Muslim and Jewish Women in Nazareth

'We can live in peace'...John Lennon (photo: Dafna Tal)

Mahzor

Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for the ‘Jews & Judaism’ Category

Netanyahu Proposes Israeli Expatriates Vote

Monday, February 8th, 2010

Lieberman, democrat in wolf's clothing

I wanted to be conservative in my choice of blog title, but Dimi Reider really said it as it should be: Netanyahu invites the refugees to vote.  Here is how Ynetnews portrays the story:

PM: We’ll let Israelis vote abroad

Netanyahu tells Likud faction his government plans to submit bill allowing every Israeli citizen to vote for Knesset from anywhere worldwide. ‘It will contribute to the connection and to Israel’s strength,’ he says.

As Dimi correctly notes, this is another subterfuge to reinforce the strength of the Israeli Jewish vote in the demographic battle with the Israeli Palestinian minority. It could also impact a decision to incorporate large portions of occupied territory with Palestinian population into Israel proper (like the area between the Wall and the Green Line.  Avigdor Lieberman, whose idea this is, has also proposed ridding Israel of some of its Arab minority by declaring some of their territory de facto part of a new Palestinian state, while granting Israel the right to annex large portions of the Territories that contain settlers.  This is yet another example of how the Kahanist right has inserted its far-right ideology into the political mainstream.  I call it “transfer-lite.”  The beauty of the voting proposal is Yvette can characterize it as a democratic reform that gives all Israeli citizens the right to a voice in their country’s affairs.  It’s quite a coup for those who really are anything but democrats.

But as Reider points out, they are playing with fire.  Because just as Israeli “refugees” may be allowed to vote in domestic elections, so too will Israeli Palestinian refugees apply for the same privileges.  The fact that they were expelled from Israel and so denied their right to Israeli citizenship, which was granted to all their remaining fellow Israeli Palestinians, will likely not hold up in a legal setting.  If the Israeli Supreme Court denies these individuals citizenship, then surely an International Court will find against Israel.  Then the Palestinian refugees will assert their legitimate right.

Taken to its most extreme, the coalition could propose that even Diaspora Jews should take Israeli citizenship and vote in elections.  Maybe they can even expedite it by having online applications: become an Israeli citizen from the comfort of your own home!

Similarly, settler extremists who are trying to render East Jerusalem Arab-rein by expropriating Arab property with the claim that it once belonged to Jews, are playing with fire.  It will only be a very short matter of time before Palestinian refugee families expelled from their homes in Katamon, Rehavya, and Talpiot will lodge claims in Israeli or international courts for recognition of their deeds.  What will the radical rightists do then?  Will they argue that Jewish deeds are valid while Arab deeds aren’t?  Well, if they had their druthers they’d merely say that Jews have such rights while Palestinians don’t.  That anti-democratic approach might play well in their circles and even among the majority of Israelis, but it won’t play in Peoria, that is the rest of the world.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Video Interview on Naveed Haq Seattle Jewish Federation Attack

Monday, February 8th, 2010


Watch Naveed Haq Seattle Jewish Federation Attack in News

I recently did an interview with Bill Alford of Seattle’s Moral Politics community-access TV program. We spoke about the issues surrounding the Naveed Haq trial and his recent conviction for first degree murder in the 2006 attack on the Seattle Jewish federation, which left one employee dead and five seriously injured.

We grappled with whether Haq’s sentence was just in a moral and religious sense and the overall theme of Muslim-Jewish tension rooted in the intractable Israeli-Arab conflict.

I wanted to warn that I made an error during the interview in suggesting that in Haq’s first trial, which ended in a hung jury, he was charged with second degree murder. A local journalist reports to me that he was charged with first degree murder in both cases.

It’s a 30 minute interview. I hope you’ll watch it and suggest to others interested in Muslim-Jewish relations that they watch it too.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Would Someone Please Give JTA’s Editor a Geography Lesson?

Saturday, February 6th, 2010

JTA, get me rewrite!  This one gave me the biggest laugh of the night at the expense of my pro-Israel bete noire Jewish news agency, JTA:

An Australian dog magazine has withdrawn a flyer showing a dog wearing a six-point yellow star.

Wuff magazine handed out flyers protesting a proposed new license for certain breeds of dog considered to be violent.

The flyer showed a pit-bull puppy sitting next to a Labrador puppy. The pit bull is wearing a yellow star with the word “Bose,” or evil, on it, according to reports.

Nazis forced Jews to wear a yellow star.

The Australian Jewish Community protested the flyer, saying in a statement issued Wednesday that “Putting the examination of certain breeds of dogs on the same level as the persecution, torture and murder of millions of people shows the mentality of whoever is responsible for the use of such material.”

My genuine Australian friend, Sol Salbe, pointed out that the Washington Post notes that Wuff Magazine is published in the well-known Australian city of Vienna, where they apparently speak Aussie-Deutsch.  Can someone please tell the JTA copy editor that Vienna is NOT in Australia!

Here’s how a professional news agency reports the same story:

Austrian magazine slammed for use of Jewish star

The Associated Press
Thursday, February 4, 2010; 11:41 AM

VIENNA — An Austrian dog magazine has pulled a flyer that showed a pit bull wearing a yellow star after protests from the country’s Jewish community…

Jerusalem Post, Australian Zionists Dump Chazan

Friday, February 5th, 2010

Haaretz reports that the Israeli rightist Jerusalem Post has dumped Naomi Chazan’s column in that newspaper.  The editor refused to elaborate when asked.  Clearly, this is connected to Im Tirtzu’s campaign of vilification against Chazan and New Israel Fund, which I’ve covered extensively here.  The only progressive commentators left there are Gershom Baskin and Larry Derfner.  I know it’s tough to tell a fellow journalist to harm their own livelihood, but the honorable thing for both of them to do would be to resign as well.  How can a progressive columnist continue to publish at a newspaper that falls prey to the most scurrilous, disgusting calumny?  I urge you to contact David Horovitz, the editor, and tell him what an ass he and his paper are (well, use more polite words–you know what I mean).

The Haaretz report also unmasks the radical right-wing pro-settler agenda of Im Tirtzu:

Im Tirtzu is trying to cast itself as a centrist movement…however, a Haaretz probe found that the influential forces behind the movement make no secret of their rightist political loyalties. Financially, Im Tirtzu is supported by a foundation that has contributed to radical right-wing organizations such as the Women in Green; Pastor John Hagee, the head of Christians United for Israel (CUFI) which contributed to Im Tirtzu, has been implicated in the past by a number of anti-Semitic statements.

Ideologically, the movement’s chairman Ronen Shoval used to be spokesman of the “Orange Cell,” a student chapter at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem that fought against the disengagement from the Gaza Strip and supported the settlement project. Shoval was even honored for his efforts with a citation from the evicted settlement block of Gush Katif.

The main channel for donations to Im Tirtzu is the Central Fund of Israel. In addition to Women in Green and Im Tirtzu, it supports Honenu, an organization sponsoring legal defense to radical right-wing activists in trouble with the law. Honenu boasts of financially supporting the families of the Bat Ayin underground, convicted for trying to bomb a girls’ school in East Jerusalem in 2002; of Ami Popper, who shot four Palestinian laborers during the first intifada; Yishai Schlissel, an ultra-Orthodox man who stabbed participants in a Gay Pride parade in Jerusalem in 2005; and Haggai Amir, brother of Yitzhak Rabin’s assassin Yigal Amir. Im Tirtzu’s Web site asks donations to be sent through the American foundation.

Shoval maintained yesterday that the American foundation’s services were used for technical reasons only. “We’re a small organization, and a small organizations needs a tax break for the donations it gets,” he said yesterday. “CFI is an organization that sends money to scores, if not hundreds, of Israeli organizations, left and right. Donations to it are tax deductible, and this is the only reason why we work with them. I am not familiar with their activities and I haven’t studied their organization in depth.”

Honenu, the group mentioned above, also attempts to get Jewish terrorist prisoners freed from prison including Yigal Amir, killer of Yitzhak Rabin.

Shoval is lying about CFI.  It supports NO left-wing Israeli groups.  None.  It is an Orthodox pro-settler funder and only supports explicitly Orthodox or settler organizations.  Jay Marcus, president of CFI lives in Efrat, a settlement.  I challenge Shoval to point to a single organization legitimately characterized as left wing that CFI has ever supported.  I’d challenge him to point to any Israeli Orthodox progressive groups CFI has supported.  There are such groups, but none on CFI’s grantee list.

I find this defense of Im Tirtzu’s acceptance of funding from Christian Zionist firebrand John Hagee to be disingenuous in the extreme:

…We’re not financially well-off enough to say no to money, even if the source doesn’t perfectly match my personal world view.”

The source perfectly matches his world view on the only issues that matter: hatred of Palestinians and affirmation of the God-given right of the Jewish people to maintain control of Greater Israel.  As for Hagee’s anti-Semitism, well, that’s not Shoval’s problem since he doesn’t live here and have to hear it and read it regularly in the media.

Of course non-profits have the option of turning down a gift from a source with which they disagree.  Would Im Tirtzu accept donations from Palestinians? Or a neo-Nazi group?  Of course not.

And more disingenuousness:

“Im Tirtzu is not a right-wing movement, I don’t see myself as a right-wing person, and it’s important for me this is said.”

It may be said, but that doesn’t mean it will be believed.  Why should he be when Haaretz notes:

Shoval himself published a large number of articles, all carrying explicitly rightist views.

Such as this Haaretz op-ed proclaiming the inviolability of settlements as an inherent part of the State of Israel:

The root of the problem…is the prevalent conception of the political, state and defense establishment, which says you can defend Gush Dan without the protective wall of Judea and Samaria.”

Shoval called Ariel Sharon “the worst prime minister” because he evacuated the Gaza settlements.  Yet this charlatan wants readers to see his organization in the same Zionist context as Likud, Kadima or Labor.  You ain’t foolin’ anyone, Shoval.  We can see right through ya.  When I read steaming horse manure like this I’m reminded of the hilarious line from Hester Street: “You can’t piss on my back and make me think it’s rain.”

I’m guessing that Im Tirtzu is merely a launching pad for a political career for the Shoval lad.  He’ll probably be on Likud’s new party list for the coming election.  And he’ll be a bright new voice.

The Australian Reform Movement, the Union for Progressive Judaism, also rescinded an invitation to Chazan to speak there.  The amount of distortion in the following shameful passage is astonishing:

According to ZCV [Zionist Council of Victoria] President Dr. Danny Lamm, news of the report…on Im Tirtzu’s Web site, had generated angry responses throughout the Melbourne Jewish community and the decision was made to withdraw Chazan’s invite.

“The activities of the NIF are anathema to Zionist groups such as ours, and frankly, we’re just not interested in having anything to with it,” Dr. Lamm told the Post by telephone from Melbourne on Tuesday.

“It’s not new to me, or many of us, that the NIF has supported groups that have damaged Israel and will continue to do damage to Israel, but others were surprised by this,” he added.

Lamm made it clear that the Zionist Council of Victoria represented all branches of Jewish political and religious affiliation, “from Likud to Meretz” and that they would “never bar anybody from the left just as they wouldn’t bar anyone from the right.

But the sort of stuff the NIF supports is so far removed from the community here,” Lamm added, saying “it was decided that Chazan’s public appearances be canceled.”

What I find so astonishing is that Lamm would believe that it was NIF that was extremist and not his own views. NIF is really a liberal Zionist group plain and simple. It’s views are glatt kosher as far as doctrinal Zionism is concerned. So for Lamm to contend that his group includes Meretz, but NIF is somehow farther out there to the left is simply unbelievable. The man doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Yet another example of the Diapsora Jewry have to be holier than the [Zionist] pope.

Actually, the Australians may’ve done Chazan a favor because at the rate the Shin Bet is going in criminalizing human rights work in Israel, they might not have allowed her back into the country on her return, deeming her to be a subversive security risk.  And who would the Shin Bet rely on to form this opinion?  Ronen Shoval and his friends at Im Tirtzu, of course.

UPDATE: I’m so tickled with the letter Sol Salbe features in the first comment below that I just had to note the irony that Australian Zionists have imposed their own academic/political boycott on Israelis of whom they don’t approve.  So what the BDS movement couldn’t achieve (yet) Australian Zionists HAVE.  Mazel tov.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Israel Lobby Loonies Stalk J Street

Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010

Love that kosher sushi--that makes it worth the trip

Tomorrow, J Street will be celebrating its merger with Brit Tzedek and the launch of its local grassroots initiative with meetings all over the U.S. The main event will be held at Penn Hillel and will be videocast all over the country to the other gatherings. It will feature J Street director, Jeremy Ben Ami. For the loony Israel lobby right, it’s too much to bear. Not only is J Street going from strength to strength, a university Hillel is hosting the traitors.

That mobilized the forces of ZOA and Z Street (what dya think the “Z” stands for?) into a full bore stalking expedition.  Not to be outdone, they’re scheduling not one, but TWO counter meetings at Penn Hillel which are deliberately timed to compete (that’s called stalking).  It’s going to be something like biur chometz in which they’ll go through the building with a fine-tooth comb ridding it of any bit of J Street defilement.  Maybe they’ll even host an exorcism if they feel the building has been mortally compromised.

Penn Hillel has been under such assault that it felt compelled to release a statement explaining its decision to offer a rental space to J Street.

You can see the graphic for the Z Street event displayed here, which will feature former Aipac hack, Mitchell Bard, author of the Jewish Virtual Pro-Israel Library.  Bard also directs the ACE program which funds pro-Israel academic positions on willing campuses thanks to the help of the Schusterman Foundation, which also pays Mitch a cool 125G’s for his trouble.

The ZOA has brought one of its staff hit men to conduct a full bore witch hunt entitled, Is J Street Bad for Israel? The question mark seems superfluous.  This event is co-sponsored by Hillel while the J Street event is not.  But the mere idea of J Street inside a Jewish building seems to have the loony right in fits of apoplexy.

Many Jewish peace activists chuckle at the antics of lunatics like Mort Klein who has been shrying about left wing Jewish perfidy for decades.  But the truth is that Klein and ZOA have the support of the cream of the Jewish fat-cat funding world.  If you review this press release you’ll see that no less than Ronald Lauder, Mort Zuckerman and James Tisch will headline this year’s fundraising dinner.  Itamar Marcus, former Israeli intelligence officer and current director of the Palestinian media smear outfit, Palestine Media Watch, will also be honored with an award actually named after Ben Hecht (!) for his hatchet work.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Israeli Rightist Ad Assaulting New Israel Fund, Too Much Even for Hagee

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

I feel a bit like I’m Alice in Wonderland and John Hagee is the Mad Hatter.  Today, he conceded that there is pro-Israel nationalist rhetoric that even embarrasses HIM.  He was referring to this Der Shturmer-like ad smearing Naomi Hazan.  Apparently, he didn’t cotton to J Street’s tying his previous anti-Semitic remarks to Im Tirtzu’s hateful anti-peace rhetoric via a $200,000 gift to the latter from his Christians United for Israel:

Im Tirtzu’s political leanings are clear. This is a pro-settler group, with $100,000 of funding from Christians United For Israel, a conservative Christian Zionist organization run by Pastor John Hagee, who once stated that God sent Hitler to drive Jews to Israel.

JTA is the source of this fascinating news.  But not willing to earn credit for breaking such a great story, it typically puts its foot into it by being far too credulous in accepting the veracity of right-wing Jewish sources.  Clearly, the CUFI publicist, Ari Morgenstern, fed the JTA reporter a pro-Hagee line and he accepted it hook line and sinker.

First, the reporter alleges that J Street’s attack on CUFI for its gift to Im Tirtzu is the same type of “guilt by association” used by Im Tirtzu against the New Israel Fund (i.e. blaming NIF for the actions of its grantees in cooperating with Goldstone).  This is utter nonsense and clearly fed to JTA by CUFI.  J Street’s goal was to indict Im Tirtzu.  CUFI was merely a tool for it to do so.  If J Street had intended to impugn CUFI there are far more powerful tools than a $200,000 donation to use–like Hagee’s own misbegotten words.

JTA’s second error caused by accepting CUFI’s PR line, is this inaccurate rebuttal of the J Street quotation above:

The [J Street] statement cit[ed] an eschatological analysis from the late 1990s that Hagee has since repudiated.

Bruce Wilson and Rachel Tabachnick, the activist founders of Talk2Action, rebut this claim by noting that Hagee made this statement in 2005 and has never repudiated it.  In fact, they have the video to prove it.  The only ‘repudiation’ that happened was John McCain renouncing Hagee’s presidential candidacy endorsement just after Talk2Action released the video footage.  I have also blogged about this Hagee sermon here.

CUFI’s Ari Morgenstern seems to be the PR flack of choice for the far-right pro-Israel lobby groups.  He mixed it up here with a Shelly Adelson-funded former client by claiming the latter promoted the film Obsession, only to have the client deny it, after which Morgenstern dropped a dime on her.  I love it when the pro-Israel right turns on each other and (proverbial) blood runs in the streets.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Dershowitz Calls Goldstone ‘Evil,’ ‘Traitor to Jews;’ Shin Bet Urges NIF Investigation

Sunday, January 31st, 2010

Israeli far-right goes 'Der Shturmer' on Naomi Hazan in Jerusalem Post ad.

I’ve never felt this more than tonight.  There is deep evil afoot among elements of the IDF, Shin Bet, and in the halls of hasbara represented by Alan Dershowitz and the like.  Much of it revolves around the hysterical reaction by the Israeli military and political elite to the Goldstone Report.  We knew all this before.  But the attacks have never been so vicious as those of the past few days, bordering on incitement to violence.  The phrases being voiced remind me of the environment just before Yitzchak Rabin was assassinated by the same type of rabid Israeli nationalist as the ones calling for blood from Israeli peace activists.  I know many of us have been critical of the Israeli left and the peace movement.  I remain so.  But it is now time to pick whichever portion of the Israeli left we can most support and do so wholeheartedly.  The Israeli left is under attack as never before.

Two developments in particular have chilled me to the bone, and I thank Jerry Haber for posting about Dershowitz’s latest eruption and Didi Remez for posting about the IDF’s machinations against Prof. Naomi Hazan and New Israel Fund.  And I urge you after reading this to do everything in your power to support the forces under assault.  Make contributions to New Israel Fund.  Send messages of support to Prof. Hazan.  Call your local Israeli consulate to complain about the assaults on her and Justice Goldstone.  This must stop.

I do not have a problem with anyone whether right or left expressing their views on the issues.  It is good to criticize Goldstone or New Israel Fund if you feel they’ve got things wrong.  But it is dead wrong to call your opponent “evil” or use Der Sturmer tactics to turn your opponent into a subhuman (note the rhino horn on Prof. Hazan’s head in the graphic I’ve posted here–the Hebrew word for “Fund” is the same as “horn,” which explains the rather foolish-looking horn on her head).

We MUST turn the conversation away from this assault and back on the substance of the Goldstone Report.  We must support the UN process outlined in Goldstone which could bring the report for consideration by the Security Council and International Court of Justice if the Israelis and Hamas refuse to investigate their misdeeds.  This is where attention needs to be.  And not on accusations of treason and other McCarthyite red herrings.

Please spend time reading the articles linked here and listening to the Dershowitz radio interview and disseminate this as widely as possible with the added message that we will not take our eyes off the ball that is Goldstone.  We will stand by our allies in Israel and outside it when they are under attack.

Alan Dershowitz gave a radio interview to Israeli army radio, Galey Tzahal, in which he launched a full frontal attack on Justice Goldstone.  Keep in mind that the Israeli officials discussing whether and how to create the least effective investigative panel that would satisfy the Goldstone conditions have bandied about the name of this thug as a potential member of the panel.  Here are some of the interview’s key passages:

D: The Goldstone Report is a defamation written by an evil, evil man.  Goldstone is an evil man.  No one should mince words about it.  He allowed his Jewishness, the fact that his name is Goldstone, and that he has connections to Israel–he allowed himself to be used to give…a heksher, a certification of purity to a defamation.

It would be as if the Czar when he wrote the Protocols of the Elders of Zion he asked a prominent to Jew to edit the report and sign the Protocols in order to show that it had credibility.

Galey Tzahal: Do you hint Prof. Dershowitz that he is a moser, someone who betrays his own people?

D: Absolutely.  There is a prayer that is said every day for people like him: La-malshinim al t’hi tikvah (“there shall be no hope for the betrayers”).  He is a man who uses his language, his words against the Jewish people.  I regarded him as a friend.  I now regard his as an absolute traitor.

Eyal Nir, on my Facebook page makes a perceptive comment (Hebrew) about the Protocols: either Dershowitz is claiming that the Protocols were based on true testimony or he’s claiming that Goldstone is the same type of fraud as the Protocols.  Perhaps Dersh wants us the believe Cast Lead never happened or all those Gazan civilians didn’t die?  Can anyone doubt this man is a charlatan?

Later in the interview Dershowitz says he hasn’t been asked to serve on the committee.  With mock modesty he ventured Justice Aharon Barak as a better candidate for the panel.  Jerry Haber points out that when the Goldstone Report was first issued Defense Minister Barak approached Dershowitz and Barak to spearhead the campaign in Israel’s defense.  You can see what Dersh’s reply was.  Barak refused.  And given this performance, how likely does anyone think it will be for Aharon Barak to answer this tainted call to serve?

If you understand Hebrew, also listen to the remainder of the interview with Shulamit Aloni who savages Dershowitz, calling him a “patriot nutcase” and Ehud Barak, saying she believes he deliberately wanted to kill Gaza civilians during Cast Lead.  She also calls him “the most dangerous man in Israel” and a “Napoleon” (which is rendered even funnier by the fact that Barak is quite short).

Didi Remez translates part of the story by Maariv’s Ben Caspit which reveals that the Knesset’s foreign affairs and security committee will deliberate about New Israel Fund’s alleged role in collaborating with the Goldstone Report by passing incriminating IDF documents to it, thereby blackening Israel’s name in the process.  These documents were forwarded to the Attorney General by the Shin Bet, requesting an investigation be launched.

In an earlier story on the affair, Caspit writes this incendiary claptrap about NIF (as reported in Noam Sheizaf’s blog post):

“Israel’s image is at an all-times low. International pressure is mounting, and with it the calls for boycott. All this was fueled by the Goldstone report, which was in itself fueled by Israeli sources. The funding for these sources is provided by, amongst others, the NIF. The question is whether the New Israeli Fund is indeed for Israel.”

Caspit mentions 300 grassroots and social organizations receiving funds through the NIF, and asks: “is all this activity just intended to serve as a front for radical subversive activity, acting against the very foundations of the state?”

Other Knesset members are proposing ending cooperation between all government agencies and NIF grantees (NIF funds various social justice, human rights and anti-poverty NGOs and initiatives in Israeli Jewish and Arab communities).

Far-right Israeli nationalists protest outside Naomi Hazan's home. Placards say: "Love Naomi--Hate Tzahal" (Flash 90)

The far-right nationalist group, Im Tirtzu, is campaigning against NIF and Naomi Hazan, its Israeli chair, placing the ad displayed here in the Jerusalem Post.  The Israeli right have demonstrated outside Hazan’s home dressed in in mock Hamas kefiyes and thanking her for her support.

Here are some of the shenanigans the Israeli right and intelligence services have planned for NIF:

..The materials exposed…are familiar to the IDF authorities and the legal authorities in Israel. Some of them were given half a year ago to the Military Advocate General Brig. Gen. Avichai Mandelblit.He checked the material and gave it to the Atty. Gen., with a recommendation to open an official investigation. No such investigation has been made so far. The Shin Bet is also familiar with the material and the sensitive issue. Taking action against this is not simple because NIF is a registered association in the US. Also, it is noteworthy that a large part of the fund’s activities in Israel are devoted to social and public issues of the first order.

“It will be hard to connect this activity to political subversion,” said a security source, who is well familiar with the affair. “But on the other hand, there is clearly a worrisome pattern here that is causing Israel serious damage and helping its worst critics tie the IDF’s hands and undermine the legitimacy of the Jewish state in general and its right to defend itself in particular.”

Im Tirtzu is now planning to launch a large public campaign, both against the New Israel Fund in general and personally against its head, Prof. Naomi Hazan. Dozens of movement activists demonstrated last night in front of Hazan’s house dressed up as Hamas activists and carried signs thanking Hazan and the fund.

For the past few months and until tonight, I’d broken off contact and support for NIF over the treatment of fellow blogger, Shamai Leibowitz several years ago.  Since Ben Caspit played an instrumental role in this affair as a conduit of the Shin Bet in smearing Shamai, it’s appropriate to bring it up now.  Shamai came to the U.S. to study international human rights and receive a law degree from George Washington University.  He came with the support of an NIF fellowship.  Leibowitz taught a State Department language, culture and politics course for new U.S. diplomats being sent to Israel.  That is, he taught the course until Aipac found out about it and conveyed this information to the Israeli government, which in turn leaked the information to Caspit, who published it as a juicy piece of gossip: defender of convicted terrorist Marwan Barghouti teaching U.S. diplomats about Israeli culture.  You get the drift.  Shamai lost the job.

Later, Shamai made a speech endorsing the BDS movement in Cambridge which was also reported back to the powers that be in Israel.  Such pressure was exerted that NIF dropped Shamai from the program.  When I learned of this I was so angry I wrote to the then NIF director, Larry Garber, berating him for his betrayal of Shamai.  He never responded.  That’s when I cut my ties to NIF.

But as far as I’m concerned, the Israeli power structure is out to castrate NIF and I simply won’t allow it to happen.  It’s all hands on deck.  Do not let this ship go down.

Those of you who follow the Israeli media closely should note the role that Ben Caspit is playing in this little escapade.  Some journalists’ interests are so closely allied with the security services their salaries might as well be paid by them.  Caspit is one such.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Breaking the Silence: IDF Women Soldiers Testify to Abuse

Saturday, January 30th, 2010

IDF soldiers beat Palestinian

Breaking the Silence has regularly released eyewitness accounts by IDF soldiers of abuse they either perpetrated or witnessed in their service in the Occupied Territories.  The last round of testimonies concerned Operation Cast Lead.  The latest round concerns female soldiers who recount their own peculiar set of experiences regarding such mistreatment.  Ynetnews features a summary of key accounts.  You can hear them and read the original Hebrew article here.  Here are a few of the more shocking passages:

‘Child’s hand broken on the chair’

A female soldier in Sachlav Military Police unit, stationed in Hebron, recalled a Palestinian child that would systematically provoke the soldiers by hurling stones at them…One time he even managed to scare a soldier who fell from his post and broke his leg.

Retaliation came soon after: “I don’t know who or how, but I know that two of our soldiers put him in a jeep, and that two weeks later the kid was walking around with casts on both arms and legs…they talked about it in the unit quite a lot – about how they sat him down and put his hand on the chair and simply broke it right there on the chair.”

Even small children did not escape arbitrary acts of violence, said a Border Guard female officer serving near the separation fence: “We caught a five-year-old…can’t remember what he did…we were taking him back to the territories or something, and the officers just picked him up, slapped him around and put him in the jeep. The kid was crying and the officer next to me said ‘don’t cry’ and started laughing at him. Finally the kid cracked a smile – and suddenly the officer gave him a punch in the stomach. Why? ‘Don’t laugh in my face’ he said.”

*   *

“Crossing the checkpoint, it’s like another world… Palestinians walk with trolleys on the side of the road, with wagons, donkeys… so the Border Guards take a truck with the remains of food and start throwing it at them… cottage cheese, rotten vegetables… it was the most appalling thing I experienced in the territories.”

The soldier said she tried to protest, but was silenced by the commanding officers. When she tried to go around them to higher authorities, she found a solution. “Almost immediately I got into an officers’ course.”

*   *

Settler children harassing Palestinians

This is perhaps the most disturbing of the stories recounted. As you read it, remember that the Hebron Fund raises millions of American Jewish dollars to support precisely this type of behavior by settler children against innocent Palestinian civilians. It simply breaks my heart for the victims to face such violence perpetrated by Jews, who do so out of some perverted notion that their religion somehow justifies, nay demands such treatment. This literally makes me sick to my stomach not just as a human being, but as a Jew. In fact, I would dare even someone supporting the settlers to try to explain, defend or justify this:

Another female Sachlav soldier told the story of the time an eight-year-old settler girl in Hebron decided to bash a stone into the head of a Palestinian adult crossing her passing by her in the street. “Boom! She jumped on him, and gave it to him right here in the head… then she started screaming ‘Yuck, yuck, his blood is on me’”.

The soldier said the Palestinian then turned in the girl’s direction – a move that was interpreted as a threat by one of the soldiers in the area, who added a punch of his own: “And I stood there horrified… an innocent little girl in her Shabbat dress… the Arab covered the wound with his hand and ran.” She recalled another incident with the same child: “I remember she had her brother in the stroller, a baby. She was giving him stones and telling him: ‘Throw them at the Arab‘.”

Where does such hate come from? How can it be justified? Even by settlers themselves? And does anyone who seeks to explain this behavior believe that this hate is in the minority in this movement?

And how can any American Jew, even the most extreme, justify giving a dime to support such people. Doing so is a hillul hashem, a desecration of God’s name.  Further, how can the U.S. government allow such donations to be tax-deductible?  Not in my name.  That’s what I say.  Barack Obama: this is what your and my taxpayer dollars indirectly subsidize.  Stop this now!  Repeal the non-profit status of all U.S. funders supporting settler groups.

*   *

The account below describes how easy it is to kill Palestinian children and cover up the crime:

A female Border Guard officer in Jenin spoke of an incident in which a nine-year-old Palestinian, who tried to climb the fence, failed, and fled – was shot to death: “They fired… when he was already in the territories and posed no danger. The hit was in the abdomen area, they claimed he was on a bicycle and so they were unable to hit him in the legs.”

But the soldier was most bewildered by what happened next between the four soldiers present: “They immediately got their stories straight… An investigation was carried out, at first they said it was an unjustified killing… In the end they claimed that he was checking out escape routes for terrorists or something… and they closed the case.”

*   *

I find the following story especially intriguing because it details the complexity of the gender relationships at work for a female soldier goaded into abusing Palestinian victims by a male superior officer.  She deals with her own vulnerability as a minority female in a male bastion, the IDF, by out-doing her male counterparts for violence.  The fact that she’s abusing a Palestinian man, for whom such degradation at the hands of a woman is an especial cultural badge of shame, adds to the strangeness of the entire incident:

‘They don’t know how to accept the women’

The female soldiers repeatedly mention the particular difficulties they had as women, who had to prove that to were “fighters” in the midst of the goading male soldiers on the one hand, and the Palestinians, who have a hard time handling women in uniform on the other hand. The following story of a female Border Guard officer sums the matter up.

When the interviewer asked her if the Palestinians “suffer even more from the women in the Border Guard”, she said: “Yes. Yes. Because they don’t know how to accept the women. The moment a girl slaps a man, he is so humiliated, he is so humiliated he doesn’t know what to do with himself… I am a strong and well-built girl, and this is even harder for them to handle. So one of their ways of coping is to laugh. They really just started to laugh at me. The commander looks at me and tells me, ‘What? Are you going to let that slide? Look how he’s laughing at you’.

“And you, as someone who has to salvage your self-respect… I told them to sit down and I told him to come…I told him to come close, I really approached him, as if I was about to kiss him. I told him, ‘Come, come, what are you afraid of? Come to me!’ And I hit him in the balls. I told him, ‘Why aren’t you laughing?’ He was in shock, and then he realized that… not to laugh. It shouldn’t reach such a situation.”

You hit him with your knee?

“I hit him in the balls. I took my foot, with my military show, and hit him in the balls. I don’t know if you’ve ever been hit in the balls, but it looks like it hurts. He stopped laughing in my face because it hurt him. We then took him to a police station and I said to myself, ‘Wow, I’m really going to get in trouble now.’ He could complain about me and I could receive a complaint at the Military police’s criminal investigation division.

“He didn’t say a word…I was afraid about myself, not about him. But he didn’t say a word. ‘What should I say, that a girl hit me?’ And he could have said, but thank God, three years later I didn’t get anything and no one knows about it.”

What did it feel like that moment?

“Power, strength that I should not have achieved this way. But I didn’t brag about it. That’s why I did it that way, one on one. I told them to sit on the side, I saw that he wasn’t looking. I said to myself that it doesn’t make sense that as a girl who gives above and beyond and is worth more than some boys – they should laugh at me like that because I am a girl. Because you think I can’t do it…”

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]