Muslim and Jewish Women in Nazareth

'We can live in peace'...John Lennon (photo: Dafna Tal)

Mahzor

Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘standwithus’

Misunderstanding the Iranian Threat

Friday, October 16th, 2009

The following appeared in today’s JTNews, the newspaper of the Seattle Jewish community.  It was accompanied by an excellent news report by Leyna Crow on the controversy surrounding the Seattle federation co-sponsored conference on the alleged Iranian nuclear threat.  To support the progressive Iran-Israel conference on December 16th, please make a donation here to cover our expenses:

The Jewish federation is hosting a community conference, Understanding the Iranian Threat, on October 21st.  The federation website notes it:

…Will provide a look at Iran’s history and political landscape; an in-depth analysis of the dangers of a nuclear-armed Iran; its strategic threat to Israel, the United States and the world; and, an understanding of how we can prevent it.

While the panel speakers (from Aipac, the Jerusalem Post and Israeli government) are qualified to represent the views of the Israeli government, Aipac and StandWithUs, the sponsors, they are not qualified to discuss “Iran’s history and political landscape” since they likely have never visited Iran, do not speak Farsi, and have no academic expertise in this field.

This event will present a partisan hawkish view of the Iranian crisis.  Expenses for this event will be paid by Aipac and SWU, hardline pro-Israel advocacy groups.  Speakers will advocate “crippling sanctions” (Bibi Netanyahu’s term) and failing them, a possible military attack on Iran.  Katz, in a report in the Post said that such an Israeli military attack on Iran could cause the current hardline government to fall.  In fact, almost every serious Iran analyst believes that a military attack on Iran will unite the nation behind the hardline clerics and doom the reformist movement.  The leader of the opposition, Mir-Hussein Moussavi, has publicly warned that further sanctions will hurt his movement.

We as Jews should think about the long-term impact of U.S. and Israeli actions.  If we really wish a more democratic Iran open to foregoing nuclear weapons, then a pragmatic approach is the only way to go.  As tempting as confronting Iran’s Ahmadinejads is, we should think about the impact of threats and harsh rhetoric on political reality.  Iran’s current hardline leadership is an unsavory lot.  But a policy of confrontation will not attain the goals that we set for eliminating Iran’s nuclear threat.

The federation conference claims to represent the consensus views of the local Jewish community.  But the 2009 American Jewish Committee national survey finds  that about one-third of Jews oppose an attack on Iran.  This minority realist strain in Jewish opinion will NOT (as of the day I write this) be represented by any panelist at the event.

While JTNews originally refused to publish this statement claiming it is unnecessary because the event will not be partisan.  I disagreed and planned to pay for an ad to make views known that should have been readily published.  But I’m pleased to say that the newspaper’s editor finally agreed to publish this as an op ed and recognized the need to present a wider perspective within the pages of the paper.

The Israeli foreign ministry, Aipac and StandWithUs should not control this debate within the Jewish community.  For that reason, a coalition of local community groups including some in the Jewish community will host a conference which will present the alternative views that should have been offered on October 21st.

On December 16th at Town Hall, Keith Weissman, former director of Aipac’s Iran desk, Prof. Ian Lustick of the University of Pennsylvania’s department of politica science, and Trita Parsi, director of the National Iranian American Council will present a pragmatic approach to the Iranian crisis which embraces diplomatic engagement and eschews force.  Unlike the federation event, each of these speakers has academic and direct personal experience of Iran along with deep experience of Israel and its interests.  I invite Seattle’s Jewish community to hear a point of view endorsed by one-third of our fellow Jews.

David Brumer and His Acolytes Rant

Thursday, August 13th, 2009
Brumer (or his acolytes) speak

Brumer (or his acolytes) speak

David Brumer is an executive committee member of StandWithUs/Northwest and the Seattle chapter of the American Jewish Committee.  He is one of Seattle’s leading enforcers for the pro-Israel right, making sure that anyone dissenting from the party line gets a good whack in the shins.  While I was always under the impression that social workers were practitioners of the healing arts, he also serves in that capacity at the Jewish federation funded Kline Galland Home which, aside from his employment there, actually has a good repuation for geriatric care.

Brumer has made it his business to smear me with epithets like “deranged,” and suggested I may be “fascinated” with gay porn, and that I should be spanked for my supposed hostility to Israel.  But now Brumer’s acolytes have gotten into the act.  Someone posting here as Brum Speaks has published scores of smutty comments here which I think the world should see.  Given the IP address, this probably isn’t Brumer himself (he may be a bully but he isn’t that stupid).  But this genius clearly is a devout follower of Brumer and his blog since he gives the impression that he speaks in Brumer’s name and offers a link to that font of Jewish blogging wisdom.

Unfortunately, no one in either the federation or Kline Galland Home leadership seems concerned enough about this to rein Brumer in. Which says a great deal about the quality of local leadership and its willingness to turn a blind eye to such bizarre behavior.

Seattle Jewish Community 2004 Derech Eretz Statement

Friday, July 31st, 2009
Derech Eretz Israel 2004 statement

Derech Eretz Israel 2004 statement

In the midst of the controversy over the Seattle Jewish federation letter sent to Kadima denouncing its hosting of Palestinian anti-Occupation cleric Canon Naim Ateek, Rainer Waldman Adkins referred in a JTNews interview to a “community protocol” that required those who created this letter to follow a path other than the one they chose.

When challenged by Rob Jacobs, StandWithUs’ Seattle director, who claimed my characterization of this document as an Israel Accord was a fiction and that the document didn’t exist–I decided to dig the document up. And guess what, the document that never existed was signed by none other than Rob Jacobs! Must be a case of severe memory loss. Or perhaps Rob only remembers those things it’s convenient for him to remember?

At any rate, here is the text of the Derech Eretz Israel Statement 2004 (pdf). You may click on the image to open the full sized version:

We represent a broad spectrum of opinion within the Jewish community. We frequently disagree on issues relating to Israel, including the best path towards security and well-being for Israel and the Jewish people.

Especially in trying times, such as during the upcoming Gaza disengagement, we expect vigorous debate and disagreement in Israel and between Jews everywhere, including here in Washington State.

While we have differences of opinion, we hope with this statement to make it very clear that Israel is always close to all our hearts and souls. Further, we are united in our commitment to respectful, constructive and civil dialogue concerning Israel. Such behavior strengthens our collective support for Israel and our community.

Therefore,
•We commit to practice Derech Eretz, exhibiting and nurturing respect and communication, trusting in each other’s good intentions, and rejecting personal or malicious attacks, as we debate issues pertaining to Israel, the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, peace in the Mideast, and the wider Jewish community.

Further, in spite of our differences, together we publicly state that we agree on several core principles:

• Israel has the right to exist, in peace, as the Jewish State.
•We support Israel’s efforts to maintain itself as a democratic and pluralistic society, despite the pressures faced both within and without.
• Israel has the right, as a sovereign nation, to secure and recognized borders, to defend itself, and to protect its citizens.
•We support Israel’s efforts to find a peaceful solution to the conflict in the Mideast.
•We fervently hope and pray for peace within Israel, among Jews everywhere, between Israelis and Palestinians, and between Israelis and all peoples of the region.

We therefore pledge ourselves to do all in our power to assist Israel in every way at this difficult time.

This is the pertinent phrase which Rainer referred to in expressing his disappointment with the federation’s attack on Kadima:

We commit to…exhibiting and nurturing respect and communication, trusting in each other’s good intentions, and rejecting personal or malicious attacks

A reasonable person would read that and imagine that the federation’s Israel committee, finding fault with Kadima’s hosting of Ateek would communicate that to the group in a timely and respectful way that would allow an exchange of views on the subject. The statement makes no mention of grandstanding or scoring propaganda points, which is clearly what Rob Jacobs and those who spearheaded the letter but who did not sign it, sought to do.

In fact, if I didn’t know better I might think that the letter might be an opening salvo in a campaign to delegitimize groups like Brit Tzedek and Kadima and prohibit them from participating in the deliberations of the Israel committee.

In Rob’s twisted interpretation of this document it was Kadima’s obligation to come to the Israel committee before it agreed to host the event. It’s incumbent on the Jewish progressive community to get a heksher to host events that might be controversial for Rob and other local Israel lobby groups.

Would you care to admit your error, Rob?