Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘lisa-goldman’

Juan Cole Wins Brass Crescent Award for Best Non-Muslim Blog

Sunday, December 16th, 2007

Mazel tov to Juan Cole whose Informed Comment won the Brass Crescent Award for Best Non-Muslim Blog. The Brass Crescent competition acknowledges Muslim blogs. Juan has certainly done a great deal to improve the understanding of Islam and and the Muslim world in the blogosphere and beyond, especially through his dogged coverage of the Iraq war and U.S. Middle East policy.

Lisa Goldman won honorable mention in this category, which is a pity.

She recently wrote a Haaretz column about the police investigation of her trips to Lebanon to report there for Israeli TV. Lebanese journalists have been terribly angry at her reporting. The Daily Star attacked her use of a Canadian passport to enter the country and claimed that she endangered any Lebanese who had any contact with her or was interviewed by her during her stay. Nicholas Noe, publisher of the respected MideastWire news service, which is based in Beirut, wrote this to me:

…She put all of us at risk here, which was selfish and unethical… also her reporting was just plain bad, inaccurate etc – as were her subsequent denials, clarifications etc.

Although she does not seem to understand it, there is a war going on – and her government is very much involved as are people and groups here – which is why, perhaps, she is being prosecuted in her country. Indeed, if nothing else, she willfully put the state of Israel at risk.

On an even more basic level though, her risk-taking failed to produce good journalism. If it had, then maybe, maybe even the journalistic community here could at least think her effort was for a greater good. But it wasn’t. For some weak “reporting,” she endangered other peoples’ lives.

Unlike Nicholas, I do not approve of her prosecution by Israeli police. And I admit to not fully understanding all the arcane intricacies of internal Lebanese politics. I can see that she would’ve put people at risk of being seen as Israeli dupes if they participated in any way with her reporting. And such people, in a volatile political environment, could end up threatened or even dead. I can also see that if, God forbid, a militant group HAD kidnapped her we could’ve had another Alan Johnston situation. That indeed would’ve been horrible for Goldman, for Israel and for journalism.

I think the main point Nicholas raises which I agree with is the insipidness of her Lebanon reporting. If you’re going to take a risk, why not do so in a good cause? Say something important. Make some groundbreaking observations or analysis. She did none of this. She wasted whatever opportunity she had to be an Uri Avnery, a bold, iconoclastic journalistic presence challenging both Israeli and Arab political shibboleths. In fact, this was one of her arguments justifying the value of her reporting to the Israeli viewing public:

“Given that so many Israelis expressed pleasant surprise at seeing Beirut as a beautiful, cosmopolitan city rather than a war zone, it is obvious that we are not obtaining an accurate picture of life in Lebanon.”

You mean it took the intrepid Lisa Goldman to make Israelis realize that Beirut is a “beautiful, cosmopolitan city??” If so, then Israelis haven’t been let in a secret that the rest of the world has known for decades. But I doubt most Israelis are as insipid and ignorant about the region they live in as she implies that they are.

And for this she gets a Brass Crescent Honorable Mention and can brag that the Muslim blog world values her blogging?

Congratulations also to Raising Yousuf for winning a Brass Crescent Award in a separate category. Her blog, based in Gaza is always interesting.

Israeli Police Seek to Criminalize Journalism

Saturday, December 8th, 2007

Yesterday, I wrote a somewhat uncharitable post asking people to vote in the Brass Crescent competition for Best Non-Muslim blog. I recommended voting for several blogs and not voting for one in particular. While I don’t take back what I wrote about Lisa Goldman or her blog, I feel chastened by the fact that the Israeli press today revealed that she and two other journalists are being investigated by the Israeli police for reporting from Lebanon. Why should that be you might rightly ask? What’s wrong with Lebanon? Well, it appears that in the twisted minds of some Israeli right-wing politicians and police officials Lebanon is an enemy state and those who visit it are betraying the State in some vague way.

Lisa is one of those journalists. She reported from Lebanon twice for Channel 10. I want to make clear that whatever quarrels I have had with her, I support her right to report from Lebanon and excoriate the Israeli police for attempting to criminalize the profession of journalism. Goldman and the other two reporters were doing what any good reporter would do–finding a good story and telling your audience about it. Lebanon is Israel’s neighbor and therefore an important journalistic story. Israel fought a war against Lebanon in 2006. It is now in the midst of social and political upheaval that could have a great impact on the prospects for peace with Israel. It’s only natural that Israeli reporters go there. Israelis want to know about Lebanon–why shouldn’t they go?

The fact that the Israeli police want to prevent such associations indicates how much certain political echelons within Israel fear rapprochement with Israel’s Arab neighbors. Based on this statement I’m convinced that right-wing politicians leaked reports of the investigation:

Lisa Goldman confirmed…that she had been interrogated a month ago, but expressed great surprise that details of the investigation had emerged, given that the police had told her not to discuss it.

“I have no idea who leaked this story,” she said. “I was completely flabbergasted when an Israeli reporter telephoned me today to inform me that the investigation had been announced…I have no idea who leaked it and very surprised that it’s now been released. The police told me not to discuss the interrogation and I didn’t. Therefore I am very surprised that the matter is now being exposed in the media.”

I did find one aspect of Lisa’s comments about her experience odd though. First, she says she did not realize visiting Lebanon was against the law. She went there on behalf of one of Israel’s main TV stations and no one there realized she was committing a potentially illegal act? I’d feel a whole lot better if she and her bosses HAD realized the legal implications and deliberately decided to go anyway and dared the police to charge them. That’s the sort of thing Uri Avnery and Abie Natan used to do all the time. That was gutsy journalism.

Lisa, on the other hand, told Haaretz that she would never have gone if she’d known it was against the law. That’s one of the problems I have with Lisa as a political blogger. I wish she would’ve said instead if she’d realized it was against the law then “hell yes I would’ve gone anyway.” Instead she seems to be toeing a party line. Now, it could be she was directed by attorneys to respond in this way. In which case she may not feel free to speak her mind. But I’d guess that she was speaking her own mind in trying to “walk back the dog” and say she wouldn’t have gone.

In closing, I wish Lisa well in this fight and we should all be there to back her up. If Israel is a real democracy it should not criminalize the reporting of the news.

Brass Crescent Awards for Best Non-Muslim Blog

Friday, December 7th, 2007

Brass Crescent Awards
Voting for this year’s Brass Crescent Awards ends on December 14th. These are awards bestowed by the Arab-Muslim blogsphere on the best of their own (though voting is open to all regardless of religion). There are some fine blogs nominated with whose authors I have communicated over the years including Akram’s Razor, Raising Yousouf and Aqoul. But the category that interests me most is the Best Non-Muslim Blog (“Which blog writen by a non-Muslim is most respectful of Islam and seeks genuine dialogue with Muslims?). Last year, On the Face won in this category. This blog, written by Israeli-Canadian Lisa Goldman, seems to have a following though I can’t for the life of me understand how any Muslim interested in the Israeli-Arab conflict could vote for it.

Goldman is the editor of Global Voices Israel section in which she regularly features the right-wing anti-Palestinian blogger, Aussie Dave. [Note: It appears that Goldman has not contributed a post to GV in a year--so she may no longer be the Israel section editor.] She doesn’t offer any Israeli Arab blogs, nor does she offer such wonderful progressive Israeli blogs as Yudit Ilany’s OCCUPIED or Robert Rosenberg’s Ariga.com, which was historically probably the first Israeli blog. That could be because Robert didn’t offer her a job at Haaretz when she applied for one. Though Robert pased away tragically last year, the site still continues written by a friend. My quarrel with her editing of this section is that she retains no sense of balance in who she features. Maybe she features bloggers who are her friends (mostly Anglo or American-Israelis like herself) or blogs she likes. But she clearly doesn’t go much out of her way to find blogs that offer a progressive perspective on the conflict. I should add that it’s possible she, or the site’s editorial management have embraced more diversity in her choices since I last reviewed her portion of the Global Voices site some time ago. I would hope so.

I also never understood why Tikun Olam, which regularly deals with the Israeli politics and society was rejected for the Israel section while other blogs are included though the blogger does not live in Israel (this is also true of other national sections). The Palestine and Lebanon GV editors have included links to my blog, but not the Israel editor. It’s a little strange if you ask me.

Goldman makes a big point at On the Face of how eager she is to dialogue with Arabs, but her efforts seem devoid of any political understanding of the conflict. The fact that Aussie Dave could be one of her most quoted blogs at Global Voices only confirms this. It’s as if for her dialogue existed for its own sake rather than to advance any particular social good. Perhaps if she were engaging in this work here in the States with African-Americans it might be one thing. But to try to speak with Arabs or Muslims without talking about politics and the terribly hard choices each side will have to make to find peace seems like ignoring the 800 pound elephant sitting in the room.

Also, useful to note that during the Lebanon war she blogged for the right-wing Pajamas Media and wrote a column for the Wall Street Journal none of which are especially known for their fondness for Muslims.

Which brings me to the point of this post. There are three excellent blogs I know which are nominated in this category: Juan Cole’s Informed Comment, Glenn Greenwald’s Unclaimed Territory, and Jews Sans Frontieres. I recommend voting for any of them. Anyone can vote–you don’t have to be a Muslim. This year, as opposed to last, this category is much more competitive and I believe a better choice will be made by voters.

‘Global Voices: Israel’ Lacks Political Diversity

Sunday, June 18th, 2006

Over the past few days, I’ve had a dialogue of the deaf with Lisa Goldman, a Canadian-Israeli journalist who edits the Israel section of the Global Voices website. I’ve criticized the lack of diversity in Goldman’s choices of blogs she covers in her regular roundups of Israeli blogs. I’ve also criticized her narrow definition of what her section accepts. For example, this blog is not eligible because I am not Israeli, even though I blog about Israel every day.

Robert Rosenberg, who IS an Israeli and the author of Ariga.com a blog cum daily briefing on Israeli politics, informs me that his site is not considered eligible by Ms. Goldman because it is not a blog (or so she claims). [Correction: Though Goldman does not include Ariga in her roundup, Robert corrects my misinterpretation of something he wrote in a e-mail. She has never explictily explained to him why he is not included. I stand corrected.] The only thing Ariga.com lacks that other blogs have is a comment feature (and there are many blogs which turn off their comment feature, yet they’re still considered blogs). Interestingly, Goldman includes in her coverage Karen Alkalay-Gut‘s website that calls itself a “diary” but is clearly not a conventional blog. The reason I raise Ariga as an example of Goldman’s narrow-mindedness is that Robert’s views of the Israeli-Arab conflict are similarly progressive to my own.

A search of Goldman’s roundups at the site turns up no mention of Aron Trauring’s Israel Peace Blog, another progressive voice among the Israeli blogging community. Ran Hacohen’s Letter from Israel at Antiwar.com also apparently doesn’t rate as a blog and so is deemed ineligible by Goldman.

I’ve already mentioned in my last post about Global Voices that there are no current Israeli-Arab bloggers featured there (though Goldman had recruited one who stopped writing). This means that Global Voices is not hearing from 20% of the Israeli population.

So who is she covering? In her current roundup she features Dutchblog Israel criticizing the British academic boycott of Israel. She calls him a “leftist” even though his position in the post in question can’t remotely be called leftist. I get the distinct impression that Goldman was pleased to feature a “leftist” who attacked the academic boycott. Next, she featured Olegirl who is “utterly disgusted” by the boycott. Hmm, do we start to see an ideological pattern here?

She also features a post from Treppenwitz about the story of a Palestinian girl suffering from cancer who was treated at an Israeli hospital. It seems the Palestinian minister of health refused to contribute toward the operation because Hamas does not wish to cooperate with such Israeli endeavors. The clear political motivation of the blog post was to stick it to Hamas and the (anti-Israel) world media for allegedly not covering the story:

Yet to these people [journalists] who drool over even the smallest news story the way a starving man drools over a steak, the willingness of the Palestinian Minister of Health… a Medical Doctor for whom politics should come second (if at all)… to let a little Palestinian girl die rather than cooperate with the Israelis, isn’t considered newsworthy.

And secondarily, he seeks to show how magnanimous Israel was to provide the medical treatment to begin with.

Goldman cites Sharvul for a non-political post and calls him “politically leftist.” After searching through his blog I could find hardly any material with overt political content except one post which criticized Israeli peace activists demonstrating outside chief of staff Dan Halutz’s home for calling him a “murderer.” Even if one agrees with his sentiment I’d hardly call it “politically leftist.”

To her credit, Goldman does feature one blog, which she again cites as “leftist” (what is it with the phrase that she uses it so much?), whose owner recounts her personal journey from a Land of Israel supporter to a human rights activist on behalf of the Palestinians. She also features a blog post by Karen Alkalay-Gut about a popular Israeli-Arab writer, one by a gay non-Israeli living in Israel about Gay Pride Day and one by a Lebanese tourist visiting Israel. I’m glad she included these posts (though only the first deals with the Israeli-Palestinian issue I’m raising here).

I have not yet heard from Global Voices editorial management about whether they see a need to expand the political voices in their Israel section. Goldman certainly doesn’t see a need as she dismissively ended our conversation about this saying she was merely writing to explain her position but not to listen to mine. She’s already spent too much time dealing with me as it was, etc.,etc. That’s why I call it a dialogue of the deaf. So unless and until anything changes at Global Voices, you’ll largely be hearing there but a single side of that critical conflict that hovers over Israel and Palestine (and the world) like a 900 lb. elephant. ‘Tis a pity.

I also want to make clear that while I am critical of the way Lisa Goldman is editing her section, I admire Global Voices’ mission overall and wish it only the best. My comments are meant to challenge the site to do better and are not meant at all destructively.

Global Voices Online Excludes Tikun Olam From ‘Israel’ Category

Friday, June 16th, 2006

global voices online logo
Some of you may know of a very interesting blog aggregator called Global Voices Online. It divides up the blogosphere by country and aggregates some of the best national blogs. Each day, a country editor does a roundup which summarizes particular blog posts. Here’s how the website describes its mission:

Global Voices Online is a non-profit global citizens’ media project.

A growing number of bloggers around the world are emerging as “bridge bloggers:” people who are talking about their country or region to a global audience. Global Voices is your guide to the most interesting conversations, information, and ideas appearing around the world on various forms of participatory media such as blogs, podcasts, photo sharing sites, and videoblogs.

I think this is a terrific and much needed resource for bloggers interested in world affairs. In this day and age, when our nation in particular seems more closed off than ever from voices and perspectives beyond our shores, GVO is a welcome addition.

But I’m slightly flummoxed by the decision to exclude the Israeli-Palestinian category of this blog from GVO’s Israel section. To be fair, the idea of our exclusion isn’t entirely outside the bounds of reason. As managing editor Rachel Rawlins wrote to me:

She [Israel editor Lisa Goldman] concentrates on blogs written by people living in Israel since one of our objectives is to curate conversations generally taking place outside the already very well represented regions of North America and Western Europe.

But the way Goldman explained my exclusion rankled:

I do not include your blog in my roundups on the Israeli blogosphere because you are American, not Israeli…My GVO posts are about the Israeli blogosphere, not the Jewish blogosphere. While blogs about Israel by non-Israelis are often interesting and valuable, they do not, by definition, belong to the Israeli blogosphere

While all this is well and good, it is a false dichotomy in the context of GVO’s Israel section. The reason is that GVO covers only English-language blogs, which means in the case of Israel that the blogs are largely written by Israelis of the English-language Diaspora (U.S., Canada, Britain, Australia, etc.) origin. I’m sure that’s not entirely the case, but I know that it is largely the case. And I’m not saying that these blogs are not ‘Israeli.’ But I am saying that they are not nearly as politically or culturally diverse as the Hebrew-language native Israeli blog world.

It’s for that reason that I think it’s critical to include voices like Tikun Olam. After all, my Israeli-Palestinian section is solely about Israel and its relations with its enemy-neighbor much like the blogs Lisa Goldman reviews for GVO (though to be fair, she does review blogs focussed on non-political issues). But I bring a slightly more independent, disinterested viewpoint to the conversation. If you look at Lisa Goldman’s roundups you’ll see that the politics of the blogs she covers are mostly (though not exclusively) right of center, sometimes far to the right. And when she does include progressive voices she’ll invariably use terms like “leftist” (as she’s done twice in her most recent report) to characterize the blog’s viewpoint. She doesn’t even realize the judgmental nature of the term (and certainly wasn’t intending to offend). But as someone whose views of this conflict have been disparaged numerous times by hardline pro-Israel readers, I know how the term is used and how it feels to have someone spit it at you (not that this was by any means Lisa’s intent).

It’s ironic that Haitham Sabbah, editor of the Palestine Global Voices section does periodically include links to my blog posts about the conflict; but Goldman, a fellow lover of Zion refuses to consider doing so as well. Haitham, my supposed enemy embraces me and she views me as treif.

I disagree with her contention that non-Israeli blogs about Israel do not “belong to the Israeli blogosphere.” It is critical that there be more interaction between these two groups and that those interested in Israel and this conflict should have as broad a representation of opinion as possible. Goldman’s own roundups portray this problem through the relative lack of political diversity in them and her own slight awkwardness in covering blogs she sees as “leftist.” Calling a blogger you don’t agree with a “leftist,” as she’s done twice in her most recent roundup is insulting. I don’t believe she intended this as an insult. But it is condescending and judgmental nonetheless. Has she ever called any bloggers in her roundup “rightist?” I didn’t see that term or even “conservative” used in describing bloggers she covers who are right of center.

In fact, a problem with the English language Israeli blog world is that it is largely (though not entirely) shut off from the progressive end of the political spectrum. That’s why I think letting in ‘outside’ voices (though I do not consider myself outside this sphere) would only expand the dialogue. In addition, within Israeli society voices like mine are not heard clearly because the issue of security seems to put a lid on wide-ranging political discussion. This is something the Global Voices should be willing to address & promote.

My GVO roundups include links to blogs by non-Jewish residents of Israel; some of them are citizens and others are not. My goal is to give a voice to Israel’s complex, multi-cultural, multi-ethnic society. I hope that, as a progressive Zionist, you will understand and support my effort to highlight the concerns of Israel’s non-Jewish minority bloggers over those of non-Israelis.

It is good to know that Goldman does not limit her coverage to Jewish Israelis. But if she did this would be discriminatory. So she’s doing a good thing; but it is something I would expect from any competent editor. And why does she make it appear that the decision to include non-Jewish Israeli bloggers in the roundups precludes including folks like me? She’s linking apples & oranges in this case. I say let 1,000 flowers bloom. I would certainly agree if she said she wished to be very careful in terms of the non-Israeli blogs you included because as Rachel wrote to me, you do want to include as much as possible an authentic Israeli voice in this section. But adding my voice will not prevent an authentic Israeli voice from being heard.

By the way, I’m curious how many Israeli Arab bloggers Goldman includes. There may not be many for all I know. But it’d be very valuable to find and include them to the greatest extent possible.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE