Muslim and Jewish Women in Nazareth

'We can live in peace'...John Lennon (photo: Dafna Tal)

Mahzor

Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘palestinian-civil-war’

Anthony Cordesman: Can Hamas Be Contained?

Thursday, June 21st, 2007

Anthony Cordesman, in a revealing NY Times interview with Bernard Gwertzman, paints a sobering picture of what a truly militant Hamas might do if it felt cornered by IDF onslaught and shut out of power by Abbas’ Fatah forces:

Now who’s going to be backing the Hamas force? Iran? There don’t seem to be Arab states around that are likely to back Hamas.

We need to wait and see what Hamas does—whether it tries to adopt a more moderate cover—but this is already a game where Syria, Iran, and Hezbollah in Lebanon have played a significant role. There is a vast flood of private capital in the Arab world, much of it in the hands of people who are not under the control of their governments. Money laundering activities that have somewhat tightened the flow of money in the Gulf have not affected what are massive deposits, perhaps half a trillion dollars—a lot of which is in private banks or in Asia or in Islamic banks in Asia.

There’s never a dull moment in this part of the world, is there?

There is the possibility of Iranian support and cadres infiltrating into Gaza; you have questions about what Hezbollah is going to do. It impacts in general on what al-Qaeda and Islamist movements elsewhere are going to do. If you look at the possibility of these interactions, none of them seems likely to move toward major wars, but this is part of a regional rise in instability, which extends from Pakistan into Algeria. It is very, very difficult to predict how much it will escalate and what the interactions will be.

It reminds me of the image of the Dutchman with his finger in the dyke who doesn’t seem to have enough fingers to stop the flow. No matter how hard the U.S. and Israel try to staunch the ‘flow’ of Hamas’ ideas and popularity, they can’t seem to do anything right. Will their latest maneuvers lead to a further radicalization of Hamas making it an even more dangerous troublemaker than it already is? Given the Bush Administration’s record of unifying splintered Islamist movements in the Middle East and strengthening their will to lethality, the outlook isn’t good.

Palestinian Civil War: The Dissolution of Hope

Friday, June 15th, 2007

“This is as close they can come to taking a sow’s ear and trying to turn it into a silk purse,” said Martin S. Indyk, former American ambassador to Israel and director of the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution…

New York Times

…”The dissolution of the Palestinian government is a singular moment that will allow the United States and its allies to create a “new model of engagement.”

–’Senior Administration official’ quoted in Washington Post

Martin Indyk and the Bush White House can try to spin this as much as they like, but Hamas’ victory in the Palestinian civil war is momentous, it is catastrophic, and it irredeemable. It is laughable to say that the world will abandon Gaza to Hamas, allowing it to stew in its own juices, while showering its largess on Mahmoud Abbas, Fatah and the West Bank. The West Bank is no laboratory for Palestinian democracy. It is no panacea to solve anything related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The West Bank is a truncated Palestine.

What good does it do to have two entites claiming to be the “real Palestine?” Two governments. Two peoples. They don’t share half of anything. Half of nothing is still nothing.

It is laughable too for Israel to talk of bolstering Abbas. What will they do, what can they do that will truly bolster him? Can they negotiate the creation of a Palestinian state and end the Occupation? Of course they can, but they won’t. Besides, in these circumstances if Israel left the West Bank there would be further chaos and Hamas would be emboldened to foment unrest there as well till it toppled Fatah. Given Fatah’s ineptitude, this process wouldn’t take long. No, I’m afraid this is the Talmudic equivalent of mekah taoot, shoddy merchandise Israel cannot return. It’s the equivalent of Colin Powell’s alleged Pottery Barn rule regarding the U.S. invasion of Iraq: you break it and its yours. Israel has done nothing to prevent Palestine from breaking and now it has. It has no one to blame but itself.

We can spend hours allotting blame to the Palestinians who brought this disaster on themselves with Hamas, as civil war instigator, the primary offender; though Fatah comes in a close second with its extravagant dysfunctionality and pervasive corruption. But the real culprits who had a chance and muffed it yet again are Israel and the U.S. As Aaron David Miller so aptly points out:

“The solution to all this was back in 2005,” said Aaron David Miller, a scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and a former adviser on Arab-Israeli relations at the State Department. “In 2005, Arafat was gone, Abbas had been freely and fairly elected, but we weren’t prepared to empower him. How are we going to take advantage of the opportunities that don’t exist now in 2007 when we wouldn’t take advantage of the opportunities when they existed in 2005?”

There is joy in the hearts of certain Israeli military intelligence analysts these days as they watch the disaster unfolding in Palestine. For they know that a Palestine in chaos is not one with which Israel will be compelled to negotiate. Thus putting off even farther into the future the inevitable Israeli territorial compromise which will finally resolve the conflict. My esteemed friend, M.J. Rosenberg puts it quite well when he writes:

The name of their [right-wing Israelis] game was, is, and always will be making sure that Israel has “no partner” with whom to negotiate. Their worst fear is of Palestinians like Mahmoud Abbas who is a credible negotiating partner. They were undoubtedly relieved to hear that, as Roni Shaked reported in today’s Yediot, “the Prime Minister’s advisers [declared] the Palestinian Authority dead, [saying] there is no one to talk to… and that the Bush administration will not put pressure on Olmert at this stage to come up with ideas for renewing the negotiations with Abbas and promoting a diplomatic horizon.”

I understand that this is a difficult point to assimilate. But the fact is that Israeli (and American) right-wingers are rooting for the Palestinian extremists. And that is why, today, with Hamas fully in control of Gaza, they are as happy as Red Sox fans when the team is eleven games up on the Yankees on Labor Day.

But those Israelis secretly or openly rejoicing ought to think twice. There should be no joy in Mudville tonight. For a Gaza controlled by Hamas is a territory controlled by Islamists. And there is much mischief that can come to Israel from this. Until now, the Likud right had been one of the few voices trumpeting the danger of the Talibanization of Palestine. Now, we have a potentially real specter of jihadist around the world flocking to Gaza and the New, New Thing for radical Muslims. Does Israel believe they can control this genie and somehow get it back in its bottle once it has been loosed on Gaza?

No, I’m afraid not. Before there was some hope that Hamas might moderate its positions and become a truly political force, thereby allowing the world to recognize it and Palestinian democracy. Now, Hamas will feel no pressure whatsoever to moderate itself. This is a return to square one. All bets are off. Much as I despise Dore Gold’s world view as expressed in his execrable new book, The Fight for Jerusalem, it is very possible that Gaza will now become Israel’s worst nightmare. A truly failed state like Afghanistan or Somalia from which terror is loosed on the world.

In Israel, Ehud Barak became defense minister, appointed by a failed prime minister and taking over from his failed predecessor, Amir Peretz. The talk is of war. Here is Itzik Sporta of the Israeli progressive blog, HaOkets (translated by Sol Salbe):

Peace seems to be even further away than it ever was. Thus Barak gets chosen because he promised he could run a war better than anyone else. He…boasts of his ability to renew Israel’s deterrence and dictating power. He does not promise, God forbid, reaching an accommodation with the Palestinians. Instead he raises the hope of a well-conducted war. I never realised that are our situation has degenerated to the point that our only remaining hope is to live by the sword — but efficiently.”

This is a vision of Israel as Sparta forever fighting wars, never enjoying peace. It is a bankrupt policy and vision. Feed the maw of Death Israelis and Palestinians for there is surely much of it in store.

If I recall correctly, Jesse Jackson gave his famous speech before the 1984 Democratic National Convention in which he chanted memorably and in incantatory style: “Keep hope alive, Keep hope alive, Keep hope alive.” Well, as far as Gaza is concerned, hope is dead.

Gaza=Somalia?

Wednesday, May 16th, 2007

Daniel Levy writes with extreme lucidity about the current disaster unfolding in Gaza. Many may see the current fighting as more of the same from a Palestinian society that seems to eat its young on a daily basis. But I assure you that what is happening now is a new and even more frightening development in the downward spiral of Palestinian society to civil war.

And the worst thing about this is it didn’t have to be this way. If Israel and the U.S. had adopted a softer line after Hamas won the last legislative elections and hadn’t imposed a highly punitive economic strangulation of Gaza; if the world community hadn’t gone along with this ill-conceived “strategy” to topple the duly elected Palestinian government; if the U.S. had embraced the Palestinian unity government brokered by the Saudis; if Israel had immediately embraced the Saudi-sponsored Arab League initiative instead of dickering over the Right of Return–then things needn’t have come to this pass.

All this proves is that if you drive a nation to the brink you mustn’t be surprised at the chaos and anarchy you unleash. Think of what happened to Germany as a result of the financially punitive peace settlement imposed on it after World War I. France was so eager to extract its pound of flesh from Germany that it never stopped to realize that if it drove German society to the economic brink, a monster like Hitler and National Socialism might be the result. If the Allies hadn’t been so deadset on punishing Germany, then the Weimar Republic might have actually had a chance of creating a stable, democratic Germany that could withstand the siren call of fascism.

Gaza is now in the depths of an economic crisis that may be justifiably compared to the economic Depression that de-stabilized and ultimately helped topple the Weimar Republic. We have to ask ourselves: are we prepared to stand on ceremony and continue to insist that Hamas and the national unity government have to do back flips before we recognize and talk to them. Or are we prepared to put out the fire that rages out of control in Gaza while Nero is fiddling in Jerusalem and Washington?

Let me be perfectly clear: the Gaza reoccupation that Israel is contemplating is an utter disaster in the making. The mission will be to come in on the side of Fatah and put down the burgeoning Hamas rebellion:

Does Israel want to play the role of Ethiopia in Gaza, re-crowning Fatah leaders atop IDF tanks?

The allusion to Somalia is quite apt. Just as neither the U.S. in 1993 or Ethiopia now can stabilize that failed state by brute force, Israel’s takeover of Gaza will only delay the inevitable. Fatah has trashed its legacy as steward of Palestinian national identity. It is bankrupt–kaput. Hamas is currently wiping the floor with it.

No one is claiming that Hamas is a desirable interlocutor. But what is the alternative? If we shut out Hamas as the Algerian army tried to do after Islamists won a decisive election victory there, are we prepared to reap the whirlwind? Are we prepared to face the Gaza version of Al Qaeda?

If Hamas is kicked out of the government, the alternative is unlikely to be…tame Hamas quiescence, but rather the emergence of an al Qaeda foothold inside the Palestinian territories.

End punitive economic sanctions which are strangling Gaza. Reopen the Gaza border crossings. Allow transportation links between Gaza and the West Bank. Recognize the national unity government. Begin immediate talks with the Arab League with a view to embracing the Saudi peace initiative. Begin final status talks with the Palestinians. Do this and Gaza has a chance. Don’t do this and civil war will come as sure as I’m writing this:

Israel and her international allies have to swallow hard and recognize that the route to possible enhanced security and a renewed peace process runs via a Palestinian unity government and the ongoing incorporation of the political Islamists into the governing equation.

…Europeans and others should be encouraged to engage; and their money, together with promised Arab donations, and Palestinian tax money being withheld by Israel should all flow back to the PA.

…A serious effort must be made to get a unity government to work. The policy of regime change in Palestine, as elsewhere, has failed.

Levy talks sense. Is anyone listening in Washington or Jerusalem??