Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘Mideast Peace’

Branson on Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: ‘Something Ghastly Could Happen’

Thursday, August 27th, 2009

From the department of understatement:

“As human beings, all of us wish to see a resolution,” he [Richard Branson] said about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. “Because if you don’t have a resolution, I think something ghastly could happen one day…

Haaretz

One day?  Try TODAY.  Wake up Mr. B.,  the ‘ghastly’ happens every day.  You just don’t have an opportunity to see it.  Maybe you should try to spend a day in Gaza or waiting at a checkpoint.

But I should at least give Branson credit for traveling to Israel and the West Bank with the Elders (which includes Nelson Mandela, Desmond Tutu, Jimmy Carter, and Mary Robinson among others) and for funding their efforts.

Yaalon Looks to Fascist Right for Support in Likud Leadership Struggle

Thursday, August 20th, 2009

Bibi Netanyahu is facing no particular internal political threat (though he faces an external one in the shape of Barack Obama), yet his competitors for Likud party leadership are still jockeying for position.  Bogie Yaalon, former IDF chief of staff and current minister of strategic affairs, sees himself as a future prince of the Likud.  To become party leader, he apparently sees his best chance by allying himself with fascist right.  That’s why he spoke at an event this week honoring Moshe Feiglin, leader of the Manhigut Yehudit far right faction of the party.  In case you’re wondering where to place Feiglin on the political spectrum, think an amalgam of Geert Wilders, Meir Kahane, Jean Marie Le Pen and Jorge Haider:

Here is but a single statement out of many that I could offer:

“Hitler was an unparalleled military genius. Nazism promoted Germany from a low to a fantastic physical and ideological status. The ragged, trashy youth body turned into a neat and orderly part of society and Germany received an exemplary regime, a proper justice system and public order. Hitler savored good music. He would paint. This was no bunch of thugs. They merely used thugs and homosexuals.”

Feiglin’s views are so extreme that the British foreign office declared him persona non grata there, meaning he can’t fundraise among his fellow British Kahanists.

Here is a selection of Yaalon’s more offensive statements at the event:

“I, for one, am not afraid of the Americans,” Ya’alon said in the speech, which was reported by Channel 2′s Amit Segal. “I believe that Jews have the right to live anywhere in the land of Israel forever.”

In the speech, Ya’alon also denounced the power of the press and other “elites” in Israel to make or break politicians and lashed out at the extreme Left. He also called Peace Now “a virus.”

Feiglin praised Ya’alon at the rally and committed to him the support of Feiglin’s Manhigut Yehudit ideological forum in Likud, which has become increasingly powerful in the party’s institutions. That support could aid Ya’alon in an eventual run to lead the party.

Most observers of Israeli politics will not be surprised at any of this. Likud has long been the home of some of the most stridently nationalist politicians in the country. But it is still somewhat unusual for a Likud party leader to support overtly those who ardently espouse the political views of Meir Kahane.  After all, while he was alive the man was considered persona non grata and practically a Jewish terrorist by most of the nation.

This development indicates to me that had Kahane lived he would not be in jail, but rather a minister in the current government and a potential Likud party leader. Those who care about Israel must be alarmed by the alliances made by politicians such as Yaalon.  We are rapidly losing the Israel some of us once knew.  It is being replaced by a state lapsing into proto-fascism.

Obama Meets With Jewish Leaders, Tells Off Hoenlein

Monday, July 13th, 2009

I’ve been waiting years for this to happen. Barack Obama for the first time in his administration met with the leaders of fourteen Jewish organizations including Peace Now, J Street and Israeli Policy Forum in order to reassure American Jewish leaders that his settlement freeze policy was ultimately “good for Israel.” When it came time to take questions, the most hostile ones came from Malcolm Hoenlein, resident nyetnik of the Conference of Presidents. Here’s how the N.Y. Times described the encounter:

…Some of the toughest questioning of Mr. Obama came from Malcolm Hoenlein, executive vice chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations…Mr. Hoenlein told the president that diplomatic progress in the Middle East has traditionally occurred when there is “no light” between the positions of the United States and Israel. But Mr. Obama pushed back, citing the administration of his predecessor, George W. Bush.

“He said, ‘I disagree,’ ‘’ said Marla Gilson, director of the Washington action office of Hadassah, the women’s Zionist organization. “He said, ‘For eight years, there was no light between the United States and Israel, and nothing got accomplished.’

For far too long Hoenlein’s narischkeit has passed for commonly accepted pro-Israel wisdom in our community. Finally, finally a president is pushing back. Malcom Hoenlein no longer owns the discourse. There Shehecheyanu prayer says: “Thank God who has kept me alive and allowed me to reach this day.”  Amen to that.

It’s interesting that Haaretz reporter Barak Ravid’s report of the meeting listed the attendees and included no mention of the Jewish peace groups I listed above. This speaks volumes for certain elements of the establishment Jewish press (or at least reporters like Ravid) who haven’t yet rolled over and heard the news that the old days of hard-right pro-Israel groups representing the “entire” Jewish people are over. There are a few new kids on the block. Obama himself knows and understands this, which is why he invited them. Some journalists are slow to catch on.

IDF Kidnaps U.S. Citizens, Nobel Laureate in Gaza Waters

Tuesday, June 30th, 2009

Let anyone who claims there is no difference between a Likud or Kadima government take note of Israel’s act of piracy on the high seas today when it surrounded an unarmed former ferry carrying 23 human rights activists (including a former U.S. Congresswoman, a Nobel laureate and 21 others) and humanitarian aid to Gaza.  In similar past circumstances, the Olmert government allowed several such ships to dock in Gaza with their humanitarian cargo.  The ship seized earlier today was attempting to break Israel’s siege against Gaza, which itself is a violation of international law.

All American citizens, whether you agree with the politics involved or not should be outraged by this violation of the norms of international and maritime conduct.  American officials should be demanding that its four citizens be released immediately.  Israel had no right to intercept this ship, nor to impound it or detain its passengers.  It has no right to forcibly transfer them to Israeli territory.

The Free Gaza Movement released this statement by former Rep. McKinney:

“This is an outrageous violation of international law against us. Our boat was not in Israeli waters, and we were on a human rights mission to the Gaza Strip,” said Cynthia McKinney, a former U.S. Congresswoman and presidential candidate. “President Obama just told Israel to let in humanitarian and reconstruction supplies, and that’s exactly what we tried to do. We’re asking the international community to demand our release so we can resume our journey.”

And Nobel Laureate Mairead Maguire made the following protest:

“The aid we were carrying is a symbol of hope for the people of Gaza, hope that the sea route would open for them, and they would be able to transport their own materials to begin to reconstruct the schools, hospitals and thousands of homes destroyed during the onslaught of “Cast Lead”. Our mission is a gesture to the people of Gaza that we stand by them and that they are not alone” said fellow passenger Mairead Maguire, winner of a Noble Peace Prize for her work in Northern Ireland.

I should add that the Israeli navy will impound the ship in order to inhibit the future work on the FGM.  Pressure must be exerted to get Israel to release the ship undamaged (it is highly likely that Israel will render the ship inoperable or permanently crippled if it ever does return it).

FGM suggests that those who wish to help may contact the following:

CONTACT the Israeli Ministry of Justice
tel: +972 2646 6666 or +972 2646 6340
fax: +972 2646 6357

CONTACT the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs
tel: +972 2530 3111
fax: +972 2530 3367

CONTACT Mark Regev in the Prime Minister’s office at:
tel: +972 5 0620 3264 or +972 2670 5354
mark.regev@it.pmo.gov.il

CONTACT the International Committee of the Red Cross to ask for their assistance in establishing the wellbeing of the kidnapped human rights workers and in securing their immediate release!

Red Cross Israel
tel: +972 3524 5286
fax: +972 3527 0370
tel_aviv.tel@icrc.org

Red Cross Switzerland:
tel: +41 22 730 3443
fax: +41 22 734 8280

Red Cross USA:
tel: +1 212 599 6021
fax: +1 212 599 6009

Bronner Sticks His Foot in It Again

Saturday, June 27th, 2009
Israeli anti-Occupation activist, Ezra Nawi builds shelter for Palestinian villagers (Rina Castelnuovo/NYT)

Israeli anti-Occupation activist, Ezra Nawi, builds shelter for Palestinian villagers (Rina Castelnuovo/NYT)

I don’t know what it is with Ethan Bronner, the NY Times’ Israel correspondent. He’s clearly intelligent. He knows the issues fairly well. But his problem is he’s conflict about the politics of the Middle East. With a child in the IDF and married to an Israeli it’s almost as if he has to pull his punches [correction: Ethan Bronner denies he has a son in the IDF and I can't for the life of me remember where I read this. So I stand corrected on this particular matter and apologize to Bronner and Phil Weiss, who picked this up from here. But Bronner's wife IS Israeli.]

It’s not that he’s a horrible journalist. After all, as I said he’s articulate and intelligent and knows the issues. But rather than come right out and say something definitive, he beats around the bush and tempers his judgments. He wants everyone to like him and is shocked when many don’t.

The thing that irks me most about his reporting is that he ALWAYS manages to include a real howler in almost every major report that he writes. It usually something so condescending toward the Israeli peace movement or the Palestinians or something so twisted or distorted that it leaves you scratching your head how an otherwise intelligent human being can say something so out there, so…dumb.

In today’s report, he chose a worthy subject in Israeli peace activist Ezra Nawi, who has “adopted” the Palestinian villages of the south Hebron Hills, defending them from the marauding neighboring settlers. In addition, Ezra does come up for sentencing on Wednesday so the scrutiny on Israeli justice from a major U.S. media outlet is quite welcome.  Please sign this Jewish Voice for Peace petition to pressure Israeli authorities to end this sham judicial process.  For more on Nawi’s case, see this report by Neve Gordon.

But it’s as if he somehow has to mollify his right-wing readers in choosing such a progressive topic that he adds the following howler:

Since the Israeli left lost so much popular appeal after the violent Palestinian uprising of 2000 and the Hamas electoral victory in Gaza three years ago, its activists tend to be a rarefied bunch — professors of Latin or Sanskrit, and translators of medieval poetry. Mr. Nawi, however, is a plumber.

A note before I go on: later in this story he DOES quote an Israeli peace activist, David Shulman, who IS a professor of Sanskrit at the Hebrew University. But it’s as if this single source has somehow become emblematic of the entire Israeli peace movement. Not just emblematic, but in Bronner’s eyes the entire Israeli left has been reduced to David Shulman. While Prof. Shulman, a leader of Ta’ayush, IS an extraordinary scholar and human being, it is s deep disservice to him and the Israeli left to imply there aren’t many tens of thousands of others doing work equally valuable.

Bronner: have you forgotten about B’Tselem, Gisha, Yesh G’vul, Combatants for Peace, Breaking the Silence, Rabbis for Human Rights, Hadash, Peace Now, the Israeli Committee Against Home Demolitions, Courage to Refuse, Parent’s Circle, Anarchists Against the Wall (just to mention organizations)? And individuals like Uri Avnery, Rabbi Menachem Froman, the Sheministim, Michael Sfard, Jeff Halper, Shulamit Aloni, Robbi Damelin, Yitzchak Frankenthal, Rabbi Arik Ascherman, Dov Kheinin. Are these all nothing but effete European professors of obscure humanist subjects? The very notion is absurd and offensive.

Now, as always with Bronner’s howlers–there is a kernel of truth there. The organized Israeli left has shriveled and failed in a massive way since the first Intifada and especially during the Lebanon and Gaza wars. Note I said the “organized” left. I say this deliberately because Israeli NGOs and individual peace activists are doing work as vital as any done by the Israeli left when it was a more powerful political force. So for Bronner to dismiss the constituency of the Israeli left as he has done is deeply insulting and false.

He owes these courageous groups and individuals an apology. But will they get one? Don’t hold your breath.

David Shulman provides this bit of sad news from the anti-Occupation forces:

Yesterday was a tough day in the Territories…The whole group of some 30 Taayush activists, including 2 Palestinian drivers and some of our Palestinian colleagues, was arrested on arrival at al-Safa to accompany the farmers to their lands. The arrests were carried out [by the IDF] very brutally, there was one broken leg and one apparently broken arm.

As far as the IDF and the Occupation goes, plus ca change plus la meme chose. Oh I forgot, that’s going to mark me as yet another effete western intellectual do-gooder.

Obama in Ankara: ‘Jews Have to See Palestinian Perspective’

Tuesday, April 7th, 2009

I’ve never felt prouder of being a blogger than in writing this post.  I’ve never felt prouder of being an American.  In my entire life, this country has never had a president who made me entirely proud.  Yes, I respected Carter and admired Clinton (politically that is).  But I never felt they entirely represented me or my views.  But Barack Obama has changed all that and I simply can’t adequately describe the feeling.

Maybe you’ll feel that way too after you read this.  It is taken from a conversation Obama held with Jewish, Muslim and Christian students in Ankara just before he left to fly home:

I believe that peace in the Middle East is possible. I think it will be based on two states, side by side: a Palestinian state and a Jewish state. I think in order to achieve that, both sides are going to have to make compromises. I think we have a sense of what those compromises should be and will be. Now what we need is political will and courage on the part of leadership.

…I have to believe that the mothers of Palestinians and the mothers of Israelis hope the same thing for their children. They want them not to be vulnerable to violence. They don’t want, when their child gets on a bus, to worry that that bus might explode. They don’t want their child to have to suffer indignities because of who they are. And so sometimes I think that if you just put the mothers in charge for a while, that things would get resolved.

And it’s that spirit of thinking about the future and not the past that I just talked about earlier that I think could help advance the peace process, because if you look at the situation there, over time I don’t believe it’s sustainable.

It’s not sustainable for Israel’s security because as populations grow around them, if there is more and more antagonism towards Israel, over time that will make Israel less secure.

It’s not sustainable for the Palestinians because increasingly their economies are unable to produce the jobs and the goods and the income for people’s basic quality of life.

So we know that path is a dead end, and we’ve got to move in a new direction. But it’s going to be hard. A lot of mistrust has been built up, a lot of anger, a lot of hatred. And unwinding that hatred requires patience.

…But it will depend on young people like you being open to new ideas and new possibilities. And it will require young people like you never to stereotype or assume the worst about other people.In the Muslim world, this notion that somehow everything is the fault of the Israelis lacks balance — because there’s two sides to every question. That doesn’t mean that sometimes one side has done something wrong and should not be condemned. But it does mean there’s always two sides to an issue.

I say the same thing to my Jewish friends, which is you have to see the perspective of the Palestinians. Learning to stand in somebody else’s shoes to see through their eyes, that’s how peace begins. And it’s up to you to make that happen.

As bloggers, we expound on issues, we critique, we interpret.  This is one of the first times as a blogger when I simply didn’t think I could add anything that wasn’t in the original.  Read it and enjoy!  For more coverage of this story and its background, read the Jerusalem Post.

On a related matter, the Obama administration has begun briefing Democratic congressmembers telling them to expect a confrontation with the new Netanyahu government over the direction of the peace process:

In an unprecedented move, the Obama administration is readying for a possible confrontation with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by briefing Democratic congressmen on the peace process and the positions of the new government in Israel regarding a two-state solution. The Obama administration is expecting a clash with Netanyahu over his refusal to support the establishment of a Palestinian state alongside Israel.

In recent weeks, American officials have…prepared the ground for the possibility of disagreements with Israel over the peace process, according to information recently received. The preemptive briefing is meant to foil the possibility that Netanyahu may try to bypass the administration by rallying support in Congress.

Once again, this is a development that is unheard of.  Presidents simply don’t telegraph these sorts of things in advance to the Israelis and Aipac and their diehard supporters in Congress.  Usually presidents prefer to pretend that all’s well and there can never be a divide between them and the Israelis.

The only comparable situation I can think of is George H.W. Bush and Jim Baker, who really put Yitzchak Shamir’s feet to the fire (and he didn’t like it one goddamn bit) leading up to the Madrid conference.  That made for some very cool relations between the two nations for quite some time.

I think it’s imperative that Obama, in disagreeing with Netanyahu, needs to appeal over his head to the Israeli people (just as Netanyahu will attempt to do the reverse here) and American Jews.  The president needs to act both here and in Israel as if he is the nation’s best friend and that it is Netanyahu who is the obdurate one.  It is Bibi who endangers his own people with his policies.  While Obama wants only what is best (and fair) for Israel.

For the first time in a generation, it is clear that the only way to bring peace is by exerting pressure on an Israeli government to compromise.  The U.S. will need to get the EU on board as this needs to be a coordinated strategy.  Netanyahu cannot be allowed to play various nations, blocs and constituencies off against each other.  He must see that wherever he turns everyone wants him to make peace.  No one must give him an “out.”

In another dramatic parting from the policies of the Bush administration, Obama has let it be known that the U.S. has no objection to a Hamas-Fatah unity government.  Of course, this is mitigated by the fact that the U.S. is still insisting that Hamas recognize Israel before the former will accept Hamas within such a government.  But progress happens in small increments.  You’ll recall that the Bushites objected so strongly to the Hamas-led P.A. that it sent David Welch to foment an armed rebellion by Fatah against Hamas.  This led to the latter’s Gaza counter-coup.  Thank God, there will be no such shenanigans in the coming four years.

Apparently, another development we will not see is an Israeli attack on Iran, at least according to Joe Biden:

In the [CNN] interview, Biden was asked whether he was concerned that Netanyahu might strike Iranian nuclear facilities.

“I don’t believe Prime Minister Netanyahu would do that. I think he would be ill advised to do that,” Biden said.  “And so my level of concern is no different than it was a year ago.”

My God, I feel we’ve hit a political trifecta: a president who “gets” the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, is willing to pressure Israel (and the Palestinians) to get to peace, and who will not allow Israel to embroil itself in a military adventure against Iran.  Pinch me–I must be dreaming!

Support Peace and Justice: Give Tzedakah

Saturday, December 13th, 2008

It’s coming on Hanukah and the end of the year and some folks out there haven’t yet had their net worth zeroed out by the Wall Street collapse.  For those of you who do give at the end of the year for tax purposes or whatever other reason, I’m making my end of year tzedakah suggestions.  These are some of the groups whose work I’ve most admired during the past year.  This list is not meant to be exhaustive or definitive.  There are lots of other great groups working for Mideast peace as well.

Even if you don’t have high net worth, as long as for you giving tzedakah is a Jewish (or human) imperative, I hope you’ll pony up a few shekels to one or more of these groups (and products):

Americans for Peace Now
Parent’s Circle
J Street
Jewish Voice for Peace
Jewish Forward (subscribe)
Israel Coalition Against Home Demolitions
Peace Oil
Jewish Student Press Service
Foundation for Ethnic Understanding
Jews on First
Shministim
New Israel Fund
Birthright Unplugged

Give and give generously.  We may be nearer than we have been in decades to a comprehensive Israeli-Arab peace.  To get there, besides the vision of Israeli, Arab and U.S. politicians, we need the push of NGOs and non-profits willing to stick their necks out to promote change.  Do what you can.  They can’t do it without you.

And if I might shamelessly hold out my own hand too, please consider hitting that Paypal button to support my own efforts here at Tikun Olam.  Today, the Jerusalem Post devoted an entire article to slamming my most recent Comment is Free about the Mumbai attack on Chabad House.  I’ve arrived!  They even quoted me accurately and extensively (along with my detractors of course).  I “sparked a furor” (according to JPost) among the Jewish right.  Imagine that.  So if that’s a fight worth fighting I hope you’ll make your stand with me.

Jonathan Tobin’s Fever Dream of Jewish Leftist Revolution

Friday, December 5th, 2008

My goodness, Jonathan Tobin, rightist pro-Israel editor of the Philadelphia Jewish Exponent says in The Forward that M.J. Rosenberg is a brazen vulgarian.  I’m sure M.J. will never live this down.  I guess being that Tobin edits a newspaper, he must not spend much time on the internet or he would understand that the phrase “stick it up their ass” is considered fairly benign discourse.  Of course, it wouldn’t be considered civil in the Jewish Exponent nor would M.J. write anything like that there if Tobin would accept him for publication (which is doubtful).  Nor would M.J. write any such thing at the Israel Policy Forum website.  But Tobin seems to have missed the distinction between online discourse–and the fact that M.J. maintains a personal blog at TPMCafe, where he wrote this–and other media forms.  It wouldn’t be the first time that the Jewish mainstream media turned tone deaf when it came to understanding the web.

Here’s another news flash from Tobin to his right wing pro-Israel allies:

…A portion of the Jewish left believes Obama’s victory will mean the pursuit of policies that will lead to a confrontation with many of Israel’s supporters.

Goodness gracious!  Tobin’s telling us that if Obama pursues an Israeli-Arab peace agenda he’ll come face to face with Aipac, Bibi, and…Jonathan Tobin.  The horror.  I’m sure that Obama will find them an immovable wall, a veritable tower of strength in the face of the “existential threat” to Israel represented by this crazy effrontery.

Here’s another “nutty Jewish left-wing” notion Tobin wants to shoot down before it gets wings:

…That peace between Israelis and Palestinians is readily achieved. All it will take is an administration willing to face down any Israeli or American who stands in the way — which, in this view, includes virtually the entire Jewish organizational establishment.

My oh my.  It seems we’ve left out a whole range of Jewish organizations Tobin can’t abide–because they disagree with him: J Street, Brit Tzedek, Peace Now, Israel Policy Forum.  What are they, chopped liver?  You see, in the past they were.  But no longer.  In an Obama administration all the Jewish organizations will get a respectful hearing.  But the above groups are new kids on the block and a force to be reckoned with.  J Street helped elect 30 new Congress members who support a peace agenda.  Aipac, the RJC, and Morrie Amitay wasted their shekels on Republican candidates and got gornisht for their trouble.  Tobin fears that the Israel lobby will be left out in the cold and the J Streeters will be warming themselves by Rahm Emanuel’s office fireplace.  I hope it turns out to be true.

Tobin makes clear that the Israel lobby wants nothing to do with an Obama initiative to resolve the Israeli Arab conflict:

Now, his agenda is to govern and manage a failing economy as well as juggle wars in Iraq and Afghanistan — goals that would hardly be advanced by wantonly picking fights with mainstream Jewish groups in a quixotic quest for a peace deal.

That’s the view of the Jewish right.  Peace is impossible.  There is no Palestinian partner.  Wait till developments are more auspicious in another century or two.  Jonathan, I’ve got news for you.  Obama isn’t using your playbook.  The fact that he wants to make an address in a major Arab capital in his first 100 days in office is bad news for your side.  That indicates that, unlike the current White House resident, this president means business when it comes to negotiating peace.

It may be that he will come down hard on the Israelis and Jonathan isn’t going to like that.  But he will come down equally hard on the Palestinians, all in the pursuit of a real peace.  The Israel lobby doesn’t like that.  But the rest of the reasonable Jews out there will.  And they will support Obama.  In fact, many of us will be cheering such an effort on, while Tobin sits on the sidelines flicking a raspberry.

And dear oh dear, Jonathan is shaking in his boots at the prospect that the “Jewish left” is about to attempt a palace coup to topple the reigning Jewish power brokers at Aipac:

Jewish doves’…long-shot goal is to topple the centrist and bipartisan Aipac as the pro-Israel community’s voice and replace it with voices from the left. Overturning the realities of the Middle East may be beyond their reach, but that’s not going to stop them from trying to “stick it” to anyone who opposes pressuring the Jewish state to do things that its democratically elected leaders may find ill-advised.

“Centrist and bi-partisan?”  It’s the same old song we’ve heard a million times before.  So often, in fact that the needle has gotten stuck in the groove.  Aipac is not centrist by any stretch of the imagination.  And while Democrats participate in Aipac, most Democrats find themselves having a lot more in common with J Street than Aipac.

Contrary to Tobin’s fever dream of leftist revolution, the Jewish peace lobby isn’t out to topple Aipac, even if it could.  There’s plenty of room for all of us.  None of us have to get paranoid and think that anyone’s out to “get” them.  What we’d ask though is that just as we accept the existence of the Israel lobby, that the other side would stop demonizing us and excluding us from the corridors of Jewish power as they consistently do.

On a final note,  it’s unfortunate that Jonathan Tobin’s querulous, out of touch ramblings found a home in the Forward.  They’d be more appropriate at other blatantly right wing sites where he publishes like The Jewish Press, Jewish World Review, and Arutz Sheva.

I was tickled by the unintentional humor in this passage from Tobin’s Wikipedia entry:

Blogger Luke Ford has called Tobin “the most right-wing editor of a Jewish weekly in the US,” but according to Tobin, “I lost my credentials as a real right-winger any number of times because I’ve taken stands on issues they disagree with. I’ve taken shots at the right consistently when I think they’re wrong. More consistently than when my colleagues on the left take shots at the left.”

If Luke Ford calls you “right-wing,” you KNOW you’re right-wing. As for the ratio of times Tobin took shots at the right compared to the times he mouthed right wing platitudes, I’d guess charitably it might be 1,000 to 1.

UPDATE: I’ve just been informed that Tobin will shortly become editor at Commentary Magazine. It was bashert. A match made in heaven. Do you think he’ll keep taking those shots at the right from his perch atop the epitome of Jewish neocon media?? Maybe once in a while he’ll take a shot at the Podhoretz boys or Der Dersh?? Don’t hold your breath.