Muslim and Jewish Women in Nazareth

'We can live in peace'...John Lennon (photo: Dafna Tal)

Mahzor

Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘khaled-meshal’

Hezbollah Kidnaps Two Israeli Soldiers in Lebanon

Wednesday, July 12th, 2006


Haaretz reports the devastating news that Hezbollah has kidnapped two IDF soldiers in southern Lebanon:

Hezbollah kidnapped two Israel Defense Forces soldiers on the northern border in the midst of massive shelling attacks on Israel’s north Wednesday morning. The IDF confirmed two of its soldiers were missing on the Lebanese border, Channel 10 TV reported.

Hezbollah fighters attacked two IDF armored Hummer jeeps patrolling along the border with gunfire and explosives. The Hezbollah fighters nabbed two of the soldiers and wounded others in the Hummers.

Immediately following the Hezbollah attack, the organization’s Al-Manar television station began broadcasting clips calling on Israel to release Lebanese prisoners held in Israel. The Hezbollah demands emphasized the release of Lebanese militant Samir Al-Kuntar. Al-Manar also broadcast video clips of previous Palestinian and Lebanese attacks on IDF troops.

Two other Israelis were wounded when gunmen in Lebanon began pounding the IDF’s Zarit position and other posts along the border before 9 A.M. According to Al-Manar, Hezbollah kidnapped the two IDF soldiers at 9:05 A.M. and transferred them to a safe location.

The two Israelis were wounded either by mortar shells or rockets that slammed into Moshav Zarit. One was lightly to moderately wounded and the second was lightly wounded.

This could be Israel’s worst nightmare. Now, instead of fighting a one front war in Gaza to free its other IDF kidnap victim, it is now fighting a two front war. In addition, instead of fighting a war against Gaza’s Hamas militants alone, Israel now fights against Hezbollah and its sponsors, Syria and Iran. Part of this is no doubt Bashar Assad’s “payback” for insulting him by having Israeli jets buzz his summer mountain palace in one of Israel’s more bellicose acts of provocation. This new development ratchets up the pressure immensely on the world community to resolve this crisis and to do so soon if possible. The longer it drags on the more likely one of the parties will make a grievous error that could escalate matters out of anyone’s control.

The problem is now that the Arab militants hold the upper hand, they may no longer be so eager to agree to the deal which I write about below. The fact that the UN, the EU and particularly the U.S. placed the Gaza invasion on the back burner diplomatically until now is a shameful mark against them all. If they’d exerted half the energy of Hosni Mubarak and the Turkish government we might have had a more positive outcome and much more quickly.

Finally, this development points out the utter futility of the Omert government’s Gaza folly. If they’d negotiated the deal that they had in the offing instead of stalling for God knows what they might not be in the terrible bind they now face. Now, they are mired in Gaza as well as facing a crisis in the north. What will they do next? Invade southern Lebanon in order to free their two new hostages? The situation is quite impossible. If we thought the Olmert-Peretz-Halutz nexus was failing in their pursuit of a Gaza strategy imagine what they’ll do now that they have a double-barrel crisis before them.

Possible Deal for Shalit Confirmed by Khaled Meshal

I’ve been wrapped up for the past three days in a huge hornet’s nest Maryscott O’Connor and I stirred up at Daily Kos and have been away from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict since then. Good to get back though I wish I had better and more hopeful news to report about the Shalit kidnapping and the Gaza invasion.

Ariga has his usual excellent post covering Khaled Meshal’s press conference yesterday in which he revealed the outline of a possible deal for the freedom of Gilad Shalit. Robert weaves together Meshal’s statements with what he’s been reading from Israeli cabinet ministers to present an optimistic and pessimistic scenario. First the optimistic one:

..>Speculation has the two sides, while blaming each other for the apparent stalemate, broadening the terms of reference for a deal from returning the Israeli soldier and ending the Qassams, into a much broader hudna, involving not only prisoner releases but other Israeli gestures of goodwill — if Hamas is prepared to take charge in Gaza, to prevent attacks on Israel. And added to the brew this morning by at least one report, is the possibility that somehow the final deal would include some form of closure of the case of Ron Arad, the Israeli jet navigator who fell into radical Islamic hands in Lebanon nearly 20 years ago and not heard from for 19 years.

But that’s the optimistic spin. It depends on some creative diplomatic move that seems beyond Israel’s capabilities to initiate, and beyond the power of the Europeans to implement. The Arabs involved in trying to solve the crisis — Hosni Mubarak and King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia — might have the ingenuity, but despite all the praise Olmert heaped on Mubarak, Israel won’t easily trust an Arab-devised solution. The Americans are likely going to hear from Abbas that he is eager to meet Olmert, while the Israeli prime minister will likely say no meeting is possible until the crisis over Shalit is solved.

But here’s the pessimistic version:

That leads to the pessimistic scenario, which various commentators note today essentially means a very lengthy — weeks if not months — of Israeli military operations, behind the scenes negotiations and occasional ‘infuriating and frustrating’ public posturing by spokesmen for the other side.

And of course, if the Gaza invasion continues that long there is almost a guarantee of a major public health crisis including food shortages and other brutally inhumane conditions imposed by Israel’s offensive operations:

Yedioth Aharonoth, Israel’s most widely distributed newspaper, blares this morning that the Gazans are out of food — and its commentator warns that a humanitarian crisis there could spoil the IDF’s operations, by forcing Israel to prematurely end the moves meant to squeeze Hamas. The government is beginning to feel the pressure to ease up…on the Palestinians. According to UNRWA, there’s enough food for ten days — but the real problem is that 50 percent of Gaza is without electricity and there’s no fuel for generators. In any case, emergency basic commodities — including fuel — were sent into Gaza today, but hardly enough for the 1.4 million people in the densely populated Strip.

The theory that enough pressure on the Palestinian population will make them rise against the militants has been proven wrong for the last six years, ever since the intifada began in the fall of 2000. But the IDF still believes in it, like most armies believing it has never been truly given a free hand to do what is necessary to reach the outcome the government wants.

Hamas-Israel Deal in Works for Shalit

Wednesday, July 5th, 2006

Some new, potentially hopeful news from Gaza. Haaretz reports that a deal may be taking shape between Palestinian kidnappers and Israel that would result in the freeing of IDF solider, Gilad Shalit. Here are the outlines of the deal:

According to the London-based publication [Al-Hayat], the Islamic militant group is now willing to free Shalit in return for the release of all Palestinian women detained in Israelis jails, estimated at some 100 prisoners, and a further 30 male inmates who have served terms of over 20 years.

Israel has tentatively agreed to the offer, the newspaper claimed, but has yet discussed when or how many prisoners it would release.

Haled Meshal met with a Turkish official and expressed his willingness to the said deal with Israel. The Damascus-based Hamas official warned the envoy, however, that though his organization preferred finding a diplomatic solution to the current crisis, his organization was ready to fight the IDF if provoked.

Several interesting things about this passage. First, the major role played, not by Egypt which had previously been a main mediator, but by Israeli ally, Turkey. Somehow Turkey seems to have maintained a relationship with both Syria and Hamas while also keeping company with Israel. Second, if this deal comes to pass it appears that Israel will have, at least indirectly been negotiating not only with Hamas, but with one of Hamas’ most hated, reviled leaders (at least in Israeli eyes), Khaled Meshal. Think of all the stupid rhetoric spewed by Olmert, Peretz, Livni and IDF spokespeople about how they won’t negotiate with terrorists, etc. etc. My problem isn’t that they DID negotiate with ‘terrorists’ but that they pretended that the very thought of it made them sick to their stomachs. Well, perhaps it DID make them sick to their stomachs. But not sick enough to walk away from the negotiation in disgust.

Further, this negotiation with Khaled Meshal puts the lie to Israel’s longstanding claim that it will never deal with Hamas since it is a terrorist organization, etc. In this instance, they clearly did deal with Hamas and the sky didn’t fall. Doesn’t this give the lie to that stupid, pointless policy which is so reminiscent of a prior Israeli policy from the 1970s NEVER to negotiate with the PLO. Of course they did just as they will have to negotiate with Hamas if/when there is ever to be a resolution of this horrible conflict, may it come soon and in our day.

Hamas Moderating Its Charter?

Wednesday, February 22nd, 2006

The Jerusalem Post reported February 16th (and a surprising report it is considering the journalistic source) that a long-time Hamas consultant has been charged with preparing a revised version of the controversial charter which quotes liberally from such literary canards as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion:

azzam tamimiAzzam Tamimi working to revise Hamas charter (photo: MABonline.net)

Hamas has been developing a new charter that is designed to showcase a more moderate and non anti-Semitic face, one of those advising on its content has told The Jerusalem Post.

Yet this new document, acknowledged Dr. Azzam Tamimi, 51, the Hebron-born director of the Institute of Islamic Political Thought in London, would still call for an end to the Jewish state and the creation of a Palestinian state on all of mandatory Palestine.

It would, he said, provide for the possibility of a long-term hudna (cease-fire accommodation) with an Israel limited to its pre-1967 borders…

Rather than texts assailing the Jews, as in the current charter, said Tamimi, “The whole language [in the new document] will be changed to political language.”

Tamimi…added in a telephone interview from London, “All that nonsense about The Protocols of the Elders of Zion and conspiracy theories – all that rubbish will be out. It should have never been there in the first place.”

While the article notes that not all Hamas leaders know of the existence of this project, it appears that even of those who do not, many have no objection to rewriting the document:

This is a very special issue which would be addressed by the highest level of Hamas,” Sheikh Yasser Mansour, No. 5 on the Hamas national electoral list, told the Post by phone from his home in Nablus. Mansour added that, in principle, “it is true that we could discuss changes. The charter is not the Koran.”

And this Hamas leader put forth the tantalizing notion that the charter might some day be amended to recognize Israel if it recognizes a Palestinian state:

Sheikh Salah Abu Rukbeh, recently elected from the Hamas list to the council of Gaza’s Jabalya refugee camp, believes that the charter could ultimately be changed to recognize Israel.

“It will be very easy to change the charter if Israel changes its stance about the Palestinians,” he said. “We are ready to change our charter, but is Israel willing to recognize a Palestinian state? Until now it hasn’t. The PLO recognized Israel and changed its charter but Israel did not give us anything.”

Apparently, some senior Hamas operatives don’t even know that their charter contains anti-Semitic slurs. Instead, they erroneously claim (and in all seriousness) that the charter only denounces Israel, but not Jews. Besides betraying their ignorance, doesn’t this tell us how significant this document is in the everyday life of this political party–not very. Which brings one to the question: if these party stalwarts don’t even know what’s written on this bit of paper why should we hold it up to the world as THE DOCUMENT that defines Hamas to the world? Perhaps Hamasniks don’t, after all, murmur its contents each night as they drift off to sleep and resume once again when they wake up in the morning?

Tamimi described the form that the new document might take:

Tamimi said the changed Hamas charter “will describe the history of the problem which made Palestinians a victim of occupation. The main emphasis is that this [objection to Israel] is not a problem between us and the Jews. The problem is the occupation.”

Mansour echoed this distinction, saying, “We don’t have a problem with the Jews. We have a problem with the occupation. The Jewish people deserve respect and freedom to observe their traditions.” He added that Israeli Jews would be free to live in a Palestinian state as Palestinian citizens.

Tamimi…told the Post that jihad would remain a component of the charter, but as a political right to armed struggle to be free of occupation, rather than as a religious imperative.

Tamimi said that clauses in the 1988 charter declaring that that the land on which Israel exists is Islamic Wakf land – “consecrated for the future of Muslim generations until Judgment Day” and thus religiously forbidden to be given to a non-Muslim nation – would be either removed or, “because it does not reflect the reality accurately,” diluted.

“All the land conquered by Muslims was Wakf land, but this doesn’t matter. We’re not struggling to get Spain back. That’s just in the minds of a few idiots.”

And lest doubters question Tamimi’s bona fides as a spokesperson for the movement on this topic, he makes clear he has the ear of Khaled Meshal, its overarching leader:

He said that among those supporting a changed text is Damascus-based Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal. “If you notice, Khaled Mashaal never quoted it because he was not happy with it,” he said. “Sheikh [Ahmed] Yassin never quoted it because he was not happy with it.”

Tamimi, 51, said he is a supporter but not a member of Hamas and is close to leaders such as Mashaal.

As I’ve written in the past here, just because the Post writes a story indicating Hamas may be moderating its political platform doesn’t mean we strike up a band and break out the champagne. There’s a long way to go. But I’ve written a series of posts about numerous positive statements emanating from Hamas indicating a very gradual change in emphasis and softening of tone in discussing these issues. I see them as a positive sign and look forward to reading about more such developments. If they continue we’ll know we’re traveling in the right direction. If they don’t we’ll know we’ve reached a dead end with Hamas.