8 thoughts on “Shabak Charges Against Abusisi Further Debunked – Tikun Olam תיקון עולם إصلاح العالم
task-attention.png
Comments are published at the sole discretion of the owner.
 

  1. I wonder if the case is based solely on Dirar’s testimony and if they have witnesses or other evidence. Given the nature of the case, I doubt it is going to be an open court hearing with the public being able to follow the prosecution and defence, or am I wrong? In the case of a closed hearing, can the judge issue a guilty verdict even if there is a lack of evidence?

    1. The way it works is that the prosecution asks for the maximum penalty (say, life in prison). Usually, rather than go to trial, the defendant will plea bargain for a lesser charger & lesser sentence. A plea bargain relieves the State from having to produce evidence in court. A truly pernicious system, but that is the way Shabak prefers it. Defendants realize that they have virtually no chance of going free if they go to trial so they almost never elect to fight the State. If a defendant did go to trial, then theoretically the State would have to produce its evidence, but of course the court would allow it maximum flexibility & secrecy in doing so. Certainly the public would not be allowed into the trial during presentation of any sensitive evidence. They might even be able to force the entire trial behind closed doors.

  2. lol at the article ending. Actually it reminds me the famous disaster girl meme, every catastrophe is her fault…
    http://cdn0.knowyourmeme.com/system/icons/43/original/disaster-girl.jpg

    we could launch an Abusisi disaster meme as well 😉

    or even “better”, rebranding some of the infamous antisemitic 30-40’s posters (“et derriere, le juif”) with Abusisi picture so the ridicule of the whole affair would be widely exposed/spread in all its “glory”…

    using stuff like that as source pictures :
    http://chan.archivesnationales.culture.gouv.fr/sdx-23b1-20090531-chan-pleade-2/sdx/api-url/getatt?app=fr.gouv.culture.archivesnationales.chan.pleade&base=fa&id=FRDAFANCH0098_72AJ_2_d0e13711-image-4972

    1. In fact, I have it on good authority that Hamas was behind the destruction of the Second Temple. Even Hitler consulted w Abusisi before he inaugurated the Final Solution. An Eternal Enemy of the Jewish people.

  3. RE: “Commenters here and at pro-Israel blogs have been trumpeting false claims regarding the academic record of Palestinian security detainee.” – R.S.
    MY SNARK: “Sticks and stones may break our bones, but facts will never sway us.” ~ Neocon Creed

  4. Konstantin and Petr are among most frequent Russian and Ukrainian names, consequently the number of Konstantin Petroviches is large in any field. Perhaps Konstantin can be nicknamed Kenny?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share via
Copy link