Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘noam-chomsky’

TSA Screwing Up Airport Security? Turn to Israel (NOT)

Wednesday, November 24th, 2010
welcome to israel

Welcome to Israel...unless you're Arab, Black, or carry the wrong slogans on your laptop

Why can’t the U.S. be more like Israel?

I’d like to do a forensic search to root out the origin of the latest media meme that, given the mess that TSA appears to be making of the new full body airport security screenings, we should turn to Israel as a model for how to do the job.  Chances are that we’ll discover that the meme was created by someone in the MFA or by an Israeli security consultant who stands to make millions if TSA takes the idea seriously enough to hire him.

Everyone from CNN to Reuters, to the august N.Y. Times has taken up the idea:

Amid the uproar that airport screening has become too intrusive, some Americans are now asking why the United States cannot do it like the Israelis.

Representative John L. Mica, Republican of Florida and a critic of the Obama administration’s new screening methods, says the Transportation Security Administration should look at Israel, which uses early detection techniques at airports. An editorial in The Washington Times last week praised El Al, the Israeli national airline, as employing the “smarter approach” of using “sophisticated intelligence analysis which allows them to predict which travelers constitute a possible threat and which do not.”

As it turns out, the security methods employed by Israel’s famous [!] Shin Bet security service at Ben-Gurion International Airport in Tel Aviv are frequently stricter and more intrusive than the full-body scanners and pat-downs American officials put into place Nov. 1

Before we drive a stake right through the heart of this stupid idea let’s understand what it entails.  The idea is that the philosophy of U.S. security is to find weapons or bombs before they get on the plane.  Israel’s system, or so goes the claim, is keyed to identify terrorists, not find their weapons.

There is a wee small problem with the characterization of Israel’s system.  It’s a sack of bull.  The claim is that the Israeli system is based on a complex set of psychological criteria, questioning and variables administered by a highly trained and skilled set of professional security experts who will suss out the terrorists from the average Joes.  Here’s what the Israeli system is based on: an ill-defined set of prejudices including criteria like skin color, ethnicity, name, stickers on your laptop, etc.  If you are not white, not Israeli, not Jewish you are in for a very hard time.  If you are black or Arab or have an Arab name fughgedaboudit.  Or as the saying used to go: “If you’re black, get back.”

Why can’t the U.S. be more like Israel?  Oh, I don’t know, maybe because we’re a democracy and take civil liberties seriously and Israel winks and nods at the notion.  Maybe because we know enough about racial and ethnic profiling to reject the notion especially when you establish it at the core of a nation’s airline screening process.  Maybe because we have a more balanced, nuanced understanding of the conflicting requirements of national security and individual liberty.

Here is a short summary of the posts I’ve written extolling the professionalism of Israeli airport security.  There was the case of the Alvin Ailey American African American dancer separated from her company due to her skin color.  The U.S. university president and former cabinet officer of Lebanese descent (yup, her name gave her away as an Arab terrorist) traveling to Israel to speak against BDS; the Hebrew University professor on her way to an academic conference until forced to part with her laptop.  Or the award-winning Israeli-Palestinian documentary filmmaker forced to strip naked by El Al security apparently because her award, bestowed by no less a personage than George Clooney, made her a terrorism suspect.  The American university professor on her way to an Israeli academic conference until called a terrorist by El Al security (she was likely confused with another person with the same name, who wrote in her online bio that as a child she lived in poor Pakistani and Iranian villages); or how about the daughter of the Israeli Supreme Court justice who herself was an Israel foreign ministry trainee harassed at the airport while being Arab; or the case of the American family refused exit from Israel for no more reason than that they didn’t have proper papers acknowledging they were Palestinian, when none of the detained children or mother were Palestinian (the father, who was not with them when detained was Palestinian);  Not to mention the individuals prevented from entering Israel for no security reason whatsoever aside from their undesirable political views opposing the Israeli Occupation.  Then there was the woman who had had a “dangerous” slogan stickered on her laptop, which earned it three bullets through the hard-drive.  And oh man, if you’re a Harvard Law student doing academic research on land disputes between the Bedouin and Israeli government, don’t even think about it.  And finally, we have the case of El Al security in South Africa demanding to search a dark-skinned airport visitor who wasn’t even flying.

Max Blumenthal once told me that on his last visit to Israel one of the questions the screener asked was which Hebrew school he attended.  I tell you, that’s the true scientific basis of Israeli airport screening!  Max also just asked how I’d imagine the Israelis would treat Barack Obama if they had their druthers.  Sample dialogue:

Shabak screener: What kind of name is Barack?

Obama: I believe it’s related to the same name as your defense minister, Ehud Barak.

Q: What about your middle name Hussein?  Are you Muslim?

A: No, I’m Christian actually.  But my father was a Kenyan Muslim.

Q: Did you say Muslim?  Can you step aside Mr. Obama?  We’ll be moving you to the Arab line.  You can expect to be shipped back to whereever you came from in, oh, about 9 hours.  Enjoy your stay in Israel (or at least an Israeli holding cell).

Here is a former Shin Bet security officer describing Israeli screening procedures:

“What we are trained [for] is to look for the immediate threat - the Muslim guy.

…“The crazy thing is that we are profiling people racially, ethnically and even on religious grounds … This is what we do.”

Periodically, after a few too many of these incidents garnering bad publicity, an Israeli official makes a big show of reforming the system so that no one will be singled out for prejudicial treatment.  But you remember the old Who song: “Here’s to the new boss, just like the old boss.”

So, please, the next time you read any more of this crap in the MSM tell them about these incidents and ask whether this is the system we want in the U.S.  Would we prefer some inconvenience and full body scans or outright ethnic profiling passing for sophisticated airport screening techniques?  If Israel wants good press I’m afraid it’s going to have to earn it.  And this isn’t the way.

Thankfully, this Washington Post writers hasn’t drunk the Kool-Aid.

Chomsky to Deliver Bir Zeit Lecture on Al Jazeera

Tuesday, May 18th, 2010

Well, maybe this will teach the petty bureaucrats at the Israeli Interior Ministry a lesson.  After lecturing him for four hours on the errors of his ways in criticizing Israel and telling him what he could or should do to be allowed admittance, they sent Prof. Noam Chomsky packing back to Amman.  Later, Israeli PR flacks attempted to backtrack by lying and claiming it was all a clerical error by a desk jockey the Allenby Bridge.  Still later, they offered to allow him back into the West Bank (which isn’t Israel last I checked, even by Israel’s standards, so why should they even be determining who enters Palestinian territory?).  When Chomsky inquired about whether this was a bona fide official guarantee of entry he discovered it wasn’t.  Israel is just playing games.

But Chomsky, not to be played the fool, has delightfully one-upped them all.  He’s going to deliver his Bir Zeit lecture via video conference from Amman and it will be telecast live on Al Jazeera.  That way it will reach an audience thousands of times larger than the original lecture would have.  Since Al Jazeera is available in Israel, perhaps even Israeli citizens will be able to watch him take apart the hypocrisy and brustishness of Israeli policy and Occupation.

This is the problem with Israeli policy and with all authoritarian regimes (which the Occupation certainly is).  It thinks of the short term benefit, not the long term.  It thinks of tactics instead of strategies.  It puts a finger in the dyke but does nothing to preserve the ecosystem itself.

On a related note, Haaretz columnist Brad Burston has written a typically eloquent, soul-searching cri de coeur about the ugly rise of fascism inside Israel.  Lest my right-wing readers jump on Burston as a typically left-wing commentator, this is simply untrue.  Burston made aliyah decades ago and joined Kibbutz Gezer, where I myself visited when I studied in Israel.  He has impeccable credentials as a liberal Zionist.  So for him to be writing so openly using such strong language should tell us that the canary is singing in the coal mine that is Israeli “democracy.”  Israel is a nation under threat.  Even perhaps a nation beginning to implode under our very eyes from the heap of self-contradictions under which it labors.

elvis costello

Elvis Costello withdraws from Israel concerts (James O'Mara)


I was delighted to read that Elvis Costello, a performer I admire greatly, has cancelled his Israel performances on his upcoming tour.  He wrote a remarkably sensitive, balanced account of his decision which acknowledges that the decision is morally conflicted but had to be made nevertheless:

It is after considerable contemplation that I have lately arrived at the decision that I must withdraw from the two performances scheduled in Israel on the 30th of June and the 1st of July.

One lives in hope that music is more than mere noise, filling up idle time, whether intending to elate or lament.

Then there are occasions when merely having your name added to a concert schedule may be interpreted as a political act that resonates more than anything that might be sung and it may be assumed that one has no mind for the suffering of the innocent.

…If these subjects are actually too grave and complex to be addressed in a concert, then it is also quite impossible to simply look the other way.

…I am not taking this decision lightly or so I may stand beneath any banner, nor is it one in which I imagine myself to possess any unique or eternal truth.

It is a matter of instinct and conscience.

…Sometimes a silence in music is better than adding to the static and so an end to it.

I cannot imagine receiving another invitation to perform in Israel, which is a matter of regret but I can imagine a better time when I would not be writing this.

With the hope for peace and understanding. Elvis Costello

Haaretz notes that Santana and Gil Scott Heron have also joined in the protest by cancelling their own performances.  I hope other performers will read Costello’s nuanced, humble and carefully articulated statement in full.  It gives them much to ponder.  I too want to make clear that I do not support such a decision as a means of harming Israelis, especially those who share a critique of Occupation.  This is a political act, not one of petty vindictiveness.  Of course, many Israelis will mistakenly take it as the latter.  This is not an act that ultimately seeks harm to Israel or God forbid, it’s destruction.  It is a moral statement that tells Israel that the rest of the world will no longer sit idly by.  That if Israel wishes to continue down this road, a price will be paid in isolation.  And that when Israel ends Occupation, then that price will be redeemed and Israel’s status will be restored.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Bibi on Barring Chomsky: ‘I Read it in the News Today, Oh Boy’

Tuesday, May 18th, 2010

Well, one thing we know…Bibi reads the papers (Bibiton-Yisrael HaYom at least): that’s apparently how he learns of major decisions made by his own Interior Ministry to bar one of the most distinguished linguists in the world from entering the West Bank to lecture at Bir Zeit University.  You wouldn’t think he’d hear it from his own minister, would you?

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Monday that he had learned of the decision not to allow Noam Chomsky to enter Israel from the press…

“We read about it in the paper,” Netanyahu said during a Knesset session…

This is a classic case of passing the buck as far down the line as you can go.  Was the decision to bar the enimnent Dr. Chomsky made my a senior official?  Hell no, Israel always allows junior officers manning a desk at the Allenby Bridge to make such judgments independently:

Mark Regev, a spokesman for Prime Minister Netanyahu said, “There is no change in our policy. The idea that Israel is preventing people from entering whose opinions are critical of the state is ludicrous; it is not happening. This was a mishap. A guy at the border overstepped his authority.”

Regev suggested that if Chomsky tried to enter Israel again, he would succeed.

I think Israel punished the 81 year old Chomsky enough interrogating him for 4 hours after he’d made the trek from Boston to Amman and thence to the Allenby Bridge.  Why would he want to be put through this nonsense again just to enable Israel to say it did the right thing (finally) by admitting him?

People who are writing about this incident are getting it wrong when they say Chomsky was denied entry to Israel.  He was denied entry to the West Bank, which is not Israel.  Israel should have no right to determine who enters Palestinian territory via the Allenby Bridge.  This should be controlled by the PA.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Israeli Interior Ministry Denies Chomsky West Bank Entry

Sunday, May 16th, 2010


Oops, it was all a big misunderstanding claims Eli Yishai’s Interior Ministry.  That’s what Al Jazeera claims the goons who denied Prof. Noam Chomsky entry into the West Bank at the Allenby crossing are now saying.  As Chomsky says in this interview, what could they have misunderstood?  Who he was?  Where he was going (to speak at Bir Zeit University)?

Here’s the government’s statement which should be read to see how bureaucracy functions so well in service of Occupation and its associated evils:

Sabine Haddad, a spokesperson for the Interior Ministry, confirmed to Haaretz that the officials at the border were from the ministry.

“Because he entered the Palestinian Authority territory only, his entry is the responsibility of the Office of the Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories at the Defense Ministry. There was a misunderstanding on our side, and the matter was not brought to the attention of the COGAT.”

Haddad told Haaretz that “the minute the COGAT says that they do not object, Chomsky’s entry would have been permitted.”

So what she’s saying is that her own ministry official made a mistake in not passing off Chomsky’s entry to the Defense Ministry. If entry via the Allenby Bridge is supposed to be handled by the Defense Ministry, why was it handled by the wrong Ministry? Are there two types of entries there that are handled differently depending on the individual? It simply doesn’t pass the smell test.

Israel Radio quotes an apparently conflicting statement from the Interior Ministry specifying that Chomsky must access the West Bank through Ben Gurion Airport. Reading between the lines, aside from petty harrassment, this seems to be another attempt by Israel to compel Chomsky to concede that Israel controls the West Bank. Undoubtedly, they viewed his attempt at entering via Jordan as a way to deny Israeli sovereignty over the territory.

Given the alternate statements it makes you wonder who’s running the show, or whether anyone’s running the show at the Ministry. Joe Biden probably wondered the same thing the day he was buffaloed by the Ramat Shlomo announcement.

On days like today when Omar Said’s detention has been extended along with a prohibition against consulting his attorney, I tear my hair because there is too much about which to write.  Too much injustice.  Too much repression.  Too much fear.  Too much stupidity.

When Professor Chomsky, one of the world’s most distinguished linguists and a fierce critic of Israeli Occupation and policy, presented himself at the Allenby Bridge, he was grilled for hours about his intentions.  The official interrogating him made clear that they were refusing him entry because of his hostile views and because he was only speaking at Bir Zeit, but not in Israel (which he has often done).  The latter is a laughable criticism.  If Chomsky had been on his way to lecture at Bir Zeit and an Israeli university then they would have had grounds to claim that his views couldn’t be espoused within Israel without harming the security interests of the State.  Damned if you do and damned if you don’t.

His interrogator consulted closely with his superiors in the Ministry.  So for Yishai’s minions to claim it was all a big misunderstanding is ludicrous.  They knew exactly what they were doing and did it.  It was about as much of a misunderstanding as Joe Biden’s snub at the hands of the same Ministry which had approved 1,600 new housing units in occupied East Jerusalem the day before he arrived in Israel.  All an accident, a big misunderstanding.  It’s almost like they’d put a shiv in between your ribs and watch you bleed to death all the while telling you it was all just a big misunderstanding.

Noam Sheizaf had one of the best summaries of the significance of this incident:

There is no arguing that Israel is now viewing certain ideas, not just actions, as existential threat, and is willing to make use of its powers in order to suppress them. It is important to understand this point: Some people think that the state made a stupid mistake today, when it chose to refuse Chomsky a visa. But that’s only true if you judge the affair in terms of actual security – then you conclude that making such a fuss over a speech in Ramallah by an aging linguistic that no one would even notice is pure madness. But if you are obsessed with the persecution of “dangerous ideas” and constantly searching for ideological menaces, then Chomsky is a threat. In this context, not allowing him to enter your country might be logical…but it is also scary is hell.

This comes on top of other nasty developments in the case of Omar Said and Ameer Makhoul.  Today, the Petah Tikvah kangaroo court extended Said’s remand for another six days, while Makhoul’s counsel announced that they would hereby cease participating in the legal charade that was his case since they had not been able to consult with him since his detention over two weeks ago. Adalah, the Israeli Palestinian NGO providing his legal representation said:

“Due to the utter lack of respect for due process, the representation of Ameer Makhoul in the detention hearings has become meaningless.”

What this proves is that there are at least two tiers of justice (possibly more).  One for Israelis involved in conventional legal cases and another for those involved in security cases.  Those caught up in the latter can expect minimal rights if any (cf. Anat Kamm).  And if you are a Palestinian Israeli citizen you can even those minimal rights to be truncated almost at will.

Neither Makhoul nor Said have seen any evidence against them.  They don’t know what they did that constituted espionage.  They haven’t seen the most elemental rights accorded to suspects in any case in a western democracy (unless you want to compare their treatment to enemy combatants at Guantanamo, but they aren’t even U.S. citizens and Makhoul and Said are).

As the headline of the Moderate Voice’s story (see link below) on this incident says, “Democracies do not fear ideas.”  I guess this one does, unless you want to argue that it isn’t a democracy, which Israel makes is easier and easier for its enemies to do.  Is this any way to run a democracy?  You bet it isn’t.

On dark days like today I can even laugh at the black humor in the title of a new Facebook group founded by one of the members of the Free Ameer Makhoul group I created: Together Toward Collective Suicide.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tanya Reinhart, Israeli Academic Activist Against Occupation, Dies

Sunday, March 18th, 2007


Haaretz brings the sad news of the death of long-time Israeli peace activist, Tanya Reinhart (note Haaretz misspells her last name below). She was a linguist and student of Noam Chomsky and shared his view of the Israeli-Arab conflict:

Reinhardt, one of the most outspoken representatives of the radical Israeli left…was a proponent of an academic boycott of Israeli universities to protest the occupation.

After receiving a master’s degree at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Reinhardt wrote her doctoral thesis at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology under renowned linguist Noam Chomsky.

Her contributions to linguistic theory dealt with the connection between meaning and context, and the interface between syntax and systems of sound.

From 1977, Reinhardt taught courses in linguistics and literature at Tel Aviv University, including classes in critical reading of media and the analysis of discourse based on Chomsky’s methods.

For the last 15 years she also taught at Utrecht University in the Netherlands.

In December 2006, Reinhardt left Israel and settled in New York to teach at New York University.

Reinhardt and those close to her said the change in the university’s relationship to her was made in response to her statements calling for an academic boycott of Israel.

Reinhardt espoused the principle of non-violent resistance, and was among the leaders of the left-wing activists who called for boycotts of the 1996 and 2001 elections.

She was active in recent years in Israeli-Palestinian efforts against the West Bank separation fence and the seizure of land from Palestinians for its construction.

Reinhart was an anti-Zionist and I’m fairly certain we wouldn’t have seen eye to eye on the conflict. But I salute her for her brave devotion to peace and ending the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Almost as much as her death itself. I am saddened that a group of despicable individuals who I’m sad to say share a religion with me wrote this about Reinhart’s death:

…We are certain you will all want to have just as much fun laughing about the wonderful demise of the Queen of Treason, Tanya Reinhardt. Could anything be funnier? Let’s all suggest ideas of what can now be done with her corpse and publish it as a knock off of those 101 things to do with a dead cat books. How about using her head to scare away crows?

We figure that hundreds of thousands of people will want to attend the first annual set of festivities celebrating the end of Reinhardt’s career of imbecility. We understand the scalpers are already charging 200 euro per ticket, even though people have to bring their own beer. So get with the spirit guys.

We plan to award the collected writings of David Irving…to whoever comes up with the best corpse disposal suggestion.

These moronic harassing e mails are periodically sent by either Rachel Neuwirth or those associated with her. This one was sent by someone calling themselves Treason Ferret at treason_ferret@hotmail.com (no doubt a fake address) from IP 128.241.46.59. How can someone call themselves Jewish and have such odious and hateful ideas about another Jew? If anyone has any technical expertise and thinks they might be able to help trace these messages to their origin I would appreciate contacting me. Sunlight is the best antidote to such ooze. I reserve the worst Jewish curse for whoever wrote this: may his or her memory be erased (y’mach shmo v’zichrono).

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE