Muslim and Jewish Women in Nazareth

'We can live in peace'...John Lennon (photo: Dafna Tal)

Mahzor

Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘sarah posner’

Aish’s Katsof, Founder of Words Can Heal, Ignores His Own Advice When It Comes to Muslims

Thursday, October 30th, 2008

Thanks to research provided by reader RM for this post.

Sarah Posner’s article in Jewish Week goes the farthest so far in directly connecting Aish HaTorah to Clarion Fund, which has been a thesis I’ve been promoting for a few weeks now.  Also, this is the first time that any Jewish publication has run a full-length expose of the subject.  So kudos to Jewish Week and editor Larry Cohler Esses.

In her piece, she connects for the first time in any MSM article billionaire Rabbi Irwin Katsof, the founder of the Aish HaTorah’s Jerusalem Fund, to production of Obsession.  My anonymous researcher holds out strongly for Katsof being the funder of the multi-million dollar production and promotion campaign for Obsession and Third Jihad.  While this is a credible hypothesis, at this point, we only can confirm that an  evangelical source has acknowledged that Aish HaTorah contributed lavishly to their efforts to promote the film.  The fact that another evangelical source referred to Clarion Fund as funder of the same project indicates that the two groups are, for all intents and purposes, interchangeable:

[Judeo-Christian View publisher Gary] Cass was vague as to how his publication acquired DVDs for the mailing. He said they came from Clarion but declined to say if they were purchased or contributed. Referring to Clarion, he said, “Let’s just say we have a good working relationship with them.

Here’s what Posner has to say about Katsof:

Formal or informal, the ties between Aish HaTorah and the production of the films appear to date back to the launch of the media watchdog group Honest Reporting by the founder and former executive director of the Jerusalem Fund of Aish HaTorah, Irwin Katsof, in 2001.

Honest Reporting, also a tax-exempt organization, released “Obsession” in 2005…The group now denies any involvement in the production of “Obsession.” But its Web site promoted it as an Honest Reporting project in 2005, the year it was first released. It listed “Obsession: The Movie” as an “affiliate” on its Web site in 2006. “We had nothing to do with it,” said a person answering the organization’s New York telephone number.

Katsof, who founded the Jerusalem Fund of Aish HaTorah in 1995 in Los Angeles, claims on his Web site to have launched Honest Reporting in 2001. Honest Reporting, known initially as Middle East Media Watch, stated on its Web site that it was started “at the initiative of the Jerusalem Fund of Aish HaTorah.”

According to both organizations’ tax returns, Katsof was the president of the Jerusalem Fund and executive director of Middle East Media Watch when the Jerusalem Fund lent Middle East Media Watch $158,000 in 2001. Honest Reporting’s tax returns also show it received a $48,000 grant from Aish HaTorah in Jerusalem in 2002.

Reached by phone, Katsof would only describe himself as a “real estate developer.” A spokesperson later said that Katsof had not had worked for Honest Reporting since 2001, and had not worked for the Jerusalem Fund of Aish HaTorah since 2004. But Honest Reporting’s 2004 tax return lists Katsof as the organization’s unpaid executive director. Like the Clarion Fund, Honest Reporting currently shares an address with Aish International, Inc., the fundraising arm of Aish HaTorah, and the Aish HaTorah Jerusalem Fund in New York.

It hasn’t yet been reported that Katsof founded the non-profit, Words Can Heal, drafting Hollywood celebrities and D.C. politicos (including John McCain) around the milquetoast mission of ridding America of bullying and promoting civility in national discourse.  Apparently though, the group’s mission only includes Judeo-Christian citizens and doesn’t extend as far as Muslim-Americans.  Otherwise, one wonders how Katsof can justify the hate spewed against them in Obsession and Third Jihad.  Is this Katsof’s idea of civility?

Here’s a few suggestive passages which reveal the utter hypocrisy of the group:

According to Irwin Katsof, Co-Executive Director for WordsCanHeal.org, “In the post-Columbine era we need to reduce gossip and verbal abuse that is behind so much pain in our society…”

Says Katsof, “the first step is for people to acknowledge that gossip and verbal abuse has real consequences. Words can cause real pain…”

The Washington campaign coincides with the proposal of a “WordsCanHeal Day,” an effort led by Senators Harry Reid, Sam Brownback, Tom Daschle and John McCain.

Print ads aimed at bringing a new tone to American politics will begin this week…

When we recognize that these films have been inserted into the presidential campaign on behalf of John McCain, one wonders what Katsof means by “new tone” unless it’s to sink political discourse even deeper into the gutter than it already is.  Not to mention the horrible slurs and racism which characterize the portrayal of Muslims in these films.

Finally, I chuckled at this quotation from Alan Dershowitz, the man who singlehandedly destroyed the academic career of Norman Finkelstein through slurs, calumny and character assassination:

Alan M. Dershowitz, says about the book and the campaign “We may have the right to gossip under the First Amendment, but this effort shows us that exercising this right is wrong.”

I wonder whether the Dersh was the best person they could turn to to promote their message?

Will Evans has done some good new research which further documents Aish/Clarion’s entanglement in the extremist evangelical movement as they promote Obsession and Third Jihad.

Foxman: Shillin’ for Palin and Jews for Jesus

Sunday, September 7th, 2008

Abe Foxman is now shillin’ for Sarah Palin.  Many of you know that just a few weeks ago Sarah Palin’s church, with her in attendance, welcomed the director of Jews for Jesus into its midst.  In his sermon he said, among other hurtful things, that Israelis killed in terror attacks died because of God’s judgment against them for not accepting Jesus.  After listening to this hateful nonsense, the Church took up a collection for the group’s deceitful proselytizing among Jews.

Palin’s handlers have told JTA that while she was there when he spoke that she didn’t agree with his sentiments.  I wish Ben Harris had asked the handlers whether Palin chipped in when the collection plate came around.  Did she give to Jews for Jesus?  Apparently, for the campaign, this denial is sufficient and they think the issue will go away.  But I’d like to know why she attends a Church whose pastor believes that Jews for Jesus actually does Jews a favor by providing them an opportunity to return to the embrace of “Our Lord and Savior?”

…We wish to extend your grace back to your [Jewish] people. And we pray and we ask that as a result of this time here, and as a result of this offering [for Jews for Jesus], there will be people among the Jews today who come to say the name ‘Jesus’ with faith.”

And why does she belong to a Church which believes that gay people can be turned back into heterosexuals?

Equally disturbing, was Abe Foxman’s hypocritical dismissal of the danger of such evangelical proselytizing:

The Anti-Defamation League, which has been deeply critical of Jews for Jesus…said it had no problem with Palin’s membership in a church that supported efforts to convert Jews.

The ADL’s national director, Abraham Foxman, told JTA that Protestant evangelizing to Jews was entirely different from Catholics praying for Jewish conversion, which the ADL has sharply criticized.

They did not have the Inquisition. They did not go on a Crusade. They did not kill Jews for 2,000 years,” Foxman said. “They have a belief; they’re entitled to their belief.

Besides, he said, there is no evidence that Palin shares Brickner’s views.

“If you could tell me that she approves of this guy, she invited him, I’m not aware of any of that,” Foxman said. “The fact that she belongs to a church that believes in it, I don’t have a problem.”

Somebody ought to read Abe his own organization’s press release criticizing Jews for Jesus as being “deceptive and offensive.”  How can he criticize the group and then turn around and say that evangelical churches that host Jews for Jesus are doing nothing wrong?

And how ignorant can one be in dividing up Christianity into good and bad?  Protestants have been just as anti-Semitic historically as Catholics.  The only difference is that Protestantism has existed for a shorter time and thus been able to do less damage.  Martin Luther, who turned against the Jews when they didn’t convert en masse as he hoped, wrote The Jews and Their Lies.  And does one need to remind Abe that plenty of German Protestant pastors endorsed Hitler’s murderous policies?

Clearly, Abe’s covering for Palin and trying to deflect legitimiate criticism from Palin and her church.  Let it not be said that the ADL is a non-partisan operation.  Somehow Barack Obama’s black church was anti-Semitic and the candidate had to take personal responsibility for the hate spoken there; while Palin is treated to an entirely different standard.

Abe must’ve been persuaded that Palin is a friend of the Jews by the state’s Chabad rabbi who called her a great friend of Israel.  On what basis?  She signed a bill recognizing Israel’s 60th anniversary!  I kid you not:

Gov. Palin signed a resolution in June of 2008 recognizing Israel’s 60th anniversary and the unique relationship between Alaska and the Jewish State, especially the fact that Alaska Airlines played a critical role in the rescue of 40,000 Yemenite Jews in 1948 and 1949.

All I can say is that if this is enough to convince the good rabbi that Sarah Palin loves us, he’s a very cheap date.

I wonder if Abe is at all concerned with Sarah Posner’s report that as governor, Palin signed a bill recognizing Alaska Christian Heritage Week.  So much for separation of church and state.  One wonders whether there was an Alaskan Jewish Heritage Week.  Or why a state should recognize any particular religion’s heritage.

On a slightly different note, remember all that “executive experience” Palin touted in her convention speech?  Well, if you read longtime Wasilla neighbor Anne Kilkenny’s long critique of Palin’s career, you’ll find that she tried to fire the town librarian for refusing to ban books, for which she was nearly recalled.  Seeing the handwriting on the wall, the librarian later quit her job and moved to Fairbanks.  Palin also successfully fired the town’s police chief, who sued for wrongful termination, and several other senior town staff hired by the previous mayor, a Democrat.  While she won the court case, the price was that a town of 5,000 had to hire a professional administrator to run the town because her “executive” decision-making was so deficient.

It can’t be any wonder after firing Wasilla’s police chief that she went after the state’s chief law enforcement officer after she became governor.  All because he rightfully refused to fire her brother-in-law who was in the middle of divorcing her sister.

What becomes clear in Kilkenny’s assessment is that Palin has no strong ideological identity.  She is not wedded to any particular philosophy.  She throws an idea out and if the public embraces it she takes credit.  If not, it was somebody else’s idea.

But her politics are very personal.  Anyone who has ever crossed her becomes an enemy for life (I guess she hasn’t heard about Christian forgiveness).  Kilkenny even muses that she will pay a price for her candor in writing her e mail.  But because of her disenchantment with Palin it is a price she is willing to pay.

In the spirit of Christian forgiveness, perhaps Sarah would now like to nominate Mary Ellen Emmons, Wasailla’s librarian (yes, the one she tried to fire) for the I Love My Librarian Award.