Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘shimon-peres’

Haaretz Calls on Peres to Torpedo Iran Attack

Sunday, October 30th, 2011

This may be the equivalent of a Hail Mary pass in the final moments of a deadlocked football game, but Haaretz’s columnist Amir Oren, always an interesting observer of the Israeli political scene, writes today (and in Hebrew) that the only political figure who may be able to stop an Israeli attack on Iran is Shimon Peres.  I don’t know if he’s right.  Though Peres is not a conventional Israeli president who fades into the woodwork, he is still president, a largely honorific and ceremonial post.  It’s debatable whether Peres has the power to do what Oren is asking.  Though it’s not beyond the realm of possibility that he does.

peres,ben gurion,dayan

Shimon Peres and David Ben Gurion (Moshe Dayan in background)

Oren’s column marks the 55th anniversary of the opening of the 1956 Sinai War.  This was a military enterprise in which Shimon Peres, along with Moshe Dayan and David Ben Gurion (Peres’ political patron) played decisive roles.  From Israel’s point of view there were numerous successes and failures.  But among the latter was this:

Israel stained itself morally by hatching a conspiracy with two fading European powers against North African national liberation movements…

This reminds us, that while Iran is certainly no representative of the Arab spring, an Israeli attack upon it will certainly arouse the combined ire of the entire Arab world and place Israel even more firmly among those resisting the forces of history which have swept the region and toppled authoritarian regimes.

The Haaretz columnist also points out that Israel went to war with Britain and France as partners, but without the foreknowledge or support of the U.S.  This was a fateful mistake as Pres. Eisenhower became enraged at the military adventure and demanded that conditions be returned to status quo ante, which is more or less what happened.  Today, Israel can no longer play this sort of game.  It has no military partners as it did in 1956 and the U.S. is its only remaining ally.  Without U.S. support or at least connivance, Israel will be hard-pressed to act.

The benefit to Bibi in this case is that Obama is no Ike. He has neither the stature nor the military command experience to face down Bibi if the latter decides to go for broke.  So the question is whether Leon Panetta gave Israel a green, yellow or red light (as Bush gave Olmert) regarding Iran when he discussed an attack on his last visit.  It may perhaps be in realization of this fact that Oren turns to the grey eminence, Peres, to stop the future war (Haaretz’s English translation is defective in the last paragraph, so I’ve partially used it and fixed the errors below):

An Israeli operation against Iran’s nuclear program is liable to recycle the cons of Operation Kadesh, without its benefits. Such a fear is harbored by those who oppose this possible military adventure; the list of negative effects outweighs whatever diplomatic or military advantages might be accrued by such an action, the critics believe. After all, Barak is no Moshe Dayan, and Bibi is no Ben-Gurion.

Only Peres, who is no mere symbolic President (as Yitzhak Ben Zvi was during the 1956 War), remains in power, this time exerting an influence against the military undertaking [as opposed to 1956, when he orchestrated it].  In today’s Theater of Fateful Decisions [as opposed to 1956], there is no playwright [Ben Gurion], director [Dayan], producer [Peres] or  actor [IDF].  He [Peres] is just like the esteemed critic, from whose mouth the creative team [Bibi and Barak] awaits word before presenting the play to the public.

His devastating criticism of the dress rehearsal might postpone the premiere or cancel the performance altogether.  Critic, don’t keep mum. Soon will come time for him to raise his voice.

Amir Oren is a reporter who enjoys speaking in elaborate allegorical terms especially involving secret intelligence or military operations and so the fact that he uses the theatrical metaphor here is natural.  But an Israeli friend notes that the “dress rehearsal” above could very likely refer to actual military maneuvers meant to simulate and prepare for an Iran attack.  Israel is known to have done such a preparatory operation a few years ago around the time that Meir Dagan says he talked the ministers out of initiating such an attack.  So the likelihood of such a military rehearsal now is very real.  The timing would still allow Israel to send its F-16s to bomb Iran before the heavy rains and cloud cover of the Persian Gulf winter sets in, making such an operation less feasible.

Peres, Shin Bet Chief Colluded to Cover-Up Murder of Palestinian Militants in Terror Attack

Monday, September 26th, 2011
bus 300 attacker being led to death

Shin Bet officers lead Bus 300 attacker to his death (Alex Levac)

In the annals of Israeli terror attacks its one of the most memorable in a long line of such horrible incidents.  Horrible not just because of the shock of the incident (then bus hijackings were unheard of).  But for the trail of lies, collusion and cowardice perpetrated by senior Israeli officials to cover-up the murder in cold-blood of the attackers after they’d been captured.

It is known as the Bus (or Kav) 300 incident for the name of the bus line on which the hijacked vehicle ran.  In April 1984, four Palestinians from Gaza took over the bus just after it left Tel Aviv.  Eventually, Israeli forces stopped it and commandos attacked killing two of the militants.  The remaining two were removed from the bus in handcuffs.  Pictures of them were later disseminated around the world.  Then Shin Bet chief Avraham Shalom commanded that they be killed on the spot.  They were dispatched with blows to the skull from large rocks.  No one at the time was aware that a photographer had recorded the terrorists alive and in handcuffs.  When the Shin Bet reported that all the terrorists had been killed during the operation to free the bus, David Shipler told NY Times readers that the Israeli magazine, Hadashot had a photograph of one of the hijackers, Majdi Abu Jummaa being led alive off the bus.

In Israel, Uri Avnery’s HaOlam HaZeh, published a photo that blurred the face of the hijacker.  Then all hell broke loose.

The Shin Bet chief tried to blame the IDF officer in charge of the operation.  The State tried him and eleven others for the murders, but they were not convicted.  Later, it turned out that Shalom had orchestrated the entire trial in order to protect himself and his staff.

Later, three Shin Bet deputies turned on their boss.  They appealed to minister Shimon Peres, but he backed Shalom.  The deputies were then forced out of the agency.  One and a half years after the incident, they all turned to the State attorney general, Yitzhak Zamir, who opened an investigation against Shalom.  But before he could prosecute, he too was forced from office after he refused to end it and was charged with jeopardizing national security.  No one was punished.  In fact, Israel’s then president, Chaim Herzog issued blanket pardons to a number of figures even before being charged.  Shalom charged that all his actions had been authorized, which implied that even prime minister Yitzhak Shamir was implicated.  It was a deemed a fuck-up too big to fail.  The State, as a result, circled the wagons to protect its own and turned on the lesser figures who were trying to stand up for right and decency.  The whistleblowers, as usual, got the short end and the evildoers got off scot-free.

When he retired from the Shin Bet in 1996, Ehud Yatom admitted in an interview that he was the killer and proud of that fact.  He added this memorable and truly twisted claim:

“Only clean, moral hands in Shin Bet can do what is needed in a democratic state.”

The Bus 300 incident harkens back to an earlier time in the history of Israel.  A time when Israelis still trusted implicitly anything their leaders, especially their military and intelligence leaders told them.  They still do, by the way.  But no longer does every Israeli do so without question.  Then there was trust and innocence, a belief in authority and in the justness of the Israeli cause.  In hindsight, many look back on this incident and see it as a turning point and everything that followed from it proved the hypocrisy and mendaciousness of which the authorities were capable in order to protect their interests, especially when they involved Palestinians, whose lives were deemed cheap enough to sacrifice.

The incident also put into sharp relief the role of the media in exposing the sordid underbelly of the cover-up.  Journalists like Shipler (who later won a Pulitzer Prize) and Avnery were the heroes.  Unfortunately, today there are fewer heroes and more evildoers, or at least those in the media who acquiesce to them.

Bibi Rewrites History–and Reality

Thursday, February 24th, 2011

Bibi Netanyahu, in a Knesset speech covered by Haaretz, announced some sweeping revisions to history and Israeli-Arab reality.  For example, did you know that a Palestinian state already exists?  Sure does, according to the Beeb, who said with regard to the Arab uprisings toppling dictators right and left:

We do not know what will happen to our west, and we do not know what will happen to our east, and who can determine whether the Palestinian state – in the middle of it all – will hold on?”

This reminds me a bit of Ronald Reagan who would tell convincing stories of his war experiences in the Pacific theater during World War II, which consisted of his memories of war films in which he’d acted.  It’s so much more convenient for an Israeli prime minister to prevent the creation of a Palestinian state, and then turn around and tell his western critics that one already exists despite the fact that it may be in his mind only.

Oh, and don’t ya know that Turkey destroyed its relations with Israel solely by the attack of Prime Minister Erdogan on Shimon Peres at Davos?

Just as the de-facto peace relations that we had with one country – Iran – evaporated in a moment, just as the more official, more established relationship that even included joint military exercises and 400,000 tourists evaporated overnight when the Turkish prime minister attacked our President Peres in Davos…

There are a few small matters like the Mavi Marmara massacre and Ehud Olmert’s destruction of the Syrian-Israeli peace negotiation mediated by Erdogan, when he began Operation Cast Lead.  Those little incidents, of course, played no role in the torpedoing of Israel-Turkey relations.

Not to mention it was Shimon Peres who sputtered with rage at Davos, violating international protocol by viciously attacking Turkey and its elected national leader in a public gathering; and that this provoked Erdogan to walk out of the meeting.  And that Peres apologized afterward for his intemperance.

But hey, what’s a dose of reality among friends?  And who needs reality anyway when you can have such a delightful delusional alternate universe all for the asking?  When you’re a Likud prime minister, anything’s possible.  Next thing you know, pigs will fly and maybe even be kosher.

As I wrote in a recent post about the bloody mess unfolding in Tripoli, such mayhem is good for the Occupation business.  Proof lies no farther than Bibi’s speech to the Knesset, where he finds succor in the bloodbath, because it gives him an out as far as negotiating a peace with the Palestinians:

Netanyahu also claimed that “The entire world told us the reason for instability in the Middle East is the Israel-Palestinian conflict. We begged to differ. There is a problem here that we wish to solve, but we must take the Islamic extremists – who are spreading everywhere – into account.”

Bibi, as usual, gets his facts wrong.  The entire world hasn’t said the reason for Middle East instability lies in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.  It has said that the reason for the popularity of Islamist extremism like Al Qaeda lies in the lack of resolution of the conflict.  Perhaps as a corollary, many of the toppled and toppling autocrats have looked favorably on Israel.  This may have played some role in their lack of popularity.  But these leaders have done far more damage to their reputations by harming their own citizens directly.

Of course, what really worries Bibi, and what he can’t say to his fellow Knesset delusionals, is that the rising democratization of the Arab world means that new governments will be listening to the will of the people and pursuing new foreign policy goals accordingly.  Thus, the free ride Israel enjoyed from regimes like Egypt, Turkey (pre-Erdogan)  and Jordan may be a thing of the past.  Israel henceforward may have to create support in the Arab world the old- fashioned way–by earning it.

Big Boys Shouldn’t Play With Guns

Saturday, February 19th, 2011
shimon peres with idf special forces

Shimmi: 'don't point that thing at me'

I’ve argued here after his dust-up with Turkey’s prime minister at Davos that he was senile and should be kept under lock and key.  This photo may be further proof that my advice should’ve been heeded.  They say that boys shouldn’t play with guns, but clearly Peres’ mom didn’t tell him that either.  As a former defense minister, he clearly loves playing with the toys.  I’d guess that if he didn’t need a walker he might’ve wanted to mix it up with those dirty Muslims on the Mavi Marmara; or be part of the al-Mabouh hit team.

I hope to God the safety was on that thing when he was pointing it.  With pictures like this is it any wonder why Israel is in the trouble it’s in?

I’ll leave it to you to come up with suitable captions for the photo.  The best one will earn pride of place right underneath the image. Go to it.

Any Israelis out there who can identify the unit he’s pictured with?

UPDATE: An Israeli friend tells me that the unit is YMM, the elite Border Police counter-terror unit.  It figures he’d be photographed with some of Israel’s most brutal forces, the ones that really enjoy punishing Palestinians and don’t just do it for a job.

Marty “Party” Peretz Severs Ties to TNR, Closes Blog

Saturday, February 12th, 2011
Marty Peretz

'Marty Party' in Israeli exile (Amit Shaal)

Recently, the NY Times actually sent a reporter all the way to Israel to document the weirdness of Marty Peretz’s life (Martin Peretz: Not Sorry About Anything).  Among other things, the profile revealed that senior editors at The New Republic, which he used to own, are mortally embarrassed by his flaming racism.  At the time the story was being preapred for publication, they were seeking to oust him from any direct editorial involvement with the publication.  The Calcalist story that follows reveals that this has happened, though Peretz denied in the Times that it would.

In some sense, both the Times profile and the Calcalist interview I cover below are premised on this agent-provocateur-type statement from Peretz’s now defunct blog, The Spine:

Last September, in the wake of a number of bombings, Peretz posted: “Muslim life is cheap” and “I wonder whether I need honor these people and pretend they are worthy of the privileges of the First Amendment, which I have in my gut the sense that they will abuse.”

The Israeli online finance-economics blog, Calcalist, features a riveting (as in watching a car accident happening before your eyes) interview with ‘Marty Party’ (as the headline calls him) in which he tosses off racist bon mots like there’s no tomorrow.  Here are some of the more choice ones.  This is a defense of his racist comment about Muslims and the First Amendment:

I didn’t say anything I hadn’t said 100 times before.  Lives of Muslims are cheaper than those of other religions.  They’re much more likely to kill.  What IS true is that I wrote one stupid sentence.  To say that they aren’t worthy of enjoying the privileges of the First Amendment is idiotic.  I simply wasn’t thinking.  That’s the problem with these blogs.  You write and done’t read what you’ve written and then hit “Send.”

Clearly Peretz has a finely developed sense of victimhood and no shame whatsoever.  Imagine a blogger who admits he doesn’t read what he writes before he publishes it!  I freely admit I make mistakes in writing this blog at times, but at least I proof what I write and edit it before hitting MY Send button.

The interviewer questions Peretz on his pro-Israel advocacy as integral to the editorial slant of TNR:

I asked him whether it was true that he refused to employ writers who criticized Israel.  ”Yes,” he said without hesitation.  I don’t see what’s so shocking about the owner of a newspaper who hires writers who support Israel.  It’s what happens at all newspapers.  An editor wants people who will serve his [editorial] slant.

Actually, that’s not the position of most editors, certainly not newspaper editors.

The Calcalist interview reveals that Peretz has severed virtually all ties with TNR, which is news:

One month ago, after the storm broke out [over his comments] he decided, with the advice of his partners, to resign from an active role in the publication, close his blog, and take a long holiday in Israel.

Among Peretz’s many hates is Jerusalem:

He hates the disgusting high-rises, the Haredi problem and the “Arab problem.”  On the other hand he loves Tel Aviv, which has no Arab problem, no Haredi problem and high rises that don’t disgust him.

He appears to be a fan of Bibi.  In this passage, he also throws in some absolutely absurd judgments of Obama’s “bond” with Israel:

I’ve known him for 30 years.  Ever since we did a trip to the Negev in the 70s we’ve kept in touch.  He’s a smart man who likes to talk.  He faces a situation that isn’t easy.  Obama is the first president since Eisenhower who has no emotional bond to Israel.

While he may like Bibi, he loves Barak and doesn’t understand the loathing many Israelis feel for the man.  The fact that Peretz compares him favorably to Larry Summers, another controversial and loathed individual, is telling:

It’s simply disgusting.  You can’t say anything good about him at dinner [with friends] and leave in peace, he says with a smile.  He’s [Barak] one little smart guy.  Like Larry Summers, there are few in politics who can think as quickly.  In the U.S. Army they love him.  But you [Israelis] hate him.  He has personality problems, sure.  Nobody’s perfect.

Peretz compares Ehud Olmert, past mayor of Jerusalem, favorably to Teddy Kollek, because the latter:

…Liked to be seen drinking coffee with Arabs while garbage was strewn in the streets.

Because Kollek raised substantial sums from rich Jews, this becomes a flaw for Peretz, who calls him an “ass-licker.”

The worst thing about Shimon Peres is that he:

Sells people this idea of the “new Middle East.”  What a fraud.  He lets fly with all these statements and all this bullshit in spite of the fact that he, and everyone, knows there will be no peace agreement anytime soon.

Nice to know that Marty detests the peace process and not only doesn’t want it to work, doesn’t believe it will.

On Obama’s “pro-Muslim” agenda:

I made a big mistake when I believed him when he said he would be committed to Israel.  He isn’t driven by the Jewish narrative.  He’s driven by the Muslim narrative.  Throughout his presidency he’s expressed support for the hijab four times.  If you’re a western liberal president, at least don’t say anything.

When asked why Obama supported the Egyptian Revolution, Peretz revealed his support for the recently overturned Egyptian Pharaoh, Hosni Mubarak.  Peretz also underscores his absurd ignorance of contemporary Iranian politics:

Because it’s based on Islamist principles.  Look at the Iranian [Green] Revolution which he refused to support [!] despite the fact that the Iranian regime hates the U.S.  But the Cairo Revolution he supported despite the fact that Mubarak demonstrated loyalty to the U.S.  The reason is simple: in Iran the revolution was secular and sought to erase Islamist influence [!].  In Egypt, on the contrary, the Muslim Brotherhood is taking an active role and when Mubarak leaves, they can take over the government.

When you read nonsense like this you wonder how this guy managed to have the ear of an audience for as long as he did.  How did he have the respect of anyone who was serious?  It’s fine to be a provocateur, but at least make a minimal effort to know something about your subject before you make an utter fool of yourself.

Thanks to Ofer Neiman for pointing me to the Calcalist story.

Barak Leaving Labor: Rats Leaving Sinking Ship

Sunday, January 16th, 2011

Put this under the category: the Mystifying Doing the Inscrutable.  Ehud Barak will announce that he and four other members of the Labor Knesset delegation will leave the party and form a new faction to be called–get this–”Independence” (other suggested names, “The New Center,” the “Jewish Democratic Zionist Center,” what a mouthful!).  This is the same guy who is the current chairman of the Party!  Two other prominent Labor Party leaders, Amir Peretz and Eitan Cabel, are about to jump to Kadima.  This, at long last, is the final gasp of the once illustrious party.  It’s a Party that Shimon Peres really killed off when he deserted it for Kadima at Ariel Sharon’s behest.  Perhaps it was brain dead even before then.

But until Barak finally drove a stake through its heart Labor was walking, zombie-like (sorry for mixing my monster metaphors) through the Israeli political landscape.  Now it is dead or will be shortly.

The Labor Party chief seems to have foreseen a vote within the Party to withdraw from the ruling coalition, which would’ve forced Barak to give up his coveted defense ministry portfolio.  He made clear that he feels he was driven from the Party by leftists who had no interest in advancing the peace process represented (!) by the current government.

Barak’s betrayal will further splinter the liberal center.  In the next election he will be lucky if he saves his own seat.  The other three MKs who jumped ship with him don’t have a hope in hell of earning enough votes to get them back into the Knesset.

The death of Labor will strengthen Kadima numerically.  But it will most help the Likud, since there will be no principled liberal alternative to it.  It will also strengthen Hadash, since it will assume the mantle of the last viable truly progressive Israeli party (I won’t even talk about Meretz, another zombie party–dead party walking).

I would say Barak is like a rat fleeing a sinking ship except that this rat gnawed through the ship’s hull and caused it to sink.  Now, he’s only confirming what everyone but him knew all along.

‘President Peres: Save Us from Ourselves’

Monday, August 30th, 2010
Israel iran war scenario

Notice that the 'scenarios' make no provision for Iranian counter-attack. Do they think there will be none?

Noted Yediot Achronot columist, Yigal Sarna, writes a plaintive “letter to the President,” asking Shimon Peres to intercede to stop war with Iran.  It is a touching and deeply- felt piece:

A Letter to the President:

Save Us from Ourselves ["from our own hands"]

Mr. President:

I turn to you because you are the elected official I’ve known best since I was a boy, standing on Keren Kayemet Boulevard with my father, I was shaking hands with a very short, white-haired man who got out of a big car.  This was the great man of the nation who founded it all, your rabbi and teacher was David Ben Gurion.  You were a young man then, but involved in everything.  Architect of diplomatic relations with France, the first atomic reactor [Dimona], armaments and construction, relations with the Persian Shah.

A generation comes and a generation goes.  You remain with us.  Full of lofty plans, you made a mess and fixed it, supporting the Hilltop settlers and compromise.  You were an oracle and accomplished as much as the chief of staff.

In a country in which everything shone at the height of its glory and then disappeared as if it never was, you remained at the heart of things.  The world turned upside down.  Empires were lost.  The globe was completely different.  And you who were active in the days of Eisenhower are still with us.  As popular as ever.  Perhaps because a country that has no father embraces a grandfather.  In a country which ruined so many opportunities, they are drawn to the last of those with deep experience.

I turn to you as a citizen because more than once when things were rough and no one could save us from trouble, you appeared and did. you saved us…

You and Yitzhak [Rabin] tried to save us from ourselves, from our zealotry, from our weakness.  Like Yitzhak, you knew that our military power would wane in a country moving from ideology to material greed as its motivating idea; that if we did not solve the conflict–we would be sunk.

Now I turn to you with a desperate plea.  Not to pronounce a polished, multi-faceted plan at the age of 87; not to exhaust yourself with a thousand deliberations as in the days of Oslo, but instead to put on the brakes.  To prevent a folly, dangerous and pointless as no other; to stop the war with Iran.  Use all your influence with the security apparatus, its advisors, its senior officers and those so brilliant at reading maps, to stop the air assault which will rain down on us a catastrophe to last generations.

Stop this ruinous miliary idea, whose source is in the reflex of those who devise new weapons systems and generals to make us forget the wounds of the past.  You know better than all of us that no bombing of Iran will eliminate its nuclear capacity, if it even exists.  This [Iran] is a land as vast as a continent, hidden and closed, which can buy whatever it needs.  Anything that is blown up will bloom anew.  The damage will be erased in a heartbeat, but the war of vengeance will begin, which Iranian forbearance and its ability to absorb hundreds of thousands of casualties and great suffering–will be something we’ve never before known in the history of this conflict.

Even according to the most optimistic scenario, the air bombing will instill Iranian vengeance which will lead to the deaths of thousands of Israelis.  I turn to you because there is no one else to turn to.  Overseeing the security services, which are consumed [obsessed] by conflicts are two elected officials, a prime minister and [defense] minister each thrown out of their jobs by the electorate in the past because of their serious failures.

The military service has already inflicted on us a series of failed, impotent military operations against mere rockets.  This is an institution unsuited to return a lost soldier home, one imprisoned in Gaza.

I turn to you, Mr. President as a man sentenced to life in prison turns to his president, as a last resort: save us from our own hand ["what our own hand might do"].

What is especially touching and aggravating about this piece is that Sarna turns to Peres because he knows there is no other address in government for his entreaty.  He does so out of desperation, that of a man who knows his world is about to implode and that there is precious little he can do about it.  He reminds me of one of those desperate characters that Rod Serling portrayed so brilliantly in the Twilight Zone, men filled with terror and aware of their impending doom.

God [or Obama?] help us and Israel if Sarna’s nightmare comes to pass.

Settlement Businesses Moving Within Green Line to Avoid European Boycott

Monday, June 21st, 2010
israeli boycott ahava

Europe targets settlement products (Activestills)

Kol Yisrael radio reported yesterday that three businesses located in the settlements plan to move to an industrial park within northern Israel so as not to become caught up in the European campaign to target settlement products.  The report noted that there are 70 such businesses within the current settlement industrial area which employ 5,000 workers.  BDS is having an impact.

Even Israeli President Shimon Peres understands, according to Ben Caspit in Maariv, that:

Time works against us.  He worries about a quickening deterioration and tightening economic boycott against Israel, the total loss [to Israel of former allies] of the Arab world, collapse of the peace process and American alienation [from Israel].

He apparently does have moments of lucidity despite his performance at Davos with Erdogan.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE