11 thoughts on “U.S. Continues Deadly Game: Drone Beast Busted Over Iran – Tikun Olam תיקון עולם إصلاح العالم
task-attention.png
Comments are published at the sole discretion of the owner.
 

  1. Actually, Richard, for those of us who can’t help but to connect the dots:
    http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/10/drone-virus-nuisance/

    “Air Force Insists: Drone Cockpit Virus Just a ‘Nuisance’”

    Guess what? The Iranians caught the bogey in their airspace and they TOOK OVER ITS CONTROLS AND LANDED IT. That is the most plausible explanation. I believe the virus was the precedent that even DARPA could not figure out.

    You see, in every country there exists a group of individuals who are literally so adept with computers that they far exceed any assets government can ever acquire, and at a young age. Now, imagine if the people in that country banded together under a legitimate foreign threat like Israel? Imagine if “Anonymous” were aligned with our government under an ACTUAL common threat? Like AIPAC and the hijacking of our government and currency during the Woodrow Wilson administration to the present day. Or the internal enemies who sold our national interests for a few silver, like Cheney. This is who the Iranians are across the board. 99.99% of Iranians would rather live 100 years under this government than allow a foreign power to again meddle in their affairs. This is the bitter pill that the warmongers won’t swallow.

    And now the US wants to coax Iran into showing footage of the intact drone to confirm that its valuable intelligence has been effectively stolen. If I was Iran, I would not show my hand. I would let the warmongers assume the worst rather than confirm the best, if damaged.

    I think the final mistake will the Iran war. I hope they make it. I’m tired of waxing poetic about how they are bluffing.

    Now, I’m calling them chicken to their face. Bawk bawk. Attack, if you’re men. Otherwise, it’s clear: Iran is the regional hegemon in the Middle East. Israeli dominance is officially over. PUT UP, OR STFU.

  2. PS – also, imagine if an Iranian drone were caught in America? We’d be wringing our panties at the UN about territorial sovereignty and a justified attack on Iran.

    Is Iran justified to encroach on our borders now? I think that’s the narrative the Reuters-AP lie foundation press agencies have been pushing to try to open an avenue towards causus belli. Technically, I am not sure – I will have to check many international instances and laws to see what the likely course of events will be. But, I doubt Iran would even allow the US such positioning to potentially create an opening for war with Iran. This was a win-win for them.

    I think it’s time for the Iranian government to act like a screaming banshee with her eyes plucked out like Israel does for it’s one POW tank soldier who was caught on duty, or for America asking them to stop illegal settlement building.

    Hell, imagine if a Palestinian youth threw a paper plane towards Israel?

  3. If Iran has developed a capability to jam or spoof our drone navigation control systems, they certainly won’t advertise it lest we make efforts to better encrypt it. If that is the case, it is obvious they would prefer us to believe that they shot it down or that it suffered a genuine fault.

    … or encrypt it at all. The Israelis used to not bother encrypting their drones’ camera takes and Hezbollah routinely ripped it, giving their own intel people a look at exactly what the Israelis were looking at in Lebanon. Hez finally let the cat out of the bag, under massive political pressure from the Hariri investigation, when they released footage of Israeli drones surveilling Hariri’s route. The release neither proved Hez’s innocence nor Israeli culpability, but it did shed significant, if not terminal, doubt on the entire proceedings.

    1. True, but I think this is part of the calculus. Showing the potential invader that their most stealth reconnaissance craft was not shot down, but in a sophisticated manner that would literally mean that Iranian technicians outdid our BEST, DARPA (if anyone has UFOs, they do), and also in a manner that allowed them acquire vital components and know-how.

      The drones were never created under the frame of mind that they could be hacked electronically and all means of self-destruction turned off during the incommunicado.

      To the potential invader, it says: look at what we can do to your “awesome” technology. We’re not Saddam Hussein or Iraq. We have brains and we use them. And we’re capable of defending ourselves.

      Here’s the other thing, the hacking itself created a circumstance by which any attempt to reconfigure the drones may very well be observed by Iran through surveillance. So mitigation steps would be futile.

      Realistically, Iran may have just completely bashed a REALLY expensive Lockheed Martin SkunkWorks project and totally took us out of the drone warfare state-of-the-art with one move/one drone.

  4. The Iranian story reminds me of a 2009 report in The Wall Street Journal http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126102247889095011.html where we learned that “militants in Iraq have used $26 off-the-shelf software to intercept live video feeds from U.S. Predator drones, potentially providing them with information they need to evade or monitor U.S. military operations.”

    Read that again and try not to fall over laughing! A multibillion dollar marauding beast done in by ready-to-use spy kit sold by a Russian firm, no less!

    While the “potential drone vulnerability lies in an unencrypted downlink between the unmanned craft and ground control” and was known by “full-spectrum dominance” corporate bagmen, um, military “planners” since 1999, they did nothing.

    But it gets better. “The stolen video feeds also indicate that U.S. adversaries continue to find simple ways of counteracting sophisticated American military technologies.”

    Why didn’t the Pentagon force their suppliers, General Atomics, Inc. to fix the problem? “Because military officials have long assumed no one would make the effort to try to intercept it.”

    There it is, good old imperial hubris!

    Several possibilities: 1) The Iranians may not have shot down the RQ-170 Sentinel but “merely” recovered it when it flew off-course and crashed. 2) They did shoot it down, but then why play coy and say they recovered it intact? 3) Their electronic warfare capabilities may be more advanced than the imperialists believe, but they would have had to have (presumably) cracked the Sentinel’s encryption; not impossible, just real difficult.

    In any event, even if they recovered it in pieces, it would cough up many design and avionics secrets which a multitude of interested parties, including the Iranians, would love to get their hands on.

    “Net-centric warfare” at its best!

    You can read a send-up I wrote on the 2009 video-feed story over at Antifascist Calling: http://antifascist-calling.blogspot.com/2009/12/hackable-drones-crumbling-empire.html

    1. Not sure if this is in your realm of expertise, but would the virus I mentioned and linked to above affecting drones serve as a proper gateway to bypassing or surpassing encryption?

      I’m not surprised that they did not fix their software development security loophole — I know many software engineers who work for Lockheed, BASF, Honeywell.. and trust me, they weren’t at the top of their classes. Some of them don’t even know what a Windows registry is. 9 year olds in Estonia can shut off entire power grids and cellular antenna assays.

  5. Sorry, Persian Advocate, that’s way beyond my skill set. Wired Magazine’s Threat Level blog http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/10/virus-hits-drone-fleet/ did a series about the mysterious virus in Predator and Reaper drones in October. According to Wired, the malware logged “pilots’ every keystroke as they remotely fly missions over Afghanistan and other warzones.” Here’s the kicker, military spokespeople told Wired, “We keep wiping it off, and it keeps coming back,” and they’re not sure whether it was introduced accidentally or on purpose. Talk about bad “op sec”!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share via
Copy link