Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘national-security’

Netanyahu’s Security Agents Disrobe Female Foreign Journalists

Thursday, July 21st, 2011

You know, here in the U.S. they often talk about how much certain presidents detested the press and how the press office had a confrontational or hostile relationship with journalists.  They’ve got nothing on Israel, where Prime Minister Netanyahu’s Shabak-appointed security detail routinely disrobes female journalists for doing little more than their jobs in covering his press events.  In fact, I wrote a post about this months ago and apparently nothing’s changed.

The Foreign Press Association…sent a sharp letter to the Prime Minister’s Office…complaining of multiple humiliating incidents, which the organization claims both impedes foreign reporters’ work, as well as erodes their professional standing.

The FPA denounced what it called “the continued harassment” of foreign reporters…adding that unless policies change, they may stop covering the PMO altogether…

“In the past two days, three female reporters in separate incidents were forced to undress, remove their bras and have them placed through an X-ray machine in front of a group of colleagues. In addition, pocketbooks were emptied in public, with personal items also put on display and X-rayed for everyone to see.

“This type of treatment is unnecessary, humiliating and counterproductive. After repeated appeals and promises by security officials it appears that the Prime Minister’s Office does not have the desire to stop this happening and so the FPA will begin consulting its members over whether the foreign media should no longer cover events at the PM’s Office, as this is the only occasion where this type of incident occurs,” the letter concluded.

What’s laughable is the prime minister’s press flack’s consternation: how could this sort of thing possibly happen?  We must stop this right now.  You have my word we will.  Either he’s playing that old kid’s trick of crossing his fingers behind his back as he promises, or he’s a very poor liar:

Government Press Office Director Oren Helman said that the incidents described in the letter were “disturbing and damaging to Israel’s image,” adding that “this was an embarrassing mishap, which we will try our best never to have happen again. We apologize for any anguish caused to the reporters. This is most certainly not our policy.”

Since taking office in September, Helman added, “The GPO has been taking a series of steps meant to improve the position of the foreign press in Israel. We are trying to implement that to the issue of security checks as well.”

Of course it’s YOUR policy.  Who’s policy is it, if not yours?  Unless you want to claim that the Shabak agents are acting independently of you.  But then again, if that’s so, then who’s the Shabak’s boss?  In my naiveté I thought Bibi was the boss and could command the security detail to perform according to his standards.  But I guess maybe the Shabak is Bibi’s boss in this matter at least, if not others.

This is yet another indication that Israel does not honor either the press or freedom of the press.  Journalists, especially the foreign press who are clearly up to no good and always trying to point out Israel faults (especially the Arab press), are a burden to be suffered.  That’s the only way Bibi’s goons could get away with this.  And the average Israeli could care less since they rarely read the foreign press except as refracted through an Israeli media source.

I’ve got one suggestion that could nip this problem in the bud.  Force the Shabak agents to shed their clothing and empty their pockets before they enter the event itself.  Out into the sunlight would come the girlie magazines, condoms, mash notes to their girl friends.  That would stop this nonsense cold.

Welcome, Israeli Justice Ministry, Weapon Industries

Wednesday, June 22nd, 2011

Just want to offer a shout out to new subscribers from the Israel Weapon Industries (Shlomi S.) and Israel’s Justice Ministry (Gil CS).  One can only wonder what they find so interesting here.  But hey, maybe they’ll learn something.  Of course one hopes it won’t be the identity of whistleblowers and sources who are actually protecting the Israeli government from some of its worst impulses.  That would be most unfortunate.

Along those lines, I note that the Justice Ministry is enlisting the public to create a posse to apprehend evildoers (like me, I presume, were I an Israeli citizen).  Here’s a part of the responsibilities of the Security and Special Projects unit of the Ministry:

Leaking of Sensitive Information

We turn to you [the public] to report to us when you come upon a leak of sensitive information or illegal publication, such as a document from our ministry or ruling that infringes on personal privacy, which are published in any of the following ways:

1. In the media

2. Internet: via forums, email, etc.

3. Documents that reached the wrong hands through fax or mail

4. Violations of information security through technological means

Hey, you don’t think the Justice Ministry would be trying to make a statement by having someone subscribe to the blog using their Justice Ministry e mail address, do you?  At any rate, like they do in TV shows profiling Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, now let’s all welcome Shlomi and Gil to the group: hi Shlomi, hi Gil!

Thanks to Dena Shunra for research assistance.

Bin Laden is Dead, Long Live Bin Laden

Sunday, May 1st, 2011

No, I haven’t become an Al Qaeda fan and I’m not drinking to the health of bin Laden’s successor.  My point is that killing one man, no matter how symbolic his life or death might be to world terrorism and the fight against it, won’t change much in the long run.  Undoubtedly, there is a new bin Laden pre-designated by his movement to take his place.  There may even be a set of pre-planned terror attacks prepared for just this eventuality as vengeance for the death of their leader.  While I’m no expert in Al Qaeda, bin Laden had to have been so isolated I don’t see how he could’ve been a key operational or even inspirational figure to Al Qaeda.  His death will likely not slow down or change much the radical Islamist agenda.

The root causes of this movement must be addressed to end its potency for a small cadre of the world’s Muslims.  The U.S. must leave Afghanistan and Iraq.  We must lead–or if not lead–get out of the way of an international campaign to pressure Israel to settle its conflict with the Palestinians.  We must get on the side of the Arab spring and stop supporting the potentates and Old Geezers of the autocracies.

I don’t think it’s that difficult ultimately for western nations like ours to get right with the Arab and Muslim world.  Despite the Al Qaeda anti-western mantra, there is no innate Arab/Muslim hate for the west.  But it is shedding the illusions that have led us to support the Shahs, Mubaraks, Salehs, and Abdullahs that seems to be difficult for our president at this time.  If we embrace the movement toward freedom exemplified by the martyrs of Daraa and Misurata, ultimately the bin Ladens will be consigned to the dustbin of history.

To do this, we will also have to recalibrate our relationship with Israel and our former knee-jerk support for its far-right governments.  There is little doubt that Barack Obama hates Bibi Netanyahu.  But disliking a leader is not the same as compelling him to do something you know he must do in order to bring peace to a region desperately crying out for it.  The truth is that while Obama may’ve achieved something that eluded two previous presidents, this is nothing compared to the heavy lifting he will have to do to truly undermine the attraction radical Islam holds for Al Qaeda and its admirers.

Recognize a Palestinian state come September in the UN General Assembly.  This will go farther than killing 10 bin Ladens in bringing credibility to the U.S. role in the Middle East.

I didn’t realize how much of a disconnect there is between my thinking about this and the general jubilation described in this passage:

The news touched off an extraordinary outpouring of emotion as crowds gathered outside the White House, in Times Square and at the Ground Zero site, waving American flags, cheering, shouting, laughing and chanting, “U.S.A., U.S.A.!” In New York City, crowds sang “The Star-Spangled Banner.”

The author of the NY Times article I quoted above then continues with yet another vast overstatement:

Bin Laden’s demise is a defining moment in the American-led fight against terrorism…

It certainly is not a defining moment.  It’s a moment that, in the long run, means very little.  It’s the equivalent of a small victory that is part of a very long, complicated campaign.  I can’t begin to say how wrong-hearded this attitude is.  What will they say after the next terror attack?  Of course they’ll say we have to kill more of ‘em.  That’s the answer.

It was always going to be tough to defeat Barack Obama in the 2012 election.  That just became that much harder.  And the current Republican field can’t give much succor to the country’s Republicans.  The names Tweedledee and Tweedledum were made for these bozos with the chief clown among them, Donald Trump (at whom Obama took some good whacks during the Correspondents Dinner yesterday night).  Security is always a weak point for Democrats.  Considering Obama got done what neither Clinton nor Bush could before him, his security cred is sky-high and he’ll be able to milk this during the campaign.  Keep in mind that I don’t think Obama’s policies in that part of the world are effective and drone attacks and assassinations are no substitute for having a real substantive policy of addressing the Muslim world.  But he has undoubtedly achieved a coup that eluded many before him.

Uri Blau: Revenge of the State

Sunday, March 27th, 2011
uri blau

Uri Blau focuses lens on the deterioration of Israeli democracy

Yet another nail in the coffin of Israeli democracy will be hammered by the nation’s attorney general, who announced that the State will prosecute one of Israel’s most distinguished investigative journalists, Uri Blau, for his reporting in Haaretz about the top-secret IDF documents leaked to him by Anat Kamm.  Never, as far as I know, has a journalist been charged with a crime for publishing such leaked documents.  There will be Israeli advocates who will attempt to use arguments of strict legalism saying Blau violated a law and therefore must be prosecuted, etc., etc.  But by the attorney general’s own admission this case is one of revenge against a reporter who’s gored the ox of the intelligence apparatus one too many times with his sharp, incisive and damaging reporting of stories of outrages perpetrated by the generals and intelligence agents.

In a startling admission apparently made with the approval of the attorney general, a senior government lawyer told a right-wing columnist why the government was pursuing Blau, but not Haaretz itself or it’s publisher, Amos Schocken:

“…I [Mati Golan] got a phone call from [deputy Attorney General] Raz Nezri. He said he was calling me because I’ve written before about the problematics of not having Haaretz and Shocken put on trial. Alongside the decision to try Blau, Nezri said, the Attorney General decided not to prosecute Haaretz. Why? Nezri confirmed “Haaretz acted inappropriately when it backed and sponsored Blau’s stay abroad”, but “we thought it was more correct to go for the precedent-setting move of prosecuting a journalist for retaining stolen documents, and not a move against Haaretz for obstruction of justice…

Uzi Benziman goes even farther in the online media criticism journal, 7th Eye:

The announcement [of Blau's prosecution] derives from [the State's] anger that he has insulted Shabak investigators because earlier in the case he agreed to return secret documents to the Shabak, but did not return all of them.  Shabak cannot stand lies.

Except its own.  It’s darkly ironic that Shabak take such umbrage at Blau’s impudence in lying to it when this agency lies both to detainees, lawyers and the public with equal impudence.  How does the Shabak or government make a serious claim regarding Blau’s ethical lapses when they violate such norms regularly?

I’ve written about Yuval Diskin’s public comments that Blau “stuck his finger in his agency’s eye and twisted it” when he not only published a top-secret IDF document, but a photograph of the document itself.  This effrontery the agency could not stomach.  Though he continued by claiming there was no motive of vengeance or settling scores, as Benziman notes, this is precisely what the attorney general’s prosecution reveals.

Can you imagine that there is an Israeli journalist who advocates that the publisher of a competitor be thrown in prison because he published a story based on top-secret IDF documents?  Israeli defense reporters do this virtually every day.  They are leaked top-secret documents and information that the generals WANT the public to know.  But when a reporter writes about such a document that IDF doesn’t want the public to know about, only then does it become a criminal offense.

Make no mistake, this is the criminalization of investigative reporting.  This is the State saying you may report what we wish you to report and nothing more.  It’s not quite there yet.  But I note the absolute cowing of the Israeli media in the face of the Dirar Abusisi story, which I offered almost a score of Israeli and foreign journalists before it broke widely.  To this day, there are major aspects of the case not yet reported within Israel.  Why?  Because journalists are patriots?  That’s what Yossi Melman once argued to me.  But I don’t buy it.  And even if it’s true, this means journalists are subordinating their obligation to their profession to their obligation to the State.  An unwelcome state of affairs in any so-called democracy.

Not to mention that very few Israeli journalists have come to Blau’s defense.  You’d think there would be thundering editorials in all but the most right-wing publications.  There are none.  You’d think columnists would rally to Blau’s defense.  With only rare exceptions, they haven’t.  Partly, this stems from jealousy at the audacity of Blau’s stories; partly it stems from a desire for self-preservation.  Only the protruding nail gets clobbered by the hammer.  Those journalists who keep their heads down and don’t threaten the established order or consensus will continue to have access to their cherished intelligence sources who dole out leaks to them at their pleasure.

One might easily argue that this is a case of legal double jeopardy since Blau has already signed a plea deal through which he returned all top-secret documents in his possession (not just those offered him by Kamm) in exchange for being allowed to come back to Israel and not be charged.  Now the State has changed its mind and thrown the plea deal out the window and decided to go full steam ahead with a prosecution that makes a mockery of due process and fair dealing, not to mention commits a grievous violation of press freedom.  It does so based, according to Dimi Reider, on the unsupported claim that Blau hasn’t returned ALL the documents in his possession.

Let us be clear, Uri Blau is no ordinary reporter and turning him into a convicted felon is no ordinary undertaking.  Blau has unearthed some of the most damaging stories involving generals, politicians and their feudal dynasties that were published in Israel in the past decade.  This would be the equivalent of the Justice Department trying Seymour Hersh for his reporting.  Many have likened him to Julian Assange in terms of his breathtaking access to whistleblowers inside the belly of the beast.  From the authorities point of view, if they can knock off Blau they will have struck a major blow for defanging the Israeli media.  While there are other good reporters in Israel, ones who are courageous and principled, Blau has been in a class by himself.  His downfall would be a tragedy of major proportions for Israeli democracy and the public’s right to know.

Benziman notes the critical importance of leaks to all democracies:

Israeli media serve their social purpose successfully only when journalists are able to obtain and publish leaks.  And such leaks sometimes take the form of secret documents.

This prosecution reveals once again the inadequacy of the Israeli political system in the absence of a constitution or Bill of Rights, which clearly define the obligations and rights of citizens under the law.

Israel Drops Sex Harrassment Charge Against Palestinian Researcher Who Fought Back During Intrusive Security Check

Friday, January 21st, 2011
israeli security guard assaults honida gaanam at ben gurion

Dr. Honida Gaanam, sexually demeaned during security check at Ben Gurion. Guilty of flying while Arab. (Tomer Applebaum)

18 months ago, Palestinian academic lecturer, Dr. Honida Gaanam, was trying to fly to France for an academic conference.  Her problem is that she was flying while Arab.  The Ben Gurion airport security guard began to search Ganaam’s bra invasively and the victim fought back by grabbing the guard’s bra and asking her whether she liked how it felt.  For this, the professor was charged with sexual assault (I kid you not).

Gaanam got herself a good lawyer from the Israeli Palestinian NGO Adallah and fought back.  The attorney argued that she suffered this degrading security check for one reason only,  she is Arab.  She and her lawyer told the government’s legal advisor that during her security check the contact became so degrading that it felt like a sexual attack on her and she could not suffer it in silence.  The academic later told security officials of her wish to file a complaint of sexual harrassment against the guard, but was told that the charge would be filed against her instead.

Though the government dismissed the criminal charges against her, it warned Ganaam that if she committed any illegal acts within a specified period it would renew these charges against her.

Authorities at Ben Gurion airport castigated Gaanam saying that she had ulterior motives in criticizing what is a necessary security procedure to ensure the safety of millions of air passengers.  Given the identical demeaning treatment meted out to Al Jazeera’s Israel correspondent last week during a security check before a foreign correspondents dinner with the prime minister, it would appear that the Shabak is training its female security personnel to deliberately degrade Palestinian women.  I suppose the IDF is doing such a good job of humiliating Palestinian men at checkpoints that the Shabak doesn’t want to be left too far behind in its treatment of women.

Bergman on Mossad’s ‘Stupidity, Arrogance’ in Devising Stuxnet

Friday, December 17th, 2010

Ronen Bergman has published a story in Friday’s Yediot Achronot on the Stuxnet worm, one of the few comprehensive reports to have appeared in the Israeli media which, as he notes, has studiously (and curiously) avoided an issue that has enflamed the world media.  Bergman’s reporting on this is very important since he is known to have excellent sources within the security apparatus, while generally maintaining a certain independence and integrity.  And he minces no words in stating baldly (through his sources) that Stuxnet has been a disaster both for the Mossad (he coyly refuses to explicitly name the agency as the source) and western intelligence agencies monitoring and containing Iran’s nuclear efforts.  What’s especially critical about this is that few journalists (except me and several others) until now have specified the price that Stuxnet will exact from both its maker and all intelligence agencies working on this issue.

After noting German security reports on the damage the malware caused to Iran, the reporter also notes:

Concurrently, it [Stuxnet] caused tremendous damage to he who created it [i.e. Israel].  There are those already calling it the “Al-Mabouh of [All] Worms…”

…There can be no doubt that the organization standing behind Stuxnet brought nearer, in a way that can never be undone, the ability to launch similar such attacks [by others] in the future.

Bergman notes an uproar among western intelligence agencies trading accusations and recriminations back and forth about who is the author of the worm:

German intelligence (the BND) warns that if the Mossad planted this unripened worm, it caused great damage to the efforts against Iran.

According to the intelligence correspondent, Stuxnet delayed Iran’s nuclear program by “a few months,” which seems an extraordinary expense to go to for such a small payoff.  Further, Bergman states:

One of the most expert sources on the subject says that the Stuxnet affair is the most central and important (to this point) in the “covert war” conducted by the west against Iran…Whoever [created the worm] did–either through stupidity or arrogance–enormous damage to this effort…While no one was killed or injured and there was no tragedy…we’re speaking about opportunities that are now foreclosed including other operations [that can never be successful given that Iran will now be on guard to protect its security].

In other words, the security weakness that Israel discovered and exploited could have been put to much more effective use.  If you’re going to go to the trouble, why not get a major result instead of a paltry few months delay?

Very pointedly in Bergman’s report you will find no criticism of Stuxnet from Israeli sources. As far as the political/intelligence apparatus it was a triumph that will ring out the career of outgoing Mossad chief, Meir Dagan.  It is a mark of the insularity of Israeli thinking that it pays no notice to the beating it is taking in the international arena for both the al-Mabouh killing and Stuxnet.  I look forward one day to an Israel that joins the nations of the world, is welcomed by them.  An Israel that refuses to engage in such dangerous adventurism.  A nation that is pragmatic and cautious in its dealings both with friends and enemies, but especially the latter.  That day will come.

Israeli Military Judge Attempts to Extort Machsom Watch for Alleged Personal Defamation

Friday, October 22nd, 2010

Despite the fact that I seem to collect many similar stories of Israeli democracy and justice gone awry, this story came close to leaving me at a loss for words.  One of the finest Israeli NGOs exposing the shocking inadequacy of Israeli military justice is Machsom Watch.  In fact, it was through a Machsom Watch report that I learned important details about the detention of Omar Said and Ameer Makhoul.  Their volunteers attend every possible hearing they can.  They act as a witness to prevent the worst miscarriages of Israeli justice or to watch the train wrecks as they unfold if you’re more of a pessimist.

the play's the thingHere is what the group’s legal observer wrote about one such hearing:

The detainee, who is forbidden contact with his attorney, is brought into the chamber.  The attorney then leaves the room.  The judge asks whether the detainee has anything he wishes to say.  He answers in the negative [and then departs]. We are left in the hall for the second half of the performance [or "play].

It seems that Israeli military judge Jordan Barak has taken deep personal offense to this characterization of his er, performance.  In fact, he was so degraded, humiliated and insulted that he wrote to Machsom Watch:

Calling the legal process I conducted a “performance,” is a defamation of the court and an insult against me as a military judge…which is liable to, nay will humilitate me in the eyes of others.  It is also liable to make me the object of hatred, ridicule and disgust, and thus shames me as a judge.  Therefore it damages my office, as military judge, which is a public position.  Therefore, I demand that you cease publication of such lashon ha-ra [a halachic form of personal "defamation"], apologize herewith for such damaging publication.  To properly ensure that I am not so damaged, I demand that you transfer to me 100,000 shekels [$25,000].

I’ve heard of judges doing wacky things before and I’m sure many have done worse, but in all the years I’ve followed justice in this country, Israel and elsewhere, I’ve never heard of a judge demanding personal damages for a single published word that was allegedly defamatory.  I’m not saying it doesn’t or hasn’t happened.  It’s just a phenomenon I find astonishing, not least that Barak intended the payment to go into his own pocket.

Barak apparently hasn’t heard of freedom of speech or the right of NGOs to defend such freedoms as they see fit regardless of how insulted judges may see it.  If I were Im Tirzu I would sign this guy up as a member.  In fact, Ronen Shoval is so litigious perhaps he might want to lend Barak the same attorney who threatened to sue Didi Remez for a couple a million shekels for besmirching its reputation.

To its credit Hagit Shlonsky, it spokesperson, responded firmly and unyieldingly to Barak’s letter:

The report was not meant as a personal attack on the judge, but rather on the process of justice itself being conducted as little better than a “performance.”  The actors sometimes change, but the roles and text always remain the same.  All the detainees are arrested on a suspicion of “endangering the security [of the state].  The actor playing the role of officer/investigator never details what is contained in the secret investigative file that rests on the table before the judge.  Occasionally, an attorney is even appointed for a detainee, but always forbidden from meeting with the client while investigations are underway.  The defense, playing its role in the performance, can ask the investigator questions.  The investigator answers every question with “the answers are found in the secret file.”  The judge concludes the proceeding by assigning the amount of days of detention or its conclusion, usually assigning fewer days than the officer has requested.

Barak, in responding to the questions of Haaretz’s Chaim Levinson, dug himself an even deeper hole.  The irony of course is totally lost on him:

I deal in very serious matters and try to conduct justice as well as possible, in the most objective way possible according to the proper standards, and to relate to all the accused as if they were in Israel [say what?].  I seek to relate to every one as he would be treated in any court in the world.  And then these women come and say the whole thing is a performance.  It hurts and pains me.

The IDF spokesperson released a patently self-evident falsehood saying that the matter had never come to its attention.

Gee, I don’t know what more that I can add to this parade of self-parody and self-delusion.  If I point out the levels of sheer ludicrousness in the judge’s statement won’t I be beating a dead horse?  Perhaps I should just let the thing speak for itself as they say in Latin.

H/t to reader, Dina Hecht.

Israeli Supreme Court Affirms Deportation of Nobel Peace Laureate, Maguire

Monday, October 4th, 2010
maguire stands before rachel corrie

Nobel Peace laureate Maguire stands before the MV Rachel Corrie before sailing for Gaza (AP)

In a ruling that should bring shock and disdain on Israeli jurisprudence throughout the world, the Supreme Court ruled that the intelligence services and Interior Ministry were right in excluding Nobel Peace laureate, Mairead Corrigan Macguire from Israel as punishment for her sailing on the Rachel Corrie in order to break the Gaza blockade.

In effect, Israel’s highest court has implicitly ratified the blockade as a legal act under Israeli law, a view contrary to international law.  It has also ratified the blatant security policy of excluding political undesirables merely because they criticize Israeli government policy.  Interestingly, a significant minority of Israeli society shares those same views, but because they are citizens the security services do not (yet) have the power to exclude them.

For those who enjoy debating my views, I should make clear that Israel and other countries have every right to exclude anyone they wish from their countries.  They usually don’t have to give rhyme or reason.  But in rejecting entry of some of the world’s most distinguished intellectuals, peace activists, and clowns from Macguire to Chomsky to Finkelstein to Ivan Prado, Israel betrays to the world its shrinking from democratic values, free debate, and political diversity (for God’s sake..afraid of a Spanish clown???).  In other words, the nation shows its true colors to the world and can no longer argue it is what most know it isn’t: a democratic society which values free speech for all.

Laughably, the court suggested that the authorities should have allowed Maguire to enter the country using a 48 hour visa to attend the conference she was planning to address.  In that case, I wish the Supreme Court judges who rendered this stupid ruling were instead lowly immigration officials so they could’ve acted sensibly in place of the stupid decision made to exclude her.

Also laughably, the court suggested that the proper route would’ve been for Maguire to protest her exclusion by the Interior Ministry before attempting to enter Israel.  Why should she honor an unjust and corrupt system by engaging in such a charade?  Everyone knows she would be denied, and once denied and after appealing her denial, she would still be rejected; and if she THEN attempted to enter Israel the court would STILL have ruled against her finding a different ground on which to do so.  Once again, I make the point that even Israeli highest court is loathe to second guess security decisions even those having no rhyme, reason or justification in democratic values or common sense.  It is, as Israel’s media have also pointed out, a rubber stamp for the security apparatus.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE