Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘sheldon-adelson’

Palestinian Attempts to Buy Bankrupt East Jerusalem Real Estate Project, Debtholders and Residents Scandalized

Sunday, January 9th, 2011
nof tzion protest

Rightist protestors' placards: 'Nof Tzion is our (Jewish) home.' 'Jerusalem is Jewish, not Palestinian.' 'Don't sell Jerusalem to Palestinians.'

The East Jerusalem real estate  project known as Nof Tzion has been in deep financial difficult for months.  Then along came a white knight who offered to buy it, invest in it and pay off the outstanding loans of debt holders (at 60 agurot on the shekel).  The buyer’s attorney was Dov Weisglass, former confidant of Ariel Sharon.  All appeared to be glatt kosher.  That is, until the debt holders and residents of Nof Tzion discovered who the lead investor of the Cyprus-based venture was:, Basher Al-Masri, a Palestinian businessman.  Then all hell broke loose:

“This is an essential test of Zionism,” a Nof Zion resident said.  ”It would be the first time that Jewish land would be sold to a Palestinian.”

The irony seems lost to her that the founding of what became Israel was based on the purchase of land (back in the days when Jews actually bought land from Palestinians rather than stealing it) from what were then known as “Arabs.”  What’s good for the goose should be good for the gander, no?  And what does she mean by “Jewish” land?  How can a piece of land be intrinsically Jewish or anything else?  Did God say when he created it that only a Jew could ever own it?

At any rate, pure business, which is what this should deal should be if Israel is based on a capitalist rather than a Jewish cronyist model, seems to have taken a back seat to Jewish jingoism.  Another complicating factor was that one of the partners in the failed venture is the brother of Jerusalem’s nationalist, anti-Palestinian mayor.  It would look bad to the mayor and his political backers for a Jewish venture to be sold to a Palestinian.  A decisive vote on accepting the Palestinian offer has been postponed. And now there are rumors of an American-Jewish white knight whose aim is to torpedo the Palestinian offer.

Whatever racialist motives there were for delaying a vote and proceeding with Al-Masri’s offer weren’t reflected in the buyer’s own statement of his interest and intent:

This is business.  I’m no politician.  But rather a businessman of Palestinian nationality who knows how to work.  If my business benefits my own people, then I feel even better.

What alarms the Jewish investors and residents is that Al-Masri plans to complete the construction of the remaining 300 units in the complex and sell them to middle-class Palestinian buyers.  The Palestinian portion of the development would be separated physically, according to the description offered by Ynet, from the Jewish portion.  One of the fears being bruited about is that if Al-Masri does take over the project he will refuse to sell to Jews out of Palestinian nationalist motives.

No one yet knows the identity of the Jewish investor-spoiler who’s trying to take the project out from under Al-Masri.  There is a rumor that it may be Sheldon Adelson, though I don’t know how much weight to give to it.  Of course, Irving Moskowitz is another possibility though I believe he lives in Israel now and I’m not sure I’d describe him as “American” as the article described the mystery man.

If the Palestinian offer is spurned then I think it becomes impossible to say that Jerusalem isn’t an apartheid city.  If parts of the city are inalienably Jewish and may not be purchased by a Palestinian even under the terms of Israel’s capitalist system, then what else can you call it?

Taglit-Birthright and Birthright Unplugged to Merge

Monday, November 8th, 2010
taglit le'kulanu

New itineraries for revamped Birthright tours

One of the more riveting and unexpected announcements of this year’s General Assembly (GA) of Jewish federations is that the Taglit-Birthright program has decided to merge with Birthright Unplugged and welcome Jewish and Palestinian youth together to return to their ethnic roots in the Holy Land.  The group, to be renamed Birthright for All (Taglit Le’Kulanu), will adopt the slogan:

Israelis And Palestinians. Two People, One Future.

The new group is the inspiration of Youth Against Delegitimization (YAD), which is sponsored by the Jewish Council of North America (JCNA).  YAD believes that the real way to ensure Israel’s legitimacy is by embracing its identity as a nation of Jews, Muslim and Christians.  Hence the decision to add Palestinian youth and staff to the trips.

It is rumored that hedge fund titan and purported Israel-hater George Soros and Palestinian entrepreneur Sam Bahour engineered a coup, wresting control of Taglit from Sheldon Adelson and Michael Steinhardt, its current neocon funders.  When Soros promised the board that he would triple funding and bring an extra 100,000 Diaspora Jewish youth to Israel, it voted to endorse the radical shift in the group’s mission.

The struggle for control of the group has initiated a free-for-all among other right wing funders, with a rumor that Dr. Irwin Mieskeit, noted bingo king and hospital reseller, is angry at the loss of Birthright as a re-education tool for Diaspora Jewish youth.  He is rumored to be considering founding a competing group to be called, My Birthright Not Yours, which will only visit sites sacred to the settler movement.  Included in this group’s tours will be paramilitary training, personal audiences with Mossad hitmen, briefings with IDF commandos preparing them for their next targeted killing assignment.  Parents of tour participants will even be offered shares in Dr. Mieskeit’s real estate projects which are miraculously transforming East Jerusalem into a Jewish city once again.

In comments offered jointly to Arutz Sheva and New York Jewish Press, Mieskeit is reported to have said about the new group:

A bruch on them, we can never support this Birthright fraud nor an effort to bring a more balanced view of Israel.  Who needs balance?  We know right from wrong.  We’re right, they’re wrong.  With those Birthright shmegegees, the next thing you know they’ll be talking about Nakba and Palestinian suffering, wah, wah, wah.  Crocodile tears.  That’s what it is.

Look, let’s be honest.  A little Holocaust trauma goes a long way when you’re trying to steal the land of another people.  I’m not above making Jewish girls cry if it helps me buy the Shepherd Hotel for a song and a dance.

Birthright tours under the old regime were noted for making shidduchs and producing new Jewish couples to take their place proudly on the stage of Jewish history.  Dr. Mieskeit invoked a hidden fear of many Jews thinking about sending their children on intimate tours with Palestinians:

We’ve already got enough Jews marrying out.  Do we need those Palestinian boys shtupping our girls, knocking them up and producing little half-breed Jewrab babies?

Returning to Birthright for All–now, for the first time the program will be open to Palestinian youth as well, enabling them to rediscover their connections to the land of their forebears.  Instead of avoiding the Territories as previous Birthright tours did religiously, the new tours will include travel throughout Israel and the Territories.  In a first, the new Birthright proposes to visit both settlements and their next door neighbor Palestinian villages.  While a Birthright for All spokesperson said that tour participants may help with the Palestinian olive harvest, insurance and legal liability will prevent any of the young people from participating in the pogroms sponsored by the settler youth.

Here is a statement from the new organization about its goals:

Taglit Lekulanu will introduce a more realistic perspective on Israel by exposing participants to both Jewish and Palestinian narratives. The trip will be open to Palestinian and Jewish Americans and staffed by both Jews and Palestinians.

The trip will bear witness to the occupation, spending a morning with MachsomWatch at West Bank checkpoints and taking tours around the Separation Wall and Hebron. There will also be meetings with Palestinian human rights activists and a visit to Jewish settlements in East Jerusalem.

Inside Israel, meetings with IDF officers and Jewish Agency representatives will be complemented by meetings with Israeli anti-occupation activists and civil rights organizers struggling for equal rights for Israel’s Palestinian citizens. Participants will also visit unrecognized Bedouin villages in the Negev and learn about the social struggle of Arab Jews. And of course there will be time to explore Tel Aviv’s famed nightlife and shopping.

Make sure they tell ‘em about all the real estate opportunities available in Jaffo through evicting poor Arabs from their run down apartments, tearing ‘em down, and turning ‘em into luxury condos for white Jews.  This way they can realize their Zionist dreams of rebuilding the homeland while making a handsome profit at the expense of the lowly and downtrodden Arab usurpers.  That oughta keep ‘em comin’ back for more…

Note: Events related above may or may not take liberties with fact.  They certainly bear a greater resemblance to truth, at least as I see it.

Adelson Promotes Outsourcing U.S. Jobs to China

Thursday, October 28th, 2010
sheldon adelson

Mr. Adelson: how many terms are you buying for Bibi? (Leila Navidi)

In case you ever needed an example of a wealthy, powerful corporate titan who can thumb his nose at many of the commonly accepted notions in contemporary American political life and get away with it, let’s take Shelly Adelson.

As recently as a year ago or so his entire gambling empire hung in the balance.  His Las Vegas property was hurting due to the ailing U.S. economy, China had sharply curtailed visas for its high-roller citizens to lose their wads of cash at his Macao casinos, he put a major development there in the deep freeze.  But somehow, with some deft renegotiation of outstanding loans and thanks ironically to the Obama administrations bringing the U.S. economy back from the brink, Shelly is sitting pretty once again.

But the man truly has balls.  Think Progress reveals that among the lies the Chamber of Commerce has told about its foreign affiliates is that only American firms are members, when in truth foreign firms belong to them as well.  And at least 80 foreign firms are participating in the Chamber’s $75-million blitzkrieg attack on the Democratic Congress.  A case in point is the Chinese-American Chamber, which worked closely with the Chinese government and the American Chamber to create a series of business seminars, which taught the basics of outsourcing American jobs to China.  Shelly Adelson, no doubt owing many favors and much wealth to his Chinese masters, hosted a series of such workshops in Florida.  You remember that sucking sound that Ross Perot noted during a presidential debate?  The sound of U.S. jobs leaving this country and going abroad?  Well, that’s Shelly Adelson sucking those jobs and sending them off to his pals in China.  Can you think of any two issues less popular in the American electorate than outsourcing and China?  Yet there’s Shelly standing tall on behalf of things most Americans hate.

Many of the companies donating to the Chamber’s slash and burn ad campaigns are foreign outsourcing companies who will benefit from the continuing job drain from this country.  1.4 million American jobs have been outsourced since 1994 in the nine states in which the Chamber is spendning most heavily in this election cycle.

I’ve just been perusing the Adelson Foundation 2008 990 Report and it contains a few eye-openers.  Among the far-right philanthropy which he supported was: $28-million to Birthright (down substantially from previous years);  $1.6 million to the Shalem Foundation, his Likudist think tank which also employs/ed Michael Oren and Natan Sharansky; $250,000 to Mort Klein’s pro-settler Zionist Organization of America; $150,000 for Endowment for Middle East Truth (EMET) which has promoted the Obsession anti-jihadi film; $100,000 to the “American Islamic Conference” (an error, which should read “American Islamic Congress“), a group of anti-jihadi neocon Muslims on whose board sit Zuhdi Jasser and Kahleel Muhammed (both of whom were featured in the Clarion Fund anti-jihadi films), and Hillel Fradkin of the Hudson Institute; $70,000 to CAMERA, a pro-Israel media advocacy group.

It should be noted that Shelly Adelson has many other ways of supporting his far-right pro-Israel goals and this foundation is only one of them.  So it doesn’t reflect the millions he’s sinking into Yisrael HaYom, the Likudist tabloid also known as Bibiton.  Nor does it reflect the enormous sums (by Israeli standards) he’s investing in Bibi Netanyahu’s election campaigns.

I wanted to return to the libertarian-inspired Donors Capital Fund founded by the Koch family, which is pouring tens of millions into the onslaught against the Democratic Congress this election cycle, which Pam Martens exposed in Counterpunch as the source of an $18-million 2008 donation to Clarion Fund.  This, in turn funded the 28-million strong DVD drop during the presidential campaign of the anti-jihad film, Obsession.

I’ve just been reviewing some of the other far-right pro-Israel gifts from DCF that year and it too is eye-opening: $25,000 to self-same American Islamic Congress, $750,000 for Daniel Pipes’ Middle East Forum, $300,000 for the pro-Israel media advocacy group MEMRI, and $155,000 to the neo-liberal, free-marketeer Friends of the Israel Center for Social and Economic Progress.

Clearly, there was at least one major Jewish donor to DCF in 2008 who funded much of this grantmaking.  In the past I considered Adelson as a suspect and he still is near the top of the list, but given her recently exposed funding of the Park51 anti-Muslim campaign, Robert Spencer’s Jihad Watch, Pam Geller’s Atlas Shrugged, and David Horowitz, I have to consider Joyce Chernick as a very likely possible suspect.  She has the means clearly, along with an obsession with funding the anti-jihadi world in grants I’ve listed here.  She could easily be our culprit.

Jewish Neocons Gear Up for Midterm Elections…Let the Good Smears Roll

Tuesday, July 13th, 2010


It’s not just Israel that refuses to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  American Jewish neocons have been proliferating so many hysterically-Islamophobic campaign outfits in the run-up to the midterm elections, you can’t tell the players without a scorecard.  There is of course the granddaddy/zaideh of smearmesiters, the Republican Jewish Coalition.   In the 2008 election, the RJC and Aish HaTorah mated (in spirit if not in body) and produced the Clarion Fund, which flacked for John McCain.  Lately it is touting its new hate-Iran film, the third in an anti-Muslim trilogy.  We can expect it to continue the same type of dirty tricks it exploited in the last election, where it spent upwards of $20-million distributing another of its Muslim-hate films to 28-million voters in swing states.

Eli Clifton and I have written about some other anti-Muslim campaign front groups which have proliferated like weeds after a Negev spring flood: Keep Israel Safe was founded by Gary Bauer and Tom Rose, who deserves credit as the Jerusalem Post editor who first moved it to the hard-right political stance it adopted after decades of centrist mediocrity; and Stop Iran Now, an ideologically wholly-owned subsidiary of Citizens United (yes THAT Citizen’s United, whom the Supreme Court offered a green light to spend countless millions smearing Democratic candidates).  The chief champion of all these groups is William Kristol and his Weekly Standard, election central for the Likudist neocon movement.

Now we have yet another mushroom sprouting after a spring rain: the Emergency Committee for Israel.  The parentage of this cuddly little package is also interesting.  Eli Clifton notes that the group was first promoted during a Campbell Brown CNN interview with Noah Pollak, the group’s executive director.  Brown is married to Dan Senor, a senior Bush apparatchik and likely major player in 2012 Republican election campaigns.

Pollak is a former assistant editor of the Shalem Center’s publication, Azure.  The Center is heavily funded by Las Vegas gambling tycoon, Shelly Adelson, Bibi Netanyahu’s moneyman and funder of the new Israeli daily, Yisrael HaYom (also known unflatteringly as Bibi-ton).  Pollak also contributes regularly to Commentary Magazine, the true zaideh of the Jewish neocon movement.

The Committee’s domain, emergencycommitteeforisrael.com, is registered to Margaret Hoover, granddaughter of Depression-era Pres. Herbert Hoover, and a former high-level Bush operative.  One hopes she will bring better luck to this enterprise than her grandfather brought to the U.S. economy in 1929 & thereafter.  As a consultant for the Republican Israel lobby, she could try a Hoover-era slogan rebutting charges of Israeli starvation of Gaza: “a chicken in every pot.”  Maybe she’ll recommend resolving the Palestinian refugee crisis by creating a series of Hoovervilles.  No wait, that’s how most Palestinians currently live.  She also participated in Rudy Giuliani’s failed presidential campaign, in which Norm Podhoretz was also an advisor who warned Iran was intent on fomenting a world war or something to that effect.  The new group’s board includes…you guessed it…Gary Bauer, William Kristol and Rachel Abrams-Dechter-Podhoretz.

If I were Pollak, I’d keep in mind what happens to mushrooms after the rains dry up: they wither and die just as these pro-Israel hate groups will do after November, and after their donors will have thrown good money after bad in funding these useless vanity campaigns which have absolutely no effect on the Jewish vote, which remains solidly Democratic.  As a test, we’ll watch the Joe Sestak PA. senate race for which the Committee has produced the hysterical campaign ad featured above.

Ben Smith’s reporting on this story for Politico features this incredible quotation from Kristol in which he actually claims that Aipac’s politics are too liberal (a view shared by the way with Shelly Adelson, if you’ve read his devestating New Yorker profile):

“Then there’s AIPAC, which is a wonderful organization, but one that’s very committed to working with the administration, so they pull some punches publicly.”

Kristol also has the chutzpah to claim he’s modeling his effort as a conservative mirror to J Street.  There is of course one major difference between the two: J Street has grassroots support, with tens of thousands of donors and over 100,000 who’ve signed up for its alerts.  The Committee has a bunch of cigar-chomping rich Jewish guys pursuing their political vanity project.

Another curious factoid about Pollak: he’s a moderator of a Porsche car forum (and a member for at least ten years).  That must be where all the lucre Pollak’s earning from Shelly Adelson and his other Jewish neocon fat cat donors is going: into his Porsche collection.  He should keep this concealed from all of his Burlington, VT. neighbors.  That, of course is Bernie Saunders country.  I don’t imagine there are too many Porsches tooling around Burlington’s streets especially not in those harsh New England winters.  I guess it won’t disturb too many of his fellow Jewish neocons that he drives a German car since so many of them are driving Mercedes, BMWs, Audis and the like.

There are additional anti-Iran front groups created by the Jewish community, which seem designed to do Israel’s bidding rather than the Republican Party’s.  Among them is Stand for Freedom in Iran, purportedly a grassroots community coalition which was in truth incorporated by the Jewish Community Relations Council of New York.  Remember too the 2008 campaign fiasco when the President’s Conference booked Sarah Palin to keynote a UN anti-Iran rally when Ahmadinejad was scheduled to address the world body.  That didn’t go over too well with the Obama campaign and most New York Jews, who detested Palin.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Clarion Fund Mystery Donor to Inject Millions in November Elections Throgh Iran Mushroom-Cloud Propaganda Film

Saturday, March 27th, 2010

Those of you who read this blog during the last presidential campaign will remember the Clarion Fund, which spent $15-million to distribute its Islam-hating Obsession to 28-million voters in swing states.  The purpose was to scare Jewish voters and others frightened of the ‘Muslim menace’ into voting Republican.  You can see how well that strategy worked.

Thanks to Sarah Posner, Justin Elliott and reader John Dickerson for alerting me to a story about those folks who brought you two perfect-storm anti-Muslim films (Obsession and Third Jihad).  They plan to do to Iran what they did to Islamism.  Note the mushroom-cloud in the film promotion and the claim that Iran will use nuclear weapons to destroy everything we in the west hold dear, including Israel.  And like their last electoral effort, this one will be timed to the upcoming November elections.

Last time around, a media expert quoted by Ali Gharib and Eli Clifton estimated that the Obsession DVD distribution cost between $15-50-million.  Justin Elliott does his homework and finds that Clarion took in $18-million in 2008 and spent $15-million, most of this on the cost of duplicating the DVD.  The Fund’s 990 report doesn’t specify who gave the $18-million, but there are any number of right-wing Jewish Republican fatcats who’d be only too pleased to do so.  In the past, several have speculated it might be Sheldon Adelson.  But given Clarion Fund is an extension of the far-right pro-settler Aish HaTorah, my money is on a fellow far-right Orthodox donor.  Someone like Irving Moskowitz or Rabbi Irwin Katsof, a billionaire co-founder of Aish.

Elliott’s piece gives us an early warning of the shenanigans planned by the Jewish crackpot-right like Clarion and the Republican Jewish Coalition.  I like to say that it’s good that they waste their money on such ineffective projects.  If they didn’t, they might actually discover an effective way to do damage against the Democrats.  Garbage like this won’t.  So I say, along with a thankfully retired president, “Bring it on.”

During the last election, much of the Jewish media featured distorted, misleading ads from the Republican Jewish Coalition touting fear of Barack “Hussein” Obama as anti-Israel.  No doubt, Clarion’s Jewish Daddy Warbucks will pay for swank ads in the same publications touting the Iran mushroom cloud film.  I’d urge them to consider what Clarion Fund is and consider the lies of their previous two films.  Jewish Week, The Forward, Haaretz and JTA clearly need revenue in this terrible climate for print media, but do they need it so badly they have to take funds promoting such garbage?

Here are a few choice quotations from the film’s finely calibrated press release:

Since the inception of the Islamic Revolution in 1979, Iran has displayed hatred for the West.  Coupled with an extremist and apocalyptic messianic ideology, this regime has terrorized the world at large for over 30 years.

…The film will document…the West’s inability to recognize the true nature of an extremist Islamic Revolutionary regime…

I was just glancing at Clarion’s website, Radical Islam, when I noticed this absolutely hilarious Facebook feed:

Al-Qaida is laying deadly “booby traps” by equipping its female suicide bombers with explosive breast implants [!] that are impossible to be detected at airport security checkpoints…

The source?  That impeccable font of anti-jihadi wisdom, Robert Spencer’s Jihad Watch!  Should we speculate how Orthodox settlers might conceal their explosives should they ever turn to suicide bombing as a tactic for killing Palestinians?  Perhaps explosive tallises (which they wear as an undergarment)?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Will Someone Tell the NY Times What is a ‘Mainstream Israeli?’

Thursday, March 11th, 2010
yossi klein halevi

Why does the NYT call this man 'mainstream?'

In an otherwise fairly balanced article about the growing movement of progressive Israelis against the Sheikh Jarrah evictions, Isabel Kershner writes this astonishingly ill-informed passage:

The case of Sheikh Jarrah also presents a predicament for some mainstream Israelis.

Yossi Klein Halevi, a senior fellow at the Shalem Center, a research institution in West Jerusalem, said he opposed a Jewish “right of return” to properties lost in the 1948 war. But he noted that more and more Arabs were buying apartments in the predominantly Jewish neighborhood where he lives.

“It cannot go one way in Jerusalem,” Mr. Klein Halevi said. “I am deeply torn.”

OK, let’s parse this.  First, you’ll note that Yossi Klein Halevi has become a “mainstream Israeli.”  This despite the fact that earlier in his life he was a leader of the Jewish Defense League, wrote Memoirs of a Jewish Extremist, and currently is a fellow of the Shalem Center, a Likudist think-tank funded by Sheldon Adelson and affiliated with such right-wing ideologues as Natan Sharansky.  Once again, this just shows how hopelessly biased and politically out of touch Times reporters in Israel are.  They are attuned to the group think fed to them by the government and its journalistic acolytes like Halevi.  But they cannot provide a nuanced account of many political issues.  Usually Kershner does better than Ethan Bronner.  But in this passage, she falls prey to his sloppiness.

Note also that the Shalem Center is given the honorific “research institution” without noting its Likudist orientation.

Kershner accepts at face value the preposterous claim advanced by hard-right supporters of the Palestinian evictions that Arabs can live in West Jerusalem and are buying apartments there (which is patently false).  In order to test Halevy’s claim you would have to know where he lives in Jerusalem.  If he lives within the Green Line his claim would be bogus.  If he lives beyond it there is some faint possibility that an Arab might be able to buy an apartment in a predominantly Arab Jerusalem neighborhood.  Overall, I find Halevy’s claim preposterous.

But even more than that, we’re talking about the Israeli government ‘legally’ stealing the property of Sheikh Jarrah Palestinians and replacing them with settlers who have even less claim to the property than the Palestinians.  Even if Halevy’s claim of Arabs buying apartments in Jerusalem were true, they would be BUYING them, not stealing them.  So if Halevy does believe in Israel being a democracy, any Arab should have the right to buy property anywhere in Israel including his neighborhood (in fact, they don’t).  The fact that he uses this supposed phenomenon to justify naked theft of Palestinian homes indicates how weak his attachment is to democracy when it comes to his Arab fellow citizens.

I also find it interesting that unlike most N.Y. Times reporters, Isabel Kershner’s name has no e-mail link so you cannot communicate with her directly through her published report.  It seems to me that this is a deliberate attempt to isolate this particular reporter from any readers who may wish to comment on her work.  Behavior I would expect from the Times’ Israel correspondents who prefer to maintain distance between themselves and readers.

In a separate comment on the Sheikh Jarrah protests, it’s interesting that they have re-energized the long dormant Israeli left.  Israelis liberals like David Grossman and Moshe Halbertal, who haven’t demonstrated on behalf of a Palestinian in years I imagine, are mentioned as supporters of this movement.  I know that some of my fellow progressive bloggers like Jerry Haber, Brant Rosen and Phil Weiss have been documenting the wonderful work done there.  I applaud this too.

The only reason that I’ve held back is that there is a tendency among progressives to read too much into a single political phenomenon.  We all would like to see a viable Israeli left.  But there simply isn’t one and no matter how wonderful the work supporting the Palestinian evictees is, this alone will not revive the left.  There are deep structural problems with the Israeli political system that cannot be fixed without radical change.  And Sheikh Jarrah, while it may lay the groundwork, cannot do it alone.  The left died for a reason and it will not come back to life unless it fixes or vanquishes what killed it in the first place.

Liberals like Halbertal and Grossman have a record of fleeing from solidarity movements with Palestinians at the first opportunity.  So I wonder whether, when they inevitably do, Sheikh Jarrah can maintain its momentum.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Shelly Adelson Buys Himself a Newspaper and a Government

Monday, December 28th, 2009
Shelly Adelson, gambling mogul and Bibi Netanyahu patron

Shelly Adelson, gambling mogul and Bibi Netanyahu sugar daddy

I’ve written here a number of times about the pernicious influence Sheldon Adelson wields both in Israeli journalism and politics through his billions spent lavishly to fund far-right causes like the Shalem Center and the free daily, Yisrael HaYom (widely and derisively known as Bibiton–roughly translated as “Bibi’s rag”).  Adelson, who made his billions off the misery of gambling addicts, loves Bibi and spent immense amounts ensuring he became prime minister and now that he is, that he stays so.  He founded from scratch Yisrael HaYom, whose politics are a neocon cross between the Daily News, Wall Street Journal and Jerusalem Post.  He spent money like it was going out of style, recruiting major journalists who worked for other papers.  Most importantly, the newstand price was right–nothing.

Exactly what one would expect to happen did: the circulation of the other Israeli tabloids, Yediot Achronot and especially the right-wing Maariv, plummeted.  Since they actually operate on an economic model and need to make a profit to survive, they couldn’t afford to match Yisrael HaYom’s rock bottom price.

In a battle to stay alive, Maariv enlisted Knesset members to draft a law which essentially would end Adelson’s support for Yisrael HaYom by requiring that all Israeli newspapers have Israeli ownership.  I’m guessing that even if this bill passed that Adelson, who must retain a team of crack attorneys for just this eventuality, would figure out a way to co-opt an Israeli to be his front-man owner.

The point is, as much as I detest Adelson and his Israeli vanity publication, this can’t be the way to go about addressing this issue.  The nativist prejudice inherent in it are offensive and objectionable.  If you believe as I do that Adelson has purchased not only a newspaper, but a virtual monopoly on political discourse through his billions, there should be a way to counter this.  Perhaps you could limit the amount an individual owner could sink into his paper without earning a legitimate return.  Or you could define newspapers that do not have an economic model in a different legal category than one that does–and then offer public funds to the legitimate newspapers to place them on a more even playing field.

I realize that each of my suggestions probably has weaknesses of its own.  But I’m sure a creative legal mind should come up with a less offensive proposal than this one.  Can it really be in Israel’s best interests to have this Citizen Kane/William Randolph Hearst wannabe peeling off wads of shekel notes to any Israeli newspaper reader or pol who will belly up to the bar?

Thanks to Didi Remez for offering us the fulsome, sycophantic praises of Adelson’s Israeli and American Jewish toadies who are also opposing the Knesset bill: Natan Sharansky, Abe Foxman and Alan Dershowitz.  Didi acutely notes that Sharansky, who frames his opposition in principled democratic terms, is deeply beholden financially to Adelson, who is the major backer of the Shalem Center, where the right-wing Israeli pol plays host to a neocon think tank.  Abe Foxman, a “good friend” of Adelson who’s flown on the latter’s corporate jet, warns Israel “don’t hurt American Jews.”  As if Israel isn’t a sovereign nation allowed to determine its own internal policies, even if they inconvenience Abe’s special chums.

I reserve my final and most derisive comments for Der Dersh who said:

“I am not sure that this bill is constitutional,” Dershowitz said…

Say it ain’t so, Al.  Israel?  A constitution?  This is the guy who puffs up his bio with accolades like ““one of [the United State's] ‘most distinguished defenders of individual rights…’”  Yet this defender of human rights neglects to remember that Israel has no constitution.  In fact, if Israel had a constitution it might actually be the democracy that shills like Dersh claim it is.  Dershowitz clearly not only doesn’t know Israel has none, he doesn’t really care about the very rights such a constitution would protect.  He cares only for Jewish rights.  You’ll never hear this man mouth a word on behalf of Israeli Palestinian citizens’ rights.  That’s because Dershowitz really sees Israel as an ethnocracy in which Jewish rights predominate.  He also, being the great human rights advocate he is, is fully prepared for Israel’s minority community to remain second-class citizens in a Jewish supremacist state.

Didi closes with this incisive critique of Dershowitz’s blind spot when it comes to the Israeli power elite:

The ease with which Dershowitz chooses to tether his reputation to financial interests, just because they share his political views, is testament to how pro-Israeli advocacy has warped the intellectual standards of some Jewish-Americans.

This brings to mind that disgusting video shot by Adalah-NY, showing Der Dersh exiting Lev Leviev’s Madison Avenue jewelry emporium with a shopping bag held triumphantly aloft.  Leviev is the darling and mega-funder of Chabad, oppressor of poor southern African miners who produce his baubles, and builder of illegal West Bank settlements.  Clearly, Dershowitz’s alliances are with the monied pro-Israel elite like Leviev and Adelson.  He has long since abandoned any pretext of supporting the rights and needs of the little man in Israel.

Leviev’s Corporate Empire Crumbles

Thursday, November 13th, 2008

Lev Leviev, diamond mogul to the stars and settlement builder to the Jews, is in similar hot water to another right-wing pro-Israel supporter and corporate magnate, Sheldon Adelson.  An Israeli business site reports today a general meltdown on the Tel Aviv stock market which hit companies like Leviev’s especially hard:

Panic in the corporate bond market spread to blue-chip stocks today, with heavily indebted holding companies taking a battering. Lev Leviev’s Africa-Israel Investments Ltd. (TASE:AFIL; Pink Sheets:AFIVY) fell 30.5%, [the] company…lost over 80% of [its] value since January, exceeding the worst nightmares of any shareholder.

Adelson’s Las Vegas Sands has lost 90% of its value due to the economic meltdown.

Though some with different political views than mine might argue that I’m being uncharitable, somehow people like these never manage to end up out on the street with tin cup in hand and I trust that won’t happen to either Adelson or Leviev.  Others might even argue that individuals with such huge egos and unforgiving hearts toward those with whom they disagree could do with a little chastening.

In addition, their corporate troubles just might rein in some of their worst political impulses. In Adelson’s case, it might curb his support for the execrable Freedom’s Watch and Republican Jewish Coalition. In Leviev’s, it might constrain his settlement building projects which have expropriated much Palestinian farmland turning it into shiny happy settlements for Israeli Jews.  He also might have to sell that $70-million palatial London mansion (at the time the most expensive residential home sale in English history) to satisfy corporate margin calls.  ‘Tis a pity.

Thanks to David Bloom for the story tip.