Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘muzzlewatch’

Muzzlewatch-JTA Mutual Admiration Society

Wednesday, December 19th, 2007

Don’t get me wrong here. I like Muzzlewatch. I really do. And I understand that Muzzlewatch is different than Tikun Olam. It is the voice of Jewish Voice for Peace. As such it represents an organizational agenda where my blog represents a personal agenda.

JVP’s website’s weekly newsletter notes with pride that Ami Eden, JTA’s managing editor, would’ve included Cecilie Surasky, Muzzlewatch’s editor in the Forward’s Famous 50 list. I know as outsiders we Jewish progressives are all hankering to influence the mainstream political debate. We’re looking for that good word confirming that what we do impacts the mainstream. Hell, I’m even guilty of that myself. So I know how good it must’ve felt to JVP to get his praise. It means that maybe JVP could leverage such approbation to penetrate a wider audience–to get its voice heard by more people.

I mean it would be great to get onto the list–though you would share it with the likes of Michael Mukasey, Norman Podhoretz, Abe Foxman, Alan Dershowitz, Howard Kohr, Sheldon Adelson, Peter Deutsch (founder of the nation’s first “Jewish” public school), David Brog (Christians United for Israel), Charles Jacobs (David Project), Rita Katz (SITE Institute, anti-Muslim anti-terror group), Ronald Lauder, Michael Steinhardt, and Shlomo Cunin (Chabad). But I can’t help feeling awkward about Muzzelwatch basking in Ami Eden’s praise.

After all, this is the same JTA that published Mort Klein’s fake Desmond Tutu quote that supposedly equated Israel with Hitler. The same Ami Eden who called me a liar because I rightly noted that JTA had not apologized for smearing Tutu’s name. The same JTA which quoted a Maariv report which fraudulently claimed that Hamas called for the elimination of Jews from Palestine and never bothered to correct the report. The same JTA which couldn’t manage to find a single source to defend Danny Rubinstein’s use of the term apartheid to describe Israel’s Occupation policy. The same JTA which recycled fraudulent claims about the research of Barnard tenure candidate Nadia Abu El Haj and again couldn’t manage to find a single source to interview who would defend her. The same JTA which published a Ron Kampeas story about the Walt-Mearsheimer book asking whether they were “on drugs” when they wrote it.

It is really tempting to see Ami Eden’s comment as an indicator that Muzzlewatch has heft in the mainstream Jewish media. And it would be great news if this were so. But given JTA’s spotty (to say the least) journalistic record under Ami Eden–a record that predated him to be fair–the praise would give me as much pause as pleasure.

Scandals at Shalem Center; Pro-Israel Academic Partisanship at George Washington University

Friday, November 30th, 2007

I just plain don’t feel much like writing a full blown post today. But I’ve been reading some terrific material at other blogs and would like to point you to some important reading.

First, Muzzlewatch reports on the odd development at George Washington University of an Israeli visiting instructor quitting in a huff when her students (some Jewish) accused her of being a pro-Israel partisan instead of a dispassionate academic. It seems that the University has accepted funding for several positions (including this one) from a foundation run by notorious pro-Israel ideologue and former AIPAC staffer, Mitchell Bard.

Jerry Haber does some terrific sleuthing to discover that Hannah Diskin, the instructor in question, is not affiliated with the Hebrew University as the original Washington Jewish Week story contends. Rather, she is affiliated with the West Bank’s Ariel College, an unaccredited Israeli institution.

I would like to know who are the sugar daddies funding Bard’s academic positions. Could it be that they might be AIPAC megadonors, which would mean that AIPAC is surreptitiously (and indirectly of course) attempting to slant the teching of Israel and Zionism in the college classroom. Perhaps a view of the Foundation’s IRS 990 form might tell us something on that score (I haven’t done this yet).

Sol Salbe links to another terrific piece of investigative journalism by Daphna Berman (who broke the Other Israel Film Festival story recently) in Haaretz. She investigates a juicy scandal simmering at the Shalem Center, home of American-Jewish neocon demi-god and Wall Street Journal darling, Michael Oren. After reading this, it seems to me that Shalem is nothing more than a warmed over version of the Hudson Institute. The most riveting fact (besides the inter-office sex and director’s directives about the precise angle at which to staple reports) in this expose is the worship by the three Shalem founders of Meir Kahane during their college days at Princeton. How can such an institution command any respect with this intellectual/political pedigree?

I just read Jerry Haber’s recap of this article and he has one hilarious comment on the hot sex at Shalem:

Of course, there is the usual nepotism associated with family businesses. Yoram’s brother, David, worked there for twelve years in an executive position…until he was forced to leave because of an affair he conducted with one of his subordinates. (At the time he was working on a book on the Ten Commandments – or maybe, for him, the Nine)

The Forward Covers Tikun Olam Story on Harassment of Jewish Progressives

Thursday, February 8th, 2007

This blog has been mentioned in the New York Times (OK, it was just the real estate blog–but still), the Financial Times, and other publications. But today’s coverage in The Forward really means a lot to me. Both because it is a publication I generally respect a great deal. And because its independent-minded Jewish audience is precisely the type of readers I’m trying to reach here.

Rebecca Spence wrote a penetrating article about the assault on liberal Jews by American Jewish organizations. In it, she covers a blog post I wrote about Adam Horowitz, who does Mideast peace work for AFSC in Philadelphia. Adam was subject to what I call the Rowen Taylor harpie treatment (and lest you accuse me of overdoing it–this is the same person who accused Jimmy Carter of “being in cahoots with Islamofascists”). Here’s how Spence describes it:

Privately, left-wing Jewish activists say they have been the targets of acts designed to intimidate them. Tikun Olam, a liberal Jewish blog, reported that an anonymous e-mail message was sent last spring to Adam Horowitz, an employee of the American Friends Service Committee — which has strongly condemned Israeli policy — with the subject line “Why do you hate being a Jew, why are you in favor of murdering Jews?” According to the blog, Horowitz discovered that the e-mail had been sent by Allyson Rowen Taylor, who is the new associate director of Stand With Us, a pro-Israel advocacy organization active on California campuses. At the time that the message was sent, Taylor was an assistant regional director at the West Coast office of the AJCongress.

In an interview with the Forward, Taylor confirmed that she had indeed sent the message. “I shouldn’t have done it,” she said. “But the things they were saying were so disgusting that I basically lashed out.” Taylor explained that she had been monitoring some of Horowitz’s e-mail chats without his knowledge. She also said that she sent the message from her personal account and did not do so in the name of any organization.

What the hell does this mean: “She had been monitoring some of Horowitz’s e mail chats without his knowledge?” Sounds to me like someone Horowitz was e-mailing bcc’ed Rowen Taylor to include her in the loop of the conversation. Very naughty Allyson.

Yesterday, I interviewed Gary Ratner, west coast AJ Congress director about the Horowitz-Rowen Taylor exchange. He used to be the latter’s boss. I asked him if he approved of what she’d written and done. “Absolutely not,” he replied. I asked him if she wrote the e mail from work. He said, “She couldn’t have done this more than once or twice before I’d find out about it.” I think he was trying to say that he kept a pretty close lid on that sort of behavior and thought it highly unlikely she would’ve done so. But he did leave the interpretation open to the possibility that Rowen Taylor might’ve engaged in some of this sort of harassing behavior while at work. And I assure you that someone like Rowen Taylor does not just harass a single person. She’s probably a serial harasser. All Ratner has to do is check the logs of her e mails to find out if he’s interested.

And on a related matter, I queried Ratner about AJ Congress’ involvement with the Israel Campus Coalition (the group which recently voted not to expel the Union of Progressive Zionists for hosting an Israeli refusenik tour). He and Rowen Taylor penned a resignation letter to ICC which was later rescinded by AJC’s national director. Ratner told me that AJ Congress may still resign. But that if it did so, it would resign for a different reason. Instead of blaming the ICC for not expelling UPZ, AJ Congress will be examining whether its involvement with ICC “coincides with AJC’s goals as an organization.” If it doesn’t, then AJC will leave. I pointed out to him that the public might wonder why the explanation for the departure would’ve changed so dramatically. He replied by saying people will always doubt what you do or say.

I think there is one enormous benefit to articles like Spence’s. There used to be such homogeneity of thinking in American Jewish organizations that such behavior might’ve been either tacitly or overtly accepted. But now that Jewish publications and progressive Jewish blogs like Muzzlewatch are taking Jewish communal staff like Rowen Taylor to task, they must begin to realize that they are accountable. By this, I mean not just accountable to their lay boards which agree with their behavior in any event. They are also accountable to Jews who read about their actions in blogs or the media. They are accountable to a much broader slice of Jewish public opinion. They will have to clean house or risk being “called out” for such shenanigans.

This story is yet another example of the power of blogs to democratize communities. Thanks to Muzzlewatch (thanks again Cecilie!)–where I first read about this story–and Tikun Olam, people who cross over the line in assaulting their fellow Jews for their opinions will be having to watch what they do and say more carefully.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE