Muslim and Jewish Women in Nazareth

'We can live in peace'...John Lennon (photo: Dafna Tal)

Mahzor

Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘ken-hutcherson’

Evangelicals: ‘Killing’ Jews With Christian Kindness

Saturday, March 29th, 2008

A group called World Evangelical Alliance bought a full-page N.Y. Times ad (at least $120,000) this week. A bigger waste of money I’d have a hard time conceiving. Nearest I can tell, the basic message is: “Jews, we love you. But we don’t love you enough to stop proselytizing you or converting you. In fact, we really don’t care what you think of that, since it’s more important to us to keep doing this than it is to respect your wishes that we not do so.” And the real kicker was that the evangelical signatories insisted that converted Jews like Jews for Jesus and messianic Jews are still authentic Jews; and that despite becoming Christian, have a right to call themselves Jews for the purpose of insinuating themselves into the lives of unsuspecting Jews they seek to convert.

The ad is quite a performance. Full of fake love and respect attempting to conceal presumptuousness and condescension toward Jews. The odd thing is that the ad pretends it is directed as a friendly communique to Jews. I actually took it as a declaration of war. So if it was supposed to say anything positive toward Jews it failed miserably on that score. In truth, I think it was meant more for an evangelical audience to reconfirm their certainty that they are right in their efforts to convert the Jews.

The ad begins well enough:

As evangelical Christians, we want to express our genuine friendship and love for the Jewish people. We sadly acknowledge that church history has been marred with anti-Semitic words and deeds; and that at times when the Jewish people were in great peril, the church did far less than it should have.

We pledge our commitment to be loving friends and to stand against such injustice in our generation.

But it quickly goes downhill:

• At the same time, we want to be transparent in affirming that we believe the most loving and Scriptural expression of our friendship toward Jewish people, and to anyone we call friend, is to forthrightly share the love of God in the person of Jesus Christ.
• We believe that it is only through Jesus that all people can receive eternal life. If Jesus is not the Messiah of the Jewish people, He cannot be the Savior of the World (Acts 4:12).
• We recognize that it is good and right for those with specialized knowledge, history and skills to use these gifts to introduce individuals to the Messiah, and that includes those ministries specifically directed to the Jewish people (1 Corinthians 9:20-22).
• We deplore the use of deception or coercion in evangelism; however, we reject the notion that it is deceptive for followers of Jesus Christ who were born Jewish to continue to identify as Jews (Romans 11:1).

We love you so much we’d like to kill your religion with kindness. As for Jesus being the messiah of the Jewish people, we Jews don’t believe it. Judaism has never attached a specific identity to the concept of messiah and indeed the very idea of there being a messiah is a late one in the Jewish religion.

I’ve got news for these evangelical jerks: if you continue your ministry to the Jews YOU ARE NOT A FRIEND OF THE JEWS. In fact, you are an enemy of the Jews and we will treat you as such.

Finally, while they reject coercion and deception in missionizing to the Jews, it’s still OK for messianic Jews to pretend that they are Jews in order to beckon real Jews into the embrace of Jesus. Isn’t this the very definition of “deception?” What hypocrisy. What mendacity. Do these people have no shame?

But here’s the real kicker:

We want to make it clear that, as evangelical Christians, we do not wish to offend our Jewish friends by the above statements; but we are compelled by our faith and commitment to the Scriptures to stand by these principles. It is out of our profound respect for Jewish people that we seek to share the good news of Jesus Christ with them, and encourage others to do the same, for we believe that salvation is only found in Jesus, the Messiah of Israel and Savior of the World.

We don’t want to offend you Jews but by God we’re sure as hell willing to do so. But to pretend that they stand by these so called principles out of “respect for Jewish people” is simply beyond the pale. I’m practically sputtering with rage as I write this.

These people are religious Neanderthals. They’ve never heard of ecumenism, tolerance, diversity, respect. Their religious message is: my way or the highway. Let them not deceive themselves that any self-respecting Jew will have anything positive to say about this. The message of this ad should be met with righteous indignation.

Who are some of the individuals and institutions behind this ad? Chuck Colson for one, he of the Watergate burglar coverup and now ministering to prisoners. The director of the Billy Graham Center, a director of the Salvation Army, a bishop of the Church of England, a dean of Pat Robertson’s Regent University, and last but not least, Ken Hutcherson. This former pro football player is local to my neck of the woods and runs a church near the Microsoft campus. He has the dubious distinction of “persuading” Microsoft to turns its back on a state bill that would have prevented discrimination against gays. When he braggged publicly about his lobbying prowess there was such a stink raised among Microsoft employees that Steve Ballmer personally directed his state lobbyists to turn around and support the measure, which promptly passed the next session. Clearly, humility is not a strong suit of this evangelical bunch.

Microsoft Once Did Right by Gays & Lesbians, But No More

Friday, April 22nd, 2005
Hutcherson_1

Why does this man hate gays?

In turning its back on a Washington State gay rights bill (HR 1515) it had previously supported, Microsoft has caved to the the worst sort of religiously bigoted blackmail imaginable.  The Stranger, a Seattle alternative weekly first broke this story, though I first read about the incident in the NY Times, Microsoft Under Fire for Reversal on Gay Rights Bill.

The bill had already passed the State House and lost by a single vote in the State Senate on Thursday (see Seattle Times story).  As the largest private employer in Seattle (and perhaps all of Washington), the state legislature looks to Microsoft for guidance on major policy issues like this.  When the company backed off its previous position, it effectively doomed the proposal.

So who’s the culprit?  Yes, I’m afraid to say its the evangelical Christian right (a subject you’ve been hearing about in this blog especially regarding its pernicious knee jerk support of Israeli policies).  In this case, it’s Ken Hutcherson of Redmond’s Antioch Bible Church (Hutcherson, by the way is African-American, a former Bible student of Tim LaHaye and former Dallas Cowboys player–too bad he didn’t stay in Texas), who met twice with Microsoft representatives before the Senate vote.  In those meetings, he threatened the company with a national boycott if they didn’t back off their support.

Hutcherson_may_day_for_marriage

Hutch with Hummer at D.C.
May Day for Marriage Rally

Even more ominously (as if the above isn’t ominous enough), Hutcherson demanded that MS fire any employee who testified before the Legislature in support of the legislation.  Can you imagine that in this fairly progressive state and in this day and age, religious bigots like Hutcherson get the right to run roughshod over a major corporation like MS and over all citizens of the state who’d like to see gay rights protected?

Perhaps most distressing to me of all in this entire ridiculous incident is that Microsoft did a cold, hard calculation.  There are far more evangelicals in this country likely to heed a call for a boycott than there are gays and lesbians.  MS knew that it stood more to lose economically if it offended evangelicals.  And so doing the right thing suddenly became an expensive proposition.

MS representatives, of course, deny that the meetings with the good Reverend had anything to do with their new position on the bill.  It was all a matter of deciding what their legislative priorities should be and this bill simply didn’t fit.  But Rep. Ed Murray, the bill’s sponsor, put the lie to this obfuscation:

In a conversation last month with Bradford L. Smith, Microsoft’s senior vice president and general counsel, Smith made it clear that the company was under pressure from the church and the pastor and that [Smith] was also concerned about the reaction to company support of the bill among its Christian employees.

Murray said in a recent conversation with Smith, [the latter] said the minister demanded the company fire Microsoft employees who testified this year on behalf of the bill, but that Mr. Smith refused. According to Murray, Smith said "that while he did not do the many things that the minister had requested, including firing employees who had testified for the bill, he believed that Microsoft could not just respond to one group of employees, when there were other groups of employees who felt much different.

"My refrain back to him was that this is a historic moment, that I only had a few weeks, and I wanted Microsoft to do the right thing," the legislator said. "Their concern was that they were hearing from conservative employees who were connected to this minister and needed to sort out how they were going to deal with those problems."

Representative Murray said the company’s contention that the decision not to support the bill had nothing to do with the church was "an absolute lie."

So much for corporate spinelessness.  In The Stranger article, Murray also reveals how demeaning Smith acted towards him during their phone conversation:

The call went very badly, Murray says, with Smith, apparently irked by Murray’s attempts to influence him, launching into a "vicious attack on me" in which he belittled Murray’s political and legislative skills. "I’m a politician. I’m used to people talking to me like I’m a piece of shit, but I have never had anyone talk to me the way this guy did," Murray says. He eventually cut Smith off, saying, as he recalled it, "I know I’m not one of the Masters of the Universe. I’m just some hayseed legislator, but don’t tell me how to do my job."

Returning to Rev. Hutcherson, he appears to be some piece of the Lord’s work.  Would you like to meet this guy in a dark alley or at a ballot box?

Hutcherson, a leading national critic of same-sex marriage, said he believed he could have organized a widespread boycott of Microsoft. He said he told the Microsoft executives, "If you don’t think the moral issue is not a big issue, just count the amount of votes that were cast on moral issues in the last election.

"I told them I was going to give them something to be afraid of Christians about," he said.

Whoa, that’s chilling stuff!

I’d like to call for two things to happen.  First, all those who detest this abominable decision by Microsoft should refuse to buy their products until they rescind their policy regarding this bill.  Second, we must call on our senators and representatives to bring this bill up again.  And if they don’t, then let’s organize an initiative campaign throughout the state to let the people decide.  I’m sure gay-hater Hutcherson has lots of followers and true believers throughout this state.  But I’m equally sure that the largest and most liberal population center of the state, Seattle, has far more numbers who detest Hutcherson’s views and are offended by Microsoft’s behavior.

The Stranger article closes by quoting a gay Microsoft employee: "Microsoft needs to feel the pain of a bad decision here."  Yes, indeed.  Let’s make them feel it.