Muslim and Jewish Women in Nazareth

'We can live in peace'...John Lennon (photo: Dafna Tal)

Mahzor

Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘syria-israel peace talks’

Syria Cancels Latest Round of Israel Peace Talks

Thursday, September 4th, 2008
Nicholas Sarkozy meets Syrian president Bashir Al-Assad

Nicholas Sarkozy meets Syrian president Bashir Al-Assad (Gerard Cereles/AFP-Getty)

Bashir Al-Assad has sent a not so subtle signal to both Ehud Olmert and the Israeli people that their next choice of prime minister can make or break the chance for long-term peace with his country.  Ostensibly and perhaps substantively, Assad ended this stage of the negotiation due to the resignation of Israel’s chief negotiator (and Olmert chief of staff) Yoram Turbowicz.  One thing that Assad is signaling is that he doesn’t want to deal with lame ducks like Bush or Olmert.  He wants an agreement that will stick and who can blame him given Israel’s history of negotiating deals and then abandoning them when they don’t suit its perceived interests.

It raises the importance of Tzipi Livni’s candidacy to rule the Kadima Party as well.  She is the only candidate who seems poised to exploit this opening should she become prime minister.  Thankfully, she is far ahead of her nearest party rival, Shaul Mofaz.  It also gives the Israeli electorate a stark choice when they next vote.  Their likely choice will be between the pragmatic Livni or Bibi Netanyahu, known for his rejectionist stance on such negotiations.  We can expect the usual nationalist pandering from the Likud claiming the Golan is as vital to Israel as Jerusalem and that Livni will “betray” the nation by giving it away.  As with the Bush-Cheney-McCain camp, negotiations are portrayed by the Israeli right as a sign of weakness, when they are a sign of realism and pragmatism.  I only hope that Israelis don’t fall for this trick.  Peace is more important than any single piece of land.

The N.Y. Times’ story also notes that France is stepping into a vacuum normally filled in the past by the U.S.  President Sarkozy has breached the U.S. effort to isolate Syria through his visit and negotiations with President Assad.  Ambitious as Sarkozy is, he clearly seeks to become a player and broker in any future peace negotiations.  All this comes at the expense of the Bush Administration, whose Mideast agenda is currently in shambles, proving that confrontation and isolation do not work when they are the only arrows in the policy quiver.

This should also provide another opening for Barack Obama to attack John McCain by showing the price that the U.S. has had to pay for seven years of isolationist Bush policy in the Middle East.  Should Obama be elected president it is absolutely vital that he rectify the mistakes of his predecessor and engage with Israel, Syria, Lebanon, the Palestinians, and perhaps even Iran should they prove willing, to disengage the combatants and resolve the outstanding issues separating them.  He may be given an opportunity no president has had since Jimmy Carter (who directly helped broker peace with Egypt and and indirectly with Jordan) to resolve many of these conflicting interests and bring peace between Israel and her remaining hostile neighbors.

McCain: Kurtzer Pursuing Secret Syrian Talks

Wednesday, August 20th, 2008
Dan Kurtzer: the nerve on him for encouraging Israel-Syria peace talks!

Dan Kurtzer: the nerve on him for encouraging Israel-Syria peace talks!

In another one of those Gotcha moments in this presidential campaign of never-ending Gotcah moments, John McCain’s bullies er, surrogates, are going after an Obama Middle East advisor because he–get this–attended a conference hosted by the American Bar Association in Syria.  During the visit he–again, get this–encouraged the Syrian foreign minister to advance the Israel-Syria peace negotiations, a policy publicly embraced by Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert.  Omigod, where does Dan Kurtzer get the unmitigated chutzpah to agree with the stated policy of an Israeli government?  Call out the dogs, something must be done, off with his head!

The McCainites even had the audacity to accuse Kurtzer of pursuing his own neogiations with Syria:

Sen. McCain (R-Ariz.) suggest[ed] in a conference call that Kurtzer was engaged in covert negotiations with Syria.

What else irks McCain and other Jewish neocons?  The conference was organized in part by the British Syrian Society, whose founder is Bashir Assad’s father-in-law.  Also, the funding for the conference came in part from Syrian corporations and a Canadian oil company.  This of course means both Kurtzer and Obama are in the pocket of the Syrians:

…The Foundation for the Defense of Democracies’ Tony Badran said the conference Mr. Kurtzer attended in Damascus was part of a Syrian campaign to build up good will with the West…”It’s not a secret that the Syrians are openly banking on Barack Obama. It’s not surprising that they would build bridges in advance and do this through the window of the peace process.”

Getting lost in the hue and cry is the subject of the conference Kurtzer attended, which was strengthening the rule of law in Syrian society.  I guess McCain doesn’t much care for it.

One of McCain’s flunkies got off a medium quality zinger about the trip:

The deputy communications director for the McCain campaign, Michael Goldfarb, quipped yesterday: “If one of Senator Obama’s advisers has been to Damascus, we just wonder how many have been to Tehran.”

Heaven forfend that the McCain campaign should understand that Syria and Iran are quite different countries with much different sets of interests and that Syria, unlike Iran, has actually shown great interest in breaking out of its alliance with Iran and joining the west.  And God forbid that Obama SHOULD send representatives to meet the Iranians.  Imagine what could happen?  Peace might break out and then where would the neocon agenda be??  They lost the Evil Empire in 1989.  They lost Saddam.  Now they have Iran.  It reminds me of the old saying: “If there was no God, humans would have to invent Him.”  What will they do when they don’t have Iran to demonize?

JTA nicely pointed out that each of the McCain flunkies who excoriated Kurtzer–Rudy Giuliani and Randy Scheuneman–aren’t exactly choir boys when it comes to being bought and paid for lobbyists for shabby foreign governments:

They said this did not compare to Giuliani’s law firm’s past representation of Citgo, the Venezuela-owned oil refiner, and of the Saudi oil ministry, nor with Scheunemann’s past lobbying for Georgia. Scheunemann said his lobbying and Giuliani’s lawyering were all part of the public record, although Giuliani’s clients were uncovered by the Associated Press last year after his own presidential campaign declined disclosure requests.

“It is no secret, in fact it’s known openly that I worked for the Georgians,” Scheunemann said. “It was a secret until this story broke that Ambassador Kurtzer before he accompanied Sen. Obama on his Middle East trip was in Syria talking to senior Syrian officials.” It’s not clear that Kurtzer made any effort to hide the visit.

The Obama campaign accused the McCain campaign of hypocrisy. “Senator McCain’s top aide, Charlie Black, was paid to lobby on behalf of dictators guilty of terrible human rights abuses, and the McCain campaign throws a fit about an unpaid advisor encouraging progress in the ongoing Israeli-Syrian peace talks during his free time?” Tommy Vietor, an Obama spokesman, said in an email message. He was referring to Black’s past lobbying for Angolan, Somali, Zairean and other figures.

This is one of those bizarre moments in a presidential campaign.  A candidate’s representative actually does something relatively trivial, but well-meaning to advance the cause of peace.  And the opponent flays him for his trouble.  What does McCain want?  100 years of hatred between the U.S. and Syria (like the 100 years of war in Iraq he’s prepared to accept)?  A perpetual alliance between Iran and Syria against Israel?  Lebanon eternally torn asunder by warring sects?  Is that what his policy would be?

Given that Randy Scheuneman was one of the original neocon proponents of overthrowing Saddam and that Giuliani campaign advisor Norman Podhoretz advocated nuking Iran, my guess is that they and McCain would be quite satisfied with the U.S. on a perpetual war footing against some enemy or another.  Call it: winning and governing by fear.  Bush has perfected the art though he’s been faltering lately and fewer Americans seem to be buying it.  Which is why this McCain Gotcha moment will, with any luck, have the shelf life of a piece of stale bread.

This is the McCain campaign practicing a particularly lame form of wedge politics to pander to pro-Israel Jewish voters.  But perhaps someone should tell McCain that a J Street poll reveals that 58% of American Jews favor a deal between Israel and Syria that involves giving up the Golan in return for full peace with Syria–precisely the purpose of the peace talks Kurtzer was attempting to advance.  I guess McCain believes he’ll score a few points with the 42% who don’t favor such a deal between Israel and Syria.  That’s an awfully small wedge if you ask me.

A slightly different version of this post was published at Comment is Free.