Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for July, 2008

Judith Miller: She’s B-a-a-a-c-k!

Thursday, July 31st, 2008

Yes indeed.  The nation’s most gullible neocon journalist is back to cheerlead the Iraq war.  Just in case you’re wondering what august nationally-distinguished journalistic enterprise is gracing its pages with Miller’s deeply researched writing, let me spare you the suspense: it’s the Reader’s Digest.  Yes, I know.  The decline and fall from the pages of the New York Times and the embrace of Punch Sulzberger to the Reader’s Digest is sharp and steep–and fitting.

You couldn’t possibly think I would spare you some of the lucid and convincing prose she’s peddling to paint the joys and wonders of the U.S. occupation, could you?  In Iraqi Militants Becoming Citizens, she toots the horn of the commanding general for the former Abu Graibh detention facility (which conveniently is no more).  General Michael Stone, don’t you know, is simply working wonders at transforming hard core Al Qaeda insurgents into model citizens:

Cement walls and concertina wire still surround the two vast camps where nearly 23,000 people suspected of aiding the Iraqi insurgency are being held. But the men, women, and teenagers “inside the wire” no longer languish without hope…

Rather, thousands of once illiterate detainees have learned how to read and write. Hundreds more are now studying math, science, geography, civics, Arabic, and English and learning carpentry, bricklaying, and other skills that may enable them to feed their families after their release. They play soccer and Ping-Pong, visit their families, pray, and debate how to accurately interpret the Koran they can now read for themselves.

Yes, General Stone is a regular Annie Sullivan teaching all those Iraqi Helen Kellers the wonders of their religion and civilization.  But one nagging question bothers me: how do you take an illiterate Iraqi and in six months teach him enough classical Arabic to read and “accurately interpret” the Koran?  Ah, but that’s a minor quibble with Miller’s otherwise clear-eyed analysis.

I also enjoyed this little passage describing an incentive program the general created to promote “good behavior” among the inmates:

They also devised a system of incentives to reward detainees for “productive” behavior and instituted a pledge for detainees just before their release that they would live peacefully and respect the laws of the government of Iraq. They began paying those who volunteered to learn a skill and participate in the camp work programs the equivalent of $1.10 an hour — a considerable sum in post-Saddam Iraq. The money is kept for the detainees in bank accounts or given to their families during visits.

“This is an Arab culture,” says Stone. “It’s all about business.”

It’s also about respect.

Ah yes, thank God for that little bit of wisdom from Stone displaying his deep insight into the Arab mind.  But the real clincher is Miller’s “it’s all about respect.”  Yes, and harboring prejudicial assumptions about Arab culture certainly does show such respect.

Maybe I shouldn’t be so hard on Stone.  Perhaps he is effective at what he does.  But with ideas like this can you blame me for my derision?

Stone generates a new idea a minute — not all of them successful. There was, for example, his flirtation with giving juvenile detainees tie-dyed uniforms, an initiative that quickly died.

I guess he was trying to turn the former insurgents into Deadheads.

If I were really cynical I’d point out programs during Don Rumsfeld’s tenure which paid people to write puff pieces about the Iraq occupation.  Miller’s piece is so puffy and so lacking in rigor, evidence or specificity you can’t help but wonder whether there was some under the table scheme involved in writing or publishing it.  But Judy Miller doesn’t need to be paid to whore for the Bush Administration.  She does it for free.

The kicker for me is this bio of Miller at the end of the story:

Judith Miller is a journalist and contributing editor to the Manhattan Institute’s City Journal.

The Manhattan Institute is New York headquarters for the neocon mafia.  If you’re a right wing New York intellectual who doesn’t want to move to DC to work at the Heritage Foundation or American Enterprise Institute, you’ll end up at the Manhattan Institute.  One of its founders was “Wild Bill” Casey, Ronald Reagan’s top spook and a mastermind behind the Iran Contra initiative. Whatever you say about Judy Miller, she’s ended up where she belonged all along.

I just can’t wait for her book.  That should be something.  What I’d love to see would be a literary collaboration between Judy and Scooter, a romantic thriller about a powerful, manly key aid to the v.p. and a dashing journalist misunderstood by her editors and everyone but the manly man she loves.  They pursue hair-raising adventures around the globe to protect everything that we hold dear in western civilization.  That too would be something.

Thanks to my old friend, Mike Rose, whose grandparents of blessed memory bought him a lifetime (yes, lifetime) subscription to Reader’s Digest when he was born.  Just think, if not for that Mike never would’ve read this and I would never have brought it to your attention.  Can you think of a greater tragedy?

Maariv Sinks into Gutter, Publishes Obama’s Kotel Note

Thursday, July 31st, 2008

This incident happened while I was visiting my brother in Oregon and I didn’t find out about it till my return, when I read an e mail from reader Dan Sniderman, who pointed me to this post at The Field Negro. Dan and I both agree that it was a disgrace for Maariv to publish Obama’s personal petek, placed reverentially by him among the stones of the Kotel.

Maariv's journalistic 'coup'

Maariv's journalistic 'coup'

Apparently, even yeshiva bochers at the Kotel have become the equivalent of Jewish paparazzi because one stalked Obama, searched through other p’takim till he found Obama’s and then shopped it to Yediot and Maariv, among others.  It reminds me of desperate celebrity stalkers who rummage through stars’ trash for something salacious enough to be salable to the tabloid press.  Thankfully, it was beneath Yediot’s dignity to bite on this journalistic fish. But Maariv, having no scruples to speak of, gobbled the morsel up and regurgitated it for its readers.

What I find especially repellant about Maariv’s “defense” of its actions are the lies and Judaic supremacism that characterized its response.  This is how the Jerusalem Post reported the story:

…A Ma’ariv spokesman said that “Barack Obama’s note was approved for publication in the international media even before he put in the Kotel, a short time after he wrote it at the King David Hotel in Jerusalem. In any case, since Obama is not a Jew, publishing the note does not constitute an infringement on his right to privacy.”

Obama’s campaign…made clear that the campaign hadn’t approved the publication of any kind of prayer note.

“Prayer notes at the Wall should remain private,” a campaign aide said.

The paper added that is was “pleased” with its “journalistic accomplishment.”

Either the Maariv spokesperson was woefully misinformed about the Obama note being approved for publication or he was simply lying with impunity.  Either possibility is simply disgraceful journalistic practice.

I also find especially noxious the idea that since Obama is Christian and therefore not fulfilling any religious commandment in praying at the Kotel, that stealing his petek is somehow permissible.  Have we Jews come to the point that we justify unethical behavior by denying that non-Jews have rights when they enter our holy sites?

In addition, you know that the thief also justified his actions to himself using the same rhetoric: it’s not theft since Obama isn’t Jewish and victimizing a goy is permissible.  If that doesn’t bring Orthodox Judaism, or at least this particular practitioner of it, into disrepute I don’t know what will.

Gershom Gorenberg notes that a New Republic writer typically attempted to besmirch Obama’s alleged involvement in this episode only to find yet another Maariv spokesperson who denied the first spokesperson quoted in the Jerusalem Post, existed:

…The accusation [that the Obama campaign released the note] is “completely false,” and that he has no idea who these papers were quoting from Ma’ariv. “No official spokesman for Ma’ariv told this to any of the papers.”

You’ll note the phrase “no official spokesperson.”  That provides a loophole big enough to drive a truck through since I presume they would claim someone speaking off the record was not an official spokesperson.  But does Maaariv seriously expect us to believe that the Post simply made up the quotation?

I really like this laugher of a phrase from TNR’s blogger describing Maariv:

Though Ma’ariv is one of Israel’s most prominent newspapers, there is certainly reason to question its motives regarding this story…

There are a lot of adjectives I’d use to describe Maariv, but “most prominent” would not be one of them: ‘scurrilous’ perhaps, ‘slutty,’ ‘tabloid journalism.’  They all fit.  But not “most prominent.”  The fact that someone at TNR considers Maariv so tells you a lot about TNR and its standards.

Olmert Resigns

Wednesday, July 30th, 2008
Olmert's resignation bowed to the inevitable

Olmert's resignation bowed to the inevitable

Ehud Olmert bowed to the inevitable yesterday and resigned as Israeli prime minister effective September 17th, the date of the next Kadima party leadership primary.  Beset on all sides by up to six separate corruption investigations, the most serious of which involved accepting several hundred thousand dollars in cash and gifts from U.S. businessman Moshe Talansky, Olmert realized that his continued leadership was untenable.  In addition, he had little political credibility or traction with the nation because of both his ethical lapses and his failed prosecution of the 2006 war in Lebanon.

There were several options that Olmert could have chosen in resigning and the one he picked will send the Kadima party into a flurry of political jockeying before the primary elections.  The leading candidate is centrist foreign minister Tzipi Livni, who has made a name for herself as a political pragmatist, though she comes from a prominent rightist political family.  She pointedly departed from Olmert during the Lebanon war and refused to participate in promoting or defending it, a surprisingly independent move for a sitting foreign minister.  Her chief challenger is transportation minister, former IDF commander in chief and hawk Shaul Mofaz.  It was Mofaz who single-handedly caused a multi-billion dollar rise in the international price of oil a few weeks ago, with his statement that Israel faced no choice but to attack Iranian nuclear installations.  The latest polls (which are inherently unstable in Israeli politics) show Livni with a significant but falling lead over Mofaz.

The political instability Olmert caused with his resignation portends well for the possible political comeback of perennial prime minister candidate Bibi Netanyahu, leader of the rightist Likud opposition.  Should the Kadmina-led coalition falter, Netanyahu eagerly waits in the wings for his second opportunity to lead the nation.  His first prime ministership was marked by a hardline approach to the Israeli-Arab conflict and an unwillingness to negotiate over major issues dividing the parties.  He also has a reputation as a fiscal hawk willing to restrain spending on Israel’s safety net for its large population of poor, unemployed and ultra-Orthodox Jews.  When he served as finance minister his policies were known for fiscally punishing the most vulnerable of Israel’s citizens.  Current polls show that if a new election were held now Netanyahu would become prime minister.

Naturally, this is something Kadima and its junior coalition partner, Labor, seek to prevent at all costs.  But the current government is a fragile reed including multiple parties each with its own separate social and political agenda.  It remains to be seen whether the new party leader can hold together these disparate elements.

The biggest casualty in Olmert’s downfall may be his various peace initiatives initiated as his political career entered its most unstable phase.  He began third party peace talks with Syria brokered by Turkey several months ago.  With great willingness by both sides to compromise, it appeared that such talks might bear fruit in a relatively short period of time.  More complicated and less productive have been U.S.-mediated talks with Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas.

If there are national elections and Netanyahu wins, each of these negotiating tracks may fall victim to his assumption of the reins of power.  He is known as a deep skeptic regarding the possibility of peace with the Arabs and as a booster of military power as the key to national security.

Olmert’s downfall marks the end of the career of one of Israel’s veteran political operatives whose own career began in the early 1970s.  He helped end the career of beloved long-time Labor party Jerusalem mayor Teddy Kollek and used the mayoral perch to launch himself into national political leadership.  After joining the Knesset, he became Ariel Sharon’s chief political aide and enforcer.  When Sharon wanted to lower the boom on then Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, it was Olmert who told the Jerusalem Post that Israel was prepared to assassinate him.  A later report by a journalist-confidant of Sharon’s published in Haaretz, claimed that Sharon, and Israeli intelligence, had indeed been responsible for Arafat’s death.

Olmert was known throughout his career as a wily, but pragmatic political survivor willing to compromise his rightist principles for either his own advancement or achieving political goals.  His supporters and critics, for example, could never tell whether his recent peace initiatives toward Syria and the Palestinians were the product of principle or an attempt to save his prime ministership.  For this reason, he leaves a mixed legacy of a man who seemed to have some vision of compromise with Israel’s enemies, but who allowed his penchant for the good life to interfere with, and ultimately topple him.

J Street Endorses Wexler, TNR’s Kirchick Falls Flat on His Face

Wednesday, July 30th, 2008

JStreetPAC Endorses…Wexler

–JStreetPAC press release (pdf)

Nothing pleases me more than watching TNR fall flat on its face in covering American Jewish politics.  And TNR’s James Kirchick has done a magnificent pratfall for all to see in his July 25th blog post, Nightmare on J Street.  The piece drips with sarcasm and barely contained contempt towards J Street and its director, Jeremy Ben Ami.  I especially like this quotation from key AIPAC operative, Steve Grossman:

Steve Grossman, former AIPAC president…told me that he “would question whether any aspiring American political leader in either party…would ever take funds from an organization a part of whose centerpiece philosophy is unconditional negotiations with Ahmadinejad or Hamas.”

Then Kirchick points to an alleged J Street gaffe, in which the group mistakenly stated that Bob Wexler had withdrawn his co-sponsorship of the House’s “declare war on Iran” resolution (HR 362).  Here’s the money quote from Kirchick:

I guarantee that neither representative [Wexler or Barney Frank] will be accepting a J Street endorsement this fall…

It looks like Kirchick, TNR and Grossman have egg on their face now.  It couldn’t have happened to a more deserving bunch.  Read the TNR comment thread for Kirchick’s post.  It’s entertainingly savage.  If this is what TNR readers think of him it makes you wonder how he can hold onto his job unless of course he’s Marty Peretz’s darling, which is eminently possible.  [UPDATE: Eric Alterman reveals that he is actually Peretz's "personal assistant."  Alterman hilariously calls him Peretz's "mini-Me."]

Syrian Ambassador Tells Israel: We are Gatekeepers to Peace With Arab World

Wednesday, July 30th, 2008
Syrias U.S. ambassador, Imad Moustapha

Syria's U.S. ambassador, Imad Moustapha

Ori Nir, communications director of Americans for Peace Now, interviewed Imad Moustapha (audio), Syria’s U.S. ambassador, about the current Syria-Israel peace negotiations being brokered by Turkey.  Moustapha made an impressive pitch that confirmed the seriousness of the talks and of Syria’s commitment to their success.  Here he makes the case that Syria not only holds the key to peace on Israel’s northern border, but with other Arab nations as well:

Syria plays the role of the gatekeeper between Israel and the rest of the Arab world.  If Israel wants to make peace with the Arab world, Israel needs to understand this legitimate demand based on the premise of land for peace.

One might quarrel with this assessment and say that he’s overstating Syria’s importance.  But when you realize that Syria holds the key to the involvement of so many players including Hezbollah, and by extension Lebanon, and even Iran, his claim becomes somewhat more credible.

Nir asked Moustapha why U.S. involvement in the talks is so important to his country.  The ambassador replied that he doesn’t expect the U.S. to become involved in the nitty gritty of the negotiations.  But its role would be to help “provide guarantees” and “help create momentum” that would lead to negotiating and signing an agreement.  Because Syria understands that such peace negotiations would lead to a “new paradigm” in relations among the front line states, U.S. engagement is critical to ensure the success of such a transition.  He means that if Syria is to turn away from current alliances with Hezbollah and Iran, that Syria will expect the U.S. to “pick up the slack” by opening trade, restoring relations, and even guaranteeing Syria’s security if attacked by any of its enemies or former friends.

In answer to a question about whether Syria sought a “re-alignment” in relations with the west, Moustapha confirmed that it did:

Syria has always wanted to open up to the west and in partnership with the European Union and to have the best possible relations with America.  We are not enemies to the United States.

…We…are telling the state of Israel that we desire to end the state of war between us, to conclude peace between two states, to recognize each other and to live as peaceful neighbors with each other, within a normalized context. We think this is a very serious proposal (…) here is the grand thing on offer: let us sit together, let us make peace, let us end once and for all the state of war…

Of course, there are Syria-skeptics both in the Bush Administration and among Israeli rightists.  Which is why the following comment from an Israeli academic expert on Syria reinforces the gravity of what Mustapha has to say in this interview:

“These are the most progressive and helpful comments I have heard ever from Moustapha, and I know him quite well and follow what he says all the time,” said Moshe Maoz, a professor of Islamic and Middle Eastern studies at Hebrew University.

For anyone hoping for peace between Israel and Syria, your November vote is critical.  You have one candidate who will energetically push forward such negotiations and another candidate wedded to the discredited policies of the current Administration.  How can anyone be sure what John McCain’s position will be regarding Syria-Israel peace talks given his closeness to Bush’s core Mideast policies?  And given the critical importance of peace to Israel’s well-being, can we entrust such a U.S. role to a president whose views are unclear on the subject?

Thanks to Dan Fleshler for first blogging this story which has also been reported by Haaretz and Bloomberg.

Jonah’s ‘City and Trains’

Tuesday, July 29th, 2008

City and trains (Jonah Silverstein

City and trains (Jonah Silverstein


This is one of Jonah’s latest drawings. The green building is an art museum. The red cars are trains cars moving toward the train station (next to the museum). You’ll also notice a glass conservatory for displaying plants on top of the building housing a clothing store (to the left of the train station).

Tikun Olam’s Alexa Ranking 189,000

Saturday, July 26th, 2008

I’m about to take off a few days from blogging and wanted to take care of a few housekeeping matters before I left.  I should resume on Monday.

The Guardian’s Comment is Free published today, Who Speaks for American Jews, an expanded version of my post about the J Street poll on American Jewish attitudes toward Israeli-Palestinian peace and presidential politics.

Bloggers, no matter how successful, always wish they had more readers and more visibility.  That goes for the blogger with 100 readers a day and the one with 100,000 a day.  It goes for me as well.  Ever since I started this blog, I’ve been very aware of who was reading and how many were reading.  There are a lot more now than there were way back in the Ice Age of 2003 when I started.  To me, this isn’t just a reflection on me, what I write or how well I write–it’s a reflection of the strong resonance of the issue of Middle East peace within the Jewish community.

Another aspect of the reach of this blog and its message is my weekly gig at Comment is Free and my blogging at Huffington Post which each began in the past few months.  I’m also looking forward to the publication in September of A Time to Speak Out, which contains one of my essays.  I’m hoping in the coming year to expand my publications to other media sources.  I knock on many doors though relatively few are opened.

I spend a good deal of time reviewing my site stats, Google Analytics and other ranking sites like Alexa.  I’m really pleased to report that Alexa ranks this blog at 189,000 which is quite good for a specialized blog of this nature.  Many website owners will tell you that none of the site ranking services provide entirely credible data, so I’m not taking this ranking as torah l’moshe mi’sinai (“divine truth”).  But it is an indication of the size of readership.

As a comparison with other similar sites (ones I like and ones I don’t), Mondoweiss is ranked 153,000 (kol hakavod l’cha, Phil), Jewschool 449,000, Jewlicious 292,000, Israellycool 341,000.  The Forward is ranked 101,000, Haaretz (English) 5,900, Jewish Week 215,000, Tikkun Magazine 733,000, and JTA 76,000.

As I wrote above, for the sake of advancing the message of peace I hope you’ll do what you can to introduce your friends, colleagues and family who may be interested in this subject to Tikun Olam.  When you read something that you like here, tell a friend.  The greater our community the stronger our message of peace.  I am grateful to other bloggers who link to my work here.  This is especially important in building an online presence.

Also, consider sharing these posts (using the ShareThis icon at the end of each post) with any social bookmarking sites you may frequent (StumbleUpon, Facebook, Reddit, etc.).

Finally, this is a labor of love and I certainly don’t do it for the money.  But contributions from readers are gratefully appreciated:

If you shop through Amazon, anything you buy there (as long as you go there from Amazon links at this site–again, see sidebar) earns a small commission–also appreciated.

Obama, Omigosh, Blames BOTH SIDES in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict!

Wednesday, July 23rd, 2008
Obama prays (for I-P peace?) at Kotel (Paul J. Richards/AFP-Getty)

Obama prays (for I-P peace?) at Kotel (Paul J. Richards/AFP-Getty)

The Republican National Coalition has fired up both burners of their fax machine no doubt to inform the Jewish world of Barack Obama’s “perfidy” towards Israel and the Jewish people.  His sin?  He actually said BOTH SIDES were responsible for the impasse in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.  Imagine that?  He didn’t say Israelis were saints and Palestinians demons as any right-thinking presidential candidate and AIPAC supplicant should do.

Here’s how Ben Smith reports it:

In Amman today, though, he suggested again that the fault in the region is not the Palestinians’ alone, something you’ll rarely hear from Republicans.

“It’s difficult for either side to make the bold move that would bring about peace,” he said, noting (generously) that the weak, scandal-tarred, deeply unpopular Israeli government is “unsettled,” while the Palestinians are “divided.”

There’s a tendency for each side to focus on the faults of the other rather than look in the mirror,” he said.

Obama condemned today’s attack in Jerusalem, but he also cast it in tactical terms: “That’s why terrorism is so counterproductive as well as being immoral,” he said. Attacks make “the Israelis simply want to dig in and think about their security … the same would be true of any people when these kinds of things happened.”

And he stressed the role the desperate Palestinian economic situation plays in continuing the conflict.

“What I think can change is the ability of a United States government and a United States president to be actively engaged in the peace process,” part of which is to “recognize the legitimate difficulties that the Palestinian people are experiencing right now,” something he said would be “also in the interest of the Israeli people.”

These are differences of nuance, not dramatic ones…

Nonetheless, pro-Israel politics in this country is a game of inches and nuance.  The fact that Obama has made such a careful and mutually sympathetic statement about the suffering of both sides speaks volumes about the kind of president he will be (and John McCain won’t be).

And thank God, Obama didn’t make the same mistake he did at the AIPAC conference when he used right-wing nationalist phraseology to characterize Israel’s eternal claim to Jerusalem:

A controversial statement last month from Mr. Obama that Jerusalem should remain Israeli and undivided was raised by Israeli reporters, but did not come up in public statements from officials. Mr. Obama said Jerusalem should be the capital of Israel, but added, “It is not the job of the United States to dictate the form in which that will take.”

This is precisely what a president who is a real leader (as opposed to cheerleader) should say.

And when you hear the Republican war machine rev up the their anti-Obama engines with the “soft on Israel” claim just remember that not only do the majority of Americans want a foreign policy that is sympathetic, but balanced toward both parties; the majority of Jewish opinion wants that as well.

What concerns me is that with only 62% of the Jewish vote in the latest polls, AIPAC, ZOA, the RJC, and the Israel lobby may be able to plant enough doubt in peoples’ minds that they turn away from him in sufficient numbers to throw the election to McCain.  In the last three elections won by Democrats, Clinton won by 78% and 80% and Carter won by 71%.  70% seems to be an important threshold and Obama isn’t there yet.

And if this chnyuk (roughly, “ignoramus”) who taunted Obama at the Kotel has anything to say about it, Obama won’t ever get there:

The moment unfolded as a lone man standing about 10 yards away yelled over and over, “Obama, Jerusalem is not for sale! Obama, Jerusalem is not for sale!”

So we have to ask the question: are we going to appeal to the better angels of our Jewish nature come November; or are we going to live by our fears and paranoia?