Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for September, 2011

Gede: Thanks for the Memories

Tuesday, September 13th, 2011
gede yellow labrador retriever

Gede in her prime

Believe it or not, I used to publish personal posts here about my family, pets, hobbies, etc.  But I found it less and less possible to do that because so many people want to invade the privacy of my loved ones in inappropriate ways.  But tonight I’ll make an exception for someone special.

My 11 year-old Labrador Retriever, Gede, is in failing health.  She’s a yellow Lab, with the sweetest, kindest disposition.  Never met anyone she didn’t like, especially if they had a treat for her.  She was a little smaller than the average Lab, so our breeder gave her to us because we wanted a dog whose disposition and size wouldn’t overwhelm our kids (when we had them).  We got her when she was eight weeks old and we could hold her as a tiny ball of fur in one hand.  By the time she was mature, she’d been so well trained (which wasn’t just due to a good trainer, but rather Gede’s incredible quickness and smartness in picking up her lessons) that we could walk her everywhere without a leash.

My wife’s uncle, who’s a great joker at heart, came to visit and offered her one of his highest compliments:

That dog doesn’t know she’s a dog, she thinks she’s a person.

I remember when we brought our first son home, at the dog trainer’s suggestion, I put the baby’s cradle down on the floor and then let Gede enter the room.  She proceeded to come over to sniff and lick our son, who probably didn’t relish the idea.  Little did Gede know, but she’d have to share us with the newborn.  But she was such a kindly, gentle dog that she never held anything against anyone.  You could step on her foot, the babies would try to ride her as if she was a pony.  She suffered through it all with great dignity.

She has the most soulful brown eyes and if a dog can think deep thoughts she did.  Maybe they weren’t deep in the human sense but she had so much soul.  A Great Dog Soul.

But now her abdomen is filling with fluid and she’s in great discomfort.  She may have an adrenal tumor or end-stage kidney failure.  We don’t know.  But our vet tells us that so much fluid in a dog’s abdomen is a sign of something seriously (meaning, terminally) wrong.  So we plan to put her to sleep tomorrow morning.

My wife keeps saying: “She’s my baby,” because we got Gede before we had our first child.  In fact, her name means “first-born” in Balinese.  We’d spent our honeymoon on Bali and met a young boy visiting a temple who’d been so irrepressibly happy and joyful to meet us, sticking out his hand in a very western gesture of friendship, that we named our dog after him (probably not a great honor in Balinese culture, but we meant it so).

So tomorrow she will be gone.  But we will not forget.

As I was making these sad plans today, I heard the following radio show, Two Enemies, One Heart, on KUOW here in Seattle and it changed my disposition entirely.  It is the story of two men, one Iraqi and one Iranian, who met on the battlefield during the Iran-Iraq war.  The Iranian saved the Iraqi’s life and did so almost at the cost of his own.  Both of them ended up at different times as prisoners of war.  One imprisoned for 17 years and the other for over two years.  Both suffered immense deprivation, one lost a fiancé in a bombing and the other came home and couldn’t find his wife or child whom he’d left behind to go to war.

Both of them, unbeknownst to the other, ended up migrating after their respective lives filled with horrors, to Vancouver, BC.  The Iranian, in despair after escaping from Iran and not knowing how to deal with his new-found freedom in the west, attempts suicide.  By some absolute miracle, they both end up in the waiting room of a clinic which provides therapy for torture survivors.  Through tentative chit-chat and then rushing questions and wild gesticulations, they come to understand that they are long-lost brothers in arms.  That is how the Iranian saved the Iraqi’s life during the war, and the Iraqi saved the Iranian’s life after the war.

This is a truly brilliant piece of radio journalism.  Not only do I strongly recommend it–I’d say the only reason not to listen is if you’re the happiest, best adjusted human being in the entire world.  If you’re not, then you need cheering up and this will make you realize that the human species is truly capable of greatness, especially in the midst of the absolute horrors that we can inflict on each other.

And if another reader here says a word about how primitive Middle Eastern culture is I might just ring their necks (but no, that would violate the spirit of this story)–or force them to listen to this.  These two men have hearts big enough to encompass an entire world.

Israeli Consul General Demands to Speak at Ilan Pappe Seattle Talk

Tuesday, September 13th, 2011

pappe rosenblum eventContinuing his intrusive intervention into the local and regional political environment, Israel’s Pacific NW consul general, Akiva Tor, strongly urged St. Mark’s Cathedral to allow him to speak at an event featuring Israeli new historian, Ilan Pappe and American Friends of Peace Now founder, Mark Rosenblum.  They will speak on at Town Hall’s Great Hall in Seattle on Monday, September 19th at 7PM.  Those of you following this blog know that Tor and Stand With Us were instrumental in ginning up a lawsuit against the Olympia food coop after it endorsed a boycott of Israeli food products.  It seems Tor is continuing in his ways with this chutzpadik attempt to force his way into the St. Mark’s program.

In the e-mail below, which Tor and American Jewish Committee chair Wendy Rosen sent to a Church official, note how he describes Rosenblum’s political beliefs:

I wanted to request the opportunity to take part in the panel you are organizing on “Israel and Palestine’s Future: Why is Navigating a Two State Solution So Difficult?” The reasons I ask to take part are the following.

Firstly, the topic is an excellent one. It is indeed perplexing that 18 years after the Oslo Accords, an Israeli-Palestinian peace treaty had not been concluded even though it is in the strong  self-interest of both peoples. This is a topic that needs to be unpacked and analyzed by any group of people that wants to help and achieve peace between the two peoples.

Second, I think it is really necessary in such a conversation to hear the perspective of the Israeli mainstream. Professor Pappe is an important academic but represents a non-Zionist view on the far left of Israeli politics.  Professor Rosenblum is an important proponent of the Zionist Israeli peace camp which is a valued viewpoint, but not presently at the helm of Israeli politics today, where the general position is more cautious and frankly, somewhat depressed, about the prospects for peace in the immediate future. Ideally, the panel would include a Palestinian Authority perspective as well, although Professor Pappe may approximate this position.

In any case, I just think it is very important that you hear and better understand the thinking from the main body of the Israeli body politic. I would present the positions of the Israeli government, but would also try to present to the best of my understanding the thinking of the majority of the Israeli public today. I know the Bishop’s Committee holds strong positions on the conflict,  and wants to play a helpful role in its resolution – and I think hearing where Israel stands and how it understand the meaning of the Arab Spring and the current state of Israel-Palestinian relations would be helpful in your endeavor.

Thirdly, I happen to be in Seattle on September 19th  and therefore hasten to embrace the chance to engage with you.

Now, can you imagine the U.S. ambassador to Israel going to an Israeli sponsor of a conference about American politics and demanding the right to be added to a panel which includes two Israelis discussing the issue?  Why would he do this?  Why wouldn’t he simply allow Israelis to discuss American politics and let it go at that?  Note as well, how Tor distinguishes between the views of Rosenblum, a quite distinguished liberal Zionist supporter of Israel and his own views, supposedly representing the “majority of the Israeli public.”

Tor neglects to mention that on September 18th, the day before, and in the same venue, former Jerusalem Post military affairs correspondent, Hirsh Goodman will be speaking.  If Goodman doesn’t represent a mainstream Israeli point of view then no one does.  So, in essence Israel’s consul general is saying that it’s not enough to balance a program critical of Israel with one supportive of Israel on successive days, U.S. churches must actually balance every program they host with the voice of Israel’s hardline rightist government.

Not to mention that we’re supposed to accept the specious view that Israel’s current government represents the thinking of the majority of the Israeli public.  That would be akin to claiming that George Bush’s policies represented the majority of Americans during his presidency.  What is true is that Bibi Netanyahu managed to pull together a coalition in Knesset allowing him to form a government.  It didn’t mean that the majority of Israelis support his pro-Occupation, anti-Palestinian policies (though certainly many do).

Surely, one of Tor’s most important purposes is combatting the (in his view) noxious propaganda offered by an anti-Zionist like Pappe (who he actually calls “an important academic” while biting his tongue), who was hounded from his academic appointment at the University of Haifa by right-wing campus inquisitors.  The current Holy Grail concept for the Israeli far-right is “delegitimization,” and Pappe is a king of them all.  They likely want to bird-dog him around the world at every speaking engagement he has, just as they bird-dogged Reps. Keith Ellison and Brian Baird before the traveled to Gaza in 2009.

I find Tor’s behavior in Seattle simply beyond chutzpah (sorry, Alan).  By what right does an official of a foreign government get the right to say he should be heard whenever Israel fears the contents of a program sponsored in this country?

Thankfully, the local church committee organizing the event politely declined the consul’s offer of participation, but said it was willing to continue a dialogue with him on these issues.

In his response, Tor made clear that he was eager to inveigle his way into the local discourse on Israel-Palestine within the St. Mark’s church community:

I’m disappointed, as we view the Palestinian diplomatic effort at the United Nations as deeply counterproductive to a negotiated peace and it would probably be important for such a viewpoint to at least be presented at an open and meaningful discussion on the topic.

In any case, I would welcome the opportunity to meet with the Bishop’s Committee or with an audience constituted by you at a future, hopefully not too distant, time. Please let me know at your convenience when might be a good occasion and venue.

You do have to hand it to Tor.  He’s a nervy sorta guy.  It takes guts to want to butt your way into the Seattle progressive church community when hardly anyone in it has a good word to say about Israel’s current policies.  But once a flack, always a flack.  I have a feeling that Israeli diplomats earn points for the most unlikely venues to have done hasbara.  Speaking from the altar of one of Seattle’s premier progressive churches would earn Tor big points back home at Hasbara Central (aka the Israeli foreign ministry).

Seattle Times and Jewish Forward on Tikun Olam and Leibowitz Story

Tuesday, September 13th, 2011

More interesting follow-up on the New York Times report about my work on the Leibowitz story.  The Seattle Times profiled me in an article published today.  One important element of this story is an interview with former Rep. Brian Baird, one of two Congress members monitored by Jewish community leaders before they took a trip to Gaza in the aftermath of Operation Cast Lead.  Baird wasn’t surprised at how he was treated:

“I rather assumed something like that was happening,” said Baird, who since has left Congress. “If we were indeed labeled anti-Israel, that’s unfortunate. There’s an attitude that anyone who questions Israel is anti-Israel. I find that anti-American.”

Jonathan Martin also quoted this evaluation of my work published in Haaretz:

Haaretz, Israel’s leading liberal newspaper, described Silverstein’s blog as an “international message board for reports that Israel’s courts and military censor withhold from publication…”

The Jewish Forward also published its own profile today which was remarkably fair considering how complicated my relationship has been in the past with its publisher, Jane Eisner.  The one ironic thing about the profile is that it quotes Yossi Melman’s criticism of my work:

“He spreads rumors without checking them,” countered Yossi Melman, a well-connected security and intelligence reporter for Haaretz, and a critic of Silverstein’s work. “He is an ideologue, not a journalist.

“He is speculative,” Melman said. “It is like at the casino: Sometimes he gets it right, and sometimes he doesn’t.”

What is ironic?  The fact that the Haaretz passage quoted by Martin was written by none other than…Yossi Melman.  By the way, I challenged Melman specifically to disprove my claim about Ali Reza Asgari or provide any information to do so.  He declined.  Interestingly, Melman did contact me for comment after the NY Times story was published, but refused to hold back his deadline so I could actually speak with him which, though unsurprising, I felt was at best incomplete journalism.

Stand With Us and its minions are probably making hay in the comment threads of both stories, so if you’re inclined to register a comment preserving some balance in the discussion there, I’d appreciate that.

For my Israeli readers, Israeli TV will air an interesting story tomorrow about another story I developed based on the original reporting of Electronic Intifada.  A major Israeli political insider will also be interviewed and it should be fun.  Sorry I can’t reveal more, don’t want to jinx things.

Israeli Warship Violates Egyptian Waters, Captain Imprisoned

Monday, September 12th, 2011
dvora class ship

Israel's Dvora class patrol boat

Haaretz reports today a story first broken by Channel 10 news, that an Israeli navy patrol boat violated Egyptian territorial waters last week, encroaching nearly half a mile into Egypt.  Israeli censorship prevents the naming of the country whose waters were violated.  But an Israeli source confirms that it was Egypt.  Israel is describing the incident as a “navigational error” on the part of the captain, who was charged, convicted and imprisoned.  The IDF is claiming that the captain corrected course when his error was caught by shore radar which directed him back to international waters.  The Haaretz report says that Egypt did not detect the violation and did not challenge the vessel.

While this explanation is possible, it’s also possible Israel wished to test Egypt’s surveillance/security systems to see how or if they might respond to an intrusion.  Of course, it’s unlikely they would imprison a ship captain for doing such an approved mission.  But who knows.  Simply the fact that an Israeli navy captain, sailing near the waters of a frontline state with extremely tense relations with Israel would make such a blunder isn’t just troubling, it’s borderline nuts.

Remember what happened a few years ago to the British naval patrol boat captured by Iran, thus causing an international incident of enormous proportions.  If you think the Egypt-Israel peace treaty hangs by a thread now, imagine what would happen if this Israeli boat had been captured.  Instead of one Gilad Shalit, imagine 30 of them in Egyptian custody.  Of course the Egyptian military would want to spirit them back to Israel as fast as possible.  But would the Egyptian popular movement permit it?

The main point of this episode is how easy it would be to light up this tinderbox and cause a war.  And a good part of the reason why conditions are so bone dry is Bibi Netanyahu’s truculent “leadership.”  He reminds me a bit of the hubris exhibited by the British forces storming the beaches at Gallipoli during WWI, only to be mown down in their thousands by superior Turkish power.  Bibi tells the nation to join with him and charge into the maw of certain defeat.  The peoples of Egypt and Turkey are arrayed against him and behind them the combined nations of the General Assembly.  No matter.  All Israel has to do is stay the course and all will end well.  Where did we hear that one before?

It’s worth noting also that two days before this incident, an Egyptian naval patrol detected an Israeli yacht in Egyptian waters.  When the private security guards and crew aboard, some of whom were Israeli and others foreigners, feared they would be boarded, they dumped their weapons overboard.  The Egyptian navy took them in for questioning.  After intercession from the Israeli foreign ministry, the security guards were released.  Though it’s possible these were more than private security guards protecting an Israeli client’s yacht from pirates, which is how the Israeli media has explained it, it’s possible the story is more or less as reported.

The Horror: Recognizing Israel Within ’67 Borders, ’500,000 Will Become Occupiers!’

Monday, September 12th, 2011

Ethan Bronner has penned one of his typical “on the one hand-on the other hand” stories about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict which make the conflict out to be a he said-she said dilemma.  But there is one interesting passage in which he describes the reception of the Palestinian plans to bring statehood before the UN this month:

French diplomats are trying to help the Palestinians shape a United Nations resolution that describes statehood on the 1967 lines, along with agreed land swaps with Israel, but slows down bilateral recognition between a Palestinian state and other nations. This is partly aimed at luring the Germans, who are unenthusiastic. Europeans say they believe that their unity in this issue is important.

Israel is horrified. To abandon Oslo, its leaders say, is to destroy any hope of negotiations, because that will rip up the legal basis for talks. If a United Nations resolution defines Palestine as within the 1967 lines, that means 500,000 Israelis will be defined as occupiers in another country. To pre-empt that, there are suggestions here to annex certain areas first or withdraw travel privileges for Palestinian officials in the West Bank.

The horror!  500,000 Israelis become occupiers overnight!  What does Israel think they were before that?  Halutzim (“pioneers”)?  As for annexing parts of the West Bank, that should go over well before an international community which already looks with deep disfavor on some of Israel’s more recent shenanigans on the world stage.

And can you imagine how well this argument from Dennis Ross and his Mini-Me, David McHale, went over with Mahmoud Abbas when they met with him last week:

Having the power to take Israeli officials to the International Criminal Court may sound appealing, they said, but it will not end the occupation and is likely to make it worse.

Someone will have to explain to me how enabling the Palestinians to take potential Israeli war criminals to court will make the Occupation worse?  By forcing Israel to be even meaner and more brutal than it already is?  And do the Americans think that this will scare the Palestinians?  That there is anything more the Israelis can do to make their lives worse than they already are and that will also dissuade them from their course?  Really, Ross.  Who do you think you’re dealing with, here?  A second rate U.S. protectorate (Israel of course, being a first rate U.S. protectorate)?

With Egypt, Turkey Lost as Israeli Allies, Where to Turn?

Monday, September 12th, 2011
bush and saudi king

Could this be Bibi next?

To Saudi Arabia, perhaps?  That’s right, the birthplace of most of the 9/11 hijackers and ancient birthplace of Islam.  A religion that Bibi, his followers, and more importantly, his father detest.  One of the most conservative monarchies in the world.  That’s where Bibi sees Israel’s next alliance according to Aluf Benn in Haaretz:

Netanyahu now hopes that Israel might be able to get close with Saudi Arabia and the other Gulf States, who also seek to block the possibility of an Arab Spring in the region. In the West, Netanyahu is hoping to circumvent Turkey by strengthening ties with Greece, Bulgaria and Romania. During his visit to the Balkans, he was shown photos and statues of national heros [sic], sent to their deaths by the Ottoman Empire. A real basis for friendship.

That, and Lieberman’s bold strategic genius in suggesting Israel offer advanced weaponry to the PKK to hurt the Turks where they live, are all that’s needed to mend all the damage Bibi’s done to Israel’s standing both in the region and world.  Doesn’t Israel have enough proxy wars going on with Iran supporting Hezbollah and allegedly Hamas.  Does it want to add to the list by angering the Turks?  Does he want Turkish warships off-loading weapons for Hamas?  Because if Israel plays with fire by sending a single bullet to the PKK, they’re liable to pay dearly for it.

So let’s see, Bibi will balance the loss of Egypt, one of the most influential states in the Arab world; and Turkey, the Muslim country whose wealth and sway are growing faster than any other in the region, if not the world; with the gain of alliances with Saudi Arabia, Greece, Bulgaria and Romania.  Really?

There is one saving grace though, that may prevent an Israeli war with Turkey.  Ben Zion Netanyahu has publicly expressed his admiration for the Ottomans, who would go into a restive village in Palestine, search out a few troublemakers and hang ‘em in the square to show people who’s boss.  With such family admiration for the Ottomans, how can Bibi go against his dad?  In fact, dad has offered such historical examples to his son as suitable ways to rein in those uppity Palestinians causing Bibi so much trouble.  So I don’t see how Bibi can well suit up against the modern heirs of the Ottomans.

Minneapolis JCRC: Brush Up Your Hasbara

Sunday, September 11th, 2011

The Minneapolis JCRC is trying to push the horse back in the barn after I reported (with the journalistic legwork of Mordecai Specktor) that its staff relayed negative information about Rep. Keith Ellison, the first Muslim-American member of Congress, to Israel’s Chicago consulate.  The Leibowitz transcripts revealed that the local JCRC brought the consulate up to date on Ellison’s travel schedule, including his leading a trade delegation to Saudi Arabia, which was viewed extremely negatively; and his participation in an upcoming post-Cast Lead tour of Gaza with Rep. Brian Baird.  The speakers in the transcript viewed the Gaza trip as antagonistic to Israel and its interests.  Clearly, the JCRC speaker viewed its proper role as monitoring the local Congressional delegation to detect any inkling of statements or activity that might harm Israel’s interests.  And in this case, Ellison’s travel schedule was viewed as proof of his hostility towards Israel.

Here is how Steve Hunegs, JCRC director, tries to weasel out of responsibility:

We were perplexed to read The American Jewish World’s internet story from September 8th repeating a two-year recollection of a Seattle-based blogger about an unnamed Jewish activist heard on a FBI wiretap claiming an affiliation with the Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota and the Dakotas (JCRC). To set the record straight, no one authorized to speak on behalf of the JCRC made the negative personal comments about Representative Keith Ellison attributed to the anonymous Jewish activist.

Hunegs isn’t quite accurate.  While I had the transcripts two years ago, I wrote blog posts about them contemporaneously and have a record of what I wrote about this matter, which confirms what I’ve claimed.  What Hunegs has is a two year-old recollection of a conversation with the Israeli consulate in Chicago.  So while Hunegs would like now to take back what was said in the transcripts (who wouldn’t?), he can’t.  Further, it may be that what was said to the Chicago consul was what the speaker thought the consul wanted to hear, and perhaps the speaker didn’t really share the extent of Israel’s negative views about Ellison.  But again, that’s not what’s on the printed page.  There was clear agreement on both sides that Ellison was bad news for Israel and American Jews.

This incident has forced Hunegs to eat humble pie and reaffirm his love and devotion to Keith Ellison which, unfortunately wasn’t as much in evidence in 2009.  So perhaps the leopard can change his spots.  But in the passage above he’s not really admitting the truth about those conversations, as I reported them based on those 2009 transcripts.  So I’m not sure he’s turned over a new leaf.  Earlier, when he released another statement in which he in effect conceded that his office did monitor Rep. Ellison on behalf of the consulate, he was speaking more honestly.

What Hunegs can do is start from here on and act and behave more fairly and carefully toward local political leaders with whom the Jewish community may have a complex relationship.  And he may want to have future conversations with the Chicago consulate on a more secure phone line.

Israel: Things Going to Hell in Hand Basket

Sunday, September 11th, 2011

porcupine

Israel's new 'porcupine policy' substitutes for real policy in aftermath of Arab Spring


Ethan Bronner wrote a story today with the deeply ironic (for him) title:Beyond Cairo, Israel Sensing a Wider Siege. Ironic, of course, because one of the major themes of the Israeli Occupation of late has been the siege against Gaza. Now it appears, the siege is staring Israel right back in the face.

Bronner’s story actually isn’t half-bad, which is a major achievement for him.  But it must’ve pained him deeply to have done so, since the story presented Israel’s status in the Middle East in a dispiriting way.  It’s almost unremittingy bleak.  Which is uncharacteristic of Bronner, who almost always tries to see the glass as half full as far as Israel is concerned.

With the storming of the Israeli embassy in Cairo yesterday, Turkey close to severing relations with Israel, and the Palestinians prepared to mount the barricades to gain statehood this month at the UN, things are looking mighty grim for Bibi Netanyahu these days.  As usual, he manages to put the shoe on the other foot by blaming everyone but himself for this predicament:

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel warned that Egypt “cannot ignore the heavy damage done to the fabric of peace.”

What Bibi fails to get into his thick skull is that with the Arab Spring, most frontline countries, with the possible exception of Jordan, no longer value the cold peace Israel has offered for decades.  With Egypt now run by a regime more prone to acknowledge popular will, and Turkey run by a government which is refusing to take s(^t from Israel, and the PA possibly awakening a least for a moment from its slumber, Israel can no longer feign shock and indignation when Arab states with whom it was ostensibly at peace take a look at the mess of porridge Israel has offered them and respond: “No thanks, we prefer the real thing.”

When I read the following quotations from Israeli diplomatic ‘sages,’ they reminded me of the sort of shoulder-shrugging statements one might’ve heard from Roman diplomats on the eve of the sacking of the city by the Germanic hordes:

“Egypt is not going toward democracy but toward Islamicization,” said Eli Shaked, a former Israeli ambassador to Cairo who reflected the government’s view. “It is the same in Turkey and in Gaza. It is just like what happened in Iran in 1979.”

A senior official said Israel had few options other than to pursue what he called a “porcupine policy” to defend itself against aggression. Another official, asked about Turkey, said, “There is little that we can do.”

Another way of looking at this sort of attitude is that it’s like a man whose bedroom catches fire.  Instead of putting out the fire, he shuts the door and moves to the living room, dons ear buds and cranks up his iPod.

Like the ancient Chinese, Israel is contemplating building yet another wall to keep the Arab hordes out, this time in Sinai.  But once again Israel refuses to learn from history.  That wall in China didn’t work.  The empire’s enemies simply went around it.

Israel, of course, has one reliable ally, the U.S.  No matter what Israel does or says, no matter how outrageous its behavior, Barack Obama seems to have fallen back on the Bush administration approach of benign neglect.  The only problem with this approach, advocated in another Times story yesterday by an administration voice that sounded like Dennis Ross’, is that benign neglect doesn’t work when both sides have lots of weapons in their hands and aren’t afraid to use them.  Such neglect will lead almost inexorably to yet another blood bath.  The question is not if, but when and where and how many [die].

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE