gist. And if you don’t David Horowitz, Charles Jacobs, Daniel Pipes, and Marty Peretz will fill you in.

Dershowitz sounds the call to academic arms against Hampshire

Dershowitz sounds the call to academic arms against Hampshire

Not to be outdone, Alan Dershowitz had to open his big fat mouth and weigh in:

Allen Dershowitz has just called SJP [Students for Justice in Palestine] members and has threatened to start an international campaign to divest from Hampshire College

I think Der Dersh is thinking too small. Clearly, Hampshire is a hotbed of pro-Hamas terror. Why not invite the IDF in to place the campus under siege?  Lock everything down. Search every person and vehicle entering campaign to ensure there is no contraband that could be used for pro-terror activities.

You’ve got to be specially vigilant because they say a Qassam launched from Hampshire could reach Dersh’s home in Cambridge. And I think that in good conscience the IDF should draft him into the army with the rank of at least colonel, if not general. Won’t he look smashing in his IDF uniform with those officer epaulets and that cute beret they give to all the Golanis?  Who better to command the forces in the war against Hampshire than someone who knows the lay of the academic land?

But let’s not stop there. Organize a boycott of every Hampshire College faculty member: refuse to publish their papers, disinvite them from academic conferences, get their grants cancelled, etc. Dersh knows how that game is played since he circulated a dossier on Finkelstein to the entire DePaul faculty. This means war and Dersh knows how to fight it since he’s a street fighter going back to his days beating up little weanie goyim and schvartzes in the old Brooklyn neighborhood.

Oh, and lest you not believe that the Jerusalem Post is written by a bunch of pro-Israel nitwits of the first order read this passage and tell me otherwise:

Asked if the SJP would encourage the college to divest from companies providing similar “dual-use” products in Gaza that assist Hamas’s fighting efforts, Cohen replied, “the bottom line is that we as an institution have money invested in the Israeli occupation. We do not have money in Hamas. So it’s a non-issue.”

Which U.S. companies provide dual use products to Gaza? In fact, since the IDF has the enclave under siege and specifically prohibits the import of any product that might remotely be construed as having a link to manufacturing rockets, how could such products manufactured by U.S. companies even enter Gaza? I mean, really, is this the height of journalistic imbecility or what? Haviv Rettig Gur, you have won the prize for most partisan pro-Israel journalism of the week, if not the month.

U.S. Democracy Double-Standard: We Embrace Lieberman, Reject Hamas

Wednesday, February 11th, 2009

U.S. State Department spokesman Robert Wood…referring to the possible inclusion of anti-Arab right wing Yisrael Beiteinu in the future coalition said “It’s not for the U.S. to make this kind of characterization, it’s the choice the Israeli people made.
Haaretz

Yes, Hamas was elected, but Hamas was also elected to act responsibly, and Hamas has not acted responsibly,” says Secretary Rice. “…They have refused to renounce violence. It’s very hard to imagine a partner for peace that refuses to renounce violence and refuses to recognize the right of the other partner to even exist.
NPR

Thanks to Phil Weiss for pointing out the utter hypocrisy of the U.S., which claims it’s more than happy to accept an Israeli government including racist Arab-hater Avigdor Lieberman, while it refuses to endorse Hamas which won an even larger percentage of the Palestinian vote than Lieberman.

When it comes to Israel, our standards seem to be a bit lower than when it comes to the Palestinians, who must be pure as driven snow before their democracy can be recognized as legitimate.

Foxman, Klein: Tag-Team Apologists for Israeli Racism

Wednesday, February 11th, 2009

I never believed that Abe Foxman had any particular moral principles to speak of. His devotion to fighting anti-Semitism seems, at best, an opportunistic strategem. His devotion to fighting racism seems laughable (what Armenian genocide?). In that context, I find Honest Abe’s response to Avigdor Lieberman’s Israeli election triumph to be of a piece with all his other crass, two-faced posturing.

According to Abe, there’s nothing racist at all with Lieberman’s demand that Israeli Arabs swear allegiance to a state of which they are already citizens:

…The Anti-Defamation League, an organization that is quick to spot instances of discrimination, says Lieberman is right to be concerned about apparent acts of disloyalty by Israeli Arabs.

Abraham Foxman…noted with concern the trips by Arab Israeli Knesset members to enemy states and expressions of solidarity with Hamas by Israeli Arabs during Israel’s recent military operation in the Gaza Strip.

“There were a lot of people who said, ‘Hey, that’s disloyal,’ ” Foxman told JTA. “That’s what he’s talking about. He’s not saying expel them. He’s not saying punish them.”

This notion that Israeli Arabs are traitors to Israel because they visit Syria or Lebanon is ridiculous. They tried to pin this rap on Nancy Pelosi as well when she visited Syria, accusing her of violating the Logan Act, a law no one outside of the Wall Street Journal ever heard of. I note that no Israeli Arab has ever been prosecuted for any of these allegedly treasonous visits. So where does Foxman get off defending Lieberman’s proposal when Israel itself has never convicted an Arab of such “sedition?”

JTA also notes this wonderfully Orwellian quote of Lieberman’s:

“Arabs have all their rights in Israel, but they have no right to Eretz Yisrael.”

How does an Israeli Arab citizen whose ancestors lived in the land that is now Israel longer than many of the current Jewish inhabitants have “no right to Eretz Yisrael?” And if he has no right to the land of Israel how does he have “all his rights in Israel?” The notion is nonsense of course. It’s like someone who sells you a house but tells you the land underneath it will never be yours.  If you have no rights to the land of which you are a citizen then you are lacking one major right without which you are not a full citizen.

But hey, Abe doesn’t hold back regarding Lieberman’s REALLY despicable views:

In 2006, the ADL issued a statement saying it was “disturbed” by Lieberman’s call for the execution of Arab legislators who met with Hamas leaders

“Disturbed” must be Abe’s version of high moral dudgeon. I mean, c’mon, the guy’s done every thing but incite a lynch mob and all you can muster is it’s “disturbing???”

It must feel really good for Abe to be in the same company with Mort Klein, who can always be relied upon to say something nice about Israeli racists and pogromists (he never met a extremist settler he didn’t like). Klein called the loyalty oath a “legitimate” proposal.

What SHOULD American Jewish groups be doing or saying about Lieberman? They should make it clear that a ruling coalition that offers him a major ministerial portfolio is treif, period. And please don’t give me anything about Israeli democracy. There’s no law that says Lieberman has to be defense, interior or foreign minister. If Bibi or Livni are desperate enough to give him such power then American Jews should say: no thanks. That’s not OUR Israel. Lieberman should be ostracized here. If he comes give him the cold shoulder. Let him speak to ZOA. But not to a mainstream audience.

J Street’s statement on the election got it precisely right:

With deep respect for Israel’s democracy, we call on American Jews and organizations that represent them to make clear that we will not remain silent if the prejudice and intolerance promoted by his party actually become part of the incoming Israeli government’s policies and philosophy.

To the extent that the community does anything less than this it is strengthening Jewish racism. Is that how we want to be known? As the community that feted a corrupt thuggish racist Israeli politician?

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE