.jpg){kind=small}
mini.jpg)
Tirkel Commission members Horev, Tirkel and Rosenne: the geriatric brigade (GPO/Getty)
After the Israeli NGO Gush Shalom filed a complaint with the Supreme Court seeking to disband the Tirkel commission investigating the Mavi Marmara disaster, the chairman, retired Supreme Court Justice Yaakov Tirkel, threatened to resign (Hebrew–and in English). He demanded the government expand his powers and transform the commission into an official state commission with full powers to subpoena witnesses and define its own mandate.
Faced with a serious legal challenge and the potential disintegration of the investigation, the government relented and gave Tirkel what he wanted. But it remains to be seen what this may signify in the greater scheme of things. You remain with a commission heavily weighted toward letting the IDF off the hook for the massacre that occurred given the history of the members I’ve outlined in earlier posts here.
For proof of the expected outcome you have only to look as far as Bibi’s “mandate” to the commission when he first announced it:
The creation of this commission will confirm to the entire world that Israel acts according to law, with transparency, and full accountability. Two central principles informed my considerations: preserving the freedom of action of the IDF and trust in the military investigation; and providing a convincing response to the responsible nations within the world community (viz. the U.S.).
Clearly, Bibi doesn’t want a true commission of inquiry like the 9/11 Commission. He wants a convincing bit of hasbara which will give the IDF a clean bill of health and get the world off its back so it can go about its business of maintaining the siege and Occupation.
If Tirkel was a sophisticated advocate of Israel’s case he would make the case to Bibi that a commission that has full powers and exonerates the IDF will be more convincing to the world than an emasculated panel which does the same. I still see little likelihood that the truth will come out or anyone will be held accountable for the obvious (to all but Israel) failures of this operation.
If anyone who is serious about human rights and democratic values (that leaves you out, Gerald Steinberg), you need look no further than Gush Shalom’s High Court petition to see the absolute necessity of such Israeli NGOs acting as a watchdog over the Israeli government and its machinations.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Turkey Commitee Begins Its Work (syds-blog.blogspot.com)
Tags: gaza flotilla, Israel Defense Forces, israeli-supreme-court, Mavi Marmara
“Emasculated panel”… interesting choice of words in light of Amos Horev’s track record.
Hmmmm. I can tell you’re one of my faithful readers. Even I didn’t make that connection!
More bad jokes, but some serious concerns about adding women to the panel.
http://www.haaretz.com/culture/arts-leisure/the-forgotten-females-1.298862
no need for an investigation…the ihh has already completed theirs
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/45521038/Mavi-Marmara-Report
israel is guilty…case closed
bet richard feels much better, cuz he is so concerned that the elderly panelists may overtax themselves
Actually, the octogenarians should be sent home not because IHH did their job for them, but because they can’t do a proper job. Only an international investigation can do that.
Please listen to 9/11 commissioner Bob Kerrey speak on the matter (I linked to specific comments near the end of the video, but I recommend watching all three parts). Also, when digging up that video I noticed Al Franken has been talking with Kerrey. That’s just scratching the surface, but point being; Bibi wants to fool the world with a massive cover-up, just like Cheney did with the 9/11 Commission.
Doh, I botched the Bob Kerrey link.
And I linked the wrong Al Franken video. Please pardon my early morning bumbling.
Anything less than a true international panel (not old men cherrypicked by Netanyahu) is a farce. There should be full investigations made – interviews of both the people on the flotilla and the commandos. Forensic evidence should be collected and analyzed. This “panel” is a joke and I wonder why the world is sitting by and saying nothing.