Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘palestinians’

Dungeons of Shabak–Version 2.0 (or 3.0?)

Wednesday, September 29th, 2010

One of the most ‘sensational’ Shabak “spy” (you’ll see why I use quotation marks shortly)  dramas of the past few months has been the “middle of the night” arrest of Israeli Palestinian community activist Ameer Makhoul–with the accompanying arrest of naturopathic pharmacist Omar Said–for allegedly spying against Israel for Hezbollah.  This incident is part of a ritual repeated every few months by Shabak both to cow Israel’s Palestinian population into submission, showing them who’s boss, and also to condition Israel’s Jewish population to suspect the loyalty and trustworthiness of their fellow non-Jewish citizens.  And it works.  Everybody seems to play their part: the Shin Bet parades the suspects and takes credit for protecting the state from treachery; while Israeli Jews (most, anyway) learn the lesson that they should never see their fellow citizens as individuals worthy of respect and equal rights.

Israeli Palestinian security suspects

Israeli equivalent of the 'Commie Bastard' perp walk of the 1950s (Max Yelinson)

Those who follow such security cases will recall that before Makhoul, we had the case of Azmi Bishara, driven out of his homeland by a secret police ‘investigation’-vendetta which accused him of serious crimes without offering any evidence.  The Shabak allowed him to leave the country rather than prosecute him, all the while trumpeting what a villain he had been.  Those with longer memories will undoubtedly remember similar cases that preceded these.  In fact, most Palestinian Knesset members at one time or another have formal police investigations opened against them based on similar, though slightly less lurid accusations.  As I said, they’re about as regular as clockwork in Israel; something akin to the old FBI perp walks of ‘Commie bastards’ in the 1950s replete with short ‘shifty’ men desperately concealing their faces with their trenchcoats and their fedora.

rosenberg arrest

The search for the bogeyman U.S.-style: the Rosenbergs arrest

A few months ago, I reported here on a new case involving Fada Sha’ar, a 27 year-old from the Golan Druze village of Magdal Shams, accused along with another resident of contact with a Syrian “intelligence agent,” who happened to be the Syrian government official responsible for the welfare of former Syrian residents of the Golan.  The man’s father and mother were also arrested and accused of being his accomplices (more likely the secret police were attempting to exert leverage over him as the FBI did by arresting Ethel Rosenberg in the famous 1950s case).

This alleged intelligence agent had offered the boy help in finding a music school at which the boy could study the traditional Arabic oud.  The funding of his studies by Syria was deemed a treasonous act causing irreparable damage to the State.  On return from a break in his studies in France he was arrested for what in reality amounts to practicing a traditional Arab folk instrument.  Of course, they gussied up the case with reports of secret meetings, threats to kidnap an Israeli soldier, etc.

As I wrote above, it’s as if the Shin Bet case officers are fans of pulpy spy thrillers.  They take a real event like the capture of soldiers along the Lebanese border, dress it up with some updated facts and names, and attempt to pass it off as the latest example of Arab perfidy.  What’s laughably ironic is that if these secret policemen were thriller writers they’d be laughed out of the room by their fellow writers: kidnapping Israeli soldiers?  Been there, done that.  Is that the best you can come up with?  But the Shin Bet knows it doesn’t have to come up with anything truly convincing, it merely has to recycle old stories and a populace conditioned to react with suspicion and horror will, like Pavlov’s Dog, do the same when the conditioned response is properly stimulated.

Now, Ynetnews reports that Sha’ar and his colleague have been indicted and accused of being Syrian agents.  As I wrote in my earlier post, read closely the language (the first example below is my translation of the opening sentence in the much fuller Hebrew version; the second from the English version) used to describe the alleged acts of these individuals and tell me whether Israeli reporters are acting as stenographers for the secret police or whether they are acquitting themselves credibly as members of the Fourth Estate:

Yet another connection between residents of the Golan Heights and Syrian intelligence uncovered.

Madhat Salah [the alleged Syrian handler]…operated both the father and the son who were arrested

What was Sha’ar’s crime?  He is alleged to have conveyed $500 each to three Israeli Druze families who have members in Israeli prisons.  For this, the boy is alleged to have received an $800 payment.  Within Israel itself, there is no doubt that there are many settlers who would consider it an honor to support convicted murderer heroes like Yigal Amir or Asher Weissgan with such funds.  In fact, the Israeli group, Honenu does precisely this.  Only when you’re a Golani Druze does such financial aid become an act of treason.

The indictment further accuses Sha’ar of receiving an e mail message from the Syrian suggesting that he kidnap an Israeli soldier.  What did the boy do?  He refused.  And again, for this he stands to lose of major chunk of his life rotting in an Israeli prison system, in which he will become undoubtedly an even more embittered opponent of Israel than he is now.

The problem with Israeli coverage of such security stories is that it acts as a mere cipher for the security services.  Reporters dutifully report what the Shabak tells them.  While they may once in a while use terms like “alleged” or “reported” or concede the story is reported to them by the government, the clear preponderance of credibility is given TO the security apparatus.  Hardly any given to the accused.  You will struggle to find any quote from a source close to the victim.  Not a family member, not a lawyer, not even a Palestinian human rights NGO.  And if they do quote a lawyer he has not even been informed of the charges by the government so he can’t speak credibly on behalf of his client.

It’s all a sad charade of due judicial process.  Even worse, it’s a charade of professional journalism.  In most western media, an editor would not let such a story run without some semblance of balance including a statement from someone representing the victim.  Only in Israel or perhaps nations like Russia, North Korea, Iran or Saudi Arabia, does journalism similarly cozy up to government power.

Only a few hours after the authorities unveiled this indictment, the Shabak trotted out a new set of Arab “traitors.” (Hebrew)  The charges against these are perhaps even more ludicrous than those of our previous victims.  Two Israeli Palestinians, residents of Shifar’am and Umm al-Fahm, stand accused of being unable to locate a weapons cache that was prepared for them near a traffic intersection.  The Ynet report doesn’t even use the term “allege” in connection with this claim.  It says: “the investigation established that…”  It states that this is what happened with no qualifier.  They were supposedly to use these weapons for a terror attack inside Israel.  After being arrested they couldn’t even lead the investigators to the buried cache.  As an aside, do you even believe that a U.S. police force would be willing to appear so foolish as to arrest criminals for possessing such a weapons haul when neither the police or the bad guys can find it??  What do you accuse them of?  Where is the evidence?  Only in Israel can such charges be made to stick in such circumstances.

The accused are also said to have been asked to recruit others to join Hamas and undergo training abroad.  Where?  Well, what nation does Israel need to smear these days?  Turkey, of course.  And did the victims agree to do this?  Even the charge sheet against them concedes that they refused.  Since when do you arrest someone for refusing to commit a crime?  Only in the Land of Oz and Israel.

Maariv claims these guys received $120,000 (Yediot bafflingly claims $200,000) in return their services ten years ago.  That’s right, some or all of this happened an eternity ago.  And yet it’s being dredged up here by the Shin Bet for the first time.  Talk about old news!

To be clear, it is entirely possible that there are Israeli Palestinians who might engage in a real crime of espionage.  I am not claiming there are no such citizens who might endanger Israel’s security.  I AM claiming that these victims are not them.  Further, Israel’s security services are a joke perpetrated on the most powerless, most discriminated against.

Why?  It’s no secret that political tension is at a boiling point both within Israel and the Middle East concerning the peace talks and the so-called “Iranian threat.”  What better way to unite Israel’s population behind its government, military and secret police than stirring up fear of the Syrian menace?  Any general or Shin Bet chief wishing to derail any chance of Syrian-Israeli peace talks need only gin up a little of this sort of mischief to make the public wary.

The only thing missing in these stories is an Iranian bogeyman.  Couldn’t the Shin Bet have dredged up a suitable Iranian mullah offering wads of cash to Israeli Palestinians in return for spilling the secrets of Dimona?  Don’t worry, that may come if things get bad enough.

New Israel Fund Caving to Im Tirzu Pressure?

Saturday, August 28th, 2010
New Israel Fund
New Jewish Israel Fund or Not Arab Israel Fund

The Forward brings distressing news that the New Israel Fund has prepared draft funding guidelines that would bar any Israeli NGO which did not endorse Israel as a Jewish state:

The New Israel Fund, the target of attacks by right-wing organizations accusing it of supporting anti-Zionist groups, is discussing the possibility of specifying in its guidelines that grants will be given only to groups that accept the idea of Israel as a Jewish homeland.

…According to three sources who have either seen the new proposed guidelines or were briefed on their content, the debate has also touched on the issue of defining the not-for-profit organizations that are eligible for receiving NIF grants. Board members and major donors are grappling with whether to require that grantees accept the idea of a two-state solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, thus agreeing to the principle of Israel as a Jewish state.

I have had my share of disagreements with New Israel Fund, most significantly when it expelled Shammai Leibowitz from one of its fellowship programs after he spoke publicly on behalf of BDS and the story was picked up by Maariv’s resident red-baiter, Ben Caspit.  But I have, throughout the Im Tirzu attacks, stood by NIF and championed its cause.  But if it follows through on such guidelines it will have succumbed to the venom spewed by Im Tirzu.  It will have caved to pressure from the Israeli right to conform its mission to a pro-Zionist one, rather than one that embraces the notion of Israel as a state that empowers all its citizens, including those who are not Jewish.

There can be no doubt that there is any Israeli Palestinian group which NIF currently funds that can support the notion of Israel as a Jewish state.  Besides, this very notion is a condition demanded in the past by Bibi Netanyahu before he would negotiate with the Palestinians.  So in effect, if the NIF “goes there,” it will have adopted Bibi Netanyahu’s political agenda.  Can this be possible?  Is this what things have come to?  That the NIF, under enormous pressure from the Israeli right, determines that it must compromise with its values in order to appease its enemies?  Does NIF really believe this will protect it from the worst of the hatred coming its way?  Does it believe such policy changes will inoculate it from attack?

If this is what NIF’s leaders are thinking they are sadly mistaken.  If they cave, the right will see this as a sign of weakness and it will crowd in for what it hopes to be the kill.  And such compromise will destroy the organization’s credibility among its Arab donees.  Who in the Palestinian community will want to accept money from it under such conditions?

Thus, under attack from its right flank and its left, NIF will be buffeted by the political winds and have no clear course.  It will be a sad day if it happens.

The Forward mentions that there is compromise wording under consideration:

According to individuals who are involved in the process, one formulation being discussed is recognizing Israel as the “homeland” of the Jewish people — a description that falls short of the definition of Israel as a “Jewish state” but would avoid alienating Israeli-Arab not-for-profits that are on NIF’s grant list.

I should mention that this indeed is wording that I sometimes use in explaining my own Zionist philosophy with the addendum that I see Israel as the homeland of its Palestinian citizens as well.  Unless this proviso is included then even the compromise wording is offensive.  Besides, why should the NIF determine within its funding guidelines the nature of the Israeli state.  This, it seems to me, takes NIF far afield from its core mission which is to build Israeli democracy and social justice.

This quotation from a former president of the group indicates a leadership that has become unnerved and unmoored in response to the onslaught against it:

Peter Edelman, a former president of the NIF board, said in a brief interview with the Forward that revising the guidelines was “not necessarily in response” to criticism. Edelman added, however, that “when there is unjust criticism, then you want to be as clear as possible about the issues.”

This is a clarity that is unnecessary and which will not diminish the attacks.  It is a clarity that will drive away the Palestinian NGO community and render NIF less effective and less relevant in an Israeli context.  It is the NIF playing by the enemy’s rules–and losing.

Finally, the headline of the Forward article is: New Israel Fund Considering Red Lines, which should have much more appropriately been, New Israel Fund Considering Blue and White Lines. If it adopts these guidelines I’d suggest it change its name to the New Jewish Israel Fund or the Not-Arab Israel Fund, unwieldy perhaps, but very descriptive.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Israel Wakes Up and Discovers Its Soldiers Abuse Palestinians

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010
eden aberjil

Eden Aberjil's Facebook images captioned: 'Army service, the most wonderful time of my life!'

Yesterday, a major scandal erupted in Israel over an IDF soldier, Eden Aberjil, who posted pictures on her Facebook account of her abusing bound Palestinian prisoners.  All Israel appears to be SHOCKED, I say shocked, to discover that its soldiers actually taunt and gloat over Palestinians in such a way.  It appears that such Israelis either don’t remember their own service in the Territories or are so old that their service predates the Intifada.  Examples of such photos are so widespread both online and privately that the real shock is that anyone IS shocked.

This scandalized reaction is further indication of the absolute disconnect between Israelis and the Occupation.  I hate to say this, but they are little better than the neighbors of the concentration camps who saw no evil and heard no evil.  It is all too easy in Israel now to be a nice liberal who tut-tuts when confronted by such images as Aberjil displayed, but who would far prefer to have the Occupation exist in some foreign or alien space they don’t visit either physically or mentally.

The IDF proclaims itself scandalized that one of its members would misbehave in such a fashion.  The company line is that its soldiers simply do not do such things. And if one does, that soldier is violating military procedure and discipline.  The entire response is a sham, a virtual Potemkin village of fine moral statements which conceal a nasty, brutish Occupation in the background.

The army is talking about disciplining Aberjil for her actions, which is utter bullshit.  There are literally thousands, if not tens of thousands of pictures out there with virtually the same content; the same blindfolded Palestinians, the same smiling IDF soldiers besides them.  Will the IDF prosecute all of them?

I hate to be a broken record but there is only one way to end this moral scandal and it isn’t by putting Aberjil on KP duty for a week.  It’s to end the Occupation entirely so that Israel’s children won’t be put in such situations to begin with.  We can see from Abu Graibh and Guantanamo that Israelis are neither better nor worse than any other occupying soldiers.  When one country occupies another the occupier victimizes the occupied.  The story is as old as the history of human warfare.  The way to stop this is to end the conflict.

Disabled Palestinian youth trapped by teargas

If you don’t believe me about the prevalence of these abusive images online then check out this Facebook site, which displays many such images taken from the Facebook group devoted to the Israeli Border Police, a particularly nasty, brutish branch of miltiary service.  It’s a pity that few of you can read Hebrew as the comments under these images are in some cases more revolting than the images.

To her credit, Aberjil has defended herself rather than bowed her head as the IDF would no doubt prefer.  It’s possible that once they work her over a bit and make her realize how much they can damage her future that she will put her tail between her legs and tell the world what a bad girl she was promising never to do it again.  But right now, she’s professing her innocence (somewhat disingenuously I might add).  The N.Y. Times quotes her as saying:

[She] said that the “pictures were taken in good will, there was no statement in them.” She added that they were not intended to humiliate the prisoners but merely to document her “military experience,” and that she had no idea they “would be problematic.”

Which is terribly disingenuous when you know that among her comments on her pictures were disparaging remarks about the Palestinian prisoners genitals.  I think it would be far better for her to argue that she did nothing that the average IDF draftee doesn’t do virtually every day of service.  They certainly see and participate in such degrading events and sometimes they even document them on video or through photographs.  Here is a sampling from a Facebook group founded to feature these images.

Among the comments for the photo:

“One of the funniest days–I can still remember there were about 100 disabled people in wheelchairs and as we began to shoot at them they all suddenly became healthy and began to run.”

“Ha, ha, ha–let’s see you with three stun grenades in your wheelchair if you don’t get up and start to run.”

The follow-up story from The Lede linked above provides comprehensive background documentation of the psychological damage that the Occupation inflicts on Israeli soldiers (and by extension Palestinians as well).

Obama Israel-Palestine Policy Founders Even in Security Council

Friday, March 5th, 2010

If this isn’t a perfect exemplar of the total disarray of U.S. policy toward the Israel-Palestine conflict I don’t know what is.  The background: after the Netanyahu government unilaterally declared the Cave of the Patriarchs and Rachel’s Tomb in the tinderbox area of Hebron to be national heritage sites, Palestinian protests and demonstrations began almost immediately especially in the Temple Mount area and the rest of East Jerusalem.  Because this is precisely how the first and second Intifadas began (by Israeli provocation and Palestinian uproar in response), many in and outside Israel have been deeply concerned about the situation.

The UN Security Council approved a mild statement of concern which the U.S. delegation did not object to during an SC session.  It read:

“The members of the Security Council expressed their concern at the current tense situation in the occupied Palestinian territories, including east Jerusalem,” [Security Council president] Issoze-Ngondet said.

“They urged all sides to show restraint and avoid provocative acts,” he said after a closed-door meeting. “They stressed that peaceful dialogue was the only way forward and looked forward to an early resumption of negotiations.”

When a Palestinian leader claimed that the U.S. in the statement was calling for Israel to avoid further provocations, the U.S. delegation panicked and immediately disowned it.  Apparently our policy is so tied to Israel’s apron strings that we daren’t be perceived as in any way shape or form criticizing Israel, even when such criticism is more than justified as in this case.

So I ask: does this mean that the U.S. is not concerned with the current tense situation and doesn’t urge all side to show restraint?  That we don’t believe peaceful dialogue is the only way forward?  I’m well on my way to entirely giving up on the Obama Middle East policy.  This is just another nail in the coffin.

I note a report in a Middle East newspaper that George Mitchell has already submitted his resignation to Pres. Obama out of the former’s own frustration and that the president rejected it.  I haven’t seen anything further on this in the media so it’s possible it was not accurate.  But it’s instructive.  Steve Walt has already called for Mitchell to resign.  Obama needs to good swift kick in the ass and that would give it to him.  Why preside over a meaningless, meandering policy going nowhere fast?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Israeli Deputy PM Calls for Commission of Inquiry on Gaza

Wednesday, October 21st, 2009

When I first read the headline for this story, Deputy PM: Israel needs internal probe of Gaza war, I was pleasantly shocked: imagine, a senior Israeli official calling for the very investigation that Richard Goldstone and even Israeli human rights groups have been crying out for for months:

Deputy Prime Minister Dan Meridor thinks Israel should establish its own independent committee to investigate Israel Defense Forces activity in the Gaza Strip during last winter’s Operation Cast Lead.

But when I read deeper into the story it became clear that Meridor was not describing an independent commission of inquiry, but one whose goal from the outset would be to absolve Israel of culpability for the mayhem of that war.  Here are some of his further comments on the subject:

I have faith in the army and it is my duty to protect it, its commanders and its soldiers – and the most effective tool for this is serious self-examination,” Meridor said in a recent interview with Haaretz. “A state that examines itself [protects itself from] harassment. Today, with the development of international law, one of the best means of defense is for a state to investigate itself.”

…”The commission of inquiry that I hope will be established must examine the Goldstone report’s claims, even if it is a biased report, and its mandate from the outset was to examine Israel’s crimes, and one of the committee’s members stated prior to the investigation that Israel commits war crimes,” said Meridor, who also serves as minister of intelligence and atomic energy. “But the threat is serious and a commission of inquiry should be established, also to examine the suitability of the rules of war to the new type of war that has been imposed on us.”

In other words, one of the chief purposes of this Israeli investigation would be to justify the Gaza war as a supposedly “new type of war” that requires the relaxation of traditional international rules of war.  Supposedly, the type of threat posed by Hamas justifies the abandonment of the Geneva conventions because, gosh darnit, these terrorists just don’t fight fair and square.  They hide behind the skirts of their women and children instead of fighting like the manly men we are.

Meridor’s comments above aren’t those of a man who believes in the enterprise he’s supposedly proposing.  These are the words of a man who wants to create a sham commission of inquiry on his own government’s terms which will turn the current charges against Israel back on its opponents.  This is the type of typical wily manuveuring we’ve come to expect from Israeli governments seeking desperately to avoid blame or opprobrium on the world stage.  I don’t think it will work this time though.  If Israel’s inquiry (if one ever happens) doesn’t find some measure of fault or culpability for someone for Israel’s Gaza war strategy, then the investigation will satisfy no one but the Likudist government and its supporters.

On the Palestinian track, Meridor was full of double-talk:

Meridor said the Netanyahu government was determined to reach a final-status agreement with the Palestinians, but added, “This doesn’t mean that an agreement is possible.”

My God, of course Bibi is dedicated body and soul to a final status agreement.  It’s those pesky Palis who stand in the way.  If the U.S. and the world has any problems they should address themselves to them and not us, because it’s not our fault.

This passage also raised my eyebrows:

The government will not agree to former prime minister Ehud Olmert’s proposal to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, said Meridor, because Netanyahu is not willing to cede sovereignty over Jerusalem’s Old City or grant the right of return, and is also opposed to a territorial exchange.

What will a final status agreement be if not a “territorial exchange?”  And if you reject it before even beginning negotiations then in effect you’ve destined the talks to fail.  If I read this correctly, it seems that Meridor is saying that Israel intends to keep the major settlements blocs, but not to compensate the Palestinians with Israeli land in exchange as previous proposals have stipulated.  If so, that’s definitely a winning formula.  Keep the Palestinian land you’ve stolen from them and on top of that not offer even inferior Israeli land in the Negev in exchange.  This is really a new low in chutzpah, but certainly shouldn’t surprise us coming from this government.

If the IDF is “the most moral army in the world,” then certainly this government is the most forthcoming in the world.

Human Rights Watch Criticizes U.S. for Torpedoing Goldstone Report

Saturday, October 3rd, 2009
Justice Goldstone visiting damaged Gaza home (Reuters)

Justice Goldstone visiting damaged Gaza home (Reuters)

Yesterday, after the U.S. exerted enormous pressure on the Palestinians to withdraw their complaint against Israel before the UN Human Rights Council regarding possible war crimes during the Gaza war, the latter acceded.  The cruel irony of the following conflicting statements shouldn’t be lost on anyone:

Mr. Khraishi, the Palestinian ambassador, said that…a delay gives the Israelis and Palestinians time to take up another recommendation in the report: that both sides set up independent investigation panels to look into possible war crimes.

–New York Times, Palestinians Halt Push on War Report

**************

Israel’s record of conducting investigations into the conduct of its military forces has been extremely poor. The Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem documented 773 cases where Israeli forces killed civilians not involved in hostilities during the December-January conflict in Gaza, but found that Israel has to date convicted only one soldier of a crime – for stealing a credit card.

–Human Rights Watch, UN: US Block on Goldstone Report Must Not Defer Justice

As I wrote yesterday, why would anyone believe Israel is capable or willing to investigate itself?  It’s every action shows clearly that it sees nothing wrong with anything done by its soldiers in Gaza.  In fact, any soldiers who may’ve killed civilians or committed what outsiders would consider war crimes were, in fact, following explicit IDF orders to give no quarter to militants or civilians.  When you haven’t done anything wrong in your own mind, how can you take remotely seriously any claim that you have?

The same holds true for Hamas.  But I maintain that if Israel DID conduct an independent investigation it would force Hamas to do the same.

Why might the Palestinians have caved?  Bibi Netanyahu used Israeli blackmail, threatening a $700 telecom deal that would provide a second cell phone provider for the West Bank, unless the PA withdrew from the Goldstone deliberations.

Bibi also threatened the entire peace process saying Israel couldn’t possibly negotiate peace under threat of a war crimes investigation.  Curiously, the U.S. justification for its demand to end the proceedings also involved a claim that it would damage the peace process.  It is yet another cruel irony that nation states use such specious Macchiavellian logic to justify the a failure to pursue justice in the face of massive violations of international law.

Yesterday, I heard Jessica Montell of B’Tselem and Fred Abrahams of Human Rights Watch talk for 90 minutes about the importance of the Goldstone Report.  One of them made the very important point that allowing impunity to flourish by deferring justice has never worked as a means of resolving international conflict.  Ultimately, there can be no end to conflict till justice is seen to be done by both sides.  The U.S. has just deferred and defamed justice.

Barack Obama must be supremely confident that he can make peace between the parties and thus render the Goldstone Report moot.  I’m not so sure especially after is questionable decisions of the past week or so.  And if he fails and there is another Gaza war without the Goldstone Report having been considered, then Israel will exploit this as carte blache to repeat its brutish prosecution of a massive war against Palestinians civilians.

There is a very great likelihood of another Gaza war.  If there is, and Israel behaves the same way it did last January, the U.S. will carry all the blame on its shoulders.

HRW released a strong critical statement today about the suspension of deliberations over the Goldstone Report:

“The failure of the US and European states to endorse the Goldstone report sent a terrible message that serious laws-of-war violations by allied states would be tolerated,” Whitson said.

…“Prime Minister Netanyahu’s rejection of the Goldstone report because it would derail the peace process sadly impugns the importance of justice in reaching peace,” said Whitson. “Persistent impunity, not justice, is the greater threat to peace.”

Don’t let the Goldstone Report die.

Bronner’s Mischaracterization of Hamas Continues

Saturday, September 5th, 2009
Ethan Bronner gets it wrong on Hamas

Ethan Bronner gets it wrong on Hamas (Center for Study of Ethics, Utah Valley University)

Not an article Ethan Bronner writes goes by without the obligatory claim that Hamas is dedicated to Israel’s destruction.  Today’s story about the tension in Gaza between Islamizers and moderates within the Islamist movement is true to form:

It [Hamas] rejects Israel’s right to exist and remains doctrinally committed to its destruction. However, its leaders have said several times that if Israel were to leave all land taken in the 1967 war, Hamas could accept a Palestinian state limited to the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem…

If Hamas would accept a Palestinian state consisting of the current Occupied Territories, then ipso facto it does not reject Israel’s existence nor can it be committed to its destruction.  In fact, many Israeli political, military and intelligence analysts concede that Hamas’ acceptance of a hudna is a tacit acceptance of Israel’s existence.

In fact, no senior leader of Hamas for several years has put forward the incrementalist notion that it may accept a hudna as a creeping process leading to Israel’s destruction and absorption into Palestine.  Are there Palestinians who wish this outcome?  Certainly, just as there are many Israeli Jews who wish Israeli Palestinian Arabs could be expelled from Israel.  But the notion that Israel’s Arab citizens will be transferred out of the country is as far-fetched as the notion that Hamas will or can cause Israel’s destruction.

It’s long past time for Bronner to get with the program and acknowledge the myriad interviews of senior Hamas officials like Khaled Meshaal and others who have documented the moderating of the movement’s positions on these matters.  Let’s put it plain and simple for him: Hamas currently does not reject Israel’s right to exist nor is it committed to its destruction (and for those of you out there who are anti-Palestinian partisans clamoring to bring up the Hamas charter, please point me to any evidence that any Hamas leader pays any attention whatsoever to it).  The fact that Bronner stays stuck in the past is yet another proof that his reporting is neither careful nor balanced.

Yet another proof of this is a recent profile he wrote about the weekly Bilin demonstrations at the Separation Wall.  He interviewed IDF officers and peace activists about their respective views of both the Wall and the demonstrations.  But curiously, he noted the IDF claim that 170 soldiers had been wounded over time there (part of the claim that the demonstrators are not non-violent peace activists, but violent hoodlums).  But Bronner somehow forgot to mention the Palestinian casualties at the Wall, which include one murdered Palestinian and one American left in a vegetative state by IDF fire in the past four months alone.  Altogether, 19 Palestinians have been killed during demonstrations against the Wall.  Why wasn’t this fact even whispered in Bronner’s article?  Because he wanted his readers to focus on the flesh wounds suffered by Israeli soldiers when a few odd rocks are thrown their way by young Palestinians who violate the discipline invoked during these protests?  Why did Ethan Bronner forget Palestinian suffering?

Israeli Soldier Kidnapped

Thursday, August 13th, 2009

UPDATE: The Jerusalem Post is claiming that all IDF soldiers have been accounted for and the kidnapping apparently was a false alarm.  Thanks to reader Nathan for bringing this to my attention.

An astonishing development in Israel: the IDF has announced and a Palestinian militant group confirmed that it abducted an Israeli soldier in the center of Israel.  Though the police have thrown up roadblocks throughout the area, given the announcement from the abductors that they’d completed the operation, it seems likely they have made their escape.  It goes without saying that this new development complicates everything.  It complicates the negotiations for Gilad Shalit’s freedom (the other abducted IDF soldier held by Hamas).  It complicates U.S. attempts for a settlement freeze.  Whenever Israel’s security is threatened, Israelis retreat into a security shell and are unwilling to entertain the idea of flexibility in any form.

This kidnapping is unlike the previous Shalit event because the latter was captured while on duty on the Israeli border with Gaza.  This one occured within Israel proper and means that the kidnappers infiltrated the country and procured a car.  All this would entail a fairly extensive operation involving a number of co-conspirators.  This will shock Israel and rattle the nerves of the entire country.  The Shin Bet will be on the carpet for this major breach of national security.  Policitians will outdo themselves in nationalist bellicosity.  There will be calls for retaliation and worse.  It will get ugly.

Almost no one in Israel will face the nasty truth that the status quo is not viable.  That there will always be horrible events like this unless there is real peace with real negotiations and real compromises in which each side gives up something it doesn’t want to give up.  Israelis naturally prefer to be lulled by things as they are.  They don’t like to contemplate giving up anything for the sake of an unknown.  It seems almost an impossibility to convince them otherwise in the midst of such trauma.  How do you ask a human being to look past the current woe to see that the only way to avoid future woe is by stepping into the unknown; and that the unknown is better than the known because the former will only lead to more such trauma?