Muslim and Jewish Women in Nazareth

'We can live in peace'...John Lennon (photo: Dafna Tal)

Mahzor

Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Bush’s War: Reading Behind the Images

1,200 U.S. military personnel re-enlist in Iraq on U.S. national holiday (Michael Kamber/NYT)

The front page of today’s NY Times features this image of 1,200 U.S. soldiers re-enlisting in one of Saddam’s former palaces yesterday in honor of our national holiday.  It’s clearly supposed to convey an image of strength, that our armed forces are doing something right in Iraq, that our own personnel have so much confidence in our efforts that they’re willing to re-enlist.  It’s really a great piece of PR puffery.

But what does it miss?  That the Pentagon is often missing its recruitment targets to fill places in the volunteer army.  That it has continually betrayed faith with serving soldiers by extending tours of duty.  That our government has betrayed the faith of our armed forces by providing no exit strategy or even draw-down strategy for those stationed in combat zones like Iraq and Afghanistan. 1,200 have re-enlisted. But what about the troops not in the picture. What do they feel about their assignment? And what about the 4,000+ who aren’t coming home?

Like everything coming from this Administration, this image needs to be re-read and re-interpreted in light of the story it doesn’t tell.

Tags:

4 Responses to “Bush’s War: Reading Behind the Images”

  1. Dan Sniderman says:

    Abd this is the administration that want’s to start a third war in Iran (see Seymour Hersh)…

  2. Andy says:

    Most people correctly understand that you can support the troops but not support the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan; it is less well understood that you can support these wars but not support the troops. I wish we could have taken these soldiers on a tour of the Walter Reed Army Medical Center before they re-enlisted:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Reed_Army_Medical_Center#2007_neglect_scandal

  3. Diane says:

    And I wonder how many of the soldiers in this picture re-enlisted because they would otherwise have been stop-lossed? If you’re going to have to stay in the Army whether you like it or not, maybe you might as well stay “voluntarily” and earn yourself a re-enlistment bonus.

  4. rykart says:

    “Most people correctly understand that you can support the troops but not support the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. ”

    Nonsense.

    Anyone who joins the United States military post-Vietnam is a war criminal. Let’s save our sympathies for the hundreds of thousands of lives these “servicemen” have destroyed, the women they’ve raped, the children whose arms and legs they’ve blown off, the multitudes they’ve degraded and tortured, the country they have battered beyond recognition.

Leave a Reply

Tikun Olam-תקון עולם: Make the World a Better Place is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache!