19 thoughts on “New Mossad Chief Makes Nice to Brits – Tikun Olam תיקון עולם إصلاح العالم
task-attention.png
Comments are published at the sole discretion of the owner.
 

  1. Unfortunately the law making changes to British use of universal jurisdiction has already gone through. It was debated and passed on 13th December. The relevant bit is section 151 of the Police Reform Bill, if you want to look up the debate in ‘Hansard’ and see Theresa May insisting that the change has nothing to do with Israeli pressure. Now the Direction of Public Prosecutions has to be consulted before an arrest warrant can be issued. I expected nothing else – it was an election pledge of the Tories, after all. The hope was that Nick Clegg might put up a bit of opposition, but on November 15th he made a policy U-turn and provoked a gleeful headline in the ‘Jewish Chronicle’: CLEGG ADMITS HE WAS WRONG ABOUT ISRAEL. As for David Cameron, the PM himself, he is an official member of Conservative Friends of Israel.

    I see that the Foreign and Commonwealth Office is still offering some pointed advice about the inadvisability of British travellers in Israel handing over their passports to third parties, ‘including Israeli officials’, so it evidently believes passport cloning to be a threat. I will keep my eye on that page and see if it changes. I expect that the FCO will retain this advice.

    1. I’m so sorry to have missed that development. It deserved a post draped in black mourning ribbon for the demise of a small part of British legal tradition. So Pardo’s return to England where he can’t be threatened now w. an arrest warrant, can be seen as a thank-you to the Tories & their SD enablers for providing Israeli officials impunity. How sad.

  2. Travelling killers cannot be arrested anymore, and they cannot be brought to the ICC in Den Haag, NL.

    The US-Army is allowed to “liberate” their killers by forcefull invasion of a independant country, the Netherlands…

  3. The DPP has to be consulted, but his decisions are subject to judicial review, as former deputy Prime Minister is applying for judicial review of the perverse decision not to prosecute (for illegal phone hacking) Andy Coulson, a Rupert Murdoch stooge and now David Cameron’s right hand man.

    So, if the DPP refuses to act on an international warrant, we can apply for judicial review of that decision.

    It’s not as if Mossad were not second on the suspect list for the murder of Gareth Williams, either.

    Today’s Mail on Sunday leader on THAT subject would not have been very comfortable reading for David Cameron.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1341627/MAIL-ON-SUNDAY-COMMENT-No-leaks-spy-Gareth-Williams–just-truth.html

    which arose out of:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1341571/MI6-spy-Gareth-Williams-secret-double-identity-gay-friend-insists.html

    Medawar’s contempt for David Cameron grows by the day, and his craven stance on these matters is exceeded in the visceral nausea stakes only by a proposal to erect a statue/idol of Antony Charles Lynton Blair in the House of Commons.

  4. As a progressive European, I support the need of Iran to develop nuclear weapons to deter zionist adventurism. The recent bus poster escapade shows that Amerika is not such a democracy either

    1. The fact is though that Iran is not developing nukes and has no rationale for them. Why hasn’t anyone attacked yet? No nuke deterrent needed. Not a 20-30 year old delivery device either. The context of all this has been shifted to a lie yet again. I agree with your last sentence. They are pushing the propaganda hard in Germany as of late.

    2. Progressive? I’ve yet to meet a progressive person who has any suppoort at all for nuclear weapons to be held by any country.

  5. Very keen analysis of the reach of Mossad within Iran. The problem with trusting terrorist groups to do your bidding is two fold:
    (1) they become loose cannon carriers of your will and reputation, representing you in ways that you may not want to be represented, and against powerful foes; and,
    (2) the terrorists themselves are nervous of a bigger ally and will consistently (as history shows) plot to overthrow the ally, too, once all is said and done.

    The MKO/MEK/NCRI/Mujahedin-e Khalq is so foaming at the mouth that they make Avigdor Lieberman look like Mary Poppins. Their quest for power in Iran led them to side with Saddam to kill their own countrymen. What allegiances does this Islamo-Marxist cult have? Alliances based on which way the ephemeral political winds are blowing are unwise.

  6. “According to Thomas, he [Tamir Pardo] will promise never to abuse British passports again in such an Israeli
    operation. ”

    He is not lying. The key word is “such.” Every operation is different….

  7. What does the UK get from being nice to Israel? How many Israeli divisions are depolying to Afghanistan to replace NATO troops?

    Likewise, what does that tee-shirt mean that says “Don’t worry, America…Israel is behind you!”, showing a picture of a US fighter-bomber with Israeli markings? Is this a cynical joke?

    Am I supposed to feel comforted every time I see a NYC bus with an “attack Iran” advertisement?

    If Americans are supposed to feel reassured that Israelis will cheer us on into Iran, just what, to repeat, do the British get? A football/soccer player?

    1. Perhaps they’ve taken David Cameron for a complete Shmuck, if that’s the word? (Whatever the Hebrew is for the East Yorkshire, “twannock”.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *