Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘Naomi Chazan’

Seattle Conference: Gaza Humanitarian Crisis

Sunday, June 27th, 2010

Yesterday night, 200 people joined us for the conference I initiated, Gaza’s Humanitarian Crisis: the Failure of U.S. Policy. I was delighted with the turnout and the quality of the talks by Steve Niva, David Schermerhorn, and Hazim Shafi.

This event was, in a way, a sequel to an event I organized last December on the Iran nuclear crisis and the failure of U.S. and Israeli policy in that arena.

When you blog as intensively as I do about the Israeli-Arab conflict and face an especially severe crisis, you want to do something more than just write a blog post. You want to go into your community and reach people where they live; motivate them to do something on behalf of sanity, justice and human decency.

That’s why I approached Brenda Bentz of SABEEL of Puget Sound with my idea, which she graciously supported along with St. Mark’s Cathedral, which provided the venue. I am sorry to say that Seattle’s Jewish community is not yet ready to confront these issues by hosting such a panel. Though through some lobbying of my own, the JTNews sent a reporter to the event and there will be a story about it in the next issue. I understand there were four “operatives” from Stand With Us in attendance as well. Undoubtedly, they were seeking proof that we were propagating “anti-Israel” propaganda.

Below, I’m going to post my own remarks from last night. When we have video, audio, or photos available, I’ll upload that as well:

Israel Under Siege–Enforces Consensus, Jettisons Democracy

I have the unenviable task of telling you tonight about the state of the State of Israel.  In short, it’s not good.  I’ve been following Israeli politics since I was a teenager in 1967 and I don’t think I’ve ever felt more alarmed and depressed about what is happening within Israel.

We all knew when Bibi Netanyahu became prime minister that we were in for a far-right government.  But sad to say I think we were spoiled by the more centrist governments that preceded them.  We thought that since both Ariel Sharon and Ehud Olmert were former Likud political leaders that Bibi would perhaps be a slightly more conservative version.

But Bibi has been a revelation, and not a good one.  Under his rule, the Israeli peace and human rights community have come under fire as never before.  The leader of the New Israel Fund, a relatively tame advocate of Israeli civil society and democracy, was vilified in all the major Israeli newspapers in an ad displaying a caricature of her with a rhino horn sprouting from her forehead.  It was an ugly display worthy of some of the lowest propaganda of the Nazi anti-Semitic publication, Der Shturmer.

A few months ago, Uri Blau, an Israeli journalist writing for Haaretz was forced into exile because he received secret documents from an IDF soldier named Anat Kamm.  These memos documented major military violations of an Israeli Supreme Court ruling barring targeted killings of Palestinian militants who could be apprehended non-violently.  Not only did the Israeli intelligence service, Shabak, threaten to prosecute Uri Blau, Haaretz’s military correspondent now residing in London, they did prosecute Kamm, threatening her with a life sentence.  Essentially, this woman is an Israeli Daniel Ellsberg, yet she faces calls from the Israeli far-right for hanging.

An Israeli Palestinian Knesset member, Haneen Zoabi, joined the Gaza flotilla and sailed on the ill-fated Mavi Marmara.  If she’d been a regular Israeli citizen she could’ve been arrested and imprisoned for her action.  Luckily for her, she had parliamentary immunity.  When she returned to the Knesset, right-wing MKs called her a traitor and killer.  She arose to defend herself and all hell broke loose.  A Jewish female Knesset member lunged at her and would’ve taken her down if she hadn’t been restrained by Knesset security.  Everyone knows how fractious and dysfunctional the Israeli parliament can be.  Many of us have seen the shouting matches and bad behavior.  But this was a different order of magnitude.  Even an Israeli TV newscaster called it a “near-lynching.”

The Israeli security apparatus has gone to war against Israeli Palestinian political leaders.  This goes back to an announcement in 2007 by Yuval Diskin, Shin Bet chief, that he planned to wage all-out combat against Palestinian nationalists.  He viewed even legal political activities that advanced views that were detrimental to the notion that Israel was solely a Jewish state, as anathema.  He made clear as part of this crusade, he would pull out all the stops.  And he has done so.

In the past month, the Shin Bet arrested the director of an Israeli Palestinian NGO named Ameer Makhoul.  They came to his Haifa apartment in the dead of night, ransacked it, and confiscated all the electronic equipment in it, including cell phones and computers belonging to his teenage daughters.  They slapped a gag order on his arrest.  No Israeli reporter could say what had happened to Makhoul.  He essentially disappeared into the maw of the secret police.

One of my jobs as a blogger is to break such gag orders and I’m pleased to say that with the help of Israeli sources I did.  After my reporting, we knew who had been arrested.  We found out about the preposterous charges against him, that he had consorted with known Hezbollah agents and offered to spy against his country.

The identity of the alleged Hezbollah agent was also under gag order.  But I broke that too and revealed that Hassan Jaja was so dangerous that he was a landscape designer and nurseryman in Amman who ran an Arab environmental NGO.

Despite the ludicrousness of the charges, this didn’t stop the Shin Bet from torturing Makhoul during the three weeks when they held him incommunicado, preventing access to his lawyers or family.  He was deprived of sleep, tied to a chair that was bolted to the floor and forced to confirm a narrative that his interrogators dictated to him.  It reminds me of a Teheran show trial.

This is how low Israel has gone.  In an effort to combat the international campaign to hold Israel accountable for its actions its actions in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead, the nation has inflicted upon itself and the rest of the world a sort of pathological madness.

It called Judge Richard Goldstone, author of the UN report on the war, a traitor to his people.  Accused him of a blood libel against Israel.  Accused him of being a moser, a Jew who during the Holocaust ferreted out Jews in hiding and betrayed them to the Gestapo.  They tarnished Goldstone’s record as a South African anti-apartheid judge by comparing him to Josef Mengele.

Some of us attended the last SABEEL conference held here in this Cathedral and heard Israeli Professor Neve Gordon’s address.  He, several months ago, electrified observers of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by publicly expressing his support for the global BDS movement in the Los Angeles Times and The Guardian.  For this, he too was excoriated.  The president of Ben Gurion University where he teaches, claimed he had crossed a red line that no professor had a right to cross, doing damage to the State.  Israelis across the political spectrum attempted to make the case that academic freedom did not entitle someone to speak ill of Israel or Zionism.  They suggested not so subtly Gordon might be happier living elsewhere (a fate that befell Ilan Pappe and Tanya Reinhardt).

Ben Gurion’s President Carmi essentially said she would fire Gordon if she could.  But of course she couldn’t since there is such a thing as academic freedom still honored in Israel.

Add to this, the fact that a British trustee of Ben Gurion told a Jewish newspaper that Prof. David Newman, a colleague of Gordon’s should die because he criticized Israeli policy in a British TV documentary.  140 faculty members protested to the president about the trustee’s irresponsible statement and she promptly ignored them.

Speaking of dying, last week Neve Gordon received a bona fide death threat from an anonymous source, calling him a traitor and warning him that the writer would come to the campus and kill him.  While Pres. Carmi denounced the act, she also in effect blamed Gordon for bringing it on himself by his “irresponsible” behavior.

In light of the repression and paranoia I’ve outlined above, it isn’t surprising that the IDF perpetrated the debacle it did on the Mavi Marmara.  I don’t know exactly what happened.  But in the most charitable interpretation I imagine that after it faced resistance from some passengers and the belief among the assault team that some members were captured, I believe there was a general breakdown in unit discipline and chaos ensued.  While I don’t believe the IDF planned to execute anyone and engage in cold blooded murder, the stage was certainly set by spokespeople who threatened that Israel was prepared to use force to prevent the ships from reaching Gaza.

Now, a word on the Israeli investigation of this disaster.  In short, it too is a disaster.  Netanyahu has appointed three Israelis and two foreign “observers.”  The panel is chaired by Yaakov Tirkel, a 75 year old retired Supreme Court justice who has said publicly that he holds the honor of the IDF above “the enemy.”  The justice is known for siding with the government on national security cases.  Another Israeli panelist is Amos Horev, an 86 year-old retired general who, in 1943, was accused of castrating a Palestinian villager who sexually harassed a Jewish woman.  The third member is Shabtai Rosenne, a 94 year-old former diplomat who counseled the Israeli prime minister after the notorious Kibya massacre orchestrated by Ariel Sharon to lie to the world by claiming that Israeli civilians perpetrated the killings and not the army.  An Israeli newspaper photographed this poor man at his home wearing the type of summer shorty pajamas worn by elderly folks and tended by his Filipino caretaker.  I call this the geriatric commission.  They should hold the sessions in a retirement home rather than a government conference room.

One of the foreign observers, Lord David Trimble, just co-founded a European pro-Israel advocacy organization whose mission is to oppose “delegitimization” of Israel within Europe.  The second observer is a former judge in the Canadian army.

In short, the fix is in.  No one really believes this body will satisfy anyone except Israel.  Haaretz has editorialized to that effect.  Ban Ki Moon has warned the commission isn’t credible.  We need a true international investigation.  Nothing less will suffice.

Now, I’d like to turn to U.S. policy.  As an American Jew and supporter of Israeli-Palestinian peace, I had high hopes of Barack Obama.  I still do.  But I’ve become doubtful that any of those hopes will ever be realized.

When faced with the intransigence of the Israeli government, whether the settlement freeze, the Goldstone Report or the Gaza flotilla massacre, the operative mode seems to be keeping things quiet and under control.  There never seems to be backbone when it’s called for.

When the Goldstone Report was first issued, the U.S. attempted to block it and threatened a Security Council veto if it was brought up there.  When Turkey and the nations of the world demanded an international investigation of the Mavi Marmara murders, the U.S. said an Israeli investigation would do.  When things got hot and heavy in the aftermath of the killings and pressure mounted to end the Gaza siege, the Obama administration made do with merely easing the suffering rather than ending it completely.

This is an administration satisfied with half measures.  There are times when half-measures may work to quiet a crisis if it isn’t terribly severe.  But we’re way past severe when it comes to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.  The situation calls for backbone, for perseverance, for fortitude.  Instead we get waffling, and zig-zagging.

Finally, I want to note that today is the fourth anniversary of the capture of IDF soldier Gilad Shalit by Palestinian militants.  During that time, there have been negotiations between Israel and Hamas over his fate.  Essentially, the latter demanded the release of several hundred jailed Palestinians.  Israel balked.  While everything about the case is veiled in a fog, from what I’ve read the sides were close to agreement a number of times.  But negotiations foundered over which detainees would be released and how many.  Israel balked when faced with the prospect of releasing those with blood on their hands.

I want Gilad Shalit to return to the bosom of his family.   But I also want Israel to recognize Hamas and end its siege.  I want the residents of Sderot to be safe from Qassam rockets.  But I also want the residents of Gaza to be free from paralyzing fear and anticipation of the next war.

There is a way out of this mess.  The 2002 Saudi initiative proposed Arab acceptance of Israeli in return for a withdrawal to near-1967 borders.  Israel has rejected this peace plan, which is still on the table.  There is only one way to save Israel: to make peace.  Everyone knows the parameters of the future settlement.  The only question is how many will have to die before Israel comes to its senses and agrees to it.  To quote a Jewish saying: “may it happen speedily and in our day.”

Enhanced by Zemanta

Im Tirtzu is NOT, Repeat NOT a Bunch of Jack-Booted Right-Wing Thugs!

Monday, May 17th, 2010
im tirtzu parody

Im Tirtzu parody site ("Whether You Want it or Not")

Got that? You better. ‘Cause if you don’t or if you have any other opinion on the matter Ronen Shoval, founder of the Israeli hasbara outfit will set you straight; or else sue your ass off. I don’t know if Ronen has considered how he can do that to those outside Israel, but considering how many Israelis he’s threatened with lawsuits if they bad-mouth the group, he’ll undoubtedly find a way to sic someone on me as well. But like Didi Remez, one of those he’s threatened, I have no fear of his thuggery.

Ronen Shova

Ronen Shoval, Herzl's capo di tutti (Yanai Yechiel)

There’s a lot of interesting matters to report about the thugs who parodied New Israel Fund chair, Naomi Chazan by displaying a rhino horn on her head in ads which accused her and NIF of being traitors to the State of Israel for cooperating with the Goldstone Report (NIF didn’t, though some of its grantees did).

Those of you who know and use Wikipedia may think of it as a repository of online information, a sort of freewheeling encyclopedia of knowledge.  Everywhere but Israel that is.  Partly because of excessive editorial caution, partly because of a societal fear of violating political consensus, and partly because of legal blackmail, Hebrew Wikipedia shies away from a number of controversial subjects.  I wrote here that it removed an article about Anat Kamm and refused to publish anything until well after the gag order about her arrest was lifted (a number of us interested in the subject made sure there was an English Wikipedia entry).

Now, Wikipedia has also removed an article about Im Tirtzu under threat of lawsuit if it calls the group “right-wing.”  The editors refuse this concession and their only recourse seems to be to remain silent on the entire issue.  You can’t find any article about the group in Hebrew Wikipedia.  I’m not enough of a Wikipedian to know how the various editions are run and how each edition relates to the broader Wikipedia movement, but it seems to me that Hebrew Wikipedia falls far short of the free-wheeling, authority-defying standards that I’ve always thought the broader project represented.

I cannot exert any pressure on the contents or editors of Hebrew Wikipedia.  I doubt they know or care what I have to say.  But I will certainly report its deficiencies to my readers and hope that they will make my views known within an Israeli context.

Let’s tell it like it is.  Ronen Shoval is a thug.  Maybe he’s not a thug in the sense of beating Naomi Hazan up in a dark alley in Tel Aviv and sending her to the hospital.  But he’s a garden-variety political thug.  Thugs threaten.  They bully.  They use the system to get what they want.  They confront.  They get in your face.  So what do you do if you’re a target of these biryonim?  Do you remain silent?  Do you worry about lawyer’s fees?  Do you back down?  Hell no.  Not unless you want them to redouble their attacks on you.

You stand toe to toe and face to face.  You let them know you will defend your position b’chol m’odecha (“everything in your power”).  You let them know if they want to draw metaphoric blood their’s will be mixed with yours.  I tell them if they want to threaten to sue, bring it on (just as Didi has done, kol hakavod lo ["more power to him"]).

Shoval, or whoever directs or advises him, might want to consider that vacant threats of legal action tend to provoke precisely the types of hostile responses to Im Tirtzu which bring on the threats to begin with.

So here’s something else to stew over Ronen.  This blog has reported that It Tirtzu received $200,000 over two years from John Hagee’s Christians United for Israel.  Hagee, the apocalyptic “not-one-inch” Christian Zionist boasts about contributing millions to Israel.  I’ve listed a good deal of his settler and right-wing grantees.

Yossi Gurvitz reveals in his Israeli blog that Im Tirtzu is using the American Jewish settler group, the Central Fund of Israel, as its pass-through 501c3 which enables U.S. donors to receive a tax-deduction in return for their support for right wing Israeli political thuggery.  Since Im Tirtzu is a fairly new organization, there will not yet be an IRS 990 record of how much the group will receive from CFI.  But considering the latter raised $47-million in 2008, the amount could be sizable.  Undoubtedly, a chunk of it will go to pay Im Tirtzu’s lawyer’s fees for all the Israelis and American Jews they plan to sue for slander.

In case you hadn’t heard of CFI or don’t believe my claims about them.  Here are some of the wonderful enterprises they’ve funded:  Honenu, which provides legal representation for Jewish terrorists like Yigal Amir and Jack Teitel and lobbies for their release from prison.  Women in Green, whose leader, Nadia Matar, supported the assassination of Mahmoud Abbas during a speech she gave at a Manhattan shul a few years ago.  Over a half-million dollars of these funds went to support “security” for Israeli settlements which can include anything from K-9 attack dogs to communication gear to Uzis.

As Yossi Gurvitz says, if something looks like a right-wing duck and walks and talks like one then it is one:

Im Tirzu’s masquerading as a centrist movement, while it feeds at the trough of an extreme right wing fundraising society, should cast a shadow on each and every one of its claims.

Im Tirtzu is a danger to Israeli democracy.   Indeed its flourishing indicates something deeply rotten with the Israeli body politic.

For those who need a good, healthy dose of satire and who know some Hebrew, take yourself immediately to this parody site, Im Tirtzu Im Lo Tirzu (“Whether You Want It or Not,” a parody of the original Herzl-inspired name, “If You Will It”).  The parody site’s sub-title is: “The quiet fascist revolution.”  Shoval’s lawyers should be filing suit shortly…

Which brings me to the observation that the closer Israel gets to flat-out authoritarianism the stronger, sharper and more telling becomes the political satire.  This is how Vaclav Havel got his start before the Velvet Revolution took hold.  It must’ve been what it was like in the days of Sovet samizdat.  It’s probably like this in Ahmadinejad’s Iran.  Is this what Israel has come to?  Instead of the Prelude to a Kiss, it’s the prelude to full-blown rightist supremacy.  The Shin Bet will “advise” the prime minister, who will dutifully do as he is told.  Or better yet as in Russia, the prime minister might just as well BE a former officer in the intelligence services (that would be Tzipi Livni if she ever gets anywhere near the prime ministership, which is highly doubtful).

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Im Tirtzu Threatens Lawsuit Against Facebook Group

Thursday, March 11th, 2010
Im Tirtzu is fascist facebook group

Im Tirtzu: a Fascist Movement

The leader of the nationalist pro-Israel advocacy group, Im Tirtzu, threatened the founder of a mocking Facebook group with libel and court action.  Ronen Shoval is the founder of the Israeli NGO, which smeared New Israel Fund chair, Naomi Hazan, depicting her with a rhinoceros horn in demeaning newspaper advertisements.  Im Tirtzu’s intent was the assault NIF for it’s alleged role in coordinating Israeli human right testimony that buttressed the Goldstone Report.

Shoval wrote an intimidating e mail to Roy Yellin, who created the Facebook group, Im Tirtzu is Fascist warning that if he didn’t close the Facebook group in 72 hours he would haul him to court.  Yellin, a former spokesperson for the Meretz party, mocked Shoval’s threat and responded that he’d meet him in court and prove the charges true.  This is the type of penny ante harrassment for which the Israeli far-right is well known.  In fact it’s astonishing that Shoval would waste his time with this, all the while proving how little respect he has for freedom of speech, a supposed hallmark of Israeli democracy.  Not to mention drawing attention to Im Tirtzu is Fascist.

I invite you to join 2,000 2,300 other members of Im Tirtzu is Fascist and tell Shoval where he can take himself.  The founder of Im Tirtzu was at one time leader of the pro-settler student group, Orange Cell, but now claims he is a man of the “center.”  Considering there no longer is a viable left in Israeli politics, he may not be far wrong.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Jerusalem Post: Profiting from Mossad Murder

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

Jerusalem Post earning shekels from Mossad murder

The rest of the world may be troubled by the Mossad’s flagrant violation of national sovereignty in the assassination of Mahmoud al-Mabouh.  They may be angry that their passports were cloned or the financial system jiggered to support Israeli terror.  But that’s not stopping from Israelis from flaunting their pride at such mayhem.  Not to mention making a shekel or two in the process.

Mossad's Operation Dubai: what fun, what adventure, what intrigue!

The N.Y. Times prominently advertises historic photos in its pages.  Imagine if instead the Times replaced this revenue enhancing feature with T-shirt promotions like this.  You can’t conceive of this?  Well, that should tell  you quite a bit about the relative quality of each publication.  At least, the Times has standards and doesn’t believe in profiting from murder.  There are clearly Americans who’d be happy to do so (though I haven’t yet seen any t-shirts boasting of the CIA’s drone assassinations of Taliban militants).  But does that mean we need to promote them in the pages of our major newspapers.

As one of my readers said about the Jerusalem Post’s involvement in this trade: putting the sh-ande in shmateh (“the shame in newsrag;” shmateh also refers to the “rag trade,” hence t-shirts ).

This is the same rag that allowed Alan Dershowitz to smear me by inferring that I published my work at a website whose author is a Holocaust Revisionist.  The same newspaper which ignored my request that they correct the record.  I should add that the Huffington Post at least had some compunctions about Dershowitz’s distortions and edited his false claim.

This is the same Jerusalem Post which published a full page ad picturing New Israel Fund chair, Naomi Chazan as an Israel-goring rhinoceros a la Der Shturmer.  The same Post which fired her as a columnist when she politely requested that they not run the ad and then threatened she would sue them.

No one should be surprised at this execrable taste.  The Post is the home of the most noxious of right-wing Likudist fanatics including Caroline Glick and Isi Liebler among others.  Alan Dershowitz finds a cozy home there as well.

I don’t expect much from the Post.  But this is a new low.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Burston on Gaza War as Root of All Israeli Evil

Sunday, February 14th, 2010

Brad Burston, Haaretz’s columnist can be a helluva fine writer.  I’ve written at least one laudatory post about him.  After doing so, I read pieces by Burston which seemed almost to be written by a different person.  They were churlish pieces attacking Israel’s Jewish critics.  I chalked it up to a journalist feeling that it was his duty to show he could criticize both the right and left.  I thought I would never find a reason to write about his work again, till tonight.

Burston has written one of the most powerful, cogent and hard-hitting critiques–not only of the Gaza war, but of the current mess in which Israel finds itself in–I’ve ever read.  Seemingly every Israeli NGO or peace activist is under savage attack.  At the present moment, Israel faces a civil liberties crisis as dire as the U.S. faced during the McCarthy era.  The New Israel Fund, a classical Zionist NGO if there ever was one, is under mortal threat.  Its leader, Naomi Hazan has been publicly and graphically attacked in terms that would’ve made Goebbels proud.  Richard Goldstone has been called a traitor to his people.  Alan Dershowitz as much as put a price on his head.  Jewish women have been arrested for trying to leyn Torah at the Wall.

So it is like a balm in Gilead to read such graceful, soaring language from Burston:

This is about fear of the dark. Of the monstrous. In this case, the terror of finally uncovering what we ourselves are really made of.

This is about the lengths we will go, and the depths, in order to protect what we so desperately need to believe about ourselves. This is about how many others we will need to blame, vilify, assault, scapegoat and smear, before we actually take one wholly honest long look in the mirror.

This is about the war we made in Gaza, and what it did to Israel. This is about how Israel’s conduct of the war has done more damage to the Jewish state than all the thousands and thousands of Palestinian rockets and mortar shells put together. It has been a year and more since a truce was called in Gaza, and – thanks in no small part to Israel’s freely admitted policy of hamstringing and stonewalling UN investigators – the world is still at war with Israel.

The result is only now becoming felt. In a thousand ways, in new ways every single day, we have brought the war home.

Israel’s battle plan, which effectively called for bludgeoning Hamas and the whole of Gaza into a state of shock, had the further effect, intentional or not, of inducing shock in Israel itself.

Here Burston presents a daring thesis for an Israeli audience–that Goldstone was right:

In some cases, shock expresses itself in combativeness. A lashing out even at those who are trying to help.

In our state of shock, we were unable to see that Richard Goldstone was trying to save us. And that the Goldstone Report is exactly what Israel needs. We fought him every step of the way, convincing ourselves – just as in Gaza – that the unfolding catastrophe was the best of the available scenarios.

Had Israel cooperated with the panel, it might have begun to learn how to prevent another war like this one, and how to fight future wars entirely differently. Only now, with the shock beginning to subside, have Israeli military and legal officials begun publicly to concede that battling the Goldstone panel was a colossal blunder.

Burston here also propounds an unpopular idea in Israeli circles, that the Gaza siege is as much a blunder as the war itself was.  And this argument segues into the most important point of his column–that the war has led inexorably to the current attack on Israeli democracy and the peace movement:

And it is this Israeli government, in continuing its siege of Gaza, in denying Gazans access to concrete and other materials needed to rebuild homes destroyed by Israeli fire during Cast Lead, that lends further credence to the Goldstone Report’s suspicions that Israel’s policy has been and continues to be one of collective punishment of a civilian population.

Despite the nightmarish numbers of civilians killed in Gaza, the right has argued again and again that the problem with the war was that it was not pursued aggressively enough. Now, at home, they are getting their way. Finally, the war is being pressed to the full – with peace activists and human rights workers as the primary targets.

The Dahiya Doctrine of overkill and unimaginable, unremitting force, is being applied against the elements of Israeli society most strongly defending democracy and elemental rights. Finally, the war at home is being run the way the right wants. No holds barred. A fresh new onslaught on democracy every single day.

And if his thundering column had ended with the following passage I would’ve called it a masterwork of decency and humanity:

The Goldstone Report is, indeed, deeply flawed. But it is exactly what Israel needs. A deeply flawed report for a deeply flawed country. A country which will not, and cannot, begin to heal itself, repair itself, right itself, unless it faces with honesty and courage the issues and allegations raised by the report.

As long as Israel ducks the report, and keeps buried the whole truth about Cast Lead, it will not recover from this state of shock. Israel will be more vulnerable than ever to destruction from within.

But alas, he didn’t.  And this goes to my criticism of Burston, where he seems to lose the courage of his convictions and lapses into standard anti-Palestinian rhetoric:

Gaza, ruled by a Hamas which wants to see Israel exterminated – and which has only grown richer, better armed, and more popular as a result of the Israeli embargo – will continue to hold the whole of Israel in a crippling, withering, ultimately destructive state of siege.

The notion that Hamas wants Israel exterminated is a beloved trope of the very Israeli right Burston has spent this entire column deriding.  I have no problem with criticizing Hamas.  But if you want to do that you have a responsibility to do it accurately and precisely.  And this anti-Hamas slur is neither accurate nor fair.  But I do very much like Burston’s closing image of a Hamas which, by the very nature of Israel’s siege of Gaza, holds Israel under siege as well.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Dershowitz Calls Goldstone ‘Evil,’ ‘Traitor to Jews;’ Shin Bet Urges NIF Investigation

Sunday, January 31st, 2010

Israeli far-right goes 'Der Shturmer' on Naomi Hazan in Jerusalem Post ad.

I’ve never felt this more than tonight.  There is deep evil afoot among elements of the IDF, Shin Bet, and in the halls of hasbara represented by Alan Dershowitz and the like.  Much of it revolves around the hysterical reaction by the Israeli military and political elite to the Goldstone Report.  We knew all this before.  But the attacks have never been so vicious as those of the past few days, bordering on incitement to violence.  The phrases being voiced remind me of the environment just before Yitzchak Rabin was assassinated by the same type of rabid Israeli nationalist as the ones calling for blood from Israeli peace activists.  I know many of us have been critical of the Israeli left and the peace movement.  I remain so.  But it is now time to pick whichever portion of the Israeli left we can most support and do so wholeheartedly.  The Israeli left is under attack as never before.

Two developments in particular have chilled me to the bone, and I thank Jerry Haber for posting about Dershowitz’s latest eruption and Didi Remez for posting about the IDF’s machinations against Prof. Naomi Hazan and New Israel Fund.  And I urge you after reading this to do everything in your power to support the forces under assault.  Make contributions to New Israel Fund.  Send messages of support to Prof. Hazan.  Call your local Israeli consulate to complain about the assaults on her and Justice Goldstone.  This must stop.

I do not have a problem with anyone whether right or left expressing their views on the issues.  It is good to criticize Goldstone or New Israel Fund if you feel they’ve got things wrong.  But it is dead wrong to call your opponent “evil” or use Der Sturmer tactics to turn your opponent into a subhuman (note the rhino horn on Prof. Hazan’s head in the graphic I’ve posted here–the Hebrew word for “Fund” is the same as “horn,” which explains the rather foolish-looking horn on her head).

We MUST turn the conversation away from this assault and back on the substance of the Goldstone Report.  We must support the UN process outlined in Goldstone which could bring the report for consideration by the Security Council and International Court of Justice if the Israelis and Hamas refuse to investigate their misdeeds.  This is where attention needs to be.  And not on accusations of treason and other McCarthyite red herrings.

Please spend time reading the articles linked here and listening to the Dershowitz radio interview and disseminate this as widely as possible with the added message that we will not take our eyes off the ball that is Goldstone.  We will stand by our allies in Israel and outside it when they are under attack.

Alan Dershowitz gave a radio interview to Israeli army radio, Galey Tzahal, in which he launched a full frontal attack on Justice Goldstone.  Keep in mind that the Israeli officials discussing whether and how to create the least effective investigative panel that would satisfy the Goldstone conditions have bandied about the name of this thug as a potential member of the panel.  Here are some of the interview’s key passages:

D: The Goldstone Report is a defamation written by an evil, evil man.  Goldstone is an evil man.  No one should mince words about it.  He allowed his Jewishness, the fact that his name is Goldstone, and that he has connections to Israel–he allowed himself to be used to give…a heksher, a certification of purity to a defamation.

It would be as if the Czar when he wrote the Protocols of the Elders of Zion he asked a prominent to Jew to edit the report and sign the Protocols in order to show that it had credibility.

Galey Tzahal: Do you hint Prof. Dershowitz that he is a moser, someone who betrays his own people?

D: Absolutely.  There is a prayer that is said every day for people like him: La-malshinim al t’hi tikvah (“there shall be no hope for the betrayers”).  He is a man who uses his language, his words against the Jewish people.  I regarded him as a friend.  I now regard his as an absolute traitor.

Eyal Nir, on my Facebook page makes a perceptive comment (Hebrew) about the Protocols: either Dershowitz is claiming that the Protocols were based on true testimony or he’s claiming that Goldstone is the same type of fraud as the Protocols.  Perhaps Dersh wants us the believe Cast Lead never happened or all those Gazan civilians didn’t die?  Can anyone doubt this man is a charlatan?

Later in the interview Dershowitz says he hasn’t been asked to serve on the committee.  With mock modesty he ventured Justice Aharon Barak as a better candidate for the panel.  Jerry Haber points out that when the Goldstone Report was first issued Defense Minister Barak approached Dershowitz and Barak to spearhead the campaign in Israel’s defense.  You can see what Dersh’s reply was.  Barak refused.  And given this performance, how likely does anyone think it will be for Aharon Barak to answer this tainted call to serve?

If you understand Hebrew, also listen to the remainder of the interview with Shulamit Aloni who savages Dershowitz, calling him a “patriot nutcase” and Ehud Barak, saying she believes he deliberately wanted to kill Gaza civilians during Cast Lead.  She also calls him “the most dangerous man in Israel” and a “Napoleon” (which is rendered even funnier by the fact that Barak is quite short).

Didi Remez translates part of the story by Maariv’s Ben Caspit which reveals that the Knesset’s foreign affairs and security committee will deliberate about New Israel Fund’s alleged role in collaborating with the Goldstone Report by passing incriminating IDF documents to it, thereby blackening Israel’s name in the process.  These documents were forwarded to the Attorney General by the Shin Bet, requesting an investigation be launched.

In an earlier story on the affair, Caspit writes this incendiary claptrap about NIF (as reported in Noam Sheizaf’s blog post):

“Israel’s image is at an all-times low. International pressure is mounting, and with it the calls for boycott. All this was fueled by the Goldstone report, which was in itself fueled by Israeli sources. The funding for these sources is provided by, amongst others, the NIF. The question is whether the New Israeli Fund is indeed for Israel.”

Caspit mentions 300 grassroots and social organizations receiving funds through the NIF, and asks: “is all this activity just intended to serve as a front for radical subversive activity, acting against the very foundations of the state?”

Other Knesset members are proposing ending cooperation between all government agencies and NIF grantees (NIF funds various social justice, human rights and anti-poverty NGOs and initiatives in Israeli Jewish and Arab communities).

Far-right Israeli nationalists protest outside Naomi Hazan's home. Placards say: "Love Naomi--Hate Tzahal" (Flash 90)

The far-right nationalist group, Im Tirtzu, is campaigning against NIF and Naomi Hazan, its Israeli chair, placing the ad displayed here in the Jerusalem Post.  The Israeli right have demonstrated outside Hazan’s home dressed in in mock Hamas kefiyes and thanking her for her support.

Here are some of the shenanigans the Israeli right and intelligence services have planned for NIF:

..The materials exposed…are familiar to the IDF authorities and the legal authorities in Israel. Some of them were given half a year ago to the Military Advocate General Brig. Gen. Avichai Mandelblit.He checked the material and gave it to the Atty. Gen., with a recommendation to open an official investigation. No such investigation has been made so far. The Shin Bet is also familiar with the material and the sensitive issue. Taking action against this is not simple because NIF is a registered association in the US. Also, it is noteworthy that a large part of the fund’s activities in Israel are devoted to social and public issues of the first order.

“It will be hard to connect this activity to political subversion,” said a security source, who is well familiar with the affair. “But on the other hand, there is clearly a worrisome pattern here that is causing Israel serious damage and helping its worst critics tie the IDF’s hands and undermine the legitimacy of the Jewish state in general and its right to defend itself in particular.”

Im Tirtzu is now planning to launch a large public campaign, both against the New Israel Fund in general and personally against its head, Prof. Naomi Hazan. Dozens of movement activists demonstrated last night in front of Hazan’s house dressed up as Hamas activists and carried signs thanking Hazan and the fund.

For the past few months and until tonight, I’d broken off contact and support for NIF over the treatment of fellow blogger, Shamai Leibowitz several years ago.  Since Ben Caspit played an instrumental role in this affair as a conduit of the Shin Bet in smearing Shamai, it’s appropriate to bring it up now.  Shamai came to the U.S. to study international human rights and receive a law degree from George Washington University.  He came with the support of an NIF fellowship.  Leibowitz taught a State Department language, culture and politics course for new U.S. diplomats being sent to Israel.  That is, he taught the course until Aipac found out about it and conveyed this information to the Israeli government, which in turn leaked the information to Caspit, who published it as a juicy piece of gossip: defender of convicted terrorist Marwan Barghouti teaching U.S. diplomats about Israeli culture.  You get the drift.  Shamai lost the job.

Later, Shamai made a speech endorsing the BDS movement in Cambridge which was also reported back to the powers that be in Israel.  Such pressure was exerted that NIF dropped Shamai from the program.  When I learned of this I was so angry I wrote to the then NIF director, Larry Garber, berating him for his betrayal of Shamai.  He never responded.  That’s when I cut my ties to NIF.

But as far as I’m concerned, the Israeli power structure is out to castrate NIF and I simply won’t allow it to happen.  It’s all hands on deck.  Do not let this ship go down.

Those of you who follow the Israeli media closely should note the role that Ben Caspit is playing in this little escapade.  Some journalists’ interests are so closely allied with the security services their salaries might as well be paid by them.  Caspit is one such.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE