Haaretz Removes Report that Netanyahu Pressured Japanese Regulators to Approve Adelson Casino Bid
Yesterday, Uri Misgav published a bombshell in Haaretz saying that during Bibi Netanyahu’s state visit to Japan last spring, he approached a senior Japanese official, asking that he help expedite Sheldon Adelson’s application for a Japanese casino license. According to the report, the Japanese official was shocked and dismissed the request out of hand. Bibi’s approach was perfectly timed, following by only three months the Sands’ application to open Japan to legalized gambling (which is currently illegal).
What’s astonishing about this is not just the actual report, which is shocking enough, but what happened to it once it was published. It first appeared in the Hebrew edition last night and a few hours later it was published in the English edition. But shortly afterward, both disappeared from the Haaretz site. But not before I captured screenshots of both (the English is displayed here and the Hebrew is cached here) and not before other foreign publications published their own knock-offs of the story.
So now the horse is out of the barn and the lawyers who threatened Haaretz have done nothing more than magnified interest in the story. We might hazard a guess as to whose lawyers visited Amos Schocken today and what they said. My suspicion is that it was Adelson’s. He’s already sent lawyers to Channel 10, after it aired an unflattering documentary about Adelson’s litigious past. In response, the Channel broadcast an unseemly on air apology which led to the resignation of the news director.
So we know that Adelson believes in flexing his muscle, especially when the target is a “leftist” Israeli newspaper gunning for his Golden Boy Bibi.
UPDATE: Walla! says that the Prime Minister’s Office complained to Haaretz and the paper decided to remove the story till it received a formal legal opinion from counsel. In my experience (and I’ve had some believe me), when an editor tells you a lawyer’s needed to vet a story it’s a sure-fire way to know your piece will never see the light of day.
Eldad Yaniv, an Israeli anti-corruption activist, wrote on his Facebook page that he requested that the state attorney general open an investigation to determine if Bibi broke any laws in approaching the Japanese on Adelson’s behalf. Yaniv claims that Bibi, frightened of a potential police investigation, did all in his power to silence the story, including threatening a lawsuit. I have independently confirmed that Bibi’s lawyers were involved.
An interesting legal question is: is it permissible for a prime minister to lobby a foreign government on behalf of someone who is not an Israeli citizen and whose main business interests are not in Israel? Adelson is a U.S. citizen and does not have Israeli citizenship.
Another interesting aspect of Misgav’s report is that he asked the entirely apt question: for whom does Bibi work? The Israeli people? Or Sheldon Adelson? Of course, to Adelson, they are one and the same. But is it in the interest of the Israeli people for the Sands to gain control of the Japanese gambling market?
I think back to the days after military service when Bibi went into the home furnishings business (when he wasn’t off on assignment for the Mossad, that is). Is he now anything more than a glorified mattress salesman?
Who might the source for this anonymous story might be? The choices are varied: Japan (unlikely), a disgruntled former aide, or the NSA. As far-fetched as the latter may seem, that agency spies regularly on the communications of U.S. allies (Brazil, Germany, among others). It’s conceivable it eavesdropped on Japanese diplomats as well. If so, Obama certainly has plenty of motivation to torpedo Adelson’s casino bid while wounding a second Bibi-bird with the same stone.
11 thoughts on “Haaretz Removes Report that Netanyahu Pressured Japanese Regulators to Approve Adelson Casino Bid – Tikun Olam תיקון עולם إصلاح العالم”
Comments are published at the sole discretion of the owner.
@Richard “Who might the source for this anonymous story might be?” – with the amount of exaggerated or purely made up information on Israeli media these days, I won’t be surprised if the sole source is the journalist’s butthole.
Surely you meant to say – the journalist’s holy butthole.
I would have thought that the source boils down to these two choices:
a) Harel Locker or Eugene Kandel witnessed the exchange
b) …”He was so astonished that already during the visit he told his associates about the Israel prime minister’s request”…
After all, the reporter didn’t really need to include either reference in order to make his point.
@ Yeah, Right: I too thought of Kandel or Locker. I’ve asked an Israeli friend whether either has had a falling out with Bibi since that visit to Japan. As for the Japanese, one of them would’ve had to tell someone in the Israeli visiting delegation or the Israeli ambassador in order to get the message back to Misgav. It’s quite indirect, but still possible.
Fantastic. Richard, were your screenshots made as a matter of routine, or did you accurately sense that Haaretz would pull the story?
no, ckg, he made the screenshots then ordered Ha’aretz to pull the story so he could write this post. that’s just what omnipotent, duplicitous, self-hating journalists do. I don’t get your point though. Are you suggesting that Ha’aretz didn’t ‘pull the story’ or that the screenshots are spurious (either of which you could probably prove on your own, if true, with a little internet sleuthing). or are you just being a dink?
are you sober?
I see. Just being a dink.
My Israeli partner will often take screenshots pre-emptively in fear of just this sort of thing happening. But in this case, as soon as I heard the articles had disappeared I already had them open in my browser & copied them to preserve them.
Richard – would you please write about Schabas resignation. It is the big elephant in the room that I’m surprised you haven’t write about yet. Shabbat Shalom
@ Ariel: Better yet, start your own blog & write your own post. I write what interests me. If I don’t write on a subject you can guess why.