Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘uri blau’

Israeli Rights Activists File Complaint Against IDF Deputy Chief, Accusing Him of ‘Crimes’ and ‘Immorality’

Tuesday, November 30th, 2010
gen yair navel

Gen. Yair Naveh's promotion called 'immoral' by Israeli rights activists (Yonatan Shaul)

Alongside the newly named IDF chief of staff, Yoav Galant, his new deputy chief will be Gen. Yair Naveh.  Naveh has the distinction of being responsible for the Palestinian targeted killings which Anat Kamm leaked to Haaretz journalist, Uri Blau.  These West Bank murders completely contravened Supreme Court rulings which directed that such assassinations be avoided if there were civilians present and likely to be harmed; or if there were non-violent means available to apprehend the suspects.

Maariv quotes Naveh’s reply to this claim:

“Stop bothering me with the rulings of the Supreme Court.  I don’t know when they apply and when they don’t.  I do know that targeted killings work and prevent terror attacks.  I take my orders from the operations command [and not human rights activists].”

When asked by Blau: “Why do you approve beforehand an attack on an unidentified target [an innocent bystander],’ Naveh answered: ‘These are questions you shouldn’t direct to me.  These matters are approved at the level of the prime minister and what is done is done.  Generally, this bunch [Palestinian militants] pals around with a nasty bunch, not with nice people.”

That’s the level of strategic doctrine and tactical sophistication in the IDF high command.  If you spend time with a Palestinian militant you’re as good as dead.  It doesn’t matter if you’re his mother, wife, daughter or grandmother.  You’re as good as being a killer yourself.  This is precisely the reason that human rights activists are so eager to bring killers like Naveh to justice.  He’s pulling a Dick Cheney thumbing his nose at the notion of accountability, basically daring the world to throw Ehud Olmert into the Hague docket with him.

You will find that once an IDF general is detained abroad and brought to justice that Israel will all of a sudden discover its own conscience just as it has in the aftermath of the storm of bad PR that beset it thanks to the Goldstone Report.  Israel currently whitewashes such crimes committed on its behalf by its generals.  The only way to affirm the concept of accountability is for an international body to ring Israel’s bell and give it a moral wake up call.

Among the other peculiarities of Naveh’s previous IDF service were the lax security procedures within Naveh’s office which allowed Kamm to obtain 2,000 secret documents, which she offered to Blau because she believed that doing so would prove that war crimes had been committed by his command.

Naveh has the additional distinction of being CEO of the Jerusalem light rail project, for which he urged gender-segregated seating in order to a mollify ultra-Orthodox Jews who might otherwise shun this form of public transportation.  Instead of understanding the violation of human rights and dignity that such a prohibition would inflict on women, Naveh couched his position in terms of going the extra mile to accommodate Israel’s extreme Judaist (cf. “Islamist”) tendencies.

For this veritable festival of follies, Naveh was singled out for promotion to the second highest military position in the land.  Against this backdrop, Israeli notables like Shulamit Aloni, Uri Avnery, Alice Shalvi, Nurit Peled, and Natan Zach, and the human rights NGO, Yesh Gvul, have applied to the Supreme Court for an injunction preventing Naveh to take his position on the Palestinian killing fields, claiming his is an “immoral appointment” afflicted with profound taint.

Zach, one of Israel’s most distinguished poets, is so fed up with conditions in contemporary Israel, he stated publicly that he was ready to join a Gaza flotilla because of the brutality which has penetrated into the nation’s soul:

Not a day goes by when people are not murdered here.  The violence on the roads and in schools seeps into our lives due to the Conquest (“Occupation”).

Hey, MSM: What Are We, Chopped Liver?

Monday, November 15th, 2010

chopped liverThis post is a meditation on the relationship between blogs and the mainstream media in this narrow niche of the blogosphere related to the Arab-Israeli conflict.    What are we to them?  What are they to us?  Do we want to join ‘em?  Can we even if we wanted to?  Do we want them to join us?  Would they even if they could?  Do we want to write for ‘em?  Is it worth the trouble?  Will they come to us anyway if our reporting is vital and exclusive enough?

I’m like most ambitious political bloggers…I have a strong point of view and I not only want my readers to know it, but I want to reach the broadest possible audience.  And in my case I want to do this not only here, but in Israel and really anywhere in the world that the conflict is major political currency.  I relish my opportunities to commune with a larger audience.  Until a year ago or so, I had a semi-regular gig doing that at Comment is Free.  When that ended, I had a short-lived gig at Al Jazeera English until Firas Atrachi left his editor’s job there.  For some time after those outlets stopped being interested in my work, I was not only frustrated and upset, I aggressively sought out other opportunities.  I even got as far as a kill fee (but only after I asked for it upon rejection) for a piece commissioned by the London Review of Books!

And don’t get me wrong, I would go a long way for such gigs.  But I’ve developed a grudging acceptance that my place may not be in the more MSM (and within this I unfortunately include the progressive media outlets which also uniformly have rejected my work).  At least not as a bylined author.  There may be many reasons for this.  Maybe they’re important and worth cogitating about and maybe not.

In at least two recent instances, editors asked me to write pieces on spec for them without making any commitment that it would be published.  I turned them down.  I think those days are over.  Gee, it would be nice to be published in a certain progressive national Jewish journal, but not if it first requires a crapshoot, not knowing if what I slave over will end up in print or in someone’s Deleted Items folder.  Either it’s because I’m somehow beyond that or now I have the bully pulpit of this blog in a way I didn’t have until recently (more on this in the following paragraph).

Just because something I want like publication in the mainstream doesn’t happen doesn’t leave me by the wayside.  In some sense, since the Anat Kamm story, I have found a focus for my work that I did not have previously.  Now I understand that one of my most important contributions (thanks to an important collaborator) will be in tracking the vicissitudes of Israeli democracy through the particular lens of national security and its intelligence services.  Who watches the spooks?  In Israel, not terribly many.

But let’s return to how this post originated: I spend more time promoting this blog on Facebook than on Twitter since it seems to generate more traffic and more readers appear to be on Facebook and interact with the blog from it.  So last night, I did something I do very rarely.  I reviewed those 475 Twitter followers I have.  And I was struck by something interesting.  Quite a number of them were journalists.  Yes, some were NGO staffers, one even a retired CEO of a major medical technology company, another a Jewish federation executive, and pretty dubiously the SecyClintonBlog (NOTE: sincere apologies to Stacy Beam, who created this blog, which has no affiliation with the State Dept., and who does not approve of Clinton’s approach to the I-P conflict).

But the journalists were what interested me since I’d already noticed a number of journalists who subscribed to this blog.  One of most unlikely ones would appear to be the Israel correspondent for a certain American cable news company that is extremely fair and balanced.  Not sure what she expects to find here unless perhaps stories that she can tell her New York bosses she would never cover.

Well, perhaps that subscriber is a bit more likely than the assistant coach for a certain NBA team that recently deserted Seattle (no fault of his, I might add) for greener pastures.  I was also tickled that during my coverage of the Uri Blau-Anat Kamm story, Haaretz editor Dov Alfon started following my Tweets.  I have no way of knowing whether this is true (though someone I respect who is quite cautious about these matters affirmed his conviction that it is true), but Alfon may possibly also have posted a critical comment on my coverage here using the rather elegant nom de plume of Schockentchick (as in “apparatchik”), which I at first glance misread as “Schocken chick,” leading me to wonder why a female Haaretz reporter would refer to herself in such an odd way.

Others that are more standard and follow this blog in some fashion include reporters for the BBC, The Independent, Haaretz, Jerusalem Post (and even a very senior editor, sha-shtill!), Time Magazine, Maan News, 7th Eye, PRI’s The World, and Think Progress.

While I was looking over this list I thought to myself: instead of following me, why don’t you actually incorporate more of my point of view into your reporting?  When you look at some of the most prominent correspondents for the more reputable publications and look at who their informants are it makes one’s eyes glaze over.  Yesterday, I linked to a piece by Josh Rogin at Foreign Policy on the settlement freeze extension negotiation.  Who was his main informant?  Robert Wexler.  I kid you not.  Wexler was Obama’s Florida’s Jewish errand boy for the last election campaign and left Congress nearly two years ago and for some reason is still a valued commentator.  Not that I would begrudge Wexler if he had anything in the least illuminating to say.  But it was the same standard, boring, soft-core drivel that you hear over and over from Administration hacks (or was that “flacks?”) who are spinning for one master or another.

Ethan Bronner too has been a pet peeve of mine in these pages as someone who drones on and often producing neither heat nor light.  Why are these people afraid of introducing into the mix viewpoints less often heard?  Of course, part of the reason is that the reporters themselves have a very limited range of vision for their subject and therefore naturally wouldn’t even think that a more challenging voice should be incorporated into the mix.

I should take a modest step back here to acknowledge that since I’ve begun reporting more intensively on Israeli intelligence matters my blog has been picked up more widely in sources like the N.Y. Times and all the major Israeli publications with the exception of the erstwhile liberal one, Haaretz (go figure).  I’ve been interviewed and/or profiled by media in Switzerland, Turkey, Russia, and Israel.  In a sense I even owe that hated emblem of Iraq-era reporting, Judith Miller, a major shout out.  She discovered my reporting on Anat Kamm and featured it in The Daily Beast.  Yes, I’m sorry to say that at times in this day and age it requires a celebrity journalist to really break a story.  And sometimes you even learn to trust a reporter whose politics you may disagree with to do the right thing on this particular story.  Had she not taken this up, the Israeli press wouldn’t have reached a critical mass of publicly-expressed ridicule that led to the Shabak relenting on Kamm’s gag order.  Had they not done so, who knows whether Kamm might still be under secret detention facing a life sentence.

Another post that spurred some of my thinking on this was Phil Weiss’ report of a talk given by the estimable Israeli blogger and freelance journalist, Noam Sheizaf of Promised Land.  Noam seems to really be feeling to power of his own blog to impact the public political and media discourse, which led him to say (I’m including some of Phil’s set-up):

He [Noam] told us of his own success. Reporters at the New York Times and Politico follow him on twitter; this would have been incomprehensible to him as a young journalist, that he would ever have that type of influence inside the Beltway:

“And this is what I wanted, to have a political impact. Blogging is not just reporting, it is engaged reporting. We are engaged in an internal battle in Israel. I’m using these tools of facebook and twitter to push something…

“I live-blogged [the flotilla] for four days from the Hebrew media. Traffic to my site went up ten times. [It took the IDF five hours to get out its version of the story.] And those five  hours framed much of how the story was handled and Israel has done damage control since then. And I understand why Hamas has said, the flotilla is better than 10,000 rockets.”

Sheizaf’s pieces have been linked by the The Washington Post and The New York Times, but those links are chopped liver next to Glenn Greenwald. “When Glenn Greenwald said, go to this guy on Twitter– Glenn Greenwald is like a mega important person on the net, who is hardly known in the mainstream… Social media changes everything in the game.”

I should make clear that while I’m very sympathetic to Noam’s narrative and believed it at one time myself (and in fact, wrote a chapter, The Blogging Wars, for the Independent Jewish Voices book, A Time to Speak Out, on precisely this subject making almost precisely this claim), I’m no longer so sure he’s right.  Or at least, not so sure he’s right in the way he thinks he is.

Yes, as bloggers we are earning a larger share of the “pie” of public attention for our reporting.  This is happening, in my estimation, because of the desperation of current political circumstances which are turning both the MSM and their normal readers to new and different alternative sources.  It’s also happening because more and more the mainstream reporters don’t have the goods and we do.  We’re breaking stories that either they used to break, or that they can’t break, or that their editors have no interest in letting them break.

But I’m not sure that we’re really impacting the MSM in any real or serious way.  That we’re impacting the overall discourse, of that I am sure.  But really how much does having a NY Times or Politico reporter follow you on Twitter indicate in terms of whether you’re penetrating the Beltway political haze?  And yes, Glenn Greenwald, when he does report on the conflict does excellent work, but he hardly seems engaged in any serious way with the work of those of us who are on the firing line doing this sort of original reporting.  That Greenwald plugged Noam’s Twitter feed is terrific.  But how much does it all mean?

So, my main question to all of you is what do we as bloggers with distinctive, important political voices  rarely heard in the mainstream want from them?  What do we have the right to expect?  And how should we go about getting it?  My conviction is that there is now a critical mass of progressive blog reporting on the Israeli-Arab conflict that deserves wider circulation and prominence.  Some of us like Ali Abunimah seem to make their own breaks and turn their operations into spectacularly successful platforms to disseminate their perspective.  Others of us seem to fight and struggle for every scrap of recognition that comes our way.  My question is how do we do more of the former and less of the latter?  How do we make those breaks for ourselves? Or will those breaks come to those of us who, to parapharse Milton, serve by standing and waiting, all the while doing the hard slog of reporting those stories that no one else can, or knows how to report?

Barak Appoints IDF Deputy Chief of Staff Who Violated Supreme Court Ruling on Targeted Killings, Advocated Segregating Women on Jerusalem Light Rail

Monday, October 4th, 2010
yair naveh accused war criminal

Yair Naveh: next IDF deputy chief of staff (Daniel Bar On)

Defense Minister Ehud Barak today appointed as new IDF deputy chief of staff, Maj. Gen Yair Naveh.  Naveh is notorious for ordering targeted assassinations of unarmed Palestinian militants in defiance of a Supreme Court ruling, then lying about it.  His command also observed such slipshod security arrangements that Anat Kamm easily managed to copy several hundred secret documents which she passed on to Uri Blau.  In most other self-respecting western militaries, Naveh would have faced disciplinary charges for such a lackadaisical approach.  Finally, Naveh has been director general of the Jerusalem light rail project, who polled Jerusalem residents about their interest in practicing gender segregation on the new mass transit system.  When the poll came to light, Naveh defended the notion:

“The train was built to serve everyone,” Naveh said in defense of his proposal, adding, “I think it is necessary to create alternatives for everyone.” In his view, “It is not a problem to declare every third or fourth car a mehadrin [super-kosher] car.”

Now, can we say that this surprises us given the IDF’s record of wholesale violation of Supreme Court rulings and Palestinian human rights?  No.  Barak himself is a willing participant in this system and has personally murdered unarmed Palestinians in their beds himself.  But I must say it does give one pause.  Is this the image that Israel wishes to project to the world?  Of naming to a top command someone who is a cold blooded killer and law-breaker, who practices virtually non-existent security procedures in his own office, and who is willing to violate the civil rights of women to curry favor with the ultra-Orthodox who make up a significant portion of Jerusalem’s population?

I look forward to a time when Naveh is brought before the Hague and perhaps Barak will be joining him there along with Palestinian militants who’ve killed Israeli civilians in cold blood.  They deserve each other.

Seattle Conference: Gaza Humanitarian Crisis

Sunday, June 27th, 2010

Yesterday night, 200 people joined us for the conference I initiated, Gaza’s Humanitarian Crisis: the Failure of U.S. Policy. I was delighted with the turnout and the quality of the talks by Steve Niva, David Schermerhorn, and Hazim Shafi.

This event was, in a way, a sequel to an event I organized last December on the Iran nuclear crisis and the failure of U.S. and Israeli policy in that arena.

When you blog as intensively as I do about the Israeli-Arab conflict and face an especially severe crisis, you want to do something more than just write a blog post. You want to go into your community and reach people where they live; motivate them to do something on behalf of sanity, justice and human decency.

That’s why I approached Brenda Bentz of SABEEL of Puget Sound with my idea, which she graciously supported along with St. Mark’s Cathedral, which provided the venue. I am sorry to say that Seattle’s Jewish community is not yet ready to confront these issues by hosting such a panel. Though through some lobbying of my own, the JTNews sent a reporter to the event and there will be a story about it in the next issue. I understand there were four “operatives” from Stand With Us in attendance as well. Undoubtedly, they were seeking proof that we were propagating “anti-Israel” propaganda.

Below, I’m going to post my own remarks from last night. When we have video, audio, or photos available, I’ll upload that as well:

Israel Under Siege–Enforces Consensus, Jettisons Democracy

I have the unenviable task of telling you tonight about the state of the State of Israel.  In short, it’s not good.  I’ve been following Israeli politics since I was a teenager in 1967 and I don’t think I’ve ever felt more alarmed and depressed about what is happening within Israel.

We all knew when Bibi Netanyahu became prime minister that we were in for a far-right government.  But sad to say I think we were spoiled by the more centrist governments that preceded them.  We thought that since both Ariel Sharon and Ehud Olmert were former Likud political leaders that Bibi would perhaps be a slightly more conservative version.

But Bibi has been a revelation, and not a good one.  Under his rule, the Israeli peace and human rights community have come under fire as never before.  The leader of the New Israel Fund, a relatively tame advocate of Israeli civil society and democracy, was vilified in all the major Israeli newspapers in an ad displaying a caricature of her with a rhino horn sprouting from her forehead.  It was an ugly display worthy of some of the lowest propaganda of the Nazi anti-Semitic publication, Der Shturmer.

A few months ago, Uri Blau, an Israeli journalist writing for Haaretz was forced into exile because he received secret documents from an IDF soldier named Anat Kamm.  These memos documented major military violations of an Israeli Supreme Court ruling barring targeted killings of Palestinian militants who could be apprehended non-violently.  Not only did the Israeli intelligence service, Shabak, threaten to prosecute Uri Blau, Haaretz’s military correspondent now residing in London, they did prosecute Kamm, threatening her with a life sentence.  Essentially, this woman is an Israeli Daniel Ellsberg, yet she faces calls from the Israeli far-right for hanging.

An Israeli Palestinian Knesset member, Haneen Zoabi, joined the Gaza flotilla and sailed on the ill-fated Mavi Marmara.  If she’d been a regular Israeli citizen she could’ve been arrested and imprisoned for her action.  Luckily for her, she had parliamentary immunity.  When she returned to the Knesset, right-wing MKs called her a traitor and killer.  She arose to defend herself and all hell broke loose.  A Jewish female Knesset member lunged at her and would’ve taken her down if she hadn’t been restrained by Knesset security.  Everyone knows how fractious and dysfunctional the Israeli parliament can be.  Many of us have seen the shouting matches and bad behavior.  But this was a different order of magnitude.  Even an Israeli TV newscaster called it a “near-lynching.”

The Israeli security apparatus has gone to war against Israeli Palestinian political leaders.  This goes back to an announcement in 2007 by Yuval Diskin, Shin Bet chief, that he planned to wage all-out combat against Palestinian nationalists.  He viewed even legal political activities that advanced views that were detrimental to the notion that Israel was solely a Jewish state, as anathema.  He made clear as part of this crusade, he would pull out all the stops.  And he has done so.

In the past month, the Shin Bet arrested the director of an Israeli Palestinian NGO named Ameer Makhoul.  They came to his Haifa apartment in the dead of night, ransacked it, and confiscated all the electronic equipment in it, including cell phones and computers belonging to his teenage daughters.  They slapped a gag order on his arrest.  No Israeli reporter could say what had happened to Makhoul.  He essentially disappeared into the maw of the secret police.

One of my jobs as a blogger is to break such gag orders and I’m pleased to say that with the help of Israeli sources I did.  After my reporting, we knew who had been arrested.  We found out about the preposterous charges against him, that he had consorted with known Hezbollah agents and offered to spy against his country.

The identity of the alleged Hezbollah agent was also under gag order.  But I broke that too and revealed that Hassan Jaja was so dangerous that he was a landscape designer and nurseryman in Amman who ran an Arab environmental NGO.

Despite the ludicrousness of the charges, this didn’t stop the Shin Bet from torturing Makhoul during the three weeks when they held him incommunicado, preventing access to his lawyers or family.  He was deprived of sleep, tied to a chair that was bolted to the floor and forced to confirm a narrative that his interrogators dictated to him.  It reminds me of a Teheran show trial.

This is how low Israel has gone.  In an effort to combat the international campaign to hold Israel accountable for its actions its actions in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead, the nation has inflicted upon itself and the rest of the world a sort of pathological madness.

It called Judge Richard Goldstone, author of the UN report on the war, a traitor to his people.  Accused him of a blood libel against Israel.  Accused him of being a moser, a Jew who during the Holocaust ferreted out Jews in hiding and betrayed them to the Gestapo.  They tarnished Goldstone’s record as a South African anti-apartheid judge by comparing him to Josef Mengele.

Some of us attended the last SABEEL conference held here in this Cathedral and heard Israeli Professor Neve Gordon’s address.  He, several months ago, electrified observers of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by publicly expressing his support for the global BDS movement in the Los Angeles Times and The Guardian.  For this, he too was excoriated.  The president of Ben Gurion University where he teaches, claimed he had crossed a red line that no professor had a right to cross, doing damage to the State.  Israelis across the political spectrum attempted to make the case that academic freedom did not entitle someone to speak ill of Israel or Zionism.  They suggested not so subtly Gordon might be happier living elsewhere (a fate that befell Ilan Pappe and Tanya Reinhardt).

Ben Gurion’s President Carmi essentially said she would fire Gordon if she could.  But of course she couldn’t since there is such a thing as academic freedom still honored in Israel.

Add to this, the fact that a British trustee of Ben Gurion told a Jewish newspaper that Prof. David Newman, a colleague of Gordon’s should die because he criticized Israeli policy in a British TV documentary.  140 faculty members protested to the president about the trustee’s irresponsible statement and she promptly ignored them.

Speaking of dying, last week Neve Gordon received a bona fide death threat from an anonymous source, calling him a traitor and warning him that the writer would come to the campus and kill him.  While Pres. Carmi denounced the act, she also in effect blamed Gordon for bringing it on himself by his “irresponsible” behavior.

In light of the repression and paranoia I’ve outlined above, it isn’t surprising that the IDF perpetrated the debacle it did on the Mavi Marmara.  I don’t know exactly what happened.  But in the most charitable interpretation I imagine that after it faced resistance from some passengers and the belief among the assault team that some members were captured, I believe there was a general breakdown in unit discipline and chaos ensued.  While I don’t believe the IDF planned to execute anyone and engage in cold blooded murder, the stage was certainly set by spokespeople who threatened that Israel was prepared to use force to prevent the ships from reaching Gaza.

Now, a word on the Israeli investigation of this disaster.  In short, it too is a disaster.  Netanyahu has appointed three Israelis and two foreign “observers.”  The panel is chaired by Yaakov Tirkel, a 75 year old retired Supreme Court justice who has said publicly that he holds the honor of the IDF above “the enemy.”  The justice is known for siding with the government on national security cases.  Another Israeli panelist is Amos Horev, an 86 year-old retired general who, in 1943, was accused of castrating a Palestinian villager who sexually harassed a Jewish woman.  The third member is Shabtai Rosenne, a 94 year-old former diplomat who counseled the Israeli prime minister after the notorious Kibya massacre orchestrated by Ariel Sharon to lie to the world by claiming that Israeli civilians perpetrated the killings and not the army.  An Israeli newspaper photographed this poor man at his home wearing the type of summer shorty pajamas worn by elderly folks and tended by his Filipino caretaker.  I call this the geriatric commission.  They should hold the sessions in a retirement home rather than a government conference room.

One of the foreign observers, Lord David Trimble, just co-founded a European pro-Israel advocacy organization whose mission is to oppose “delegitimization” of Israel within Europe.  The second observer is a former judge in the Canadian army.

In short, the fix is in.  No one really believes this body will satisfy anyone except Israel.  Haaretz has editorialized to that effect.  Ban Ki Moon has warned the commission isn’t credible.  We need a true international investigation.  Nothing less will suffice.

Now, I’d like to turn to U.S. policy.  As an American Jew and supporter of Israeli-Palestinian peace, I had high hopes of Barack Obama.  I still do.  But I’ve become doubtful that any of those hopes will ever be realized.

When faced with the intransigence of the Israeli government, whether the settlement freeze, the Goldstone Report or the Gaza flotilla massacre, the operative mode seems to be keeping things quiet and under control.  There never seems to be backbone when it’s called for.

When the Goldstone Report was first issued, the U.S. attempted to block it and threatened a Security Council veto if it was brought up there.  When Turkey and the nations of the world demanded an international investigation of the Mavi Marmara murders, the U.S. said an Israeli investigation would do.  When things got hot and heavy in the aftermath of the killings and pressure mounted to end the Gaza siege, the Obama administration made do with merely easing the suffering rather than ending it completely.

This is an administration satisfied with half measures.  There are times when half-measures may work to quiet a crisis if it isn’t terribly severe.  But we’re way past severe when it comes to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.  The situation calls for backbone, for perseverance, for fortitude.  Instead we get waffling, and zig-zagging.

Finally, I want to note that today is the fourth anniversary of the capture of IDF soldier Gilad Shalit by Palestinian militants.  During that time, there have been negotiations between Israel and Hamas over his fate.  Essentially, the latter demanded the release of several hundred jailed Palestinians.  Israel balked.  While everything about the case is veiled in a fog, from what I’ve read the sides were close to agreement a number of times.  But negotiations foundered over which detainees would be released and how many.  Israel balked when faced with the prospect of releasing those with blood on their hands.

I want Gilad Shalit to return to the bosom of his family.   But I also want Israel to recognize Hamas and end its siege.  I want the residents of Sderot to be safe from Qassam rockets.  But I also want the residents of Gaza to be free from paralyzing fear and anticipation of the next war.

There is a way out of this mess.  The 2002 Saudi initiative proposed Arab acceptance of Israeli in return for a withdrawal to near-1967 borders.  Israel has rejected this peace plan, which is still on the table.  There is only one way to save Israel: to make peace.  Everyone knows the parameters of the future settlement.  The only question is how many will have to die before Israel comes to its senses and agrees to it.  To quote a Jewish saying: “may it happen speedily and in our day.”

Enhanced by Zemanta

Israel Plans Prosecution of Ameer Makhoul, Uri Blau

Saturday, June 12th, 2010

The Israeli prosecutor has set a June 21st trial date for Ameer Makhoul, the director of an Israeli Palestinian NGO, who is accused of plotting espionage against Israel.  I have joined an international group of human rights activists organizing on his behalf.  I’ll make public our plans in the coming days.

I wanted to add a disturbing discovery I’ve made with the help of an Israeli peace activist.  That is, the faux-left Israeli Jewish political party Meretz couldn’t give a crap about Ameer Makhoul.  When queried about the party’s position on the matter, party chair Haim Oron had this to say:

In the Anat Kamm case as in that of Ameer Makhoul, the leadership of Meretz has opposed the use of gag orders.  But regarding their arrest, since it’s not within our ability to probe these matters or to know whether there is any truth in them, we cannot make any statement about the investigation.

When the Israeli peace activist queried him further, Oron replied:

It’s not clear what sort of pubic effort should be made concerning this matter.  The police investigated and filed very grave charges.  What should be done?  To join those who defame or those who bless [him]?  Isn’t that what courts are for?

So there you have it.  The so-called Israeli left continues to embarrass itself by betraying its values (or at least what its values should be).  As my Israeli friend wrote: “Is it any wonder they’ve gone from 12 Knesset seats to three in recent elections?”  What do they represent besides furthering their own measly existence at any price.  I wouldn’t even say they sold out.  There was very little to sell.  They simply petered out due to a lack of conviction and intestinal fortitude.

Can you imagine Israeli civil liberties, such as they are, under deep threat with two of the most prominent prosecutions in recent memory filed and Meretz goes AWOL?  Why do  you exist if not to fight for civil liberties?  And not just the civil liberties of the good folk, but the rights of those under imminent attack. The ones smeared by the secret police.  The ones called traitor and spat upon.  The tortured ones.  These are the ones who really need you and instead you decide a nap sounds like a better option.

Oron’s reply also bespeaks a terrible insularity in Israeli politics.  Jews and their parties care about Jews.  If you’re not going to vote for them, why should they have anything to do with you?  And that’s certainly true of Makhoul and the Israeli Palestinian voting bloc who get short shrift from the likes of Meretz.

I myself queried another Meretz leader (Jewish of course) who wrote in error:

I checked, and the fact is that to my knowledge, none of the MKs, including the MKs from Balad (which I believe Amir Makhoul belongs to) and Hadash (his former party home), have raised the issue in public, for the same reason that Jumes [Oron] writes.

I saw Issam Makhoul, his brother – who was an MK for Hadash, at Saturday night’s peace demonstration in Tel Aviv organized by a coalition led by Peace Now, Meretz and Hadash, with Gush Shalom and other activist movements.

He told me that he understands that the charges will be dropped in the near future, and that nothing will come of the whole affair.

So there you have it, the Attorney General has set a trial date and Meretz leadership are fully confident charges will be dropped and nothing will come of the matter.  Do I hear burying your head in the sand?

And as for the claim that the Palestinian Israeli political parties have been silent, that too is in error.  Balad and and Muhamad Barake of Hadash have spoken out, as has Ahmad Tibi.  This proves that my Israeli Jewish interlocutor, someone active in the Jewish peace movement, is so out of touch with his Palestinian counterparts that he doesn’t even know what their response has been to the arrest and torture of Ameer Makhoul.  This is what the Israeli Jewish left has come to I’m sorry to say.  Out of touch and really couldn’t be bothered to care enough to know.

Maariv also reports today that the Israeli attorney general plans to prosecute Uri Blau for betraying a military operation.  Several months ago, Blau’s attorneys had worked out an agreement whereby he would return documents stolen by Anat Kam from the IDF and neither Kamm nor Blau would be charged.  The Shin Bet violated that agreement.

Then Anat Kamm called on Blau to return the documents and he did so.  But now the Shin Bet has upped the ante.  They demand that Blau return EVERY secret document he’s ever received (not just those from Kamm).  And that is the bone that sticks in the craw for Blau and rightfully so.

The attorney general will prosecute him without regard to his return of the documents.  An astonishing statement came from the State that the basis of Blau’s crime isn’t publishing secret documents, but merely possessing them.  So let’s parse what he’s saying: that in a so-called democracy any journalist who possesses a secret document has committed a crime.  And the mere possession of the documents damages state security and endangers life.  This is no longer democracy.  This borders on police state attitudes.

Keep in mind that what Blau did was “out” the IDF for killing unarmed Palestinian militants in cold blood and then lying about it–all in violation of Supreme Court rulings saying killing a man when you could arrest him, or when civilians are present and might be harmed,, was illegal.  In addition, Blau held documents which he didn’t publish which revealed the scorched earth military strategy that the IDF planned to execute in what became Operation Cast Lead.  THIS is what constitutes damaging state security and endangering human life: revealing war crimes.

What kind of country is this?  Have they lost any contact with the notion of democracy?  Do they not have a clue what a free press means or should mean?  American Jews, you must come to understand that your Zionist dream has been reduced to this.  What a tragedy.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Israeli MK Demands Publication of Blau Story on Cast Lead Battle Plans

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

One of the most contentious aspects of the Kamm-Blau case, which goes to the heart of why it is so dangerous for the IDF, is the article Blau wrote about the army’s battle plans for Operation Cast Lead. It passed the military censor and Haaretz planned to print it one week before the war/massacre began. The newspaper prepared the article, but then the censor had a change of heart, demanding that Haaretz withdraw the already printed edition. It did so.

Several days ago Israeli journalist Shraga Elam suggested that activists involved with this case should now demand publication of the offending article. I didn’t see any way Haaretz would jeopardize its tenuous legal situation by entertaining such a notion. While I put out feelers to Israelis to see if there might be a copy of the article lurking somewhere I got no takers.

Now, Jonathan Cook has added a new dimension to this story: an Israeli Palestinian MK has made such a demand:

Haneen Zoubi, an MP who previously headed an Israeli media-monitoring organisation, said it was “outrageous” that the suppressed report was still secret so long after the Gaza attack. She is to table a parliamentary question to Ehud Barak, the defence minister, today demanding to know why the army suppressed the article and what is preventing its publication now. Mr Barak must respond within 21 days.

She said publication of the article was important both because Israel had been widely criticised for killing many hundreds of civilians in its three-week assault on Gaza, and because subsequent reports suggested that Israeli commanders sought legal advice months before the operation to manipulate the accepted definitions of international law to make it easier to target civilians.“There must be at least a strong suspicion that Mr Blau’s article contains vital information, based on military documentation, warning of Israeli army intentions to commit war crimes,” she said in an interview.

“If so, then there is a public duty on Haaretz to publish the article. If not, then there is no reason for the minister to prevent publication after all this time.”

I wouldn’t have phrased it that way.  What Blau’s report might indicate is that the ferocity and indiscriminateness that were advocated in the war plans would convey a likelihood that war crimes could have occurred.

Cook also quotes a Tel Aviv university professor with a convincing argument about what especially frightened and provoked the IDF and Shin Bet about Blau’s unpublished manuscipt:

Amal Jamal, a professor at Tel Aviv University who teaches a media course to professional journalists, said he was concerned with the timing of the Shin Bet’s campaign against Mr Blau. He observed that they began interviewing the reporter about his sources and documents last summer as publication neared of the Goldstone report, commissioned by the United Nations and which embarrassed Israel by alleging it had perpetrated war crimes in Gaza.

“The goal in this case appears to be not only to intimidate journalists but also to delegitimise certain kinds of investigations concerning security issues, given the new climate of sensitivity in Israel following the Goldstone report.”

Given the massive investment of the government in demonizing both the Report and its author it would make perfect sense for officials to see Blau and by extension Kamm as leading aiders and abetters of the anti-Israel efforts of the UN and human rights campaigners throughout the world seeking accountability for IDF actions in Gaza. This is yet further proof that we must mount a redoubled defense of Kamm, Blau and Goldstone and the values for which they stand.  We need accountability and transparency in dealing with the aftermath of Cast Lead, not bellicosity, chest-thumping and threats (like the Shin Bet one to kidnap Blau and forcibly return him to Israel).

Cook also quotes Shraga discussing a so-called “third phase” of the Gaza operation which is rarely openly discussed by which the IDF would have occupied Gaza, expelled Hamas and organized mass expulsions of “undesirables” (some of this I have heard and some is based on Shraga’s comments).  This, if true, certainly would’ve taken the IDF into war crimes territory.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Former Israeli Attorney General Backs IDF: Targeted Killings Were Lawfu

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010
menachem mazuz

Former attorney general Menachem Mazuz, turning bilge into wine (Daniel Bar-On / BauBau)

In Operation Twin Towers, the Shin Bet directed the IDF to arrest several wanted Palestinians in Jenin.  Gen. Yair Naveh gave his men the orders that they could shoot to kill if necessary (even if civilians would be harmed) despite the fact that the Israeli Supreme Court had specifically excluded such targeted killings.  The Palestinians ended up dead.  The IDF lied and said they’d resisted arrest, when they hadn’t.  This is the explosive story that Uri Blau published in Haaretz and which led to his self-imposed exile in London.

But now we have it from an unimpeachable source that all was kosher. General Naveh is free and clear and the IDF is back to being the most moral army in the world.  Our source is none other than former Israeli attorney general Menahem Mazuz, who hastens to remind the Israeli public that he wrote a letter clearing Naveh from guilt fifteen months ago after human rights lawyers Michael Sfard and Avigdor Feldman (now representing Anat Kamm), on the strength of Blau’s report, filed a legal complaint against the IDF for the episode:

In their letter to Mazuz, the attorneys charged that Blau’s article indicated that the state had violated the ruling in connection with several killings of terrorists…Mazuz wrote back on January 7, 2009, and turned down the attorneys’ request for an investigation.

Regarding the killing of Malaisha, Mazuz wrote, “The IDF operation met all the conditions laid down in the Bagatz ruling regarding ‘targeted assassinations.’ The attack took place after the possibility of arresting the fugitives was ruled out as being impossible to achieve under the circumstances and after it was made clear to the soldiers that arrest was the first preference.

“The attack was aimed at senior and extremely dangerous terrorists, who were involved in preparations to carry out dangerous terror attacks, and regarding whom the security system had reliable and precise information … It was carried out in awareness of the duty to avoid harming innocents and reduce the danger to them, and after implementing the principle of proportionality.”

Mazuz added that “the legal aspects of the operation were examined at each one of the planning stages and there is no basis to the charge that the IDF ‘ignored’ the High Court’s instructions regarding targeted assassination operations. On the contrary, the operational officers in the general staff, who had close legal consultation, were aware of the High Court instructions and stressed and carried them out in all stages of the planning and the approval of the operation.”

And how does Mazuz know this?  He undoubtedly has it on good authority from the IDF’s prosecutor general, Avichai Mandelblit, who would not tell a lie.  This is the same Mandelblit who, when faced with international outcry concerning possible Israeli war crimes during the Gaza massacre, couldn’t seem to find a single Israeli soldier who did a thing wrong–except one poor schlub who stole a credit card from a Gaza home.  This guy they threw the book at.

If words could turn dreck to gold, then Mazuz would be rich.  Did you note the phrase “principle of proportionality?”  What does it mean when three wanted men end up dead and the IDF lies by saying they were armed and resisted arrest?  I guess it depends on how you define proportionality.  If you’re a Shin Bet director or Israeli general it’s ‘proportional’ to execute a wanted man though this might not be the standards of the Supreme Court or the rest of the world.

The IDF couldn’t even acknowledge they’d disciplined two officers for misuse of white phosphorus during the war.  After Haaretz reported they’d been reprimanded, the IDF hastened to deny the charge.

All this reminds me of the four monkeys: hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil, do no evil.  With the exception that the IDF actually did evil and these jokers are doing their level best to turn pork into what Israelis euphemistically call “white meat.”  I guess if Jesus could turn loaves into fishes then why shouldn’t an Israeli bureaucrat be able to turn an execution into a righteous deed?

The Kamm-Blau affair represents the nadir of the Israeli “democratic” system at work.  It’s close to a perfect storm of incompetence, foolishness, grandiosity, pique and Chelmishness.  No one on the government side comes out looking good including the IDF, Shin Bet, police and judiciary.  The press looks like a feeble toothless wonder.  Only the principals, Kamm and Blau come out of this with their reputations reasonably intact (except if you ask rabid rightists like those from Im Tirtzu or those who equated Kamm’s crime with the Holocaust on Yom HaShoah).  It has been a very dark month for Israeli institutions associated with this affair.  They have not performed well.

But will anyone learn from their lesson?  Ah, that is the job of this blog.  If they don’t we will try to remind them that there is a moral to the story that must be learned.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Latest Shin Bet Outrage: Threatening Eichmann-like Abduction of Blau

Monday, April 12th, 2010
yuval diskin

Yuval Diskin: will kidnap Blau to bring him to justice

Each day brings a new outrage in the Kamm-Blau case riveting Israel and much of the world.  The National reports that the Shin Bet said it would “take the gloves off” in dealing with self-exiled Haaretz reporter Uri Blau and even consider kidnapping him to forcibly return him to Israel.  Someone ought to tell this numbskull that the Shin Bet isn’t allowed to kidnap Israeli citizens on foreign soil.  And considering the hot water into which the Mossad has fallen in England these days, it’s hardly likely they’d like to mount a kidnapping operation in London.

It’s true that they did kidnap Adoph Eichmann in Argentina and Mordechai Vanunu in Rome (they would’ve kidnpapped him in London but if would’ve meant offending Margaret Thatcher), but the acts of which they were charged were of a considerably different level of magnitude.  Though I realize that for a Shin Betnik, used to always getting his man, such comparisons are meaningless.

The Shabak also said they would ask Britain to extradite him.  I have an excellent idea, why doesn’t Britain offer to trade the Mossad agents who used fraudulent British passports in assassinating Mahmoud al-Mabouh in Dubai in exchange for Blau; or better yet, exchange a wanted Israeli general for Blau?

If I were David Milliband, Britain’s foreign minister I’d let the Israeli government know in no uncertain terms that such an act, were one even considered let alone attempted, would meet with a crushingly hostile response from Her Majesty’s government.

But seriously, this is getting ridiculous.  What does the Shin Bet take Britain and the rest of the world for?  Their offshore subsidiary?  I just hope that Amos Schocken has hired a very good security agency to guard Uri.  Maybe even a few ex-Mossad or CIA agents whose loyalty can be vouched for.

We do have to take all this with a grain of salt since it was published in the right wing Maariv which has been known to publish utter Likudist rubbish.  On the other hand, given the Israeli security agency’s penchant for skullduggery, we shouldn’t rule out even the most outrageous Israeli behavior.

We should ask ourselves why the Shin Bet has practically put a price on Blau’s head.  Really, this episode is nothing out of the ordinary for Israel.  As numerous reports in the Israel press have pointed out, scores of IDF officers, secret agents and policitians have leaked top secret material to reporters before.  Even Uri Blau published an IDF document given to him by another IDF soldier.  When discovered her punished was 35 days confinement to base.

What makes this case different from all other previous Israeli leak cases?  As several Israel bloggers have provocatively pointed out (among them Roy Arad here)–Uri Blau is really in a category all his own when it comes to Israeli investigative reporters.  He goes where other reporters fear to tread.  He gets the stories no one else can.  He embarrasses the high and mighty and does so with astonishing regularity.  In short, the man has a target painted on his back as far as the Israeli military-intelligence elite is concerned.

Let’s review some of the stories he’s published just in the past year: he revealed the embarrassing, racist, genocidal IDF T-shirts worn by veterans of Operation Cast Lead (Huffington Post rejected without explanation my own submission of this story); he reported that Gaby Ashkenazi and Ehud Barak engaged in numerous business deals before they returned to government and the IDF respectively and neither reported the transactions as required; he wrote that after Barak became defense minister and claimed his personal company would become inactive, nearly $2-million poured into it and the latter refused to explain where the money came from or what the company did to earn it; Blau exposed a similar mysterious consulting business run by Avigdor Lieberman’s daughter which received millions of shekels from overseas sources (Israeli police have questioned Lieberman multiple times and are rumored to be preparing an indictment).

Any number of powerful Israelis want Uri Blau dead or alive.  And beyond prosecuting him, those he has angered want to so tarnish his repuation that no future source could ever trust him.  Imagine if Nixon went after Woodward and Bernstein and threw the entire weight of the government against them to destroy them and their journalistic reputation.  Powerful Israelis want Blau (in the coinage of the old Hollywood mogul’s threat) “never to work in this town again.”

And not just those in the political/military/intelligence establishment hate Blau.  The story of this case is also the story of the utter failure of the Israeli press to do its job.  The cowardice, the apathy, the laziness, the jealousy, the sycophancy.  Yes, some Israeli friends have pointed out to me that an Israeli paper risks far more than an American if it defies a censor of the Shin Bet.  In fact, it may risk all as Hadashot did in the Kav 300 episode.

But what they need to remember is that guarantees of a free press didn’t come naturally in this country either.  If you don’t remember your American history, look up John Peter Zenger.  There’s a publisher who Israeli media moguls ought to study.  Any Israeli newspaper on its own could not be expected to do the impossible.  But a united press could, and that’s what’s utterly lacking in Israel.

Uri Blau’s fellow newspapermen hate him, as this Haaretz op-ed by human rights lawyer Yuval Elbashan notes, because he does the kind of job they all should be doing but aren’t:

They were supposed to be the vanguard that protects Haaretz reporter Uri Blau on his journalistic mission. They were supposed to be at the forefront of the army protecting the freedom of expression, which also includes the journalistic liberty to possess leaked documents, whatever their origin.

As such, they were supposed to be the first to condemn the heavy-handed behavior of the Israeli security services…Their experience should have taught them that a journalist’s role is…to protect the fundamental values of the journalistic method and process.

But the leading military “reporters” and “analysts” in Israel chose not to carry out their duty. Even worse, not only did they fail to defend Blau, they opted to side with the assault on their colleague…

An outsider scrutinizing their conduct in this affair will not be able to avoid feeling shame. Of all people, they are the ones who took on the role of spokesmen for the establishment, as if they were still conscripts. With enthusiasm they reiterated the claim that the material held by Blau has the potential to cause harm…And they are the ones who volunteered the claim that the quantity of documents held by Blau is what makes him qualitatively different from them and their documents, and hence justifies his persecution.

The writer further notes that the IDF didn’t even have to break a sweat in laying out their talking points for the media because their dutiful stenographers, the military correspondents, did it for them:

…The Israel Defense Forces spokesmen and the media advisers of the premier, ministers and senior military commanders have remained virtually silent, and justifiably so. The military “reporters” did the talking in their stead, as if they were trying to show their loyalty to the system as the lowliest of its servants.

And here is the money quote which clearly portrays the difference between the way Blau saw his work as a journalist and the way they see theirs.  And this goes to why they see him as such a threat:

…The way he perceived his work as an investigative reporter, which included writing about the defense establishment, is what is threatening them. Unlike many of these people calling themselves military analysts or correspondents, Blau was never among those who read the official beeper messages the IDF sends out to reporters. The fact is that most of his colleagues get a beeper message, call up one or two officers – the source of the original message – to verify its accuracy, and immediately run off to report the message.

Moreover, part of the routine of that elite group of military correspondents includes coordinated visits to our forces – geared up in flak jackets, eyes bright. From what they describe as “the field,” they parrot what the establishment was all too glad to make known: a planned operation, an advanced weapons system, the way the forces are advancing. That kind of journalism is more like serving as a spokesman than working as a reporter.

Even from his days at Jerusalem weekly Kol Ha’ir…Blau was different. He attacked the defense establishment, didn’t get chummy with its leaders (despite the temptation to have the sort of leaks that no one would dare investigate), tried to pry into its every dark corner and accepted nothing as self-evident. That is how he made major discoveries, but that also appears to be how he became an enemy of the establishment. Not the defense establishment (which would be understandable and reasonable in a democratic system of checks and balances), but the journalistic establishment.

In this sense the Blau affair is indeed a “glaring warning sign”…not because of the work he did but because of the work that others didn’t do, the ones who still dare to call themselves journalists.

Roy Arad has also written convincingly of the utter dysfunction of the Israeli press as a whole in the face of this threat:

Why aren’t Israeli journalists screaming bloody murder that the normal process in democratic countries of leaking a document to the press has been turned in Israel into betrayal of one’s country and grave espionage?  Why is there no unified voice taking Israel’s secret police to task?   Why are Israeli journalists so lacking in a sense of collegiality and solidarity with one of their own?  Has newspaper competition and the bad blood between different papers (especially the deep detestation between Haaretz and Maariv) become more important than freedom of the press overall?  Wouldn’t it be more fitting for the entire Israeli press corps to unite to protect itself in the face of this assault by the secret police on faltering Israeli democracy?  The way in which some journalists have reacted to this case has been a black mark on the profession.

In the current case, Yuval Diskin, the Shin Bet director recently reappointed by Barak to his job, may be doing the bidding of his boss (or as Arad said, “Diskin is Barak’s poodle”) in pursuing Blau with a vengeance.  Arad notes that Diskin’s term was extended for a fifth year just around the time the Kamm case broke.  And in case anyone doubts this as a motive, during the Pentagon Papers case Attorney General John Mitchell offered the FBI director’s job to the judge in the case if he “took care” of Daniel Ellsberg.  The Jerusalem Post reports today that Ashkenazi was especially angered by Blau’s reports on illegal IDF targeted killings and wanted the reporter targeted.

To me, the current Kamm-Blau case is “overdetermined” to use Freudian terms.  The wrath of the authorities simply doesn’t fit the crime.  That’s why many Israelis who’ve confided in me over the past month about this mysterious affair have said there must be a bigger hidden narrative.  I agree with them.  Personally, I think it’s very possible that the hidden hand may be that of Barak or someone doing his bidding.  After all, Ehud Olmert was brought down and now faces trial on numerous similar counts that involved even less money than the $6.5-million shekels that Blau discovered in the Barak story.

H/t Rupa Shah.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]