Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘steve-jobs’

Steve Jobs, Hubris, and Destruction of California Architectural Legacy

Thursday, October 6th, 2011

Steve Jobs died yesterday, as all but Martians know. He left an enormous legacy of American innovation and entrepreneurship. He is admired, even worshipped by many. I’ll leave the accolades, no doubt much deserved, for others. I want to talk about the Steve Jobs you won’t be hearing much about.

Juan Cole notes, in an appreciation of Jobs he posted yesterday, that his biological father, who he appears never to have met, was a Syrian Muslim political science graduate student. The latter met Jobs’ biological mother when they both studied in Wisconsin. After the baby’s birth, she put him up for adoption because she wasn’t married to his father (they later did marry).

Jobs’ adoptive mother was of Armenian origin and his father was a blue-collar worker. This is all the stuff of the American Dream. The upwardly striving child of immigrants who seeks to realize his grand ambitions for commerce, discovery or knowledge, using all the tools that America has to offer. And certainly Jobs did that in spades.

But there is a dark side to the American Dream. The one represented by Charles Foster Kane in Citizen Kane. The side of overweening pride, of hubris, perfectionism, intolerance for difference. The rage at the world that slights or disrespects your vision, at anyone who stands in your way.

Like Kane, Jobs left behind a trail of acolytes along with those he betrayed, deserted, quarreled with or left behind.

jackling house destroyed

Jackling House after Jobs's wrecking crew was done with it (Gizmodo)

I want to write tonight about one particular part of the Steve Jobs legacy which curdled my entire impression of him. He’d owned a large, imposing Spanish Revival home in Woodside, CA built in 1926 by an earlier generation of visionary entrepreneur, Daniel Jackling. Jacking House was designed by the Frank Gehry of his day, George Washington Smith, who also designed the most imposing historical public buildings of Santa Barbara.

Jobs bought the house in the 1980s, lived in it for a number of years, and then moved out. Possibly around the time he learned of his cancer diagnosis in 2004, he decided he would build his own Xanadu (the palace Kane had built for himself and wife and where he ultimately dies) on the site. Since he wanted to make a bold statement about himself and his vision, Jackling House would have to go. It represented the past and Jobs wanted to leave his own legacy. For Jobs, it appears the past was only useful when it directly benefitted his own personal needs or vision.

This meant tearing down one of the architectural gems of Northern California, one recognized as such by the National Trust for Historic Places. When local historic preservation activists heard of Jobs’ plans they organized to save Jackling House.

As I wrote earlier, Jobs didn’t get where he was by compromising with the vision of others or by brooking opposition. So the appeals to his sense of history and architectural preservation fell on deaf ears. He was committed to one course and one course alone–realizing his own personal architectural vision and legacy.

jackling house

Jackling House in better days (Woodside History Committee)

The community group founded to save Jackling House recruited wealthy individuals who proposed moving the house to another site so it could be saved and Jobs could get his way. But Jobs always managed to find a way to reject every suitor. Once he realized the preservationists were serious and would not roll over in the face of his legal and PR steamroller the handwriting was on the wall as far as Jackling House’s fate.

For four years, fighting the combined forces of the Town of Woodside and Jobs, the preservationists won every legal battle. But finally, after putting up shoddy arguments, he learned from his previous failures and figured out how to persuade the State judges that he’d exhausted remedies to save the House, when he hadn’t. He finally won and got his way.

On a sad day in 2010, behind a tight security cordon to keep out prying eyes, Jobs’ demolition crew destroyed a moment of California architectural greatness (here is an account from the Woodside local paper). All for the sake of the vision and vanity of a “Great Man.”  As Sarah Amelar writes in Architectural Record:

…What if Jobs had put the funds he poured into destroying the house toward its creative salvation? What if he’d embraced relocation as win-win—freeing his land while preserving a cultural resource? Would a “reasonable contribution” (public or undisclosed) have impinged on a man with $8 billion-plus net worth? Or why not sell the property years ago, and be done with it?

According to Brian Turner, a National Trust regional attorney, “In property disputes, people tend to defend their initial position. They develop tunnel vision, dig in their heels.”

The NY Times reports Jobs’ estate valued around $6.5 billion.  Despite this, during all those years he knew he had a possible fatal cancer, he decided philanthropy was not going to be where he devoted his energy.  I find this startling because almost all the greatest American entrepreneurs devoted considerable time and energy to building their legacy, and they defined an integral part of that through a philanthropic vision.  This didn’t interest him.  When Bill Gates approached him to join an initiative of the super wealthy who took a pledge to give away a majority of their fortune to charity, Jobs refused.  Personally, I think this was a major failure of vision.  I say this perhaps with a touch of self-interest since my professional career was spent as a non-profit fundraiser.  If every wealthy person in America behaved as he did not only would I have been out of a job, there would be none of the amazing philanthropic initiatives which have contributed to our greatness as a free, democratic society concerned with the welfare of even the most humble among us.

But Steve Jobs was not one for humility.

So to those who celebrate Steve Jobs I say, do so, he deserves it. But alongside this celebration of his unmistakable contributions to our culture, hold some space for the dark side of Steve Jobs’ vision. The one who would let nothing and no one stand in his way. The take-no-prisoners Steve Jobs. The angry, vengeful Steve Jobs.  This was a human package containing great good and great badness.

Jobs to Demolish Jackling House Next Week

Wednesday, February 2nd, 2011
jackling house

Jackling House: slated for demolition next week by Steve Jobs

Architecture preservationists have lost a major battle to save an important part of California’s historic legacy.  Steve Jobs, owner of Woodside’s Jackling House, built at the turn of the century by George Washington Smith (who designed many of the distinctive buildings of Santa Barbara and was a champion of the Spanish revival style), has won a long legal battle to demolish the home.  He will begin doing so next week.

Uphold Our Heritage, the preservation group founded to save the distinctive home, and which battled with Jobs for years, lost its last legal battle in 2010.  They had been joined in the campaign by the National Trust for Historic Preservation.  Apparently, Steve Jobs’ Apple leave of absence has given him time to focus the important things in life, like obliterating this piece of California architectural history.

As the Apple founder faces what appears to be terminal cancer, one has to wonder whether this is the legacy he wishes to give the world: that of a stubborn, willful, always victorious man who will stick his finger in the eye of his opponents if given half a chance.  Destroying Jackling House is an act of vandalism that impoverishes the state.  The day of Jackling House’s destruction is a day that will live in infamy and will tarnish this man’s reputation and follow him wherever he goes.

In 1966, developers tore down New York’s gorgeous old Pennsylvania Station and dumped its magnificent statues of ‘Day’ and ‘Night’ in a Jersey Meadowlands dump where activists, who came to be known as historic preservationists, discovered them moldering in the swamp.  Images of these relics spurred the anger that led to the founding of the architectural preservation movement.  I shudder to think where the pieces of Jackling House will end up.  Jobs can’t dump them in San Francisco Bay as there are now environmental laws prohibiting it.  No doubt, the pieces will be ground up to a pulp or powder so as to leave no traces to attest to Jobs’s vandalism.

Uphold Our Heritage: Jobs’ Jackling House Agreement Sweetheart Deal

Tuesday, August 18th, 2009

Recently, Steve Jobs reached an agreement with the town of Woodside supposedly to preserve the California historic landmark Jackling House.  Prior to this, the historic preservation group, Uphold Our Heritage, had battled with Jobs over his plan to demolish the home and replace it with a new home.  The group had prevailed in Superior Court in its attempt to force Jobs to preserve the home under requirements of California law.

There’s only one problem with media reports about the deal: they’re wrong.  Yes, there was a deal–but only between two of the three parties involved.  Uphold Our Heritage was not party to the deal and in fact filed papers with the Court to oppose it last week.  The proposed deal does not guarantee the preservation of Jackling House.  It merely requires that Gordon Smythe, the prospective new owner, dismantle the House, put it in storage and seek an alternate location for it.  If he does not find one within five years the House becomes the property of the Town.  Smythe does not yet have a suitable location for the House nor does he have financing to buy such property.  It’s basically a sweetheart deal that allows Jobs to pay a paltry $600,000 for taking the House down.  Then it’s entirely off his hands and he gets to build the latest Apple McMansion in its stead.

A Court hearing is scheduled for September at which the judge who ruled in favor of preservation the first time will hear UOH’s arguments against the deal.  If she decides not to accept the deal Jobs negotiated, then Jobs will continue his fight to get the California Court of Appeals review the lower court ruling.  This could take years.  In fact, Jobs may be retired or even dead before the case is resolved.  But one thing is for sure, Steve Jobs, one of the most stubborn, obtuse and monomaniacal figures in modern American corporate life, will never back down or compromise in any meaningful way.  This House will be preserved in its current location over his dead body.

I note that a flagship Apple store being built in Melboure, Australia will force the demolition of that city’s finest art deco landmark, Lonsdale House:

One of Melbourne’s finest examples of art deco architecture from the 1930s looks set to be knocked down to make way for an iconic new Apple Store. Lonsdale House, on Lonsdale Street near Caledonian Lane, will be bulldozed…

Robin Grow, president of the Art Deco & Modernism Society, vehemently opposes the development…[and] said Lonsdale House needed to be saved to preserve Melbourne’s cultural heritage.Grow, and other supporters of the “Save Lonsdale House” campaign, said the only reason Lonsdale House was being knocked down as part of the Myer redevelopment was to make the lane wider for trucks.

The entire debacle is eerily similar to another Apple-related heritage battle that has been waging for eight years over company founder Steve Jobs’s plans to knock down a historic 14-bedroom Californian mansion.

Steve Jobs may be a marketing/technology genius.  But like many of the robber barons of old he is a cultural barbarian.

Jobs’ Jackling House Saved? Not Really

Friday, July 17th, 2009
Jackling House in happier days (1960)

Jackling House in happier days (1960)

An article in a Silicon Valley newspaper misleadingly heralds an agreement between Steve Jobs and the town of Woodside that supposedly guarantees the preservation of Jackling House, a historic California home he owns in that town. It was originally built for copper baron Daniel Jackling, who, like Jobs, made a fortune in a new technology of his day, providing the copper for electric wiring. Jackling commissioned George Washington Smith, who later created the Spanish Revival look of Santa Barbara, to build his dream palace.

For several years, Gordon Smythe, a technology entrepreneur, has offered to preserve Jackling House and Jobs has refused because he preferred tearing it down in order to build Mr. Blandings dream house on the six acre property.

After a historic preservation group, Uphold Our Heritage, organized to block Jobs’ plans and won a victory in State Superior Court, Jobs attempted to appeal to the State Supreme Court. But he also allowed his lawyer to reopen talks with Smythe. It appears that they’ve come to an agreement and that was what the town council approved.

Jobs malign neglect of Jackling House

What does this agreement actually do? Does it preserve Jackling House? Not really. Uphold Our Heritage has engaged experts who’ve told them relocation of the House would cost approximately $4-million excluding the purchase of a new piece of property. Jobs has always refused to pony up this money. And in this agreement he offers $600,000 for Smythe to take it off his hands. The problem is that Smythe does not yet have a property to which to move the House, nor does he have the funds for the actual relocation.

In the interim, he plans to store the House in pieces. When and if he does restore it in a new location, he’s specified that he will only rebuild the original portion of the House built in 1925, but will not restore a 1931 addition.

So we really have a half-assed resolution of the issue. This is why Uphold Our Heritage will go before Judge Weiner in August to present its position on the agreement. The group hasn’t yet determined what that position will be, but if it does oppose the deal and the judge finds in UOH’s favor, then it’ll be back to the drawing board. And it will mean the continuation of Jobs’ painful neglect of the home which has turned it into a boarded-up relic.

Typically, Jobs’ attorney has placed blame on the preservation group if it derails any agreement with Smythe, claiming that it stands in the way of restoration of the House.  When it comes to people like Steve Jobs, it’s always the other guy’s fault.  Never his own.  Given his billions, shelling out $4 million to save this House is a pittance.  But he just won’t do it on principle.

Given Jobs’ history of high-handed, opaque behavior as a corporate CEO in which he attempted to conceal backdated stock options and refused to tell his shareholders that he’d undergone a liver transplant (until he had no choice), it’s not surprising that he’s willing to see a beautiful example of California historic architecture go to ruin in a fit of personal pique.

Woodside Colludes With Jobs to Destroy Jackling House

Tuesday, May 19th, 2009
Jackling House

Jackling House

Recently, the town of Woodside, CA. voted 6-1 to allow Steve Jobs to tear down the historic Jackling House.  Previously, the State Superior Court and Court of Appeals had overturned an earlier Town ruling permitting the demolition on the grounds that this violated state law which called for preservation of culturally significant buildings.  Despite these losses and no change in the evidence or arguments presented, Jobs returned to the Town and asked for them to reapprove his plan.  They obediently did so.

The arguments presented by Town board members showed just how little they understood the law, which clearly states that the California Environmental Quality Act not only intrinsically values the House, but prohibits its destruction.  It is sad to note that the Town’s elected officials not only don’t do their homework, they really could care less:

“I didn’t see any reason to try to restore or maintain this house,” he [council member Dave Tanner] said of the Jackling House.

Tanner cited the structure’s enormous size, associated heating and energy costs, as well as the town’s stated preference for smaller homes on large lots as reasons restoration don’t make sense.

Clearly, the state courts will once again stop Jobs and the Town in their tracks.  But this doesn’t bother Jobs who is used to getting his way in life since he is a virtual Master of the Universe.

A representative of the National Trust for Historic Places called Jackling House “”one of California’s masterpieces.” The Trust’s blog featured this post on the story. It was designed by George Washington Smith, who was responsible for Santa Barbara’s Spanish revival masterpieces including the Biltmore Hotel and art museum.

Montana State University history professor Timothy LeCain noted in a letter to the Town, the irony in their decision to destroy the historic home of the great American copper baron, Daniel Jackling:

Daniel Jackling “wired” America. The copper from his mine…has been strung over thousands of miles of power lines, threaded into the walls of millions of homes, and built into countless electric devices from toasters and autos to cell phones and computers. There, of course, lies the sharp irony of our dangerously forgetful age. That Steven Jobs–a man whose entire career has been built on devices that are essentially useless absent our copper-based electric power grid–proposes to tear-down the home of the very man whose own innovations made that electric grid possible, strikes me as a particularly egregious case of historical ingratitude and amnesia.

In an analogy that is especially pertinent to my home here in Seattle, LeCain notes that this would be like William Boeing buying and destroying Wilbur and Orville Wright’s birthplace. Would we accept such architectural vandalism?

Another dark irony is that one of the arguments Jobs and his supporters use to justify tearing down the house is that it is a dilapidated wreck.  A commenter here proudly linked to images taken by a photograher who broke into the house as if to say: “You see what kind of mess you want to preserve?”  They neglect to mention that the current owner, Steve Jobs, is responsible for the boarded up hulk Jackling House has become.  There is no provision in state law saying an owner should be shown special consideration for neglecting his property.

Interestingly, the Town has hired as its special counsel in this matter, Anna Shimko of Cassidy, Shimko, Dawson & Kawakami, has another important client (pdf).  Are you ready?  Pixar.  That’s right.  Steve Jobs’ company is represented by a lawyer also working for the Town.  Do I hear conflict of interest anyone?  If I were a resident of Woodside I’d be yelling my head off: how are the Town’s interests represented fairly and objectively when the attorney representing them has Steve Jobs interests at heart?  And I can tell you that Pixar represents a far more important client to her law firm than Woodside does.  So who’s interests will she have at heart?  Or are the interests of the Town and Steve Jobs indistinguishable?

California Supreme Court Refuses Jobs Appeal, Jackling House Saved!

Friday, April 27th, 2007
Jackling HouseDaniel Jackling House, ‘tear-down’ no more (Woodside History Committee)

When last we saw our hero, Steve Jobs he had lost a Superior Court case attempting to demolish historic Jackling House in Woodside, California created by famed architect George Washington Smith (designer of many Santa Barbara Spanish Revival buildings). Steve, never one to accept anything that stands in the way of realizing his ambitions, asked the Supreme Court to hear his appeal. This week it refused. This means that Jobs has exhausted his legal remedies and must find someone to take the House and relocate it if he [Jobs] still wishes to build his dream house on the property.

Uphold Our Heritage, the preservation group established to save the house has always advocated for a resolution that would allow Jobs to build his new home while preserving Jackling House. Unfortunately, he has persevered in demanding his right to destroy it. The preservation group has found several preservation-minded individuals interested in negotiating with Jobs about relocating the home. Let’s hope that Jobs will see reason and begin negotiations in earnest with one of these potential buyers and the UOH attorney, Doug Carstens.

It never needed to come to this. Hundreds of thousands of dollars of legal fees, thousands of hours of staff time by the city of Woodside and various judicial venues that heard the case. I guess when you’re Steve Jobs the world marches to your rhythm rather than the other way around.

I get a lot of people coming to these posts who tell me in their infinite wisdom as ‘architectural historians’ that Jackling House looks like a load of rubbish. To them I’ll add a few quotes from the Uphold Our Heritage site:

The Jackling House [is in] the California Register of Historic Places for its association with an historic figure, copper baron Daniel Jackling, and for its exemplary design and materials, the work of master architect George Washington Smith, known as the “Founding Father” of Spanish Revival architecture in this country.

…George Washington Smith is one of only NINE great California estate designers acknowledged in “The Garden Book” (Phaidon, 2002). Smith gets a full page in the book, along with the world’s most important designers of palaces, châteaux, country houses, including Thomas Jefferson, Frank Lloyd Wright, and the designers of the Alhambra, the Imperial Palace and Gardens in Tokyo, and Versailles!

In her book on “The Santa Barbara Style” (Rizzoli, New York, 2001) author Kathryn Masson lauds:

Smith’s masterful interpretation of the architectural vocabulary of vernacular buildings in Andalusian Spain. His use of authentic materials and command of architectural forms convey a romantic Mediterranean atmosphere. Traditional Spanish design is authenticated by thick stuccoed walls that allow for deep window and door openings, heavy overhangs with carved wooden corbels that throw structured shadows back onto the gleaming wall surfaces, and design elements such as hidden gardens, colonnaded porches, and multi-leveled building units with varying rooflines.

On a related subject, I noted that the NY Times business columnist Joe Nocera (TimesSelect required) wrote today about Steve Jobs and the current Apple options backdating scandal. Some of his observations of Jobs’ personality and behavior are amazingly pertinent to his actions in the Jackling House case:

Now let’s look at the other [second] grant–the 7.5 million options to Mr. Jobs himself…

Consider, first, Mr. Jobs’s desire to replace the 20 million options [which were "under water"] with the 7.5 million options. What he was really trying to do was reprice his options without actually admitting that — because repricing would entail an accounting expense. To avoid the expense, he was supposed to wait six months and a day after the cancellation of the first package before Apple gave him the new package.

But he was Steve Jobs, and he wasn’t about to go optionless for six months and a day…

You get the strong impression that nobody dared to say no to Mr. Jobs, a notoriously difficult and abrasive chief executive. One imagines the trepidation of the compensation committee members — or Ms. Heinen [corporate counsel] — in telling him that he couldn’t get a low option price because the stock had risen during the negotiations.

So instead, they found a date in October that approximated the stock price in August — and an underling created phony board minutes.

What is particularly galling is the double standard. You hear from lots of sophisticated investors that it would be terrible if Mr. Jobs were forced out at Apple. How, they say, would that help Apple shareholders?

But lots of other chiefs have lost their jobs because of options backdating, and several have even been indicted. However indispensable he may be, the notion that Mr. Jobs can’t be touched because he’s Steve Jobs is something terribly corrosive.

If the S.E.C. is coming to the view that options backdating is just a peccadillo, as Silicon Valley has claimed all along, it should say so. But if it believes this is serious stuff, then it shouldn’t be making excuses for Steve Jobs, as it appears to be doing.

As for Mr. Jobs, as hard as he’s worked to convey the image of an above-the-fray visionary, that’s not quite the reality, is it? I recently stumbled across this comment from him, circa 1985: “I’m at a stage where I don’t have to do things just to get by. But then I’ve always been that way, because I’ve never really cared about money.”

Yeah, right.

What Nocera notes, and the Jackling House episode confirms, is that Steve Jobs could have close to what he wants, but not quite the whole echilada, if he would just compromise a wee bit with reality in the form of corporate securities law (the stock options) or the California code (preserving Jackling House). But he won’t do it–on self-serving principle. And that’s where he gets himself into trouble. In the case of Jackling House, it isn’t a matter that will bring his empire down like a house of cards. In the case of the options scandal, it probably should but it won’t. Again, Steve Jobs lives a charmed life–one that isn’t earned. And that, as Nocera correctly note, is “something terribly corrosive” of societal values.

Jobs’ behavior concerning both Jackling House and the options scandal betrays his egomania and vanity. What he really wants to do regarding the house is tear it down so he can outdo his other Silicon Valley tycoon rivals who’ve built sumptuous palaces as monuments to their own egos. The irony here is that it’s possible that might’ve been Daniel Jackling’s own motive in originally building the house, since he himself was a copper baron trying to make his mark in the 1920s with an architectural statement. But regardless of whether there was vanity or ego involved in the original creation of this landmark, it has withstood the test of time in its 90 years of existence and is worthy of preservation.

Jobs Files for State Supreme Court Review in Jackling House Case

Saturday, February 24th, 2007
Jackling HouseJackling House circa 1970 (credit: Christopher Lloyd)

Steve Jobs, who wishes to demolish the historic Jackling House in Woodside, CA, has filed papers asking the California State Supreme Court to accept an appeal of a lower court ruling which forbade him from doing so. In my last report on this case, I expressed the hope that Jobs would finally–after losing decisively in two lower court rulings–accept the will of the judiciary and agree to preserve Jackling House. There are several potential owners who’ve stepped forward and are willing to accept the house if it’s moved to another site, which would allow Jobs to build the new home he wants on


the current property. But Jobs persists in his wish to tear down the home which was built by famed California architect, George Washington Smith (who was responsible for the Spanish colonial revival style popular in southern California).

It is the mark of a very stubborn, very rich, and very petulant person–one used to getting his way in everything–to carry on with this case. The papers he has filed basically restate Jobs’ previous arguments which were solidly rejected by both the Superior Court and Court of Appeals (in a unanimous decision). As in the past, Uphold Our Heritage and its attorney, Doug Carstens, will oppose Jobs.

The intrepid Patty Fisher of the San Jose Mercury News wrote a nice human interest story about the House recently:

At the age of 89, Gladys Woodhams’ passion for preservation is still contagious.

Last week she called to tell me how delighted she was that a state appeals court had again foiled Apple CEO Steve Jobs’ plans to tear down his historic house in Woodside.

“I think it’s wonderful,” she said. “Just wonderful.”

After failing to get permission from the court to demolish the 17,000-square-foot mansion he bought in 1984, Jobs will have to find someone to dismantle the house and rebuild it somewhere else. Several people have expressed interest, and Woodhams would like him to hurry up and make a deal…

“If you have something worth moving and you have the money to do it, well, it’s worth the effort,” she said…

The problem with Silicon Valley, she says, is that people have too much money and too little respect for the past.

“Most of the money is in the hands of people who have bad taste,” she said. “And they don’t even know what they are spending it on.”

I can’t speak for the quality of Jobs’ taste, but he clearly has little or no respect for the past–at least the architectural past.

Jackling House Historic Photos and Steve Jobs Taken Down a Peg or Two

Monday, January 22nd, 2007

For the latest update on Steve Jobs’ failure to gain a review by the California Supreme Court in his effort to destroy Jackling House, see this post.

Just after Steve Jobs lost his bid to demolish Jackling House, Christopher Lloyd visited the blog and wrote me a fascinating story about his personal bond to the House. In the early 1970s, a close relative owned the property and invited Christoper and his family to visit. They did and he had an enchanting stay. His father took these images and I reprint them here with Christopher’s kind permission. Should anyone visiting, wish to use these images you must contact him for permission. Clotilde Luce of Uphold Our Heritage, a former resident of the House herself, says these images fill a gap in the historical documentation of the House. So I reprint them here with pleasure.


Most of the previous photos I’ve seen have been in black and white and have not shown many exterior details of the house and its landscaping. What I like about Christoper’s images is that they show wonderful exterior details; and they also show how the House ‘lived’ in its surroundings. For those who know the northern California landscape, these pictures will remind you of the wonderfully lush understory of stately California oaks. The House here looks nothing like a manicured museum like Filoli, another historic home in the area. Jackling House here is lovingly maintained, but it is most of all lived in. It looks like it is being used, but used well. It would make George Washington Smith, its architect proud.


Jackling House front perspective Jackling House driveway
Jackling House door Jackling House outside door
Jackling House outside Jackling House courtyard

Now for something completely different. I love the dripping sarcasm of this column in the San Jose Mercury News by Patty Fisher:

Howard Ellman, Steve Jobs’ attorney, sounded pretty annoyed when I called him last week to ask about the Jackling House.

I wanted to know how Jobs had reacted when a state appeals court ruled Thursday that he couldn’t tear down his 30-bedroom historic mansion in Woodside.

Didn’t I understand how busy Mr. Jobs was? Ellman asked me. Didn’t I read my own newspaper?

Indeed, I understand. What with Macworld, Cisco Systems’ trademark lawsuit over the iPhone and those sticky questions about backdated options, Apple’s iconic chief executive had more pressing things on his mind than some drafty old house.

Not that the house has ever been a pressing issue for Jobs. Since 2000, he has neglected it, hoping it would fall down so he could build a smaller and spiffier house in its place.

Jobs is good at making things smaller and spiffier.

She notes that Gordon Smythe, a local venture capitalist, is very interested in taking on the house and moving it to a suitable local site. But Jobs, alas, hasn’t taken his interest seriously even though it would seem, after his two court losses, to be the only way Mr. Jobs’ Dream House will get built on the Jackling site:

Smythe wants to seal the deal, but Jobs is a tough guy to get a meeting with these days. Considering they live in the same neighborhood, I suggest Smythe stroll by with his baby and knock on Jobs’ door.

Kids grow up so quickly. If Jobs wants to build his own dream house before his kids leave home, he might want to move this project to the top of his to-do list.

After all, one thing we know about a cool gadget like the iPhone (or the Appletalker or CisNO or whatever the lawyers decide to call it) is that it becomes obsolete in a nanosecond. Someone — probably Jobs — will always design something even smaller and spiffier.

A house, on the other hand, can last for generations.

Or not, if Steve Jobs could have his way. Thank God, two California courts have told him he can’t.

UPDATE: Several commenters below have incorrectly claimed that when Jobs bought the House the law under which he is currently forbidden from demolishing it was not in effect. In their view, Jobs bought the building assuming he could do with it as he wished and then the State changed the rules on him thereby punishing him unfairly. This is not the case. Jobs bought the property in 1984 and the California Environmental Quality Act was passed in the 1970s.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE