Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘peace-now’

Israeli Court Granted Gag Order in Peace Now Price Tag Attack Because Suspect’s Father is Senior Shin Bet Official

Saturday, November 19th, 2011
hagit ofran death threat

Graffiti: 'Hagit Ofran RIP'

UPDATE:I have learned that there are likely two different sets of Peace Now attackers. The suspect described below who confessed to price tag attacks is the one who phoned a bomb threat to the Peace Now office.  It is thought another perpetrator vandalized Hagit Ofran’s apartment building and her neighbor’s car. This individual has not yet been caught.  Please keep this in mind as you read the account below written earlier.

UPDATE I: I had thought that there was only a gag order against revealing the name of the suspect in this case.  But after Rotter deleted my post with a link to this blog post, it appears there is a specific gag also revealing that the father is a senior Shin Bet officer.  That’s the way the national security state operates in Israel, protecting its own.

Israeli media are reporting (Hebrew) that the police have arrested a suspect in the Peace Now price tag attacks and death threats against Hagit Ofran.  The suspect has confessed to his role in phoning bomb threats to the Peace Now office and vandalizing Ofran’s apartment building with graffiti wishing her dead.  But the family has secured a gag preventing identification of the suspect.  When he appeared in court, the father, according to Haaretz, threatened the reporters and photographers there with jail if they published anything.  He then secured a gag from the court.

Two separate Israeli sources have confirmed that the suspect’s mother is a police officer and one of these sources also confirms that the father is a senior Shin Bet officer.  This explains why the father screamed in court at the journalists: “Do you who I am?” and warned them they’d end up in jail if they violated his son’s privacy.

No one should be surprised that the son of a Shin Bet officer and policewoman should be a right-wing terrorist.  After all, police officers were among the attackers at Anatot who mauled peace activists there.  The police are also the guiding force behind the closure of All for Peace Israel.  The force is riddled with right wing extremists like Meir Rotter, who publicly wrote that settler supporters should beat up activists at the Sheikh Jarrah protests.  The Shin Bet is a bastion of right-wing extremism as well and never seems to be able to capture Jewish terrorists.  Can you imagine if this suspect had been known to the Shin Bet as a potential terrorist?  How would they deal with the child of a colleague as a criminal?  Of course, they’d protect him.

However, in this case, the attacks were so public and egregious that the police couldn’t simply make the case go away.  Though they can make it go away once he goes to court, with a minimal charge and jail time (if any).  If the parents worry that their child’s arrest and possible conviction for these acts will tarnish their reputation they needn’t fear.  It appears that most officials in this far-right government or their offspring would love to do what this individual has.  So birds of a feather not only flock together, they cheer each other on.  The father and mother are more likely to receive promotions than be disciplined.  In fact, I half expect dad to get a plum new assignment as chief of the Jewish terror section.

I do not yet know the identity of the suspect.  But any Israeli brave enough to offer the information will earn the undying gratitude of Israelis and those around the world who still believe in freedom, the rule of law and democracy in Israel and elsewhere.

Emil Grunzweig’s Assassin: ‘I Killed the Israeli Left’

Tuesday, July 26th, 2011
yova avrushmi

Yona Avrushmi, assassin of Peace Now's Emil Grunzweig (Motti Kimche)

Maariv has scored the first media interview (Hebrew) with Yona Avrushmi, the murderer of Peace Now co-founder, Emil Grunzweig.  Avrumi was freed from prison several months ago after serving his full 27 year sentence for the assassination that shocked all Israel for its brazenness.  In the interview Avrushmi argues that he single-handedly began the campaign that destroyed the Israeli left.  Though exaggerated, there is much truth to the fact that the Israeli extreme right’s willingness to use homicidal violence (and the threat of it) against Jews and Palestinians alike has been a key element in its political ascendancy.

The amount of duplicity and evil inherent in Avrushmi’s comments is breathtaking.  He is an unreconstructed Jewish terrorist, proud of murdering Grunzweig.  The idea that Israelis are kissing his hand for killing a fellow Israeli Jew (after all and unfortunately, one can imagine many Israelis who might kiss his hand if he’d killed a Palestinian) is monstrous.  But he is a perfect mirror of the state of the latter-day Israeli nationalist camp.  Willing to do whatever it takes to destroy their domestic enemies, and then willing to use whatever subterfuge necessary to avoid responsibility for their actions.

In some ways, this reminds me of the 1920s assassinations during the Weimar period by German rightists of their political enemies (like Rosa Luxembourg), which set the stage for the Nazi ascendancy.  It was through a combination of political intimidation, blackmail, coercion and legitimate political support that the Nazis came to power.  Though the Likud and most settlers are not Nazis, their tactics during the phases of their rise to power share some similarities.  One only hopes that the outcome in Israel’s case will be different than in the German one.  [Forewarning: I suggest anyone in the comment thread seeking to critique this paragraph should do so very carefully based on what I've actually written here and not based on what you believe I said.]

I can also imagine, had he known of him, that Anders Breivik would heartily approve of Avrushmi, both for the murder and the lies he used in his attempt to earn parole.

The article below was translated by George Talent for Occupation Magazine (italics are mine):

Yona Avrushmi: Thanks to Me the Israeli Left Disappeared

In his first interview since he was released from prison…the murderer of Emil Grunzweig expresses his opinions: “people want to kiss my hand.”

By Sarah Liebowitz-Dar - July 26, 2011

When Yohah Avrushmi appeared before the Prisons Service parole board, he expressed sorrow and remorse over the murder of Emil Grunzweig, of blessed memory, in a Peace Now demonstration in February 1983 in Jerusalem. He also condemned the act in many newspaper interviews over the course of the 27 years during which he was incarcerated.  In some cases he even held right-wing politicians responsible.

The latter, he alleged, had created an atmosphere of incitement with their hyperbole, which motivated him to throw the grenade. Now, free from the constraints of prison and without fear of the parole board, the 53 year-old Avrushmi speaks differently.

“There is no more Peace Now, nobody listens to them. There is no Left in Israel. After what I did, many people understood what the Israeli Left is.”

Q: Would you do it again?

Why should I attack leftists? They’ve already disappeared anyway. Why should I take the trouble to attack them?

Avrushmi, who now squats in an abandoned house in the Hatikvah neighbourhood in Tel Aviv, without electricity or telephone, considered joining the tent city protest for affordable housing on Rothschild Boulevard this week. In the interview he tells about the decision to throw the grenade at Peace Now demonstrators at the famous demonstration on the streets of Jerusalem during the First Lebanon War.

“It was a Mizrahi act,” he says. “Take note that there are no Mizrahi leftists. There’s only one Tali Fahima, most of the leftists are Ashkenazis. I thought about it a long time in advance. I didn’t like the leftists, I thought they were collaborators and traitors. I worked in a settlement and those were the opinions I heard around me. I didn’t intend to kill. The grenade is the kind that fragments into big pieces, but grenades don’t kill, they just drive people away with the shock.”

In February 1995, President Ezer Weizmann commuted his sentence to 27 years. Four times Avrushmi appealed to the parole board in an effort to have his sentence reduced by a third, and every time he was refused. The State Prosecution Service repeatedly claimed that the early release of the murderer of Emil Grinzweig would compromise the public’s confidence in the justice system and that Avrushmi still constituted a danger to the public.

“I demonstrated for Arik Sharon. In order to help him,” Avrushmi says today. “But when I needed his help, he didn’t help me. Arik Sharon betrayed me, his principles and the people who loved him. What happened to him happened because of the injustice he did. It was Yitzhak Rabin, who came from the Left, who took action to have my sentence reduced.”

At the end of January of this year, Avrushmi was released from the Rimonim prison in the Sharon. Many photographers and journalists swarmed around him when he emerged from the prison gates, but he refused to say a word, forcibly pushed the cameras aside and even tried to slap the photographers who approached him. Since then he has been silent. Now he feels free to say what is on his mind. He is particularly proud of the appreciation he receives wherever he goes, according to him.

People in the street want to kiss both my hands, the hand that pulled out the pin and the hand that threw the grenade. I go to synagogues all over the country, with friends and acquaintances, and I am greeted with admiration everywhere. Even Ashkenazis tell me, ‘congratulations, we admire you.’”

Until the assassination of Rabin Avrushmi was considered the biggest political murderer there has been here. Yigal Amir took that distinction from him. “How can you compare what I did with what he did? I wouldn’t dare assassinate a prime minister. Besides, Rabin wasn’t a leftist at all.”

Rightist Attacks Peace Now’s Director in TV Studio, Israeli Professor Calls for His Execution

Wednesday, April 20th, 2011

You know something’s dreadfully wrong when a well-known Israeli professor says to a peace activist the equivalent of “up against the wall, mother-fucker.”

A week ago Peace Now director Yariv Oppenheim was slapped in the face before the airing of a TV interview which was supposed to include an Israeli right-wing activist, Dr. Mohr Altschuler.  According to Peace Now and Al Jazeera, the attack was unprovoked and before slapping him she accused him of sending left-wing activists to interview her at her home a number of years earlier.  Oppenheim refused to enter the TV studio until police were summoned.  The authorities took witness statements from station personnel and Altshuler did not go on air.

moti kedar

Prof. Moti Kedar in 'jihadi drag'

However, another panel participant, a Likud MK accused Peace Now of participating in “an international campaign to generate delegitimization of Israel” by sharing with the U.S. embassy its reports about settlement activity in the Territories.

Apparently unsatisfied that Oppenheimer was only slapped and not punished severely enough, a far-right Bar Ilan professor, Moti Keidar, has called for Oppenheimer’s execution.  Among the jewels contained in the letter of support he wrote to Altshuler:

I learned with great satisfaction of your slapping Yariv Oppenheimer.  Good for you!  The time has come for someone with initiative to do what should be done to this dirty weakling squealer [against Israel], the least of which can be said about him that he is a traitor. In any normal nation he would’ve long ago been stood against a wall [and shot].

Imagine that Kedar views Israel as an abnormal nation because no one has the guts to kill Yariv Oppenheim.  What kind of sick souls does Bar Ilan and the entire Orthodox nationalist community nurture that they think its “normal” to execute those with whom you diagree?

In a subsequent TV interview Kedar told the reporter he was “proud” of what he wrote:

He had it coming and has it coming.  He has no idea what I see in the world.  You have no idea what troubles we find ourselves in as a nation because of what he [Oppenheim] does, characterized largely by genuine lies.

A spokesperson for Bar Ilan had the decency to say that Kedar did not reflect the University’s views in this matter (though I doubt you’ll find the president or board of trustees taking the good professor to task, because he likely reflects their views).  Oppenheimer responded by challenging Bar Ilan to fire Kedar.  Good luck with that.

If Kedar was a lone ranting lunatic it would be one thing.  But aside from his prestigious academic position, he really represents the views of a large minority of Israelis.  Every major opinion poll of Israelis confirms a decided willingness to limit free speech and the activities of NGOs which might endanger the State.  It is far too short a walk from that to seeing such figures as traitors who deserve physical punishment and even death for their activities.

I’ve already written in this blog about a Yeshiva University senior administrator who told students in Israel that they should hang the prime minister (at the time) if he gave up one inch of Jerusalem.  His punishment?  The University sent him back home on the next plane to avoid further embarrassment.  But as far as I know he wasn’t disciplined, again likely because he expressed precisely the views of many other senior leaders of the University.

Not to mention Yitzhak Rabin’s 1995 assassination at the hands of another far-right settler thug, Yigal Amir.

There is a strong undercurrent of violence among far-right Orthodox nationalists represented by the good rabbi and Professor Kedar.  And truth be told, this group is in the political ascendancy in Israel.  It may be only a short interval before some Jack Teitel nutcase actually does kill a peace activist like Oppenheimer.  After all, it was Teitel himself who injured distinguished Hebrew University professor Zeev Sternhell with a poorly placed bomb outside his apartment front door.

What I wonder is–when such violence finally does happen, what will be the response?  What will be learned?  Which views will be renounced?  Which groups, if any, will be tarnished by such violence?  My guess is that no one who should pay a price, will; that Israel is incapable of learning any real lesson from such threats of violence or actual violence.  Professor Kedar will continue opining to the world media and not be seen for the accomplice to murder that he really is.  This is why my current views of the political situation inside Israel are so dreary and downcast.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Republican Jewish Coalition: Kampeas, Besser ‘Leftist Propagandists, Weasels’

Friday, February 12th, 2010

The RJC tweet smeared round the world

The RJC may not realize it but if there is any justice in the world they’ve just stepped in a big pile of dog poop and some staffer’s head should roll.

First a little back story: recently 54 members of Congress and major peace groups (among them Peace Now, J Street and B’Tselem) sent separate letters to Pres. Obama urging him to pressure Israel to relieve the siege of Gaza.  The letters were groundbreaking for several reasons. First, I can’t remember the last time a large group of Congress members and Mideast peace groups coordinated any political activity so publicly and forcefully.  Second, never before have members of Congress been so bold as to call outright for the end of the savage suffering inflicted by this illegal siege.  This is yet another nail in the coffin of the Israel lobby and its stranglehold over such discourse in Washington DC.  In the past, publicly advocating a position sympathetic to Palestinians would have been absolute anathema.

I’m proud to declare that Jim McDermott, my House member, drafted this statement and spearheaded it together with the first Muslim-American member, Keith Ellison.  The Forward covered the story.  Here is a portion of the statement directed to Pres. Obama:

Thank you for your…commitment of $300 million in U.S. aid to rebuild the Gaza Strip. We write to you with great concern about the ongoing crisis in Gaza.

The people of Gaza have suffered enormously since the blockade imposed by Israel and Egypt following Hamas’ coup, and particularly following Operation Cast Lead. We also sympathize deeply with the people of southern Israel who have suffered from abhorrent rocket and mortar attacks. We recognize that the Israeli government has imposed restrictions on Gaza out of a legitimate and keenly felt fear of continued terrorist action by Hamas and other militant groups. This concern must be addressed without resulting in the de facto collective punishment of the Palestinian residents of the Gaza Strip. Truly, fulfilling the needs of civilians in Israel and Gaza are mutually reinforcing goals.

The unabated suffering of Gazan civilians highlights the urgency of reaching a resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and we ask you to press for immediate relief for the citizens of Gaza as an urgent component of your broader Middle East peace efforts. The current blockade has severely impeded the ability of aid agencies to do their work to relieve suffering, and we ask that you advocate for immediate improvements for Gaza…

The peace groups’ letter is slightly more forceful in addressing the siege:

We urge, therefore, that your administration use America’s unique relationship with Israel to persuade it to lift the closure of its border crossing with Gaza now.

Of course, the counter-attack has been hot and heavy.  Yvette Clark (D, Brooklyn), who is African-American renounced her support when Agudath Israel, the far-right pro-Israel Orthodox group, organized constituents to read her the riot act and publicly humiliated her at a meeting they called.  She obediently announced her capitulation.

Further, the slimeballs at the Republican Jewish Coalition have gotten in on the act.  And when they do you know something really, really dirty will come out of it.  The RJC has done nothing less than accuse two veteran Jewish journalists, Ron Kampeas (JTA) and James Besser (Jewish Week) of being “leftist propagandists and weasels.”

Why?  Because they dared to question the truth and accuracy of claims the RJC made in attacking the Congressional letter.  Kampeas had the temerity to accuse the RJC of telling an “untruth” in this statement:

These 54 Democrats expressed no concern whatsoever about the consequences their ideas might have for Israelis living under the threat of terrorism from Gaza!

Anyone who can read can see from the above passage that the Democrats who signed this letter expressed strong support for the residents of Sderot.

Besser also did something unpardonable: he implied the RJC was being racist and misleading in identifying the letter solely with its Muslim-American co-sponsor, Ellison.  The latter is a convenient target for the Republican Jewish anti-minority machine.  They don’t have much use for African-Americans OR Muslims and Ellison is the ‘daily double’ as far as they’re concerned.

Besser adds this interesting perspective to the controversy about Ellison:

…Everybody wants to blame Ellison, which raises some interesting questions, starting with this one: does being pro-Palestinian automatically mean a politician is anti-Israel? Can someone be friendly and sympathetic to both sides?

…Every time I’ve heard him speak…he’s stressed his belief that both sides in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict need to do more to live up to past commitments and take greater chances for peace. He’s spoken clearly about Israel’s need for security as part of any ultimate settlement.  He speaks the language of compromise – for both sides.

In short, he sounds pro-Palestinian without sounding anti-Israel.

Still, many castigate him  as just another Israel hater, which they seem to find even easier because of his religion.

So I wonder: are pro-Israel forces only interested in working with those who are 100 percent on their side, and defining everybody else as beyond the pale?

So for penning some relatively mild and thoughtful questions for the Israel lobby about why it demonizes everyone it can’t control, you get tarred and feathered and practically called anti-Israel.  Next thing you know they’ll be calling for Kampeas and Besser’s heads on a platter.

I know this is going to sound strange but…in a perverse way this is a good thing.  Yet another example of the lobby overreaching.  They see a chance to go for the jugular and point out the perfidy of Democrats toward Israel.  But by the very nature of their attack they’ve discredited themselves among the lion’s share of American Jewry who are more fair-minded and lucid on these same matters.

So I say: whichever RJC goon tweeted that message about Besser and Kampeas–promote him.  The higher this guy rises to his level of incompetence and pro-Israel fury, the quicker the lobby will be vanquished or turned into something truly pro-Israel.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Drafting Israeli Tourists for World Hasbara

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

Yuli Edelstein: what this country needs is some good hasbara (Dan Porges)

Ori Nir has a delightfully ironic column about Israel’s new Hasbara Ministry, yes an entire ministry devoted to Israeli propaganda.  In other countries this might be called the Information Ministry, but this being Israel–let’s call a spade a spade, it’s propaganda.  And guess who the new minister is?  Yuli Edelstein, a settler.  It figures.  Why not appoint the most controversial and objectionable type of Israeli to sell Israel’s most objectionable and controversial policies abroad?  And Israelis wonder why their hasbara falls flat…

Yuli did some polling and he decided, surprise, Israel has a problem:

Israel’s Ministry of Information (yes, there is such a thing – for the first time it is a full-fledged cabinet portfolio) recently commissioned a public opinion survey among Israeli Jews (yes, Jews only). Ninety-one percent, according to the poll, said that Israel has a “severe” or “very severe” image problem overseas. Eighty percent said that Israel is perceived as an “aggressive country” and 30 percent said that Israel is perceived as an “unfriendly country.”

How to solve it?  Well, Israelis are famous travelers and can be found in virtually every country in the world.  So why not draft them?

Edelstein told the Israeli news site Ynet last month what his solution is to Israel’s severe “explanation” crisis. “I intend to draft the millions of Israeli citizens travelling abroad to take an active part in the Israeli hasbara apparatus,” Edelstein said. He figured that over 4.2 million Israelis travel overseas annually. Soon, he said, his ministry will launch a campaign to instruct Israeli travelers how they can do the job. He’s even planning to dedicate a special website to that purpose (by the way, Israel’s Hasbara Ministry does not currently have a website).

Nir then points out that one of Maariv’s most right-wing columnists, Ben Dror Yemini (ironically, meaning “right-handed”) even he concedes Israel has a REAL (as opposed to hasbara) problem:

“It is not the Hasbara.” Here’s how it starts: “We are deluding ourselves (by believing) that it’s about hasbara; That if only we told the world how wonderful we are, everything would have been rosy for us. As one who deals a lot with the industry of anti-Israel lies, it’s hard to accuse me of not understanding the importance of Hasbara. It’s important. But let’s not exaggerate. Not everyone out there is anti-Semitic. Some love Israel. And they, even they, cannot understand us.”

Yemini goes on to point out that Israel has rebuffed Syrian President Bashar Assad’s peace overtures, Israel is consistently dismissing the Arab League’s peace initiative, and is utterly dismissing the possibility that Hamas could transform into a legitimate interlocutor. “The Image is that the Arabs are offering peace and Israel is turning its back,” he wrote, “It can be different. It is okay to say yes. The Arabs understand it. We forgot.”

Where I part company with Nir is the praise he offers to Israel’s hasbara apparatus as represented by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.  I find nothing useful or praiseworthy in their enterprise.  It is devious, and employs false pretenses, and underhanded practices in order to support an opaque agenda especially on matters like Iran.  And often it is but one-step (or less) removed from Israel’s intelligence services.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

U.S. Claims Iran Has Enough Uranium for Bomb, But No Program to Deliver It

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009

Today, the N.Y. Times reports that the U.S. ambassador to the IAEA has confirmed that Iran now has enough uranium fuel to produce a nuclear weapon.  However, it does not yet have the capability to deliver one.  The timing of this revelation in quite propitious for the anti-Iran hawks inside the Obama administration and Israel.  In fact, the Times report rather extraordinarily concedes that the document specifically does this:

The statement by the ambassador, Glyn Davies, was intended to add weight to arguments for far more severe sanctions against Iran this month, perhaps including a cutoff of gasoline to the country, if the country failed to take up Mr. Obama’s invitation for direct negotiations. But it could also complicate the administration’s efforts to convince an increasingly impatient Israeli government to give diplomacy more time to work. Israel has made it clear it would consider a military strike against Iran’s facilities..

There are two ways to parse this development.  Either the Dennis Rosses within the administration want to exert pressure in the upcoming policy review to get their way and exert punishing pressure on Iran; or Obama himself is seeking to use this announcement as a cudgel to pressure what is left of the pragmatists within the Iranian government to come to the table and negotiate.  Either development is worrying because there is the 800 lb. gorilla of the IAF lurking in the background and eager to fly off and bomb Teheran the moment it gets the say-so from Bibi, who is no doubt delighted at this news.  His trigger is no doubt inching that much closer to the trigger.

Haaretz reports that Bibi made a “secret” (nothing ever stays secret for long in Israel) trip to Moscow within recent days (keep in mind that Pres. Shimon Peres also made such a hastily scheduled visit the day after the Arctic Sea was liberated).  Netanyahu didn’t even tell the Israeli ambassador in Moscow he was coming and refused to allow his foreign or defense ministers to accompany him.  He surely visited to discuss something related to Iran.   Israel has made known its displeasure at the prospect that Russian missiles may protect Iranian nuclear facilities.  This would harden those sites and make it that much more difficult for Israeli war planes to take them out.  Russia is also a contractor in building some Iranian nuke sites.  Wouldn’t it have been interesting to be a fly on the Kremlin’s wall for that meeting?  But one wonders what Israel has to offer Russia that would cause it to withhold sophisticated defensive missile systems from Iran.

Israeli intelligence is raising the alarm with the unsubstantiated claim that Iran has renewed its program to design a delivery vehicle.  But the U.S. disputes this:

Israeli’s government disputes the American assessment that Iran’s weapons design work has been suspended for nearly six years. In classified exchanges, it has cited evidence that the design effort resumed in 2005, at the order of Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. American officials say that evidence is circumstantial, and point out that the Israelis have not produced a copy of the order or other convincing evidence.

…In the 2007 intelligence estimate, the United States said that it had found evidence that Iran had worked on making a warhead, though it said the project was stopped in late 2003. The new intelligence information finds no convincing evidence that the design work has resumed.

While the thought of Iran developing nuclear weapons is chilling and should be opposed, we must remain sober about where we really are in this process. Israel will use every means at its disposal to convince us that the sky is about to fall. But we should remember the Chicken Little story. The sky is not about to fall. It may be quite stormy and we must take notice of this. But the catastrophe predicted is not about to happen.

We should remember that Israeli intelligence is notoriously result oriented, beset with the same malady inflicted on U.S. intelligence by the Cheney war cabal: get to the result the policymakers want.  Virtually every major intelligence pronouncement from the Israelis needs to be pored over with a fine-tooth comb to discover the difference between truth and wish.

Tomorrow, American Jewish hawks will be “flying in” to D.C. for a lobbying blitz on the Hill to bolster get-tough demands concerning Iran.  Peace Now’s Debra DeLee published a strong critique of the anti-Iranian lobbying effort in JTA which should be read by everyone concerned about this issue.

Yaalon Withdraws Claim Peace Now is a ‘Virus,’ Really Closer to Very Bad Flu

Thursday, August 20th, 2009

Ah how those Israeli cabinet ministers love to bob and weave after they sucker punch their politial opponents.  The latest is Bogie Yaalon who spoke publicly in honor of Moshe Feiglin, one of Israel’s top proto-fascist settler leaders.  He’s quoted by Haaretz as saying:

Yaron called “the elites” and Peace Now “a virus” and said that when he was in the army, he used to say that “the politicians brought the dove of peace and the army had to clean up after it.”

Well, it turns out Peace Now isn’t really a virus.  It’s actually closer to a really bad cold:

Ya’alon said that he “recognized the importance of democratic discourse and respecting other opinions.”

The Haaretz headline for its article, Vice Premier Retracts Peace Now as ‘Virus’ Jibe isn’t accurate (unless there is more in the original Hebrew version that would justify this claim).  Yaalon didn’t “retract” his jibe against the peace group.  He merely made a vague vacuous statement about what a swell thing democracy is.  That and a couple of shekels will buy him a cup of Turkish coffee.

Ethan Bronner’s Mediocrity and Ir David Land Grab

Monday, May 11th, 2009

Neil Young once wrote that rust never sleeps and neither does Phil Weiss. For nearly two days I’ve been intending to write a post about the pro-settler plot to encircle Arab East Jerusalem with parks in order to reinforce a Jewish territorial claim to the land. The $120-million project which Akiva Eldar, Peace Now and Ir Amin have “outed” would serve a dual purpose of surrounding Arab neighborhoods with parkland, which would also inhibit any potential expansion or development in these communities and prevent them from linking to each other.

Wouldn’t you know that Phil got to the post before me and reported essentially the “take” that I had on Ethan Bronner’s execrable coverage of the same story in which the latter seemed oblivious to the fact that the plan is not only secret, but that it wasn’t vetted by the usual governmental planning authorities. Pro-Israel liberals like to talk about Israeli democracy, but conveniently forget that when certain political figures operate the levers of power and decide that conventional democratic oversight is “inconvenient” it somehow slips through the cracks; and no one on the Israeli Jewish side seems to notice or care much. Except, that is for Akiva Eldar.  And what is he but the typical crybaby Israeli leftist, right? Democracy? We’ve got more important things to worry about like combating the Arab population menace.

Ir David shiny happy billboard promoting its park land grab (Rita Castelnuovo/NYT)

Ir David shiny happy billboard promoting its park land grab (Rita Castelnuovo/NYT)

Returning to Bronner’s problematic approach, it is typically aimless reportage, which refuses to take a stand or analyze what is clearly right in front of his nose.  Instead of Eldar’s forthright term “secret” describing the nature of the plan and its execution, which confronts you in the Haaretz headline, Bronner buries the lede using the term “quiet” instead.  He also seems to adopt the turn of the century Zionist narrative that any territory not directly controlled by Jews is barren wasteland:

As part of the plan, garbage dumps and wastelands are being cleared and turned into lush gardens and parks, now already accessible to visitors who can walk along new footpaths and take in the majestic views, along with new signs and displays that point out significant points of Jewish history.

I guess one Arab’s piece of territory is another Jew’s “wasteland.”  And note the approving terms “lush gardens,” “new footpaths,” and “majestic views.”  Doesn’t it sound like those old Zionist brochures boasting how the halutzim have made the desert bloom??  This is inadequate journalism and what’s especially sad about it is that Bronner, if he bothered to respond to e mail sent to him by critics like me (which he doesn’t) would be entirely credulous and not have a clue why this is terribly slanted.

Further, the right-wing pro-settler private group which is both surreptitiously buying up Arab land or forcibly expelling Arab inhabitants from it is twice labelled by Bronner simply as a “private group.”  The fact that it refused to be interviewed for his article reflects merely how “delicate” the subject is, rather than a desire to continue to veil its actions in a cloak of secrecy (which is the real reason).  Only toward the end of his story does Bronner provide any context about the extremist leanings of Ir David (get a load of the money and sophistication behind this group’s website).

Bronner allocates three entire paragraphs to Israel’s bogus hasbara touting the merits of its plan:

As an official in the prime minister’s office put it in his answer: “Jerusalem has been the eternal capital of the Jewish people for some 3,000 years and will remain the united capital of the State of Israel. Under Israeli sovereignty, for the first time in the history of Jerusalem, the different religious communities have enjoyed freedom of worship and the holy sites of all faiths have been protected.

He continued: “The government will continue to develop Jerusalem, development that will benefit all of Jerusalem’s diverse population and respect the different faiths and communities that together make Jerusalem such a special city.”

Israeli officials point out that when East Jerusalem was in Jordanian hands from 1949 to 1967, dozens of synagogues in the Jewish Quarter were destroyed, Jewish graves were desecrated and Jewish authorities were largely denied access to the Western Wall or other shrines. By contrast, in Jerusalem today Muslim and Christian authorities administer their holy sites in a complex power arrangement under Israeli control.

No word from the prime minister or Bronner on precisely how this land grab will “benefit all of Jerusalem’s diverse population and respect the different faiths…”  Of course, a proper reading between the lines which you should never expect Bronner to provide would lead one to understand that Ir David’s activities will benefit one part of Jerusalem’s population and will respect one faith, and only one: Jews.

Bronner typically relegates the views of progressive Israelis on the topic to the end of the article where fewer readers will have an opportunity to read them.  Such an journalistic decision also consciously or unconsciously reveals Bronner’s editorial emphasis (or “bias” as some would have it).

Anyway, Phil got there first, darn that guy. He’s good, and I’ve got to stay one step (well, maybe a half step) ahead of him or he’ll eat my lunch. Seriously though, last weekend I was in DC and had a chance to meet Phil, Adam Horowitz and my other peace blogging buddies including Jerry Haber, Dan Sisken, Jim Lobe, Dan Luban and Ali Gharib. We had a blast over dinner at Busboys and Poets. In further conversations, we decided to try to maintain an organized presence at the J Street October conference. So if you’re on the east coast (or even Midwest) stay tuned for developments. I’m hoping J Street might be interested in dedicating part of its agenda to some panel discussions about pro-peace blogging/media and furthering the I-P peace message.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE