Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘national-security-state’

Channel 1 Correspondent Confirms Ilan as Shabak Director-Designate

Friday, October 22nd, 2010
mr x

Yitzhak Ilan, coming soon to a Shabak near you: watch this space for further details

Several weeks ago, I reported here that Bibi Netanyahu had settled upon a candidate to succeed Yuval Diskin as Shabak chief.  While Israeli news sources could and still cannot report his name (they call him “Y.”), I did: Yitzhak Ilan.  Today, Channel 1‘s military correspondents, Yoav Limor confirms that Bibi shortly will name Ilan to the job.

Ilan began his career fighting the Russian mob and then moved into dealing with what’s known in Hebrew as the “Arab sector.”   There are several things that are groundbreaking (for Israel) about the director-designate:  he will be the first non-Ashkenazi in the job.  Ilan is of Georgian descent.  He is the first director to rise through the ranks as an interrogator, to the top job.  Most previous directors ran Arab spies in the field.  Limor concluded his report by calling Ilan an “excellent chess-player.”

That remains to be seen.  Since Ilan will be taking on a significant role in the national security machinery, it’s worth quoting what I wrote about his checkered past:

Ilan, as then-director of the Jewish terror unit, was responsible for the [miserable failure of the] Jack Teitel investigation.  Teitel is the American Jewish terrorist implicated in multiple anti-Palestinian acts of violence and murders who engaged in his crime spree over a decade or more.  The final straw was the bomb Teitel exploded at the home of Hebrew University Prof. Zeev Sternhell, which wounded him.  The Shabak finally caught him tacking up flyers on a Jerusalem street which bragged about the bombing…

Ilan is a veteran of the Shabak who has filled many senior roles including chief of investigations and was thought, until the sex scandal, to be likely to retire form the service.

The question really is will anything be different?  Will Ilan merely pursue the same objectives with the same brutality as his predecessor?  The answer is likely to be Yes.  The only way the Shabak will transform itself is when the State it serves demands that it do so.  The State of Israel gets the secret police it demands.  And the Shabak and operatives like Ilan are only too happy to accommodate it.

I will shortly have access to an exclusive piece of graphic documentation concerning Ilan which I can’t yet share.

Israeli State War Against Ameer Makhoul

Monday, June 21st, 2010

Ameer Makhoul was scheduled to have his first court hearing today but it appears to have been delayed by at least a few days.  But I wanted to bring to my readers’ attention some wonderful resources which help tell Ameer’s story.  Nadia Hijab just recorded an interview with his wife, Janan which I enclose below (in slightly edited form):

Janan Abdu interview June 19, 2010

“I have lost both my parents in the past two weeks. My mother had been in a coma at the hospital since last November as a result of a severe asthma attack. My father was suffering from cancer and because of my mother’s illness he did not have the strength to fight it. You know how close our families are, and the emptiness she left during her coma was not easy.    My father’s funeral was just 2 weeks ago, the day our family was due to have its first meeting with Ameer, so we had to decide whether to visit Ameer or go to the funeral. I went from the prison to the funeral.

I decided to tell Ameer about my parents’ death. He knows how hard this is for me, which makes it hard for him – but I wanted to tell him myself so that he would see that I’m strong.

It is a strange, emotionally wrenching period. Yesterday was my daughter’s high school graduation ceremony. Ameer’s birthday is today: he will become 52.

We believe that the main purpose of arresting Ameer – other than to frighten the community – is to silence his voice.   His voice is significant for many reasons. He has been writing many strategic, forward-looking pieces to help shape thinking among the community and elsewhere. When I visit with him I urge him to keep writing. He’s allowed to send two letters a month. And I write to him and I’m keeping a journal so we can document his story.

Another, even more important, reason that Ameer’s voice is so important is that he works at three levels, locally, in the Arab world, and internationally.   Locally, he previously helped to found political parties and organizations but now he does not belong to any party. Rather, through Ittijah (an umbrella organization for about 80 civil society NGOs established by Palestinian citizens of Israel), he serves a rallying point for Palestinian civil society and political groups.   He recently co-founded the Popular Committee for the Defence of Freedoms to track and expose Israel’s harassment of its Palestinian political leaders. The High Follow-Up Committee for Arab Citizens of Israel, which represents all political forces among the community, upholds the Freedoms Committee’s activities and declarations.   Any time there has been harassment of a Palestinian political figure in the past few months the Defence of Freedoms Committee would issue a statement.

In February, they started holding community festivals in Palestinian localities every Friday to inform the community about what was going on and about the harassment of its leaders, and to mobilize people.  They held meetings in Jaffa, Nazareth, Haifa and other places.  The night he was arrested he had been at the community festival in Ber al-Sabi3.

When he and I used to talk about the Committee’s work, I would say to him your turn will come. And his turn has come. So part of silencing his voice is an attempt to silence a defender of political freedoms.   His arrest also aims to silence his voice at the regional level. He was one of the Palestinian leaders who took the initiative to link Palestinians of 1948 to the Arab world.  He was one of leaders of a conference held in Cairo in 2002 “The 1948 Palestinians knock at the door of the Arab world.” He led efforts to reveal Israeli racism to the Arab world and to call for boycotting Israel, especially since Durban conference where Ameer was one of the Arab key leaders of the conference.

Even before his arrests some Israeli writers were calling for his punishment.   Ameer was also active at the international level and Ittijah has consultative status at the United Nations Economic and Social Council, alongside other major NGOs.   This ability to network locally, at the Arab level, and internationally, coupled with the refusal to give up fundamental Palestinian human rights and his clear strategic vision – this is what I believe Israel is trying to silence.

Last year, during the war on Gaza (December 2008 – January 2009)  the GSS  called him in for questioning for several hours and said to him accusingly: You are mobilizing the youth. His ability to reach across generations and his success in reaching the new generation of Israeli Palestinians scares them. And they warned him: We can ‘disappear’ you and the next time we bring you in you should know that you will not see your family again for a long time.

And this is exactly what they did. They kidnapped him from home in the middle of the  night and kept him with no possibility to meet with anybody – neither family nor lawyers – and imposed a gag order on his arrest. They just disappeared him. Such a thing can happen in the state that calls itself democratic and law abiding!   He is a thinker who writes and speaks at conferences, a civil society organizer, and an activist who leads demonstrations and establishes committees to protest violations of human rights.   He was part of the group that produced the Haifa Declaration that sought to put forward a vision for Israeli Jewish and Palestinian relations within a comprehensive vision for the state. This should not be threatening to the state.

Since its establishment the state has treated the Palestinian community as an enemy; it has tried to erase our identity and to control us through racist laws and practises. By insisting on being a ‘Jewish state’ it cancels out our very existence. We cannot feel that we belong to a state that treats us as enemies.   So we are calling for a change in its nature: It can’t continue to insist that it is Jewish and democratic – there is no such thing.

What has happened to Ittijah? The first  2 weeks were difficult as the Israeli authorities by the GSS confiscated computers and equipment and ransacked office. But Ittijah regrouped quickly and it is now standing on its feet and active.

You say you find my strength inspiring? The truth, I don’t have a choice. There are only two choices: to be strong or to be crushed. And when I see so many people working to support Ameer’s human rights this gives me hope and power to continue . And when I tell Ameer what people are doing and the ring of solidarity, it gives him hope and power too.   I have a reponsibilty to my family members, Ameer, myself and the things we believe in. I”m strong because I believe in Ameer and what he is doing. We have dignity and identity, we have the right to protect ourselves , we have nothing more to lose more – they they pushed us  beyond the limit . We need to keep going on and believing in what we are doing and in our rights, even if the personal price is so hard.

I’m afraid that Ameer was not the first  & well not be the last one to be detained, to be harmed and suffer from persecution and torture, unless we all see the issue as our personal and collective issue. But  I’m positive when I see all the support and solidarity locally and internationally, and I want, on behalf of Ameer and myself to thank all who supported us and to ask them to continue doing that and believing in Ameer.

Janan’s evaluation of the alleged danger Ameer poses in the eyes of the security establishment is dead-on.  As I’ve written here numerous times, it goes back to Yuval Diskin’s 2007 declaration of war on the Israeli Palestinian nationalist movement.  Just as Azmi Bishara was hounded into exile by the same goons, so Makhoul is being made an example in order to say to Israel’s Arab population: if you want to remain here you will do so on our terms and not yours.  Any hopes that you may have that Israel will ever become a place hospitable to your national aspirations is nil as long as we rule.  That is why I have come to see a fight to the death developing between the intelligence services and the movement for Israeli democracy.  As long as the Meir Dagans and Yuval Diskins rule we will have endless war between Jews and Arabs in Israel and outside.

Below is a Letter from Gilboa Jail, written by Ameer and released by the Al Shabaka: Palestinian Policy Network:

May 30, 2010

After being allowed to get a pen and a piece of paper, which has been banned for the last three weeks, and after being allowed to get out of my total isolation, it’s a moment to write a short letter from my jail (Gilboa).

It’s a great opportunity for me to express my sincere thanks, greetings and appreciation to all the colleagues, friends and solidarity groups, organizations and persons, internationals, Arabs in the region, Israelis and Palestinians in the homeland and in the Diaspora. A very special salute to all those who visited my family and supported them after the trauma they passed on May 6 and since that late night.

It’s a moment to express my great appreciation to all the international & local human rights organizations which raised their voices loudly.

Also to Ittijah partner-organizations all around the world which supported my/our struggle for justice and for a fair trial in order to get to prove my innocence.

Physically I am still suffering very much but morally it’s a great feeling to know what solidarity means.

My story is that the Israeli intelligence, “The Shabak,” assumed something without knowing and without any evidence. I was…forced to explain to them in a very detailed way how exactly I did what I didn’t do, ever. In case of any logical problem for them to complete the puzzle, they have the legal tools to fill it in by so-called secret evidence, which my lawyers and I have no legal right to know about.

According to the media in Israel, I’m already guilty, a terrorist and a supporter [of] terror. The rule of the game here is that I’m guilty whether or not I prove that I’m not. This collective assumption is prior to court and trial procedures.

The abuse of evidence & fair legal procedures are crucial. The Shabak can tell lies to the court by so called “secret evidence,” “banning meetings with lawyers,” “banning the publication of information,” “imposing total isolation” and other very sophisticated ways of torture, which leave no direct evidence although it is very harsh.  I believe that my case is an opportunity to examine these…as tools for the criminalization of human rights defenders.

I would like to highlight again your support & solidarity. I look to it as an…essential and crucial message of support for the victim and [as a means] to stop the oppressor. Thank you. Let us continue with the way for justice, human dignity, human rights and ensuring an opportunity for a fair trial.

Sincerely,

Ameer Makhoul

Thanks to Nadia Hijab for her work in publicizing this letter and the interview she conducted with Janan Abdu.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Israel’s Mysterious Mr. X, Prisoner With No Name is Alleged ‘Terrorist’

Monday, June 14th, 2010
prison bars

Mr. X: prisoner with no name is accused 'terrorist' (Martin Godwin)

Yesterday, I reported that Yediot Achronot published a story about an Israeli prisoner who, according to informants in the prison service, had no name, no identity, no contact with the outside world or fellow prisoners.  He seemed truly to be a disappeared person in the midst of a country that likes to think of itself as a democracy.  And true to form, the article about Mr. X, as the article dubbed him, disappeared!  Yesterday, I agreed with Israeli blogger Yossi Gurvitz in conjecturing that the article had run afoul of the intelligence services who secured a gag order banning publication of any information about him.

An Israeli journalist today reports to me that a source, also within the prison service, confirms Yossi and I were right.  Not only is there a gag order against publishing anything about Mr. X, there is a ban on revealing that there is a gag order of any kind.  It’s a kind of double-bind theory of Israeli spookdom.

The source described Mr X as “a terrorist from one of the organizations.”  This would likely mean that Mr. X was either a Palestinian from Israel or the West Bank, either accused of terrorism or belonging to a proscribed organization like Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah or Hamas.

Now, think about this.  A man is imprisoned for no one knows what.  Not only can’t any Israeli report on who he is or what he has done.  You can’t even report that he EXISTS.  We’re talking Scaresville here.  But Israel has become such a hardened national security state that almost no one there would find anything wrong with this picture.

If we in the U.S. want to conjecture where outrages like Guantanamo, Bagram, Abu Ghraib, etc. can lead we should look no farther than Mr. X.  No matter what this man may have done (and again, we don’t have a clue whether he is guilty of anything), society–whether Israel or the U.S.– is totally corrupted when it disappears people in such a way.

I’ve absorbed my share of body blows from the pro-Israel far-right and now it’s happened at the Israeli gossip site Rotter, which has a section called Scoops.  I post some of my newsworthy Israel reporting there.  A member responded to a message which linked to my last post about Mr. X, with this tender endearment:

Perhaps you’ll stop flacking your anti-Semitic site, Silverstein?

You’ve never published a single thing in your whole sordid life.  You’ve stolen from other sites and taken credit in order to flack for your leftist, jihadist, murderous, extremist, fly by night, uber-radical, sick site.

I do so love the smell of napalm in the morning!  When they hate you like this you know you’re striking a nerve and a blow for a democratic and just Israel.

The Strange Case of Israel’s Mr. X, the Prisoner With No Name

Sunday, June 13th, 2010

This Yediot story about a prisoner with no name disappeared from the site likely as a result of a secret gag order

the man with no name
When I first started writing about the Anat Kamm case it felt like a cross between Kafka’s The Trial, a carnival Hall of Mirrors, and Chelm.  Now comes a story possibly even stranger.

Earlier today, Yediot Achronot published a story about a Mr. X imprisoned in an Israeli jail.  The man was in solitary confinement.  His jailers did not know who he was, did not share a word with him, no one came to visit him.  No one seemed to know he was there.  They didn’t even know what crime he had committed or how he came to be in the prison.  His prison cell was completely isolated from other prisoners and he couldn’t communicate in any way with them.  He was a complete mystery.  How is this possible in the Only Democracy in the Middle East?

“He is in absolute isolation from the external world,” said a source in the prison service.  “I’m not aware of any other prisoner held in such grave conditions of isolation.  In Unit 15 [where he is held], everything concerning him is secret. There are too many secrets concerning him.  What frightens is that a man can be imprisoned in Israel in 2010 and no one knows anything about him.  The man simply has no name and no identity.  We don’t even know if he has rights accorded to all other prisoners in the prison system.”

The reporter asked the service who the man was and they refused to answer.  The spokesperson would only say that his agency does not provide any information about prisoners for security reasons.  Which would seem to imply that his case is related to national security.  At the popular Israeli news forum, Rotter, some speculate that he may be a spy.

To indicate the severity of the unidentified prisoner’s offenses the cell and unit in which he is currently held was built specifically for Yigal Amir, the assassin of Israel’s prime minister.  Amir was removed to another prison.  But unlike Amir, whose family visited him regularly in this cell, Mr. X sees no one and no one sees him.

Sometime after I read this story I noticed it had disappeared from the Yediot website, which is why I offer a screenshot from Yahoo! cache.  This can mean only one thing, that the Israel censor demanded that the story be yanked.  Which only deepens the mystery.  Clearly, this individual committed (or let’s say, was convicted of committing) some security related offense, and probably a grave one.  But for the prison service not even to know who they’re guarding or even have heard a rumor about his identity seems exceedingly strange.

A commenter named Haggai below reports:

Rumours from a good source say this is a Mosad agent, suspected of espionage, and allowed to see no one but other Mosad agents.

That would sound about right. But can one imprison a Mossad agent without trial and without the world knowing the man is imprisoned? Can he simply disappear off the face of the earth like this?

Yossi Gurvitz speculates (Hebrew)  that what happened was that when the article was presented to the IDF censor, it was approved since it did not pose an imminent danger to national security (the only grounds for imposing such censorship).  But after publication, an intelligence agency (he speculates military intelligence) went to court and secured a gag order prohibiting publication, which explains the article’s removal.  It would, of course, be embarrassing to whichever agency helped put this man behind bars for the public to know what it had done.  Better not only to erase any trace of the man’s name or identity, but the article about him as well.  What a country!

Israel’s supporters like to claim it is the Only Democracy in the Middle East.  But Israel is really a national security state in which the normal rules of democracy can be suspended seemingly at will once the dreaded phrases “terror” or “national security” are invoked.  Mr. X is Exhibit A proving my point.

Thanks to Didi Remez for translating the entire Yediot article into English.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Israel Plans Prosecution of Ameer Makhoul, Uri Blau

Saturday, June 12th, 2010

The Israeli prosecutor has set a June 21st trial date for Ameer Makhoul, the director of an Israeli Palestinian NGO, who is accused of plotting espionage against Israel.  I have joined an international group of human rights activists organizing on his behalf.  I’ll make public our plans in the coming days.

I wanted to add a disturbing discovery I’ve made with the help of an Israeli peace activist.  That is, the faux-left Israeli Jewish political party Meretz couldn’t give a crap about Ameer Makhoul.  When queried about the party’s position on the matter, party chair Haim Oron had this to say:

In the Anat Kamm case as in that of Ameer Makhoul, the leadership of Meretz has opposed the use of gag orders.  But regarding their arrest, since it’s not within our ability to probe these matters or to know whether there is any truth in them, we cannot make any statement about the investigation.

When the Israeli peace activist queried him further, Oron replied:

It’s not clear what sort of pubic effort should be made concerning this matter.  The police investigated and filed very grave charges.  What should be done?  To join those who defame or those who bless [him]?  Isn’t that what courts are for?

So there you have it.  The so-called Israeli left continues to embarrass itself by betraying its values (or at least what its values should be).  As my Israeli friend wrote: “Is it any wonder they’ve gone from 12 Knesset seats to three in recent elections?”  What do they represent besides furthering their own measly existence at any price.  I wouldn’t even say they sold out.  There was very little to sell.  They simply petered out due to a lack of conviction and intestinal fortitude.

Can you imagine Israeli civil liberties, such as they are, under deep threat with two of the most prominent prosecutions in recent memory filed and Meretz goes AWOL?  Why do  you exist if not to fight for civil liberties?  And not just the civil liberties of the good folk, but the rights of those under imminent attack. The ones smeared by the secret police.  The ones called traitor and spat upon.  The tortured ones.  These are the ones who really need you and instead you decide a nap sounds like a better option.

Oron’s reply also bespeaks a terrible insularity in Israeli politics.  Jews and their parties care about Jews.  If you’re not going to vote for them, why should they have anything to do with you?  And that’s certainly true of Makhoul and the Israeli Palestinian voting bloc who get short shrift from the likes of Meretz.

I myself queried another Meretz leader (Jewish of course) who wrote in error:

I checked, and the fact is that to my knowledge, none of the MKs, including the MKs from Balad (which I believe Amir Makhoul belongs to) and Hadash (his former party home), have raised the issue in public, for the same reason that Jumes [Oron] writes.

I saw Issam Makhoul, his brother – who was an MK for Hadash, at Saturday night’s peace demonstration in Tel Aviv organized by a coalition led by Peace Now, Meretz and Hadash, with Gush Shalom and other activist movements.

He told me that he understands that the charges will be dropped in the near future, and that nothing will come of the whole affair.

So there you have it, the Attorney General has set a trial date and Meretz leadership are fully confident charges will be dropped and nothing will come of the matter.  Do I hear burying your head in the sand?

And as for the claim that the Palestinian Israeli political parties have been silent, that too is in error.  Balad and and Muhamad Barake of Hadash have spoken out, as has Ahmad Tibi.  This proves that my Israeli Jewish interlocutor, someone active in the Jewish peace movement, is so out of touch with his Palestinian counterparts that he doesn’t even know what their response has been to the arrest and torture of Ameer Makhoul.  This is what the Israeli Jewish left has come to I’m sorry to say.  Out of touch and really couldn’t be bothered to care enough to know.

Maariv also reports today that the Israeli attorney general plans to prosecute Uri Blau for betraying a military operation.  Several months ago, Blau’s attorneys had worked out an agreement whereby he would return documents stolen by Anat Kam from the IDF and neither Kamm nor Blau would be charged.  The Shin Bet violated that agreement.

Then Anat Kamm called on Blau to return the documents and he did so.  But now the Shin Bet has upped the ante.  They demand that Blau return EVERY secret document he’s ever received (not just those from Kamm).  And that is the bone that sticks in the craw for Blau and rightfully so.

The attorney general will prosecute him without regard to his return of the documents.  An astonishing statement came from the State that the basis of Blau’s crime isn’t publishing secret documents, but merely possessing them.  So let’s parse what he’s saying: that in a so-called democracy any journalist who possesses a secret document has committed a crime.  And the mere possession of the documents damages state security and endangers life.  This is no longer democracy.  This borders on police state attitudes.

Keep in mind that what Blau did was “out” the IDF for killing unarmed Palestinian militants in cold blood and then lying about it–all in violation of Supreme Court rulings saying killing a man when you could arrest him, or when civilians are present and might be harmed,, was illegal.  In addition, Blau held documents which he didn’t publish which revealed the scorched earth military strategy that the IDF planned to execute in what became Operation Cast Lead.  THIS is what constitutes damaging state security and endangering human life: revealing war crimes.

What kind of country is this?  Have they lost any contact with the notion of democracy?  Do they not have a clue what a free press means or should mean?  American Jews, you must come to understand that your Zionist dream has been reduced to this.  What a tragedy.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Mossad, the Cult of Secrecy, and Its Israeli Victims

Thursday, April 22nd, 2010


An Israeli journalist offered me a telling story about the damage and pain that the cult of secrecy, embraced by the Shin Bet and Mossad, can inflict on its Israeli victims. I apologize that many of these sources are in Hebrew and may be inaccessible to those who aren’t Hebrew speakers.

immanuel sonino

Immanuel Sonino, Mossad agent who died in line of duty and whose identity is well-kept secret (in Israel)

In 1993, two Israeli Mossad agents of the famed Kidon unit were following an Iranian defense ministry official who was meeting with an Israeli arms dealer, Nahum Manbar. Ronen Bergman, Israel’s leading intelligence reporter, writes in Point of No Return (Hebrew), that the Iranian had fingered the agents and told Manbar. Bergman says that Manbar made a scene and angrily told the agents to back off.

The Iranian official left the hotel where he was meeting with Manbar, headed to the Iranian embassy. One story has it that while riding on a motorcycle on a rain-slicked Vienna street and tailing the Iranian, a Viennese driver hit the motorcycle and killed Sonino and his colleague. But Bergman concedes there is a claim that they were murdered, presumably by the Iranians, though he doesn’t specify. Bergman also notes that when the two bodies reached Israel, the Mossad asked the pathologist to list the cause of death as a auto accident without performing an autopsy. The pathologist refused. This story too leads one to believe that things might not have been as the Mossad wished them to appear.

To this day, seventeen years later, no one in the Israeli media may utter the name of Immanuel Sonino without facing the censor’s wrath. The circumstances of the accident are also under a gag order.

Israel’s Channel 2 broadcast a profile of Sonino (concealing his name) and an interview with his parents, who mourned the fact that Sonino had a child who never knew his father and that their son’s death was shrouded in secrecy. You get a strong sense of the price the survivors must pay by not being allowed to mourn their lost loved one fully and properly.

What is equally sad about this case of censorship is that Channel 2 was forced to remove its profile, which had featured the wonderful work of the Manu Center, founded in Sonino’s memory, whose mission is to help troubled youth.  The news report even blurs the sign of the Center and doesn’t name it so as to protect the vital state secrets somehow imbued in this information. Would it have harmed the state so terribly to have allowed the grieving parents to promote the work of this project which is the only legacy that they have to memorialize him publicly?

Ironically, we only know about this story because an Israeli right wing news scoop site, Rotter, published it and uploaded the censored segment to YouTube, where Hebrew speakers can view it here.

A further irony of this story is that the Israeli being investigated, Nahum Manbar, was a Mossad operative (or at least freelancer) whose work was known and encouraged by the intelligence agency. The latter claims it had approved arms deals with the Iranians, but not for the chemical weapons Manbar was selling. There is speculation that the arms dealer was arrested and imprisoned in order to assuage anger at the death of their two agents and cover-up the fact that the Israeli was working for the agency at the time of the accident. It is said that the then Mossad director, Shabtai Shavit, blamed Manbar for the deaths even though he claims he had nothing to do with them himself and didn’t find out about them until after his trial ended.

So here again, as in the Anat Kamm-Uri Blau case, secrecy is used to conceal unpleasant and inconvenient screw-ups by the intelligence agencies or IDF. This is the corrosive cult of secrecy taken to ridiculous lengths.  We’re just doing our part to lift the pall and let some sunshine into the room.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Anat Kamm: the Story That Dare Not Speak Her Name

Sunday, April 4th, 2010
anat kam

Anat Kam in more carefree days

If you’re an Israeli editor or reporter, you know what thousands of other Israelis know.  That Anat Kam is under house arrest for allegedly leaking up to 1,000 top secret IDF documents to Haaretz reporter Uri Blau, who’s been writing some of the most hard-hitting exposes about army and defense ministry malfeasance over the past year or so.  You also know that Blau is in self-imposed exile in London aware that the police want him for questioning in the case and that Haaretz’s lawyers are negotiating for his return.

You know that there is a prosecution-requested gag order on the fact that she was arrested and the reason for her arrest, which makes her the most widely known “disappeared” person possibly in the world.  You know that Kam faces an espionage charge, and up to 14 years in prison.  You know that her lawyers are also negotiating a plea bargain and that she is hoping for no jail time or a reduced sentence.  You’d also know that Kam and her lawyer have lobbied hard and largely successfully for Hebrew blogs, Hebrew Wikipedia and other online sites to take down material about her arguing it will improve her chances of getting a less severe sentence.

That’s what you’d know.  And also what you can’t breathe a word of to your readers.  So what can you do?  You can write eloquent, oblique columns decrying military censorship, secret detentions, gag orders, the over-cozy relationship between the military, intelligence agencies and the judiciary.  You can even tell your readers there’s a really big story about which you can’t tell them.

It’s all very strange when you read such material.  It reminds you of a blind man feeling his way across the back of a camel and trying to guess what it is, all while you’re seeing it right before your own eyes.  You feel sorry for these poor souls who know many things but can’t convey them to the rest of their countrymen and women.  But after feeling sorry, you begin to feel angry that none of them takes the bull by the horns and does a Peter Finch, yelling “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore,” and then spilling the beans.

While it’s true that Israeli media outlets could face severe sanction for breaking a gag order–their reporters could lose their licenses, government lawyers could tie them up in court for years, they could lose access to government news sources–it seems to me that if Israel is a democracy and if there is a press worthy of the name that someone has to step up and defy the bastards.  So far, no one has (though some brave Israeli journalists like Mya Guarnieri have reported the story for foreign papers).

Not so Israeli bloggers though.  They have stepped up to the plate.  They are reporting this story.  They are naming names.  They are not intimidated.  Blogs like Nimby, Philosophical Outlook, and Human Communication have done what blogs should do when all others around them have lost their nerve or their balls–they told it like it is.  There may be other blogs I’m overlooking and I’d love to hear about them.  I also invite those interested in learning more about this to join the bi-lingual Facebook group, We Want the Truth About Anat Kam, where I’m learning much of this.

Since I began this blog in 2003 I’ve felt a strong need to link my work to Israelis (and Palestinians) including bloggers.  It is important to share important political developments and create a sense of community between us and I’ve tried to do that.  Bloggers unfortunately don’t like being organized or told what to do or what’s important.  So my efforts have been fitful.  Sometimes like at the J Street bloggers panel they work and other times not.

Given the language gap it’s also proven hard to share out respective work.  You can’t easily reprint the best work of Hebrew language blogs unless you can translate it and that takes time and energy.  And vice versa.  All of this meant that bloggers in Israel and bloggers outside Israel were more or less like ships passing in the night.

But this story has changed that.  Now in their hour of need many Israelis see the benefits of foreign media including blogs.  That’s the only way they currently can stay up to date on what their government doesn’t want them to know.  This blog has more visibility inside Israel than perhaps it has ever had before.  What I hope is that this will not change after the Kam story does.  We need each other.

In one of the more ironic developments in a case loaded with irony, it seems that Anat Kam wrote a 2009 story for Walla while she worked there, covering a conference on the use and abuse of military gag orders.  The money quote and most poignantly ironic passage is this one from a senior Israeli police officer participating on the panel who, after reminding the audience of the supposedly welcome fact that the police request only 60 such gag orders per year, says:

Clearly I prefer to conduct investigations in secret, but I’m aware of the limitations on the police in a democratic society.  Sometimes, we seek to prevent publicizing an investigation in order that law-breakers won’t benefit from exposure of the information.

If the results of the Kam case weren’t so troubling, I’d almost call this irony delicious.  As it is, it makes me feel outrage.

How’s this for another irony: Wikipedia, which exists to disseminate knowledge and information irregardless of the whims of government authority decided in the case of Anat Kam to remove its article from Hebrew Wikipedia at Kam’s request.  You’d think the editors would’ve understood that self-censorship by Wikipedia itself is a terribly problematic development.  The article remains down.

I read another Israeli on Facebook pose an interesting argument defending Kam’s act of leaking top secret military documents.  He said that she could argue that though she was breaking the law in doing so, her leak was designed to uncover a far worse crime, that of targeted killings committed by the highest echelons of the military in violation of the law as determined by the Supreme Court.  This argument might work better in a constitutional democracy in which Court rulings are viewed as legal precedent.  In Israel that isn’t so.  But I still think it’s an appealing argument.

Finally, Ran Cohen of Nimby e-mailed me today that there is one benefit, either intended or unintended, for the IDF and intelligence apparatus in this gag order: it focuses attention on the plight of a young women while diverting attention from where it should be–on the rampant, unaccountable, illegal acts of the IDF high command.  It allows us to lose sight of the fact that the Israeli Supreme Court, faced with Haaretz reports that the army’s most senior officers were giving the judiciary the middle finger regarding complying with its 2006 ruling on targeted assassinations–did nothing.  The IDF enjoys virtual impunity in Israeli society and the Court does little or nothing to prevent it.  Uri Blau’s story reveals that for some in Israel the rule of law is little more than an inconvenient theory honored in the breach, if at all.

Anat Kam’s is the tragedy of an individual, while the documents she leaked reveal the tragedy of an entire nation whose democracy has been eviscerated.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Shin Bet Secretly Detains Reporter for Leaking Top-Secret IDF Memos

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

Shin bet logo

NOTE: On March 14th, I was the first blogger or journalist to report this story outside Israel.  Subsequently, an Israeli peace activist informed me that Anat Kamm’s attorney and friends have asked others not to publicize her case.  In honor of that, I decided to take down this post as I did not wish to harm her defense.  I wrote to Kam’s attorney, Avigdor Feldman, and asked him to confirm that he did not wish any public discussion of her case.  He has not replied.  For that reason, I have decided to repost this story with some amplifications and editing to reflect new information I’ve learned.

*   *   *

We’re going to be getting into deep territory tonight regarding Israeli military intelligence, the Shin Bet, and their ability to make a mockery of alleged Israeli democracy and freedom of the press.

Anat Kam: 'Disappeared' Israeli journalist (Ido Kenan)

An Israeli friend brought me word that Anat Kamm, an entertainment writer for the popular Israeli internet portal, Walla, was secretly arrested and imprisoned, after which she was placed under house arrest by Israeli authorities.  Needless to say, this is a highly unusual development.  In fact, I can’t remember the last time this happened to an Israel journalist.  I apologize that most of the material I’ll be linking to is still in Hebrew and not yet translated.  If that situation changes I’ll be adding English language links or sources.

Though Kam denies this, Israeli sources maintain she has been fingered by the Shin Bet as the source of a highly damaging 2008 Haaretz report that noted that a number of Palestinian militants who, the IDF claimed in separate media reports, were killed during firefights were actually assassinated in cold blood.  This of course wouldn’t be news since it has happened many times before.  What was news was that in 2006 the Supreme Court laid down specific and limited procedures under which targeted assassinations may be pursued.  Haaretz revealed that the IDF was ignoring the Supreme Court’s ruling and essentially killing militants in cold-blood and covering up the fact.  It approved killings even if civilians were also likely to be killed.  It approved killing suspects who were not “ticking-bombs,” another contravention of the Supreme Court.  In fact, as recently as 2009 the IDF killed Palestinians under suspicious circumstances which Palestinians have labelled murder in cold blood, leading one to believe that targeted assassinations continue.

 

The Haaretz report, which presumably and inexplicably passed military censorship, displayed two IDF top-secret documents drawn up by the military senior command, which laid out the provisions for the killings and proved that they were ignoring the Supreme Court ruling.

A former intelligence agent, Jonathan Dahoah Halevi, working as a researcher for Dore Gold’s Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, examined the documents in detail attempting to trace the source.  While he didn’t specifically identify Kam, he did make clear that he believed the “Deep Throat” served in a position in military intelligence which allowed access to such documents.

Dahoah Halevi fed the story to ShalomLife, a Canadian Israeli news portal which published this rather sloppy right-wing slant on the Kam case. Dahoah Halevi was the editor of Shalom Toronto, listed as a sponsor of ShalomLife. The publisher of ShalomLife, Yossi Arbel, is also the publisher of Shalom Toronto. Some speculate that it may be an attempt by the Jerusalem Center to smoke out an Israeli journalist who will break the gag order by reporting on a story previously reported outside Israel.

On a rather humorous personal note, the author of the ShalomLife article confuses this blog with an “internet forum belonging to the Israeli left” by misattributing a quotation from this post to such an entity:

Internet forums belonging to the Israeli left have expressed support for the leak by Anat Kam, and have called it “a moral act” and “a civil duty”. One of the messages stated: “We must fight for Israeli democracy even if Anat Kam cannot or will not do it herself, and even if the Israeli press cannot or does not want to do it itself.”

There is one especially salient, disturbing passage in the ShalomLife story, which speculates on Kam’s motives in leaking the documents:

It is safe to say that the leaker wished to advance a political agenda and arouse wider public criticism in Israel and the world towards the IDF’s focused and deliberate policies against agents of terror.

First, it is convenient for an Israeli rightist to focus on Kamm’s alleged political agenda and neglect that she undoubtedly had a moral and democratic agenda as well.  Second, since the author of the Jerusalem Affairs analysis was himself a former intelligence officer and because Gold is a Likud loyalist, we can safely assume that this reflects the Shin Bet’s own views in the matter.  Which is all the more reason to fight this detention tooth and nail.  The far-right can natter all they wish about opposition to its policies being political, but the truth is that opposing targeted assassination and leaking material that documents violations of the law is a MORAL act and a the democratic duty of a citizen.  We must fight for Israeli democracy even if Anat Kamm cannot or will not do so herself.  And even if the Israeli press cannot or will not do so itself.  On that note, Haaretz, who used Kam’s materials for its scoop, has so far written nothing about her predicament.  That seems to me an unfortunate editorial decision.

The Israeli sources who have written about this note that there is a military gag under preventing reporting not only about the alleged leak, but that Kamm was arrested at all.  I call this censorship of infinite regress.  Which may explain why Haaretz has been silent. One hopes the Israeli press will find their voice and do their duty as journalists regardless of the strictures of the national security state.

Those who believe in Israeli democracy should explain how a citizen can disappear without a trace.  Is this China, where the government denies it even is detaining a troublesome dissident who has disappeared?  Is this the face Israel wants the world to see?  Does the security apparatus have the right to run roughshod over whatever civil liberties citizens retain?  I should add that this isn’t quite as bad as China.  Some people now know what happened to Anat Kamm.  She is safe although under detention.  But other than that, there are a lot of what Don Rumsfeld was fond of calling, in that inimitable way he had with the English language, “known unknowns.”

Apparently, it took over a year, but they have finally closed in on Kamm as the culprit.  They have really put the fear of God into her.  As Israeli bloggers and activists have become aware of this incident and written about it publicly, associates of Kamm have approached them asking that they desist.  Each individual has to consult their conscience in situations like this.  But I personally can see no benefit to Israeli democracy or even Kamm herself by keeping silent.  Undoubtedly, intelligence agencies have threatened her with horrible punishments if she doesn’t maintain absolute muteness.  As a 23-year-old relatively unfamiliar with the school of hard knocks that is the Shin Bet or military intelligence (where she presumably worked and which presumably investigated the leak), she’s quaking in her boots.  Who could blame her?

But I think that others need to have different priorities.  Even if Kamm doesn’t want to, or can’t fight for herself we must do so ourselves.  And again, we do this for the sake of Israeli democracy.  We do this to attempt to draw red lines and prevent the intelligence services from crossing them.  For we know that the Israeli national security state puts little stock in the rights of its citizens–witness the trampling of the rights of those whose passports and identities were stolen by the Mossad in carrying out the Dubai assassination.

We must make common cause with those Israelis and human rights NGOs who fight against such outrages.  As such, a measure of thanks is due the Israel Democracy Institute and its ejournal, The Seventh Eye, which has featured fine reporting on this matter.  Sol Salbe has directed me to an excellent archive of linked online articles about Kam’s situation.  Indymedia Israel also wrote up the story (web page now taken down) providing additional information.  Maariv published a highly allusive piece by Kam’s apparent boss, which reminds me of samizdat of decades past, which satirized the political culture of authoritarian regimes through allegory, indirection and oblique allusion.  Here is the first sentence:

How can a journalist be detained for over a month and everyone stays silent?  The journalists in Shoo-Shoo-land must be nonentities, otherwise it would be impossible to explain how in the past month not a single one of them wrote a single word on the journalist’s detention.

Let’s not forget that we’re talking about the Only Democracy in the Middle East here.  And lest we forget how the Shin Bet has dealt in the past with similarly damaging incidents, we need only remind ourselves of the Kav 300 Affair.

I wonder why the spooks did not target Kamm sooner since she leaked the documents over a year ago.  Possibly, she was working on a current story they didn’t want to see the light of day and this prevented her from reporting it.  Or perhaps, the current political climate in which the far-right is running roughshod over the rights of peace and human rights activists with the approval of the government has emboldened the intelligence establishment to light out after practicing journalists.  It may also be possible that Kamm is part of a larger constellation and the investigation includes her, but goes beyond her as well.

We must fight back.  We must help Israeli democrats turn back this assault on freedom of the press, free speech, and democracy.